Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-PA) has been struggling with other members of the Democratic establishment to appease the far-left radicals in her party. Last week, she insisted that she was not concerned about the rising socialist movement in her party. Sixty-five percent of Democratic voters now support socialism and a shocking 60% would support a military coup. Now Dean is throwing the Supreme Court to the mob, declaring that the institution is “corrupted,” the common claim of court-packers to justify a hostile takeover of the Court. She has joined an ignoble list of politicians who choose personal power over our constitutional principles.
Dean went on MS NOW to show her radical bona fides in an interview with host Jonathan Capehart, who raised the favorite talking point of how the Republicans were seeking to steal the next election.
Dean immediately turned the question into an attack on the Court, expressing her concern “about a United States Supreme Court that has been so corrupted.”
It is a narrative that is entirely unconnected to reality. As I discussed in a recent column, the Court continues not only to rule against this president in major cases but also to rule unanimously or nearly unanimously in the vast majority of cases.
Dean’s criticism of the Court is particularly ironic in the same week the Court again ruled against Republicans in an election case by rejecting, for a third time, the effort to redesign voting districts before the midterm elections.
The false narrative is part of a concerted effort by Democratic politicians to condition voters into accepting court packing. Professors and pundits are now demanding that court-packing be an actual litmus test for Democratic candidates.
The reason is a sad statement about the state of American politics. Presented with the prospect of guaranteeing power for years by rejecting our constitutional values and traditions, politicians like Dean are choosing power.
Former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder has put packing the Supreme Court front and center, explaining, “[We’re] talking about the acquisition and the use of power if there is a Democratic trifecta in 2028.”
It is the Nike School of Constitutional Law. Democratic leaders are pledging to “just do it” to appease the mob. Of course, some of these measures would be challenged if done without constitutional amendment. The Supreme Court would then have to rule on the effort to pack or limit its members. The expansion can be done by legislative vote. Although most Americans oppose court packing, Democrats view control of the Court as essential to pushing through a radical agenda to change the political system to their advantage.
Years ago, Harvard professor Michael Klarman laid out a radical agenda to change the system to guarantee Republicans “will never win another election.” However, he warned that “the Supreme Court could strike down everything I just described.” Therefore, the court must be packed in advance to make these changes possible.
In the same way that a vast majority of Democratic voters now say that they would favor a military coup in the name of “saving democracy,” Democratic politicians are claiming to protect our constitutional system by destroying it with court packing.
Every leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination has now embraced court-packing, a new litmus test for the far left.
It is the ultimate form of corruption … in politicians like Rep. Dean. Presented with a clear choice between power and principle, they choose power.
Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”
The fall of our constitutional republic begins with the mental woke illusions / fantasies.
The same Democrats who complain that Trump says an election is corrupt when he doesn’t win make the identical argument about the Supreme Court. If rulings don’t go their way, these crybaby Democrats scream that it is corrupted and needs to be packed to pass their radical, anti-Constitutional agenda.
Now do an analysis of what Project 2025 wants to do to America.
They want to Make America Great Again.
Be more specific. What changes does Project 2025 want to make in terms of having corporations take control of government agencies?
A politician with principles. Now that’s a novel idea.
Maybe the time has come to follow the progressive playbook and bow to their demands. Congress should submit and pass a bill tomorrow morning (October 30, 2026) to add 20 more justices to SCOTUS before December 31, 2028. That should fill progressives with the feeling of great accomplishment and pride.
Where do you come with such childish stupidity?
Steve throw’s tantrums a lot. Like my 7 year old daughter.
Gotta love it when Anonymous literally starts having a conversation with him/her self.
Correction: It self, not him/her self.
JT, as usually an excellent article. BUT as always, NO solution! WHICH MEANS A WASTE OF TIME TO READ. We are already in an insurrection. The NM delegation “appears” to supports Hamas, Iran and the over throw of our government.
@ERB
Um, that’s the point. This is obviously a huge problem, and it does not fall on the shoulders of the Professor or anyone else to do your thinking for you. Like it or not, YOU have to decide, and YOU have to be a part of the solution. We all do. Passivity died when Nancy tore up the speech on camera. 🤷🏽♂️
“BUT as always, NO solution! WHICH MEANS A WASTE OF TIME TO READ.”
This unwarranted criticism of JT pops up now and again.
You read an article warning against the dangers of overeating, with the conclusion: Don’t do it.
How is that “don’t do it” *not* a solution? And how is that article a “waste of time to read.” (BTW, all caps shows hysteria, not emphasis.)
Finally, rather than kvetch, why don’t you offer what you would regard as a “solution?”
Its an opinion piece. Do you understand what that is?
If you’re looking for guidance, aka a Guru, then you should read comic books.
( from Google AI search for Jacobins and the judicial system) “During the French Revolution, the Jacobins viewed the traditional court system and royal judges with deep hostility, suspicion, and contempt, seeing them as corrupt remnants of feudal privilege. Over time, their philosophy evolved from wanting a highly restricted, democratized judiciary into completely replacing standard law with “revolutionary justice”—subordinating judges and courts to state control to eliminate enemies of the Republic” It appears that we have our own Jacobin revolutionaries already in congress and within our 2 branches of government – our legislative and judicial. What would be the most efficient way to fumigate both chambers and their state level counter parts.
We all knew you were a fraud and now you admit it that you have used AI to generate your insane irrelevant comments.
You are just a pile of ignorance, aren’t you? Quoting from a source that corroborates your views is how research is done and published. It would be my guess that you never had to write a term paper using on the Reader’s Guide to Periodic Literature and the local library card catalogue to find your sources, and then type that term paper on a manual typewriter with every sentence and footnote perfectly done; no Grammarly, no search engines on the internet, nothing but your brain and your fingers. And it definitely shows.
Corroborates your views? As in one-track mind full of hate for people who do not abide by your hateful world view? Said like a dutiful hate monger.
Sure, screech on old woman.
you are persistent, much like Iran’s quest for a nuclear weapon to destroy the west.
For the slaves of Islam to rule the world Judaism and Christians must be deleted? Jews are hated because they’ve been successful. Are there such worlds? I imagine there are and they are dark worlds. Imo
What say we just cut to the chase here and offer a response the Democrats should pay very close to attention.
Even if one accepts the polling numbers of 60% what is being ignored is the strength of conviction of the 40% and that groups dedication to traditional American values that are under attack.
Do the Democrats (actually the small number of Democrats who are behind all of this) really think they have the ability to run over almost half of the Voters in this Country and do as they aspire to doing?
They might just look at one of those Red/Blue Maps and then look up gun ownership numbers in a companion map and consider very carefully what the two when combined shall communicate.
Then, while they ruminate on that they might then look to where the vast majority of the members of the US Military come form and just what kind to mindset those folks hold owing to their raising and backgrounds….and their commitment to defend the United States Constitution.
Let’s face it….some things are worth standing and dying for….and if it ever comes to a violent overthrow of the American way of life and its Government….the Democrats (all of them) best decide which path is best….adhering to our Constitutional processes or attempting to use violence of any kind or description to achieve the goals of the very small but vocal minority of their own Party and an even much smaller minority of the American People.
They best choose wisely…..all of the Democrats.
They choose wrongly and they shall wind up licking a Buzz Saw.
Let’s pray the Democrats come to their senses and reject those the Professor is describing he sees corrupting his own Democrat Party.
The red scare! Run for the hills!
Hey donkey – 60%.
Eventually, and soon if their ideas prevail, the mob will come for her. Ask Robespierre.
This court decided against Trump on birthright citizenship, tariffs, the Fed, the Alien Enemies Act, the Missouri redistricting (disregarding both standing and the merits to get there) and no doubt others. He has attacked his own appointees many times. The idea that it is in his pocket is absurd and a measure of the extremism of the Democrats.
The US Supreme Court is in the pocket of the Federalist Society billionaires. They were the ones who provided names for nomination to Trump. They are the ones shepherding members through the system to avoid controversial or noteworthy decisions to avoid any decisions that could expose them in order to make them bland and unobjectionable.
Those “shepherds” have done their job keeping your wolves from the majority. What else you got?.
The wolves in sheep’s clothing from the Federalist Society took stare decisis behind the woodshed and killed it.
The Federalist Society is composed of conservative and libertarian academics, legal scholars, lawyers and others who advocate for a textualist and originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
Consequently, the Federalist Society opposes the “living constitution” ideology.
The “living constitution” ideology is an illegitimate use of the courts to impose policy that can not be achieved either in the legislature or through the constitutional amendment process.
They’ve turned the judicial system into another political branch.
The Federalist Society backers look to the days of slavery as a basis for returning America to the time when slave owners controlled what their slaves did. What they want is to not be responsible for care of the slaves. Now they want the slaves to live a bare existence where the product of their labors goes to enrich the 1%.
Oh please, just stop.
Democrat President-appointed Byron White, 30+ years on bench, waited for another Democrat president (Clinton) to be elected before strategically announcing that he would retire at the end of the term in June 1993. Clinton then nominated Ginsburg.
“Bill Clinton Reflects on Nominating RBG to SCOTUS, Says Ginsburg ‘Hoped Hillary Would Be Elected’ So She Could Retire.”
https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/bill-clinton-says-ruth-bader-ginsburg-hoped-hillary-would-be-elected-so-she-could-retire/
Justice David Souter (a New Hampshire Republican nominee who was more liberal than many Democrats) waited out George W. Bush’s two terms as president (Bush Sr. had nominated Souter), then strategically retired from the court in 2009. Obama then nominated irreverent, mouthy Sotomayor.
Two of nine? A very lacking minority? The Federalist Society has placed 6 of 9 Justices to the Supreme Court.
They want 9 of 9.
No, not two of nine. He was not comparing Democrat input with Federalists. Can you read? Even I can understand that he was simply saying that certain Leftist Justices themselves were manipulating the system
A cadre of extremists, holding tightly to the flawed and bizarre ideas of a man who never made a living and depended on bilking his parents and his wealthy acolyte, upended nations and brought to its people misery and starvation by the millions and murdered millions more.
The only thing socialists can produce are empty dreams and promises. They eventually have to sell the harsh reality once they are fully burrowed in office. The more the government grows the less freedoms the people will have.
There are many examples of how “wonderful” socialism is working, especially when it eventually takes its natural course toward communism and “collective” misery.
But, hey they are promising free stuff!
FOLLOW THE MONEY. One fact seems fundamental to these leftward primary transitions: the Democratic Party’s official machinery is short of cash. All candidates need money. That implies large sources of money exist outside the party committees themselves, and it implies Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer cannot steer the field the way party leaders once could. Thin official coffers mean less leverage for the standard agenda.
The numbers are specific. As of the end of August 2026, the Democratic National Committee reported about $16.9 million cash on hand and $17.6 million in debt. The Republican National Committee reported about $125.6 million and no debt. The three Republican national committees together held about $233 million, versus about $130 million for their Democratic counterparts, a gap of roughly $103 million. Add allied super PACs and the disparity grows: MAGA Inc. alone held about $416 million entering September; Senate Leadership Fund had about $238 million in midsummer, against about $126 million for Schumer-aligned Senate Majority PAC.
That does not mean Jeffries and Schumer have nothing. Jeffries’s campaign had raised about $15 million by mid-2026 and held about $5 million cash; he pledged $500,000 to the DCCC and offered to match members’ dues. Schumer’s campaign held about $8 million. The DSCC even entered September ahead of the NRSC ($37.6 million versus $18.7 million). Their constraint is relative power, not an empty wallet. They can still write checks. They cannot match the outside money now flowing to both establishment rivals and insurgent candidates.
As usual, another AI sourced comment. Can’t you AI fraudsters think for yourselves?
One poll of 1200 people and you think this is representative of the 330 million+ in the U.S.?
CRT!
DEI!
Trans!
Tan suit!
Birth certificate!
Muslims!
Cats and dogs!
Communism!
Socialism!
Epstein?
Squirrel!
Magats have TDS.
Bona fides you say. Dean better put on her track shoes, because there are at least three categories of bona fides that have been served up at the Democratic party table in the last 20 years.
Policy tests (Medicare for All, Green New Deal, abortion);
Institutional-reform tests (filibuster, Electoral College, Supreme Court size);
Cultural/identity signaling tests (#MeToo, BLM, gender terminology, Gaza solidarity).
– LGBTQ+
– Occupy Wall Street
– #MeToo
– Green New Deal
– Abolish ICE
– George Floyd
– Hands up, Don’t shoot
– Defund the police
– Covid restrictions
– Transgender movement
– Define a woman
– Anti-Israel/We are Palestine
And the next frontier is a throwback to the famed former Spokane NAACP president Rachel Dolezal. A white American Philadelphia activist, Hannah Gann, claimed she was of Black, Palestinian and Tunisian heritage. Yes, she has since retracted that claim, but that glass floor has been cracked.
Olly: While lazily channel-surfing from my sofa, I saw this on Fox News (re: Gann). No legacy MSM has touched it. The followers of Hannah Gann have been Ganned.
Rachel Dolezal (for those who do not remember her; she now goes by the name of Nkechi Diallo) “is now working as a ‘certified sex coach’ and launched an intimacy program called ‘Bandwidth.’ Diallo said she graduated from the Sexology Institute’s 300-hour certification program and shared photos from her celebration.” (I’m convinced that Diallo’s ‘Bandwidth’ may soon represent LGBTQRSabc1234.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/videos/ex-naacp-official-rachel-dolezal-185312999.html
Dean is just another brain-dead zombie-Democrat. The motto of the university law school where she was indoctrinated (Widener University Law School) proclaims as its motto: “Sound Mind in Sound Body,’ yet another misrepresentation of fact when examining Dean’s bona fides. It brings to mind Thomas Paine’s observation: “Trying to argue with a person who has renounced reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”`
May everyone please read President George Washington’s Farewell Address. In it, the Father Of Our Country explained it all.
Stephen, what he had to say reaches all the way down to us. And grabs us by the stacking swivel.
Oh Steve shut-up with your nostalgic nonsense. Its 2026 so grow up mentally.
When President George Washington and the Bill Of Rights are seen as nostalgic nonsense, it’s time to pray.
Dems are just shooting themselves in their foot every time they do this crazy extremists left-wing nonsense. Mark my words as a a moderate Independent, it’s just going to harm them more and more in the long run. It may work on the two coasts, but that’s where it also ends, because but it’s not work where the rubber meets the road, with the rest of America
Are moderate Independents swinging toward Republicans or Democrats? Just maybe, crazy extremism isn’t limited to one Party.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “Are moderate Independents swinging toward Republicans or Democrats?”
I think moderate independents (of which I am one) are very rapidly swing towards the side that is actually supporting the Constitution (Republican Party) and openly opposing the anti-American side that is openly trying to destroy the Constitution and the Democratic Republic of the USA (Democratic Party).
In recent years, the Democratic Party has figuratively dropped their pants and fully exposed their true extremist underbelly of Socialism and/or Communism, there is absolutely no hiding it anymore and they’re quite proud of it. Democrats are leaving the party in droves. I personally know many life long Democrats that have openly stated that the Democratic Party has left them for anti-American ideals and they cannot tolerate it anymore, they’ve left the party.
What say you, enigmainblackcom?
I say there will be an excellent way to measure what Independents and those in each Party are feeling, and that is the election, forget about the polls. Certainly, there are Democrats that are disappointed in the Party. It’s clear to me that many Republicans have discovered that many of the traditional beliefs of the Party have been thrown aside in favor of the needs of the few and the One. As for Independents, you have narrowed the description to moderate independents, we will see which way they go in November. What is it you see, not only in Trump, but in a Party afraid to stand against him when he defies the Courts, the Constitution, and the laws. All the while enriching himself and his family? I think you’re wrong, but no need to debate it, we’ll see in November. Did I mention forever wars?
enigmainblackcom,
I basically ignore polls, especially political polls.
I have so many friends (moderates, moderate independents, and extremists alike) on both sides of the political isle that I talk with regularly about this kind of stuff that it’s relatively easy for me to observe trends. Some of these friends I mention are past Governors, state & county political party elites, city mayors, city alderman, county board members, county executives, school board members, school teachers, business owners, lawyers, police officers, fire fighters, executives in non-profit social organizations, etc. The list is long and in some ways distinguished. It’s a good cross section.
What I’ve observed are non-extremist life long liberal Democrats that generally support the Constitution (as written) leaving the party one after another because the core of their party has left them in the dust and shifted to the absurd socialist/communist extremes. I’m observing non-extremist Republicans, moderate conservatives, fully supporting the Constitution and core conservative policies but biting at the bit to vote for someone other than the loose cannon mouthed narcissist Donald Trump. I’m observing moderate independents that support the Constitution, like myself, very vocally opposing the extreme shift of the political left and that opposition will likely show up as an increase in votes for Republicans in 2026 and 2028. The extremists on both ends of the spectrum are dug in, tunnel visioned, and politically immovable.
Like any “poll”, what I observe is a small subset of the whole and cannot be expected to be accurately extrapolated out to the entire voting base across the USA; however, as far as the political left has shifted over the last few years towards being openly anti-American, these trends are significant and should not be ignored.
I completely agree that the only “poll” that’s accurate is the one in the voting booth and sometimes that is dramatically affected by who is, and who is not, motivated to show up to vote. The mid-term election in November should give us some insight into what will likely happen in November 2028.
Finally, I firmly believe that if the Democratic Party doesn’t rapidly shift away from their current trend towards Socialism/Communism they will completely destroy themself from within.
Thanks for the discussion.
Despite what you might hear from Jonathan Turley, his associates at Fox News, and Republican politicians in desperate need to talk about something other than the Iran War and the economy. The Democratic Socialists of America make up .03 percent of the Democratic Party and many of them don’t know what’s in the platform.
Thank you as well. I’ll check back after November 3rd and compare notes.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “The Democratic Socialists of America make up .03 percent of the Democratic Party”
HOGWASH!
NOTE: At no time did I discuss the actual DSA or its members, I discussed the actual observed trend of the Democratic Party, aka the political left, shifting towards the extreme socialist/communist left.
What you wrote above must be parroting a left talking about actual members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in direct comparison to the actual members of the Democratic Party; this is a transparent effort to downplay how much the Socialists/Communists have taken control of the Democratic Party. Reality tells us that the .03 percent figure, that you presented as fact, isn’t supported in the overall trends of the plethora of political polls or in the results in actual voting booth outcomes.
Something you should think seriously about; you don’t elect openly Socialist candidates, or candidates that support extreme Socialist policies, into office with .03 percent of the Democratic Party voting for them, you put them in office with an actual majority of the Democratic Party voters fully supporting their platform.
In my opinion; that .03 percent comparison is pure propaganda.
I got the figure from a Fox News broadcast, placing the membership of the DSA at 120,000 people, which I then compared to the millions of registered Democrats. You can check the figures for yourself as it doesn’t seem you’re inclined to accept mine. I can understand how you might think differently if your news source portrays Democrats as becoming socialist, and believing in a bunch of things that isn’t universally true.
Factually — reporting that some media sources place DSA membership above 120,000 as of July 2026.
Based on the most authoritative, recent nationwide compilations, the Democratic Party has roughly 45–49 million registered Democrats in 2026.
Wikipedia — listing DSA membership as 120,000+ (2026).
AMAC (Association of Mature American Citizens) — reporting DSA’s July 4, 2026 announcement that it passed 120,000 members.
enigmainblackcom,
Do you realize that nothing you wrote actually contradicts anything I wrote and in fact you’ve supported the theory I presented with “actual” numbers. Thanks for proving me correct.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “I can understand how you might think differently if your news source portrays Democrats as becoming socialist…”
That’s absurd. I don’t need a news source to portray that, I see it first hand right in my backyard here in south central Wisconsin and other areas of the USA. Are you really that partisan blind?
You just don’t seem to be comprehending that the pure propaganda argument you’ve been parroting that downplays how many DSA members there are in comparison to how many members there are in the Democratic Party is so rediculous that it’s actually an intellectually absurd comparison. It’s pure propaganda feeding gullible minds talking points.
A couple of recent examples to support my argument…
1. Milwaukee, WI area has roughly 900 DSA members and nearly 63,000 people in the Milwaukee area voted for the DSA candidate Francesca Hong.
2. Madison, WI (Dane County area) has roughly 950 members in the DSA and nearly 67,000 people voted for the DSA candidate Francesca Hong.
3. New York City has the largest DSA chapter in the USA with roughly 15,000 members and in their last election for Mayor of NYC there was 1.1 million people that voted for the DSA candidate Zohran Mamdani.
No enigmainblackcom, no one using a shred of critical thinking gives a flying f**k about how many actual DSA members there are in comparison to how many Democratic Party members there are, it’s completely irrelevant drivel. The proof of the Democratic Party shift towards Socialism/Communism is right there in the outcomes of actual elections. A huge swath of Democrats support anti-American DSA candidates, or anyone that seems to parrot the DSA anti-American rhetoric. A majority of Democrats across the USA will almost always support DSA candidates over non DSA candidates in primaries, and certainly vote for anything with a (D) after their name even if the candidate is openly DSA just to vote against any Republican, these people are partisan hacks and ideological morons. Then on top of all of that, we have faux moderate liberal candidates running as Democrats that are literally closet Socialists and prominent Democrats and Democrat pundits are openly telling the candidates to lie about their Socialist policy tendencies and just shift into full Socialist high gear after they’re elected.
Maybe the people voting for DSA members are just really annoyed with the Republicans. For everything you say you are seeing in Wisconsin. Recent elections including the State Supreme Court are saying something else. I’m content to wait until November and see what happens, including in Wisconsin.
Informational Side Note – Not For Discussion
enigmainblackcom,
Your math is off.
The number you stated was .03 percent, here is the correct rapid method of calculating percentage using those numbers:
120,000 / 45,000,000 X 100 = 0.267% rounded to 0.3%
Even though both of these percentages are very low, your .03 percent is off by a factor of 10. That’s the kind of unnoticed mathematical error that can eat up a margin of error and cause bridges and buildings to fall down. I think you likely didn’t enter in one of the zeros in the 120,000 value. Poop occurs.
Class dismissed. 😉
You’re right, my math was off. I didn’t recheck it, I went by what I thought I remembered. The actual percentage (rounded up) is .003. 45,000,000 x .003 ee 135,000. We can each go back to class but the DSA is an even smaller percentage than I thought. BTW, I don’t know what class allowed you to multiply by an extra 100 to get to a number you liked better.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “You’re right, my math was off. I didn’t recheck it, I went by what I thought I remembered. The actual percentage (rounded up) is .003. 45,000,000 x .003 ee 135,000. We can each go back to class but the DSA is an even smaller percentage than I thought.”
Oh My God! Your Middle School and High School basic mathematics classes completely FAILED you!
As a tutor for mathematics for nearly 50 years, I’m not going to let this level of ignorance persist.
You really, really, should have done just a little bit of homework or Google searching before you wrote that, because it’s absolutely FALSE! Heck you could have used an online percentage calculator, like this one to check your math before you figuratively opened your mouth to change socks and look utterly foolish. I intentionally gave you the benefit of the doubt as an out and you actually chose to doubled down on blatantly incorrect mathematics.
The math I presented is the correct math to figure out a percentage, what you did was to derive a factor and then falsely call it a percentage. What you did was show everyone exactly how arrogance can turn into showing off the Dunning-Kruger effect in written form.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “BTW, I don’t know what class allowed you to multiply by an extra 100 to get to a number you liked better.”
The mathematics classes that properly taught me the difference between a factor and percentage and how to correctly derive both.
Please critically think a bit more before responding to comments posted by others.
.003 percent of 45,000,000 is 135,000 no matter what you say.
enigmainblackcom wrote, “.003 percent of 45,000,000 is 135,000 no matter what you say.”
I see you’re now resorting to the unspoken progressive core belief of “don’t confuse you with actual facts”. I really did give you every chance to redeem yourself but you’ve officially earned yourself the label of moron.
Facts are still facts even if morons, like you, don’t believe them.
30% (.3) of 45,000,000 is 13,500,000. 3% (.03) of 45,000,000 is 1,350,000. .3% (.003) of 45,000,000 is 135,000 which I’ve been saying all along. Which, if any of these numbers do you disagree with?
enigmainblackcom wrote, “.3% (.003) of 45,000,000 is 135,000 which I’ve been saying all along.”
Liar!!!
That’s not what you’ve been saying all along.
What you’ve been saying all along is that “.003 percent of 45,000,000 is 135,000” which is mathematically FALSE!
You writing “.003 percent” is NOT and never will be equivalent to writing “.3%”.
You can argue your faux math like an ignorant moron for a week of Tuesday’s and it’s still not going to make it any less false.
.003 percent ≠.3%
Period!
https://societysbuildingblocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/CalculatePercentage.jpg
“DSA at 120,000 people, which I then compared to the millions of registered Democrats.”
To understand the *future* of the democratic party, those numbers are irrelevant and a deflection.
The power of the ideas and the passion are completely in the hands of the DSA. The policy proposals are with the DSA. (Notice all of the mainline D’s adopting DSA policies.) The energy of the party is with the DSA.
The traditional D party is now a dead man walking.
The traditional Republican Party has absolved itself of anything it used to believe in, in favor of whatever Trump wakes up telling them to think. What does the Republican Party stand for? Apparently protecting those in the Epstein Files, enriching the president and his family, and persecuting brown and Black people. They are still in favor of tax cuts, but mostly for the rich.
What does the Republican Party stand for?
basic math skills for starters
You literally reinforce every stereotype that exists about blacks.
Go to your masters, William. They are calling for their man-boy
“The Democratic Socialists of America make up .03 percent of the Democratic Party”
But virtually every significant Democrat candidate is supporting the DSA’s most significant extremist platform, so one has to look at the Democrats as non-signed members of the DSA.
I’d love to see you document any of that. As always, you just make things up you imagine sound good. I guarantee, whatever your answer might be. It won’t include documentation of anything you assert to be true. Silence would be better than proving yourself a liar.
Enigma: every time I hear about a Democrat presently running for office, they are afraid to get on the wrong side of the DSA so they add their support to what I believe the Democrats fought against (at least when I was a registered Democrat). No, I can’t prove it, and I should have said that because my observation surprised me.
Come On Man – ALL politicians are basically used car and timeshare salespeople who are agnostic!! They will say ANYTHING to get you to sign the deal with THEM!! Slimebags come in both sexes, all races, and RELIGIONS! Its only about being IN POWER because if you are out of power you can’t milk the system and get ‘rich or laugh trying’ right?