The struggle between reformers and religious fanatics in Saudi Arabia continues. Leading Wahhabi cleric Sheihk Abdurrahman al-Baraak called for the deaths of journalists Abdullah bin Bijad Al-Otaibi and Yusuf Abu al-Khayl after they published articles in Al-Riyadh newspaper, questioning the view that Christians and Jews are unbelievers. While in most nations this would be viewed as an interesting question for a scholastic debate, Abdurrahman al-Baraak would like it to end in a double beheading. Bin Nijad wrote an article entitled, “The Islam of the Sharia and the Islam of Struggle” and Abu al-Khayl wrote an article entitled “The Other in the Islamic Balance.” Not exactly racey stuff, but the fatwa declares them both to be un-Islamic and states that “those who are against the Islam should be judged to repent, otherwise they should be killed and denied the burial rituals.” This follows a series of similar stories of medieval responses by religious extremists in the Kingdom, click here and here For the full story, click here.

Topics
- Academics (132)
- Bizarre (1191)
- Columns (65)
- Congress (347)
- Constitutional Law (543)
- Courts (111)
- Criminal law (842)
- Environment (116)
- Justice (580)
- Lawyering (394)
- Media (48)
- Military (73)
- Politics (689)
- Religion (136)
- Society (1052)
- Supreme Court (126)
- Testimony (19)
- Torts (393)
- Uncategorized (171)
- USA Today (51)
Recent Posts
- Putting the Prude Back Into Prudente: Florida Man Jailed for Failure to Sod Lawn
- Lawsuit Filed to Unfreeze Assets of Muslim Charity
- Neighbor Charged with Feeding Dogs Nails and Broken Glass to Stop Barking
- The Lowest Common Denominator: Racist Displays Again Openly Displayed at Palin Rally
- Iran Set to Execute Another Christian for Converting From Islam
Top Posts
- Beaten to Death In Club City: Australian Tourist Killed by Staff at Indian Restaurant for "Arrogant" Attitude
- Oklahoma Couple Arrested in Massive Bestiality Case
- Connecticut Rules In Favor of Same-Sex Marriage
- As the Waters Rise, McCain Keeps Palin': Running Mate Found Guilty of Ethical Violations But Will Remain on Ticket
- Shock Video: Car Stolen as Police Officer Gives Interview with CNN
- Jamie Lee Spears Pregnancy Raises Questions Over Fairness of Statutory Rape Prosecutions
- Fifteen-Year-Old Student Charged with Child Pornography in Sending Pictures to Friends -- Of Herself
- Boy Scouts Face Eviction as Discriminatory Organization in Philadelphia
- No, We Can't: Missouri Teacher Suspended Over "Obama Youth" Video
- Eight-Year-Old Boy Killed at Baseball Field With Faulty Wiring
Recent Comments
| Former Federal LEO on Connecticut Rules In Favor of … | |
| Former Federal LEO on Connecticut Rules In Favor of … | |
| jonolan on Lawsuit Filed to Unfreeze Asse… | |
| kh in nj on Putting the Prude Back Into Pr… | |
| Jill on Lawsuit Filed to Unfreeze Asse… | |
| rcampbell on Connecticut Rules In Favor of … | |
| UseYourNoodle on Indian Tantrik Tries to Kill M… | |
| Jimmy on Beaten to Death In Club City: … | |
| Former Federal LEO on Connecticut Rules In Favor of … | |
| mespo727272 on As the Waters Rise, McCain Kee… | |
| mespo727272 on Lawsuit Filed to Unfreeze Asse… | |
| mespo727272 on Connecticut Rules In Favor of … | |
| mespo727272 on The Lowest Common Denominator:… | |
| rawdawgbuffalo on The Lowest Common Denominator:… | |
| An Australian Touris… on Beaten to Death In Club City: … |
Archives
- October 2008 (53)
- September 2008 (121)
- August 2008 (157)
- July 2008 (182)
- June 2008 (139)
- May 2008 (154)
- April 2008 (146)
- March 2008 (166)
- February 2008 (124)
- January 2008 (108)
- December 2007 (168)
- November 2007 (162)
- October 2007 (130)
- September 2007 (109)
- August 2007 (194)
Blogroll
Legal and Policy Sites
- Above the Law
- Altercation
- Appellate Law and Practice
- Argue With My Dad
- Concurring Opinions
- Crime and Federalism
- CrimProfBlog
- Daily Kos
- Fire Dog Lake
- How Appealing
- Medill
- Oyez
- Politico
- Progressivedem
- Scotusblog
- Sentencing Blog
- Simple Justice
- Sua Sponte
- Supreme Court Transcripts
- The Moderate Voice
- Truthout
- Underdog
- USA Today blog
One has to wonder why any rational journalist would want to remain in the hard-line Islamic countries where the smallest kind of disagreement puts them at risk of capital punishment. While I sympathize with and admire their bravery in their desire to educate and inform their countrymen (women included as well), I question why they have to put their own lives at risk. Is it because they want to remain, or because it is so difficult to leave these countries that they have no option but to remain? I ask because I honestly don’t know.
We could always ask “DR” Sami Al-Arian what he thinks couldn’t we.
I’m certain that dateline is wrong. It is March 31, 1008!
Susan,
I can only speak to your question by giving you answers I’ve heard from other people who were similarly situated in their religion and or country. The people I know are willing to risk death because they are absolutely committed to change in their religion and/or nation. Many people do leave after a time because the stress of being under a death sentence is too much to bear or they might have friends or family whose lives they will not risk, even if they might be willing to risk their own.
Jill
Susan:
There are remarkably brave journalists and women who are fighting for reform in the Kingdom. This is a country with a very large population of educated people, who privately complain about the restrictions. The fight of these reporters and feminists often make the work of civil libertarians in Western countries appear trivial in comparison.
It will be interesting to watch as Saudi Arabia struggles with these modern reforms and archaic traditions. For reformers, however, there will remain tremendous dangers during any transition into more modern laws and tolerant policies.