Nanny State Bans Nannies: English Town Bars Parents and Nannies from Playgrounds

250px-Cassatt_Mary_Nurse_and_Child_1896-97We previously discussed whether England was becoming a “Nanny State.” Now, it turns out that even the nanny is not welcomed. The city fathers (and mothers) of Watford has solved the danger of strangers bothering children by banning parents from playground areas. Mayor Dorothy Thornhill observes simply, “Sadly, in today’s climate, you can’t have adults walking around unchecked in a children’s playground.”

The truly sad thing, Ms. Thornhill, is the climate of governmental control and the gradual reduction of rights in England, here, here, here, here, here, here.

Parents have been replaced by “play rangers,” public employees who will no doubt bring to childcare what postal employees bring to communication. The logic of this policy beats Bristol’s request that owners not lock their sheds and garages to stop break ins, here.

Of course, this will end the plague of “free-range children” who believe that they can roam and associate with such people as their parents without state approval or supervision.

What concerns me most is that the city council has failed to see the real problem: children. No children, no child abuse or abduction. Alternatively, we may want to consider only having play rangers procreate . . . oh wait, they then could not be play rangers if they are parents (to be known as “breeders” in play ranger parlance). We may have to go to the use of play ranger eunuchs who confine each child to a walled space of constant observation. Oh wait, that has been tried . . .

For the full story, click here.

8 Responses to “Nanny State Bans Nannies: English Town Bars Parents and Nannies from Playgrounds”


  1. 1 Anonymously Yours 1, October 28, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    I may be lost here but did not Hitler already try this approach?

    But then again not to sound German the English family of German Heritage changed the name to a more proper English sounding one.

    The royal family’s official name, or lack thereof, became a problem during World War I, when people began to mutter that Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sounded far too German. King George V and his family needed a new, English-sounding name. After considering everything from Plantagenet to Tudor-Stuart to simply England, the king and his advisors chose the name Windsor.

    Link: http://www.royalty.nu/Europe/England/Windsor/

  2. 2 Elaine M. 1, October 28, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    It looks like the Nanny State is metamorphosing into the Ninny State.

    From the article “Paranoia in the playground”:
    “This is a fundamental breach of rights, but almost as serious is the offence to common sense.”

    I’m beginning to think that a lack of common sense is quickly becoming a worldwide mental health pandemic. Unfortunately, there’s no vaccine available for that disease.

  3. 3 Jason 1, October 28, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    The folks over at South Park Studios must be wondering if they are prophets or if the world’s actual insanity has passed their fictional version.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Abduction_Is_Not_Funny

    They did this episode in 2002. It’s about parents panicking over child abduction and doing progressively more idiotic things to protect their kids. Ultimately, after finding out that statistics show that kids are most likely to be taken by a family member, the city’s adults force their children to leave town.

  4. 4 jacksonc 1, October 29, 2009 at 9:51 am

    Actually this has nothing to do with stopping children from roaming round in the street.

    The council runs a couple of facilities where staff run supervised play sessions for children who are dropped off by their parents and collected at the end. The question is whether there should be a general right of parents and adults also to attend these sessions.

    Just as parents are generally not allowed to sit in their children’s classrooms at school or stay with them at scouts or guides etc., there is not a general right for parents and adults generally to attend supervised play sessions for children.

    It doesn’t alter the fact that parents who don’t want supervised sessions and would rather just take their children to the local park, or who can let them go there alone are quite free to do so.

  5. 5 Buddha Is Laughing 1, October 29, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Next up, British children will be taken at birth and raised in government run crèches tended by computers and sexually androgynous trained chimps.

    It’s the only way to keep adults and children separated.

    Think of the children! It’s for their own good.

    Morons.

  6. 6 XD Interface Studios 1, December 4, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    I want to thank you for your website and social media channels which intellectually addresses problems with an over controlling government. I have recently produced a video which examines the possible outcome of such governments. The video took over 4 months to shoot and compile. It was originally made for a video contest but since it matches the content of your website I thought you may be interested in it. Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQmPPJEQwFA&fmt=22

    Sincerely,
    XDinterface Studio


  1. 1 Electronics Awareness – with kids a full time job | Parenting help in Pennsylvania.com Trackback on 1, October 28, 2009 at 8:38 pm
  2. 2 New baby? Don’t forget your partner. | Parenting help in Pennsylvania.com Trackback on 1, October 29, 2009 at 12:23 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 598 other followers