Scientology Book Published In United States After 27 Years

150px-Bare_Faced_Messiah_UK_paperback_coverThere is an interesting story about this month that shows the success of the Church of Scientology in pursuing its signature litigation abuse by hitting critics with lawsuits and injunction motions. One of the chief targets of Scientology lawyers has been “Bare-Faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard,” a British book that has been hounded by the Church in an alleged attempt to keep it out of the United States. If that was the motivation, it worked for 27 years. However, that book has now been published in print this month in the United States and joins “Going Clear” by Lawrence Wright as a “new” account of the life and controversies surrounding Hubbard’s life and creation of his own religion.

The book details what it says were a series of bizarre lies by Hubbard that raises questions of his sanity and pathological tendencies. It explores how Hubbard claimed that he was one of America’s earliest nuclear physicists. He also claimed that he was a medical doctor. In reality, he went to my school, George Washington University, but dropped out. The book also discusses his claim that he spent his childhood breaking horses in Montana and traveling Asia in a quest to find truth among the mystics. None of this the book says was true.

220px-L._Ron_Hubbard_in_1950We previously discussed other books detailing allegations that the Church itself falsified Hubbard’s military service. New Yorker article by Lawrence Wright on the Church of Scientology looked at the alleged heroic war record and severe battle scars claimed by Hubbard. The Church has long maintained that Hubbard was a war hero who was left blind and a ‘hopeless cripple’ at the end of World War II. The story is the basis of Hubbard claim that he healed himself with his own science that later became the basis of Dianetics. When confronted, official Tommy Davis responded with what Wright says were forged documents:

“Eventually, Davis sent us what is called a notice of separation — essentially discharge papers from World War II — along with some photographs of all of these medals that [Hubbard] had won. … At the same time, we finally gained access to Hubbard’s entire World War II records [through a request to the military archives] and there was no evidence that he had ever been wounded in battle or distinguished himself in any way during the war. We also found another notice of separation which was strikingly different than the one that the church had provided.”

What is interesting about such books is that, despite its litigious reputation, the Church officials do not appear to have sued. While I have been a lifetime critic of the rule, you cannot defame the dead. Thus, Hubbard’s family cannot sue on his behalf for these books which accuse him of being the worst form of liar. However, this last allegation suggests that officials have played a role in rewriting history and then misrepresenting facts of Hubbard’s life. They would presumably have a claim if they are identified directly or by implication.

The book by Russell Miller was quickly targeted by the Church which sued to block its printing in the United States. It worked. After two years, Miller’s lawyers gave up and figured that the book could be obtained from foreign publishers. However, Independent US publisher Silvertail Books has decided that it would run the risk of litigation from the Church and print the Bare-Faced Messiah in America. Miller is pulling no punches. He recently is quoted as saying “It’s always been an utter mystery to me that anybody could read Bare-Faced Messiah and then still take Scientology seriously.”

The book joins a growing list of publications recently by high-level defectors who alleged a variety of abuses and potential crimes by Scientology officials. These publications are likely to fuel the existing pressure in Europe where the church is considered by many to be a criminal enterprise or cult rather than a religion.

Of course, one of the tenets created by Hubbard was for followers to avoid reading any criticism of the Church and to shun anyone who questions the religion. That however does not appear the audience for these authors.

Source: NY Post

40 thoughts on “Scientology Book Published In United States After 27 Years

  1. The hallmark of error is censorship of opposing points of view. The reaction of the church toward critics is enough evidence for me. It reminds me of the modern reaction of positivist scientists toward creationists.

  2. While scientology may be a fraud, what religion isn’t? Not much different is that some people believe what they read in a newspaper or see on TV so-called news. Many people are unable to reason and analyze information to test it’s potential accuracy. They rely on others to provide them with the “truth”. That is the job of charlatans and scam artists like Hubbard, as well as political propaganda developers. They are quite successful at their jobs.

  3. Religions are notorious for being anit free speech. The new trend afield in the US and internationally is to silence those who utter any word or phrase that OFFENDS the tender ears of “religious” adherents. Calle it blashemeny laws or “freedom of religion” laws they all result in the same thing silencing anyone who isn’t considered acceptable to the community of believers who happens to be in charge or allowing them to dictate who does and who does not have to follow the law.. The punishment can go from a fine, death or in the US having your employer tell you how to live your life.

    There is a another trend that would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous and that is the one that says if you discuss facts and highlight them you are hating Christians or creationists. There are facts and then there are opinions. You can have your own opinions but not your own facts. Opinions that are based on other opinions and made up facts deserve to be criticized. Criticism is not hate.

  4. When growing up ( still a work in progress) my neighborhood pal belonged to a mainstream church that published quarterly lists of “banned” books and movies that they were not suppose to read or see. Guess what books and movies were on the top of our list? If someone wants to ban a book I want to know why, and what better way than to get a copy to read.

  5. Interesting, but doesn’t Scientology have a strong following? Or I heard that there is a new or reformed version of Scientology? Yes? No?

  6. Scientology is religious fiction. But then I guess that definition could apply to a lot more than just scientology in the magical mystery tour that is the world of religion.

  7. JT, Lord Xenu is bound to comment on this and you will be struck down!

    “…that raises questions of his sanity and pathological tendencies”–Where there questions?

    Actually, this does raise the same questions we have been going over in the political field. Why do people continue to both believe and follow those who tell lies and harm others? What is going on with this? This is not meant as a snide question. It is profound and we need to understand why people will believe things that aren’t true, and in the name of leaders, commit atrocities.

  8. All one has to do, in order to turn narcissistic fascism tendencies of unjust enrichment pursuits into a quarantined ideology; is to simply call it a Religion and/or Political party.

    Wherefore a ubiquitous “we” is created against any of thee, your or me..

  9. Religion which invokes science is like a science which relies on religion– inherently flawed. Now you take rocket science. You have a whole body of so called scientists who think that they can send a man or woman into space and that they will see angels on clouds as they head upward. All they see are little stations on clouds set up by Microsoft and Google. Lately, the news is all about finding the crashed plane somewhere in one or two oceans. It will take an L. Ron to find that plane. And another thing, who would listen to some sap named L. Ron to learn about religion. And who would combine religion with science to begin with. For any of you chumps out there who believe this apCray, get some comic books.

  10. Hey AY;

    On the subject of snakes – Pitten’s is purportedly answering today.
    (As per the deadline order – mutual agree).

    What do you think of all the banter he is going for 2016?

    It’s a coin flip on whether – Or NOT – my case of “Haas v Romney”

    will go forward.

  11. Nick;

    Of course I am. Have been battling him for 13 + years;
    and sued him for RICO (civil) in Los Angeles.

    He responded seeking an extension of time,
    I agreed and the court so Ordered (till April 7th).

    His co-Defendants seek to quash the case;
    and the evidences coming out at trial.

  12. “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” –Voltaire

  13. What a bunch of bollocks! That goes for practically every comment and certainly for Turley, but then Scientology has been his blind spot. Someone sold him a bill of goods about the subject and he’s been loopy about it ever since. You’re talking about a whole bunch of things that really work and make people better in some way. Even includes stuff like assists for injuries & how to study. I don’t care if you call it religion or not. The stuff works so who cares? Hardly one of you guys want to sit still long enough to check it out. You confuse the prolific writings of one amazing man and childishly assume it must be science fiction if the author also wrote a little science fiction. And I did say a little as all his many fiction stories are possibly only 2 per cent of what he wrote.

  14. Correct Paulette

    And “traveling limey” – how many have you cajoled to “buy” books/programs and tapes on the (er) religion of Scientology?

    It is (and I visited the program and parties high up) –

    all about money and gain.

  15. Ron basically brought the successful things we do to our attention. My favorite was the KRC triangle. You lift one corner and the others raise equally.

    K=Knowledge R=Responsibility C=Control – Try it.

    I always thought that this was on a scale of freedom. But remember this can also be used to reduce your freedom. Is there anyone or group out there trying to reduce your knowledge?

    It is a bit of a bother to me that most have not read his work and take all of this on opinions of opinions.

  16. Paulette, that is a great quote. Thanks for sharing it. Of course, Lord Xenu will exact his revenge upon you for it, but still, thanks!

  17. Sorry Limey. They call it a religion. They act like a really nasty religion. Form their own mouths, they are convicted. Its a “religion”. They like it that way all sorts of perks. Pretty soon even more.

  18. How many here know that Earthlink was started by a Scientologist. I used to know a woman who made between 11 and 13 million dollars from her investment in it. Her husband was a lawyer who did work for either Sci. or E;L., or both.
    Check out the facts about E.L. and the fraud that it was alleged to have engaged in —- at least on the part of the founder.

  19. In this country, the full and free right to entertain any religious belief, to practice any religious principle, and to teach any religious doctrine which does not violate the laws of morality and property and which does not infringe personal rights is conceded to all. The law knows no heresy, and is committed to the support of no dogma, the establishment of no sect. The right to organize voluntary religious associations to assist in the expression and dissemination of any religious doctrine, and to create tribunals for the decision of controverted questions of faith within the association and for the ecclesiastical government of all the individual members, congregations, and officers within the general association, is unquestioned.” Watson v. Jones – 80 U.S. 679 (1871)

  20. One of the best ways to keep information from most people is to price it out of everyone’s reach. The price of this book is outrageous more than $200 on amazon. Maybe Miller is trying to raise money for his legal fees.

  21. coming soon, to a bulk rate bin near you. the true story of L Ron Hubbard


    Lettermans top 10 books least likely to make the N Y Times bestseller list.

  22. It seems that Scientology, like Islam, is a religion of totalitarianism. There is no toleration for any ideas, suggestions, or deviations from the principles of reincarnation, infallibility of the boss, or criticism from outside. As a law librarian for 25 years, I was always amazed at how many appellate cases came through brought by Scientology. They never seemed to give much value to the Fair Use Doctrine of the copyright statutes and always seemed to have deep enough pockets to outlast and litigant. Unlike Islam, they can’t kill you, but they can threaten blackmail and totally shun you worse than a Bob Jones Guyana Camp Meeting.

    Perhaps now, the vultures are circling waiting just for the last fall and the burial by the sandstorms of reason and prudence and common sense. Ten Billion Year contracts with children are contrary to public policy anywhere in the globe!

  23. This post is very unclear. The headline says “Scientology Book Published In United States After 27 Years.” That does not appear to be correct if it implies that the book was never published here or has been otherwise unavailable. As a matter of fact, the book was published in the US way back in 1987. It was cataloged by the US Library of Congress at the time of publication and still is listed in its collection, where I found it in the online LOC catalog. The Library receives most copyright deposits and adds many, but not all, to its permanent collection.)

    Tony Sidaway reported on this site in 2011 that the text has been available online for years:

    The post notes that “What is interesting about such books is that, despite its litigious reputation, the Church officials do not appear to have sued.” The publisher was sued back in 1988, however, for copyright infringement rather than defamation, and by a rival publisher, not the church. The litigation was reported at the time: New Era Publications International v. Holt, 685 F.Supp. 1493 (S.D.N.Y. 1988), affirmed in part, reversed in part, 873 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1989), rehearing en banc denied, 873 F.2d 576 (1989). To summarize briefly, both the District and Appeals Courts denied injunctive relief, relegating the copyright claimant to damages. The full details can be found on the web in the cases and in the legal commentary. The publication of the book continued.

    I fail to see how the Church of Scientology, or Hubbard’s heirs would have any valid cause of action against publication of this new edition. The doctrine of the bar against defamation of the deceased has no relevance in the year 2014. The book was published shortly after Hubbard died in 1986, nearly 27 years ago. Any legal action would be barred by all known statutes of limitation in the US, and any equitable action for an injunction would be barred by laches. The Hubbards would have no action today, even if the courts changed the common law rule.

    In my view, Hubbard himself would not have been foolish enough to bring a defamation case on his “war record” even if he had lived. A court case would have led to subpoenas for his authentic military records and to intense discovery, including depositions and affidavits under oath. A lot of his science fiction friends, like Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein, and Sprague deCamp, were still alive to testify to the real events. All three worked together at the Philadelphia Naval Yard in World War II and frequently socialized with Ron. They could have testified on the veracity of Hubbard’s claims.

    The Scientologists later claimed that some part of Hubbard’s military service was part of an off the books mission managed for Naval Intelligence by Robert Heinlein, a retired Navy officer, after the war. This claim, made only after Heinlein died, would have been exploded in court in the 1980s if Heinlein were ever to testify. Hubbard’s defamation claims would have been dismissed as frivolous. Selling puffed up military exploits to hapless prospects for so-called scientology therapy would be one thing. Lying under oath is another. I think a lot of Elron’s “war stories” might have changed or evaporated.

    So, it does not appear that the Church of Scientology sued to suppress the book. That suit was by a rival publisher, and it failed. But the post then says “the book by Russell Miller was quickly targeted by the Church which sued to block its printing in the United States. It worked. After two years, Miller’s lawyers gave up and figured that the book could be obtained from foreign publishers.” The publisher Silvertail Books does not seem to make this claim, but an online poster said “The book’s original US publisher, Henry Holt, became mired in legal problems after a series of lawsuits in the American courts, and the book was never properly published here.”

    Not so true. To repeat, neither the Church of Scientology nor Hubbard or his heirs sued. A rival publisher sued. Miller did not lose, since the courts denied injunctive relief. The book was shipped and sold. It has been on the web for years. This is a new edition. I wish the author extensive sales.

    In the First Amendment marketplace of ideas,the scientologists are free to counter his claims.

    Move along, folks, nothing to see here….

  24. Meanwhile, in Meridian, Idaho:

    I’m actually quite sympathetic to parents, who, for religious reasons don’t want their teens reading subjects and language that make them very uncomfortable. On the other hand, I’m outraged when those same parents tell me what is appropriate for MY teen to read and discuss in class. The district considered and discarded an “opt-out” option and just outright removed the book from its recommended reading list. The book remains in school libraries at district high schools. I’m told by locals that there is a waiting list at each school, now, to read the book. My snarky observation: clever way to get the kids interested in more reading!

Comments are closed.