First Amendment Issue: When is a Noose a Crime?

I used to live in Alexandria Louisiana and I can certainly attest to a few throw backs and racists in that part of the country. However, the arrests yesterday of an adult and a minor for dangling nooses off the back of a pick-up truck raises some very serious first amendment issues. In the controversy over the Jena, La. cases, police appear to have attacked quickly to make the arrest. However, a noose is a symbol of expression for bad or good. It should be protected speech. The case could return the courts to the question of when a burning cross can be prosecuted as hate speech — a very controversial matter recently ruled upon by the Supreme Court (in upholding criminal prosecution for a cross burning on private property).

For the picture of the nooses and the full story, click here

One thought on “First Amendment Issue: When is a Noose a Crime?”

  1. To begin, it should be stated that Colloidal Silver is not new, and neither could possibly be the
    knowing near to the healing components of Silver.
    I also searched the various medical science news sites (even the
    ones that are routinely critical of silver) and couldn’t find any references to it causing artery problems. One explanation is based on the nature of enzyme construction: specific enzymes are required for a given biochemical activity to take place.

Comments are closed.