Court Throws Jesus Christ Out of Court as Disruptive

For those who have fought to introduce religious symbols like the Bible and the Ten Commandments in courthouses in Alabama (here and here), the decision of Judge Clyde Jones could not be more poignant. This week the Birmingham judge literally threw out Jesus Christ from the courtroom. That is the name adopted by Dorothy Lola Killingworth, who appeared as a juror but proceeded to be as disruptive as her namesake in temple market.

Jesus Christ, 59, attracted considerable attention when her name was called out and Jesus Christ was called to come forward. The problem is that she kept asking questions instead of answering them — a perfectly rabbinical habit.

The judge threw her out of court, though he did not require that she wear a sign reading “Here is the King of the Jurors” and he did not symbolically wash his hands of the matter.

Of course, not only did the other Jesus often answer questions with questions but he was known to cause a ruckus on occasion.

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves.

For the story, click here.

11 thoughts on “Court Throws Jesus Christ Out of Court as Disruptive”

  1. Pingback: credit restoration
  2. Well is it unconstitutional if No Lawyer Will Represent me and is the Mayflower Compact; A prior constutional debt and engagment valid against the constitution of these united states?

  3. Its Marsha Mike; I am the Plaintiff; and I really need a Lawyer now. Has anyone ever come forth claiming to be Satan, in the Flesh or pro se? Can anyone prove that Im not? Ill even promise to put my hand on the Bible; and tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God; this time. As God is my only witness; I didnt do half of the stuff people blamed on me.

    Due to my strange views mMy complaint is about Religion, Race, Ancestry, Gender, and Employment (RAGE) discrimination. I am also part Native American Indian woman. Prior to the 1st Amen, Land Rights and Blessing were bestowed from Mother to Daughter. This is unlike the Father, Son and Holy Spirit religion we have now; that doesnt recognized the female in the Trinity, as a Goddess or Holy Hostess.

    I dont Think Title VII covers the fact due to the word no; Women have been escheat, entrapped and statutorily raped from having the same laws of nature and nature’s God. I contend the word no A Just Cause to: Abort, Dissolve and Throwoff that White Christian body of Government men for failing to Affirm, their Affinity with Godly laws, Enforce or Uphold any of their oaths.

    Satan’s Declaration of Independence; When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands….yada dyada yada.

    We hold these truth to be self evident that all men are created equal, and 1st by GOD who created women second, or next making them better, greater and a Beta to them.

    Alls I can say now is FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY I WAS BORN FREE BLACK AND LAST CAUSE Time IS Almost UP; So if I were you Id drop down to my knees like the cowardly lion of Oz. Id believe in Ghost, Jesus Christ and FEAR GOD to the utmost as a woman scorned. One GOD who both our father and mother and whose been in charge of Heaven, Earth and Hell all along. In fact our Father in Heaven is So Black and Fat, even Jesus Christ himself calls Her our Fat Her who art in heaven.

  4. Martha Christ,
    Are you sure Orly Taitz isn’t representing the Plaintiff? The legal reasoning has dare I say a “Taitzian” ring to it.

  5. There is a case in Maryland’s US District Court filed by a woman claiming she is Satan in the flesh of a regular Christian citizen. So therefore she is the Daughter of GOD, Sister Spirit and Espoused Bride of Jesus Christ. She is suing her employer for Racial Discrimination relating to her Religion, Ancestry, Politics and Ethinicity viewpoints. Further claiming the word “no” in the 1st AMENdment is an Anticipatory Tort, Breach of Contract and Promises of the oaths sworn on the Bible. Further since woman were not allowed to Vote and the Courts used the King James Holy Bible to affirm oaths, Satan wants to use the Bible as a fully legal binding contract and promise passed down to US under the wills of our forefathers.

    Satan needs legal representation because she is claiming the word no denies We The People a choice to have the same laws of nature and natures GOD our forefathers enjoyed; and therefore the word No in the 1st Amendment should be replaced to read as follows.

    “Congress shall make law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibit the free exerices thereof; but NO law abridging etc..

    So if Satan can prove damages caused by the word no in the 1st Amendment would she be entitled to 1/3 credit of our legal tender or cent that has In GOD We trust Depicted on it? Plus 2/3 credit for the alienation of affection, discrimination, lible and slander caused by the Christians.

  6. I suppose the judge washed his hands of the whole affair … especially after Jesus wept.

  7. Amen, Amen I say unto thee. Ask for Darkness to set you free. I like her way of getting out of Jury Service. NOT

Comments are closed.