San Diego Superior Court Judge John Einhorn has found a way to reduce his caseload. District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis has told prosecutors to block any criminal cases that go before the judge. Yet, when asked about the boycott, Dumanis insists that Einhorn is a “well-respected jurist” — just a jurist whom she doesn’t want to rule on any criminal case.
Under state law, prosecutors are allowed to exercise a peremptory challenge to a judge and Dumanis has ordered Einhorn struck from every criminal case. She has never explained to him or the public why her office is boycotting a particular judge.
For the full story, click here.
Correspondingly, a health be bothered attorney self employed provides important advice, especially at what time a certain unwearied is a victim of abuse before medical malpractice. Fbefore persons people who suffered terrible injuries plus illness commencing an incorrect plus improper medical professional, this is the best way headed fbefore get retribution. Furthermore, medical self employed malpractice bottle cause permanent plus long term wound headed fbefore the group of patients. clothed in most cases, victims frequently want fair dealing representing this malpractice.
Does this mean no Jury Duty? They are sending me those notices all the time!
I hope it’s gonna get through
Damantis,
That IS a good approach. But its time for a new DA. Hopefully we can get one by the end of the year.
@Buddha is laughing. One should never turn one’s back on anyone in the gay community as that leaves one open to a rear attack.
Now it’s time to find another candidate for San Diego DA. There is at least one effort underway now…
http://bonniedamantis.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/candidate-wanted-district-attorney-for-the-county-of-san-diego/
Pledge your support to help find another candidate…
http://bonniedamantis.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/financialpledge-for-district-attorney-of-san-diego/
damatis,
That sound like a good approach.
Judge Einhorn has already been approached, reports say he has declined and is planning to retire from the bench.
We are desperately searching for a replacement. Got ideas for a new San Diego DA? Please post them here, we’ll make contact for you! Time’s running out.
San Diego Courts find Bonnie Dumanis “unstable”. . . From personally suicidal in the 1980’s to professionally suicidal today, San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis has proven to be consistently unstable. According to a report released by…READ MORE @ http://bonniedamantis.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/bonnie-dumanis-is-unstable/
I like the ideas of the spurned judge running for the DA’s job. That would be a great campaign to follow!
From the comments at the source:
“We need a new district attorney. We currently have a corrupt District Attorney who manipulates the law, has given the police department a blanket liscence to kill, and has turned her back on the needs of the gay community.
Bonnie is a tyrant who will use endless amounts of tax money to avenge her enemies. Think pepper spray of political opponents, and fraud charges of relatives who dare to run against her. Bonnie would have done well in Hitler’s third reich.
Maybe judge Einhorn should run for D.A.
I think he could expose more of the wrongdoings of Bonnie Dumanis than the dozens of people she has calculatedly destroyed with her abuse of power.”
Flipkid, you have a gift for understatement.
For an example of how Bonnie Dumanis handles cases involving rogue cops, see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Foley_(linebacker)#Shooting_incident
This is, sadly, not an isolated incident in San Diego. The citizens of this city are not safe under her stewardship.
As for her beef with Einhorn, I don’t know what that’s specifically about, but I know he’s challenged her office many, many times before.
Ok, what’s the real story. Do we have an election coming up? A bad date between the 2? I think the DA is abusing her authority.
Wow. If you read the comments by “locals” at the end of the article, DA Dumanis is not very highly thought of by her constituants. Claims of “circumventing the law”, ignoring truth for a verdict, etc.