After pledging to kill our enemies, Newt Gingrich returned to one of his favorite themes: violating the United States Constitution. In Greenville, South Carolina, Gingrich again said that he would ignore Supreme Court decisions that he disagreed with. We have previously discussed the flaws in Gingrich’s legal and historical views, but my concern is that pledging to violate the Constitution would make Gingrich an enemy of our constitutional system. Does this mean that his first act would be to add his own name to the presidential hit list?
Gingrich told the crowd “The president interprets the Constitution as president. If the court makes a fundamentally wrong decision, president can in fact ignore the courts.”
The question is what threatens our nation the most, destroying a building or a constitutional system? With President Obama continuing the claim of absolute power to kill Americans, the added claim to ignore the check and balance of judicial review would complete our shift toward authoritarian powers.
For Gingrich to pledge to attack the Constitution while pledging to kill enemies of our country seems a textbook case of autophobia. It raises the question of what constitutes an enemy to our system.
A personality disorder is defined as an “enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectation of the individual’s culture, is pervasive and inflexible (unlikely to change), is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment in interpersonal relationships.” Legally, a pledge to kill enemies and then declare oneself an enemy to core principle of the country constitutes a serious and a dangerous disorder in a president.
Source: CBS
I an scared! 🙂
If the person is related to Vinnie the Swinger on the code as someone has found out, then that person has been able to get away with harming many people on this blog. It has happened too many times to continue to be swept under the rug.
gene, I would like to know for safety reasons for my family and myself who this person is.
If all parties involved consent, I’ll answer the question.
What I’d rather is that you all simply stop it.
Gene H, Why don’t you answer it? Blouise and I were discussing transparency just recently.
“There is a psychotic person off of Meds on here that will make your life hell from what I have read. I have looked back almost 3 months and have decided a few absolutes. Some people have no boundaries in communicating on here. I feel for the family unit as a whole if this is how the act when they are basically unknown.” –Not As Insane
Not As Insane,
As a nurse, I’ve seen a whole lot of crazy… I could write a book on crazy.
Not As Insane? Well..
As an editor, I could answer this question.
All I’ll say is more than two people would be surprised by the answer.
SwM,
😉
LK It is a dead giveaway. lol
Glad you talk to your kids maybe someday they will want to see you but never say anything about me and my family again.
Some people have no boundaries in communicating on here. I feel for the family unit as a whole if this is how the act when they are basically unknown.” (Not as Insane)
—
Apparently not even the generally accepted boundaries of syntax and spelling.
🙂
Blouise, Just more lies…..Not Insane matches Vinnie de Swinger as we know. When people start impugning my family, that is it…. There is nothing to reveal about me but there is a boatload on google about you, Insane AY.
loaded question (ˈlō-did ˈkwes-CHən), ph. (coll., id.); “Is the psychotic person for or against Ron Paul?”
rhetorical response (rəˈtôrikəl riˈspäns), ph. (coll., id.); “You don’t have to be crazy to work here, but it helps.”
“There is a psychotic person off of Meds on here that will make your life hell from what I have read. I have looked back almost 3 months and have decided a few absolutes. Some people have no boundaries in communicating on here. I feel for the family unit as a whole if this is how the act when they are basically unknown.” (Not as Insane)
Who is the ” psychotic person off of Meds on here that will make your life hell from what I have read.”
Interesting accusation, Not as Insane.
Is the psychotic person for or against Ron Paul?
FYI,
I am “Not As Insane”…I suppose it could be anyone…..I do not know anyone by the name of Catherine….But I do have a large contingent of folks that know me and who I am……But who am I to say what they can or cannot do…….I am not responsible for what they do….I think that they have made a decision based upon what they have heard and read….Oh well…
Swarthmore,
the trouble with Newt’s “conversion” is that he is on his 3rd wife. How many conversions can one liar have?
“I’m sticking with my prediction and hoping I’m wrong because he would have a good chance of winning.” (Mike S)
Aargh! Sssh … he would pull all those Republicans out of their house come November.
Well I’m a big Ron supporter but I dont like all his positions, and there’s crazy people everywhere so I just try to add to the conversation, and have sound opinions
I have yet to disclose any personal information about you…..So, please leave me alone….I will enjoy having a conversation with anyone you send my way….Just be careful in what you wish….It may just happen….
FYI…A miracle has happened and I have a great relationship with the kiddo…I talk to them everyday now…Thanks for the concern….Time does heel all wounds…and does wound all heels….
A friend of mine, a retired professor has said he’d monitor this site…I suppose he might be lurking…We talked about it last evening…You know him….
This is not AY. I am aware of this dispute. I am aware of you only because I overheard you speak very unkindly about some people I know. It is wise to heed ones own advice.