Lawsuit Details Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct In New York Murder Case

We often discussed the lack of deterrent for prosecutorial misconduct in the United States. When cases are overturned due to destruction or withholding of evidence or other violations, few reporters track down the original prosecutors to hold them accountable. Prosecutors are rarely punished for such acts. The article below in the New York Times details a shocking example of alleged misconduct and the lack of action by the Queens District Attorney in dealing with what appears gross violations by prosecutors in the office.


The case from 2000 involves Petros Bedi who was convicted of killing a man at a nightclub and given a sentence of 42 1/2 years in prison. The key witness was Seraphim Koumpouras who looked like another purchased snitch. Prosecutors often hand out deals to inmates or arrested individuals to testify in cases. These witnesses will suddenly appear and say that the defendant spontaneously confessed to them in some prison yard to a killing.

In the case of Koumpouras, the defense attorney suspected that he was given money and other benefits after his arrest to shape his testimony. He was repeatedly asked in court whether his hotel bill was paid for by the prosecutor; whether he and his girlfriend have been living for months on the government’s tab; whether he received money from the prosecutors. With the prosecutors from the Queens District Attorney sitting there, he denied it all. He was reportedly lying but the prosecutors never told the jury or the judge.

It turns out that the district attorney’s office in paid Koumpouras, $16,640 for hotel bills and gave him about $3,000 in cash. Indeed, they paid him money just days before his testimony.

His defense counsel has produced a witness who says that another man committed the crime. He has also detailed some 70 other cases of prosecutorial misconduct in New York. In Queens, District Attorney Richard A. Brown, has disciplined just one lawyer for misconduct.

The office has only said that it will fight the lawsuit vigorously.

By the way, the final payment (or tip?) has handed over to Koumpouras on his way out of the courthouse. Prosecutors gave him $100 and sent him on his way.

Source: NYT

27 thoughts on “Lawsuit Details Alleged Prosecutorial Misconduct In New York Murder Case”

  1. I got this web site from my buddy who shared with
    me concerning this web site and now this time I am browsing this website and reading very informative articles or reviews at this
    place.

  2. Today, considering the fast lifestyle that everyone is having, credit cards have a huge demand in the economy. Persons coming from every field are using the credit card and people who are not using the credit card have lined up to apply for even one. Thanks for revealing your ideas on credit cards.

  3. Just out of curiosity, is there a function in TV sets that allow you to be cnnstantly fed the same series whichever channel it might be appearing in for the moment?

    Knowing our love of series there probably is. Will it keep
    track of ones you’ve seen and mark your favos so any repeats will be advised on the screen for when you are in the mood for a repeat?
    Ah, the marvels of electronics.

    Is it equipped with a sedition/subversion tracker and terror tendence detector which reports directly to the FBI too?

    Ah, th emarvels of Big Brother.

  4. Are there any “Law and Order” fans here? We leave the TV on to provide background noise and apparently L&O runs about 24/7 here and there across the TV spectrum.

    I generally watch that show with horror when I just sit down to mindlessly stare at whatever is on. Talk about propaganda. I will even ‘argue’ with that show on occasion. The prosecutors use every dirty trick in the book and cause serious collateral damage as they go about their job and it’s all presented as a holy quest for justice. There is a whole generation raised on that prosecutorial skulduggery and authoritarinism presented as something virtuous.

    Unfortunately, most of the tactics used are legal, judges don’t mess with prosecutors, and there’s a dearth of punishment in the real world when prosecutors cross the line into lawbreaking. Being a prosecutor is a springboard for political office, or at least a serious plus on a candidates resume so there is always pressure to crank out convictions. That’s one of the reasons, possibly the major reason that prosecutorial discretion is in such disrepair. How many cases on this blawg cause someone to comment that prosecutorial discretion should have been used?

Comments are closed.