Submitted by Elaine Magliaro, Guest Blogger
As a former public school educator, I have been following what has been going on with school reform in this country. I have written posts about some of the groups and individuals involved in the current reform movement (here), the push to privatize public schools (here), school vouchers (here and here), and charter schools (here and here). Despite all the research that I’ve done on the subject, I hadn’t been aware until recently that there are many publicly funded charter schools across this country that have religious affiliations.
In December 2011, Tiffany Gee Lewis (Deseret News) wrote that there had been a “veritable explosion of charter schools over the past two decades.” She noted that a number of the schools that were riding this charter trend were “founded or authorized” by religious and cultural organizations. As she said, the subject of religion in public schools “has always been a hot-button topic.” She added that “the rise of charter schools that tie themselves to a certain ethnic or religious group introduces a new shade of complication to public schooling.”
According to Jessica Meyers of The Dallas Morning News, “Church-charter partnerships are springing up across the country as private institutions lose funding and nontraditional education models grow in popularity. Their emergence prompts questions about the role religious groups should play in the development of publicly funded schools.” She added, “Critics fear the fuzzy division means taxpayers are footing the bill for religious instruction.”
Meyer wrote the following with regard to charter schools in the state of Texas:
Charter schools are public schools run by private groups and approved by the State Board of Education. They are freed of many state rules. But they must adhere to the state’s accountability tests and maintain a separation of church and state. Religious groups may apply to open a charter school if they establish a separate nonprofit to receive state funds.
Even with a middleman, heavy overlap exists between the school and the religious group that supports it. Dozens of Texas charter school leaders or board members hold prominent positions in the church, where the schooling sometimes takes place. Parochial schools reinvent themselves as charters, often with little guidance on running a public school. And the mission of the school itself typically stems from the values of the religious group.
These close ties stir concern that churches will use state funds to bolster their coffers. In Houston, the Rev. Harold Wilcox and several church members were indicted six years ago for embezzling federal and state funds through Prepared Table Charter School. Wilcox paid himself a $210,000 annual salary to run the school and received $68,000 in rent for classes held in his Baptist church sanctuary.
Morgan Smith reported in The New York Times this past August that auditors for the Texas Education Agency had found that state money had been used inappropriately in some cases where charter schools were housed in churches. The agency discovered that the superintendent of a charter school in San Antonio “had used school funds to buy a former church.” The superintendent then “leased that building to the school she led.” Jack Ammons, who spent fifteen years auditing public schools across Texas as a monitor for the education agency, “said he found it was ‘nearly impossible’ for charter schools operating out of church facilities to avoid spending state funds on students in ways that also benefited the church.”
The majority of charter schools with religious ties are run by right-wing evangelical Christians—but, as Susan Jacoby wrote in The Washington Post, “…Catholics, Jews and Muslims are also getting a piece of the action.” (You can add Scientologists into the mix, too.) Meyers reported that Houston’s Harmony Public Schools “are run by Turkish Muslims who embody the philosophies of a popular imam.” She also noted that “Students at Ben Gamla Charter School in Florida eat kosher food in the cafeteria and learn Hebrew.”
Tiffany Gee Lewis:
Money largely explains why religious organizations get involved in the charter school movement because it allows them to establish a school that teaches the culture of their beliefs without the financial overhead of a private school. The most drastic example of this was in 2008, when the Archbishop Donald Wuerl converted a number of failing Catholic private schools into charter schools in Washington, D.C.
Dan Quinn, communications director for the advocacy group Texas Freedom Network, also spoke of the recent trend of religious schools “converting to charter schools.” He added that the process is legal but raises questions “about how students get accepted into the school and if there is follow-up from the state.”
Morgan Smith said that some educators—as well as other people—are questioning “whether the schools receive the proper oversight to ensure that religious groups are not benefiting from taxpayer dollars intended for public school students — or that faith-based instruction is not entering those classrooms.” According to Smith, many charter schools that are partnered with religious institutions “have cropped up in cities across Texas since the charter school system was established in 1995.” In fact, 16 of the 23 charter contracts that have been awarded by the state in the past three years have gone to schools with religious ties.
Writing for The Washington Post in 2010, Susan Jacoby said that “charter school promoters with specific religious and cultural agendas around the country are using every possible means to skirt the First Amendment and obtain public support for private aims.”
Advantage Academy
In November 2010, Jessica Meyers wrote a newspaper article about Advantage Academy in Duncanville, Texas. She said the students at this school “follow biblical principles, talk openly about faith and receive guidance from a gregarious former pastor who still preaches when he speaks.” She said Advantage Academy is typical of the “latest breed of charter schools”—those “born from faith-based principles and taxpayer funds.” She added, “Advantage markets its teaching of creationism and intelligent design. It offers a Bible class as an elective and encourages personal growth through hard work and ‘faith in God and country.’”
The academy’s founder Allen Beck is a former pastor for Assemblies of God who “hopes to instill morals and ethics in students as they learn to count and read.” Beck was quoted as saying, “America is in a battle between secularity and biblical thinking. I want to fuse the two together in a legal way.”
iSchool High
In his Salon article titled Darwin Inspired Hitler: Lies They Teach in Texas, Jonny Scaramanga tells the story of an engineer named Joshua Bass whose son attended iSchool High, a Houston charter school. Bass and his wife had hoped their son would receive a good college prep education at iSchool High. They were taken aback one day when their son returned home after school with “anti-science” books that were “apparently religiously motivated.” One book implied that Darwin’s theory of evolution had inspired Hitler’s plan to eliminate certain groups of people:
[Hitler] has written that the Aryan (German) race would be the leader in all human progress. To accomplish that goal, all “lower races” should either be enslaved or eliminated. Apparently the theory of evolution and its “survival of the fittest” philosophy had taken root in Hitler’s warped mind.
Scaramanga wrote that “attacks on science in the classroom were unacceptable” to Joshua Bass. Bass decided to investigate ResponsiveEd, the curriculum that was used at iSchool High. He discovered that “ResponsiveEd was founded by Donald R. Howard, former owner of ACE (Accelerated Christian Education). ACE is a fundamentalist curriculum that teaches young-Earth creationism as fact.”
Scaramanga added:
ResponsiveEd is the latest in a long line of concerns raised over the religious affiliations of charter schools. Civil libertarians have raised concerns over Jewish schools converting to charter status. In 2010, more than 20 percent of Texas charter schools reportedly had a religious affiliation. And ResponsiveEd aims to expand further.
Imagine that—more than 20% of the charter schools in the Lone Star State have some form of religious ties.
Tax payer funding of charter schools with religious affiliations doesn’t sit well with everyone. According to Don Byrd (Baptist Joint Committee), “these publicly funded institutions are raising significant church-state challenges, both for the religious organization and the state trying to administer oversight.”
Shekinah Learning Institute
“Dr.” Cheryl A. Washington is the superintendent and founder of Shekinah Learning Institute, a group of thirteen charter schools in Texas “that receive $17 million in taxpayer dollars to educate 2,500 ‘at risk’ students.” In a radio interview with Rhema Gospel Express one day, Washington said, “I know it’s part of my nature to bust a move and take a risk. So what’s in me, when it’s imparted into the youth that I serve, then they become those future entrepreneurs that will not be afraid to take a risk…and know that they can do all things through Christ.” During the same interview, Washington said that operating the schools was a “divine assignment.” According to the San Antonio Current, Washington has claimed that God “has given [her] the jurisdiction to operate with dominion.”
In 2012, Americans United accused Washington of “violating the separation of church and state by secretly funneling religion into public classrooms.” Americans United alleged the institute’s Truth Campus in Dallas had instructed students to bring a Bible and notepad to school and that it “operates as if it were a publicly funded religious institution.”
In Showdown At Shekinah: A Church, A Charter School And Church-State Chicanery (June 2012), Simon Brown of Americans United wrote the following about Truth Campus:
Evidence gathered as of press time indicated that the school promoted weekly chapel services, offered weekly Bible study classes and used a religious name and logo, all of which could be violations of the Constitution’s First Amendment.
In Feb. 27 letters to Washington and the Texas Education Agency, Americans United Senior Litigation Counsel Gregory M. Lipper detailed the constitutionally problematic behavior and demanded that these activities stop.
On the Truth Campus’s website, Lipper notes, the organization said it is a public school that is “100% funded by the state of Texas.” Yet Americans United found that the school offers an optional weekly chapel service for its students. A promotional video on the website featured parents explaining how the chapel services teach students “about all the wonderful things that God is doing for them in their lives.” (The Truth Campus website has since been removed from the Internet.)
Note: A WOAI investigation discovered that two doctorate degrees touted by Washington are fakes. “When asked by WOAI in a TV interview why she still chose to use the doctorate title, Washington replied ‘Why not?’”
Life Force Arts and Technology Academy in Florida
Life Force Arts and Technology Academy is a charter school located in Dunedin, Florida. The school, which was established in 2009, receives about $800,000 in public funding annually. Life Force is run by a small Clearwater company called Art of Management, which was “hired to reorganize the school as it filed for bankruptcy.” Hanan Islam, the company president, is also executive director of World Literacy Crusade—an organization that promotes Scientology study methods. When Islam’s company assumed control of operations at Life Force, she assured parents that her group would “not push any religion” at the school.
Some parents of students who attend the school—as well as some former teachers—feel betrayed. They claim that the school “has become a Scientology recruiting post targeting children.” The charter school, which serves low-income students, had advertised its classes in computer and modern dance—but at some point began pushing L. Ron Hubbard’s “study technology.” Critics of the school call the study technology “a Trojan horse Scientology uses to infiltrate public classrooms.” In 2011, students at the school attended a Christmas party at a Scientology church “where they were given Scientology books and DVDs.”
Drew Harwell (Tampa Bay Times—February 26, 2012) wrote that “while Life Force students and teachers worked in poorly stocked classrooms and teachers went unpaid, the bankrupt school funneled tens of thousands of dollars more to Islam’s business interests than she told the bankruptcy court she would charge.”
Tampa Bay Times:
“There can be no accountability when this kind of stuff goes on,” said teacher Tim Roach, who said he was fired from Life Force last month after criticizing the school. “It’s the students who are going to suffer.”
Though mixing public education with religious doctrine is not allowed by the Pinellas County School District, which oversees charter schools, the district has been stymied in attempts to close Life Force because it is under bankruptcy protection.
Ben Gamla Schools in Florida
Peter Deutsch is a former six-term Democratic congressman from Florida. Deutsch, an Orthodox Jew and current resident of Israel, is the founder of and the “driving force” behind the Ben Gamla Hebrew-language charter schools whose curriculum “includes Israel education and Jewish history.” Most of the schools are located on Jewish community campuses. “Supplementary after-school religious programs take place onsite or nearby.” Approximately 85 percent of the schools’ students are Jewish.
In a Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) article titled Jewish public schools? Hebrew charter franchises offer radically different models, author Uriel Heliman wrote the following:
Most of the Ben Gamla schools are purposely situated on Jewish federation campuses. The Boynton Beach school is located on the second floor of a synagogue. The Ben Gamla high school in Plantation recently hired an Orthodox rabbi, Chaim Albert, as its principal.
The Ben Gamla schools are now under investigation because of a statement made by Deutsch in an interview with Uriel Heilman for JTA this past July. During the interview, Deutsch indicated that tax payer money that funds Ben Gamla schools is being used “mostly to benefit the local Jewish community.” Heilman said that the former US congressman hopes the schools will help give “Jewish kids who otherwise would attend public school an opportunity to be in a Jewish environment and develop a Jewish identity — at taxpayer expense.”
Heilman wrote that Deutsch was “unabashed about using public money to support what he describes as Jewish identity-building.” He added that Deutsch told him that 80% of Ben Gamla’s collective budget of $10 million “serves Jewish communal purposes.”
From the Miami Herald (10/28/13):
… Deutsch’s Ben Gamla schools have racked up hefty public funding — more than $10 million for nearly 1,800 students last school year alone.
In Broward, where the English-Hebrew charter schools have stirred the most controversy, Ben Gamla raked in $7.2 million from the state for five charter schools that operate at two sites, in Hollywood and Plantation. Those schools served more than 1,200 students.
A Ben Gamla school in the Kendall area of Miami-Dade received approximately $1.4 million from the state for 241 students last school year. Another Ben Gamla charter school in Palm Beach County received $1.7 million in state funds for 280 students.
According to Americans United, this isn’t the first time that Ben Gamla schools “have faced scrutiny for church-state concerns.” Last year, after visiting the schools, Jewish Week reported, “When it comes to church-state separation, these schools adhere strictly to the letter of the law. However, they arguably push as close to the border of what’s allowable as possible, and some of their practices might raise a few eyebrows.”
Minnesota Charter School Sued by ACLU
In January 2009, ACLU of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TiZA), a charter school that emphasizes the culture of the Middle East, and the Minnesota Department of Education. The ACLU argued that the school, which is supported by tax funds from the State of Minnesota and the federal government, had “repeatedly violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution by using taxpayer money to illegally promote religion.” A federal district court in the state ruled that the ACLU had standing to challenge TiZA.
ACLU of Minnesota released hundreds of documents in its case against TiZA, which is now closed, in October of 2011. At that time, Chuck Samuelson—the ACLU-MN director—said, “There is an overwhelming amount of documented evidence — by people who testified under oath in here — that these facts are as we have alleged they were.” Samuelson claimed the released documents “vindicate what his organization has been saying all along, namely that TiZA ‘illegally transferred money to its religious landlords, promoted Islam through its Arabic curriculum and its connection to the after-school religious program, and used taxpayer funds in excess of $1 million to renovate buildings to the benefit of their religious landlords.’”
According to Americans United, the legal dispute over the role of Islam in the school has been partially settled. “Under the terms of the settlement, education officials in Minnesota have agreed to more closely monitor charter schools to make certain they are not promoting religion. In addition, Islamic Relief, the organization that sponsored the school, has agreed to pay the ACLU more than $260,000 in attorneys’ fees.”
“I think the ACLU wants other [charter school] sponsors to know that sponsoring a religious school can be an expensive proposition,” said Peter Lancaster, an attorney who had worked on the case for ACLU.
**********
What are your thoughts on tax payer money being used to fund public charter schools with religious affiliations?
SOURCES
Darwin Inspired Hitler: Lies They Teach in Texas (Salon)
Religious Charter Schools Try Balancing Act in Texas (Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty)
Court Grants Standing in Challenge to Minnesota Charter School (Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty)
Charter schools with ties to religious groups raise fears about state funds’ use (Dallas News)
Funds misuse, nepotism feared at Texas charter schools (Dallas News)
Church, state, school: Texas charters with religious ties (Houston Chronicle)
Trying to Keep Religion Out of the Charter School Classroom (The Texas Tribune/NY Times)
When Charter Schools Are in Churches, Conflict Is in the Air (New York Times)
Texas Charter Schools Allegedly Funneling Religion Into Lessons (TPM Muckraker)
Showdown At Shekinah: A Church, A Charter School And Church-State Chicanery (Americans United)
Lawsuit Over Islamic Charter School In Minn. Reaches Partial Settlement (Americans United)
Charter For Controversy: Often Touted As A Breakthrough In ‘Educational Choice,’ Charter Schools Instead Are Raising Church-State Problems Around The Country (Americans United)
One of every five Texas charter schools has religious ties (Journal Sentinel)
Public Charter School or Public Christian School? (Texas Freedom Network)
Turkish charter schools growing as some question cleric ties (Boston Globe)
ACLU of Minnesota v. TiZA, et al. (ACLU)
Religion A Big Part Of The Charter School Debate (NPR)
Cheryl Washington, Texas Shekinah Learning Institute Charter Founder, Teaches Religion In School, Americans United Alleges (Huffington Post)
Church-state watchdog claims local taxpayer-funded charter school more parochial than public (San Antonio Current)
Controversy over Scientology influence clouds future of Pinellas charter school (Tampa Bay Times)
Charter school dangers on display in Scientology case (Tampa Bay Times)
Many charter schools continue to defy church-state separation (Washington Post)
Can religion, charter schools coexist?: Number of ‘religious charter schools’ continues to grow — along with criticism (Deseret News)
ACLU releases hundreds of documents in TiZA case (Minnesota Public Radio)
Largest charter network in U.S.: Schools tied to Turkey (Washington Post)
Charter Schools Tied to Turkey Grow in Texas (New York Times)
Church-State Separation Issue at Hollywood’s Ben Gamla Charter School Revived After Comments by Founder (NBC Miami)
After career in Congress, Peter Deutsch finds new life in Israel (Jewish Telegraphic Agency/JTA)
Jewish public schools? Hebrew charter franchises offer radically different models (Jewish Telegraphic Agency/JTA)
Ben Gamla charter schools take in millions in public funds as founder lives half a world away (Miami Herald)
Hollywood Board to Review if Ben Gamla Charter School Violates Separation of Church and State (Broward Palm Beach)
Fla. Hebrew Charter School Under Investigation For Church-State Violations (Americans United)
Holy fraud.
I’m reading “A Christian Nation”, very apropo.
davidbluefish,
I attended parochial schools from first through twelfth grade. I had the Sisters of Notre Dame as teachers. Burning in hell for missing Mass also scared the stones out of me. When I was in the early elementary grades, I feared for my father, too, because he rarely attended church on Sunday.
There is one good thing that came from my attending rigid parochial schools–that’s where I met my husband and many of my closest friends–who are all wonderful people.
Elaine, I have a twofer here.
I went to a catholic grammar school. The Baltimore catechism scared the stones out of me. Burning in hell for missing mass (or wailing in purgatory) was a threat that manifested itself into a terror that I as a youngster accepted and dealt with in self lowering ways. If I could not be a true servant of God then obviously I was not a worthy person. Surprise! I was quite normal, (I know now), but being a normal kid makes one somewhat less in the eyes of the “high and mighty”. …. Damned to hell for all eternity, because I was normal. Yeech!!
Then I went to a Jesuit high school. I have high regard for the education that was offered there at that time. My theology classes were not based on the B catechism (thank God 😮 ) We discussed meaning, relevance, goodness, etc. Hellfire and Damnation were not involved.
We had a number of non-catholic students, they were not required to take theology. My limited and anecdotal view of high school is, a great education can be had when one has great teachers whose primary purpose is to educate. My Jesuit education did not create a fear of God in me. I am a 99.99999…..% atheist, I have no fear of God.
…..and Tony Viera, I have no hate of God. PEACE
firefly,
Newark private school is first to use N.J. law to become charter school
By Jessica Calefati/The Star-Ledger
10/1/12
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/10/newark_parochial_school_is_fir.html
Excerpt:
NEWARK — When St. Philip’s Academy opens its doors next fall, it will have have the same staff and the same students, but a different name — Philip’s Academy Charter School.
The Newark school is the first in the state to take advantage of a law allowing private and parochial schools to become charter schools that are financed with taxpayer dollars and beholden to state education standards, the state Department of Education announced late Monday night.
“We are deeply committed to ensuring that every student in New Jersey has access to a high-quality public school that is a good fit for them, and we strongly support charter schools as one public school option for underserved students,” Education Commissioner Chris Cerf said.
Gov. Chris Christie signed the law allowing private and parochial schools to become privately run, publicly funded charter schools in November 2011 with bi-partisan support from the Legislature. He did not, however, have the blessings of the state’s Catholic church leaders.
David, we’re having a discussion. The dynamic is driven by the differences of view. Provocative yes. The marketplace of ideas yes. American yes. I’m having fun. The exchange is useful. At least for me. I just wish Gene H. wouldn’t always get so mad at me.
Tony V.,
Your logical fallacy is that this is not a courtroom or deposition. This is a blog, and every blog I know of that allows anonymous comments have at least a few rules. Blogs all across the political spectrum, from extreme right to extreme left, have made “outing” the meatworld identity of a commenter a bannable offense. It has happened on the Turley blog, and I am aware it has happened on RedState and Daily Kos.
On Daily Kos, sockpuppet accounts will get a poster banned. When you select a username, you better like it, because you are stuck with it. However, some posters have chosen to change the username, and if there is some good reason, they can appeal to the admins and get it changed. Some simply re-register and make a new account under their real name, but once that is done, you cannot go back to the old pseudonymous account without notifying the administrators you are doing it and why, otherwise it is sockpuppetry.
On the Turley blog, the rules are a lot more lax, and several popular commenters have created sockpuppet identities as a joke, but that is always temporary, and little secret is made of it. What a user cannot do, is to steal somebody else’s username and pretend to be them. That is one of the few behaviors on this blog that will bring down the banhammer if they are caught.
As for a user who may have been “out” at one time, but now chooses to post under a pseudonym, there is plenty of precedent for that. One of the most common reasons is to insulate the identity so as not to cause a problem with an employer or political activity. I posted under the OS identity on Daily Kos for years, keeping it when I started commenting here. The reason was professional. I didn’t want to be in a deposition or in court only have some lawyer wave around a screen-grab and thunder, “Isn’t it true that on July 4th you wrote…….” and quote something I couldn’t even remember writing. Once Jonathan invited me to be a front page writer, the rules changed. GBs have to sign their work. I post those stories under my meatworld name, but have kept the old username in the comments. My identity is one of the worst kept secrets in the blogosphere.
Tony Viera, I support the teachings and wisdom of many God myths. The Human race does need a structure of “goodness, equality, fairness” to use as as standard to survive and live in harmony with each other. Hate is the number 1 destroyer of harmony. Hate is also the number 1 tool of small minded people eager to divide and promote dissension between equal struggling humans, usually for self centered ego driven aggrandizement. You have the right to be right for you. Your philosophy is not right for me. Your accusations of “all the God haters here” is frivolous, ignorant and wrong. I do believe you know that.
Public funding of “religious” schools is wrong and should be stopped along with tax exemptions for churches and special exemptions for churches and “religious” institutions from the application of generally applicable laws. It is time to disentangle our government from religious groups who would crush the freedom of anyone who disagrees with them.
@Gene H., I agree with you that a blog poster can decide to hide his identity and that ought be politically and constitutionally protected conduct, but, damn, there’s a fly in that otherwise sweets smelling and sweet sounding ointment you speak.
You see, I’m a lawyer and I believe I have every right to call out someone that’s hiding as they speak – call it a corollary to the right to confront witnesses. I do understand you have conventions, and they sound respectable and intellectual especially spoken in French or Latin (whatever that high sounding stuff is), but, I think I’d rather follow after the principle that says that you really ought to have the courage to speak openly what you believe, and if not, you are suspect.
Now, where were we?
Dear Reader: Charter School Charade
By Rabbi Eric H. Yoffie
Reform Judaism
Summer 2010
http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=1589
Excerpt:
Some wonderful ideas are circulating these days about how to renew Jewish life, but creating publicly funded charter schools which teach Hebrew language and Jewish culture to children of all faiths is not one of them.
Philanthropic supporters of the three Hebrew charter schools that now exist in America (and the dozen more currently in the works) express two primary motivations, both of which are seriously flawed.
First, they say the high cost of attending Jewish day schools makes it difficult for most parents to choose that option; charters, on the other hand, can strengthen Jewish identity at no cost to parents.
The problem here is that Hebrew charter schools cannot promote Jewish identity and commitment without running afoul of church-state separation restrictions. As a result, Jewish education at these schools becomes an elaborate charade. When the staff of a school cannot openly proclaim its commitment to strengthening Jewish identity, involving parents in the process, the endeavor is doomed to failure.
Second, charter advocates make a virtue of offering Jewish cultural education that is stripped of religion, not only because it allows for public funding, but also because some Jews are more comfortable with Jewish culture than with Jewish religion.
But these two pillars of Jewish life are inextricably intertwined. Cultural Judaism invariably includes holiday observance, commitment to Jewish peoplehood, and even study of religious texts—all of which are severely circumscribed in a charter school setting. Any effort to isolate culture from religion distorts the very essence of Judaism.
Elaine, thank you for this. Your coverage, as always, is deep and rich. Religious fundamentalists are like a leaky faucet. The waste water will find a way to get into every crack, and there the rot begins.
For example, Tony Vieira seems to be upset no one is afraid of his god-bully any longer. Maybe Tony Vieira could stand on his own two feet and represent himself without resorting to grade-school calls for the divine smiting of those with whom he disagrees. I, for one, do not hate Tony’s deity, as hate is already bad idea, even more so when spent on that which does not exist. So no hate for you today, Tony Vieira, sorry. You’re going to have to grow up, I’m afraid. Or not. Free country it is.
Chris Christie supports a scheme to use taxpayer dollars to fund private school (including parochial school) scholarships for some students; he would accomplish this “money laundering” by giving a corporation a tax break that matches whatever amount the corporation provides in the way of a scholarship to a private school.
http://www.njsba.org/sb_notes/20100519/voucher.html
Needless to add, managers of religious schools love the idea — more income for them.
http://tinyurl.com/yhdkbc8 and http://tinyurl.com/kx5lgbr
Tony Vieira,
Anonymous posting is not only the policy of this blog, it is a legally protected aspect of political free speech. A poster in a forum such as this may have many reasons to use a “handle”, from job considerations to privacy to pure amusement. However, as a matter of fact, the poster you refer to posted for a long time here under his real name. Attacking his statements because he uses a nom de plume is a puerile and baseless attack that lacks substance.
Now where were you?
Should all students be taught the same thing, knowing that it is only one perspective and, in many cases erroneous? Much of what we were all taught in school was propaganda supporting the existing political system.
Maybe a better system would be to teach students from a very young age to use the Internet to teach themselves about those topics that interest them. Of course basic reading, writing, arithmetic, and science would still need to be publicly supported to ensure that every student had a basic education. Social studies and history, – any ideas that trigger hatred, exceptionalism, and division, should probably be left to private funding based on individual choice. Music, sports, and art should probably also be private endeavors with scholarships for those who cannot pay.
@Davidbluefish, posting an otherwise ballsy comment on a blog like this under an alias is a sign of a weak, fearful, and unself-reflecting mind. Now, where were we?
Elaine, your research and communication skills are top notch. Another bookmark for my computer files. Thank you.
@Tony Viera, God Haters?
The God myth is most often about Love thy neighbor, treat all people with the respect, due to them being a child of this mythical God.
I certainly can Love and Respect my neighbor, without the need for an authoritarian thunderbolt hurler in the sky.
Tony Viera, calling non religious people God haters, is a cheap carnival trick, designed by a weak fearful mind.
As a libertarian I believe here should be complete separation of education and state. School vouchers sound all and good but in reality it’s just a money shuffling game and public money is still used for them.
With a complete separation of education and state, the theocons/warvangelicals can have their schools free of evolution teachings, atheist, Muslim, other non-christian, libertarian and liberal students for example. Also the left can have their own schools and teach whatever they want to teach.
The real kicker is when you propose such an idea both the right and left hate it. Although you cant blame them as both want stolen money to finance their world view.
To some it may at first sound like no big thing for public money to fund religious schooling.
However, down through history it has proven to be a seed that grows into a monster.
Elaine M confirms and reminds us of the history we are ignoring.
On this I happen to agree with all you God haters. Public money ought not be used to fund any sort of religion – deism, christian theism, humanism/atheism, hinduism,buddhism, islamism, etc…. They all ought to pay their own freight or fade away. Its the marketplace of ideas in action.