Who’s To Blame For George Zimmerman’s Most Recent Violent Assault Charge? Why It’s You His Former Lawyer Says

By Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger

“Now if I stop there it sort of sounds like I’m asking you to let my guilty client go,” O’Mara told the jury. “I’m not. He’s not guilty of anything but protecting his own life. But the quote continues, ‘but for guilt and crimes that are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished, but if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemned, perhaps to die, then the citizens say whether I do good or whether I do evil is immaterial. If innocence itself is no protection, and if such an idea as that were to take hold in the mind of the citizens, then it would be the end of security whatsoever.’”
~Mark O’Mara’s closing argument to the jury in State of Florida v. George Zimmerman

Does George and Lawyer Don West Know Something We Don't?
Do George and Lawyer Don West Know Something We Don’t?

Innocence?  You remember George Zimmerman from the last news cycle, right?   He’s the wanna-be Batman, who shot and killed Trayvon Martin on a rainy night as the teenager came back from the all-night convenience store. George was that “mellow” and “peaceful” man who just happened to pack a gun for self-defense according to his then-lawyer, Mark O’Mara. Exonerated by a hand-picked jury, one of whom now regrets the acquittal saying he “got away with murder,” Zimmerman, we were told, would just ride off into the sunset with his loving and apparently loyal to the point of perjury wife, chastened by the experience of being wrongly accused of murder. George was a victim in all of this his family said, and threats to his life were comparable to the Aurora Theatre shooting or the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. He needs protection shouted his brother, Robert Zimmerman, Jr.,  in an email to St. Mary’s Police Chief Steve Bracknell: “Zimmerman is a Sandy Hook, Aurora waiting to happen.  Your job is to protect the communities you serve and you are failing big time.”

George is under assault, you see, and the perpetrators are all of us — or at least all of us who threw some skepticism George’s way. But as recent events have shown, George Zimmerman may not be as innocent in the ways of the world as his spin-meisters would have you believe.

In September, George allegedly stormed into his father-in law’s house and assaulted Shellie Zimmerman, the wife who stood by him throughout the trial but who now says she has “doubts about his innocence.” After smashing up a few things, Zimmerman then allegedly threatened the former love of his life and hit his senior citizen father-in-law in the nose all the while brandishing that ultimate validation of the Second Amendment, a handgun. That case is now dropped after a smashed Ipad failed to corroborate the testimony of two — count ’em — two witnesses.  Zimmerman is the Teflon Man, you see.

This month George did an encore — allegedly — on his new girlfriend, Samantha Scheibe, who claims that she too was threatened with a shotgun after Zimmerman smashed up her stuff as heard on a released 911 call. George did his own 911 call rebuttal shortly thereafter and then sat peacefully in the dwelling amid his now locked away shotguns as the police broke down the barricaded door to arrest him.  Guess the doorbell was on the fritz. Zimmerman, ever the object of everyone’s ill-affections, claims it was Scheibe who did the smashing and the threatening. News is now out that Scheibe contacted a reporter prior to the assault to discuss the details of her relationship with Zimmerman, which, of course, led to a chant of Zimmerman apologists that poor ol’ George is being set up and being victimized all over again. Oh, the humanity! George’s new love denies she set him up claiming she stayed with the man who scared her and has a “fascination for guns” because she wanted to help him. Oh, the humanity!

Whatever the truth, most all would agree that Zimmerman is a man on spiral and the direct isn’t towards the heavens. Por que?, you ask, of the man who was simply defending himself from politically driven charges in his epic TV battle? His former lawyer, who sort of represents him in a defamation suit against NBC, but who announced following the alleged assault on Zimmerman’s wife that he no longer represented him and then added he wanted to be paid for  $2.5 million or so in work he’d already done,  claims it’s all the haters out there who changed the sweet, innocent lamb of  “stand your ground” ( I know it wasn’t raised in  the trial but who would claim it wasn’t a big part of the case?) into the Scourge of St. Mary’s. It was all those misguided folks who concluded that shooting a 17-year-old kid armed only with a bag of Skittles and some Arizona Iced Tea was somehow, someway  wrong that caused the trauma that now plagues sweet ol’ George Zimmerman.

“He was turned into one of the most hated men in America for having to defend his life. So I’m not sure what happens with a 28-year-old when you do that to him and put him in hiding for 16 or 18 months. Maybe this is some of that fallout,” tutted the admitted killer’s mouth-piece.

Whew! I’m sure glad  now TV personality Mark O’Mara cleared that up. For a while there, I actually thought George Zimmerman was going to accept some responsibility for his alleged misdeeds. Perish the thought that some remorse is in order for the man whose estranged wife calls a “pacing lion,” and a”ticking time bomb.”

Nope, we’re all indicted in Zimmerman’s blind rage — allegedly — and it seems everyone around him and even beyond  is “in” on the conspiracy to get George. The only innocent in this mess, as Mr. O’Mara claimed then and now,  is George. Formerly a victim of politics and now one of society imposed trauma, Zimmerman ought to swear out his own arrest warrant on all of us who believe, as that  juror with the slow forming epiphany, that maybe George  really did “[get] away with murder.” Ol’ George has become a bastardized version of Janis Ian’s classic tale of woe and the new Society’s Child having been ruthlessly battered by all of us based on our unfounded prejudices.  Quite ironic given the history of the case.

If we’re lucky,  at our trial we can have Mark O’Mara sitting with us a counsel table and the Zimmerman jury as our judges. We’ll be exonerated from every sin — both now and in the future — no matter how despicably we act. Allegedly, of course.

Source: Click Orlando

~Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger

91 thoughts on “Who’s To Blame For George Zimmerman’s Most Recent Violent Assault Charge? Why It’s You His Former Lawyer Says”

  1. he should be charged with abusing the 911 emergency call system. it’s for emergencies, not making sure your version of the incident is on the record.

    not to mention resisting arrest without violence. though i’ve always though that’s a bs charge.

  2. LuckyLarry:

    “But your Pavlovian puppies, Jonathan, always respond the way you set your article.”

    **********************

    I wrote this article (not JT) and I am keenly aware of the statistics you cited. Where we differ is that I have no idea how to write an indictment of an entire people based on the actions of the lowest and the least. It would be like judging all Italians by John Gotti or all jews by the JDL. Perhaps you can enlighten me.

    1. YO Y’all,

      Whitey has his problems & NOBODY says he ain’t, but Blacks have MAJOR problems, that White Liberal Yuppies exacerbate.

      MLK loved White Pussy!

      Bill Cosby loved White Pussy, but like them unconscious.

      Tiger Woods loves White Pussy!

      Barry “Who he” Obama came by White Pussy!

      So what the F–k is your problem, Black man?

      YOU LOVE WHITEY!

      One would think that Jonathan Turley, with all his psychology, could help the Black man understand his psychosis?

      But Jonathan allows his White Liberal Yuppies FART all over his blog, spewing their crap!

      America is Multi-Ethnic and most of them HATE Ni–ers.

      They see them as PARASITES!

      Unwilling to get off their arse & do something for themselves!

      And we can see the same behavior in Africa TODAY!

      THEY HAVE NOT EVOLVED & WILL NEED A THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE THEY ARE READY TO ENTER SOCIETY.

      We MUST allow them The Right Of Return to Africa!

      They should NEVER have been taken from their Mother Land – The Jungle!

      OK?

      1. Luckylarry,

        Being Jewish it saddens me that you identify yourself as a Jewish veteran. Not only are you a loser and a disgusting human being, but you are living proof that some of us are complete schmucks and normally we try to keep that secret.

        1. kraken, You are wrong. I do not think davidm is anywhere close to the bigoted, foulness of lls. At least davidm does try and present rational arguments which many of us disagree with. I think that this LLS needs to be gone, since I see no point or profit in trying to deal with this kind of racist bigotry and illogic. The only way to deal with such as this kind of person is with hot lead, not lead pencils. The essence of fascism as this guy puts forward is irrational race baiting. Time to call a halt to him here.

        2. MS While I am not Jewish many of my friends and some of my relatives are, but I have never heard such crap as this from even the most rightwing Jewish Zionists. I could not even attribute this to the Zionists of any stripe, except Kahane maybe. I would not slander any Jew by attributing such to a Jew. I seriously doubt this guy is a vet or a Jew.

        3. YO MIKE,

          THE “HOLY BABYLONIAN JEWISH TALMUD”

          The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of 35 volumes). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition):

          “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”

          Jewish scholar Hyam Maccoby, in “Judaism on Trial,” quotes Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph:

          “Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible … God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own … anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture.”

          The Talmud (and not the Scriptures) is the legal/canonical text which obligates those who follow the Jewish religion. It is from the Talmud that laws, regulations, and world views are drawn. In practice, the everyday life of the modern religious person is drawn and influenced by the Talmud.

          Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed,

          “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1
          Yebamoth 60b

          Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah,” or binding Jewish law. 2 Yebamoth 60b

          Has Rabbi ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

          References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

          THE PHARISEES ENDORSED CHILD SEX

          The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.

          Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” 3

          In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia:
          “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” 4

          1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
          2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
          3 Sanhedrin 76a.
          4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

          1. Yo Larry,

            What does it feel like to be a loathsome pig of a human being? Someone whose nose should be in the filth and muck of a sty, though muck must smell good to you. The only truth you know is of fear and of hate and I’m glad I’m not living life through you eyes because therein lies madness. Take the meds the good Doctors have prescribed for you Larry, or soon they’ll have to lock you up to keep you from further harming and humiliating yourself

            1. Statement on Sexual Abuse of Children
              By Rabbi Zev. M. Shandalov
              May 22, 2006

              Over the past few days, there have been a number of items that have been printed in the mainstream press and in the “Jewish” press regarding stories of sexual abuse of children and alleged cover-up of said abuse and the perpetrators. The purpose of this email is to address this situation.
              WE MAY NOT REMAIN SILENT WHEN ANYONE IS BEING ABUSED AND CERTAINLY NOT WHEN THE PERSON BEING ABUSED IS A CHILD!
              Rabbi Zev M. Shandalov
              Congregation Kehilath Jacob Beth Samuel (KJBS)
              Chicago, IL
              Cases of Clergy Abuse and Other Trusted Officials
              1. Case of Rabbi Yoram Aberjil (Netivot, Israel) (Accused of cult like practices and sexual harassment of young women and treatening the lives of the survivors and those who support them.)
              2. Case of Rabbi Shlomo Aviner (Beit El, Israel) (Two women accused the rabbi of creating emotionally intimate relationships with them. These relationships included his expressions of his love for them during regular late-night phone conversations, extracting details from them of their sexuality and promoting an unhealthy emotional dependence on him).
              3. Case of Rabbi Aryeh Blaut (AKA: Louis Blaut, Louis Steven Blaut, Louis A. Blaut, Louis S. Blaut) (Seattle, WA) (Convicted sex offender on federal charges of possession of child pornography. According to the United States Department of Probation, Louis Blaut is not allowed contact with anyone under the age of eighteen on the internet or in person).
              4. Case of Rabbi Jerry Brauner (Boro Park, Brooklyn, NY) (Convicted on the charges of Sexual Abuse-1st Degree and Sexual Abuse-3rd:Subject Another Person to Sex Contact Without Consent. He was sentenced to 11 years probation, with the condition he must participate in a sex offender treatment program. Brauner has been on probation since 2002 for the sexual abuse of a 15-year-old boy. On December 27, 2006, Jerry Brauner was arrested on charges of stealing a half-million-dollar home from a cancer-stricken woman, using a forged power of attorney to sell it and pocket the profits. Brauner is being held in lieu of $85,000 bail for lying about prior sex-abuse convictions when he applied for his notary’s license.)
              5. Case of Rabbi Lewis Brenner (AKA: Lippa Brenner) (Brooklyn, NY) (Convicted of child molestation. The original charges included 14 counts of sodomy, sexual abuse and endangering the welfare of a child. He agreed to plead guilty to one count of sodomy in the third degree, a Class E felony, in exchange for a sentence of five years’ probation.)
              6. Case of Rabbi Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel (Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of child molestation)
              7. Case of Rabbi Ephraim Bryks (Winnipeg, Canada, New York, NY) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accusations about sexual inappropriate behavior with children started surfacing in the 1980’s. Rabbi Bryks is currently a member of the Vaad Harabonim of Queens. The Vaad is a Rabbinical committee that makes important decisions within an orthodox community.)
              8. Case of Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accused of several cases of child molestation, and sexual assault of young adult women)
              9. Case Rabbi Perry Ian Cohen – Montreal and Toronto Canada (Accused of sexual abuse of a seventeen year old. Fired for sexual impropriety with congregants)
              10. Case of Rabbi Yitzchak Cohen (Israel) (Accused of sexually harassing students at Bar-Ilan University)
              11. Case of Rabbi Asher Dahan, Be’er Sheva, Israel (Arrested after being accused of raping and sexually abusing two 17-year-old girls after he offered “to redeem them of sin and evil inclinations.”)
              12. Case of Rabbi Anthony Dee (Blackpool England; Portsmouth, England) (Former synagogue minister Reverend Anthony Dee found guilty of sexually abusing two boys and a girl in Blackpool and Portsmouth, England. This is the first set of convictions, there was a second set of convictions in 1997.)
              13. Case of Rabbi Moshe Eisemann (AKA: Moshe Eiseman) – Mashgiach Ruchni Ner Israel Rabbinical College (Baltimore, MD) (There is a Call for Action on this case – Accused of child sexual abuse)
              14. Case of Rabbi Elior Chen (Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of cultic type practices)
              15. Case of Rabbi Arnold Fink – Beth El Hebrew Congregation – Alexandria, VA (Accused of Professional Rabbinic Sexual Misconduct)
              16. Case of Rabbi Benyamin Yaakov Fleischman (AKA Benyamin Fleischman, Ben Fleischman)- Photographer (Baltimore, MD) (Convicted of sexually assaulting a minor.)
              17. Case of Rabbi Gershon Freidlin (Colonia, NJ; Pittsburgh, PA; Washington, PA) (Rabbi Gershon Freidlin pleaded guilty to one count of child endangerment , saying he had touched the youth’s penis and buttocks while applying tanning lotion on the boy on July 10, 1995 Under the terms of a plea agreement, the rabbi will not be jailed for the crime, but faces up to five years probation.)
              18. Case of Yehudah Friedlander – Rabbi ‘s Assistant (Brooklyn, NY) (Accused of molesting a 15 year old on a 1995 plane flight from Australia to LA. Friedlander was the assistant to the chief rabbi of an Hungarian Hasidic congregation in Brooklyn, known as the Pupas)
              19. Case of Cantor Stuart Friedman (Halifax,Canada-Philadelphia, Detroit, Boston, Los Angeles, Baltimore) (Convicted and sentanced to 15 months in federal prison on one count of distributing child pornography).
              20. Case of Cantor Philip Friedman (Albany, NY, Queens, NY, Long Island, NY) (Temple Israel fired its longtime cantor for “inappropriate behavior” toward a member of the congregation, and the Albany County district attorney’s office confirmed Tuesday that it is investigating the matter.)
              21. Case of Rabbi Jacob Frank (AKA: Yaakov Frank) and the Frankist Movement (Convicted of cultic type practices and sexual offenses.)
              22. Case of Rabbi Lewis Furman of Ohr Somayach, Johannesburg, South Africa (Prominent South African rabbi who was allegedly caught having an affair with a married woman. He is also accused of being “serial philanderer” — was forced to resign his position in South Africa and will not practise as a rabbi in this country again.)
              23. Rabbi Tobias Gabriel (Toronto, Canada) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accused by more then one woman of clergy sexual abuse / professional sexual misconduct).
              24. Case of Rabbi Mordechai Gafni (aka: Marc Gafni, Mordechai Winiarz, Marc Winiarz) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accused sexually abusing teenage girls, attempted sexual assault of a young adult, and also accused of cult like practices).
              25. Case of Rabbi Shimon Gerlick (Nahariya, Israel) (Arrest for allegedly committing indecent sexual acts with a two minors and and adult woman)
              26. Case of Rabbi Jonathan Ginsburg (St. Paul, MN) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Resigned as senior rabbi at Temple of Aaron, shortly after reaching an out-of-court settlement with a former congregation member who accused him of sexual misconduct. A criminal investigation into the case also is being closed, with no charges forthcoming).
              27. Case of Rabbi Ephraim Goldberg (Boca Raton, FL) (Pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of exposure of sexual organs in a washroom at a Palm Beach Mall.)
              28. Case of Rabbi/Cantor Sidney Goldenberg (Levittown,NY; Seaford, NY; Bayshore, NY; Petaluma, CA; Coney Island, NY) (Convicted of molesting children. The first complaints came in 1971. He was finally convicted in 1997.)
              29. Case of Cantor Joel Gordon (Buffalo Grove, IL) (Convicted of having keeping a house of prostitution and involvement in a prostitution ring.)
              30. Case of Rabbi Mark A. Golub – Mental Health Counselor (Newport, Virginia) (Had professional counseling license revolked for having sex with a female client, according to a state disciplinary order).
              31. Case of Rabbi Sidney Greenbaum (AKA: Rabbi Zalman Greenbaum, Professor Zalman Greenbaum) (Pleaded guilty at Hendon magistrates’ court to three charges of indecent assault on young boys)
              32. Case of Rabbi Yisrael Menachem Grunwald (AKA: Israel Grunwald) (Borough Park/Brooklyn NY) (In a plea bargin agreement Rabbi Israel Grunwald agreed to 500 hours of community service and counseling after being accused of fondling a 15-year-old on a 1995 plane flight from Australia. The charges against him were then dropped.)
              33. Case of Rabbi Solomon Hafner (Borough Park/Brooklyn, NY) (Accused of sexually abusing a developmentally disabled boy)
              34. Case of Cantor Mark Horowitz, Temple Beth Am in Amherst (Getzville, NY) (Charged with committing lewd acts on an undercover police officer.)
              35. Case of Rabbi (Alan J.) Shneur Horowitz (Hagerstown, MD; Israel; Schenectady, NY; California; Iowa) (Convicted and sentenced to 10 – 20 years in prison for sodomizing a nine-year-old psychiatric patient. Allegedly, he has assaulted a string of children from California to Israel to New York in the past twenty years. Alan J. Horowitz is an Orthodox rabbi, magna cum laude, M.D., Ph.D. A graduate of Duke University, and was a writer for NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association).
              36. Case of Rabbi Steven J. Kaplan (Saskatoon, Canada) (Allegations, detailed in court documents, that he lacked proper ordination, sexually harassed female congregants and committed adultery with one of them).
              37. Case of Rabbi David Kaye (Potomac, MD; Rockville, MD; San Antonio, TX) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Featured on “Dateline NBC” for seeking a sexual encounter with an underage boy in a chat room. NBC News conducted a sting in August, (2005) working with a group called “Perverted Justice.” Members of the group, posing as underage boys and girls, entered Internet chat rooms and waited for adults to engage them in conversations)
              38. Case of Rabbi David Kedmi – Certified Mohel (New Hempstead, NY; Spring Valley, NY) (Accused of Battery and Breach of Contract.)
              39. Case of Case of Rabbanit Bruria Keren (AKA: Burka Wearing Mother) (Beit Shemish, Israel) (Arrested on charges of child sexual abuse and physical abuse of her twelve children. She has also been accused of cult like practices)
              40. Case of Rabbi Israel Kestenbaum (New York, NY) (Convicted of child pornography on the internet)
              41. Case of Rabbi Robert Kirschner (San Francisco, CA) (Confessed to sexually exploited or harassing three congregants and a synagogue employee)
              42. Case of Rabbi Yisucher Kohn (AKA: Barry Kohn) (New Square, NY) (Convicted of Sexual Abuse 1st: Sexual Contact With Individual Less Than 11Years Old.)
              43. Case of Rabbi Yehuda Kolko (AKA: Joel Kolko, Yudi Kolko) – Yeshiva Torah Temimah (New York, NY) (Arrested in New York City on December 7, 2006 following a long-term police investigation. He was charged with four counts of sexual abuse, including two felony counts, and endangering the welfare of a child. The most recent sexual abuse was allegedly against an 8-year-old boy, who says he was abused while he was in the first grade during the 2002-03 school year.Rabbi Yudi Kolko and Yeshiva Torah Temimah were hit with a $20 million civil lawsuit on May 5, 2006, accusing him of molesting two students more than 25 years ago. One of the alleged victims said Rabbi Yehuda Kolko, 60, sexually assaulted him when he was a seventh-grade student).
              44. Case of Rabbi Ze’ev Kopolevitch (Jerusalem, Israel) (Convicted of molesting students at Rosh Yeshiva, Netiv Meir yeshiva high school)
              45. Case of Rabbi Mahluf Aminadav Krispin – Chief Rabbi of Kiryat Bialik (suspected and chared with the sexual assault of two women)
              46. Case of Rabbi Baruch Lanner (New York, NY) (Convicted – child molestation. Sentancing still pending after 2 years)
              47. Case of Rabbi Avraham M. Leizerowitz (AKA: Avraham Mordecai Lazerewitz) – Geres Misivta Bais Yisroel School, (Borough Park Brooklyn) – (A civil suit was filed against Rabbi Avraham Mordecai Leiverowitz of the Gerrer Mesivta High School in Borough Park Brooklyn. The charges include improperly touching a boy during a one-on-one help session in the rabbi’s office in the Borough Park secondary school. Three other older boys have also come forward making similar allegations.)
              48. Case of Cantor Steven Joel Levin (AKA: Steven Levin, Steve Levin, Steven J. Levin) (Allegations were made against Cantor Steven Joel Levin of child molestation. There was also a seperate allegation of professional sexual misconduct by another party.)’
              49. Case of Rabbi Stanley Z. Levitt (Philadelphia, PA; Baltimore, MD) (Several adults who have accused Rabbi Stanley Levitt of child molestation over the last forty years.)
              50. Case of Rabbi Jerrold Martin Levy (Boca Raton, FL) (Convicted of two counts of soliciting sex through the Internet and two counts of child pornography. He was sentenced to six years and sex in prison. He was caught in the “Candyman” year-long sting operation by the US government.)
              51. Case of Rabbi Pinchas Lew (Pottville, IA and Chapel Hill, NC) (Accused of exposing himself and touching his genitals repeatedly in front of an unrelated woman in his home)
              52. Case of Rabbi David E. Lipman – Kiruv Rabbi (Prescott, AZ; Cranston, R.I.) (Pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a minor, a Class 2 felony, and three counts of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor, Class 3 felonies. Lipman pleaded guilty to pertain to the computer images of children younger than the age of 15. ).
              53. Case of Rabbi/Psychologist Mordecai Magencey (St. Louis, MO) (Lost his license to practice in the State of Missouri because of his sexual misconduct with his patients.)
              54. Case of Rabbi Richard Marcovitz (Oklahoma City, OK) (Convicted of indecent or lewd acts with a child, and sexual battery)
              55. Rabbi Jacob A. Max (Baltimore, MD) (Convicted on charges of a sex offense in the fourth degree and second degree)
              56. Case of Rabbi Samuel Mendelowitz – Licensed Marriage Counselor (Teaneck, NJ) (Accused of gross malpractice with four female patients between 1981 and 1992. He allegedly pressured women to remove their blouses and touched them sexually, engaged in masturbation and oral sex with one patient, and disparaged their husbands and urged them to have extramarital sex with what he called “surrogate lovers” male patients in his group sessions.)
              57. Case of Rabbi Yaakov Menken (Baltimore, MD) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Serious allegations have been made against Rabbi Yaakov Menken which include sexual harassment, sexual misconduct and sexual assault. Menken’s alleged modus operandi (M.O.) is of becoming a father figure to vulnerable young women and eventually allegedly sexually assaulting them.)
              58. Case of Rabbi Yona Metzger (Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of sexually misconduct with four men)
              59. Case of Rabbi Juda Mintz – AKA: Yehuda Mintz (Montreal, Canada; Williamsburg, NY; Atlanta, GA; Mt. Freedom, NJ; Los Angeles, CA; Venice, CA) (Convicted – internet sting on child pornography)
              60. Case of Rabbi Avrohom Mondrowitz, M.Sc., Ph.D., L.N.H.A. (Chicago, IL; Brooklyn, NY; Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of two counts of sex abuse with boys at a special education school in New York. He is currently a college professor in Jerusalem, Israel).
              61. Case of Rabbi Shalom Nagar – AKA Shlomo Nagar (Ariel, Israel) (Arrested for allegedly raping a woman who had turned to him for advice. Nagar, married with children, has served for many years as the chief rabbi of this mainly secular town, the largest Jewish settlement in Samaria)
              62. Case of Cantor Howard Nevison (New York, NY) (Nevison pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of indecent assault, terroristic threats, simple assault, corruption of minors and endangering the welfare of children. Two felony counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse will be dismissed when Nevison is sentenced. A sentencing hearing has not been scheduled.)
              63. Case of Rabbi Gabriel Ohayon (Boca Raton, FL) (Alleged rabbinical sexual misconduct. A former employee sued a Boca Raton Judaic studies institute, alleging that Rabbi Gabriel Ohayon groped and sexually harassed her).
              64. Case of Rabbi Yehuda Aryeh Oratz (AKA: Yehoda A. Oratz) (LAKEWOOD, NJ; Marietta, GA; Brooklyn, NY) (Convicted of stalking children under the age of thirteen, and then sexually assaulting them. The Victims did NOT know the offender.Please note that there is more then one Rabbi Yehuda Oratz. This convicted offender was born on April 11, 1967).
              65. Case of Rabbi Michael Ozair (Beverly Hills, CA) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Convicted, pleaded no contest to oral copulation with a 14-year-old minor. )
              66. Case of Cantor Alain Oziel (New York, NY; Toronto, Canada) (Convicted on one count of indecent assault, gross indecency and attempted buggery during the period January 1, 1981, to December 31, 1982, of a teenage boy. He was sentenced to five years’ in prison. Oziel’s sentence was reduced due to his deteriorating health).
              67. Case of Rabbi Haim Pardes – Former President of the Tel Aviv Rabbinical Court (Israel) (Convicted of sexually blackmailing” and performing “licentious acts” with women who sought his counsel in a synagogue. Pardes was sentanced to six months in prison and given an 18-month suspended prison sentence and fined 25,000 shekels ($12,500).
              68. Case of Lou Pearlman – Mentor to the Stars (Queens, NY, Hollywood, CA) (Alleged child molester)
              69. Case of Rabbi Avrohom Reichman (Williamsburg, Brooklyn, NY) (Accused of child molestation)
              70. Case of Shimon Rosen (Monsey, NY) (Convicted sex offender)
              71. Case of Cantor Stanley Rosenfeld (Warwick, RI) (Convicted of molesting a 12-year-old boy he was tutoring.)
              72. Case of Rabbi Edward Schlaeger (Shelton, CT; West Haven, CT) ( Arrested on a warrant Saturday and charged with one count of third-degree possession of child pornography.)
              73. Case of Rabbi Arthur Charles Shalman (AKA Charles Friedman, Charlie Frideman, Arthur Friedman, Arthur Shalman) (Buffalo, NY) (The Rabbinical Assembly concluded that Rabbi Shalman violated several principles of rabbinic conduct. Accused of sexual misconduct toward female congregational members. )
              74. Case of Rabbi Ephraim Shapiro (Baltimore, MD) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accused of molesting several boys.)
              75. Case of Cantor Robert Shapiro (Detroit, MI) (Pleaded guilty to 14 counts of indecent assault and battery on a mentally retarded person. In return, Norfolk County prosecutors dropped seven counts of rape.)
              76. Case of Yisroel Shapiro (Baltimore, MD) (Accused of molesting children)
              77. Case of Cantor Michael Segelstein (Las Vegas, NV) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Originally arraigned on one count each of attempted sexual assault, battery with intent to commit sexual assault and open and gross lewdness. On December 19, 2002, Michael Segelstein pled guilty to the lessor charges of open or gross lewdness, in which he received one year suspended sentence with conditions and court ordered into counseling. According to court documents, Segelstein’s probation was successfully completed. He has since been discharged. A civil suit is currently pending.)
              78. Rabbi Ben Zion Sobel (New York, NY; Jerusalem, Israel) (“Rabbi Ben Zion Sobel is one of the most notorious pedophiles he has known, leaving hundreds of boys he has victimized. At one point Rabbi Shach made a rabbinic decree stating that Rabbi Ben Zion Sobel could NEVER teach again.” “Ben Zion has left survivors in both the United States and Israel.” “His modus operandi was extremely violent and barbaric.” )
              79. Case of Rabbi Jack Sparks (Talleyville, DE; Newark, DE) (Arrested on charges of child endangerment of a fourteen-year-old boy.)
              80. Case of Rabbi David Alan Stein (AKA: David Stein, David A. Stein) – Dean of Jewish Life, American Hebrew Academy’s former director of campus (Greensboro, NC) (charged with eight counts of having sex with a student. The alleged sex acts occurred on campus during the 2006-07 school year. The student was a 16-year-old male.)
              81. Case of Robert Sternberg (AKA: Yerachiel Sherberg, Robert Stein) (Monsey, NY) (Convicted sex offender)
              82. Case of Rabbi Ze’ev Sultanovitch (Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of sexually molesting a number of adult yeshiva students at the Merkaz Harav Yeshiva)
              83. Case of Rabbi Melvin Teitelbaum (Los Angeles, CA) (Charges dismissed at the request of the District Attorney’s Office, which conceded it had insufficient evidence to prosecute.Teitelbaum then a filed a $10-million damage suit in Los Angeles Superior Court. In his suit that the Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles, the Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles and the family that accused him conspired to have him arrested and charged.Later, confronted with evidence that placed Teitelbaum elsewhere at the time of the alleged incident, the siblings changed their story, a move the prosecutor said was “devastating” to their credibility.)
              84. Case of Rabbi Aron Boruch Tendler (Los Angeles, CA; North Hollywood, CA) (Accused of sexually abusing teenage girls. Please Note: There is more then one Rabbi Aron Tendler. This page is about Rabbi Aron Boruch Tendler, who was born on January 15, 1955.)
              85. Case of Rabbi Mordecai Tendler (AKA: Mordechai Tendler) (Monsey, NY) (Accused of innappropriate sexual behavior with women in he counseled that had gone on for years. According to Rabbi Benzion Y. Wosner, head of the Shevet Levi rabbinical court in Monsey, One should never allow their wives or daughters to go to Rabbi Mordecai Tendler at all including [for] counseling… and all his rulings are null and void.” He also stated: “The RCA had every right to oust this rabbi from their organization, and his own congregation has the same obligation.” In conclusion, he wrote, “the rabbi can no longer officiate at divorces, weddings, etc.)
              86. Case of Rabbi Isadore Trachtman (Chicago, IL and Jerusalem, Israel) (Accused of cultic type practices and sexual offenses)
              87. Case of Rabbi Hirsch Travis (Monsey, NY) (Charged with the sexual abuse of an unidentified 27-year-old female patient. He was also charged with posing as a Brooklyn doctor specializing in infertility problems, and illegally operating the Fertility Foundation in the Borough Park section of Brooklyn.)
              88. Case of Rabbi Eliyahu Tzabari – Former chief rabbi of Ganei Tikva, Israel (Charged with sexually abusing a women with whom he counseled).
              89. Case of Rabbi Ivan Wachmann – Manchester, England (Accused of sexual misconduct with women from his Manchester synagogue)
              90. Case of the Rabbi Tzvi Wainhaus (AKA: The Rabbi at Hillel Torah (Chicago, IL) (arrested on October 26, 1999 and chargedwith sexual exploitation of a child. The report states that while he was tutoring an 11-year-old child, Wainhaus removed all of his clothing and exposed himself to the minor while stating that the minor “was a very sexy child”)
              91. Case of Rabbi Matis Weinberg (Baltimore, MD, Santa Clara, CA and Har Nof, Israel) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Accused of cultic type practices and sexual offenses)
              92. Case of Rabbi Yaakov Weiner (New York, NY and Israel) (Accused of molesting boy at Camp Mogen Avraham, New York)
              93. Case of Rabbi Israel Weingarten (Monsey, NY; England; Israel; Belgium) (
              94. Case of Rabbi Nachman Weisfeld (Northern, Israel) (Convicted of physically and sexually abusing children under his care in an education institution)
              95. Case of Rabbi Yaakov Weiss (Loudonville, NY) (Accused and arrested on charges of having a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old boy).
              96. Case of Rabbi Don Well – Principal (Brooklyn, NY) (Accused and charged with Rabbi one count of third-degree sexual abuse).
              97. Case of Cantor Phillip Wittlin (Harrisburg, PA) (Convicted of molesting two girls)
              98. Case of Rabbi Hershel J. Worch (Manchester, England, Mbale, Uganda; Melbourne, Australia; Pawtucket, RI; Chicago, IL; Istanbul, Turkey) (There is a Call for Action on this case. Formerly known as the Case of the Unnamed Rabbi in West Rogers Park). Accused of cult like practice which include BDSM (Bondage, Domination, Sadism, Masochism). The alleged offender originially mmets his victims on line. Allegations include using a mixture of kabbalah, hypno-eroticism and other manipulative techniques to enagage his potential victims prior to sexually assaulting them.
              99. Case of Rabbi Mordechai Yomtov (Los Angeles, CA) (WARNING: Rabbi Mordechai Yomtov, is in violation of sex offender registration requirements in California for past 2 years. If you know his whereabout please notify the California authorities at: (916) 227-4974. Convicted of sexual abuse and committing lewd acts against three boys)
              100. Case of Sabbatai Zevi (Accused of cultic type practices and sexual offenses.)
              101. Case of Rabbi Sheldon Zimmerman (New York, NY) (Suspended from the Reform movement’s rabbinic organization because of sexual impropriety was later hired to a top position by a program that sends thousands of young Jews on free trips to Israel.. Sheldon Zimmerman was based in Cincinnati, OH, yet, also had responsibility for the Hebrew Union College’s campuses in New York, NY; Los Angeles, CA and Jerusalem, Israel .)
              102. Case of the Rabbi Max Zucker (Dallas, TX) (Accused by three women of improperly touching)
              103. Case of a List of Abuses at Ner Israel (Toronto, Canada) (High school student, said he was assaulted by two college students)
              104. Case of The Zwi Migdal Society (Brazil, South Africa, India, China and Poland) (According to reports there were rabbis who were members of the society. From the 1860s to the beginning of the Second World War, thousands of naive, impoverished Jewish girls from eastern Europe were sold by Jewish mobsters into sexual slavery. This hugely profitable (annual revenues of $50 million in the 1890s) commerce in flesh was operated by the Zwi Migdal, a criminal association)
              105. Case of The Unnamed Kidnapping Chazen /Cantor (Toronto, Canada) (Accused of kidnapping young boys from Europe and bringing them to Toronto, Canada)
              106. Case of the Unnamed New York Rabbi Who Has An Unhealthy Interest In Teenage Boys
              107. Case of the Unnamed Rabbi – Principal Who Inpregnated A Girl With Learning Disabilities (There is a Call for Action on this case. The Awareness Center is looking for all the information we can find regarding the Rabbi-Prinicipal who inpregnated a girl with learning disabilities at school he was principal at.)
              108. Case of The Unnamed Orthodox Rabbi (Quebec, Canada) (An undercover reporter posed as an employee of an escort service. One of her two clients included a Hasidic rabbi, who masturbated in a motel room while looking at pornography on television and at the reporter in her underwear.)
              109. Case of 40-year-old man residing in an ultra-orthodox yeshiva (Several yeshiva students have testified in the case and verified suspicions that a 40-year-old man who resides in the yeshiva sexually assaulted them).

  3. now its hilarious to me. that people are still calling the trayvon the criminal while IGNORING THE FACTS THAT ZIMMERMAN himself has a lengthy criminal record.

    Zimmerman, in contrast, had actually been arrested on police allegations of thuggish behavior: for felony assault on a police officer and violent resisting of arrest.

    Additionally, Zimmerman’s former girlfriend also filed statements with a Florida court that alleged that he had refused to leave her home, taken her phone, and assaulted her, that he had previously hit her in her face, and that another time he had thrown her down on the bed despite her repeated objections.

    Zimmerman ended up pleading down the charges stemming from the fight with a police officer, and he was required to take an anger management class and do community service to get the case dismissed.

    On the domestic violence front, Zimmerman filed a claim after a domestic violence protection order was issued against him that claimed his ex instigated their fights, and ultimately the court ordered them both to stay away from each other.

    On July 16, 2005, Zimmerman was arrested for felony resisting arrest “with violence” and with “battery” of a law enforcement officer, according to the sworn affidavit filed in the case.

    The officer, Paul Fleischman, in the summary of his complaint said that Zimmerman interfered with an arrest of an Orlando bar employee who had been handcuffed and sitting on a curb awaiting transport to county jail. The Division of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms officer said Zimmerman was “obstructing justice.”
    Zimmerman’s Response to a Police Request to Walk Away: “Fuck You”

    When the undercover officer showed Zimmerman his badge and asked him to step away, Zimmerman reportedly said, “I don’t care who you are.” When the officer asked him again to leave, Zimmerman reportedly said, “F*ck you.”

    The officer stated that when he “attempted to escort Zimmerman away from the interview area, he shrugged away from me, and then pushed my arms away with his hands. After a short struggle with Zimmerman he was placed in handcuffs and detained” for transportation to jail.

    The officer said several law enforcement officers witnessed the fight, and that Zimmerman “refused medical treatment.” (Zimmerman was also identified as a white male in the affidavit.) His bond was set at $1,000.

    Zimmerman was initially charged with a felony in county court and in the process of plea negotiations the case was transferred to a lower court and he was then charged with misdemeanor resisting arrest and pleaded not guilty. Later that year he was accepted into a “pre-trial diversion” program that would allow the charges to be dismissed or not prosecuted (“nolle prosequi”).

    Zimmerman Given “Special Condition” — “Anger Management” Classes

    The court imposed a “special condition” on Zimmerman: that he complete an “Anger Management” class and write an apology to the officer. (Later, however, when Zimmerman applied to a criminal justice program, he claimed the police officer supposedly never said he was a police officer and that Zimmerman was trying to protect his friend from the officer who had arrested the friend.)

    The program also required Zimmerman not to violate any other laws and to be under court supervision for six months for $300 in fees, but he sought an extension to complete its 40 hours of required community service, along with a potential fee of $100 for the extension.
    While out on Bond for Assault, More Violence by Zimmerman Alleged

    In the meantime, on August 8, 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, petitioned for an order of “protection against domestic violence” by him. At the time, Zuazo was living in Orlando and Zimmerman was living in an apartment in Lake Mary, Florida, after they had stopped living together and broken up.
    Zimmerman Hung Out Near Ex’s House and Reportedly Insisted on Staying There

    According to Zuazo’s petition, on her way home that night around 10:30 pm, she spotted Zimmerman’s car near her home and called him on the phone to ask why he was there. According to Zuazo, Zimmerman replied that he was “checking on me.”

    She said he asked if he could come in and talk. She said she agreed they could talk for a “little bit,” and he stayed for an hour. When she told Zimmerman he had to go home, she said he “insisted on staying.”
    Zimmerman “Got Upset” When Asked to Leave, said Ex, and “Pushed” Her

    When she told him he could not stay, Zuazo said Zimmerman “got upset” and demanded some photos and papers.

    When she said she would find them tomorrow and drop them off, Zuazo said Zimmerman “got more upset.” She said he also grabbed her cell phone and tried to leave with it. She said she stood in front of the door and asked for it back.

    She said Zimmerman then told her the phone was not hers and then “pushed” her.

    She said she told him “not to touch me” and to give it back, and she said it then “became a pushing match.” She said she got the cell phone from him and they continued pushing each other as she tried to push him out of the door of her home.

    In the midst of this fight, she said her dog jumped up and marred his cheek by biting at it. She said the dog’s response to his fighting with her “freaked me out” and she reiterated her demand that he leave.

    She said she then ran up the stairs, and locked the door and called 9-1-1 on her phone. She said that as he walked out the door he yelled, “I can’t believe you’d do this to me.”

    When the police came, she says they recommended she file for an injunction to protect herself from him the next day.

    She did; on August 9, 2005, Zuazo requested a temporary restraining order.
    Ex Alleged Other Acts of Violence by Zimmerman

    In her request for an order of protection against Zimmerman, his ex detailed other times she says Zimmerman acted violently and that she had reported them to the Orlando Police Department.

    She said there was a previous violent incident when he was upset because she got home late and then he started “sexually groping me.” When she objected she said he said he could treat her that way because “I was his woman.” She said when she “asked him to leave me alone,” he picked her up and threw her on the bed. She said when she got up to leave “he grabbed” her and threw her down again. She admitted she smacked him in response and then he left.

    She said that another time he had “smacked my mouth” with an open hand during an argument in the car on their way back from a counseling session. She said she decided to stay at a friend’s house that night.
    Court Issued Domestic Violence Injunction against Zimmerman

    On August 9 of that year, a court granted her restraining order against Zimmerman. That injunction barred him from contacting her or hurting her and from possessing a firearm while the order was in effect.
    Zimmerman Responded to Domestic Violence Injunction by Claiming Ex Attacked

    The next day, on August 10, Zimmerman filed a petition asking the court to protect him from his ex-girlfriend, Zuazo. In that petition, he acknowledged that she had already sought a restraining order against him. That is, he did not call 9-1-1 as she did immediately following the violent fight and he did not report any claim of violence the following day, as she did. He pursued an order only after a court ordered him to stay away from her. In his petition, he lists the name of his criminal defense attorney in the case involving the violent incident with a law enforcement officer as his counsel.
    Zimmerman Claimed He Was just in Ex-Girlfriend’s Neighborhood, not Watching

    In his petition, Zimmerman claimed that on August 8 he was dropping a friend off when Zuazo called to ask what he was doing on her “side” of town. He says she asked him if he “wanted to spend the night.”

    In his statement, he says he “proceeded to her house” and watched TV. He said he told her he “was not interested in spending the night” because he had an interview the next morning. He claims his ex accused him of wanting to leave to see another woman or go party.
    Zimmerman Blamed Ex-Girlfriend for Starting Fight

    According to Zimmerman, “we started arguing and she started to get upset and violent.”

    He said he told her he “wanted nothing more to do with her” and asked for any belongings that remained at her house. He said she refused and said she would give them to him in the morning, the only point of agreement in their two versions of events.

    Zimmerman claims he then said he would not stay the night and would be leaving with what he called his cell phone that she had been using. He said he had allowed her to use it “as insurance” “to receive valuable paperwork that she had in her possession,” like loan documents.

    He said when he headed to the door to leave Zuazo slapped him and said he was not leaving. He said he told her she was losing control and that she responded by saying, “Fine, f-ing leave then.”

    However, then he claims she “physically assaulted me about the face and upper chest, at one point trying to choke” him. He said he then gave her the phone.

    He said she then threatened to call the police and “put me away forever” based on the pending charge of assaulting a law enforcement officer. He then claimed that he went to a friend’s house and “cleaned up the blood, patched my eye, and iced my bruises.” He did not seek medical treatment.

    When Zimmerman filed his counter-claim against her restraining order, he included a photo of scratches on his cheek he claimed she caused; she had claimed her dog had jumped on him and caused that. The abrasions on his cheek in the photo could have been caused by a dog’s teeth or paws or by nails or by a woman’s fingernails.
    Zimmerman Claimed Ex Was Aggressor and Attacked Him Previously

    In his petition, Zimmerman also claimed that previously Zuazo had been upset that he had gone to a concert without her and then hit him in the face and with a baseball bat. He claimed that when he locked her out of the house during that argument, she beat on the door and then vandalized his car with a pair of scissors. There is no indication that he sought medical treatment for the alleged bat attack or called the police that night claiming she was a vandal.
    Court Issued Injunction Barring Zimmerman and Ex from Contact

    On August 24, a Florida court issued two final judgments on the petitions that enjoined Zimmerman and his ex from contact with each other for a year and barred them both from possessing firearms during the year the injunction was in force.
    Criminal Case against Zimmerman Later Dismissed

    The domestic violence case appears to have had no effect on Zimmerman’s case for battering a law enforcement officer. He ultimately completed the requirements of the criminal diversion program, and in the summer of 2006 the state of Florida dismissed the case under the “nolle prosequi” provision of the program.

    These records about violent acts Zimmerman is alleged to have committed took place a few years ago and there appear to have been no other charges against him until he killed Trayvon Martin last year.

  4. Blouise, Excellent summary.

    The good news is that GZ is currently forbidden to have guns and the ones that he had are in evidence. If he is found guilty, he loses his right to own a gun.

  5. hahahahahaha i love this blog. in all its glory. and i most definitely love the posters who are will choose death rather then admit and accept the truth of situations. and reality.. so like all the rest with their opinions heres mines..

    let’s start with o.j.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/serial-killer-oj-simpson-murdered-nicole-brown-simpson/story?id=17765728

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2235075/O-J-Simpson-case-Explosive-new-documentary-claims-serial-killer-Glen-Rogers-blame-double-murder-Nicole-Brown-Simpson-friend-1994.html

    now because im not sure of how many links are allowed in the posts here. i’ll post the rest of my comment in another box….

    now i saw the documentary this mans brother turned him in.. this man gave his mother a pin he stole from nicole and his mother wore that pin to court everyday of the trial….and this man confessed to the murder and gave details of the crime that was never put in the media nor allowed to be introduced in court…… moving on to my next comment concerning zimmerman….

  6. Perfect information. *snort*giggle*

    Someone’s never heard of Kurt Gödel.

    There is best evidence and there is everything else.

  7. And of course, not guilty does not mean innocent, just not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Zimmerman’s continuing erratic and apparently violent behavior seems to point in the direction of not innocent but not guilty enough to be sufficient for that jury.

  8. mespo7272,

    Less than convincing to whom? Obviously, the trial judge must have been convinced that the reasons given for the strike were race neutral.

    If the defense impermissibly exercised a strike for racial or gender reasons, the government could, under Batson, challenge that strike. The fact that Florida has eliminated the prima facie requirement of Batson (the case is not limited to the defendant, it refers to “the opponent of the strike”) should have made it more, not less, likely that the government would succeed in a Batson challenge as they would not be required to make the prima facie case.

  9. Charles:

    “And, unless you were on that jury and considered all the evidence and law presented to you, you are simply not qualified to comment. You can like or not like the Zimmerman trial outcome, but your opinion is not relevant if you were not there.”

    *****************

    Sure, Charles that’s why only surgeons who have or have had cancer are qualified to operate to remove it. And lest you forgot, the most important court in a democracy doesn’t meet at any courthouse, but rather in the public square to discuss the issues of the day with admittedly less than perfect information. There is no such thing as “settled” law as long as we have functioning brains, hearts, and mouths.

    BTW, How’d that jury do with “perfect” information anyway?

  10. Vince:

    Black female venire members were systematically excluded from the panel by the defense for less than convincing reasons raising serious Batson questions. Florida abandoned the requirement that a defendant state a prima facie case of discrimination before prevailing in a Batson Motion. Melbourne, 679 So. 2d at 764 n.5 (noting that State v. Johans, 613 So. 2d 1319, 1322 (Fla. 1993) “eliminated the requirement that the opponent of the strike make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination.”). Why were there no African-American members on a jury in racially charged case where the population of African-Americans in the county approaches 50%?

    http://www.blacklegalissues.com/article_details.aspx?artclid=a14dda34c0

  11. All juries are “hand-picked.” That’s the way the system works. And, unless you were on that jury and considered all the evidence and law presented to you, you are simply not qualified to comment. You can like or not like the Zimmerman trial outcome, but your opinion is not relevant if you were not there.

  12. The entire premise of the Fourth Amendment is “chronology” – an individual crime has to occur and if there is probable cause that a suspect committed that crime (ex: Speeding away from crime scene immediately after the crime, DNA, etc.). After the crime, after the probable cause – police can then obtain search warrants (using signed affidavits by the officials) in front of a judge or magistrate. If police are looking for a rifle, they aren’t supposed to search in the desk drawer. The U.S. Supreme Court has made exceptions like “Plain a View” searches which are supposed to happen by coincidence. If a police officer by mere happenstance sees something illegal through a car window, etc.

    Short of a constitutional amendment, this is essentially how the Fourth Amendment is supposed to work. It is extremely clear if you read it.

    The Fourth Amendment was created to prevent “general warrants” by the British Redcoats during the 18th Century – today we have general warrants!

  13. “(4) 60.5% of all blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.”

    That seems to be a questionable statistic. The NYC ‘stop and frisk’ data seems to contradict that claim. Of course, NYC may not be typical of the entire nation, and the ‘stop and frisk’ data is not a random selection. However, it seems reasonable, to me, to believe that the non-random selection of individuals for ‘stop and frisk’ would result in finding more weapons not fewer. As a result, ‘stop and frisk’ would seem likely to overstate the number of weapons not understate that number.

    Scott Pilutik writing in Slate, Aug. 19, 2013, tells us that NYPD made 4.4 million stops in about 8.5 years. About half those stops resulted in frisks. About half of all those stopped were Black, another 30% were Hispanic.

    Weapons were seized in 1% of the stops of Blacks, 1.1% of stops of Hispanics, and 1.4% of stops of whites.

    Lets be clear about what the ‘stop and frisk’ data show: in approximately 2 million stops of Black citizens weapons were seized in 1% of those stops.

    I have not carefully cross checked all the data, but the Pilutik article seems reasonably consistent with the NYCLU numbers which are based on NYPD’s data.

    If the rest of the country is anything at all like NYC, it is just not true that ” 60.5% of all blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.”

    It is not clear what inferences you hope the reader will draw from you questionable statistics.

    If you want us to understand that minority communities are disproportionately victimized by violence then I don’t think you help your argument by overstating the case.

    If you are trying to suggest that minority communities are suspect and deserving of greater police scrutiny then I think you a victim of fallacious reasoning. Even if, for the sake of argument, we stipulate that minorities commit large number of crimes that does not imply that large numbers of minorities are criminals.

    Mayor Bloomberg himself fell victim to this fallacy when he attempted to justify ‘stop and frisk’ with the claim that 90% of murders are committed by minorities. In 2012 there were 420 murders. Bloomberg argues that the acts of 400 to 500 minority individuals should be used to take special action against 4.5 million minority citizens – the vast majority of whom are law abiding citizens.

    When we actually break down the numbers the outrageous racism of the Bloombergs of the word is apparent.

  14. How was Zimmerman’s jury “hand picked”? He had an all-woman jury in a self-defense case, a bad situation as any criminal trial lawyer will tell you. Both sides had input into the jury selection.

    Now, let’s judge everyone by what their estranged spouses and lovers say.

  15. I’m sorry but it’s difficult to write anything serious on this matter as chuckles keep erupting.

    White Privilege was on trial and White Privilege won. George is yours … love it and live with it.

  16. Mespo: Not totally disagreeing with you but we have an “Innocent until Proven Guilty” system where the “burden” of proof is on the accusers – not the accused. The Founding Fathers believed it is better to let a guilty person go free than to lock up an innocent person. Based on Old English law and well articulated by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers – the constitutional duty of a “jury” was a check & balance to prevent corruption by both the prosecutor and the judge.

    The southern courts during the Civil Rights era, where all white juries and racist judges that publicly called the attorneys representing African-American crime victims “Communist Jews” was a totally different set of problems: unbalanced jury selection and corrupt judges.

    Another factor in real life practice that plays into this: prosecutors and police will stretch any law to it’s breaking point and even sometimes violate laws when they see fit. So it’s always better to have stronger checks & balances, not weaker standards for executive branch officials.

  17. luckylarrysilverstein,

    THANKS FOR NOT “SHOUTING” … you can now blend into the background noise like the rest of you.

  18. What JONATHAN TURLEY should do is air some of the dastardly crimes committed by Blacks on other races in America, that are NOT being reported in the National media.

    And their are tons of these cases!

    But your Pavlovian puppies, Jonathan, always respond the way you set your article.

Comments are closed.