Two Broward Sheriff’s Office Deputies are under investigation after a videotape was discovered showing a deputy punching David Gonzalez in the face and then the deputies slamming him into the pavement. As shown by his mugshot, Gonzales was injured, including broken bones in his face. The officers have been identified as deputies Justin Lambert and Mike Manresa. They reportedly claimed that Gonzalez was drunk and resisting arrest but that is not what the videotape below indicates. The officers said that Gonzalez was abrasive and yelling at them and added “We then escorted Gonzalez to the ground.” That “escort” was preceded by a punch to the face before sending him face first into concrete.
Gonzalez, 50, says that he was merely speaking with the officers and trying to defend himself verbally when he was punched twice and then slammed into the pavement outside of a Texaco gas station in Deerfield Beach. He may have been intoxicated (a witness corroborated that fact) but the video is clearly at odds with what the officers reportedly claimed in their report.
Gonzales suffered a broken orbital bone as well as a cut over his eye. He was charged with resisting arrest without violence. That later part is key. The officers did not claim that Gonzalez was violent and yet he ended up with broken bones in his face.
Gonzalez is reportedly preparing a federal lawsuit for false arrest and excessive force. The first claim is particularly interesting since there does appear to be at least one witness confirming that he was drunk. However, he was not charged with public intoxication or disturbing the peace. Likewise, while the witness says that he stole candy and tried to trade a watch for beer, he was given only a warning on trespass at the scene. The charge was resisting without force. Nevertheless, it is the second charge that has the most promise in light of the video.
Notably, media reports state that three months ago, the department paid $350,000 to settle a federal lawsuit involving Deputy Lambert, who allegedly beat another Broward citizen. Lambert was accused of “striking, pummeling and pounding” a party host after responding to a noise complaint in Dania Beach back in 2009.
We have been following the continuing abuse of citizens who are detained or arrested for filming police in public. (For prior columns, click here and here). Despite consistent rulings upholding the right of citizens to film police in public, these abuses continue.
The video contradiction of the police account is all too familiar on this blog. Of course, in Dallas, Dallas Police Chief David Brown revealed a new policy that would require officers involved in a shooting to wait 72 hours before making a statement. The policy came after a scandal where a surveillance video showed one of Brown’s officers shooting a mentally ill suspect for no apparent reason. The video contradicted the officer’s testimony and undermined the charge against the victim. Brown’s solution was not greater disciplining and monitoring of officers but to impose a delay to allow officers to craft their statements.
The question is why Lambert was allowed back on the streets if the earlier account of the settled lawsuit is true. Moreover, there is the question as to the possibility of both criminal charges in this incident or whether both officers will be terminated if this tape is found to be an accurate account of what occurred. We have often seen officers charge victims of abuse with resisting arrest only for those charges to be dropped later. However, officers are often left on the force — even when thousands are paid out in civil damages or settlements.
Source: Local 10
32 thoughts on ““We Then Escorted Gonzalez To The Ground”: Two Florida Deputies Under Investigation After Videotape Shows Suspect Being Punched In The Face and Slammed Into The Pavement”
America is a democracy, and all celebrate this. Americans are authoritarian and support, often applauding, government use of force against people for trivial offenses. So, Americans get what they want – and what they are apparently willing to pay for. We now have a growing police state complete with daily YouTube videos of brutal government enforcers abusing people with impunity and the highest incarceration rate in the world. Ain’t government just grand?
Let’s not forget that police are nothing more than the enforcement mechanism employed to force people to comply with the desires of politicians. You know, those guys you vote for who are saintly people with wisdom far exceeding the normal human that promote the general welfare and the common good, and all that crap.
So, I can only conclude that things are the way they are simply because that is the way things should be as a consequence of the political system and government that Americans have adopted, support and cling to.
“Police mirror the violence practiced in government, the military, the “intelligence” services, the national policing institutions, corporations…against citizens, especially people of color and women.” -Theo
Add the mentally ill and homeless to the list and you’re spot on. Yep, America, as you say. “Exceptional”, isn’t it?
Police mirror the violence practiced in government, the military, the “intelligence” services, the national policing institutions, corporations, educational institutions, media, prisons, the pornography industry, et al. against citizens, especially people of color and women. The others do it with impunity. Why shouldn’t they? This is America, after all.
Max 1 its not who protects you from the police its what protects you from the police. Soon civilians will start to shoot first and ask questions later.
they already lost a lawsuit due to one of these allegedly offensive officers, and the city and PD did nothing. The only hope of changing their behavior is making a bigger dent in their pocketbook because the chances of the Prosecutors bringing these guys up on charges is slim to none.
rafflaw – to make a difference they have to get past the threshold of their insurance coverage. I don’t think this case will do it. It might though. However, if they think they are going to be sued, then their best defense is keeping the officer on staff, since firing him would be an admission of guilt.
Reblogged this on veritasusa.
Comments are closed.