I remember some bad school lunches but this is ridiculous. Parents in New Hanover, Pa., are outraged over the news that a recess aide at New Hanover Upper Frederick Elementary School served dog treats to the grade school students. The aide actually joked with the kids that the snacks were in fact dog treats and then told them he or she was kidding and that they were really snacks. The school says that the kids will be just fine since the treats would only harm those with allegories, though we have been reading how Chinese-made treats are being avoided by pet owners due to illnesses around the country being reported by pet owners. Some 75 fourth grade students received the dog treats. Some ate three or more of the “cookies” though it is not clear were told not to beg and to yield to commands.
When I read this story, I was fascinated by the legal recourse for parents if they or the kids complained about the trauma associated with eating dog food or treats. Could this make the minimal standard for a negligent infliction of emotional distress or even simply negligence? Without physical sickness, it would be only psychological harm which a court could find de minimis.
One student stated “I thought, wow, did I really eat dog treats? I was upset that our lunch aide, that we’re supposed to trust, who is supposed to take care of us, would do that to us.” That type of injury is not likely to be enough to sustain a legal claim, but would make for an interesting briefing. More importantly, parents could view litigation as the only way to get a clear understanding of what happened in this case.
It depends on the pet food, but just referring to categories like “meat” can be deceiving according to some sites: “However, about 50% of every food animal does not get used in human foods. Whatever remains of the carcass — heads, feet, bones, blood, intestines, lungs, spleens, livers, ligaments, fat trimmings, unborn babies, and other parts not generally consumed by humans — is used in pet food, animal feed, fertilizer, industrial lubricants, soap, rubber, and other products. These “other parts” are known as “by-products.” Manufacturers are not required to list any additives present in any given ingredient if it comprises 5% or less of the product excluding water and salt.
If families read about how dry treats are actually made, they will be even less happy because it is not just the uncertainty over the ingredients but the cooking process:
The dough is fed into the screws of an extruder. It is subjected to steam and high pressure as it is pushed through dies that determine the shape of the final product, much like the nozzles used in cake decorating. As the hot, pressurized dough exits the extruder, it is cut by a set of rapidly whirling knives into tiny pieces. As the dough reaches normal air pressure, it expands or “puffs” into its final shape. The food is allowed to dry, and then is usually sprayed with fat, digests, or other compounds to make it more palatable. When it is cooled, it can be bagged.
Although the cooking process kills bacteria in the ingredients, the final product can pick up more bacteria during the subsequent drying, coating, and packaging process. Some experts warn that getting dry food wet can allow the bacteria on the surface to multiply and make pets sick. Do not mix dry food with water, milk, canned food, or other liquids.
The school website discusses how the teachers have been implementing a new Healthy Bodies,Healthy Minds program. Some parents are likely to view that effort as, at best, half successful.
[The treat shown is simply a public domain image and not necessarily the treat given to the students or the treat involved in any of these studies]
24 thoughts on “In the Dog House: Pennsylvania School Gave Fourth Graders Dog Treats At Recess”
Evidently, I’m in need of being more (possible) – “fact specific”.
Does one wonder how the “aide” arrived at the logic to provide the “treats”? There’s the issue of – if – there was some other standard snack provided during the recess period?
If so – Where did the “regular” snacks go?
Did the “aide” actually “plan” the affair?
Or is it a case of the “regular” snack not being available and someone higher up “suggesting” the treats?
I’m just sayin……..
(rushes to judgment……..)
I agree with bettykath, in that I hope this Aide is looking for a new job.
It’s okay they don’t work in the cafeteria and plus she was the only mean one we call her hawk eyes
I can’t believe she would do that to me I go to that school and ate it
S K Carna, I doubt it. Kids ate these, FLOTUS food ends up in the trash. Kids won’t eat it.
If those kids are in Fourth Grade and do not know a dog bisquit from a human bisquit then they need mental health evaluation like the fat hog on the article above.
Just one problem with this post: how many kids do you think have allegories?
I wonder if these are on Michelle Obama’s School Lunch guidelines?
Hope they also don’t work in the cafeteria.
First of all (Professor) – kudos to the “it is not clear — ” reflection.
Secondly (if I were counsel), my argument would be reckless endangerment (based on the recent “news” of the Chinese treats exacerbation).
Finally, litigation would be “post” notification of administration and authorities with a subjective demand for discipline of removal of the offending teacher.
lobotomy, LOL! I was going to say something but you nailed it.
What on Earth was this aide thinking? S/he must want to be fired.
This raises some interesting questions for me. I told my aviation medical examiner that I work as a freight dog flying cargo, and he insisted that I needed annual distemper, and parvo shots. Do you think I need to find another doc, and/or could he be putting me on? Or alternatively, could I get cheaper shots by going to my dog’s vet?
Even Chinese allegories shouldn’t hurt the children.
Paul said, “I have some dog treats that look like Oreos. They even have the creamy inside frosting.”
Paul C. Schulte said, “Unless you have more of a description of the treat, it is hard to see if students were at risk.”
Dog treats are for dogs, not kids. You don’t give kids dog treats. Period.
I have some dog treats that look like Oreos. They even have the creamy inside frosting. Unless you have more of a description of the treat, it is hard to see if students were at risk.
I think we have all been harmed by “allegories.”
The fact is, a lot more nutritional effort goes into dog treats then does cookies or chips made for humans.
Well, on behalf of allegorical children everywhere, I am outraged.
I hope that one lunch aide is looking for a new job, preferably one that keeps him/her away from children and vulnerable adults.
Comments are closed.