Wonder Why The Folks In Ferguson Are Up In Arms About Their Police? Meet Sgt. Major Dan Page, St. Louis Co. P.D.

By Mark Esposito, Weekend Contributor

Watching the waves roll in here in Duck, NC, I have to admit things seem pretty peaceful and serene. It got me wondering why the folks in Ferguson, Mo. are demonstrating on a daily basis about their policing. Wonderment stopped last evening when I came across this video by 35-year veteran of the St. Louis County Police Department, Sgt. Major Dan Page.  Former Green Beret and supervising cop, Dan’s vaguely known to most  CNN viewers as the enlightened peace officer who shoved reporter Don Lemon from a Ferguson street corner as he tried reporting on the mass protest of 17-year-old Michael Brown’s police-facilitated killing. Lemon was shoved and then was herded to some “Free Speech Zone” in a remote parking lot. Now street-savvy Page is back … and with a right-wing philosophy and blood thirsty vengeance that you’d have to go to 1970s Cambodia to match — “We can kill you anyway we want!”

Speaking before a group called the Oath Keepers who bill themselves as “a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to ‘defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” (they sure look like a group of Doomsday Preppers to me), Page waxes eloquent and profane about all manner of right-wing blood boilers from his utter revulsion at the “Sodomites” on the United States Supreme Court ( four of ’em, you know) to those “weak” women in the military who are taking elite combat positions away from more qualified men to the race-based mess in Ferguson. By his own admission, Page “don’t trust nobody and I hate everybody. I hate y’all too I hate everybody. I’m into diversity. I kill everybody.”

What’ s even more remarkable is that his audience just loves him. This self-proclaimed group of “military, police and first responders” seems mesmerized by the rant which covers topics from the NDAA of 2012 explaining it’s just like the movie, Escape Plan, with Sly Stallone (That boat’s real. I know”) to domestic violence situations (“just shoot each other and get it over with”.)

 

Sarg also  tells us the word “gay” means happy and that’s it.  A pox on those sodomites. He doesn’t like lawyers. Not crazy about women. He reminds us that the President has no control as Commander in-Chief over the Marines or the Air Force since the U.S. Constitution doesn’t say so. (See, gotcha).  He calls the Marines the world’s finest fighting force but decries it’s “feminization” (as in allowing women to serve in combat roles) at the hands of Obama and it’s “log-head” commandant. Page even mixes in a little fire and brimstone jurisprudence reminding us that you can’t have the Constitution without the Bible and he stands at the podium thumping the Good Book. Page can’t resist that favorite of all right-wing circus acts that Obama is really an illegal alien from Kenya.  All in all it’s quite an audition tape for a pundit job on Fox News.

The video did serve to answer my question about all the fuss in Ferguson, but curiously left unanswered  why the whole audience of people Missourians hire to protect all of them didn’t walk out en masse. Maybe they agree is one chilling answer. After all, Page did get a snazzy Oath Keepers patch for his trouble to the vigorous applause of the audience.

My advice to the folks in Ferguson is that if this guy is a core sampling of the prevailing attitude of the public servants in St. Louis County …  well, since we’re talking movies here, remember that classic horror flick, When a Stranger Calls?:

 Jill, Jill. We traced the call! It’s coming from inside the house! Do you hear me? It’s coming from inside the house! You need to get out! Jill?

If you’ve got the stomach, here’s the video and a play-by-play from Crooks and Liars:

1:07: Talks about all men being created equal then went on to say “That does not mean affirmative action”.
1:26: Rants about hate crime laws
3:22: Black (little?) Perverts [ed. note: I think he said “black robed perverts” but the other way ’round wouldn’t surprise me]
5:25: Talks about doing a fair share of killing
15:40: Calls supreme court justice a homosexual sodomite.
18:30 “If I die I go to heaven… I died a long time ago”
20:30: Talks about St. Louis County schools
26:40: Calls President Obama an illegal alien
27:00: We can kill you anyway we want
31:38: Goes on anti-muslim rant
37:00: Talks about being a Saint Louis County Cop
43:00: Talk about killing people again
46:41: Goes on rant over being briefed about the 9/11 attacks on Aug 1st 1999 then says 9/11 happened 30 days later also talks about no weapons of mass destruction being found in Afghanistan.
49:22: Continues rant about having secret clearance at Fort (Leavenworth?) and training with Russian spetsnaz
52:40: Says people involved in domestic violence should “just shoot each other and get it over with”.
53:15: Somebody like me is going to come in and kill you
56:20: I don’t trust nobody and I hate everybody. I hate y’all too I hate everybody. I’m into diversity. I kill everybody.
58:02: Audience member: So what happens when good men like you are retiring from the military. What kind of military do we have left then?
58:15: Sodomites and females. End of statement.
1:01:00: Rants about female green beret
1:03:00 He’s handed an oathkeeper patch

 

Epilogue:

St. Louis County Police Chief  Jon Belmar, who immediately defended the shooting of  Michael Brown by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson,   issued the following statement about Page via Twitter:

Some of you may have already seen the video of the St. Louis County Police Officer speaking off-duty at an Oath Keepers event. If you haven’t we are sure you will in the coming days as news circulates the release of the video.

Chief Jon Belmar was notified of this video’s existence today and upon a abbreviated viewing of the video was disturbed by the conversation being had. Chief Belmar does not expect this kind of rhetoric from his officers, just like they don’t expect it from him.

Chief Belmar, on behalf of the St. Louis County Police Department, would like to apologize to the community, anyone that video has or will effect, and to the other hard working officers on the detail with the officer in question because they deserve better than that. While the officer has never been involved in an officer involved shooting, the statements made about killing are unacceptable and not what we are about as a Department.

We hold our officers to a high standard of honor both on and off duty. While we as a department do not have an issue with officers expressing themselves, this was disturbing and unacceptable. The officer is a 35 year veteran of this department and has been deployed numerous times in military service. He had passed the evaluations upon returning from deployment and there was no indication of this attitude.

Chief Belmar would again like to apologize to anyone this video has offended and ask any videos of this nature be reported so we can take proper action against any officer not meeting our standards.

Being from Missouri, Belmar should have no problem with  my skepticism:  Show Me.

~Mark Esposito, Weekend Contributor

By the way and for better or worse, the views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not necessarily those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays of art are solely the author’s decision and responsibility. No infringement of intellectual property rights is intended and will be remedied upon notice from the owner. Fair use is however asserted for such inclusions of quotes, excerpts, photos, art, and the like.

 

613 thoughts on “Wonder Why The Folks In Ferguson Are Up In Arms About Their Police? Meet Sgt. Major Dan Page, St. Louis Co. P.D.”

  1. Elain M.
    Why Isn’t Tear Gas Illegal?
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/02/why_isnt_tear_gas_illegal.html

    he 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention doesn’t apply to domestic law enforcement. (The United States was a major proponent of the exemption, fearing that the convention might be interpreted to prohibit lethal injection.) The most common lacrimator used for riot control is a compound called 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile , or CS. (It’s not actually a gas so much as a powder that’s usually mixed with smoke to create an airborne agent.)
    (continued)

    In short: It never is illegal when the USA uses it on their citizens.

  2. Max, “Why would the police conceal evidence in an officer related shooting.”

    Because, as the saying goes, that’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works.

    Educate yourself!!! Maybe then you could figure out why the police don’t release anything but basic information until it goes before the Grand Jury (a grand jury that was assembled back in May…not just for this incident).

  3. Jack,

    Thanks. I hadn’t seen that.

    John,

    Still denying the existence of mayonnaise? Still? Wow.

    Tell you what: go to your fridge and watch the mayo. Get back to us when it “reverts.” Or, better yet, have you’re grandchildren get back to us.

    The persistence of creationism is beginning to make much more sense to me.

  4. In one breath a commenter posts a link about how this is a war on the poor and disenfranchised, then posts another link about how this is class warfare, without any added distinction, examplifying how folks are not just hung up on comments by others, but by their very own comments. It’s like echo competition here, people totally oblivious to economic and cultural forces. I know 5th graders who have better handle on reality, displaying a helluva lot more empathy, too. But then most fifth graders haven’t yet signed on to furthering an agenda. And they probably have better things to do with their time.

  5. Annie, Shortly after the protests began, one of the local Democrat representatives blamed what was taking lace on not having enough black representatives.

    It’s kind of hard to not make the connection when you setup a voter registration stand at the place where Michael Brown was killed.

  6. Jack,
    I’m guessing the WHY answer is analogous to why police don’t like being filmed while on duty… it might reveal illegal acts they do.

  7. Jack,
    My question stands unanswered:
    Why would the police conceal evidence in an officer related shooting.

    NOTE:
    This concealment happened prior to the announced Grand Jury.

  8. After 200+ posts I’m wondering why this is considered a legal blog? You all make the Camp Pendleton Mud Run seem like a CDC clean room.

    Right about now I’m guessing the score is tied with no forecast for one ounce of real legal analysis.

  9. “Police Violence Has Been Going On Forever. No Wonder People Are Fed Up With It”

    The Huffington Post | By Natasha Bach

    Posted: 08/23/2014 12:00 pm EDT

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/23/police-brutality-michael-brown_n_5700970.html

    “The fact remains that we do not know how many people are killed in police shootings annually, but we do know that at least five unarmed black men have been killed by police in the last month alone.”

  10. Some could think this was Ferguson… Molotov cocktail, what it really looks like.

  11. Max, There are times when you have to use your head for more than a place to put your hat.

    If Officer Wilson had been hospitalized after the incident, there would be a reasonable delay in getting him to file an incident report. Wouldn’t you agree? How long would that be? A. I guess it would have to do with how badly the officer was injured. Wouldn’t it?

    Truth be told, neither you, nor I, nor Carlos Miller, have any idea if and when the officer filed an incident report.

  12. Tear gas is an abortifacient. Are police aware of this?

    http://www.thenation.com/blog/181318/tear-gas-abortifacient-why-wont-anti-abortion-movement-oppose-it

    Excerpt:
    They were right: though rigorous studies are few, there is evidence that tear gas is an abortifacient. In 2011, Chile temporarily suspended its use after a University of Chile study linked it to miscarriage and fetal harm. Investigating the use of tear gas in Bahrain in 2012, Physicians for Human Rights found that local doctors were reporting increased numbers of miscarriages in exposed areas. And UN officials have connected tear gas to miscarriages in the Palestinian territories.

    This means it’s likely that police in Ferguson, Missouri, have been spraying abortion-causing chemicals on crowds of civilians. Recently at TheNation.com, Dani McClain wrote about the killing of black youth as a reproductive justice issue, one that goes to the heart of the rights of parents to raise their children in peace, safety and dignity. She’s correct, of course, but if the anti-abortion movement were actually concerned about the well-being of the unborn, then the violence in Ferguson would be a pro-life issue as well.

    1. Elaine – this is news to me. I guess they will have to start shooting rubber bullets or bean bags or use tasers. Do they cause abortions or miscarriages?

  13. Jack
    Just be glad these molotov cocktail throwers of your’s weren’t beheading journalists in the streets, too.

  14. The source of Jack’s MC photo:

    http://www.christenacleveland.com/2014/08/the-cross-and-the-molotov-cocktail/

    “Based on data from communities all over the U.S., a recent study found that local police officers kill black men nearly two times a week. Beyond this, black men suffer from the crushing indignity of being regularly stopped and frisked, harassed by the police for simply “driving while black”, and generally assumed guilty before proven innocent.

    Describing the way black men were treated during the lynching era (1880s -1960s), historian Joel Williamson wrote, “Their blackness alone was license enough to line them up against walls, to menace them with guns, to search them roughly, beat them, and rob them of every vestige of dignity.”[i]

    Williamson might as well have been writing about the way black men are treated in 2014. The present-day experience of black men is not much different that the experience of black men who lived and died during the lynching era.”

    http://www.christenacleveland.com/2013/04/listening-well-as-a-person-of-privilege-seek-to-understand-and-embrace-anger/

  15. Squeeky
    Why didn’t the officer fill out his report like he was supposed to do?
    Questioning those motives is NOT a lynching, rather instead, logical questions. To purposely confuse the two speaks more about your racist big toe than it does the dead man lying in the street for hours in the community he lived in.

  16. Jack,
    Who said that under representation had any bearing on Michael Brown’s death? Your strawman?

    1. Max-1 – they took the officer to the hospital to be treated. You wanted him to wait and write the report before being treated?

  17. Anyone attempting to claim that insufficient black representation has any bearing on Michael Brown’s death or the investigation is a race baiter. Plain and simple.

Comments are closed.