By Mark Esposito, Weekend Contributor
Watching the waves roll in here in Duck, NC, I have to admit things seem pretty peaceful and serene. It got me wondering why the folks in Ferguson, Mo. are demonstrating on a daily basis about their policing. Wonderment stopped last evening when I came across this video by 35-year veteran of the St. Louis County Police Department, Sgt. Major Dan Page.  Former Green Beret and supervising cop, Dan’s vaguely known to most  CNN viewers as the enlightened peace officer who shoved reporter Don Lemon from a Ferguson street corner as he tried reporting on the mass protest of 17-year-old Michael Brown’s police-facilitated killing. Lemon was shoved and then was herded to some “Free Speech Zone” in a remote parking lot. Now street-savvy Page is back … and with a right-wing philosophy and blood thirsty vengeance that you’d have to go to 1970s Cambodia to match — “We can kill you anyway we want!”
Speaking before a group called the Oath Keepers who bill themselves as “a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to ‘defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” (they sure look like a group of Doomsday Preppers to me), Page waxes eloquent and profane about all manner of right-wing blood boilers from his utter revulsion at the “Sodomites” on the United States Supreme Court ( four of ’em, you know) to those “weak” women in the military who are taking elite combat positions away from more qualified men to the race-based mess in Ferguson. By his own admission, Page “don’t trust nobody and I hate everybody. I hate y’all too I hate everybody. I’m into diversity. I kill everybody.”
What’ s even more remarkable is that his audience just loves him. This self-proclaimed group of “military, police and first responders” seems mesmerized by the rant which covers topics from the NDAA of 2012 explaining it’s just like the movie, Escape Plan, with Sly Stallone (That boat’s real. I know”) to domestic violence situations (“just shoot each other and get it over with”.)
Sarg also  tells us the word “gay” means happy and that’s it.  A pox on those sodomites. He doesn’t like lawyers. Not crazy about women. He reminds us that the President has no control as Commander in-Chief over the Marines or the Air Force since the U.S. Constitution doesn’t say so. (See, gotcha).  He calls the Marines the world’s finest fighting force but decries it’s “feminization” (as in allowing women to serve in combat roles) at the hands of Obama and it’s “log-head” commandant. Page even mixes in a little fire and brimstone jurisprudence reminding us that you can’t have the Constitution without the Bible and he stands at the podium thumping the Good Book. Page can’t resist that favorite of all right-wing circus acts that Obama is really an illegal alien from Kenya.  All in all it’s quite an audition tape for a pundit job on Fox News.
The video did serve to answer my question about all the fuss in Ferguson, but curiously left unanswered  why the whole audience of people Missourians hire to protect all of them didn’t walk out en masse. Maybe they agree is one chilling answer. After all, Page did get a snazzy Oath Keepers patch for his trouble to the vigorous applause of the audience.
My advice to the folks in Ferguson is that if this guy is a core sampling of the prevailing attitude of the public servants in St. Louis County …  well, since we’re talking movies here, remember that classic horror flick, When a Stranger Calls?:
 Jill, Jill. We traced the call! It’s coming from inside the house! Do you hear me? It’s coming from inside the house! You need to get out! Jill?
If you’ve got the stomach, here’s the video and a play-by-play from Crooks and Liars:
1:07: Talks about all men being created equal then went on to say “That does not mean affirmative action”.
1:26: Rants about hate crime laws
3:22: Black (little?) Perverts [ed. note: I think he said “black robed perverts” but the other way ’round wouldn’t surprise me]
5:25: Talks about doing a fair share of killing
15:40: Calls supreme court justice a homosexual sodomite.
18:30 “If I die I go to heaven… I died a long time ago”
20:30: Talks about St. Louis County schools
26:40: Calls President Obama an illegal alien
27:00: We can kill you anyway we want
31:38: Goes on anti-muslim rant
37:00: Talks about being a Saint Louis County Cop
43:00: Talk about killing people again
46:41: Goes on rant over being briefed about the 9/11 attacks on Aug 1st 1999 then says 9/11 happened 30 days later also talks about no weapons of mass destruction being found in Afghanistan.
49:22: Continues rant about having secret clearance at Fort (Leavenworth?) and training with Russian spetsnaz
52:40: Says people involved in domestic violence should “just shoot each other and get it over with”.
53:15: Somebody like me is going to come in and kill you
56:20: I don’t trust nobody and I hate everybody. I hate y’all too I hate everybody. I’m into diversity. I kill everybody.
58:02: Audience member: So what happens when good men like you are retiring from the military. What kind of military do we have left then?
58:15: Sodomites and females. End of statement.
1:01:00: Rants about female green beret
1:03:00 He’s handed an oathkeeper patch
Epilogue:
St. Louis County Police Chief  Jon Belmar, who immediately defended the shooting of  Michael Brown by Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson,  issued the following statement about Page via Twitter:
Some of you may have already seen the video of the St. Louis County Police Officer speaking off-duty at an Oath Keepers event. If you haven’t we are sure you will in the coming days as news circulates the release of the video.
Chief Jon Belmar was notified of this video’s existence today and upon a abbreviated viewing of the video was disturbed by the conversation being had. Chief Belmar does not expect this kind of rhetoric from his officers, just like they don’t expect it from him.
Chief Belmar, on behalf of the St. Louis County Police Department, would like to apologize to the community, anyone that video has or will effect, and to the other hard working officers on the detail with the officer in question because they deserve better than that. While the officer has never been involved in an officer involved shooting, the statements made about killing are unacceptable and not what we are about as a Department.
We hold our officers to a high standard of honor both on and off duty. While we as a department do not have an issue with officers expressing themselves, this was disturbing and unacceptable. The officer is a 35 year veteran of this department and has been deployed numerous times in military service. He had passed the evaluations upon returning from deployment and there was no indication of this attitude.
Chief Belmar would again like to apologize to anyone this video has offended and ask any videos of this nature be reported so we can take proper action against any officer not meeting our standards.
Being from Missouri, Belmar should have no problem with  my skepticism:  Show Me.
~Mark Esposito, Weekend Contributor
By the way and for better or worse, the views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not necessarily those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays of art are solely the author’s decision and responsibility. No infringement of intellectual property rights is intended and will be remedied upon notice from the owner. Fair use is however asserted for such inclusions of quotes, excerpts, photos, art, and the like.
Paul, Sharpton gives him cover. In that 10 minute segment on MTP Sharpton praised Obama on being prudent and not fanning the flames in Ferguson. Sharpton keeps the poor black folk in line for the Prez. You should read Maureen Dowd today. She ripped Obama a new one on Ferguson, ISIS, etc. This is going to be the longest 2 years of his life, and maybe ours too!
Elaine – I would not know how to go through the archives to find the comments. However, I think one them was named Gene. He made a visit about a month after I arrived here. Does that name ring a bell?
Paul,
Please provide evidence to back up your claim.
Now, That’s what I’m talkin’ about.
Samantha w/ a SUBSTANTIVE haymaker! Way to go, you evil, non liberal woman!
Bettykath,
Next up: I’ll be accused of being intellectually dishonest for speaking the truth.
With bettykath’s seemingly limitless empathy, she would easily identify with the following words, which words are actually her own (above @ 1:25), after I’ve taken the liberty to modify.
Pro-choice privilege is something that the death folks have whether they want it or not. There are those who abuse that privilege. I do wish some of the deniers could spend a few days at a liberal campus, in a major news room, or in an abortion clinic, just to name a few places. Just a few days as their pro-choice skinned self and then a few days with a pro-life emblem on their chest so they could find out that they are not hassled when they arrive pro-choice, but then get ostracized, bullied, spit on, demonized, robbed, assaulted, denied constitutional protections and personal freedoms. As tight as it gets for pro-choice folks, it’s way tighter for pro-life folks, because other pro-choice folks are in charge.
The same thing could be said for anyone who is christian, much less for anyone who defends religious expression.
Squeeky, Brava!
Al Sharpton was on MTP. Since Howdy Doody finally got the ax they had this lightweight from MSNBC, Chris Jannsen hosting. Her tease going into the last segment was “Al Sharpton, is he a help or hindrance?” So, I stayed tune when I normally don’t watch that charlatan. Well, it was like batting practice. There were no questions challenging Sharpton. She was a good white girl, being white guilty. She praised him for his close relationship w/ the WH. She praised him for all his work and that he will be giving the eulogy @ the Brown funeral tomorrow. But, she got me. The tease was a lie and she made me waste 10 minutes of my life I’ll never get back.
Nick – for some reason Sharpton has become Obama’s go-to guy for race relations.
Bettykath,
What do you know? You’re clueless and have no street cred!
😉
@NickS
I agree that we should get back to substance. Sooo, here is an Irish Poem to help!
Substance Abuse???
An Irish Poem by Squeeky Fromm
No, “substance” should not be abused!
Not even when egos are bruised.
Plus, Turley will vent
Then delete your comment,
And tell you he is not amused!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Paul Schulte,
You’re wrong, once again. You were not privy to the conversations that guest bloggers had with Jonathan. I was. Yes, some guest bloggers chose to leave. Jonathan didn’t give them an ultimatum. He’s a defender of free speech.
Elaine – it was a conference call? I just know that two ex-GBers came on here a couple of months ago and said they had been forced out.
I told you. He’s already making stuff up.
It’s getting titty/tatty. Let’s get back to substance. How about an agreement, if we have nothing of substance to contribute on this thread we’ll abstain.
Larry (rafflaw), Man up! You’re a guest blogger here. Professor Turley has stated that “On our blog, we have all been enriched by the commentary and insights of Larry Rafferty. Larry is an attorney from Chicago…”
http://jonathanturley.org/2012/04/29/farewell-to-captain-lawrence-e-rafferty-american-hero/
I was looking around on that thread for your complaint about JT providing your “background” to newer commenters. I must have missed it.
bk, You are apparently down w/ the struggle in the abstract, and clueless about the reality. Folks seem to forget what I do for a living. If you had street cred you would be announcing it from the rooftops.
Bettykath, precisely.
Elaine, roflol. He really thinks everyone’s background is his business. I’m sure he’ll make something up. I’m surprised, with all his background, that he’s so clueless.
Rafflaw,
Nick will tell you what you think…and how you feel about issues, etc. He’s the blog interpreter, doncha know??? He’s in charge of providing background info on the people who comment on this blog. He is completely unbiased!
raff, For chrissake, you have accepted being a Chicagoan for the 2 years I’ve been here. When I blast Chicago politics you protect it like a mamma bear. Stop being a nit picky attorney, you’re a Chicagoan and you have been proud of it until JUST NOW! And, read again what I said about you vis a vis the 2nd Amendment. Finally, I provide background to help people understand w/ whom they’re discussing a subject. It helps in the discussion. I got much help when I arrived here from idealist and others to understand the cast of characters. It helped me immensely and I just am paying that forward.
Nick,
As usual you are wrong. I would not vote to rescind the 2nd Amendment. I believe that there is a reason why it was the second amendment, behind the First Amendment. Another thing that you are wrong about is that I am not from Chicago. I am from a suburb of Chicago. I didn’t think it was your job to try to provide “background” to newer commenters? Maybe I missed that memo.
Jack,
Thanks for thinking of me.