“Stop White People”: Resident Advisers Create Controversial Course

UnknownThere is a controversy at State University of New York (SUNY) that is reminiscent of our recent discussion about the exclusion of white students in a housing advertisement at Claremont. The SUNY controversy concerns a course put together by Resident Advisors Ciaran Slattery, Nicholas Pulakos, and Urenna Nwogwugwu, entitled “#StopWhitePeople2K16.” Once again, the controversy raises the question of equal treatment at universities since SUNY would presumably react aggressively at RAs holding a course entitled “#StopBlackPeople2K16.”

The RAs insist that they merely want to “help others take the next step in understanding diversity, privilege, and the society we function within” by teaching the “tools” to respond to “uneducated people. Resident Advisers hold official positions with the university and are selected to serve as counselors as well as resident authorities.

Much of this controversy could be addressed by SUNY by saying that it treats any course as protected under free speech, including the type of inverse course title discussed above. However, it is clear that such a course would not be tolerated. So what is the standard?

65 thoughts on ““Stop White People”: Resident Advisers Create Controversial Course”

  1. OK I didn’t get anything from the article, based on other comments I guess this course is about eliminating White people White people are eliminating themselves because currently White death is outpacing White birth..

  2. Fully expected more substance in comments here- but no luck. “Stop Black People” messages are thinly veiled in code, as we all must know. So persistent have these messages been, they don’t need to be overtly taught. Loud objections to any pushback by people of color is certain, since blame-the-victim is a regular part of our hype culture. Whatever we white people do or say, the genie isn’t going back in the bottle and passive subservience will not return. Get over it.

    1. You don’t just get to holler, “victim blaming!” and then run off as if you provided an intelligent analysis of a problem.

      You say the phrase, “blame the victim”, as if that is just somehow automatically the wrong thing to do. But what if the victim really is the person bringing the harm on themselves???

      For example, HIV and men who have sex with men. How do they get HIV? They let somebody sodomize them without a condom. Sooo, don’t they bring it on themselves? Is it going to do any good to blame “stigma” in some fuzzy sort of way, when it is the victim himself who is engaging in the very behavior that causes the disease? Wouldn’t gay men just be better off if we blamed HIV on them, and their behavior? Because then everybody would know how to fix it. And there would not be a time and money waste on idiocy like “stigma.”

      Same with black people. Jesus H. Christ, but the sorry SOB’s have a 75% illegitimate birth rate! And they want to blame their problems on white people, and white privilege, and institutionalized racism, and post traumatic slavery disorder, and God knows what else. And you actually have stupid white people who buy into that nonsense???

      Watch the video I put above, and go invest the $20 or so to buy the book, and quit hurting black people with your stupidity!

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

  3. Well, I just finished reading a book by a black dude named Jason Riley, called “Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed.”

    There is a video on youtube about it, since Amazon stuff gets trapped in the spam filter. To be candid, I have not yet watched the video, but will shortly. Because unlike some people here, I don’t post links to stuff I haven’t read, or watched, unless I admit it up front.


    Sooo, if you are one of those silly college educated white people who is all wrapped up in White Guilt, or in dressing up like a 1960’s Freedom Rider, this book is for you. If you are somebody who buys into the Liberal/Democratic Party race narrative, that blacks are victims, and are where they are today because of White Privilege, Institutionalized Racism, Post Traumatic Slavery Disorder, and that kind of crap, this book is for you.

    Because you mentally-ill, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy sick, reprehensible individuals should really quit hurting black people, and making their lives worse!

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

  4. White people got no reason.
    White people got no reason…
    White people got no reason to live!

    They got little bitty minds..
    And little bitty feet.
    Little bitty voices going beep beep beep.

    Don’t want no White People!
    Don’t want no White People round here!

    –Randy Newman (from Short People)

    And remember: Black Labradors Lives Matter! BLLM

    1. BLM – since you are attacking white people I assume you will not be offended if I want all Black Labradors euthanized? Tit-for-tat

  5. Art,

    Stop calling me names. I am not lying and I am not a twit. The fact that you resort to name calling instead of reasoned argument shows you have no real argument to make. Otherwise, you would have made one.

    I refer anyone to watch the video and make up their own mind about the situation. Here is the link:


      1. Art,

        You just keep repeating personal attacks. Make your argument. Here’s the video so people can make up their own minds. I’m not afraid of the information in the video. Are you? It seems like you are terrified of people watching this video and thinking about it. There’s no reason to shut me up except fear that information will be released publicly which you do not want people to know about. Why not let people decide things for themselves?


        1. Jill.

          The best way to deal with trolls is to ignore them. If you respond that is to him a reward, it tells him he has gotten under your skin.

  6. bettykath,

    Here is a discussion about the coup in Honduras on Democracy Now. In this discussion you will find the following diversity: 1. A black male president and 2. a white female who fully support the coup and current military dictatorship which is headed by an Hispanic man 3. an indigenous woman who was against the coup, an environmentalist, who was killed by the military dictatorship (run by a Hispanic man) which is supported by a US black male president, a former white female SOS, a current white male VP and current white male SOS. The powerful people were all connected to great wealth. The people who are suffering are poor, mostly Hispanic women and men.

    You will further see Hispanic women protesting Hillary Clinton at a speech by Bill Clinton, a white male, where they are promptly removed by police of varying colors, some black, some white.

    Now “Stopping White People” won’t allow people to understand this situation. There are many colors, classes, genders etc. involved in this horrific violence. For example, since Obama is a black man, they would have to rule out his part in working with the coup and its aftermath, the military dictatorship.

    Diversity isn’t really just about stopping white people, but is actually about diversity. Check it out!


  7. Actually, the first slaves in North American arrived in the 16th century and were under the “ownership” of the Spanish who preferred imported African slaves to the Native Americans who were also enslaved.

  8. I am reminded that I need to go back and re watch “Amazing Grace” – the Brits outlawed slavery way before we did.

      1. Johnna – the British turned the slave trade into a 3 continent business.

  9. Hillary’s Race War

    Disgusting lies, smears and hate.

    August 26, 2016

    Daniel Greenfield

    Hillary Clinton has met with leaders of a racist hate group responsible for torching cities and inciting the murders of police officers.

    Deray McKesson, one of the Black Lives Matter hate group leaders she met with, had praised the looting of white people and endorsed cop killers Assata Shakur and Mumia Abu-Jamal. The Black Lives Matter hate group had specifically made a point of targeting white people in “white spaces” for harassment. It would go on to incite the mass murder of police officers in Dallas and other racist atrocities.

    Despite all this, Hillary Clinton has never disavowed the racist hate group. Instead she doubled down on supporting the hate group and its icons at the Democratic National Convention.

    Now, after Trump’s appeal to the black community, Hillary is desperately trying to divide us by race.

    Despite Hillary’s latest hypocritical and self-serving accusations, Donald Trump has never held a meeting with leaders of a racist hate group. Hillary Clinton has. And she has refused all calls by police unions to end her support for a vicious hate group that has championed the release of cop killers and endorsed BDS against Israel.

    When an 83-year-old great grandmother is viciously beaten by racist thugs and then set on fire, Hillary Clinton has nothing to say. She has remained silent about the wave of racist violence by her political allies that is sweeping this country and leaving victims battered or dead.

    Hillary is trading on accusations of racism to distract attention from her ugly record of pandering to racists to get ahead. As Trump has said, “It’s the oldest play in the Democratic playbook. When Democratic policies fail, they are left with only this one tired argument. You’re racist, you’re racist, you’re racist!”

    It’s not Hillary Clinton who has a consistent track record of opposing racists, but Donald Trump.

    Trump’s first entry into presidential politics was a bid to block Pat Buchanan from gaining the Reform Party nomination. Trump accused Buchanan of anti-Semitism, racism and Nazi sympathies.

    Hillary Clinton claimed that Trump had refused to disavow racist leader David Duke. But Trump had already rejected Duke back when he was considering a presidential campaign in 2000. “So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman—Mr. Duke, a Neo-Nazi—Mr. Buchanan, and a Communist—Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.”

    If only Hillary Clinton had been as consistent in rejecting the company of Communists, Nazis and assorted racists as Trump has been.

    Instead Hillary Clinton met with Black Lives Matter racist DeRay McKesson who spends his time denouncing “whiteness.” And on the other side of the racial line, Hillary Clinton praised the “courage, tenacity and vision” of Margaret Sanger who had delivered a speech to the KKK and whose Negro Project had promoted racial eugenics. Sanger’s pamphlet, “What Every Girl Should Know,” had described Australian aborigines as “the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development”. If this isn’t racism, I don’t know what is.

    But according to Hillary Clinton, killing black babies and promoting hatred against white people isn’t racist. But criticizing what the Democrats have done to black communities is.

    In her speech, Hillary Clinton denounced Trump’s criticisms of the Democratic exploitation of black communities as racist. According to Hillary Clinton, when Trump bemoaned poverty, lack of ownership and blight in black communities under Democratic rule, that was bigoted.

    It’s the opposite of bigotry. Hillary Clinton is so threatened by Trump’s challenge to Democratic hegemony in the black community that she has been forced to resort to the most “tired” of arguments.

    There is no defending the track record of the Democrats in black communities. All that Hillary can do is accuse those who point to the tragedy of the inner city of being racists.

    The rest of Hillary Clinton’s accusations are equally absurd.

    Hillary Clinton accused Trump of somehow being involved with anti-Semitism. This is the same man who said, “I want to thank my Jewish daughter. I have a Jewish daughter.”

    The idea that Trump has anything in common with Richard Spencer, the anti-Semitic bigot who coined the term “Alt-Right,” is absurd. There are members of the Alt-Right using Trump to promote themselves. But Trump has no idea who or what they are. And, unlike Hillary, he has a track record of rejecting them.

    But Hillary is rerunning her old “vast right-wing conspiracy” meme. Its purpose is to turn the tables on her critics. But her speech is a bizarre rant which claims that Putin has masterminded some sort of global nationalist conspiracy. But Putin isn’t interested in American nationalism. He doesn’t want a strong America. He wants a weak America. He wants the America of Hillary Clinton stretching out a reset button to one of his lackeys and asking the Russian tyranny to forgive us for George W. Bush.

    Hillary Clinton denounces Trump as paranoid, but it’s her speech that is throbbing with unhinged paranoia, vague rumors and guilt by association. Even as she tries to claim the mantle of the optimistic candidate, her campaign runs on conspiracy theories and alliances with the vilest of racists.

    The Obama years have been the biggest gift to racists of all shades and colors. During his time in office, both the black and white view of race relations has plummeted dramatically. If racist hate groups of both colors are in ascendance, it’s not because of Trump, but because of Obama.

    And four to eight years of Hillary continuing this ugly legacy would see them grow even further.

    Why would racists want Trump, who has denounced them, when they can have Hillary?

    Why would Putin want a stronger America, when he can have more of the inept fumbling and appeasement of the Obama years?

    Why would anyone believe Hillary Clinton’s paranoid conspiracy theories when they make no sense?

    If Vladimir Putin had wanted to dictate our foreign policy, he couldn’t have done any better than Obama. If black and white racists had wanted to divide us by race, they couldn’t have done any better than Obama.

    Hillary Clinton’s disgusting accusations are an attempt to divert attention from the real issues that Trump has raised, from black suffering under Democratic rule to Islamic terrorism.

    As Trump has said, “People who speak out against radical Islam, and who warn about refugees, are not Islamophobes. They are decent American citizens who want to uphold our values as a tolerant society, and who want to keep the terrorists out of our country.”

    Hillary Clinton wants to bring the terrorists to this country. She wants to continue destroying our national security the way that her mentor in the White House has been doing.

    And she will tell any lie and launch any smear to crawl her way to power. Now she’s trying to play on racial divisions while trying to attribute her own tactics to Donald Trump.

  10. If they created a course entitled “Stop Black People,” they would call it what it is: racist.

    For some reason, this concept is confusing if you substitute a different race. And there is a surprising amount of pushback against the obvious fact that these kinds of policies do not build bridges, but divide.

  11. White people will disappear as intermarriage accelerates. It’s really no big deal. And, unless there is a huge psychological evolutionary leap, people will continue to demonize “the other” based on real and imagined differences. I’m praying for the evolutionary leap myself.

    1. Yeah, but with only about 25% of black women getting married at all, it might take a while from that end. More likely, black men will just give up entirely on the crazy, trashy majority of black women, and opt out for white chicks, asian chicks, hispanic chicks, just any woman that doesn’t have a no-brain head full of hair weave and more testosterone than they have.

      Watch you some Tommy Sotomayor videos on youtube!

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

    2. White people will disappear as intermarriage accelerates.

      About 7% of caucasians marry blacks or orientals nowadays About one-third of these marriages are to orientals. You’re talking the Keynesian long run, when we’re all dead.

      1. Art Deco – there are two side to an intermarriage. As whites disappear, so will blacks, Asians, etc.

        1. More likely Amerindians, most of whom marry out, and more likely North American orientals. Negroid features are more persistent o’er the generations than oriental features.

Comments are closed.