My Family And 9/11

By Darren Smith, Weekend Contributor.

On this fifteenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks millions in the United States and the world reflect back on those terrible events, where we were, and how it affected each of us in our own unique ways–but sharing of course a familiar story. My own family certainly was not an exception.

If our experience can be summed into one word, I cannot find one more telling of how we avoided tragedy:

Luck

For me news of the events came forth in a telephone call from my mother asking me to turn on the television. She told me that one of the twin towers was hit by an aircraft and it was certainly a terrorist attack. I turned on the set and within five or so minutes of watching the live recording I saw one of the towers fall. I’ve seen horrific events in my life but this sight was one of the most unsettling I experienced–thinking in my mind that I probably witnessed the murder of perhaps a thousand people at that moment.

We all are familiar with the particulars of the events affecting each of us in some way. I to this day will turn the channel if the towers’ collapse is shown.

As the events went by we later learned of the Pentagon attack. I thought of my Brother-in-Law who works there. My wife tried over the hours to contact him and her family to find out if he was still with us and uninjured. But so was everyone else as the phone lines were relentlessly unavailable.

Greatly fortunate to us about twelve hours later he finally was able to call us.

For my brother-in-law he completed his work in a particular node of the Pentagon and walked to another assignment elsewhere. The section he originally worked at was struck by the hijacked aircraft, minutes after he left that area. He reflected how he heard a thunderous noise, blackness, dust and chaos. People shouting and trying to recover. He understandably did not share too many details, but I admire him for enduring such events and continuing on rather undaunted. Part of the reason we waited so long to hear from him was that since the Metro was closed down, he needed to walk several miles home.

Luck and a few minutes saved my brother-in-law.

Simultaneously that day, the husband of my wife’s cousin shared a 9/11 fate.

He is an executive with a re-insurance company, headquartered at the top of Tower Two at the World Trade Center. His eldest son worked as an intern that summer at their office and returned to college that fall. While he would be normally working in the office that day, he instead travelled out of town on company business and missed the attack. In another fortune, a senior executive for the company was late for work on 9/11 and arrived late. His chauffer let him off in front of the tower and awaited him to enter. The executive grabbed the door handle and felt the violent shaking of the building. He returned to his chauffer who drove him out of harm’s way. All of the other employees in the office that day perished.

On our home front, the resulting economic turmoil over the later months required my wife to change professions.

A few weeks after the attacks, as previously scheduled, we travelled to the D.C. area to visit our family. My wife’s parents are interred at Arlington Cemetery, overlooking the Pentagon. We visited their gravesite from which we could see the blackened destruction of the section of the Pentagon of which her brother worked. Some photos from that day:

911-0003

Some of the recently deceased
911-0004

911-0005

911-0006

There were many concurrent funerals and memorial services of 9/11 victims throughout the cemetery. For one of the fallen, we were told a colonel in the USAF (Robert Hymel I would later Learn), a B-52 flew overhead to commemorate his passing. Those Airmen, Soldiers, Sailors and all others are a credit to those who serve us, having made such a painful sacrifice.

911-0007

Let us never forget.

911-0008

By Darren Smith

Photo Credits

Own Work © 2001, Darren Smith
33: flag raising

The views expressed in this posting are the author’s alone and not those of the blog, the host, or other weekend bloggers. As an open forum, weekend bloggers post independently without pre-approval or review. Content and any displays or art are solely their decision and responsibility.

173 thoughts on “My Family And 9/11”

  1. @Teaching Spastics to Dance 1, September 12, 2016 at 6:03 pm
    “Gage has no evidence. He has speculations expressed in what are word salads to laymen but which have been examined by structural engineers and found to be nonsense. None of this is confidential. The working papers they produced and the journal articles are all available.”

    “Collected Articles On Nine Eleven
    “CAONE.org 911CA.org
    “Scientific Research Questioning the Official Conspiracy Theory of Nine Eleven (OCTONE)

    “Collected articles and repeatable experiment-based studies done by qualified scientists,
    including PhD graduates from Harvard, Cambridge, and Cal Tech, 22 papers published in Peer-Reviewed Independent Scientific Journals (PRISJs) including 10 engineering-related journals – over 500 pp pages weighing over 5 pounds.”
    Summary: http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=_9zyAJPfKIw
    Richard Gage AIA presented the CAONE to Professor Noam Chomsky PhD of MIT
    http://www.911ca.org/articles/collected

    1. Squeeky – Do you know WHY you seem to think that fire makes more sense than what happened after Larry “Pull It” Silverstein gave the signal that resulted in the very obvious free-fall if WTC – which only makes sense as a controlled demolition?

      What is your complaint about the evidence which so many people understand is the truth about 9/11? What purpose does it serve to try and denigrate people who are dedicated to finding out the truth that our Government and MSM presstitutes don’t want you to know?

      1. The PhD flatly says that fire did not bring the building down. BUT, he is not sure what did bring it down. There will be more research, which if I read it correctly, will not be done before roughly March 2017. If someone had asked me if I thought fire brought it down, I would have said, “no.” I would still say that. But that certainly does not translate into XY and/or Z blew it up, either. It might have been a shock wave from the other two buildings falling which buckled something.

        I am happy with things being in a quantum state until more research is done. That is how most things I believe exist, anyway. Where I always have an ability to change my mind.

        Squeeky Fromm
        GirlReporter

        1. Okay. I’d be curious about how much more research you feel is necessary before you accept what most objective researchers say – namely, that WTC 7, which actually DID collapse = did so as the result of a controlled demolition. Have you seen any video of the event? Are you familiar with who Larry Silverstein is- and his role in the ENTIRE 9/11 event? Hint: Larry’s a player, and like some other players, Larry made out like a billionaire bandit.

          Do some research or at least reading about 9/11. That way your opinions will at least sound half-way informed.

          1. I’d be curious about how much more research you feel is necessary before you accept what most objective researchers say

            ‘Most’ only in the static inside your head.

        2. He’s actually just running simulations. I think if he’d like to devote his time to an interesting puzzle, that’s fine. His association with Richard Gage, who made up his mind a priori, is imprudent.

  2. Poll results from VT readers:

    VT Readers Poll

    Do you accept official U.S. Government explanation about 9/11?

    NO. I believe 9/11 was an inside job (75%, 534 Votes)
    NO. We’ve been lied to but truth is not clear (21%, 152 Votes)
    YES. I accept official government explanation (3%, 24 Votes)
    Total Voters: 710

    http://www.veteranstoday.com

    1. Well, a poll of 710 Vermonters. I’m convinced. And yet you won’t believe what your eyes show right in front of you. This is why truthers are idiots.

        1. Nope, just a Mechanical Engineer who understands strength of materials and doesn’t make up fairy tails to sound important.

    2. Betwixt and between calling me ignorant, you might just take a course to learn how to construct a valid sampling frame.

  3. This article goes a long way in helping us understand why so many reasonably intelligent people still don’t know they’ve been deceived about so many important events:

    US Public Don’t Care If Politicians Lie

    snippet:

    “All of the U.S. ‘news’ media hid all of this from the U.S. public, but Americans nonetheless trust U.S. ‘news’ media enough to subscribe to them. And Republicans still trust George W. Bush, and Democrats still trust Barack Obama — despite their proven lies (which U.S. ‘news’ media hide and have hidden: the crucial lies are the ones that the ‘news’ media, of both political Parties, refuse ever to expose; so, the ‘news’ media are locked into continuing their lies about those matters — lies such as the official story about 9/11, which are the government’s lies that the nation’s press still accepts as being truths).”

    http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/09/12/us-public-dont-care-if-politicians-lie.html

      1. Gage has no evidence. He has speculations expressed in what are word salads to laymen but which have been examined by structural engineers and found to be nonsense. None of this is confidential. The working papers they produced and the journal articles are all available.

        For the layman, the whole scenario sounds preposterous. Larry Silverstein bids for a 99 year lease on the complex, then arranges to have it destroyed. The place is laced with explosives and no one notices while that’s ongoing and no one recruited for this activity ever breathes a word about it.

        1. Spastic –

          Your comments sound more and more like the work of a professional. Where else does your wisdom appear? JREFer?

          Do you agree with Dr. Stein that the U.S. should not fund Israel – or SaudiBush Arabia?

          1. You mean Larry Silverstein, a 70 year old real estate developer with decades of work behind him, bid on a massive cache of office space in order to wreck it and then cash in on the insurance proceeds and kill several thousand people in the process? And he did this during a window of time when the buildings were insured by a short term binder’s contract? And he did this without being sure if his handy work would be discovered? And he did this when the language of the insurance contract did not make clear whether the happenings that day amounted to one event or two? And his supersecret crew just happened to complete its work on the weekend before a pair of jet airliners ploughed into his buildings?

            Let me guess, Silverstein and the hijackers were working for the Mossad, right? Or the jets were a media hoax and the buildings were actually hit by Cessnas (yep, Morgan Reynolds offered that bit of wisdom)?

    1. Patriot – your 2600 people are giving opinions, not evidence. Big difference. There are more than 2600 who disagree.

      1. Paul – does it give you comfort to know that there are MILLIONS just as uninformed as you?

        1. Bill, you’re not informed. You are pleased to cultivate the illusion that you’re better informed by imbibing nonsense that ordinary people recognize as nonsense and fancying you have special knowledge.

        2. bill mcwilliams – I am blissfully unaware of the workings of the internal combustion engine. Millions, nay trillions join me in ignorance. 🙂

    2. Patriot,
      Calling people “Zionist liars” is detrimental to your argument. People will conclude that your point is without merit since it is attached to ridiculous, baseless name-calling. Why should they listen to someone ranting and raving and being rude?

  4. I am thinking of the aftermath the continuing cost and all that we lost. One way of looking at war is ‘don’t fight if you don’t intend to win.’ Another is ‘if you have to give up all that you value was it a win or a loss?’ Fifteen years ago someone made the decision to hold the entire citizen population responsible for much of the 9/11 losses. Sentenced to the TSA Nazi’s at the airports. To what end? I feel so safe I won’t fly anymore given their proven ineffectiveness.

    A short time after we were given the Patriot Act and it’s adjuncts. One is No Civil Rights of the Constitution within 100 miles of the border or any coastline. Still in effect. To what end? Another is undefined unexplained rules on arrest or apprehension. No probable cause needed, no warrant, no judges signature, and worse no civil rights no trials and extendable sentences all that’s needed and it’s written this way is ‘suspicion of’ terrorism and this year ‘suspicion of supporting terrorism.’ Supposedly for middle east Jihadists but nowhere is the extent of that set of new laws defined to exclude US Citizens. Nor is terrorism defined.

    You haven’t noticed? No. But they can be used when ‘mere suspicion’ exists. Better hope your name is Hillary Clinton. And if you are on her version of Nixon’s Enemies List better just shut up when it comes to even thinking ‘not nice’ if that one gets in.

    But the important part is when we all go on trial for 911? Think not What I just said was renewed with the add with 85 Senators voting in favor and the ‘suspicion of’ rule extended and expanded.

    So tell me what was it all about? When you lose the most cherished core values and things like internal passports are being talked about seriously.. What was it all about?

    On a bright note the 44 billion that was paid to IRAN? Even counting interest with the decline in the value of the US Dollar they got just about what it was worth back when that accouont was frozen.

    Maybe Turley can make some sense of it but as a 24 year veteran all in the combat arms I fail to find giving away the Bill of Rights and Civil Rights to be acceptable unless unless the intent was to lose the war on terror or replace one kind of terrorist for another.

    Ask your candidate Senator Or Representative how they voted on the Dec 31st 8:30PM passage of the annual spending bill. Ask them about the fascist pork buried within. It’s there when they need it. That’s the scary part.

    1. There was no controlled demolition, except in the imaginations of people with too much time on their hands.

        1. Bil, everyone’s ignorant of most things. You read crap and convince yourself you’ve learned something. That’s your delusion, not anyone else’s.

          1. Not even the Shills here are all ignorant. Most likely, just the volunteer ones. Did Randi send you here – or is shilling your profession?

            1. I have no use for James Randi because he has a habit of harassing people who are minding their own business. (e.g. recruiting a pair of youths to ruin psychology experiments at Stanford Research Institute to damage the reputation of the researchers – why he was not prosecuted for that, I do not know).

                1. No. Randi recruited a pair of adolescents to present themselves as research subjects at SRI to psychologists attempting to verify reported parapsychological phenomena. The year was 1978 or 1979. The adolescents under Randi’s instruction burglarized the laboratory at night to gather information and place devices to defeat safeguards the researchers in question had put in place to attempt to measure validly parapsychological phenomena. Randi was not concerned with the validity of their work. He just wanted to embarrass them. Because he’s scum.

  5. randyjet – oh my God, to be so close to those doomed people. That’s like having Death brush past your shoulder. Cannot imagine the grief of flying over the still smoking wreckage of a massive terrorist attack. You guys were lucky that day. Stay safe in the air.

  6. Al Franken was joking… He is a comedian, after all, who wrote his book satirizing Fox News and Republicans, whom as a Liberal he assumes are all racist/bigots/etc. He also wrote in his book that he watched the towers collapse from Minneapolis, where he was visiting his Mom. He never had an office at the WTC.

    It was satire that, embarrassingly, some people didn’t understand. A comedian getting a call from a Koch Brother not to go into his WTC office, which he didn’t have, when he was actually visiting his mother in another state, was a clue.

    Geez. Middle Eastern terrorists plow planes into two buildings, Al Qaeda loudly takes credit for it, the entire plot was uncovered including their emphasis on learning how to take off over landing…and anti-semites still blame “ze Jews.”

  7. I was an airline captain at the time jumpseating home to IAH from BOS on that day. We took off just behind the aircraft that was hijacked. I was seated in back in a window seat getting some sleep, and the FA got me awake and asked me to follow her to the back since I was in uniform and obviously a pilot. I thought I was in trouble for snoring too loudly. Then she told me that a plane had crashed into a WTC tower and that this airplane was on alert. I initially thought that it was a commuter plane, so I was not too concerned. Then the captain came on the PA and announced we were landing at GSO instead. I had to lie to my seatmates since the captain did not say why we were diverting. So while I knew the real reason, I had to come up with an excuse to explain why I had been called out. I simply said it was an Air Traffic Control radar outage that was the problem. Once we were on the ground, the captain told us about the WTC center and said a second plane had hit the other WTC tower. I ran to the car rental counter and asked for all those who wanted a ride back to Houston. I drove for nearly 16 hrs so pumped with adrenaline that I had no problem staying awake.

    Then once we started flying again, I flew one of the first flights back into LGA right after 9/11. It was a clear beautiful day, just as 9/11 had been and we were flying up the Hudson in the pattern for RW 22. That brought us directly alongside over the still burning WTC site and the smoke was still blowing past the George Washington Bridge. My F/O was trying to decide if he should join the USAF, and I was doing everything I could do to persuade him to do it. As we passed abreast the WTC, he took some photos, and I told him to make sure he got a good look since it would give him motivation to kill the SOBs if he did join. My regret is that I was too old to go back into the USAF since I would have done it in a minute.

    As a humorous incident was that I saw a fellow pilot once I was on the ground at LGA, and I told him, Well, we can’t complain about delays at LGA any more since we were one of the few planes operating there. I landed, went right to the gate, took off again, NO delay. So be careful about what you wish for, you might just get what you wish. I had all of ONE pax on board that first flight into LGA that day.

  8. Israelis forewarned of 9/11 attacks – ODIGO INSTANT MESSAGES
    (well-known Israeli instant messaging application)
    Many Israelis maybe thousands, who worked in the WTC, were evidently forewarned of the attacks hours before they occurred through an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. This is very clear evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks
    http://www.haaretz.com/odigo-says-workers-were-warned-of-attack-1.70579

  9. October 15, 2015
    Jewish Senator Al Franken Admits Being Warned About 9-11 Beforehand
    by Chris Bollyn
    http://buenavistamall.com/AlFranken2.jpg
    “TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH, I GOT THE JEW CALL.”
    In his book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, Sen. Al Franken admits to having been warned not to go to work at the World Trade Center on 9-11. Why have the government and “free press” in the United States not investigated this report? Senator Al Franken admits in his book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (2003), that he received a call from the former mayor of New York, Ed Koch, warning him not to go to his office in the World Trade Center on 9-11, using the Hebrew calendar as a reference for the date, which was September 11, 2001.
    Franken refers to this warning call as the “Jew call.”
    “Al”, he told me, “don’t go to work on the twenty-third day of Elul.” Al Franken may have been a comedian who went to Washington, but this is not funny. Being forewarned about 9-11 is a criminal matter. Calls to Sen. Al Franken’s office in Washington at (202) 224-5641, were not answered, although they were made during working hours. Furthermore, Franken’s press secretary, Michael Dale Stein at (202) 224-4645, did not answer either his office phone or his mobile phone during business hours. Stein’s mobile phone said the mail box was empty so messages could not even be left. This is representative democracy?
    The following text from Franken’s book is clear: he was warned in advance by former NYC Mayor Ed Koch, a fellow Jew;
    http://buenavistamall.com/Franken_on_911_Warning.jpg

  10. Osama Bin Laden claimed credit for it. The terrorists were traced to Al Qaeda. Detailed plans of their murderous plot were uncovered.

    What? You think Middle Eastern terrorists are too stupid to figure out they can plow plans loaded with jet fuel into buildings? They do it all the time with cars. Or do people actually believe that Bin Laden was working for Israel? That Bush was a homicidal maniac working with Bin Ladin willing to kill thousands of Americans because he wants to go to war and kill thousands more?

    I won’t change anyone’s mind who’s anti-semitic or deep into the weeds of conspiracy theories or unreasoning political hatred. But for anyone who just wondered why the towers fell the way they did, take a look at the engineering analysis I posted previously. It will hopefully answer any lingering questions.

    Why do tribute posts about 9/11 inevitably devolve like this?

    1. You certainly won’t change anyone’s mind who has studied the evidence – which makes it plain as day that the Official version can’t possibly be true.

      The Twin towers didn’t collapse. They were blown to kingdom come, most likely with small nuclear explosives that turned them into dust.

      No planes crashed anywhere on 9/11. Two of the airliners said to have been involved, remained operational until 2005.

      You don’t have to be a radical Zionist to know all of this – just someone with a working brain and an interest in truth.

      Why do people who know they are promoting a false story about 9/11 inevitably pretend otherwise?

      1. You certainly won’t change anyone’s mind who has studied the evidence – which makes it plain as day that the Official version can’t possibly be true.

        You haven’t studied any evidence, Bill. You’ve engaged in an onanistic exercise of reading literature by people with fertile imaginations who feed your emotional disorders.

        1. I’ve forgotten more of the evidence than you will likely ever know – given your comfortably numb know nothing but MSM-fed propaganda stance

          1. I’ve forgotten more of the evidence than you will likely ever know

            Courtesy Uncle Fetzer and Paul Craig Roberts.

    2. Karen,

      There is also an interesting presence of thermite. I say interesting only in the engineering sense since the event is so horrific. Before you see the buildings actually collapse, you can see random little explosions of what is believed to be little thermite events. Of coarse the wack jobs believe that they were somehow pre planned which would be amazing that the planters put them in the exact spot where the planes hit and no building demo co. would ever put them that high anyway.The more logical reason for these events is the newly introduced aluminum airplane melting and reacting with the now uncovered iron oxide of the beams. There is one video where you can actually see the liquid aluminum run out the building. I have very low tolerance for idiot truthers.

      Speaking of idiots, we just had a recent college graduate leave here who didn’t believe we went to the moon. I engaged with him about it and he could not back up anything. In fact, I knew more about what the hoax claims were than he did.

    1. “Wherever a man commits a crime, God finds a witness. Every secret crime has its reporter.”
      ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

      9/11 Finding The Truth by Andrew Johnson – Audiobook

      https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvaxr0OSBw2DtOWulcA96d7sG2rsNyOgb

      THE DIRECTED ENERGY COVER-UP TEAM

      https://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/50694/images/Richard-DavidG-StevenJ.jpg

      Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals…etc.

      Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives*), telling his audience that “Judy Woods (Wood) says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

      At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”

      In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

      Early on, Dr. Steven Jones created a website he called “The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies” or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a “peer-reviewed journal” but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood’s work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley**) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting “ray beams from outer space.” This convinced his readers that “Judy Woods” must be talking about “ray beams from outer space” and that “such nonsense has been refuted.” Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood’s work does not refute Dr. Wood’s work — yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood’s work has been refuted.

      Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or “outer space”? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that “Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust”. But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

      The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood’s book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that “she hasn’t identified the weapon that was used so she’s got nothing.” To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

      The sub-title of the book, “Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It’s a silver lining in the dark cloud… while also trying to stimulate thought about “what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live”?

      If you are worthy and willing to know the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I have. ♥

      A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE

      https://www.youtube.com/v/XLyNb9BjTmM

      A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART TWO

      https://www.youtube.com/v/5ljqeg9sFgw#t=56

      IRREFUTABLE

      https://youtu.be/r51a2HnAXCQ

      “When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross”.

    1. Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

      1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

      2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

      3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

      4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

      5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

      Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong.
      Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy?

      THE FACTS:

      1. DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.

      2. BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

      3. SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

      4. SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.

      5. DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.

      1. Judy Wood is a mechanical engineer who specializes in the optimal design of dentures. She’s also a certifiable flake, which is likely why Clemson fired her.

        1. “Wherever a man commits a crime, God finds a witness. Every secret crime has its reporter.”
          ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

          9/11 Finding The Truth by Andrew Johnson – Audiobook

          https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvaxr0OSBw2DtOWulcA96d7sG2rsNyOgb

          THE DIRECTED ENERGY COVER-UP TEAM

          https://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/50694/images/Richard-DavidG-StevenJ.jpg

          Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals…etc.

          Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives*), telling his audience that “Judy Woods (Wood) says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

          At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”

          In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

          Early on, Dr. Steven Jones created a website he called “The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies” or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a “peer-reviewed journal” but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood’s work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley**) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting “ray beams from outer space.” This convinced his readers that “Judy Woods” must be talking about “ray beams from outer space” and that “such nonsense has been refuted.” Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood’s work does not refute Dr. Wood’s work — yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood’s work has been refuted.

          Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or “outer space”? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that “Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust”. But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

          The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood’s book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that “she hasn’t identified the weapon that was used so she’s got nothing.” To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

          The sub-title of the book, “Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It’s a silver lining in the dark cloud… while also trying to stimulate thought about “what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live”?

          If you are worthy and willing to know the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I have. ♥

          A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE

          https://www.youtube.com/v/XLyNb9BjTmM

          A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART TWO

          https://www.youtube.com/v/5ljqeg9sFgw#t=56

          IRREFUTABLE

          https://youtu.be/r51a2HnAXCQ

          “When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross”.

Comments are closed.