FBI Director Comey Announces That There Is No Basis For Criminal Charges In Newly Discovered Emails

Jcomey-100Hillary_Clinton_Testimony_to_House_Select_Committee_on_BenghaziJust two days before the election, FBI Director James Comey has announced that the new emails found on Huma Abedin’s computer does not change his earlier conclusion in July that there is no basis to criminally charge Hillary Clinton over her use of a private server, including emails containing classified information.

Comey wrote the letter below to Congress stating “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Sec Clinton.”

Clinton Director of Communications Jennifer Palmieri immediately declared that the scandal was over:
‘We have seen Director Comey’s latest letter to the Hill. We are glad to see that he has found, as we were confident that he would, that he has confirmed the conclusion that he reached in July, and we’re glad that this matter is resolved.”

The quick dismissal of the importance of the emails will likely fuel criticism over Comey’s October 28th letter to Congress on the continuation of the investigation. Most assumed that the new emails had to contain material that would warrant such a departure from the general policy of the Justice Department to avoid actions or statements that might influence an election. According to Comey, however, it only took a few days to determine that the emails were significant enough to warrant a criminal charge.

Here is the letter:

3a20469000000578-3911032-comey_sent_this_letter_announcing_the_fbi_s_finding_after_examin-a-135_1478467947999

220 thoughts on “FBI Director Comey Announces That There Is No Basis For Criminal Charges In Newly Discovered Emails”

  1. If you want another take from someone who read the whole original report, yesterday’s “This American Life” put it in perspective. It’s not the alt-right talking points this blog has been spewing, and it makes a lot of sense:

    https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/601/master-of-her-domain-name

    And how funny is it that they took Trumps twitter account away from him? Seriously? People actually want someone elected who can’t manage a Twitter account?

    1. phillyT – we know from Wikileaks that it takes up to 8 people to write on of Hillary’s tweets. She does not run her own account.

      1. I just love it that you all are so enthralled with the Russian state-sponsored hackers.

        And if by some chance, Hillary does have people monitoring what she writes before she sends it, well that’s just one more piece of evidence that she has the sense to be President and Trump does not.

        1. Go to the https://map.norsecorp.com/#/
          and look if you see Russia trying to attack US interest?

          How can Hillary Clinton claim her personal illegal server wasn’t breached and in the same breath, blame Russia for releasing the hacked emails?

          Wikileaks is a conduit for hackers all over the world. But I recall Hillary and Democrats praising Assange when they were releasing Bradley Manning hacks.

          She has ZERO sense of give a shits for national security. She’s a War monger and any career politician who worth goes from 1million to 1.8 billion is a crooked politician, not an honest one. She’s for sale!

  2. I really have my doubts. 650,000 less the personal emails is still a lot to get through and confirm they are duplicates. Sounds sketchy to me.

    1. They ran all 650,000 through a software filter that is fool proof. If Wikileaks publishes it, it will look something like this:

      If (I get to keep my job) Clinton = innocent;
      else if(I get to live) Clinton = innocent;
      else
      // rats
      Clinton = innocent;

      1. Here’s how the FBI sorted all the 650,000 files

        FINDSTR /C “Incriminating-evidence” ClintonEmail.db > NUL

  3. Here is another way of putting it.

    n = num votes
    if(n< 0) Clinton wins; else Trump looses;
    exit(0);

    1. not that it matters in pseudo code, but: n = num votes -> n = preOrdainedCVotes;

    1. My favorite FB meme going around currently goes as follows:

      “I would trust PeeWee Herman sitting behind me in a movie theatre while out on a date with OJ Simpson drinking at Bill Cosby’s bar with Flint Michigan ice cubes after taking elevator rides with Ray Rice all while Casey Anthony babysits for me before I would trust Hillary Clinton as President.”

      I think that about says it all.

      1. it most certainly does.

        I wonder if Donald Trump somehow left the race would Clinton’s protectors among democrats then turn against her and call her out on her lies and corruption?

  4. This is exactly what I predicted would happen.

    Both Comey and the FBI no longer have any credibility so why should we believe what this agency or the Justice Department in general says.

    This is entirely the result of the investigation, that is those who held the strings, intended to protect the Clintons regardless of whatever evidence was uncovered. If you are the Clintons, their lackeys, or those who contribute money and influence, you can join happy circus of those who are not only above the law, but are completely exempt from it. Ordinary Americans? You get investigated by the FBI, you’re done. They will go out of their way to put you in jail. Be part of the political class? Just have another bottle of fine spirits from the tower and let the lawyers handle it while you trample the little people.

    Guess what Clinton Democrats? Your rage against the “1%’er” machine is now irrelevant, because if she is elected you will be run over by a freight train of Hillary Clinton’s 1% Lolita Express Company–fueled by the coals of your blind support. The 19th century Robber Barons are resurrected and they are the Clintons, Lloyd Blankfein, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, and all the others you hate. Your professed political goals will be gone. She only professes to care about what you want when it serves its purpose of gaining your vote. And she does regard the little people who vote for her as Useful Idiots. What has she actually done in the last several years that benefited you at her expense? She says she will reign in Wall Street, then tells the banksters the exact opposite in various Secret Squirrel speeches they paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars for each one of many. Yeah, she cares about the poor alright.

    You’ve railroaded yourselves. You talk about wanting a government that is transparent and benevolent. You will have NONE of that with Clinton II. Absolutely None! Yet still, you will continue to support her while she shafts you and everyone else.

    I remember during the Bill Clinton impeachment scandal when many declared that Bill Clinton lied and the response later from the opposition of George W. Bush was the chant “When Bush Lied, People Died.” Now, we’ve come full circle. Everyone knows Hillary is a liar, even her supporters, but this time its “When Hillary Lied, none of the Democrats cared. And yes, people died.”

    Because we’ve all heard her famous chant regarding attacking Libya when it was no threat to the US, upheaving their society, bringing in terrorists, killing tens of thousands, and her response was “We came, we saw, he died.” followed by a vengeful and victoriously nefarious cackle of laughter.

    This is what the DNC gave to America.

    1. ““When Hillary Lied, none of the Democrats cared. And yes, people died.” Spot on Darren! A Hilbot friend of mine actually told me “I don’t are how many people she’s killed” – at least she was honest =)

  5. Meets Tanden is having a Twitter war with Wikileaks and The Rapture right now. Wow, This is so Hillary Clinton personified.

  6. Most of the emails were dups. There is software that can very quickly determine if the email is a dup. Get up to speed people. Trump’s surrogates have already deleted their tweets that exposed their ignorance of how the review was done. Breaking down the number of seconds vs the number of emails is a fool’s mission. Don’t take that path. You’ll only look the fool.

    1. Good point. As a reward ‘e’ ‘e’ here are your missing letters. dup-licat-e. So sayeth pedantic slang. So the next question is how many duplications are needed in messages going from A to B? i was raised in the days of manual typewriters, carbon paper, and ‘true copies.’ With that much volume it’s no wonder they were hacked, sliced, diced and layed out on the table. They weren’t private people for sure. More like neon billboards.

    2. Oh the fool? How about this.

      What kind of situation do we have here? Email containing sensitive information concerning the United States Department of State ends up on the hard drive of the sexual deviant Anthony Weiner, who is so unfathomably inept at maintaining secrecy or securing private information that he could not even keep images of his own schlong from becoming seen by the entire internet world.

      Is this not an obvious problem?

  7. I have only had time to review some of the emails. I can only say , God help America! The Deep State is all over and under our political environment! Time will come that we will regret not to have demanded an investigation. This reminds me that when the dump polluted water in a clear water way there is not any way to protect all the water. The polluted water makes all the water polluted.

  8. Regardless, the real punishment for HRC is the fact that she is sweating beating Donald Trump to be President of the United States.

    Let’s assume he is a misogynistic, racist, silver spooned, bombastic opportunist.

    She herself says it so perfectly:

  9. Much ado about very little.

    How about discussing the important fact that the carbon dioxide concentration is now over 400 ppm, a state last seen in the mid-Pliocene when the sea level was about 25 meters higher than now.

    Many people are going to be flooded out. Some email servers as well.

  10. Are we to assume that the voluminous amount of information, contained in the 650,000 emails, has been thoroughly analyzed and scrutinized in such short order? An impossibility. For shame, Comey. Liar, liar, pants on fire. Once praised, then maligned, Comey is now, once again, about to be praised and securely placed back in the good graces of his detractors. All will be as it should in his world. He has, simultaneously, lost all credibility with the American people and managed to eternally tarnish the image of the FBI. Like my dad used to say, some people are so crooked, they can’t pee straight. No doubt, Comey’s bathroom floor is one sticky mess.

    1. Can FBI review 650,000 emails in nine days? Absolutely, says Edward Snowden
      http://www.geekwire.com/2016/fbi-650000-emails-edward-snowden/

      GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump and his supporters are questioning whether the FBI could have sifted through 650,000 emails quickly enough to clear his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, just nine days after they were discovered.

      But the FBI and cybersecurity experts say it can be done with database scanning software – and one of those experts is none other than Edward Snowden, the fugitive whistleblower who’s hoping to get a presidential pardon.

      …The New York Times quoted an unnamed law enforcement official as saying that the FBI was able to finish scanning the emails over the weekend. Many of the emails were personal messages or duplicates of messages that had been examined previously, the Times quoted the source as saying.

      Edward Snowden ✔@Snowden
      @jeffjarvis Drop non-responsive To:/CC:/BCC:, hash both sets, then subtract those that match. Old laptops could do it in minutes-to-hours.
      8:19 PM – 6 Nov 2016
      1,137 1,137 Retweets 1,677 1,677 likes

  11. Amazing – 650,000 emails processed in a few days. I think the whole thing was a scam designed to pretend to set HRC up and then exonerate her. If she wins we are f*&cked. The swamp needs to be drained.

    1. I’ll see if I can get the quote right this time. Samuel Clemens AKA Mark Twain. Congress is the nations only true home grown criminal class turned out t be …..Mark Twain — ‘There is no distinctly native American criminal class save Congress.’

      Got that right Mark!

  12. Bye, Bye America. A nation once governed by honorable, God fearing men and women, sometimes war heroes who had the best interest of the nation and its people is no more. We now have a political aristocracy who will look you dead in your face and lie, cheat and deceive for power and money. At what point will the people of America say “No More”?

    1. When they demand that the election system be investigated and discover it was all rigged to show hilLIARy cLIARnton as the winner, just like the DNC was, and then declare Trump elected. Only when a candidate who is not a part of the standing political system is elected can America be great again. Otherwise, it will continue its descent into corruption. They may as well make John Gotti the president.

  13. So that just leaves the Clinton Foundation Investigation being conducted by the IRS. Of all the parts of government to be rooting for I never thought it would be the one most disliked.

    On the bright side even if elected by popular vote she or he are not yet President Elect until the Electoral College has had their turn that being the only vote that is legal. The best part is that no State law insofar as winner take all,some, none or indifferent has any legal bearing on their deliberations. The worst part is they will all be Clinton flunkies.

    But there remains time for the IRS to do it’s investigation and in the meantime the Electoral College could be thinking of who else. The Runner Up or the Veep? Were I Trump and behind or even Clinton and behind I would await the pleasure of the real voters who can name pretty much anyone they want ….or throw it to the Congress.

    Those two steps being the only way left to deny both candidates the winning majority.

    How say you the educated, astute and literate?

    Speaking from my military background I would reject Clinton and ask for a real Commander-In-Chief. Being without one for eight years is quite enough.

    No More Cannon Fodder.

  14. Yeah, because there was a lack of intent to be negligent. Because negligence requires a mens rea if you’re a member of the Democratic Party Establishment. And your lawyer, who is under investigation herself, can represent you, and others, sooo that everybody can keep their story straight, if you are a member of the Democratic Party Establishment.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

Comments are closed.