D.C. Council Member: Jewish Bankers Cause Snow Storms

Trayon_WhiteI previously criticized the city council for putting up a statute in front of city hall honoring Marion Barry, the scandal-plagued felon and former mayor.  Now Barry’s replacement at the Eighth Ward is filling the news vacuum with a controversy of his own: stating in a video that snow is a Jewish conspiracy by wealthy bankers.  Democrat Trayon White warned that the Rothschilds were manipulating the weather to cash in on the disasters.  The implications are staggering as you connect the dots with White from the Jewish conspiracy behind the movie “White Christmas” to that Rothschild agent Santa Claus.

White’s comments appeared on Facebook where he is shown saying:

View image on Twitter

This might help, Mr. White, but please note that “Winter” is neither Jewish nor a Jewish agent:

 

111 thoughts on “D.C. Council Member: Jewish Bankers Cause Snow Storms”

  1. Well, here is a good story for Professor Turley to do an article on!

    A man who taught his girlfriend’s “cute, wee” pet pug to do Nazi salutes has been found guilty of a race hate crime.

    Mark Meechan, 29, who filmed the dog, named Buddha, responding to statements such as “Sieg Heil” and “gas the Jews”, will be sentenced later today.

    Derek O’Carroll found him guilty of communicating a video which was “grossly offensive” because it was anti-Semitic and aggravated by religious prejudice.

    Meechan, of Lanarkshire, Scotland, was arrested for allegedly committing a hate crime by uploading the ‘M8 Yer Dugs a Nazi’ video in April last year.

    https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article11163226.ece/ALTERNATES/s810/SWNS_NAZI_DOG_15.jpg

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-convicted-dog-nazi-salute-12220187

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

  2. @ swarthmoremom, March 19, 2018 at 1:10 PM
    “@JoyceWhiteVance
    “Putin blames ‘the Jews’ for Russia’s election interference in the US. Why do I feel like we’ve been here before? And where is the condemnation from Trump?”

    Here’s what Putin is actually quoted as saying, rather than the egregiously dishonest assertion that he “blames the Jews for Russia’s election interference in the US.”

    “Maybe they [the alleged election meddlers] are not even Russians but Ukrainians, Tatars or Jews, but with Russian citizenship, which should also be checked; maybe they have dual citizenship or a green card; maybe the U.S. paid them for this. How can you know that? I do not know either,” he said.

    Moreover,

    “In a June 2017 interview with the network, Putin had compared accusations that Russia interfered in the election to anti-Semitism. ‘It’s like anti-Semitism,’ he said, comparing Russia’s critics to people who would say things like ‘the Jews are to blame.’ ”
    http://www.newsweek.com/putin-said-jews-russian-citizenship-may-be-behind-us-election-meddling-839629

  3. @Karen S, March 19, 2018 at 12:09 PM
    “As well, why do they [so many Jewish people] support a party who has thrown itself behind BDS and is pro-Palestinian? It’s never made any sense to me.”

    Really?

    Here’s an opportunity for such support to make sense to you. Watch this talk by Miko Peled, the son of Israeli General Matti Peled and grandson of Dr. Avrahan Katsnelson, signatory of the Israeli Declaration of Independence:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4ZfnpN4Dfc

    Listen also to these two former Israeli Defense Forces members in the growing organization “Breaking the Silence,” former IDF members who oppose the Occupation.

    1. The Jewish people who support the Republican Party are motivated by short-term self-interest. They are deliberately blind to the warning in, who Bannon’s base and allies are. Currently the rich, who are part of the religious majority, curry favor with the Jews and use them to advance oligarchy. The power brokers trot out the obligatory praise of historical figures who fought against the Nazi’s. But in Virginia, when a young woman was killed by a Neo-Nazi, the GOP lined up with her murderer. Once the richest 0.1% consolidate power, the wealth of the Jewish businessmen will be too attractive for them not to covet and legally take. If the Jews are lucky, they will be treated by the GOP no worse than the Republicans treat other minorities.

    2. Thanks, Ken. I’ll check them out at the library. I’m limited on bandwidth.

      1. @Karen S, March 20, 2018 at 12:35 AM
        “Thanks, Ken. I’ll check them [the two videos] out at the library. I’m limited on bandwidth.”

        You’re more than welcome. I hope you’ll do so as soon as possible and let us know what you then think. As one of the former IDF members says, the mission of “Breaking the Silence” is to make US supporters of the Israeli government aware of the criminal behavior they are enabling with that support.

    3. Evangelicals had to pivot quickly to embrace Judaism in order to form a coalition to elect Trump.
      Jews should assume the position is built on quick sand. The evangelicals abandoned their list of “morals’ to elect the much-divorced, womanizing, fiscally reckless, lying Trump. Once, they did that, it was proof positive that they are mere schemers.

  4. OK, sooo let’s play a game! Let’s pretend that the Democrats have prevailed in neutering the First Amendment to where it no longer protects speech that hurts people’s feelings. Like in Great Britain, and Europe. Now, such speech is CRIMINAL!

    Sooo, Yiddy Yidzkovitch, a Jew, files a complaint with the D.C. Police Department, who doesn’t want to pursue the charge. But, since the International Jewish Banking Cabal, The Mossad, and The Old Fartz of Zion Social Club control the Federal Government, the police soon knuckle under and arrest Trayvon White for his speech.

    Now, no lawyer wants to touch Trayvon, lest the Jews foreclose on their student loans, So, YOU are appointed by the Court to defend Trayvon! How do you do it??? By way of background, here are some of the English Statutes:

    In England and Wales the Public Order Act 1986 prohibits, by its Part 3, expressions of racial hatred, which is defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group’s colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins. Section 18 of the Act says:

    A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if—

    (a) he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or

    (b) having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.

    Offences under Part 3 carry a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment or a fine or both.[6]

    The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress. Section 4A states, in part:

    (1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he—

    (a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

    (b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

    thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.


    (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or to both.[7]

    The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 amended the Public Order Act 1986 by adding Part 3A. That Part says, “A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.” The Part protects freedom of expression by stating in Section 29J:

    Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_the_United_Kingdom

    Here is my take, in closing arguments:

    Ladies and Gentlemen, and Lady/Gentlemen and Gentlemen/Ladies and all Non-CIS Gender Individuals, and those of no Gender Whatsoever, or of Fluid Gender, and Furries and Kinks of the Jury . . . what you have to decide today is the difference between literal truth and cultural truth.

    While we realize that the very notion that Jews control the weather is both scientifically unsound, and potentially personally hurtful to Jews in a literal sense, both as a race, and as a religion, what I ask, is does not the very religion of the Jews teach that they are the chosen people of God, and that God will hear their prayers and pleas above all others? Let me refer you to:

    2 Samuel 7:23: And what one nation in the earth is like thy people, even like Israel, whom God went to redeem for a people to himself, and to make him a name, and to do for you great things and terrible, for thy land, before thy people, which thou redeemedst to thee from Egypt, from the nations and their gods?

    And do not the Jews believe as a part of their religion that God controls the weather??? Let me share with you the Biblical beliefs of the Jews:

    Leviticus 26:2–4 Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary: I am the LORD. If ye walk in my statutes, and keep my commandments, and do them; Then I will give you rain in due season, and the land shall yield her increase, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit.

    Job 37:9–14 Out of the south cometh the whirlwind: And cold out of the north. By the breath of God frost is given: And the breadth of the waters is straitened. Also by watering he wearieth the thick cloud: He scattereth his bright cloud: And it is turned round about by his counsels: That they may do whatsoever he commandeth them Upon the face of the world in the earth. He causeth it to come, whether for correction, Or for his land, or for mercy. Hearken unto this, O Job: Stand still, and consider the wondrous works of God.

    Jeremiah 10:12–13 He hath made the earth by his power, He hath established the world by his wisdom, And hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion. When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, And he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; He maketh lightnings with rain, And bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures.

    Nahum 1:3 The LORD is slow to anger, and great in power, And will not at all acquit the wicked: The LORD hath his way in the whirlwind and in the storm, And the clouds are the dust of his feet.

    No, what Trayvon White did was not insult Jews, or their religion, or their power! No, verily I say unto you, Trayvon White affirmed it! In the cultural sense, not the literal sense. And if the cultural sense fits, you must acquit!

    The thing is, we should all probably be thinking about stuff like this, because the Democrats are bound and determined to gut the First Amendment.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

        1. Never a Republicant!

          I would fit well with the Norwegian Conservative Party.
          Along with Bernie Sanders.

          1. Why? Is it a religious thing with you? I used to be a Democrat, and now I pretty much would not vote for one. The change doesn’t hurt, and you don’t change into a pumpkin or anything at midnight.

            Squeeky Fromm
            Girl Reporter

              1. David Benson,
                That is unfair. Evil comes in all stripes. Most Republicans consider Democrats wrong, not evil.

                1. Prairie Rose – as an Independent, I consider all Democrats as evil, some less evil than others. I also consider all Republicans evil, except RINOs who rate the same contempt I have for Maxine Waters.

                  1. Paul, I, too, am an Independent am aggravated by most of the foks on the Hill.

                    1. Good grief. Ignore the errors in my post. I can barely see what I’ve typed since my screen is cracked and the box is a little sliver.

              2. DAVID B:

                Squeeky evil? No she’s merely discerning with high standards (for these days) which scares a lot of people who don’t measure up. Then, of course, they lash out and render themselves … well, you know … temporarily evil.

              3. evil See, just like I said, it is a religious thing for you. Being a Democrat is like being a Godly Person is to a Christian, or being a Good Muslim is to a Muslim. Being a Democrat fulfills that religious void left when Christianity became sort of passe, and sort of the last resort of Bitter Clingers.

                I have long said this, that Democrats are Democrats for the same reasons that Bozmo T. Scruggs, of Bumfuk, West Virginia, is a part time preacher who dances around with rattlesnakes and hollers in Tongues.

                The problem is, that Democrats get lost in all their “Holiness” and no longer see the tremendous evil they do in the name of their religion. Like Catholics burning unrepentant Jews, or Muslims blowing up buildings, they have bought into the idea that all they do is just peachy.

                So go the Democrats, who do the equivalent of giving drugs to junkies, and giving booze to winos, when they give welfare benefits to women to produce illegitimate children. Or, when they support the massive killing of babies thru abortion to satisfy the immature needs of their female base who just want to party, drink, and do drugs for a few more years. Democrats have even reinvented Original Sin, an inescapable stain of pure evil, in a new form, White Privilege.

                Just like the old WCTU, Democrats do the equivalent of busting up saloons to rid the world of Demon Rum, when they pick up baseball bats to keep Milo or Ann Coulter or others from speaking. That “old time religion” is just a burnin’ in ’em!

                Sooo, my question is, David, have you been saved??? Can you still be washed in the Blood of Reason, or is it too late for you? Because if you will listen to me, and others here, you can rid yourself of the sin of being a Clueless Evil Democrat.

                Squeeky Fromm
                Girl Reporter

    1. There’s more to fear from an oligarchy’s power than Dems. The party was bankrupt during the last presidential election and had to be bailed out. It’s the reason the Dems turned to the tech tyrants. Facebook has on its board, Peter Thiel (spoke at the Republican convention) who described women voting as an oxymoron, Marc Andreeson who praised colonialism and, Reed Hastings who wants to do away with elected school boards and has succeeded in various communities.
      Free speech, when legislators are owned by the donor class, and the right to bear arms, when the donor class has aerial surveillance and drones, does not a Republic make.

  5. Weather manipulation is a stated goal of the US Airforce who want to “own the weather by 2025”. In fact, a weather modification notice was given in my local newspaper about 2 months ago by the state for purposes of making it rain. Weather modification is real and it is happening across the world to disastrous effects. It is used as a form of warfare.

    While I do not applaud the anti Semetism of this comment, he should not be derided for saying weather is being maipulated for warfare and profit. That is exactly what is happening all around us.

  6. Oh yeah? Well if the grammatically challenged D.C. Council Member is “bizarre”, then why is it a crime under the U.S. Code to:

    “engage, or attempt to engage, in any weather modification activity in the United States unless he submits to the Secretary [of Commerce] such reports with respect thereto, in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may by rule prescribe.”

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/330a

    That’s right, the U.S. Code makes it a crime to modify the weather without notifying the Secretary of Commerce!

    However, Jonathan Turley is a lawyer. Lawyers know about the law. Which means Turley knew about 15 U.S. Code § 330a when he wrote the above entry; and yet he did not disclose it.

    Why?

    I submit that Jonathan Turley’s attempted ridicule of the D.C. Councilman was intended to conceal his contempt for the “cult of Kashrut”.

    Consider the evidence:

    Jonathan Turley loves his dogs.

    Turley’s dogs love bacon and bacon flavored treats

    Followers of Judaism (a.k.a. Jews) adhere to the rules of Kashrut (a.k.a. Kosher)

    Kashrut prohibits pigs and pig products; like bacon.

    Therefore, Turley’s love for his dogs gives him ample motive to wage a misinformation war against “the cult of Kashrut”.

    Furthermore, an unnamed source—who routinely provides the Washington Post & New York Times with such blockbuster headlines as: “Trump Is a Surgically Altered Adolf Hitler from a Parallel Universe; Regardless Of What He Actually Says or Does!”—told this writer that Turley’s motives to wage misinformation war against “the cult of Kashrut” are further inspired by his love of football.

    According to the source, Turley, a lifelong Chicago Bears fan, is convinced that “the cult of Kashrut” has been conspiring for years to end the Bears-Packers rivalry. Turley’s reasoning? Any Bears v Packers game necessitates the mixing of bratwurst-eating Bears fans with cheese-eating Packers fans. Accordingly, since the mixing of meat and dairy is prohibited under Kashrut, “the cult of Kashrut” MUST be conspiring to end the Bears-Packers rivalry.

    We’re through the looking glass people!

    1. Bob, Esq. – thank you for your insightful investigative journalism. You have broken the whole conspiracy wide open. Congressional committees are fighting over who gets oversight rights. Keep the peace, bro.

        1. Bob, Esq. – I am sure Congress will connect all the dots and find all the players. You got the ball rolling.

  7. Oh, what is the big deal here? Can’t we just PRETEND that Jewish bankers cause snow storms??? I mean that is a relatively harmless erroneous belief. Most of White Academia PRETENDS that the afrocentric theory of civilization is right. To wit:

    What is offensive about Afrocentrism is not that its advocates assert such things as that Socrates and Cleopatra were black Africans or that Aristotle stole his ideas from the library at Alexandria when he visited Egypt. What is offensive is not that they claim that the ancient Greeks took everything they are known for from the Egyptians, and that those Egyptians were black Africans. What is offensive is that these claims are put forth as articles of faith. Any challenge to them is seen as racist. What is offensive is that these claims are not based on scholarly research, evidence and argument from evidence. Nor are they based on a sincere desire to discover historical truth. They are based on unsubstantiated opinions of mythmakers and fiction writers. They are based on the possibility they are true. They are based on a desire for them to be true. They are based on a preconceived notion that white scholars have conspired from time immemorial to repress the truth that everything good about Western civilization came out of black Africa. They are based on the desire to give African-American children self-esteem and pride.

    http://skepdic.com/refuge/lefko.html

    We PRETEND that there is nothing wrong with a 77.3% Black illegitimate birth rate, and in fact call it Black Girl Magic! We PRETEND that a black male incarceration rate of less than 5%,magically causes the 77.3 illegitimate birth rate.

    We PRETEND that black youths eschewing education is because of rusty stairwells. We PRETEND massive black crime rates don’t exist, and helpful white people at BART will not show the videos of the crimes on their trains so as not to stereotype what are obviously the black perps.

    We PRETEND that reporting on what blacks do is hate speech, and divisive, and youtube will even remove people like Colin Flaherty’s channel.

    We PRETEND that Poor Old Gentle Giant Mike Brown was gunned down while on his knees begging “Don’t shoot!” We pretend the Black Thug Trayvon Martin was a poor victim of a white guy, and put on hoodies and eat Skittles in solidarity. We even PRETEND George Zimmerman was a criminal for shooting the guy who attacked him and was banging his head into a concrete sidewalk! And then try him for 2nd degree murder! And PRETEND there is a need for the DOJ to investigate him!

    We PRETEND that none of this exists, and even have Black History Month, where we PRETEND that blacks are wonderful, and haven’t destroyed our inner cities and blown up our budgets.

    I could go on, but if we as a society can PRETEND all these things, what is a little “Jewish bankers causing snowstorms” belief in comparison???

    Sooo, yes Trayvon White, it was the Jewish bankers! I am part Jew, sooo I can vouch for it!

    Lordy, I hope he doesn’t find out us Jews are putting stuff in the food to keep black folks’ hair all kinky, so that we can sell them hair weave!

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

    1. You do know that Manifest Destiny was based on the faith that… we’ll say, European descendants, for now, were entitled to the whole country (except Mexico because according to John C. Calhoun, there were “too many Mexicans there.” That was an article of faith.
      American Exceptionalism is based on the belief that God made Americans (more specifically those of European descent) were greater than all other peoples on the earth.
      Most of the rationale for colonization was based on either the religious belief of entitlement or the need to impose a religious belief on heathens who would be better off led by those of European descent, minus of course their oil, or other natural resources.
      That mote you continually see in black people is obscured by that plank in your eye.

      1. Well, aren’t you glad that bold White People took over the whole of what is the United States??? Because Mexicans are not real fond of Black people. If they still owned the West Coast, Arizona, New Mexico, and other parts of the western USA, including Texas, you black folks would not be very welcome there There wouldn’t be no Watts, or Compton, or Oakland.

        Mexico itself is only about 1% black, and if you think I am making this up, maybe you and other blacks should just illegally immigrate there and see what happens. I am betting you start hollering for Whitey to come save you.

        Mexicans here in the United States do not have much respect for Blacks at all from my experiences. And frankly, the opposite is also true.

        Quit biting the hand that feeds you. Or I will contact the Jews and make it snow on you all summer!

        Squeeky Fromm
        Girl Reporter

        1. Then was the religious justification for slavery itself. With all that God has allowed you to have and do in his name. Why do you wallow in hatred?

          1. What religion did the Africans who sold other Africans into slavery adhere to??? I am just curious.

            As far as wallowing, I continue to wonder why you wallow around in America. You could easily move yourself, and your family to a Black run nation like Nigeria. They have buildings and electricity and the Internet. True, you will have to pay some bribes to officials for minor stuff, but why not put your efforts to improving an African country???

            Just think, no Jim Crow, or Institutionalized Racism, or Mass Incarceration that I know of. You could make a nice living, and be a very important person there. If you are on Social Security, I think you can still get it there. They have banks.

            Sooo, if America is sooo bad, why not make the change??? If America becomes bad for me, I will relocate.

            Squeeky Fromm
            Girl Reporter

      2. Manifest Destiny was a Progressive Doctrine.

        Progressives rule by government fiat. They decide what is best for the country, and then impose it by force on everyone…for their own good. Progress! “Tame” the Indian, put him on a reservation where the government will “care” for him, and make the Indian kids speak English only. Don’t like it? Then you are E.V.I.L.

        Eugenics was Progressive, too. “Genetic Hygiene” forced on everyone for their own good.

        That’s also why they supported Nazism and Fascism in the beginning. An all powerful government with few individual rights was, they thought, the recipe for a Utopian, perfect society.

        Nothing’s changed, really. Somehow they have rewritten history to make the National Socialist Party (Nazi) some right wing idea, and they want everyone to forget how they keep abusing power when they get it. But it’s happening again. Progressives are trying to criminalize speech. Going for Big Government while they erode individual rights, especially Constitutional ones. They want you to forget how this experiment has turned out over and over again, in our own country and other societies.

        As long as we keep a limited government and robust individual rights, then the major political parties are just arguing about how best to run the country. However, take away individual rights according to the Progressive agenda, and you get a very dangerous situation, indeed.

        1. I would like to emphasize that robust individual rights protect minorities from abuse by majorities. It is critical that those most subjected to racist or religious persecution have rights as individual people. Once they get lumped into the collective, to be managed by the government, then they will be more vulnerable to abuse. Jim Crow laws existed because the individual rights of minorities were not protected or defended.

          1. Here is a friendly description of the early Progressive movement. This well-meaning doctrine believed in government fiat, because they thought it was a tool of change. How many atrocities have occurred because individuals gave up their rights to a strong government for their own good? Motives don’t matter if the end result is harmful.

            https://www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/teachinger/glossary/progressive-era.cfm

            My concern isn’t with Progressive’s motives. They really do think they are doing good in the world. Rather, I take issue with the constant drive to strengthen the government at the expense of individual rights. We all know how that ends. They also become violent or otherwise aggressive against critics. It’s single party opinions or none at all. In schools, they call this the Avenging Angel Syndrome. That’s where a child starts out believing he is defending victims against bullies, but turns into a terrible tyrant himself.

            1. I don’t know the answer in advance but I’d bet any amount the amount of violence perpetrated by the right overwhelms anything done by the left by a huge margin. Maybe I’m just missing all those left-wing militias, skinheads, and white nationalists.

  8. It’s not like nothing like this ever happened before, in America, in modern times. Imari Baraka (the former Leroi Jones) was honored by the city of Newark, NJ (and his son became mayor) after saying (and not retracting) that the AIDS virus was created by Jewish doctors who injected black babies with it & 911 was an israeli false flag operation. His evidence that Israel was behind 911 was the “fact” that not a single Jew who worked in the World Trade Center went to work that day. Obviously they were all put on alert.

    People have been involuntarily committed to insane asylums for less.

    A Chicago city alderman independently also figured out the AIDS virus was created by Jews to kill black people. It’s a surprisingly common manifestation of mental illness.

    Hatred of Jews is unlike other forms of bigotry.There’s a strong correlation between hatred of Jew and insanity.

    1. Steve Bannon and his band of white nationalist anti Semites are therefore insane according to you

      1. Do you have a reading comprehension problem? The percentage of people like Bannon & his band (bund) who are insane is higher than the percentage of the general popuation.

      2. Bannon’s choice of chums is a problem Jewish Republicans want to ignore.

    2. Hey, I have a copy of his The Dead Lecturer poetry book, written when he was still Leroi Jones! Some people say it couldn’t be beat. But it was*. 🙂

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

      Note. A few people will get this.

      1. Squeeky – I GOT it, but it was mean to say it. I was going to mention it before when they were talking about father and son, however, I figured it was in bad taste.

          1. Squeeky – I was referring to the beating he took from the police with batons. He was never the same after that.

            1. I never heard about that. He seemed to be a pretty screwed up person, and his “poetry”, at least the one book I read, seem to reflect that. I just read the whole wiki entry on him, and he seems to have been a very not-nice person at all.

              Much like Maya Angelou, I do no think his poetry will be read very much 100 years from now.

              Squeeky Fromm
              Girl Reporter

  9. Both his grammar and his critical reasoning are atrocious. This is a perfect example of the poor quality public education in America. A high school graduate should be able to string sentences along better than that. A substandard education turns out people ill-prepared to govern or hold office, as Mr. White is a prime example. Even my own miserable spelling is better.

    The extremists running politics are always blaming everything on the rick. To be fair, I did not see an express reference to the Jewish faith in his remarks. Therefore, I cannot say with certainty if he was blaming Jews specifically, or just the old standbys of rich white people, for the world’s problems. He may not have even known the Rothschild family is Jewish. He does not come across as well read or informed. Perhaps he is a raving anti-semite in addition to espousing class warfare and possibly racism against whites. I believe that there is enough troubling in this ignorant comment to drill down on what his core beliefs are.

    This is the problem with the constant propaganda blaming the 1%, or whites, or the grinding anti-Semitism of the BDS movement; there are naive, uneducated people out there who actually believe it. And then those people come of age, and get jobs, sometimes even in government, and they bring those prejudices and poor critical thinking with them, to all of our detriment. Is he looking after the black community’s best interests with his prejudice? The white people he represents? No. Such divisive rhetoric makes no one’s life better.

    1. Excuse me, auto correct. Leave Rick alone. The extremists on the left blame the rich.

    2. “Both his grammar and his critical reasoning are atrocious. This is a perfect example of the poor quality public education in America. A high school graduate should be able to string sentences along better than that. A substandard education turns out people ill-prepared to govern or hold office, as Mr. White is a prime example. Even my own miserable spelling is better.”

      I thought for sure you were talking about Donald Trump for a minute. The criticism of Jewish bankers isn’t too far off either with all the talk about “globalists” coming from his administration and creeping into Trump’s, Stephen Miller written speeches as well. I’ll agree with you that this Councilman’s words and beliefs are atrocious, hoping you’ll agree the same views (and spelling/grammar) from the US President deserve scrutiny as well.

      1. I wholeheartedly agree that some of Trump’s Tweets were atrocious. I fully expect him to continue in that vein for the duration.

        I do not conflate “globalists” with Jewish people, however. Globalism subverts the best interests of our own country. Frankly, we don’t really want our government to subordinate our own best interests in favor of other countries. We want to thrive and take care of our own country, and then use our excess to help other countries. For instance, to use an extreme hypothetical example for clarity, we would not want to turn everyone out of work and give all the jobs to Chile. Our Congress is supposed to work for us first and foremost. I also do not believe in the globalist theories of cultural relativity or a borderless world. Musicians from all over the world can make beautiful music together. So can artists. Mathematicians. Ecologists. There are communities who don’t care about politics, and share common ground. However, there is not truly a borderless world. Because, for example, the archeologist among colleagues in Syria faced the reality that ISIS destroyed Palmyra. Because it’s not the US. It’s Syria. And terrorists will gleefully destroy priceless artifacts. The Doctors Without Borders volunteer has to face the grim reality that 5 year old girls in Africa are subjected to Female Genital Mutilation, which makes them more likely to die in childbirth, and which destroys a part of them forever. Some of their patients will be sex slaves. Some of their patients will be in forced marriages to men 40 years older. Because it’s not the US. It’s an African country. We all have our networks of colleagues and friends. And those threads can span the world. But the world still has borders. And those borders are meaningful.

        So, actually, his comments about globalists actually is really far off from White’s rant. Globalism is contrary to the best interests of our country, and is in regard to a political view, not a religious or racist one.

        1. What you equate “globalists” to doesn’t matter. It’s what Trump, Bannon, and Miller intend and how it’s received by most of their base. They mean Jewish bankers!

          1. Enigma,
            I seriously doubt Trump is against “Jewish bankers” considering his son-in-law and daughter (and presumedly his grandkids) are Jewish.

            Do most anti-globalism Democrats mean “Jewish bankers”? I doubt it.

            To big to fail anything (banks,corporations) is dangerous for our country, no matter who is in charge.

Comments are closed.