Dershowitz Claims Obama Asked For An Investigation From FBI At The Behest Of Soros

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz pulled a Giuliani on television this weekend by claiming bombshell evidence in his possession but refusing to disclose it. On Fox News, Dershowitz claimed that he has conclusive proof that Barack Obama “personally asked” the FBI to investigation someone “on behalf of George Soros,” the wealthy liberal donor. However, Dershowitz mysteriously referenced future “litigation” where all of this would be disclosed.

Dershowitz was responding to allegations of political influence exercised by Bill Barr in the Stone case. Ironically, Dershowitz’s defense (like his widely rejected impeachment theory) seemed more damaging than helpful. He argued that plenty of presidents have used the Justice Department for political purposes — hardly a moral high ground. He insisted “There was a lot of White House control of the Justice Department during the Kennedy administration and I don’t think we saw very many liberal professors arguing against that.” However, he then dropped this bombshell:

“I have some information as well about the Obama administration – which will be disclosed in a lawsuit at some point, but I’m not prepared to disclose it now – about how President Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate somebody on behalf of George Soros, who was a close ally of his.”

Dershowitz also harkened back to his impeachment argument with the ‘shoe-on-the-other-foot test” reference:

“We’ve seen this kind of White House influence on the Justice Department virtually in every Justice Department. The difference: This president is much more overt about it, he tweets about it. President Obama whispered to the Justice Department about it. And, I don’t think these 1,000 former Justice Department officials would pass the shoe-on-the-other-foot test. Maybe some of them would, but a good many of them wouldn’t.”

The first assumption for many was that Dershowitz was referencing the Epstein litigation where he has been at the center of cross lawsuits against lawyers and Epstein victims, including women who allege that Dershowitz was one of the men who had sex with underaged girls. These lawsuits continue to expand. However, it could be an entirely separate lawsuit. The only connection that I know of between Soros and the Epstein matter was the appearance of the nephew of Soros in the phonebook of Epstein.

Previously, others like Joe diGenova have said that they have evidence that Soros was involved in the Ukrainian scandals and added “Well, there’s no doubt that George Soros controls a very large part of the career foreign service of the United States State Department. He also controls the activities of FBI agents overseas who work for NOG’s, work with NGO’s. 

What was clear is that the discovery referenced by Dershowitz includes field “302s” which many of us acquire in discovery in criminal cases. When pressed, Dershowitz stated  

“That’s going to come out in a lawsuit in the near future, yeah. That is not unusual. People whisper to presidents all the time; presidents whisper to the Justice Department all the time. It’s very common; it’s wrong, whoever does it — but it’s common, and we shouldn’t think it’s unique to any particular president. I have in my possession the actual 302 [witness report] form which documents this issue and it will at the right time come out, but I’m not free to disclose it now because it’s a case that’s not yet been filed.”

His statement that he is “not free to disclose it” is curious since he is disclosing part of its content, albeit without names other than Soros and Obama. That makes it sound as if it could still be under a court seal. I would think that a court would look with displeasure on a pending or later motion to unseal if the document has been raised in interviews on an unrelated subject.

I am not keen on such opaque references alleging serious improprieties. It sounds a bit too much like Wimpy promising “I’d gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” He is alleging that a Obama asking for an investigation at the behest of a Hungarian billionaire into an individual in the United States. That is pretty serious, if true. However, without some details, it is toying with a matter of great national importance — or yet another defamation lawsuit.

82 thoughts on “Dershowitz Claims Obama Asked For An Investigation From FBI At The Behest Of Soros”

  1. Soros, servant of the Queen, servant of the Venetians who nation hop throughout history, parasite families capturing each nation through spies, diplomacy, ideology, assassination of leaders and patriotic witnesses of their dastardly ways, and through intermarrying royals.
    See Webster Tarpley’s older work on the oligarchs of Europe. They are self-named Black Venetians because its “any means” to their ends. Quite literally. They teach and practice a form of cruelty that comes only from an absence of morality, of conscience.

    They take down nations by destroying their peoples through drugs, through spreading their amoral ways. They hate the American Constitution and its inalienable rights of mankind, aiming to obliterate that idea from the face of the earth.

    Holding mankind precious as the Constitution does, prevents them from doing whatever they will with those they capture. Literally “whatever”. Their amoral and vicious lifestyles. They love enslaving others. Sociopaths and psychopaths are their “norm”.

    So this is no less, a pitch battle for the soul of humankind. And they have a head start.

    Part of the proof of this long lead time, many centuries of planning, preparation, assassination, mayhem…is in the reader’s general non-recognition of who they are. That is a product of their near perfect undercover work through multiple generations of humans and nations.

    This is not just another year in the life of America.

  2. Dershowitz going with the ‘I’d rather owe it to you rather than cheat you out of it’ dodge. Shocking. I’d never suspect it of him. Ha.

    Thank you. Thank you very much.

  3. Poor Bernie, he’s gonna get screwed again. Bloomberg, Clinton, Obama the democrat party establishment are going to steal the nomination from Sanders in a “Brokered” convention. Then they’ll try to steal the general election.

  4. Oh My God! Obama asked a foreigner for help with some Ukrainian connection. Oh My God, Oh My God. That’s impeachable. Did he call him, text him, email him??? That’s impeachable. Oh My God, we need Adam Schiff on the case right now. He’s the expert in these matters you know. Calling Adam Schiff, hello. Please help. Hello.

  5. Dershowitz applying the Fallacy of Imitative Form perhaps. Works for me. He wins they lose.

  6. Did Dershowitz say, “Bombshell evidence?”

    ”Trump is not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

    – Lisa Page to her FBI paramour, Peter Strzok.

    “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

    Peter Strzok to his FBI paramour, Lisa Page.

    Professor Turley, this is beyond the pale.

    Barr is a repeat and continuation of Comey’s political and corrupt, non-prosecution of Hillary, Comey’s acts agaisnt a duly elected president and Comey’s acts against the very Constitution itself.

    Barr is as corrupt as Comey and “company.”

    America is forced to watch as legions of glaring, atrocious and reprehensible criminals walk free.

    The product of this criminal negligence and dereliction is more deplorable than that of the Orenthal James Simpson trial, the JFK assassination, etc.

    The Justice Department has become a rancid and corrupt communist cesspool not dissimilar to the Soviet Commissariat of Security and Secret Police commanded by Lavrentiy Beria himself.

    Mr. Deep Deep State, AG William Barr, presides over Mr. 7th Floor himself, Christopher Wray (with the FBI as a curriculum vitae).

    Barr has proven his fealty to the Deep Deep State and Christopher Wray “…knew everything the FBI was doing;” Wray cannot pretend he didn’t.

    “POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing.”

    – Lisa Page to her paramour, Peter Strzok

    Obama wanted to know everything and Mr. G-Man, Christopher Wray, didn’t?

    “I know nothing!”

    – Sergeant Schultz

    The Obama Coup D’etat in America is the most egregious abuse of power and the most prodigious scandal in American political history.

    The co-conspirators are:

    Bill Taylor, Eric Ciaramella, Rosenstein, Mueller/Team, Andrew Weissmann, Comey,

    Christopher Wray, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Laycock, Kadzic, Yates, Baker, Bruce Ohr,

    Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Kortan, Campbell, Sir Richard Dearlove, Steele, Simpson,

    Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, Stefan “The Walrus” Halper, Azra Turk, Kerry,

    Hillary, Huma, Mills, Brennan, Gina Haspel, Clapper, Lerner, Farkas, Power, Lynch,

    Rice, Jarrett, Holder, Brazile, Sessions (patsy), Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Obama et al.

    1. Obama AND McCain were BOTH ineligible to be President. Neither are Natural Born Citizens. Pelosi conspired with both of them to overthrow our presidency by fraud. See my book “Imposters in the Oval Office” iUniverse Publishing (c)2018. Obama is a usurper,fraud,traitor and spy.

    2. George,

      Regarding politics today: Hell almost no one even gives a damn about the complete Bullsh*t story the govt told us of how & why 911 happened!!!

      Remember that Ahole GW: We have to attack them over there so we don’t have to fight over here… skip ahead a couple of years…… then both the GOP/DNC start flooding us with those islamic nut jobs.

      Golly Shucks, I guess we’z just to stupid to remember?

      If the current Deep State can buy enough time they maybe think their crimes of today at the DOJ/FBI/FED Courts well also soon be forgotten.

  7. Mr t. Have you been under a rock for the last 3 years? Adam S
    Said he had concret evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians. Then Muller or should I say the Wissman report came out Shifty has not produced one thing to prove collusion. All talk and lies. I would guess all you watch is the fake news networks..

    1. Don Jr, Kushner and Manafort met with the Russians after being told it was part of the Russian effort to help the Trump campaign. Does that count as one thing supporting collusion? Lots of other things that came out like that, that Team Trump initially denied.

        1. Perhaps the part that said it couldn’t be proved. Not that it didn’t happen. Facts are okay on occasion.

    2. So what either way? Collusion was never and is not now a crime. Except in the way the left stream media tried to change it without approval of Congress, President and Supreme Court It was a joke, is a joke and will always will be a joke thae Meuller and hs cartel got away without ripping off the taxpayers that long for that much money AND got away with it.

  8. It was on FOX, so you know Trump will call his personal lawyer Barr to open an investigation.

  9. Lawyers for the Times and its reporter Charlie Savage are scheduled to file a legal brief Friday challenging the government’s stance.

    “The Times knows of no basis for withholding the 302 reports under” a FOIA exemption for legally-privileged records, Times lawyer David McCraw said Thursday, previewing the planned brief. “Repeatedly, interview summaries, such as 302 reports, have been released to FOIA requesters. These are factual reports–not deliberative documents–and in this case, factual reports compiled in the course of a high-profile investigation into whether CIA agents tortured and killed detainees in violation of federal law and then destroyed evidence.”
    The above is from an October 31, 2014 POLITICO article. It should answer Natacha’s question about obtaining FBI 302 documents.

    1. ha ha 302s have plenty of legal inferences built into them, they’re not purely factual, nobody thinks that if they know what a 302 is and how it’s prepared

      and if they cover national security matters or pending investigations or whatever other FOIA exception, they’ll withhold them if they feel like it and not much to say about it. Even if the reason is bogus, good luck forcing the matter in court.

      but the reporters will spin it I guess.

      1. Mr. Kurtz,
        However Dershowitz may have obtained it ( if he has it), his claim is that the 302 backs up his allegation about the Obsma- Soros matter.
        Dershowitz is in a “put up or shut up” situation; if he indefinately claims to have the 302 that proves his allegations without producing it, it’ll end up looking like an empty boast.

  10. What does the FBI have to say about this? How did Dershowitz obtain the field 302? Isn’t that a confidential investigation document, that is generally considered privileged? If it is genuine, then someone broke the law: whoever stole it or disclosed it. If it was contained in exhibits subject to an order sealing them, it’s still illegal.

    When mulling over Dershowitz’s credibility, consider this: he admitted being in a room, in Epstein’s mansion, naked, and receiving massages from an underage girl….BUT….he denies anything sexual happened. Then, there’s the Mike Tyson panty liner defense dreamed up by Dershowitz: Tyson couldn’t have raped beauty contestant Desiree Washington because she had used the restroom and removed a soiled panty liner. Nothing says: “I’m ready for sex” like removing a soiled panty liner, according to Dershowitz, who believes himself to be an expert on female menstrual habits. Hey: Dershowitz: here’s a clue: women who consent to sex usually remove their panties, along with any tampons, liners, pads and all. Another clue: women discard menstrual products when they are soiled. When Tyson got convicted of rape, Dershowitz literally went running down the street outside the courthouse, yelling at TV reporters that every moment his client was behind bars was an injustice, so he had to rush to get the appeal started. That entire trial and Dershowitz’s defense theory and behavior has stuck with me because it was so outrageous.

    Dershowitz has no credibility. If he does possess a field 302 document, it’s probably a forgery. But, it did divert the news cycle away from the story about the 2000 former federal prosecutors demanding Barr’s resignation. Sounds like a classic Kellyanne maneuver.

    1. The slanderous Natch is at it again, this time Dersh gets her poison pen

      ” naked, and receiving massages from an underage girl….BUT….he denies anything sexual happened.”

      He actually said he got a massage from a woman not a girl, and he kept his briefs on.
      Ms Giuffre claims she had sex with him, however. Personally, I think she’s lying. But that’s not my case to judge. I observe nobody’s charged Dersh so maybe the prosecutors don’t believe her either, not about that one, whatever else they did find credible in accusations about Epstein. Hmm? Isnt that the most likely and reasonable inference?

      But what’s this got to do with Mike Tyson? Nothing at all. Wow you can see how Natch holds a grudge for decades!

      And the innuendo here is preposterous. I bet 90% of men and women get naked for massages. You crawl under a blanket and they expose the relevant part of the body for the work. That is not unlawful, assuming proper licensing of course, not scandalous, not unethical.

      It’s too bad people are always casting aspersions on massage, it is a healthful activity and many fine workers earn their bread helping people mitigate their aches, pain, depression and anxiety.

      1. OK, Kurtz: I cited the Dershowitz Tyson defense strategy as a shining example of his arrogant lack of judgment, not just on how to defend a client charged with rape, but the absurdity of his theories and his propensity for grandiosity. Desiree Washington was a college student from Rhode Island, in Indianapolis for the Miss Black America Pageant, and very naïve, but Dershowitz trashed her anyway. Giuffre was underage when she was induced into Epstein’s web of abuse.

        If someone wanted a massage for the sake of the benefits of a massage, he would likely go to a legitimate masseur, not Epstein’s NY mansion. I’ve gotten massages, too, by male masseurs, and there was nothing sexual involved.

        1. Rich people hire in massage therapists rather than go out. This is not uncommon. They can command a premium price and some therapists will travel. There’s nothing wrong with that. In itself at least.

          I bet Robert Kraft wishes he would not have gone out to a massage shop. Of course John Travolta called in for a masseur, and then got sued when he groped the poor guy. Travolta settled. And perhaps not just one of these cases, but I can’t remember precisely.

          Personally, I’m not against erotic massage, I think it should be legal, but licensed just as therapeutic massage is, and between consenting adults of course not minors. Most of all, I think even where it is still unlawful, it should not be conflated with actual violent and exploitative pimping and its more complicated cousin, human trafficking.

          The false accusations of human trafficking against run of the mill Asian massage parlors employing perfectly free and willing middle aged women, such as were leveled at the providers who serviced Robert Kraft, which arrests fetched ZERO charges of HT, undermines real incidents of human trafficking and underage exploitation and pimping such as perpetrated by Epstein.

          Now what is difficult to deal with is the likelihood that Epstein was working for one or more intelligence agencies developing very real “kompromat” on all his fancy friends, to whatever degree they could be seduced into wrongdoing. Again this was a really nasty and sordid operation, which was likely being plied at least in part, for the benefit of Mossad and or for all we know also CIA. As opposed to the Russians who are blamed for everything under the sun. again, the real incidents of wrongdoing are often obscured by fake news. Though, I’m sure they– or their contractors– do honeypot operations too.

          Now, Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s father, was certainly involved with Mossad, but was she? Was Epstein? Certainly a lot of people think so and not just the usual “conspiracy theorists”

          All that being said, Epstein was in touch with a lot of people, and they should not all be smeared just because it’s clear that certain ones were involved in illegal activity.

          If a criminal eats lunch with a square citizen, the square does not thereby become a criminal. If a criminal gets his tooth pulled by a dentist, the dentist does not thereby become a criminal, and, not even if the crook pays the bill with ill gotten gain. The dentist may properly take payment and assume the money is clean. The mass media obscures this all the time, unfortunately. And the US DOJ has obscured it too, going back to the beginning of the war on drugs, when a lawyer was in fear of taking a retainer from a client just because of the charges. There’s less of that now, but it still theoretically is a problem. Somehow, the pot dispensary lawyers think they won’t get in trouble over that. But bottom line, don’t paint with too broad a brush folks, it may be you who gets painted tomorrow.

    2. At this point the 2,000 corrected from the socialist definition of multiplying by a thousand would still be onlly 2,000 votes by individuals or even more meaningless 2,000 members of the Collective which means alleged but not proven to exist but in the end would still be a meaningless pursuit of a non crime of interest only to a few illiterates and those uneducated in checking the law before barkinig up a tree at the moon.

  11. He who claims, must prove. I think if he was not at liberty to disclose it prior to filing the relevant case, then he should not have done so. Now that he has mentioned it, he should file the case and reveal the proof.

    He is correct that the Justice Department is not an ivory tower with which no President ever communicates in any way.

  12. “He is alleging that a Obama asking for an investigation at the behest of a Hungarian billionaire into an individual in the United States. That is pretty serious, if true.”

    Soros has been a US citizen since 1961.

      1. Soros might have been born Jewish but he doesn’t think he is. I agree with Soros. He is not Jewish. He is an abberation of what most consider a normal human being.

    1. If Soros told Obama “Hey, Jeffrey Epstein is running a child sex trafficking ring and here are pictures — Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew have been at his mansion regularly – someone should look into it” and then Obama told the Justice Department; that would seem to be appropriate.

    2. I think that is the root of all of this. That guy is no good, does not have our country’s best interests in his dark little heart, which sadly, is still beating.

  13. You can always tell when Trump has been caught doing something really bad because he (and his team, such as Guiliani or Dershowitz or his friends at Fox) will start claiming that Obama was actually the one doing it. Throw in the name “Soros” and it makes it even better. The evidence is always something which they say will come out eventually, but somehow never does.

    1. the new info on the Soros horizon is actually not about Soros. it’s about another billionaire who has spread around GOBS of nonprofit money (like Soros did a couple years ago)…. .

      Bloomberg is literally buying the Dem party out. You will see come super tuesday when he rakes in the delegates. Come back and tell me I was right when it happens.

      Bernie is running a strong campaign but the massive amount of money, wow. Mikey’s making it rain!

      1. Looks like you are projecting; hoping for som dirt on Obama and Soros so you can feel good about supporting a traitorous criminal posing as president.

  14. Well, at least we don’t have to read Breitbart and the National Enquirer today.

    What a hack.

Comments are closed.