Flynn Retweets Call For Trump To Declare Martial Law To Hold New Elections

Retired Gen. Michael Flynn embraced an extreme call this week for President Donald Trump to declare martial law to hold a new presidential election. In a tweet, Flynn appeared to endorse a call from We the People Convention to declare martial law. He added “Freedom never kneels except for God.” As someone who long criticized Flynn’s prosecution as abusive, his association is deeply disappointing. While it does not alter the view of the prosecution, it will alter the view of Flynn to support such a call.

Flynn rightfully demanded review of his charges and his treatment by the court was irregular and improper in my view. The refusal to dismiss his case led to a presidential pardon.

Some of us have encouraged courts to review the voting allegations of the Trump campaign and I have specifically encouraged Democrats to support such scrutiny to help resolve the widespread view of this election as flawed.  I believe the failure to do so was a failure of leadership by Biden. However, dozens of lawsuits have been reviewed by the courts and rejected. This includes rulings by Trump appointees and conservative judges.

Ordinarily, I do not put much stake in retweets, which often occur quickly and without much thought. However, the large headline of the original tweet prominently refers to martial law. It is hard to miss. If he did not read the headline and does not support the call, he should immediately issue a correction.

The call for martial law is an invitation for virtual civil war. It is also a rejection of our judicial system that has continued to function as intended by the Framers. Federal judges have rejected these lawsuits for legal errors and lack of evidentiary foundation. The campaign has appealed many of these rulings and lost.

In a full-page Washington Times ad from We the People Convention, Ohio Tea Party leader Tom Zawistowski draws a comparison between Lincoln trying to save the union in 1863 and the need for Trump to declare martial law to stop “Democrat/Socialist federal officials plotting to finish gutting the U.S. Constitution.”

The reference to Lincoln is bitterly ironic. Lincoln has long been criticized for his unconstitutional action to unilaterally suspend habeas corpus.

Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” That decision rests in Article 1 with Congress, not the President. Moreover, this is not a case of rebellion or invasion. This is a contested election. If a president could unilaterally declare martial law over his own election, it would not be an invitation to tyranny, it would be tyranny itself.

As for Congress, there is no chance that such a declaration would garner the support of both houses, including many Republicans.

The danger is not such Congress would approve such a move, but that such extreme calls are fueling the growing tension in this nation. For a former National Security Adviser to embrace such a call is chilling and reckless.

[Parts of this posting were updated]

295 thoughts on “Flynn Retweets Call For Trump To Declare Martial Law To Hold New Elections”

  1. What is the purpose of continuing to turn up the heat? Is it to get people to really think about how our government and the judicial system is supposed to function? Or is it functioning more along the lines of schoolboys attempting to instigate a fight? The madness of crowds is too easily steered.

  2. Flynn’s pardon is just another instance of the Trump administration making it look like Flynn is guilty of lying to the FBI

    Without the interference from trump the judge may well have dismissed the case with prejudice which would be equivalent to finding Flynn not guilty
    A pardon does not mean Flynn is not guilty

    This is the most recent order of the judge in the case:

    “The government has also filed on the record in this case numerous notices of filing discovery correspondence and Mr. Flynn has generally filed the discovery produced on the record in this case as Exhibits to his supplementary filings. See ECF Nos. 228, 231, 237, 248, 251, 257, 264 . The government has acknowledged that the discovery provided to Mr. Flynn and thereafter filed on the record contained altered FBI records. See Notice of Compliance, ECF No. 259. Accordingly, the government is HEREBY ORDERED to file, by no later than October 26, 2020, a declaration pursuant to penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1746 that the discovery documents provided to Mr. Flynn and filed on the record in this case are true and correct copies. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the government’s declaration shall identify each discovery document by name, date, and author. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the government shall provide transcriptions of all handwritten notes contained in the Exhibits. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 10/23/2020.”

    The judge wants to now look at the evidence (or lack of evidence)

      1. The DOJ turned that in on October 26, as ordered, with 14 attachments
        _________________________________________________
        Yes that is correct but it is extremely out of the ordinary for a judge to order the prosecution to swear, subject to penalties of perjury. that the documents they are presenting are true and correct. It suggests that the court is extremely skeptical that there ever was a legitimate case against Flynn, There is definitely nothing in those documents that suggest the FBI thought there was a case against Flynn.

        There is no doubt in my mind that the judge believes this case is a sham and a fraud.
        But who is responsible for that sham. Is it Flynn? Is it Flynn’s attorneys? Is it the prosecution?
        Or is it all of them?

        1. In the same order you quoted from, Sullivan pointed out that “(1) Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents assigned to review Mr. Strzok’s notes had placed sticky notes on the document with estimated dates, and the sticky notes had not been removed prior to scanning the documents for production purposes (see ECF Nos. 248-2, 248-3); and (2) a sticky note with an estimated date had been placed on the notes of Andrew McCabe, and the sticky note had not been removed prior to scanning the document for production purposes (see ECF No. 248-4). The government stated that the notes of Mr. Strzok and Mr. McCabe were otherwise unaltered, and it provided the unaltered versions of Mr. Strzok’s and Mr. McCabe’s notes. See Exs. to Notice of Compliance, ECF Nos. 259-1, 259-2, 259-3. However, the government did not address the Court’s authentication request despite the government’s acknowledgement that altered FBI records have been produced to Mr. Flynn and filed on the record in this case.”

          It’s no surprise that when the DOJ f’s up and alters the evidence that was passed along to Powell, the judge makes atypical demands that they affirm they haven’t made more mistakes of that kind.

          Your response suggests that you’re ignorant about significant details in the case.

          1. Your response suggests that you’re ignorant about significant details in the case.
            ___________________________________________________________________

            Do you mean this detail that I quoted above:

            “The government has acknowledged that the discovery provided to Mr. Flynn and thereafter filed on the record contained altered FBI records.”

            1. No, I mean the detail that “the government did not address the Court’s authentication request despite the government’s acknowledgement that altered FBI records have been produced to Mr. Flynn and filed on the record in this case” and plenty of other details, like Sullivan having already ruled that Flynn’s false statements were material.

  3. Why does Prof Turley continue to insist that Biden has been elected Prez or some new position of Prez Elect declared by CNN/AP & a handful of other known Commie agent media outfits? Where did they get this new authority from JT?

    I know how much Prof Turleys loves Roger Stone for some reason. I’m sure he wishes to keep up to date with Roger.

    https://79days.news/watch?id=5fc81c02a4eedc5a2e2d1311

  4. President Dumbbell can barf tweets and whine at rallies and pretend to be patriotic all he wants. Same with his empty sycophants, who constantly try to usurp American history for their own warped purposes. But: only until late January 2021: at which point the orange snowflake should hope that Pizza Hut, his former employer, will be hiring again.

    1. But what will they do about the massive criminal cheating by democrats after it is revealed that President Donald J. Trump won a huuuuuuge victory?

      What kind of lunatic country doesn’t consider the vote important enough to require citizens to go to a polling place, be identified and certified and cast a ballot on the spot, on Tuesday, one day, a 24-hour period, required by election law?

      What kind of lunatic country gives its election counting function to foreigners with a corruptible computer using corruptible software from Hugo Chavez’s despotic communist dictatorship in Venezuela?

  5. America is in a condition of hysteria, incoherence, corruption, chaos, anarchy and rebellion.

    President Abraham Lincoln declared martial law, seized power, neutralized the legislative and judicial branches and ruled by executive order and proclamation to “Save the Union.”

    President Donald Trump must now declare martial law, seize power, neutralize the legislative and judicial branches and rule by executive order and proclamation to “Save the Republic.”

    1. An insurrection it’s already in process in Washington and Oregon where vandals and Anika’s are allowed to attack civilians their property and government property then be either arrested or not arrested and in the cases they are immediately released. antifa and BLM have worked the streets like the brown shirts in Berlin in 1936. In many places they have installed voting systems that require literally no proof of identity.

      The Constitutional right to freedom of speech is being suppressed and we see the media Giants who control the Press pairing a Presta to Mere propaganda tools for one party. Whiskey Business people having their business shutdown by Petty tyrants that won’t even obey their own draconian rules. The only real answer to all this is secession,

      1. Fergus…………..Wonderful comment! I totally agree.

        Btw…..If God be Fergus, who can be against us?! 😁

  6. “Durham bad for Biden.”

    – Professor Turley
    _______________

    Durham good for Commie Ho-riss.

    Durham good for Barry Soetoro.

    Durham good for the Deep Deep State.

    Durham good for global communism.

      1. It was a 10 point victory for Biden predicted in Florida?

        This guy is all whacked out. He fights with everyone except windmills.

  7. These people desroyed Flynn’s reputation, none have paid for that. They prosecuted the man for nothing, no one has paid any price. A corrupt kjudge refused to dismiss his case and attempted to prosecute him on his own by proxy, no one will pay, in fact, that corrupt judge won because Trump had to pardon Flynn. Mueller and his team of criminals engineered his prosecution, they will never pay for that. I don’t give two F-words, if Flynn calls for something like this because we are looking at the people that ruined Flynn’s life not paying for their activities but instead are being rewarded for it. Judge Sullivan will remain on the bench. Adam Schiff will continue to lie and the media will reward him.

    Biden will be President and no one will look at his corruption. Susan Rice is walking around as if she is some moral leader yet she will never pay for saying a traitor served with honor and that Benghazi was a spontaneous reaction to a video. So if Flynn has a problem with people that destroyed everything he worked his lifetime for, I can’t say I blame him.

    1. These people desroyed Flynn’s reputation, none have paid for that. They prosecuted the man for nothing, no one has paid any price.

      “these people” to whom you refer are the Trump DOJ.

        1. Comey and McCabe were not involved in the phony charges brought against Flynn.
          Mueller was appointed by the trump administration and Mueller and Trump and Rosenstein had a secret meeting in the oval office the day before Mueller was appointed. What did they talk about?

          The FBI investigated Flynn for 6 mos. and came to the conclusion there was no crime for which Flynn could be charged
          https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/02/16/fbi-michael-flynn-fbi-no-charges-lemon-sot.cnn

          But the FBI was ordered by the Trump administration to turn the investigation of Russia election interference over to Mueller and McCabe (as acting FBI director) was ordered to stay away from the investigation and all related matters.

          1. For jinn, time stopped in February of 2017. He just can cope with the evidence that the FBI and the SCO learned after February. He is blind and deaf to all of the later evidence that contradicts him.

            1. The alleged crime took place in January 2017.
              The only evidence that appeared after January 2017 was the evidence manufactured by Flynn and Mueller and his crew.

              1. You think investigations never obtain new evidence after a crime was committed? LMAO.

                You can call K.T. McFarland’s multiple interviews and the texts and emails from December 2016 “manufactured” evidence, but that doesn’t make it manufactured.

                The problem is with you, not with the evidence.

                1. You can call K.T. McFarland’s multiple interviews and the texts and emails from December 2016 “manufactured” evidence, but that doesn’t make it manufactured.
                  _________________________________________
                  Stop lying, I did not call that manufactured evidence. I called that not evidence of anything illegal.

                  1. It’s evidence that Flynn knowingly made materially false statements to the FBI. That’s illegal.

                    1. McFarland’s statements and the emails and texts show that Flynn’s statements to the FBI agents were false.

                      The DOJ said that those false statements were material, and Sullivan already ruled they were material.

                      Keep up the denial, jinn, it says a lot about you.

                    2. The DOJ said that those false statements were material, and Sullivan already ruled they were material.
                      ________________________________________________________________
                      You are once again misrepresenting the facts of the case.
                      Flynn said the statements were material in the statement of offense
                      The DOJ has never explained why they might be material.

                      Quoting Judge Sullivan from the 2018 sentencing hearing:

                      “Mr. Flynn admitted that his false statements or omissions
                      impeded and had a material impact on the investigation, and when
                      I ask questions of the government, I need to know answers about
                      how he impeded the investigation and what the material impact on
                      the investigation was…
                      These are questions that you would be
                      prepared to answer anyway, such as, you know, how the
                      government’s investigation was impeded? What was the material
                      impact of the criminality? ”

                      The DOJ has not explained why anything Flynn said was material to any matter under investigation by the FBI.
                      The FBI has never explained why anything Flynn said was material to any matter they were investigating.

                      The only evidence against Flynn is evidence Flynn himself provided.

                    3. The DOJ explained more than once why Flynn’s false statements were material to their investigation. for example in section IV of Document 132. Sullivan ruled they were material on 12/16/19.

                      Maybe you’ve never read those documents. Or it could be that you’re dishonest.

      1. They prosecuted him for knowingly making materially false statements to the FBI. That’s not nothing.

        They also could have prosecuted him for false FARA filings and for failure to file required FARA registration in a timely way, but they didn’t, as part of his plea deal. That’s not nothing either. Do you think think it’s good for the NSA to be an unregistered foreign agent?

        1. They prosecuted him for knowingly making materially false statements to the FBI. That’s not nothing.
          __________________________________________________________

          Yes it was nothing.
          There was no reason for Flynn to lie and there was no reason for the FBI to care what answers Flynn gave in reply since they already knew the answers and the answers had no bearing on any criminal matter.
          _________________________________________________________________________
          They also could have prosecuted him for false FARA filings and for failure to file required FARA registration in a timely way
          __________________________________________________________________________

          Actually no they had no case there also.
          The only evidence that supports that claim came from Flynn and his statement of offense.

          There is not evidence Flynn was an unregistered foreign agent. Certainly not when he was NSA.
          The evidence shows Flynn was a properly registered foreign lobbyist before he became NSA

          Flynn’s partner was charged with a FARA violation and acquitted for lack of evidence.

          1. It was a counterintelligence interview, not a criminal interview, and his answers definitely had a bearing on the counterintelligence investigation of why he was lying to Pence.

            Here’s Flynn’s FARA document filed in March of 2017, after he was fired as NSA:
            https://efile.fara.gov/docs/6406-Registration-Statement-20170307-1.pdf
            He later admitted under oath that he was working for “elements within the Turkish government,” so Turkey was the client, not just the principal beneficiary. He lied about this in that document and previously, while working as NSA.

            “The evidence shows Flynn was a properly registered foreign lobbyist before he became NSA”

            Prove it. Provide that evidence.

            1. There is no facts that suggest the FBI asked or cared if Flynn lied to Pence.

              There is evidence against Flynn for a variety of things but it was all supplied by Flynn.
              he has now recanted all that evidence

              1. Are you going to provide evidence for your assertion that “The evidence shows Flynn was a properly registered foreign lobbyist before he became NSA”?

                There are plenty of facts that tell us the FBI cared that Flynn lied to Pence, including testimony under oath to Congress and FBI interviews. Educate yourself about them.

                1. Are you going to provide evidence for your assertion that “The evidence shows Flynn was a properly registered foreign lobbyist before he became NSA”?

                  Its all in the public record. Flynn registered as a foreign lobbyist which is what his lawyers advised him to do because he was lobbying for a foreign company in the Netherlands. Later after he lost his NSA job his lawyers advised him to make the FARA filing. The issue is to what extent the Netherlands company was working on behalf of a foreign govt (Turkey). Flynn’s partner was charged with failing to file as a foreign agent for his involvement with the same company. That case was thrown out for lack of evidence. So by extension it has been established that Flynn was properly registered as a lobbyist in the 3 months in 2016 that he worked for the foreign company.

                  1. I guess that’s as close as you’ll get to admitting that you don’t have any evidence and are simply assuming it “by extension.”

                    1. If you have some evidence that Flynn was in violation of FARA feel free to produce it.
                      The court record shows that Flynn was registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, That was all all that was required by law.

                    2. The evidence was already introduced in the docket. Are you too lazy to read it? Are you not honest enough to admit that you’re simply assuming you’re correct “by extension”?

                    3. The evidence was already introduced in the docket
                      ___________________________________________________

                      The only evidence in the court records is the Statement of Offense sworn to by Flynn
                      Without Flynn’s help the prosecution had no case
                      Without Flynn’s help the prosecution did not have evidence that Flynn made any statement that impeded or interfered in any investigation
                      Without Flynn’s help the prosecution did not have evidence that Flynn made any false statements
                      Without Flynn’s help the prosecution did not have evidence that Flynn was in violation of FARA
                      Without Flynn’s help there would be no basis for any charges, just as the FBI stated back in 2017

                      https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/02/16/fbi-michael-flynn-fbi-no-charges-lemon-sot.cnn

                    4. No matter how many times you lie and say things like “The only evidence in the court records is the Statement of Offense sworn to by Flynn,” it’s still a lie. You clearly haven’t read half the evidence that was filed by the DOJ with the court.

  8. “Some of us have encouraged courts to review the voting allegations of the Trump campaign and I have specifically encouraged Democrats to support such scrutiny to help resolve the widespread view of this election as flawed. ”

    So just exactly what are the courts that have bounced 40 trump lawsuits doing right now, Turley? There have been no Dem complaints about Trump’s right to abuse the legal system with nonsense suits, although the time is drawing near for them to do so.

    Lack of evidence of fraud is the issue, not some manufactured Dem .resistance to the truth.

    On another note, I’m pulling for Trump to endorse his inner baby tantrum and fire Barr for squashing his voter fraud fever dream. Not fair for Spanky to get fired so silly by the will of the American people and not take down the vehicle of a lot of his corruption with him. Trumpy bear should make Barr squeal like Ned Beatty in DELIVERANCE.

    -Elvis Bug

    1. Barr wants to be fired because he thinks it will help restore his respect. Trump should not do it and bring Barr down with him.

      1. Aha…, interesting twist. Make Barr squirm when eating bisquits at the table. I like your thinking.

        – Elvis Bug

  9. Biden failed leadership for sure, but the country failed him first.Voting was flawed for decades, but 2000 woke us up. Or did it? Every state had a chance to develop a secure standard for all voting, including mail-ins, but ignored it. Do you think the state courts will step in now? After SCOTUS declined to fabricate legislation in Bush v. Gore? Trump’s ;lawsuits are just making noise, not dangerous in itself. But if – a BIG IF! – if Trump uses it as the excuse for a martial law re-election – IT’S OVER!! Biden better start doing some kind of leadership NOW – because it looks like Trump i serious that he can prevent an oath-taking Jan. 20.

    1. ha ha voting has always been pizz poor in America. they do it better in some banana republics. it’s pathetic and high time to sort it out

  10. They destroyed the man’s life and continue to do so based upon lies and State-sanctioned corruption. I have not read one case in 30 years where a judge has acted in the way the Flynn federal judge acted. (although a federal judge in Puerto Rico came close in a case I litigated) Quite frankly, we have witnessed a coup. Why has the Right not responded? Because we have careers and families. We are not scumbags like Antifa. We are not Marxists like BLM. If they could do what they did to Flynn, they can easily do it to anyone. We live in a lawless society now. I am exiled from Cuba. I thought this would never happen here. The censorship, the cancel culture and the outright MSM propaganda is breathtaking. I don’t know if Martial law is proper, but I do believe we need a new election with federal judges and the national Guard observing certain Democrat cities “count” the votes. The statistical anomalies in these cities speaks volumes

  11. Flynn has shown himself to be a man without honor. I’m sick of his arrogance. His pardon has only increased his belief that he and the rest of Trump’s gang can get away with literally anything.

  12. Turley writes:

    “Some of us have encouraged courts to review the voting allegations of the Trump campaign and I have specifically encouraged Democrats to support such scrutiny to help resolve the widespread view of this election as flawed. I believe the failure to do so was a failure of leadership by Biden. However, dozens of lawsuits have been reviewed by the courts and rejected. This includes rulings by Trump appointees and conservative judges.”

    So, can we then agree that the judges throwing out every case brought by Trump lawyers and in some cases ridiculing their legal efforts, means the allegations you advocated pursuing were baseless partisan attacks done for political reasons and your suggestion that they be given the status of serious questions was as wrong as wrong gets? Step up Jonathan, you can do it. It’s called being a man.

    1. Almost, in the day after the election it was fair to want an honest look to make sure there was no fraud tainting the results. After a week or so when no evidence of fraud (despite great efforts) emerged, it was time to acknowledge the election was clean. A mother later everyone still even entertaining the notion of a fraudulent election is a partisan hack.

      And Biden was quite right to stay out of it and let the process work as intended.

      1. “no evidence of fraud (despite great efforts) emerged, it was time to acknowledge the election was clean”

        Plenty of evidence has been found even though you apparently are unaware of the evidence. The question is not whether or not there was corruption of the voting process. The question is whether or not the evidence to date is enough to invalidate the election and at what level.

      2. Except for the incidents of fraud that have been reported in sworn affidavits, and the completely unprecedented event that occurred around 2am where the swing states stopped counting votes on what appeared to be cued and the broadcast networks all closed up shop…sure, nobody saw that happen and pass the bananas.

    2. I for one do not begrudge Turley for advocating the litigation of legitimate allegations of voter fraud. What I do protest is his claim that there exists a widespread belief in voter fraud, the notion of which it behooves the Democrats to disabuse the public. Turley pretends to ignore the fact that this belief of widespread fraud was foisted upon the public by Trumpian LIES! It was a scam to raise $200 million for political purposes which Turley knows perfectly well but dares not acknowledge it publicly because he does not want to take sides for fear of burning his bridges with either side.

  13. Jonathan, twitter is a strange beast. Just because he retweeted it, doesn’t mean that it is an endorsement. Thinking that it is an endorsement is common though. Flynn should clarify but it doesn’t mean that he endorses the tweet.

    1. No, retweeting like Flynn did is defiantly an endorsement. The only way it would not be is if you added a comment like “This is some dumb shit!”

  14. With all due respect Jonathan, Flynn’s statement “Freedom never kneels except for God” can easily be interpreted as meaning that imposing martial law would be against freedom and therefore he does not support it.

    I don’t know which interpretation is accurate to Flynn’s intent, Flynn NEEDS to clarify his intent.

    1. He’s retweeted the #WeThePeople hashtag several times. He hasn’t criticized them in any of his tweets. He’s made his intent clear.

  15. You should also have noted that Sidney Powell, a lawyer, and someone who appeared at press conferences for Trump’s legal team, also retweeted Flynn’s call for martial law and a new election. Lawyers are supposed to defend the Constitution. Here this lawyer is supporting an unconstitutional coup. She should be disbarred for this (and her other behavior in these cases and wildly unsupported allegations at press conferences).

  16. At this stage of the game, the more extreme members of the right are demanding a legal solution to the problems they see. If the problems are not solved, then the next solution offered is going to be considerably less pleasant. And it will come to that if somethings not done.

    1. The more extreme members of the right are already calling for civil war. That is not a legal solution.

  17. It’s not just that the Military has the right the duty and the honor to protect the Constitution. They have no choice and can do it on their own. We now have a direct threat given the programs put forth by Biden and Harris, Schumer and Pelosi and a large amounts of the former Democrat party turned socialist. This is the correct step to protect our nation, our Constitutional Republic and our Constitution against given the information provided by sources such as Just Facts and the FACT those mentioned above convicted themselves out of their own mouths to take. As a survivor of the Vietnam War one started by Lyndon B Johnson I join other veterans retired and former to call for the military to do their duty and uphold their oath of office. Shouldn’t take more than a weekend. Then let the Supreme Court using the rules provided by the Constitution choose a temporary National Executive or the current two as the only candidates left standing or choosing Pence or someone else to take the spot pending their deliberations. But give in to Marxist Leninist a foreign ideology of socialism? NEVER! US Army Infantry 23 years and I never did nor never will change my allegiance from my oath of office. Protect and Defend The Constitution….. and the rest is how to only The Constitution holds o0ur allegiance. I hold no loyalty to the spawn who created Communists, Nazi’s and the Socialist Regessive Liberals. Objective moral values come first and the enemies domestic have NO place in line.

      1. What I meant to say is that your clear misunderstanding of the Constitution and the role of the military and Supreme Court could easily be explained by traumatic brain injury due to combat. Thank you sir for your service and sacrifice.

      2. Only a juvenile liberal would say such a thing. You my dear represent the worst of the United States Of America!

            1. After a decent statement from Molly you add your own and prove to the list what type of vulgar person you are.

              1. Actually I just love whipping up the trump mutants with their own medicine until they bring their righteous indignation to the party.

                1. Molly proved herself. She recognized something she said that was wrong.

                  You double down and can’t let Molly’s statement sit on the high road. You make it all about yourself and how you get even with those that support your candidate’s opponent. You call them mutants. How fitting for such a vulgar ignorant fool.

      3. Molly- Just curious before you malign an American Patriot just how have you served this nation and put you rear end on the line. You want to challenge an option that’s fine but no need to belittle a poster. Just saying Molly. I’m not the brightest candle on the cake but I can appreciate respect even if I don’t agree and no I didn’t take a round in the head while I served.

        1. He served as the hilltop telephone operator and receptionist; busy doing his nails while American men fought and died.

          He uses a fraudulent, misleading moniker to steal the glory of the wounded patriots who suffered and the dead who gave all.

          Vietshame is his true Nome-de-cowardice.

      4. Wow, you stoop as low as one can go. You seem to have no respect for anyone.and a lack of knowledge to go along with your lack of respect.

    1. it will take more than a weekend to arrest 700 billionaires for seditious conspiracy, strip their assets with rico, and execute lawful punishments

      but that’s what should happen./……. but dont hold your breath

      Saloth Sar

  18. This thread and the other thread have a lot in common. When proper laws are not upheld people start to take the law into their own hands. As seen with Flynn our justice system has become political.

Leave a Reply