Will Pot Save The President? Michigan Judge Orders Forensic Investigation of Roughly Two Dozen Dominion Voting Machines

The Trump campaign finally succeeded in one of its challenges yesterday to the extent that it was granted a court order for access and a forensic investigation of roughly two dozen Dominion voting machines. The machines are located in rural Antrim County where roughly 6000 votes were initially assigned to President-elect Joe Biden but then corrected and tabulated in favor of President Donald Trump. Four weeks ago, we discussed this controversy and the concern that such acknowledged human error could occur in other districts. The order from Judge Kevin Elsenheimer, however, concerns not the presidential election but a recounting of ballots in a village marijuana proposal.

Even though the challenge by voter William Bailey concerned legalized marijuana, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani proclaimed a great victory for “BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS.”

The actual order concerns a recounting of the marijuana proposal in the Village of Central Lake that passed by one vote.  However, it will afford critics the first crack at Dominion machines to justify their claims of tampering with votes.

For weeks, I have been expressing skepticism over the campaign challenges but also criticism of the Biden campaign for opposing such efforts to examine these allegations. There have been unlawful orders and voting irregularities.  The problem for the Trump campaign has been establishing systemic errors or fraud that would overturn any of these state elections.  There is also the “sticker shock” problem in seeking to block certification of the state electoral votes. Finally, the campaign has been stymied in its effort to gain access to evidence, and machines, in the possession of the election officials.

I am gladdened by the order not because I think that it is likely to uncover any problem. I do not. Rather, polls show that up to 90 percent of Republicans and even a fair number of Democrats believe question the legitimacy of this election. With roughly 74 million voting for President Trump, such doubts are dangerous for this country which remains a virtual powder keg. The best option is greater scrutiny and transparency.

We have had failures of leadership on both sides. President Trump has fueled the anger not by seeking challenges, which is his right. He has field by anger by declaring the election “stolen” and “rigged” and acting officials like Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger the “enemy of the people.” President-elect Biden failed to see that this country’s divisions will not be resolved — even partially — without greater scrutiny.  He should have declared immediately that his campaign would not oppose judicial review of any and all election challenges.

Many of these cases have been dismissed on standing or laches or other threshold challenges. This order will assure skeptical voters that access to evidence has been granted.  It will not persuade many if no problems are found, but it could persuade some. Otherwise, we will be left with same unadulterated rage from the last four years.

That is why I am gladdened by the order and hope that, to the greatest extent possible, such access can be granted in the future. Otherwise, we are looking at an exceptionally destructive and even dangerous period in our history.

 

227 thoughts on “Will Pot Save The President? Michigan Judge Orders Forensic Investigation of Roughly Two Dozen Dominion Voting Machines”

  1. The 2020 election has been totally corrupted and is irredeemable and without remedy.

    The 2020 election must be referred to Congress by the electors.

    12th Amendment

    “…The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote;…”

    1. All these electronic voting systems have for decades have been known by many for having fraudulent voting results. I’ve been against the way they worked since the 80’s. Dem & Repub Rino deep state polecats are still fine with it as that’s how they’ve been winning their primaries to win the general.

      My question now is with such a totally corrupt voting system now, is to your comment, how can we the citizens leave this choice to the 11/3/2020 fraudulently selected US reps? : “…….the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote;…”.

      As I see things there is no way in hell others & I can except the Biden/Dem/Rino Repub election fraud.

      1. If you think it’s all fraudulent, then the Representatives in the House were also elected via fraud, and you cannot leave the decision to them either.

        1. So What ?

          I do not think there is fraud – there is.
          The only question is the extent to which it effected the outcome of the election.

          You are addressing the remedy.

          I have no problem deciding the entire election must be tossed, or we can toss all elections in states where the election laws were not followed. or we can toss all elections in districts where the laws were not followed.

          Regardless, you are addressing how do we fix the fraud.

          I am open to suggestions ?

      2. billionaires are the enemy of the people. not “brad” raffleburger. not even the corrupt Dems/ RINOs. they are just hirelings.

        Billionaires are the enemy. name them and dare to smite them and things will get better

        Saloth Sar

        1. Fundimentally it does not matter how easy the machines are to hack.

          What matters is that the process is structed to assure that any hacking will be caught and punished.

          That requires atleast random audits – hand count ballots from machines at random after the election.

          That must be a requirement.

  2. Of Biden would not cooperate with an investigation of the voting irregularities because he probably knew about the planned election fraud and approved of it.

  3. Many Trump supporters are not going to accept Biden’s election is legitimate no matter what happens after the machines are examined. There are too many anomalies.

    There have been probably hundreds of affidavits sworn out by people alleging outright fraud; dead people voting; disregard for established procedures concerning supervision and observation of vote counting; accepting unverifiable signatures on mail in votes; accepting ballots after statutorily defined deadline dates; and so on.

    Then there are the indisputable facts:

    Obama got 2.5 million fewer votes in 2012 than he got in 2008. He won re-election. Trump got 12 million more votes in 2020 than he got in 2016. Yet Trump lost.

    Republicans expanded the number of seats they control in the House by a net of around 11. Yet Trump lost.

    Republicans won every single one of the 27 Congressional races Cook rated as “toss up”. Tet Trump “lost”.

    Republicans had to defend 23 Senate seats to Democrats 12. Before the GA runoff, it’s 50-48 in favor of Republicans.

    Republicans did not lose any chamber in state legislatures. In fact, they kept all they controlled before the election and added control of both houses in New Hampshire. Yet Trump lost.

      1. Alot of people do not like or trust democrats, the media or the left – because they have lied constantly.

        And that is why 10M more people voted for Trump in 2020 than 2016.

        And that is why they do not beleive you, the media, democrats or the left when they say that there was no fraud.

        Credibility requires not being actually caught repeatedly in lies.

            1. withhold your supposedly lawful income taxes as a “PEACEFUL PROTEST”

              When we get 70 million people doing that, the house of cards will tumble

              billionaires are the enemy. it’s taken me a couple weeks to figure out an easy way to punch them in the nads

              this one is doable. you don’t even have to get off the couch for this one.

              Saloth Sar

          1. Both false and irrelevant.

            Pretty much everything you have claimed he was lying about – he was not.

            Further he has kept more campaign promises than probably any president ever.

            Finally – this is not about Trump – this is about democrats. Worse about democrats in power and their abuse of power.

            What laws has Trump broken ? I can cite numerous ones his opponents have.

            Did Trump sic the IRS on democratic groups ?

            Did Trump spy on Senators and Journalists ?

            Did Trump lie under oath about a terrorist attack that killed a US ambassador ?

            Did Trump file perjorious applications for FISA warrants ?

            Did Trump extort foreign countries to benefit his son financially ?

  4. “Alito Moves Up Deadline For Supreme Court Briefing In Pennsylvania Case, Bringing Within ‘Safe Harbor’ Window To Intervene”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/alito-moves-deadline-supreme-court-briefing-pennsylvania-case-bringing-within-safe-harbor

    Meanwhile, 3 Dominion employees are turning state’s evidence and are going to testify that 3.8 million votes were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

    and

    “Bombshell: Trump Legal Team Witness Alleged That Ware County Audit Results Revealed Dominion Machine Flipped Ballots from Trump to Biden:

    https://georgiastarnews.com/2020/12/05/trump-legal-team-witness-alleged-that-ware-county-audit-results-revealed-dominion-machine-flipped-ballots-from-trump-to-biden/

  5. “America’s Future? Marxist Tyrant Maduro Looks to Capture National Assembly — Will Complete Stranglehold on Venezuelan People Since Rigged Smartmatic Election for Chavez Back in 2004”

    The chairman of Smartmatic was Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, who sat in the British House of Lords and on the board of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. He was formerly the vice-chairman of Soros’s Investment Funds and even the deputy secretary-general of the United Nations when he worked as chief of staff to Kofi Annan. Lord Malloch-Brown was promoted to serve as President of the Soros Open Society Foundation. According to Wikileaks documents Smartmatic machines were used to rig the 2004 Venezuela elections in favor of Marxist candidate Hugo Chavez.

    More from Wikileaks: Smartmatic is a riddle. The company came out of nowhere to snatch a multli-million dollar contract in an electoral process that ultimately reaffirmed Chavez’ mandate and all-but destroyed his political opposition. The Smartmatic owners, were denounced in June 2004 by the press for having received a US $200,000 equity investment from a Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (BRV) joint venture fund called FONCREI which was a Chavez organization. A Chavez campaign adviser was also placed on the board as well.

    Since 2004 Venezuela has been led by Marxist tyrants Hugo Chavez and then Nicolas Maduro. Maduro is holding elections today on the final segment of government he does not control — the Parliament. No doubt, the voting machines will allow for a HUGE win for the Marxists later today.

    The people are eating out of trash cans today in Venezuela. Socialism is not working — once again.

    This all started with a stolen election.

    THIS ALL STARTED WITH A STOLEN ELECTION.

    – Jim Hoft

    1. “Virtual precincts” — charming. So they programmed the Dominion machines to create the right mix of flipped (illegal) votes and legal votes — to make the results appear legitimate, i.e., to avoid detection.

      For that, you can thank Dominion’s corrupt *Security Chief* (now, former), Eric Coomer. And the $400 million invested in Staple/Dominion by China.

      1. here’s a way we can punch both the CCP Chicoms and the American globalist billionaires in the gut without even getting off the couch:

        #TAXPROTEST2020

        an idea whose time has come

        refuse them your taxes in April and Treasuries owned by the billionaires and the CCP will plummet in value

        it’s the only way we can screw them like they screwed us– and an easy way, to boot

        not one shot need be fired and good luck catching everyone if we roll together

        the workers and middle class of America must rebel against the billionaires. now or never, the time is now

        fake election, no legitimacy, no taxes!

        Saloth Sar

  6. Election Fraud in the US has been going on for decades & it needs to be stopped right here/right now with a complete new nation wide election with paper ballots, picture IDs for everyone, hand counted/reported from local precincts by local voters, with poll watchers & pictures of all the ballots immediately release for all the public to see & use to check for fraud.

    “Dilbert creator Scott Adams summarizes the entire country-wide criminal election fraud in one simple succinct observation.
    Bullies kicked out witnesses!”

    Every phk’in thing else doesn’t matter.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/dilbert-creator-scott-adams-2020-election-non-transparent-force-illegitimate-period/

      1. Exactly Losers.

        It’s clear many of you have decided to be Chinese Communist Traitors that hate this US type Republic so you should move there now as all this has little to do with the current figurehead Trump but everything to do our choice of types of a government.

        1. The true traitors who hate the US are the ones trying to overthrow a legal and clean election.

          1. Wow! Molly, you’re super smart today! Exactly again you are correct, Biden & his supporters are Traitors attempting to overthrow a legal clean election!!!

            Go back to China now & take all your Satin worshipping Pedo friends with you.!

  7. Although I am not a regular on this forum, I have always been struck by what I felt were well thought out and informed comments. This morning I find myself very disappointed by the tone of many comments. Yes, people are entitled to their opinions.

    Still, I get the distinct impression the Trump Derangement Syndrome has so clouded the perspective of many of the posters here that they are unable or unwilling to support the validation of the integrity of this last election. That is perplexing when I witness so much outright fraud taking many different forms in many other counties and states.

    1. You must really not be a regular if you think the tone of the comments today are out of ordinary. This blog has vile commentators.

  8. Instead of calling Joseph Biden the ‘President Elect’, which he is not, since the Electoral College has yet to assemble, you should rather call out the creation of a phony ‘Office of the President Elect’ by the Biden transition team. Such criticism would be more in line with the factual and impartial observations your readers have come to appreciate.

    1. R.M., right after the 2016 election results were in, Trump was called the President Elect and spoke before a podium his team provided that said “President Elect”.

      No one had a problem with that, including one guesses, you. But thanks anyway for another desperate and small mined attempt to forestall the inevitable. Poor loser behavior is a refection on Team Trump, not Biden, and is entertaining in a perverse sort of way.

    2. Biden is the President-elect now before the EC meets as Trump was in 2016, and all before them for the last 80 years. Only in 2000 could no one claim the title because there was a legitimate uncertainty over the results.

      1. This is 2000 part two, Molly.

        But this one has far greater implications.

        Gore wasn’t an old guy with Dementia, like Biden.

        Who they plan to get rid of as quickly as possible if he takes office.

        Plus Gore wasn’t staring down the barrel of of gun held by John Durham.

        1. In 2000 it could have gone either way. In 2020 Trump lost decisively. If Durham had anything it would have been out now. You will be as disappointed with Durham as the left was with Mueller.

          1. Rhodes holds onto 3 bedtime stories to help him sleep at night:

            Durham – we’ve been hearing for a year and half how Durham was going to the Democrats nightmare and would leaf to frog marching Obama and Biden (and Pelosi and Schumer, whoever you want to name) into jail. Guess what? Nothing and now Barr said publicly that the “investigation” is down to only FBI agents. Look it up.

            Fraud – the scoreboard reads 46-1 and Rhodes is losing.

            Biden is senile – Biden won both debates and didn’t have to lie constantly to do it, as his opponent did. He knows more about domestic and international conditions and issues than Trump, doesn’t sit in bed until 11:00 AM watching TV and tweeting every morning, reads briefing materials developed for the President – and VP – only, and isn’t guided primarily by perverse attention seeking like Trump.

            On the good side Rhodes, you won;t be hearing from or about Biden every f..king day like Trump demands. Enjoy.

            1. “and didn’t have to lie constantly to do it”

              Biden is a lifelong pathological liar. Everyone in DC knows it. Biden’s entire campaign was based on a lie. Everything out of Biden’s mouth during his campaign (if you can call it that) was a flatout lie. And Biden knows it. So do the Fake News Media.

              “doesn’t sit in bed until 11:00 AM watching TV and tweeting every morning”

              Maybe not, but Trump doesn’t go from his shower to chasing his dog naked trying to pull its tail, only to slip on a rug and fracture his foot. Good Lord. I’ll take Trump every day of the week over the inept, lying, corrupt, senile doddering old man who cheated to win and who has the media dutifully covering up for him every step of the way.

              Hey Joe, are you the Big Guy? Hey Joe, did you in fact meet with Tony Bobulinski at a meeting in a Beverly HIlls hotel as he said you did?

              Is Biden EVER goint to be asked REAL questions? hahahahhhaaaa. Of course not.

              “On the good side Rhodes, you won;t be hearing from or about Biden every f..king day”

              No you will not. Fat chance you will hear jack squat out of the Biden White House. It will be even more opaque, secretive and hostile to the press and un-forthcoming than Obama admin was. Why? Because Joe Biden is f’ing senile. And the entire Biden family is bought and paid for by China.

              It’s disgusting.

  9. Common cannabis side effect sheds light on Republicans’ paranoid deep state conspiracy claims?

    Judge Jeanine launched quite an attack on AG Barr in her open last night.

    Biden and Harris, meanwhile, must be thinking hard about border security, naturalization pathways for the undocumented, the future of Central American immigration and the normalization of taxable legal cannabis trade with Mexico and Canada.

    Xavier Becerra might be Biden’s best appointment for Attorney General.

    Here is AG Becerra’s link to cannabis and ongoing COVID-19 relief negotiations between Congress and the White House:

    https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-becerra-urges-congress-provide-licensed-cannabis-related

    “California Attorney General Xavier Becerra today, as part of a bipartisan coalition of 34 attorneys general, urged the U.S. Congress to include legislation that provides licensed cannabis businesses access to the federal banking system as part of any future coronavirus relief package. In their letter, the coalition highlights that passage of the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act or similar legislation would provide much-needed revenue to state and local governments through more efficient tax collection.”

    1. updating federal laws to square with state legalization of cannabis is a no brainer.

      it comes regardless of who wins

      billionaires like that too. helps keep the people doped up so they continue to submit to plutocratic malfeasance

      Saloth Sar

  10. “Many of these cases have been dismissed on standing or laches or other threshold challenges. This order will assure skeptical voters that access to evidence has been granted. It will not persuade many if no problems are found, but it could persuade some. Otherwise, we will be left with same unadulterated rage from the last four years.”

    Actually, I beg to differ, JT. Train’s left the station on this one and election mechanics are just an avenue that this rage is expressed. Let’s not forget McConnell’s obstruction throughout trump’s term and even before the ’16 election on election security.

    Biden hasn’t been obstructing the trump administration’s papering the courts with bogus lawsuits, he’s sitting back and watching them implode on their own for lack of evidence. The time to monitor machines etc. is exactly when McConnell wouldn’t allow it. To go with trump’s game (and apparently yours, Jon) would put everyone exactly where trump wants them — indulging his b.s. on a minute to minute basis while meanwhile ignoring his active election tampering efforts in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. His call to Kemp yesterday to flip the results of Georgia and install trump biased electors was truly extra special and probably should be investigated by itself by the incoming Justice Dept. Election security writ large should truly be ironed out in the upcoming Biden term, up to and including taking a deep dive into repub voter suppression efforts. Everything goes under review. But I know, I know, that wouldn’t be as fun for you guys, Turley.

    Elvis Bug

  11. If Turley genuinely believes polls, he knows half of Trump supporters believed Trump’s claim that he won the 2016 popular vote & that Obama wasn’t born in the US. Why would JT be surprised that most Trump supporters also believe Trump’s claim that there is no way Biden received 81 million votes?

    Turley predictably blames Biden for stoking division by not immediately declaring Trump & his attorneys should be given free rein to push baseless conspiracy theories even though a Trump appointed Pennsylvania judge ruled “Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections. There is no clear evidence of massive absentee-ballot fraud or forgery.”

    In Turley’s summation of events, he neglects to mention Trump fired Homeland Security officials who spent the past 4 years safeguarding our election systems from foreign & domestic interference. JT avoids mentioning Trump is pressuring Republican legislatures in 6 states Biden won to go against the will of the people & cast their electoral votes for Trump.

    If Turley is genuinely concerned about an exceptionally destructive and even dangerous period in our history, surely he will want the losing candidate to graciously concede & call for his supporters to unite behind our newly elected president. Stay tuned.

    1. Turley is part of the Trump campaign on this. The complete lack of evidence – see the courts Turley – demonstrate that he was wrong to take the desperate Loser’s claims seriously and if he were a man, he’d admit it. Instead he lies about Biden again and again acts like the fool or Trumpster who would take the claims seriously. Which is he? Could be both, but more likely a Trumpster.

      1. The lack of evidence is in your baseless and repeated assertion that Turley is a Trump proxy

        you lie even as you accuse others of it

        as you slap another person, you cry out in pain.

        Saloth Sar

  12. I was following JT for a bit, until “He should have declared immediately that his campaign would not oppose judicial review of any and all election challenges.”

    Biden was quite right to stay out of it for a number of reasons.
    1. The suits were bunk, the claims about voting fraud were lies. Anything other then opposition to these lies would give them credibility, which would hurt the trust in the vote in the long run.
    2. We do not want to set the precedent that it is valid to follow elections with a barrage of baseless suits.
    3. Full judicial review takes time, and that would just delay the transition even more, and even put the “safe harbor” data at risk.
    4. Suits that are baseless are properly dismissed at the preliminary stage, and the judges are doing their jobs but dismissing them, to keep them alive for the sake of “transparency of the election” would disrupt proper judicial procedures.
    5. These suits just tie up valuable judicial time.
    6. Adversarial, time constrained, highly partisan judicial reviews are the wrong way to audit the votes.

    1. MollyG – For nearly 3 years we were pounded with the biggest fraud called the “Steele Dossier” and as far as lies go I’m sure you’ve heard of a guy named Shitiff and his toadie Smallwall. Do you think a special counsel should be named to investigate the Biden family connections to China, Russia and their Ukrainian connections?

      I will agree with you we cannot open ourselves to challenging elections randomly but you and I should agree our elections should never be open to tampering.

      If Biden won fair and square he’s my President even though I don’t agree with the direction he’s going to take our nation.

      1. Glad to hear you say that VV and unfortunately Trump was my President for the last 4 years.

        However, you are being fed a pile of manure you are not compelled to eat and I guarantee – I’ll bet money – your eating it will make no difference in the results. It’s your choice of course.

    2. My golly your another sophomore sophist. Pennsylvania and other states where voter id at the polls was passed 6 or more years ago the democrats immediately got an injuntion and stalled all the way to the United States Supreme Court where it was found Constitutional. The democrats the sought injunctions on differnt grounds and delayed implementation for more years. This year many election laws were changed and immediately put into effect. Then after the votes in the five battle ground states were tabulated the democrats refused to allow a forensic audit, not of the entire country not even the Battleground states but won’t allow a full audit of just five or six counties. If the forensic audit of say Philadelphia found no fraud then I would accept the election results. If some fraud found say, as little as 1,000 ballots then Pittsburgh at least would be audited. Your just want to win at any cost and have no qualms about the methods used. For instance the dismissal of the Pennsylvania lawsuit on the grounds it was not made in a timely manner as specified in the legislation article 77 is incorrect. If legislation is unconstitutional then the question becomes is the unconstituional provision in the legislation SEVERABLE and removed leaving the rest in force. The provision setting time constraints explicitly states the changes if unconstitutional were SEVERABLE for six months, after that they became intrinsic to the entire legislation and if found unconstitutional the entire October 2019 Article 77 is voided and the election laws in effect before would be reinstated. Article 77 would have to be re legislated, voted on, and passed before being in effect. Oh I agree, all I had was Civics classes 60 years ago and am probably wrong but the truth is more important than winning.

      1. In 2019 PA passed Act 77. That purportedly did several things.

        First – democrats accepted that PA was a voter ID state. The battle over Voter ID was purportedly over.

        In return Republicans allow no fault absentee ballots and some mailin voting – they did not anticipate Covid or 50% of the election being mailin.

        Regardless, the republicans got several measures to substantially reduce fraud.

        No ballots were to be accepted after 8pm election day.

        All mailin and absentee ballots were REQUIRED by law to has a signature – which must be validated AND a PA Drivers license or PA ID # on the envelope. A ballot absent a matching signature and a valid DL# to match the name was to be rejected.

        In Philadelphia counters ignored ALL of these provisions – at the direction of the PA supreme court and Gov. Wolf.

        These laws should have resulted in a higher than normal rejection rate for PA mailin ballots. And though mailin balloting would still be problematic – mailin ballots do not meet the criteria for secret ballots and can not therefore votes can be induced or coerced.
        Still this would have made fraud much much much harder.

        Which is why it was ignored.

        I do not know that PA legislators will vote to decertify PA. But one should not presume the entire PA republican legislative majority is PISSED. They came to a reasonable compromise with Wolf and democrats – and the democrats LIED.

        It will take years to get passed this. I expect that Wolf will be unable to get anything from republicans for the remainder of his term.

        In the future republicans have ZERO reason to compromise or trust democrats.

        That has consequences.

  13. In person, voter ID, absentee to the military. I had to provide more proof for a DL then I did to vote for leadership of the nation.

      1. JoeF – Do you have evidence that I should have questioned the results of the 2016 election?

        1. No, and you don’t have evidence to question the 2020 election.

          Should I point to the scoreboard on court cases, not random BS either not significant enough to change results or obvious crap from the poor Loser and his enablers?

    1. Problem with voter ID is that many states make it hard for people to get IDs, such as very limited DMV hours and locations, and making it hard to get supporting documents. Would you be supportive of legislation and funding to make it as easy as possible to get IDs?

      1. MollyG-Absolutely I would agree to making it easy to obtain legitimate voter ID but let’s make sure it’s legitimate. I think we both want the same thing, how do we get there? You and I both know when we want something bad enough and there are hurtles to jump we find a way.

        1. Let’s make a deal V V: Mandatory voter ID with proactive providing them to to all, including the poor, students, sick, irregardless of race and in turn reform on the electoral college to require representative allocation of electors – like Maine and Nebraska – not the winner take all system all other states employ. Given that Kerry needed only 60k votes switched in Ohio in 2004 to win the presidency without the popular vote, this could bite the GOP in the ass and you’d become believers. Democrats have suffered though this nonsense twice in 16 years. Representative allocation could still result in a popular vote loser winning the election, but the odds become much more unlikely.

          We might add reform on gerrymandering by requiring non-partisan commissions doing the redistricting instead of the state legislators. This could be mandated for House members and hopefully it would spread to state legislatures. Some states already do this.

  14. If there is reason to believe that the machines’ software were jiggered to favor one candidate or issue over another . . . where have those machines been since the election? Were they under the supervision of the election commissions, or just shoved into a dark closet somewhere? Who has had access in the mean time? If it IS possible to quickly and surreptitiously change the software to achieve a ‘ desired result ‘ on election day, who can guarantee that the malicious software hasn’t been removed? . . . Where is the proof !?

  15. JT condemns “the Biden campaign for opposing such efforts to examine these allegations,” when the Biden Campaign hasn’t opposed it. JT just lies about it.

    JT says that Biden “should have declared immediately that his campaign would not oppose judicial review of any and all election challenges.” He doesn’t have to declare it, since we can all see that the campaign hasn’t opposed judicial review of anything.

    He’s looking for reasons to criticize Biden here, when the craziness is all on Trump and his fans.

    We do agree that “It will not persuade many if no problems are found.” The only thing that Trump and his base will believe is their fantasy of Trump winning.

  16. So when this forensic audit finds nothing, I assume Trump and Rudy will concede like gentlemen and tell the country Biden lost fair and square. And Turley will join them in saying the election was proven to be fair and Trump’s complaints were simply wrong.

    1. Bizarro Trump wrote, “So when this forensic audit finds nothing, I assume Trump and Rudy will concede like gentlemen and tell the country Biden lost fair and square.”

      Was that statement was a classic example of a Freudian slip.

  17. “The best option is greater scrutiny and transparency.”

    QFT

    No observers, no FORENSIC audit, NO CONFIDENCE

    1. And yet Publius, I think we can safely assume that you had no hesitancy in seeing Trump declared President Elect immediately after the 2016 election, including by his opponent the next day, nor do you question the senate results this year.

      Cut the phony BS.

      1. dear turley troll in residence….

        Hitlary and her minions didn’t challenge it with any zeal why should any one else?

        Where’s the BS? the obfuscation you peddle?

        I swear to Shiva the left projects so much its hilarious.

Comments are closed.