New disclosures are demolishing the continued denials of President Biden that he had no knowledge and nothing to do with his son’s business interests. The emails (reviewed by Fox and The Daily Mail) include exchanges with at least 14 of Hunter Biden’s business associates while Joe Biden was vice president. They cast further doubt on the president’s repeated claims that he had no knowledge of his son’s foreign business dealings. In one almost plaintive email, Hunter actually complains to an associate that he had delivered on everything that was demanded of him in getting access to his father and the White House.
President Biden and the White House continue to repeat his denial from the campaign trail in 2019: “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” These denials have continued even after an audiotape surfaced showing President Biden leaving a message for Hunter specifically discussing coverage of those dealings.
Some of us have written for two years that Biden’s denial of knowledge is patently false. Indeed, it is baffling how Attorney General Garland can ignore the myriad of references to Joe Biden in refusing to appoint a special counsel.
There are emails of Ukrainian and other foreign clients thanking Hunter Biden for arranging meetings with his father. There are photos from dinners and meetings that tie President Biden to these figures, including a 2015 dinner with a group of Hunter Biden’s Russian and Kazakh clients.
People apparently were told to avoid directly referring to President Biden. In one email, Tony Bobulinski, then a business partner of Hunter’s, was instructed by Biden associate James Gilliar not to speak of the former veep’s connection to any transactions: “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u [sic] are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid.”
Instead, the emails apparently refer to President Biden with code names such as “Celtic” or “the big guy.” In one, “the big guy” is discussed as possibly receiving a 10 percent cut on a deal with a Chinese energy firm; other emails reportedly refer to Hunter Biden paying portions of his father’s expenses and taxes.
The new disclosures only add details to the the extent of his knowledge and involvement. It appears that Biden met with at least 14 of Hunter’s business associates from the U.S., Mexico, Ukraine, China and Kazakhstan over the course of his vice presidency. That includes Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani who visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room.
Hunter is clearly eager to get photos as a deliverable for the visits. In one email in April 2014 to David Lienemann, Biden’s official photographer, Hunter asks “Do you have pictures from the lunch I had in dad’s office (I think on 2/26) with Miguel Alleman [sic] Sr. And Jr. And Jeff Cooper? If so let me know and I can send someone to pick them up. Thanks. How was Kiev?”
Other emails show Hunter using trips with his Dad to arrange meetings with business associates like Magnani. Indeed, in one exchange with Magnani, Hunter complains that he is not getting responses on his business dealings, objecting
“I have brought every single person you have ever asked me to bring to the F’ing White House and the Vice President’s house and the inauguration and then you go completely silent,. I don’t know what it is that I did but I’d like to know why I’ve delivered on every single thing you’ve ever asked – and you make me feel like I’ve done something to offend you.”
The cringeworthy email only adds to the embarrassment not of Hunter Biden but Merrick Garland who continues to refuse the obvious need for a special counsel. Indeed, the public could raise the objection raised by Hunter: what does it take?
President Ten Percent
When judging presidents “loyalty” supersedes everything. Presidents and all governing officials voluntarily agree to an “indirect” loyalty oath. They swear supreme and superseding loyalty to the constitutional rule of law – not to the nation directly and not to the nation directly.
Trump was arguably the most disloyal president in American. He attempted to subvert his own Oath of Office. He was not loyal merely breaking a few laws in his pursuit of loyalty. He broke laws for his own self-serving purposes.
If this is simply about violating laws (not subverting American government), we could start indicting former Reagan officials or former Bush officials today. Biden is not perfect but he never tried to overturn an election, support an insurrection or subvert his own Oath of Office like a Trump. Carter was criticized for being too law abiding.
If Merrick Garland creates a precedent that presidents can’t subvert the constitutional rule of law and their Oath of Office that is a great precedent for future presidents. Trump took a solemn loyalty oath not to violate the U.S. Constitution. The January 6 hearings have been mostly composed of Trump Republicans that knew him best.
(OT — sort of)
The D’s are proposing a bill that floods the market with more fiat money, and that loots more money from those who are productive — both of which policies exacerbate inflation and make Americans poorer.
And they have the mendacity to call it: “The Inflation Reduction Act.”
What next — pouring gas on a fire is an act of conflagration reduction?
Well it reduces the rate of the increase of inflation by spending less money than Schumer wanted to spend. See what I did there?
“See what I did there?”
You mean like this?
“Sure I bought a $100,000 car that i can’t afford. But I was going to but the $120,000 one. So, really, I saved $20,000.”
The difference, of course, is that when an individual rationalizes, he goes bankrupt. When politicians do, the country goes bankrupt.
What can you say, Corruption, Corruption, Corruption their turning the nation into a third world country.
You gotta love the word salad their trying to explain the the recession, according to them we’re not in. Do you remember Yellen wanting to tax unrealized gains in your (4)201k and home value? Wonder if she would like to return money on our unrealized losses?
Fellow Americans this nation is in dire times put upon us by corrupt politicians. I hope there’s a God because we sure need a God to protect us from these people. The guy JM I’d hoped to protect us is folding like a cheap camera.
I’m not yet tired of saying that enhanced interrogation techniques should be used upon Hunter Biden.
Dangle some Crack or Meth and a scantily clothed Hooker in front of him…..and Bob’s yer Uncle!
Here is all you need to know about Democratic Party thinking, Democrats are as pure as the driven snow and Republicans are evil incarnate.
I’m glad I’m an Independent.
When the Hunter Biden stories escalate to a daily basis, Trump must really be in trouble. I’m not saying Hunter Biden shouldn’t be investigated or may not be guilty of some crimes. I am saying it isn’t the same thing as an attempted overthrow of the government where people died. If you want to be mad about the death of Ashli Babbitt, be mad at the man that sent her on her path.
Please provide proof of your slander, and I do not mean the opinions of those still suffering from TDS such as yourself. If there were actionable crimes the DOJ would have been on them already. the Jan 6 commission is a farcical political ploy of the dems in their last gasp of desperation. Referring to it is embarrassingly indicative of propaganda by a sheeple.
Please provide proof.
No not that proof I have been told to disbelieve.
Exhibit 2 on why the Trump cult alternative reality bubble cannot be broken by presenting truth to them. When the proof is put in front of their faces, they look away.
Proof? Enigma above, who seems to agree with you, uses hearsay or error as proof in the face of documented evidence provided by government agencies that have not acted in Trump’s favor.
Go ahead and provide your proof. You can’t even maintain a singular identity.
“ If there were actionable crimes the DOJ would have been on them already.”
They already are on it. The majority of the work on a case happens away from the public eye. It takes time to follow all the rules and regulations for an investigation, especially a criminal investigation. The evidence has to be gathered, testimony has to be put on record etc.
There are clues indicating that trump is legitimately in trouble.
They have been trying for over a quarter of a century. I guess that is not enough time for you to count your toes.
Justice ClarenceThomas, Professors Glenn Loury, John McWhorter, Thomas Sowell, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Dave Chappelle, Chris Rock and so many other brilliant and successful black thinkers. Then there are plantation blacks who cant quit being useful idiots to their White Democrat Masters. A mind is a terrible thing to waste
Ashli Babbitt only person who died murdered by cop. No one else died, moron
Anny, Please don’t use the term “cop” to describe the shooter. The “cops” are the guys and gals who put their rear ends on the line to protect you and I. Their the ones they want to defund, this guy is not a “cop”.
“ The “cops” are the guys and gals who put their rear ends on the line to protect you and I.”
And legislators who are in danger from an out of control mob. Babbitt died because she was a criminal the moment she decided to break the law and ignore commands from law enforcement.
Babbitt died because she was a criminal the moment she decided to break the law and ignore commands from law enforcement.
While we can debate this use of force, I will say your support of law enforcement to start severely cracking down on criminals is refreshing.
Smelez says: And legislators who are in danger from an out of control mob.
But that doesn’t extend to SC Justices who make decisions Smelez, Norman Bates and the Clown Crew don’t agree with. A little selective enforcement.
“When the Hunter Biden stories escalate to a daily basis, Trump must really be in trouble. I’m not saying Hunter Biden shouldn’t be investigated or may not be guilty of some crimes.”
*********************************
That’s exactly what you’re saying. You’ll being saying it right up to Trump’s second inauguartion. That post-modern, globalist liberal clap-trap is passe’ now. Welcome to the brave new world the libs will despise.
To be clear, I’m saying whatever Hunter Biden may have done, is doesn’t erase Trump (and his family) and what they’ve done. Eric stole from a kida cancer charity, all the kids participated in election lies, Jared and Ivanka made 630 million during the Trump administration. If Hunter is guilty, prosecute him and put him in jail. If Trump(s) are guilty, do no less.
CIVIL OR CRIMINAL?
Martin Luther King lied to his family as a committed philanderer, lied to his public, defrauded his congregation as a deliberate egregious sinner, plagiarized much of the dream speech and his “thesis,” and had relations with three (3) women immediately prior to his assassination according to Rev. Ralph Abernathy
_____________________________________________________________________________________
“I Shared the Dream.″
– Georgia Powers
______________
Oct 11, 1989 — Martin Luther King Jr. spent part of the night before his assassination with two women and fought with a third…
– L.A. Times
_________
And Hammered Hank Johnson thinks Guam is going to tip over and capsize.
That’s GOTTA be some kind of infraction, doesn’t it?
Enigma, you are wrong again.
I am waiting for you to respond to what was written in the summary of the Capitol Police and the IG report. They show that the hearsay and error you provide are wrong.
I’ll happily respond to testimony given under oath, under penalty of perjury. The Capitol Police wrote a letter saying there were no tours of the Capitol; the next day videos showed differently. Which would you have me believe?
.I gave you the IG report, a snippet, and a page number. A lot more exists.
I provided you with the Capitol police summary of actions.
Neither favor Trump and both were independently written. Both appear to substantiate each other.
You can say what in either report you don’t believe, but you run away and repeat the same BS. You did that with your accusations of Trump being a racist because of something happening 20 years earlier. John Say pointed out how your dates were wrong along with your information. You run away.
I want to hear what you say, but I prefer it labeled correctly with a modicum of proof. I want to teach my grandkids some of what you want them to learn, but you make that impossible by not being careful and accurate.
SM
I want my grand children to learn the truth – the good and the bad.
And the Truth is there is far more good than bad.
The nations in the world with the worst history of racism are those that are the most diverse.
We hear very little about the racist past of countries were 99.99% of people are of one race, where 98% of them are of the same tribe and church.
When the Hunter Biden stories escalate to a daily basis, Trump must really be in trouble.
Congratulations! You actually made a true statement. Not because Trump should be in trouble, but because we have a weaponized DOJ and FBI running cover for the Biden crime family.
Enigma, I am waiting for you to respond to what was written in the summary of the Capitol Police and the IG report. They show that the hearsay and error you provide are wrong.
You run away from fact.
SM
It’s welfaristic and affirmative actional jurisprudence.
“I’ve Delivered”
Like son, like father.
The “Big Guy” has delivered: Financial pain and suffering. And a rapidly cratering economy.
Garland thinks he may make deal with House republicans to go light on Hunter in return for Garland going light on Trump. It will not work. With every passing day, the evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter grows whereas the evidence – or what is purported to be evdence – againat Trump gets weaker and weaker. All that Garland’s desperate move accomplishes is to raise more questions about why he seems interested in pursuing one case but not the other. The issues with Hunter are important and cross into national security (e.g., why are we selling scarce US oil to China? How badly compromised is Biden and his father by their past multi-million dollar dark deals with the Communist Party of China?) Even the normally sycophantic media, favorable to covering up the Biden scandal and censoring any honest accounts, is rethinking things and preparing for January 2023 when they and the Bidens will have some tough questions to answer. Besides a Media Reformation we might see more whistleblowers emerge from the FBI, CIA, and DOJ, not to mention or forget Market Street in Wilmington.
It does seem that Trump claimed to have separated himself from the Trump Corporation business interests while in office. He had a press conference with his lawyer where there were piles of binders (which no one was allowed to see) attesting to this.
We learned, of course, he was heavily involved in the Trump Corporation while in office and his foreign policy took a lot of positions to benefit him and Kushner personally.
In this context, it is difficult to understand why Turley and co seem to think there is some big scandal here if Biden might have discussed his sons business interests while he was a private citizen – or even if he lied about that while Trump lied 30,000 plus times while in office.
Please Apply the Scandal Standard You Apply to Trump wrote, “Trump lied 30,000 plus times while in office.”
I’m not a Trump fan and I know that that claim is a bald-faced lie. Anyone that parrots that claim is a political hack and likely a liar.
PROVE YOUR CLAIM!!
Where is this list of lies that someone has counted?
P.S. If you try to use the Washington Post’s list as “proof” then you’re a blithering idiot that’s swallowed the propaganda hook, line and sinker.
Please provide a list as evidence.
Here’s a very long list as evidence.
No, not that list; that list is propaganda I have been told not to believe.
Exhibit 1 on why the Trump alternative reality bubble can never be popped for a lot of people.
Ask Adam Schiff….he stated hundreds of times he had the absolute solid evidence on all of this…..surely he would be publishing it unless Trump got to him somehow and made him and offer he could not refuse!
If you believe Schiff….where’s the evidence?
If Schiff is lying…and there is no evidence to be produced……who needs a prick to their bubble?
Popping the Trump Bubble
That’s the kind of reply that I’d expect from an imbecilic troll, was that what you were going for?
Well, it is still true that trump is the most prolific liar of all the presidents so far.
Here’s a link to quite a few verifiable lies that are not from the Washington post as requested. These are just 5,000 he’s told.
https://projects.thestar.com/donald-trump-fact-check/
Here’s one from that list,
“ I disagree with John McCain on the way he handled the vets, because I said you got get to Choice. He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice.”
Source: Exchange with reporters before Marine One departure in fact: This was an especially egregious lie. As usual, Trump was wrong that he was the person who got the Veterans Choice health care program passed; in fact, it was passed in 2014 and signed by Obama. (The law Trump signed in 2018, the VA MISSION Act, modified the Choice program.) This time, though, Trump went further, using his Choice non-accomplishment to suggest that he had done more for veterans than McCain — when, in reality, McCain, a Vietnam veteran himself, was the key Republican legislator behind the Choice bill in 2014. That bill was a compromise measure between McCain’s proposal and a proposal put forward by left-wing independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, who chaired the Veterans Affairs Committee. The law Trump signed to modify the program was named for McCain: it is the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018.”
There’s plenty to choose from. It seems Trump is indeed a compulsive liar. The 30,000 lie claim by the Washington post is certainly plausible given this list.
This was an especially egregious lie. As usual, Trump was wrong that he was the person who got the Veterans Choice health care program passed; in fact, it was passed in 2014 and signed by Obama.
That’s your go to example of an egregious</b lie by President Trump? Context matters, critical-thinking matters. First of all, only a moron would believe President Trump was trying to take credit for getting the VA Choice Program passed. When President Trump said: I disagree with John McCain on the way he handled the vets, because I said you got get to Choice. He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice. he was talking about how limiting the law was for the choices veterans (like myself) had. The VA Missions Act that President Trump signed to replace the Choice program significantly expanded the choices veterans would have. It also had overwhelming support in the House 347-70 and Senate 92-5.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/06/06/trump-signs-55-billion-bill-replace-va-choice-program.html
There’s plenty to choose from.
Cite them. But do your homework and understand the context.
Olly, there are plenty of examples to choose from in the link I provided. There are 5,000 choices.
No doubt.
Now do Biden.
While you make an excellent argument that the Bill passed by Trump was supperior.
As well as proving that it gave veterans more choice.
The biggest problem was that Trump was offering an OPINION – the Bill I passed was better than the one McCain passed – especially measured by a selected criteria.
That is a claim that CAN NOT be proven objectively wrong.
Joe Biden lied when he said he had nothing to do with Hunter;’s business deals – he met atleast 14 times with Hunter’s Clients as vice president.
That i OBJECTIVE a LIE.
Biden did not say “my bill was better than Trumps” – he said “I DID NOT DO X” when the FACT is he did.
If every difference of opinion is a lie – we are all liars.
All opinions are not equal. But they are also not lies.
That’s a good point John. Svelez is oblivious to the context of Trump’s statement. As I had previously pointed out, it takes a moron to believe Trump thought he was taking credit for the Choice Act, when he cites one of the authors of it. As you say, his opinion of what MCain negotiated provided far less choice for veterans than the law he signed.
Your analysis was excellent, but the fact that Trump was stating an opinion is more important.
It is important because 99.99% of left wing nut claims that someone lies are really claims that they think and opinion is wrong.
Any statement about who won the 2020 election is opinion.
The statement that the election was lawless is a fact.
The statement that the election has signficant fraud is a fact.
But any statement by anyone regarding who won the presidential election is opinion.
The TTV evidence make it unlikely that Biden won 5 of the 6 swing states.
But that is probability – not fact. It is highly unlikely those engaged in the Fraud were doing so to favor Trump.
Though it is not entirely impossible there was pro Trump fraud elsewhere (unlikely though because large scale fraud is more likely in urban areas).
Opinions can be more likely true or false – all opinions are not equal, but few if any opinions are lies.
An opinion can be stupid or improbable, but it is rarely if ever a lie.
Also if every difference of opinion is a lie than nothing is a lie.
Olly, not only that, but wasn’t the 2014 law temporary?
I went through a number of the claims. This is a contrived list without context and very little meaning. Most of the times I listen to Biden, when he is actually talking, there are blatant lies of fact.
Svelaz doesn’t bother with fact even if you spoon feed it to him.
It was due to sunset in 2017, but was extended. It was eventually replaced with Trump’s VA Mission Act. Personally, I was pleased that McCain got Veterans on track for better healthcare choices. The Mission Act along with the VA Accountability Act went so much further to benefit veterans.
My apologies for all the bold text.
That’s your go to example of an egregious lie by President Trump? Context matters, critical-thinking matters. First of all, only a moron would believe President Trump was trying to take credit for getting the VA Choice Program passed. When President Trump said: I disagree with John McCain on the way he handled the vets, because I said you got get to Choice. He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice. he was talking about how limiting the law was for the choices veterans (like myself) had. The VA Missions Act that President Trump signed to replace the Choice program significantly expanded the choices veterans would have. It also had overwhelming support in the House 347-70 and Senate 92-5.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/06/06/trump-signs-55-billion-bill-replace-va-choice-program.html
There’s plenty to choose from.
Cite them. But do your homework and understand the context.
Olly,
you said, “ Trump was trying to take credit for getting the VA Choice Program passed.”
He wasn’t trying to get credit, he claimed credit for the program.
McCain is credited with passing the VA Choice program and signed by Obama.
Trump signed the VA MISSIONS ACT.
That’s not the VA choice program which is what Trump was talking about. He wasn’t saying the VA mission act.
“ He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice.”
The context is pretty clear. He was clearly claiming McCain didn’t pass the VA Choice program. He claimed he did when he stated, “I got Choice”. He was lying and because it involved president Obama he had to claim HE was responsible for the passing of the choice act.
That’s not the VA choice program which is what Trump was talking about.
He wasn’t talking about anything other than the increase in choice benefits his program would offer compared with McCains.
And it did.
Olly,
You nailed it.
Thank you brother.
Olly, “ He wasn’t talking about anything other than the increase in choice benefits his program would offer compared with McCains.”
No he wasn’t talking about the increase. He was claiming credit for a program that McCain passed and Obama signed into law as his work.
You’re deliberately adding more to the quote that is not there.
“ I disagree with John McCain on the way he handled the vets, because I said you got get to Choice. He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice.”
He lied.
Logic is clearly not your Forte.
He was comparing his actions to those of McCain.
Only morons think Trump was talking about the name of the law.
Rephrase the argument as you claim and that should be obvious.
Trump did not say McCain tried to pass “the Choice Act” – but failed, and I passed “the choice act”
He said McCain tried to give vets choices, and failed but Trump gave them choices.
It is quite clear from the remarks you cite that you are wrong.
Trump NEVER refered to “the choice act”.
This is typical democrat BS.
The merits of a law are what is DOES, not what it is NAMED.
The context is clear, and you are clearly wrong.
If Trump meant the choice act, he would have said “the choice act”.
Trump was refering to what he actually accomplished – not the name of the bill.
Svelaz used this statement as proof that Trump is a liar, “I disagree with John McCain on the way he handled the vets, because I said you got get to Choice. He was never able to get Choice. I got Choice.”
No dumba$$, that’s not a friggin’ lie that twisted BS! God you trolls are dumb as a box of rocks. Olly covered the truth, read it an learn.
If you and your Democratic Party counterparts actually applied the same standard of applying the word “lie” to statements from politicians like Biden and his administration of paid hacks and liars then they are following the Trump “lie” count almost note for note, week for week.
I’m NOT saying that Trump has NEVER lied, just that the claims of tens of thousands of lies is in face a Democratic Party propaganda talking point LIE!
This claim that Trump lied is a lie.
That those on the left do not understand is disturbing.
The country is splitting between a highly educated progressive white elite and the working class.
What is especially concerning is that it is increasingly obvious that ordinary plumbers are better at critical thinking that multiple doctorates.
That dam;s or educational system. Which increasingly makes people WORSE than they started.
From YOUR site, this is there First example of a Trump “lie”
“”Democrats can’t impeach a Republican President for crimes committed by Democrats.”
Source: Twitter
in fact: There is no evidence that major Russia-related crimes were committed by “the Democrats.””
Need I go any further ? YOUR source proves itself idiotic and lacking credibility with its FIRST claim.
falsus in unum, falsus in obmnibus.
If you want to be beleived
Find a better source.
With respect to your “Choice” example.
You seem to equate passing specific bills with accomplishing something.
You do not address whether the 2014 or th3 2018 bill are meaningful.
Congress passes lots of legislation all the time.
Nearly all of it is BAD.
Passing legislation is not an accomplishment.
Passing GOOD legislation is.
Regardless, the Statement by Trump is OBVIOUSLY a statement of opinion of the type that NEVER can be a lie.
Trump had nothing to do with this. Give it a break.
Perhaps our escalating involvement with Ukraine, our embarrassing withdrawal from Afghanistan and our blatant impotency in China are the difference. Oh, and then there is Pelosi the insider trader… Which of these situations have put us in the most peril?
We learned, of course, he was heavily involved in the Trump Corporation while in office and his foreign policy took a lot of positions to benefit him and Kushner personally.
President Trump made a lot of foreign and domestic policy decisions that benefitted the entire country. That would include the Trump Corporation and any other American business. Conversely, Biden not only has taken foreign and domestic policy positions that have negatively impacted the entire country, he has benefitted countries hostile to the United States and enriched himself and his family in the process.
We learned, of course, he was heavily involved in the Trump Corporation while in office and his foreign policy took a lot of positions to benefit him and Kushner personally.
Who is this “we” you speak of. I have learned no such think, and have not seen anyone make such a claim
Thank you for staying on this Biden corruption. I am 81, have had an avid interest in politics, history and many subjects over my lifetime. I’ve seen scandals come and go, and watched most filmed congressional hearings ad nauseam. The corruption of our institutions is touching absolute. Don’t ask what is corrupted, but rather what is not corrupted. The FBI has had a foot in corruption since its inception, creating charges to make people say waht’s needed to get a conviction for someone else. Getting legislation passed – like confisation of property, such as houses, vehicles and cash, if you are arrested and are in possession of possible evidence. One could describe this set up as an FBI exclusive power. Hoover was criminal in his misuse of FBI power from the outset. The legal profession has been absent, a silent partner in crime. We need to get rid of this travesty, this FBI, now. It was Rosemary’s Baby when it was born, though wrapped in a clean, precious U. S. flag. To extend my metaphor, we need to clean out the minions of corrupted bureaucracies that comprise many of our government institutions, and slowly reform and renew ourselves with truth and honesty.
Remember J.Edger Hoover. He had files on everybody. Nobody would dare cross him. He had dirt on everybody.
After one obvious item after another linking Joe Biden with his son’s corrupt business dealings it appears as if it is now undeniable and therefore Merrick Garland and the DOJ will bring evidence to a Grand Jury and ultimately indict…Donald Trump.
Garland is the most corrupt AG since Eric Holder, the AG when Biden was VP.
🤔🙄 Great point.
In order to save the corrupt skins of countless dem operatives, that party of grifters is willing to destroy our very system of law and order – and hence our constitution and nation. Anyone still adhering to the dem party at this point looks either corrupt or moronically naïve.
RE:”and therefore Merrick Garland and the DOJ will bring evidence to a Grand Jury and ultimately indict…Donald Trump…”The best advice in matters such as these is to continue to breath until CNN, NYT, and WAPO report it as incontrovertible fact prior to the Midterms, if ever.
The only reason you are calling it “corrupt” is because you can’t claim any of it is actually illegal or criminal. Because it’s much easier to make accusations instead of having proof.
RE:”what does it take?..” It’s take the same kind of concerted action that was taken when Trump’s Ukraine telephone conversation was ‘whistleblown’.. However, don’t expect it to be a Democrat finger checking this prostate.
As long as Biden, his administration and the Democratic party can rely on gaslighting to be carried by the MSM pipeline, Garland won’t need to do anything.
Over the next 3 months, we will likely see some new crisis that will impact the midterms. And if the midterms do flip Congress, expect that lame duck body to go out swinging.
Folks, they are all doing this, not just the Bidens. This is the swamp that Trump wants to drain and this is the reason they hate and fear him so much.
Trump is the swampiest of the swamp creatures. He has filled the swamp with more swamp. In the dictionary for swamp, there is a picture of Trump.
Yes, whole biden fam is dirty$$$$ and their ‘dealings’ are a existential threat to our republic. But, the real story here is how the state apparatus has worked over time to protect the bidens and attempt to suppress any and all of their crimes. Exhibit A. Hunter. Exhibit B. Per texts former head of fbi (Louis Freeh) calls joe “Dad”????
Mr Jonathan Turley in some ways your worse than Garland. You’ve been either a fellow Traveler or a useful idiot. All it takes is for good men to do nothing and evil flourishes. Well what have you done. I know your excuse already. I didn’t know Bah Humbug. A pox upon your house and people of your ilk. What is it going to take to make you act.
I’m curious to know what kind of power you think Turley has in order to “act”. He has NO authority whatsoever with regards to any part of the Federal Government, or any entity within. So tell us: What have YOU done? YOU have the same power Turley has!
That comment is pure ad hominem. Stop trolling.
What of the media outlets that stifled this outrageous…dare I say national security breaching…wheeling and dealing?
Our current president is compromised by foreign entities!
Unacceptable!!!
The evidence mounts and that partisan hack Garland does nothing.
Dems have corrupted the DOJ and ordinary Americans can only wonder at the double standards in Washington.
In the meantime, watch our resident lefties cry “What about Trump?” or complain that Turley isn’t writing what they want him to say.
Garland has shown himself to be a good soldier in the Biden crime family.