Bizarre, Politics

Code Pink or “Pinko Commies”? Pelosi Wants the FBI to Find Out
We discussed earlier how former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CNN that the pro-Palestinian protesters outside her house could be Putin “plants” and called for a new Russian investigation. Now Code Pink, a far left group, has pushed back to defend their protests as Pelosi again calls for a federal investigation into protest groups and their funding.

To recap, Pelosi has long been criticized for her refusal to condemn violent protests on the left and targeting of public figures at restaurants. Those protests were no conspiracy but rather an example of how “people will do what people do.”

When the protesters appeared at her house, however, she saw nothing but Russians — or their fellow travelers.

She told CNN’s Dana Bash:

“They are in front of my house all the time. I have a feeling for what feelings they have. But we have to think about what we’re doing. And what we have to do is try to stop the suffering in Gaza. This is women and children, people who don’t have a place to go, so let’s address that. But for them to call for a cease-fire is Mr. Putin’s message, Mr. Putin’s message. Make no mistake, this is directly connected to what he would like to see. Same thing with Ukraine. It’s about Putin’s message. I think some of these protesters are spontaneous, and organic and sincere. Some, I think, are connected to Russia. I say that having looked at this for a long time.”

When Bash followed up to ask whether she was actually stating that these protesters are “Russian plants,” Pelosi doubled down and said that the groups and their financing “should be investigated.”

A Pelosi spokesperson has now attempted to moderate the comments while insisting that there is a possible Russian conspiracy. While emphasizing that she supports free speech, Pelosi has her suspicions. A news outlet was reminded that Pelosi knows what she is talking about after “three decades on the House Intelligence Committee.” Presumably, that was the same experience that led to the last debunked Russian conspiracy investigation involving the 2016 election.

For critics, Pelosi and many of her colleagues declare every ink blot on every political Rorschach test as “Russians!”

The spokesperson explained that “Speaker Pelosi is acutely aware of how foreign adversaries meddle in American politics to sow division and impact our elections, and she wants to see further investigation ahead of the 2024 election.”

Pelosi makes clear that “the modern champions of communism have selected this as the time, and ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down – they are truly down.” Oh wait, that was Joe McCarthy, but you get the idea.

Some of the groups involved in the protests did not take kindly to the push for a federal investigation, including Code Pink – a long ally of Democrats.

The group’s founder Medea Benjamin said that it has led many of the pro-Palestinian protests and demanded an investigation of Pelosi.

Of course, that is what any Russian agent would say. After all, didn’t Joe McCarthy refer to enemies as “Pinko commies.” Pelosi is only now proving him correct by showing that Code Pink is coded red.

The problem with Code Pink’s denial is that Benjamin failed to address the bombshell evidence previously uncovered and revealed for the first time on this blog. The brief video shows actual Russian agents training to enter a small New England town — precisely the type of street operation suspected by Pelosi:

 

110 thoughts on “Code Pink or “Pinko Commies”? Pelosi Wants the FBI to Find Out”

  1. Does she think Russia is in China?? Why did Delusional Nasty Nancy, yell at them to “GO HOME TO CHINA” if they were Russian?? Me thinks Nasty Nancy is losing it faster than Delusional Joe!

    Reply

  2. What’s interesting is that Progressives, like Ms. Pelosi, create an environment in which anti-capitalist, Socialist programs can prosper . . . then complain when they do!

    Reply

  3. HOW THE —- DID AMERICA GET HERE?

    With the massive invasion of America by Haitians, Mexicans, and flotsam, more and more Americans are beginning to grasp why George Washington and John Jay precluded Barack Hussein “Barry-I-Have-A-Statue-In-Jakarta Soetoro” Obama from becoming president and commander-in-chief by requiring that presidents are “natural born citizens” who have two parents who were citizens and a father who was a citizen at the time of the candidate’s birth.

    Obama was the son of an anti-Colonialist, anti-American, radical extremist activist Muslim who was jailed by the British for six months and who died after he “drove his car into a tree following a day of drinking in Nairobi.”

    “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree,” as they say.  Obama is a radical extremist activist and a Muslim who fully intends, by his own admission, to “fundamentally transform the United States of America” as soon as he concludes his Coup D’etat in America against President Trump.

    The “Dancing Snake Oil Salesman” cast his spell of “Obamacare, ‘Free Stuff,’ Etc.,” over the leeches, parasites, dependents, Moochhells, and illegal aliens who inexplicably outvote actual, patriotic Good Americans.

    Obama IS the enemy.

    Where the —- are the judicial branch and Supreme Court?
    ________________________________________________________________

    To George Washington from John Jay, 25 July 1787
    From John Jay

    New York 25 July 1787

    Dear Sir

    I was this morning honored with your Excellency’s Favor of the 22d Inst: & immediately delivered the Letter it enclosed to Commodore Jones, who being detained by Business, did not go in the french Packet, which sailed Yesterday.

    Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.

    Mrs Jay is obliged by your attention, and assures You of her perfect Esteem & Regard—with similar Sentiments the most cordial and sincere I remain Dear Sir Your faithful Friend & Servt

    John Jay

    Reply

    1. George, in those days they didn’t have “C-Sections” so everyone was a “Natural Born Citizen”.

      Reply

      1. They certainly did have Caesarean sections! How do you think they got that name in the first place?

        Also, of course, people born by Caesarian section are natural-born citizens. And so are people born in the USA to parents who are not citizens — even both of them, let alone just one.

        And 0bama is certainly a radical extremist activist, but he is not a Moslem. He was raised to be a good communist, and the only god he has ever worshiped is himself.

        Reply

        1. Obama was smiling broadly in that photo with Louis Farrakhan.

          Obama is “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

          What’s that tell you, transforming from what, to what?

          Reply

          1. So what if he’s smiling with Farrakhan? Do you seriously claim that makes him a Moslem?! Even Farrakhan isn’t a Moslem according to any actual Moslem. NOI is not Islam. It’s a weird cult that actual Moslems completely reject. And 0bama has never worshiped any god but himself. He wanted to transform the USA into a neo-Marxist sh*thole, and he may well have succeeded.

            Reply

      2. In fact, old “wise” man, every president before Obama had two parents who were citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth, as they observed and obeyed the law in a society of laws.

        Strange thing that, the law, right?

        Reply

  4. If you allow idiots to vote, you allow idiots in office.

    One-man, one-vote “democracy” IS the pink, communist “dictatorship of the proletariat (i.e. hired help).”

    Dependents, leeches, and parasites were not intended to run the country, the Constitution and Bill of Rights were to hold dominion.

    America was designed to be a restricted-vote republic under constitutional freedom.

    The pink judicial branch and Supreme Court have failed to support the clear meaning and intent of the Constitution.

    Turnout was 11.6% in 1789 and general State voter criteria were male, European, 21, 50 lbs. Sterling/50 acres.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    “the people are nothing but a great beast…

    I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value.”

    – Alexander Hamilton
    _________________________

    “The true reason (says Blackstone) of requiring any qualification, with regard to property in voters, is to exclude such persons, as are in so mean a situation, that they are esteemed to have no will of their own.”

    “If it were probable that every man would give his vote freely, and without influence of any kind, then, upon the true theory and genuine principles of liberty, every member of the community, however poor, should have a vote… But since that can hardly be expected, in persons of indigent fortunes, or such as are under the immediate dominion of others, all popular states have been obliged to establish certain qualifications, whereby, some who are suspected to have no will of their own, are excluded from voting; in order to set other individuals, whose wills may be supposed independent, more thoroughly upon a level with each other.”

    – Alexander Hamilton, The Farmer Refuted, 1775
    _______________________________________

    “[We gave you] a [restricted-vote] republic, if you can keep it.”

    – Ben Franklin, 1787

    Reply

      2. Actually, they were the American Founders who set those specific criteria for the nation they established, America.

        Do you respect and revere the American Founders?

        Not so much, how ’bout Karl Marx, is his Manifesto more to your liking?

        Reply

Leave a Reply