One of the long-standing unanswered questions from the January 6th riot has been why the Capitol was so poorly prepared and defended on that day. A newly released transcript has caused a firestorm in Washington over allegations that the J6 Committee downplayed or even suppressed evidence that former President Donald Trump personally suggested the deployment of 10,000 national guard troops to prevent violence.
The transcript also includes contradictions of major allegations that ran wild in the media. That includes the claim that Trump tried to physically grab the steering wheel of the presidential limo, “The Beast,” when Secret Service refused to take him to the Capitol. Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson was the source of the claim, which appeared in most of the media and was highlighted in her testimony. However, it appears that the J6 Committee had testimony of secret service agents directly contradicting that account, including the driver.
However, it is the National Guard question that is more weighty for historical purposes.
Trump has long claimed that he proposed the deployment of the National Guard troops (as was done previously at the White House during violent protests). The January 6th Committee said that was a lie.
The release of the transcript by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R., Ga.) triggered attacks on the J6 Committee. The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway wrote a column titled “Former Rep. Liz Cheney’s January 6 Committee suppressed evidence.”
That triggered an angry response from former co-chair Liz Cheney which led to an even angrier reply from commentator Mark Levin.
The anger is nothing new in a J6 investigation that seemed to produce more heat than light. Cheney’s spokesperson called the Federalist report “flatly false” and added “no transcripts were destroyed” while acknowledging that some material was not published “to allow the Secret Service to protect sensitive security information for interviews of its agents before preserving that testimony in the archives.”
The issue of the suppression or destruction of the evidence has drawn a lot of attention, but the more troubling question is the fact that such an offer was made and declined.
The Committee found “no evidence” that the Trump administration called for 10,000 National Guard members to Washington, D.C., to protect the Capitol.
That now stands contradicted and the question is whether Cheney or other members knew the public was being misled on the question. For example, the Washington Post “debunked” Trump’s comments with an award of “Four Pinocchios.”
The Post’s Glenn Kessler admitted that Trump raised the issue but noted that he might have been suggesting the troops “not because he wanted to protect the Capitol,” but to suggest that he and his supporters were being threatened. He added that “Trump brought up the issue on at least three occasions but in such vague and obtuse ways that no senior official regarded his words as an order.”
However, the issue is not whether Trump issued “an order” but made an offer that was declined. For those of us who were covering the event on that day, the question has always been prominent in our minds. I was critical of Trump’s speech while he was still giving it. However, before the Capitol was breached, I also noted that I had never seen the Capitol so thinly protected in a major protest.
We had just seen violent protests outside of the White House with a large number of police officers injured and extensive property damage, including arson. President Trump and his family had to be moved to a secure location out of concern of an imminent breach of the White House. National Guard were deployed and fencing installed.
Even without an offer, it remains unclear why the violence around the White House did not prompt Congress to install the same barriers and deploy the same troops. (They ultimately took both steps but only after the rioters gained entry into the Capitol).
Moreover, if an offer was clearly made, it undermines the allegations that Trump was actively seeking an insurrection. While he has never been charged with an insurrection or even incitement, that allegation was used more recently to support his disqualification from the ballots in Colorado, Maine, and Illinois.
The transcript contains the testimony of former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s interview on January 2022 with Cheney present. Ornato states that he clearly recalled the offer of 10,000 troops being made by Trump in a conversation with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser:
“I was there, and he was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed. Because I think it was the concern of anti and pro groups clashing is what I recall…I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, the President wants to make sure that you have enough. You know, he is willing to ask for 10,000. I remember that number.”
Ornato said that Browser said that they would not need the troops. (She ultimately asked for only 300 troops). There are also reports that then Speaker Nancy Pelosi was worried about the “optics” of military reinforcements at the Capitol.
Ornato also said that he recalled that, after Bowser refused additional National Guard members, the White House requested the Defense Department have a “quick reaction force” ready on that day. He gave details on meetings with the Defense Department and follow up from Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
Hemingway noted in her report that Ornato’s testimony was supported by former Trump administration aide Kash Patel. Cheney has attacked Patel as unreliable.
Ornato also testified that Meadows and others were frustrated by the delay in getting those troops to the Hill. The delay was blamed on the logistics, not some conspiracy to enable or facilitate an insurrection.
The Federalist article makes additional allegations, including that Cheney was behind an op-ed by her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, opposing any use of national guard troops on January 6th.
However, even proving such duplicity would hardly be news for Washington. Likewise, it does not negate criticism over Trump’s comments on that day or his delay in publicly calling for supporters to withdraw.
Yet, again, what is more important historically is whether the J6 Committee had direct evidence that Trump made the offer of thousands of troops and that the White House pushed for rapid deployment troops on that day.
I have previously criticized the one-sided J6 Report and the biased framing of the hearings held by the members. The Committee could have been so much more than the echo chamber that it became. However, this latest transcript adds questions over the perplexing failure of Congress to take obvious steps to prevent a riot.
Had Congress simply installed the same fencing previously used at the White House and deployed such troops, the J6 riot would likely have never occurred. Given the cost and trauma to our nation, we should want to know the full story of what occurred on January 6th.
Liz Cheney, like her father, present themselves as the Right side of the Right side. What they are is GOPe. The DC establishment, with the Dems
Once you see that. it is impossible to miss the motivations for their actions.
We have had some huge revelations of how Washington DC operates. Those revelation come courtesey of President Donald J Trump.
Obama’s politicization of Executive Branch Agencies. Including the DoJ/FBI
Now we have proof Obama/Biden led Brenen at the CIA to spy on the Presidential Campaign of DJTrump
All the Russia hoax was planned and operated from the White House. Biden was a full partner with Obama, who is the First ex President to retain an Office in Washington DC
Covid.
Covid exposed the politicized CDC. Ignoring centuries of protocols to address a respiratory virus, the CDC trotted out dozens of procedures that were meaningless at best, harmful at worst. Foisted a worthless mRNA treatment on the world that did not stop contracting the virus, nor prevent the spread of the virus.
Ukraine.
Are we at $50 billion of weapons to Ukraine? For what? How was a vastly out manned Ukraine ever going to defeat Russia? Simple back of the envelope math shows it is IMPOSSIBLE for Ukraine to prevail
But it has shored up the Industrial Military Complex. It’s gas tank running on empty following 4 years of Trump refusing to engage in foreign military excursions.
All of this was exposed by President Trump.
Now its is easy to see why Liz Cheney set out to use her power, in an attempt to destroy Trump. Trump is a real danger to the massive grift that is Washingtion DC
Iowan2,
Wells and great comment!
iowan2 said: “covid/mrna vaccine”
How can you claim that Trump exposed the errors (if those were considered such by the likes of Fauci) of the CDC regarding the mRNA vaccines? Just in this past week, Trump has bragged about how he expedited the program to develop and administer the vaccine, and then, when challenged about whether that was actually beneficial, doubled down on that claim.
Trump is running for office. This is campaign speak. Not a White Paper written by a staffer with a masters in PolySci
It is true Trump swept away normal protocols. In essence, a vaccine takes about 4 phases, to get to human use. Each phase must be completed and and validated, before the next phase is allowed to start. Trump swept away that process for the ability to run the four processes simultaneously. Understand that the geeks have been playing with mRNA vaccines for years, but never got good efficacy, and never got past limited human trials. Covid changed all that. You have to remember Trump is not a politician. He is a builder. A creator. Driven by a goal and end product, and in Real estate development, Time is Literally, Money. So he asked (I’m guessing) Why to vaccines take so long? getting an explanation, he set out to remove barriers.
Now Trump has the left in a corner. The left can attack the vaccine as useless, and blame Trump, But Trump only got the results the People wanted, and the EXPERTS were more the willing to provide under the accelerated protocol made possible by Trump.
Your question asks, is the President supposed to blindly follow the experts, or is President Trump, a Real Estate Developer, going to question the experts in the creation of vaccines?
The viability of vaccine is irrelevant to the speed at which it was developed
Clearly it was a set up from the beginning.
The Communist Party has no intention of giving up power.
Will the DNC Convention be more violent than 68?
Will we have an election?
Will the Republic fall in 2025?
Tin soldiers and the radicals r coming. It was wonderful when the hippy dippies tore down America. They were merely being civil disobedients. When conservatives get pushed too far, suddenly they are thugs.
lefties always want it both ways.
I want big tush Willis to prosecute Hillbilly for deleting 5 million emails in 3 seconds. Come on big fanny!
“Will the DNC Convention be more violent than 68?”
I certainly hope so! With all the pro-Palestinians, this could be a riot of epic proportions! Bazookas, flamethrowers, Molotov cocktails, Panzerfausts, AK-47s, glocks, hammers, pickaxes, those little spiky things the Kali Thugees used, and billy clubs, billie clubs (for the women), nerve gas, shurikens, kamikaze transfolk with bomb vests, and rocks and bottles! Hopefully, they can use footage of this in the next Purge installment! I am going to lay in some popcorn for all that!
Floyd,
Okay, I had to LOL at the, “I am going to lay in some popcorn for all that!”
Dang! Thank you for the laugh!
I am glad you enjoyed it!
Jonathan
Would you like to hazard a guess as to the means that the white house is using to create the Jacked Up Joe that we saw at the SOTU address?
Over the weekend, it was right back to Sleepy Demented Joe, in stark contrast, and with the accustomed gaffes, misspeaks, and confusion. There is no longer a question as whether, but by what means?
“Send me to Congress”
“we cut the deficit and we added more to the national debt than any president in his term in all of history,”
Biden mistakenly referred to the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riots as taking place on “July 6th,”
“We made a mistake by going into Ukraine”
ALL of this AFTER the MSM fell all over themselves praising what was an obvious Biden jacked up by some means. It had the side affect of making him loud and angry, although the characteristic mumbling and slurring were still there as well.
We are truly witnessing the Manchurian candidate.
Regarding Jack’d Up Joe…cocaine, perhaps?
https://youtu.be/h7AAuf0xO58?t=320
Jeff,
Well said.
As others have noted, it was NOT a SOTU speech. It was a campaign speech. More like a loud, angry, rant.
And the the next following days, we saw the regular, bumbling, slurring, messing up dates milqutoast supposed president who refused to take questions from the media, while the Biden admin forced them out.
Can you imagine another four years of that, but even worse as his mental decline accelerates?
Who is actually in charge over there at the WH?
It is clearly not Biden.
If Liz Chaney says it’s a lie then you know it’s the truth!!
The insistence by the WokeTrolls in their comments here on details regarding whether there were 10,000 troops available, and/or the legal procedure for requesting those troops, shows that they are desperate, and have absolutely nothing to counter this evidence that the traitorous Cheneys, along with their toadies on the J6 committee, lied in the committee report with the express intention of making a second Trump presidency completely unacceptable to the public, and of incarcerating Trump, if possible, to further ensure he could never run again. If the details they are clinging to are so important., why wouldn’t those details have been alluded to in the committee report? Because the entire purpose of mentioning a National Guard call-up in that report was to deny that Trump had any intention of aiding control of a demonstration that became a riot. The committee members very much wanted to portray that riot as an insurrection that was a creature of Trump’s making. In fact, the riot was deliberately instigated and inflamed by those very members and their allies.
Number 6,
Well said.
Suddenly, this new evidence is not relevant or hearsay. The fact the Jan6th Committee covered it up, we are to believe that too is not relevant.
It is.
Shows the character, intent and shows the degree of how much of a clown show the Jan6th Committee really was.
Brings to mind Ben Franklin, “Half a truth is often a great lie.”
The above comment was mistakenly marked by the system as spam: Restored.
Charges against Trump include his participation in attempts to use “fake electors” to undo the election. While some of his critics are quick to point this out, they conveniently forget that their party did this three times in our modern history. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 allows for members of congress to challenge electoral votes. In 2001, Rep. Maxine Waters tried to challenge the certification of electoral votes for GW Bush. In 2017, when Biden was VPOTUS, Rep. Pramila Jayapal tried to challenge Trump’s election. It was Biden, as presiding president of the Senate, who told her to forget about it. In 2005, members of both Houses tried formally to challenge Bush’s election to POTUS. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Senator Barbara Boxer of CA filed objections. They were unable to muster enough votes from their colleagues to prevail. Thus, the “fake electors” charge is a canard by the left to besmirch Trump. Some of these self-righteous guardians of democracy should study history a bit more before sounding off.
Trump organized for Republicans to forge documents saying they were the official electors and submitted those documents to the National Archives as if they were real, then demanded that Pence count them. They even attempted to hand the fake EC votes to the VP. There is illegal under federal law and is in no way similar to a Congressperson symbolically objecting to EC votes. This act alone in enough to send Trump to prison.
Sammy: I think you should read the actual indictment. Here is the pertinent part of that indictment: “The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6.” Many of these “facts” are contested by Trump and his codefendants. In addition, the Supreme Court has yet to rule on whether the POTUS has immunity for official acts performed while POTUS. One such act would be to ensure the integrity of the nation’s electoral system. A good part of this indictment rests simply on political grounds as no such criminal charges were ever suggested or brought in prior cases when electors were questioned. That the Electoral Count Act of 1887 has been amended twice since the 2020 election is a testament to its insufficiency to resolve some of these speculative charges. Sorry for the lengthy reply but I don’t think this situation is as cut and dry as you seem to believe.
What you quoted backs up what I said. Also there is no way that organizing a fake elector scheme is ensuring the integrity of the electoral system. SCOTUS won’t give Trump immunity. An so far there has never been a fake elector scheme like this. The closest was Hawaii in 1960 and that was done above board because the results were legitimately unresolved, and only one was submitted to be counted. This is not about “questioning” the election. This is about disregarding it and trying to install an unelected president.
Sammy: Trump’s four-count indictment accuses him of conspiracy (two counts) and fraud (two counts). the actual statutory violations are: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371, (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States), Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding); Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding); and Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights). These are interrelated charges and the Supreme Court in USA v. Fischer currently is examining whether the use of Count 3 in this indictment is applicable law. That provision in the statute (§ 1512(k)) was enacted as the “Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, after the Enron-Arthur Andersen case in 2001. It was intended to address “Tampering with a record or otherwise impending an official proceeding.” The absence of specificity in the charging documents reveals just how weak this case is on the law and how strong it is on politics. No matter how much one stretches a ham sandwich it never will be a T-bone steak!
JJC,
Thank you for your lawyer analysis and commentary to correct Sammy’s shallow attempts to interpret the law.
It’s always different when Democrats do it because reasons.
“However, even proving such duplicity would hardly be news for Washington.”
If ever there was a case for the fallen state and the sinfulness of mankind, the past few years is evidence enough and Washington D.C. is the place.
The J6 committee was a pretentious echo chamber with a desire to become a Star Chamber. It was never designed to be anything else. It was Pelosi’s abortion and she recruited 2 useful idiots from the Republican Party (there are always a few around ready to turn their coats, it is D.C. after all) in order to give useful life to her abortion products. The House and Senate leaders knew the demonstration was coming and made the best (or worst) of it.
Liz Cheney-She is still trying to breathe life into the products of her dead career. She saw a clear pathway to the presidency for herself and never forgave Trump for upsetting the literal applecart and changing the Republican Party to something where she has no place. She is like Benedict Arnold-despised by both sides with a home in neither. She should crawl off into some dark space and catch and eat vermin. She has already become Renfield to Pelosi’s Dracula.
GEB, why is it that there is always “a few Republicans around ready to turn their coats” and there are never a few Democrats willing to do the same? What is it about the Republican party that they can never garner the same 100% support that the brain dead Democrats have. Oops, never mind, I answered my own question. The Democrats are brain dead.
You said, “She has already become Renfield to Pelosi’s Dracula.”
That is the perfect characterization of Liz Chicanery, and Kinzinger too! KUDOS!!!
Odd that Pelosi had her daughter there filming a “documentary” while everyone else was in “mortal danger”.
Pelosi ripping up Trump’s SOTU speech is a metaphor for her ugly reign as Speaker.
What’s so frustrating about this is that there are many documents to support Patel’s testimony. Recommend everyone review, including Professor Turley, to see that Patel brought receipts to prove his claims:
DoD Timeline:
https://www.scribd.com/document/582682043/January-6-Timeline
DoD IG Report:
https://www.scribd.com/document/617824831/Exhibit-DOD-IG-Report
USCP Timeline:
scribd.com/document/617824269/Exhibit-Capitol-Police-Timeline
Mayor Bowser Refusal Letter:
scribd.com/document/582684364/Bowser-Letter
Secretary of the ANG Columbia:
scribd.com/document/583504916/Secretary-of-the-Army-National-Guard-Columbia-Memo
Granny62,
You might not have been aware but this web log only permits two or fewer hyperlinks per comment. I edited the above comment so that it would post. If in the future you would like to contribute more than two links, this can be done through multiple comments having two or fewer links per each.
This information is not relevant. The J6 attack was only one part of his attempted coup. The more important parts were the fake electors, the pressure on local officials to ignore vote tallies and declare him the winner, and demanding that Mike Pence throw out Biden votes.
Also think about this for a minute. If the troops were there, then Trump would have been telling his supporters to march right into a wall of armed soldiers. That would not have ended well either. Or maybe Trump wanted to sacrifice some of his supporters that day.
Wow! The ultimate conspiracy theory revealed! Thank you Sammy!
PS. Sammy, have you had a chance to read the Espionage Act yet?
No, dear, his calling for the 10,000 troops to protect the capitol negates the “attempted coup” theory.
The attempted coup was already in progress before the attack on the capital even happened.
There was no attempted coup. Your lie that you have to cling to is falling apart. Everyone sees it but you.
Where are those “attempted coup” charges being filed that substantiate your conspiracy theory, eh Sammy?
Sorry Sammy. This information is relevant to how the Jan6th Committee attempted to hide evidence that would contradict their narrative and yours.
That is some pretty heavy Blue-anon conspiracy theory you now have to spin in light of the recent evidence.
Upstate for the win!!
Not relevant? Even if “The J6 attack was only one part”, it is still relevant. I think when you say relevant you mean supportive of your position.
“Not relevant” as in it is a minor detail that does not change anything.
It is relevant.
It is evidence of how much the Jan6th Committee was a sham. A political clown show. So much so, they had to hire a Hollywood producer to try to sell their false narrative to the American public.
Normal people used their common sense, logic, reason and saw right through it for what it was. A sham.
Now, this new evidence of the attempted cover up by the Jan6th Committee proves what all us normal people suspected all the long. The Jan6th Committee was a sham.
Who is this guy, Sammy?
I have seen several posts by him, but he never makes any sense. Can someone interpret?
Terminal case of TDS, I’m sure he has no issues with 10+ million illegals, 2-3 trillion dollar deficits, funding foreign wars and prosecuting political opponents
Jeff said: “Who is this guy, Sammy?”
Typical left/prog/woke/libtard troll, made a home for himself here a week or two ago. Possibly paid for his efforts, although anyone would have to be exceedingly stupid to pay for his pathetic efforts, which consist mostly of stringin buzzwords together into incoherent sentence structure.
Actually, Sammy has been here for a long period of time that is punctuated by apparent absences.
Number 6,
Sammy has been around for some time.
Paid? Not so sure. Seems more like a cultist zealot, just repeating DNC talking points or what MSNBC tells him to think.
So devoted to the DNC, has to repeat the MSM slant as if it were reality while all the evidence coming to light destroys his narrative. As in true cult fashion, he has to cling to the lies, else admitting the truth of the facts would destroy his alternative, cult like, reality.
Seems as of late, a number of leftists suddenly have mind reading super powers to declare evidence of what Trump or other think or meant.
The Electoral Count Act of 1887 allows for members of congress to challenge electoral votes. In 2001, Rep. Maxine Waters tried to challenge the certification of electoral votes for GW Bush. In 2017, when Biden was VPOTUS, Rep. Pramila Jayapal tried to challenge Trump’s election. It was Biden, as presiding president of the Senate, who told her to forget about it. In 2005, members of both Houses tried formally to challenge Bush’s election to POTUS. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Senator Barbara Boxer of CA filed objections. They were unable to muster enough votes from their colleagues to prevail. Thus, the “fake electors” charge is a canard by the left to besmirch Trump. Some of these self-righteous guardians of democracy should study history a bit more before sounding off.
Sammy – are you really Nancy Pelosi?
Many of us have known this for some time, and many of us refused to even dignify the dog and pony show that was the dems’ ‘hearings’. The final years of Pelosi’s Speakership are a stain on this nation, I’ve never seen such hatred and malfeasance in my lifetime. The DNC has done a spectacular job of fracturing our society with their madness. It remains to be seen if we can recover.
Trump is absolutely the blowhard everyone says he is, the right does have some dumb ideas and will continue to turn people off with their insistence on certain dogmas, but fascism and criminality are the province of the modern left, and it’s killing us.
Liz Cheney: The prototypical Benedict Arnold that would even have old Benny Arnold blushing. The exact type of activity you can expect when someone is in over their head.
And who’s father has the blood of THOUSANDS of Americans on his hands.
I need a hint. If I included the key search items Halliburton, ‘WMDs’ and Riviera, Texas would I be getting warm?
Touché, Ex Dem
The violent left-wing radicals who attacked the democrat national convention, among other places, during the hippy peace/love movement.
The Committee found “no evidence” that the Trump administration called for 10,000 National Guard members to Washington, D.C., to protect the Capitol.
I knew this was always a lie. “no evidence” is the qualifying language used when lying.
My understanding is the President cannot call out the NG. The President can only approve a request from the governor.
Often I saw in “reporting” that no request is on file. Of course not. There is no process for the President to request NG. Thats the tell. Now we have testimony that proves President Trump had never considered, never mind planned and executed a violent insurrection.
the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
Thanks for verifying my memory
can’t read, either. come back when truth and facts achieve some importance 2 u, FOOL
If we don’t correct communist leftist’s America haters, they go on 4ever lying. If we take the time to correct them, we have no time left for anything else. Knowing this, they revel in bull.
Sund, “not a conspiracy theorist” but said it was concerning the way the January 6 attack played out. Sund explained that he was denied National Guard service in advance of the attack and was denied access to National Guard troops for 71 minutes during the attack.
smug boob u b
Thanks Wade.
I had forgotten about Sund
His testimony is not hearsay either
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says.”
Thank you for bringing up Sund’s book. I read it, and was much impressed and persuaded by it. …but it was a library copy, not on my shelf, and I couldn’t recollect the specifics of that portion of it.
I am so frustrated by this whole discussion. Because of this, I am asking Professor Turley and those who read this to review a few publicly available documents. Cheney can try to cast suspicion on Kash Patel, who served as Assistant to Acting SecDef Christopher Miller on J6 and fave sworn testimony under penalty of perjury (if which he was NEVER accused, btw,) but HE BROUGHT THESE RECEIPTS:
J6 Source Material:
https://www.scribd.com/document/581427714/DOD-Inspector-General-J6
Capitol Riots Timeline:
https://www.scribd.com/document/582588496/503025581-Capitol-Riots-DoD-Timeline
CP Chief Sund’s Letter to Speaker Pelosi et al:
scribd.com/document/493789364/Former-Capitol-Police-Chief-s-Letter-to-Nancy-Pelosi-Other-Congressional-Leaders
scribd.com/document/581427714/DOD-Inspector-General-J6
DC Mayor Bowser’s Letter of Refusal for National Guard Assurance:
scribd.com/document/582684364/Bowser-Letter
Secretary of the Army National Guard Columbia Memo
fightwithkash.com/articles/secretary-of-the-army-national-guard-columbia-memo
Will we ever have a House and/or Senate we can trust again? I guess the 250 year experiment expiration date is at hand.
Cheney is part of the “Deep State” who wants to apologize to a murderer for calling him an illegal.
J6 has caused more harm to an already fractured nation, as can be evidenced by the rift that it caused between family members and myself. I am one of very few conservatives in a very left family and we already had “no fly” zones in what we would converse about. We were having a harmless group text when J6 occurred and immediately one of the family texted “How can anyone support Trump at this point” to which I replied to please be removed from the group text. My brother and I have barely spoken since then, along with cousins whom I seldom spoke to anyway- now zilch. Our media should be absolutely ashamed of themselves, and instead carry their bias like a badge of honor. It is truly despicable.
J6DNC/MSM has caused more harm to an already fractured nation….FTFY
Punishment of Treason
ARTICLE III, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 2
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Under English common law, punishment for treason generally included drawing, hanging, beheading, and quartering. As with other crimes carrying sentence of death, those adjudged guilty of treason and finally sentenced were considered attaint, or stained, meaning dead in the eyes of the law—even before execution.
https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/3/essays/120/punishment-of-treason
It appears DNC MSM have a long list of innocents whom they declared, without evidence, “dead in the eyes of the law”. In response Republicans in Congress have rattled their wing-tipped leather Florsheim shoes and nothing else. Our country is led by a chorus of Benedict Arnolds
I hate to “like” that because I feel your situation—my sister and I have the same issue. Many people have lost friends/family over this lack of an honest investigation.
The older I get the more I feel no one can trust Dems; they’ve become radicalized-Communists?
Dick Cheney owes us an apology.
He needs to put his Stetson back on, go on TV and say he was very sorry about what he said about President Trump. He also needs to say that his daughter, Liz, a sewer rat, suppressed evidence in a congressional investigation in an effort to undermine our government.