Harvard and Columbia Rank as Worst Colleges for Free Speech in Annual Survey

For the second year in a row, Harvard University is ranked dead last among universities and colleges on the annual survey of free speech on campuses by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). Harvard shares a score of 0.00 with Columbia University. They are followed by New York University, University of Pennsylvania and Barnard College.

In my book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I discuss free speech on campuses and note that public universities could prove the last line of defense for this right. It is not that faculty members are necessarily any more protective of free speech or intellectual diversity at these schools. However, they are directly subject to the First Amendment as state schools and thus can be taken to court more readily for denials of the right.

Conversely, at schools like Harvard, Columbia, Penn, and NYU, the faculty appears unconcerned about their dismal records on free speech. There is still a growing anti-free speech movement on our campuses. It is notable that these schools also have largely purged conservative and Republican faculty from their ranks. A past survey found that over 75 percent of faculty identify as liberal or very liberal. Another survey found that many departments do not have a single Republican.

I was disappointed that my alma mater University of Chicago has fallen from number 1 to 44, though it still gets a shout out from FIRE as being a consistently strong free speech environment. The concerning fall has occurred under with the presidency of Armand Paul Alivisatos. He replaced one of the greatest advocates of free speech in academia, the late Robert Zimmer.

My proudest moment came when Zimmer sent a famous letter to the class of 2020. The letter warned students that they will not be shielded from views that upset them or given “safe spaces” on campus.

In the letter, the university declared that “our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

It was a moment of clarity that is missing in today’s environment of speech codes, microaggressions, and cancel campaigns.

When Zimmer stepped down in 2021, there was a virtual panic in the free speech community. He was our champion and placed one of the premier academic institutions in the world on the side of free speech.

Notably, Barnard College (unlike the other schools at the bottom) has joined other schools in adopting the Chicago Principles. It released a statement committing itself to a new course. We will have to wait to see if faculty will honor such a commitment.

George Washington University, where I teach, is 161st out of 251 schools with a below average ranking.

What was surprising this year were the schools receiving a “warning” about anti-free speech policies.  They include Pepperdine University, Hillsdale College, and Brigham Young University. FIRE found that all “have policies that clearly and consistently state” that they prioritize “other values over a commitment to freedom of speech.” The President of Hillsdale responded in this column.

If there will be substantial improvements in the anti-free speech environment in higher education in private colleges, they will only come from donors refusing to support these schools until they change their policies and culture. Administrators and faculty feel little pressure to reverse these trends. However, they will respond if their intolerance begins to threaten their own budgets and departments.

Higher education has already plunged in trust among citizens under the current administrators and faculty at our colleges and universities. They are destroying the very institutions that sustain them.

In the meantime, public universities can be a strong line of defense for free speech, offering students not just free speech environments but the direct protection of the First Amendment. What is missing is greater diversity of viewpoints on faculties. I have written about how taxpayers and legislators can exercise their own power to demand more diversified and tolerant environments at these schools.

While some professors have argued that free speech and intellectual diversity are not essential to higher education, most of the public disagrees and has a right to expect a diverse and tolerant environment at state-supported schools.

In my book and past congressional testimony, I have also encouraged Congress to adopt ten basic prerequisites for federal funding for colleges and universities on free speech. If these schools want to continue to deny free speech to students and faculty, they should do so with their own funds and contributions from donors who share their anti-free speech agendas. Taxpayers should not be supporting schools which deny a right considered “indispensable” to our constitution and culture.

You can see the full rankings here.

200 thoughts on “Harvard and Columbia Rank as Worst Colleges for Free Speech in Annual Survey”

  1. “We will have to wait to see if faculty will honor such a commitment.”

    Why should the lunatics be charge of the asylum? Is it that way at all colleges and universities?

  2. Hillsdale College president stated on the school’s website:

    Arnn argued complete free speech is not required to pursue things aligned with Hillsdale’s purposes.

    https://hillsdalecollegian.com/2023/11/arnn-responds-to-fires-free-speech-warning-label/

    Hillsdale was founded by the, wait for it, “Free Will Baptists” who has its roots in protesting the Catholic Church in the Protestant Reformation! Whats more, they believe in “sola scriptura”

    Pffft. They’re as authentic to the Early Church as Reformed Jews are to Orthodox Judaism. Well done “hipócritas”.

    The only option our gutless, leaderless world has is unhindered evolutionary forces. Bring it on to spare us the spectacle we currently endure.

    1. @Estovir: Hillsdale provides a good education. They also offer a free classroom on many subjects provided by streaming or with a donation a CD. They are good people. They are not gutless remaining one of the few colleges that take no money from the government.

        1. Hillsdale pays no taxes. Sounds gutless to me.

          Planned Parenthood, a funding arm of the Soviet Democrats ALSO pays no taxes. That sound gutless to you as well? Or is Planned Parenthood approved as Democrat Demon Different?

          Do you know the difference between the two? Asking, because this sounds like another vicious little cowardly Anonymous communist that lies by not telling the whole story.

          Hillsdale college is a 501(c)(3) non-profit entity that takes NO taxpayer money from taxpayers at any level – and thus at the end of the year after expenses versus income are calculated, they do indeed not pay any taxes.

          Planned Parenthood is also a 501(c)(3) – one who overwhelmingly gets their hundreds of millions of dollars of funding from Soviet Democrat politicians attaching earmarks to spending bills. That would be the same Planned Parenthood that then directs tens of millions of those dollars back to Soviet Democrat election campaigns to pay the Soviet Democrat party back for the hundreds of millions they gave them. Which is exactly what they’re busy spending tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars on right now: spending on Soviet Democrat election campaigns.

          Can you figure the rest of it out for yourself, Skippy? Can you figure out how much Hillsdale contributes to political parties without receiving any taxpayer funding – versus how much Planned Parenthood contributes to political parties from the taxpayer hundreds of millions of dollars they receive?

          They’re both gutless 501(c)3 non profits, after all…

          This is why the Soviet Democrat’s cowardly Anonymous liars are accurately called “Marxist Useful Idiots”.

        2. “Hillsdale pays no taxes. Sounds gutless to me.”

          Stupidity is a condition, and ignorance is a choice. You can choose which applies, though most on the blog believe you are stupid forever.

          Harvard receives money from the government and pays no taxes. You sound neutered to me.

        3. Harvard university pays no taxes on its endowment. Its money is in long term investments. Trump wants to tax it if it is not used for the betterment of the university or help with tuition for the students.

  3. What in the world is a “natural born citizen?” 
    __________________________________________________

    Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5

    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    1. Ok, so you can be born usa for one day and leave. Return age 21 and run for office of president. Got it!

  4. Jonathan: Now getting back to your column (9/3) claiming the “X is the main source of news for Brazilians”. A look at how Brazilians get their news since X was banned demonstrates your claim is FALSE.

    Take Bluesky. Before the ban it had about 6.2 million global users. Suddenly it has another 2 million signups in Brazil. Meta’s Threads has also seen a large influx of Brazilian users (See Fortune article from yesterday). So Brazilians are not finding it difficult to find other sources for their news–despite the ban on X.

    Now Musk thinks he is a law and government unto himself. In a post Musk shouted: “Unless the Brazilian government returns the illegally [?] seized property of X and Space X, we will seek reciprocal seizure of government [Brazil] assets too. Hope [Lula da Silva] enjoys flying commercial”.

    Musk is alluding to the US seizure of Venezuela President Madura’s plane. But Maduro is already under US sanctions. Brazil is not. So how Musk expects the US to seize Lula’s plane is a mystery. Maybe Musk expects DJT will win the election and will put him in charge of going after Brazil to get back his assets. Musk is whistling past the graveyard on that one!

    Musk is finding out he can’t flout the laws of other countries without consequences. In the same Fortune article it quotes the popular Brazilian YouTuber as saying: “I must confess that I’m (truly) rooting for Elon Musk not to comply with the court orders and for Twitter to remain offline. Neto’s “shiny” new Bluesky account has 150,000 followers!

    1. Jonathan: Now getting back to your column (9/3) claiming the “X is the main source of news for Brazilians”.

      Breaking news Dennis! BREAKING!!! The junior partner in the Biden White House Crime LLC cartel just changed his plea to “Guilty” hours before his trial for income tax fraud could no longer be delayed by the Biden DoJ until after the election!

      https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/hunter-biden-expected-plead-guilty-federal-tax-case-abrupt-reversal-report

      Dennis, your employers must have told you about this by now! Dennis… you’re The Big Guy when it comes to posting “Breaking News”… why are you trying to hide this from your dear best friend Jonathan? And instead, now desperately deflecting to your fellow communist now running Brazil doing Soviet Democrat lawfare towards Elon Musk?

      Where do you think your fellow Marxist Brother From Another Commie Mother learned lawfare, Dennis?

  5. Harvard, Columbia, Penn, NYU et al. are the U.S. propaganda/indoctrination education centers of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of the United Nations of Global Communism (UNGC).

    These so-called “institutions of higher learning” are “bought and paid for” by communist money.

    When the veil is lifted and the charade is up at the point where China is finally acknowledged and certified to be the enemy of freedom, the Constitution, and America that it is, the activities of these American institutions will be enforced against as treason. 
    ________________________________________________________________________

    Article 3, Section 3

    Treason against the United States, shall consist…in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

  6. So Turley, now that it’s out that kremlin funds have been supporting right-wing pro-MAGA sites to influence the 2024 election, are you going to write about how Putin’s free speech is being taken away.

    1. Fish– “now that it’s out that kremlin funds have been supporting right-wing pro-MAGA sites”

      That’s from the DOJ. Nobody believes what those corruptocrats say. if ‘Russian’ money is going to conservative sites it’s likely DOJ cash disguised as Russian to make an issue. Remember the Whitmer kidnapping and the J6 ‘Pipe Bomb”.

        1. Good luck with your battle from reality.

          Reality mental health issues might be hoping the Soviet Democrat Memory Hole will make Americans forget that the previous Attorney General and FBI promoted and advanced the Soviet Democrats felony-ridden “Russia Dossier”.

          A criminal endeavor where they went so far in their police state fascism that they followed the president’s orders that the then Attorney General and FBI Director go perjure themselves to FISA courts to get illegal counterespionage warrants to use in order to rig the election. Does your fantasy Soviet Democrat world reject that reality?

          BTW… given your usual obsession with off topic legal news, any comment on the breaking news that The First Gun Felon Son has just suddenly changed his plea to “Guilty” just hours before his trial began?

          Any concerns that Merrick Garland will demand that the junior partner in Biden White House Crime LLC rat out the senior partner in that White House crime cartel in order to get a slap on the wrist sentence?

          Or are you confident that Merrick Garland doesn’t want to know anything about who “The Big Guy” is?

          You’re confident, because The Big Guy may be too demented to even know he’s still president – but he and his family sure do know where all Obama’s skeletons are buried, Clinton’s skeletons are buried, Pelosi’s skeletons are buried, Schumer’s skeletons are buried, etc?

        2. Fishdip
          So how do you feel about Walz Chicom connections? What are your thoughts on the millions that the Biden family has received from the Chicoms evading taxes? It’s a global market place now thanks to the puppet masters, money comes from everywhere and anywhere. Is there any evidence of a directive having been provided to the two podcasters? Let me answer that for you, No. Both sides are whores, they take money from anyone.

    2. Fishstick, Putin endorsed Biden. And now, Putin says he wants Harris to win. Last week a Kremlin spokes person said Russia preferred Harris over Trump because she was a more predictable opponent.

        1. Fishstick, for once in your life try a little critical thinking. Who benefits most from a weak Harris admin? All our enemies. Russia, China, Iran, Hamas, all the drug cartels on the Southern border. Of course they are going to endorse Harris to take advantage of her weak admin, just as they did with the weak Biden admin.

          1. Upstate: you should read the new book by H.R. McMaster before you call Harris “weak”. Harris was a tough courtroom prosecutor and Attorney General who not only took on drug dealers and won, but took on banks that cheated customers–and won several millions for California citizens. You confuse the lip-biting and fist-pumping as proof of strength. In fact, Trump is weak–flattery will get you anything you want from him. Here’s a snippet from the piece from CNN, 8/26/24, entitled “General McMaster’s Blistering Account of the Trump White House”:

            “In addition to being a highly decorated officer, McMaster also has a doctorate in history. His first book, “Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam,” recounted the dismal history of how the top American generals told President Lyndon Johnson only what they thought he wanted to hear about the Vietnam War, rather than giving him their best military advice about how the conflict was going and the full range of policy options that were open to their commander in chief.

            McMaster wasn’t going to make the same mistake after Trump tapped him to be his national security adviser in February 2017. He writes, “I knew that to fulfill my duty, I would have to tell Trump what he didn’t want to hear.” This helps explain why McMaster lasted just over a year in the job. (Disclosure: I have known McMaster professionally since 2010, when he ran an anti-corruption task force in Afghanistan.)

            One subject was particularly neuralgic for Trump: Russia. McMaster astutely observes, “I wished that Trump could separate the issue of Russian election meddling from the legitimacy of his presidency. He could have said, ‘Yes, they attacked the election. But Russia doesn’t care who wins our elections. What they want to do is pit Americans against one another… .’ McMaster writes that the “fragility” of Trump’s ego and “his deep sense of aggrievement” would never allow him to make this kind of distinction.

            McMaster felt it was his “duty” to point out to Trump that Russian President Vladimir Putin “was not and would never be Trump’s friend.” McMaster warned Trump that Putin is “the best liar in the world” and would try to “play” Trump to get what he wanted and manipulate him with “ambiguous promises of a ‘better relationship.’”

            The final straw that ended McMaster’s tenure in the White House seems to have been when he publicly said on February 17, 2018, at the Munich Security Forum — the annual gathering of top Western foreign policy officials — that the indictment of a group of Russian intelligence officers for their interference in the 2016 US presidential election was “incontrovertible” evidence of Russian meddling in that election.

            Trump soon tweeted, “General McMaster forgot to say that the results of the 2016 election were not impacted or changed by the Russians….” Once the commander-in-chief started publicly castigating him on Twitter, it was obvious that McMaster would not be long for the White House.

            McMaster’s account of the Trump team is not pretty. Steve Bannon, Trump’s “chief strategist” early in the presidency, is portrayed as a “fawning court jester” who played “on Trump’s anxiety and sense of beleaguerment … with stories, mainly about who was out to get him and what he could do to ‘counterpunch.’”

            Meanwhile, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense James Mattis were often at odds with Trump, McMaster says. Tillerson, who had previously run Exxon, is portrayed as inaccessible to top officials in Trump’s administration, while Mattis is described as an obstructionist. McMaster writes that Tillerson and Mattis viewed Trump as “dangerous” and seemed to construe their roles as if “Trump was an emergency and that anyone abetting him was an adversary.” Trump himself also contributed to the dysfunction: “He enjoyed and contributed to interpersonal drama in the White House and across the administration.”

            Notice how many decorated military leaders formerly in his administration have spoken out against Trump–and they all say the same thing–he’s lacking in knowledge of history, lacking in patriotism, is petty, vindictive, doesn’t listen, and is hell-bent on getting revenge and appearing to be in control of the situation. Of course Putin wants Trump to win–for some of the same reasons he wanted im to win in 2016–to remove sanctions, try to get Russia back into the G-7, but now, to pull funding for Ukraine. This is why Republicans keep trash-talking Zelenskyy and Ukraine. There is, in fact, no one weaker than Trump–a petty, narcissistic egomaniac who craves power, attention and adulation and who will do anything necessary to get it and keep it. That’s why Russia is, once again, is meddling in our elections. World leaders, like former KGB Putin, understand Trump and know how to manipulate his weaknesses. They don’t respect Trump and are afraid of Harris. WE’RE NOT GOING BACK.

            1. Gigenius the spastic idiot and pathological liar,

              What ever happened to “Trump’s” tariffs?

              1. Here’s Goldman Sach’s analysis of Harris v. Trump and their economic policies:

                ““We estimate that if Trump wins in a sweep or with divided government, the hit to growth from tariffs and tighter immigration policy would outweigh the positive fiscal impulse,” they wrote in a Tuesday analysis.

                Goldman predicted better performance outcomes in the event of a Harris presidency along with Democratic control of Congress, arguing that spending initiatives and tax credits would “more than offset” the hit to investment caused by a higher corporate income tax rate, which Vice President Harris has proposed increasing to 28 percent.

                The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Trump’s marquee tax-cut bill, dropped the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent. President Biden’s most recent budget proposal also called for raising the corporate tax rate to 28 percent.

                In the scenario that Harris wins the presidency and Congress is divided, policy changes would be “small” and have a neutral effect on GDP, Goldman said.
                Related video: Economic resilience among drivers of M&A growth expectations, analyst says (CNBC)

                Economic resilience among drivers of M&A growth expectations, analyst says

                “Vice President Harris has a positive vision to strengthen the economy by building up the middle class, cutting taxes and lowering costs for working families and small businesses, and creating opportunities for all Americans to get ahead. On the economy, the choice could not be any more clear this November,” Harris-Walz campaign spokesperson Joseph Costello said in a statement.”

                Excerpted from “CNN”, dateline 9/5/24, entitled “The Trump policy Thadt Scares Economists the Most”:

                Former President Donald Trump wants to spend trillions of dollars on tax cuts. His plan to pay for that is alarming some mainstream economists.

                Trump proposed sweeping tariffs on all $3 trillion worth of imports into the United States, including a 60% tariff on imports from China and a 10% across-the-board tariff on imports from other nations.

                Recently, Trump doubled down on the threat, saying he is considering tariffs of up to 20% on most imports in a bid to protect working-class jobs and punish what he labels unfair trading practices.

                In theory, the unprecedented tariff hikes could raise trillions of dollars, funds that would help cover the cost of the tax cuts. However, many economists warn that those tariffs could backfire – badly – by raising prices on American families, killing jobs and setting off a global trade war.

                It’s part of the reason Goldman Sachs in an analyst note this week said Trump’s economic policies – particularly on trade – would cause America’s economy to shrink. By contrast, Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic policy proposals would grow the economy, Goldman Sachs predicted.

                Goldman and other experts fear Trump’s tough proposed trade tactics could worsen the affordability crisis in America.

                “It’s one of those magical economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, told CNN in a phone interview.

                Kelly warned that tariffs are a “perfect stagflation machine,” threaten to scramble supply chains and invite a punishing response from trading partners.

                “It’s a two-year-old’s mentality: You punch someone in the nose and expect them not to punch you back,” he said.”

                Here’s what analysts say about the Trump tariffs, the amount of which varies depending on when he opens his mouth–he has said 10% and sometimes 20?%: American Action Forum says Trump tariffs would cost the average American household $1,700 to $2350 per year;

                The Urban Institute Brookings Institute of Tax Policy calculated the cost to be $1,800/year;

                The Center For American Progress estimated the cost to be $3,900–assuming the 20% figure;

                The Peterson Institute of International Economics puts the loss at $1,700.

                Trump refuses to back down or admit that imposing tariffs would essentially amount to a sales tax because the increased cost of imported goods is paid by the consumer in the form of higher costs for goods and component parts–not by the exporting country. The above is not taking into consideration reciprocal tariffs that likely would be imposed by countries to which we export goods. Then, there’s what would happen to perishable agricultural products like fruits and vegetables if Trump incarcerates and deports the millions of migrants who pick and pack our produce. We don’t have replacements for them. Trump does not understand economics.

                Now, Tom, WHAT is your point about Trumpy Bear and his tariffs?

                1. Are you a spastic? I asked you what became of his tariffs. It’s a simple question. You previously claimed that they caused the 9% inflation. What became of those tariffs?

            2. ‘Gigi’
              Kamala also did NOT prosecute pedophile priests
              despite piles of evidence against them
              (but she did accept a lot of money from the churches).

              1. Be specific about “pedphile priests”–was there enough evidence? Did she deliberately REFUSE to prosecute pedophile priests when there was a complaining victim that demanded justice? And, I don’t believe your claim about her “accepting money” because if a church makes campaign contributions, they would lose their tax-exempt status.

            3. Harris was a tough courtroom prosecutor and Attorney General who not only took on drug dealers and won, but took on banks that cheated customers–and won several millions for California citizens.

              Gigi, let’s keep going completely off topic with one of your normally favorite topics: law and courts:

              BREAKING!!!! Junior Partner In Biden White House Crime LLC Changes Plea To Guilty Hours Before Trial On Tax Evasion Begins!
              https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/hunter-biden-expected-plead-guilty-federal-tax-case-abrupt-reversal-report

              That said, there’s nothing “tough” about District Attorney Round Heels Harris REFUSING to continue the prosecution of the San Francisco pedophile priests as long as they were also willing to continue giving Commissar Nancy Pelosi communion while she continued to demand elective birth control abortion right up to the moment of birth.

              Don’t lie to us that being the keen courtroom investigative reporter that you are, you never heard about the victims of Pelosi’s pedophile priests expressing their outrage at Round Heels Harris then and now.

              Because if you DO claim you aren’t aware of that, I am going to provide you (more importantly, anyone willing to pay attention to your trash) with the links – articles that appeared in your favorite Soviet Democrat propaganda news media.

              Gigi, do you prefer your pedophiles and pedophile defenders to be male like Bribery Biden, the senior partner in Biden White House Crime LLC (and White House Pedophile in Chief). And of course Epstein’s favorite customer traveling on the Lolita Express to Orgy Island, Blow Job Bill Clinton?

              Or do you prefer them to be Birthing Persons like Willy Brown’s selected District Attorney he rewarded for the calluses on her knees, Skanky Ho Harris?

              1. Old Dog: NO ONE outside of MAGA world gives a rat’s anus about Hunter Biden or the problems he underwent when recovering from addiction. He has paid the taxes he owed, plus penalties. And, here’s something for you to chew on–he’s being prosecuted by a Special Prosecutor–Trumpy Bear says that Special Prosecutors are invalid–so, what about that? There is NO “Biden Crime Family” no matter how many times that dipstick loser Mark Levin repeats the phrase. HOW much effort have House Republicans wasted trying to prove that Joe Biden received bribes, and come up short? Where is the proof that Harris refused to prosecute pedophile priests for cases that she could have won? AND, no matter how many times Trump lies about abortion after birth–it’s still a LIE. That’s called “murder” in virtually every US state.

                And, when MAGA media lies about churches were giving Harris campaign contributions in exchange for not prosecuting pedophile priests, know this–the reason they don’t is because they would lose their tax-exempt status. You can claim that alleged “victims” of pedophile priests are outraged, but do you know anything else about the facts? WHERE the hell do you get off calling them “Pelosi pedophile priests”? The cases may not have been prosecutable for dozens of reasons, including lack of evidence, changes in the alleged victims’ stories, failure to report, expiration of the statute of limitations and other valid reasons.

                1. This is alternate GG. She likes to use colorful metaphors like rats, anus, and Trumpy bear. Daytime GG does not. Notice the similar, but different avatar.

                  Go fvck yourself night time GG

                2. Old Dog: NO ONE outside of MAGA world gives a rat’s anus about Hunter Biden

                  Perfect that you would mention rats. Not because it’s a perfect term for Democrats. True, but because “a rat” is also a term used to describe a criminal who finks out other criminals he knows about to save himself from years of being a heavyweight con’s Boy Toy. Criminals care a LOT about criminals who know them becoming rats.

                  So yeah… nobody cares about that evil little druggy pervert. Except Soviet Democrat mob bosses terrified that, if sentenced to jail, that perverted little rat’s anus that was The Family Cashier Formerly Known As The Crackhead Kid could start ratting out Soviet Democrat mob bosses who are dirty. Like the mysterious “The Big Guy” who the crackhead sex pervert complained took 10% of the take collected from the family’s Chicom and Russian customers.

                  If the junior partner in Biden White House Crime LLC ratted out the senior partner, and that senior partner was The Big Guy, President Biden, Soviet Democrat mob boss terror is real.

                  Gigi, you dropped Bribery Biden faster than an ice cold vibrator the moment he was of no further use to Soviet Democrats and advancing communism.

                  But Soviet Democrat mob bosses know that after 50 years in Washington DC, Bribery Biden was up to his eyes in party crime and corruption. Bribery Biden knows where ALL the Democrat party mob bosses’ skeletons are buried.

                  And just as The First Gun Felon Drug son could rat out The Big Guy to save himself, The Big Guy who knows where all the Democrat mob bosses’ skeletons are buried could rat out those other mob bosses to save himself. The entire Soviet Democrat party would become the hostages of Bribery Biden if he also saved himself by being a rat.

                  Bribery Biden knows where ALL of Bolshevik Barack’s skeletons are buried after being around him for eight years – he’d be a threat to Bolshevik Barack and Moochelle continuing to live their life of White Privilege.

                  Bribery Biden knows where ALL of the Clinton Crime Cartel’s skeletons are buried, both the ones of Blow Job Bill and Senator Killary. (Biden might Epstein himself?) After all, he spent over 30 years working and conspiring with both of them.

                  And not only does Bribery Biden know where Commissar Pelosi’s skeletons are buried – he’s also now got motive to fink out Nancy after she knifed him in the back and pushed him out the door.

                  Senator Schumer’s skeletons – his former fellow Senator friend who helped Commissar Pelosi knife him in the back? Oh yeah – Bribery Biden wouldn’t mind ratting him out.

                  Yes indeed Gigi, Soviet Democrats care deeply about The First Gun Felon Drug Son while he poses a threat. You’re lying to claim they don’t.

                3. Old Dog: NO ONE outside of MAGA world gives a rat’s anus about Hunter Biden

                  You are right about just one thing: It’s not that anyone other than the mystery “Big Guy” actually cares one small bit about yet another drug addict, sexual pervert and pedophile like The Crackhead Kid. After all, The Feces And Needle Strewn Streets of Soviet Democrat Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco is full of them. Ditto for Chuck Schumer’s city of New York.

                  Others that don’t give a rat’s anus includes dipstick Bolshevik Bytches on broomsticks, flying around lying while stinking of stale cat p1ss. They don’t care either – as they sob about “empathy” for corrupt middle aged pedophile junkies.

                  Empathy and a Greta Thunberg “How dare you!” in defense of middle aged sex pervert junkies who reject responsibility for their own children, are screwing their dead brother’s widow before the brother’s body is cold while turning her into a junky at the same time. Oh… and turning his younger sister into a pimp, sent out to procure more women for him.

                  If you weren’t lying your dipstick saggy Bolshevik Bytch ass off you’d have explained why – if nobody cared – the Biden DoJ, FBI, and Biden’s Attorney General spent YEARS, attempting to conceal The First Gun Felon Son’s crime wave of felonies committed while President Daddy-Daughter Inappropriate Incest Showers was Vice President.

                  If no Soviet Democrats cared, only Republicans, justify why Biden’s Attorney General kept prosecutors dragging their feet, turning a blind eye until the statute of limitations ran out on the most serious income tax fraud charges? Gigi, does your Soviet Democrat Memory Hole forget the multiple whistleblowers who came forward to explain how that was done?

                  Soviet Democrat prosecutors don’t do that for black entertainers and athletes facing the same charges for smaller amounts of tax fraud – but you want to lie to us that they do that for The First Gun Felon Drug Son despite “nobody cares”?

                  If only Republicans cared, explain to your audience why Merrick Garland approved The Get Out Of Jail For EVERYTHING Amnesty offered to The First Gun Felon Drug Son – an amnesty deal that required The First Gun Felon Drug Son to provide NOTHING in the way of evidence to help the investigators that were investigating other crimes at the same time? Get a misdemeanor minor slap on the wrist rather than a felony conviction – in exchange for giving up nothing?

                  “Nobody cared”… but that contemptible little pervert got the deal of the century, that even Soviet Democrat prosecutors were going “Wow… never seen THAT before…” Neither had the judge – which is why it didn’t work.

                  Oh yeah Gigi! Your fellow Soviet Democrats are TERRIFIED that if The Family Cashier Formerly Known As The Crackhead Kid gets any kind of serious jail sentence, he will rat out the senior partner in Biden White House Crime LLC, the mystery person referred to as “The Big Guy”.

                  They all know that the corrupt Bribery Biden and his equally corrupt First Former Family Babysitter Back To Being The Family Babysitter, Jill Biden, don’t even have the morals of an actual rat.

                  And in the end, they showed no loyalty or mercy to Biden and the Biden rat family – they know they won’t get any from any Biden when being a rat could save them.

                  How about hopping back on your broomstick and flying away… the sophomoric lies don’t even have some amusement value.

        2. Your believing anything Putin says does not surprise me.

          Soviet Democrats selling Russia, Russia, Russia! lost their credibility years ago, when we discovered that the only Russians involved in the Soviet Democrats “Russia Dossier v1.0” was Putin’s FSB stooge who was under investigation for espionage – who Clinton/Obama/Biden/the DNC then illegally hired (while ordering the FBI to stop their investigation) to write their “Russia Dossier” for them.

          FishAnus, in 2016 the president ordered his Attorney General and FBI Director at that time to take their fraudulent “Russia Dossier” to FISA courts, perjure themselves to those courts that it was all verified intelligence agency evidence, in order to get spy warrants that were later declared by FISA to be illegal.

          Then they “leaked” like crazy to every friendly Mainstream Media propagandist that Putin had bought Trump to be his stooge and they were mere weeks away from indictments. Just another version of what they did to Governor Bob McDonnell in the prior 2012 presidential election.

          FishAnus, let’s talk about believing anything: You want normal Americans to believe that the same Merrick Garland that ordered the DOJ to drag it’s feet for the last few years so that the most serious income tax fraud charges against The First Gun Felon Son would run out due to the statute of limitations, the FBI that did everything to to conceal the Biden Bribery Laptop before the 2020 election wouldn’t have any political motivation now?

          You want normal Americans to believe that Putin would rather face the Trump who bombed his Middle East bases and slaughtered his troops when he ignored Trump’s warning to back off?

          Putin wouldn’t instead rather have Harris delivering Obama’s Fourth Term? Another Soviet Democrat administration letting him continue to invade foreign countries at will, a Soviet Democrat administration whose military focus was Alphabet Sex Pride, Trannies Are Our Strength, Diversity and Equity, and promotion based on dark skin color and Marxist sympathies?

          You truly believe that Putin would rather face a Trump presidency and a Trump presidency rather than a Harris Obama’s Fourth Term and Woke Alphabet Sex Tranny military?

          So what are you, FishAnus: gullible Marxist Soviet Democrat Useful Idiot?

          Or merely yet another incredibly amateurish Soviet Democrat apparatchik liar?

      1. UpstateFarmer, I would suggest is that Putin wants chaos. The kind of chaos of Russia, Russia, Russia! v3.4, that would have fearful Americans voting for Obama’s Fourth Term giving Putin yet more room to manoever, believing the continued lies that Trump is in Putin’s pockets. They have as quickly forgotten that it was Trump who hit Russian bases and butchered Putin’s troops in the Middle East (where Obama/Biden let them in), just as they have quickly forgotten it was Obama who promised Putin he’d let him invade after his final election.

        Just as they have quickly forgotten that it was Obama/Biden who let Putin invade Ukraine the first time, and then Biden serving Obama’s Third Term who allowed Putin to invade Ukraine a second time.

        Normal Americans (i.e. not Soviet Democrat apparatchiks like FishAnus) would ask themselves: “Would Putin prefer an American president and American military headed by Trump with his record? Or an America with Harris as Obama’s Fourth Term and the continuing Woke Alphabet Sex, Diversity and Equity military”

        Anyone believing Putin would prefer Trump rather than more Biden after he paid him off, and now Harris after Biden and the Soviet Democrats couldn’t hide his dementia for just a few more months, is either a flat out liar (and probably a “news journalist”)… or they need to quit sharing drugs with the once again convicted felon, The First Gun Felon Son.

        This is just Trump Russia Dossier v4.7… and having Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco along with the FBI Director deliver thi,s as Obama’s Attorney General (and Lisa Monaco) and the then FBI Director delivered Russia Dossier v1.0 in 2016 demands more answers.

        BTW… a few months ago, polling of registered Democrats found that 70% of them STILL believe the Clinton/Obama/Biden/DNC “Russia Dossier” of 2016 was genuine – not a criminal fraud purchased by these Soviet Democrats. With that in mind, what are the chances that Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, the FBI Director had that in mind while making this announcement?

    3. No normal American would scratch their heads and wonder if Putin would rather have Harris delivering Obama’s Fourth Term running the USA rather than another four years of Trump with Vance at his side? And why is FishAnus writing about yesterdays news when the Breaking News is that the junior partner in Biden White House Crime LLC just changed his plea to guilty?

      FishAnus wants this to be Russia Dossier v4.3 FishAnus hopes the Soviet Democrats can Memory Hole the fact that their “Russia Dossier” was a criminal propaganda attack on our American democracy – while they claimed they were forced to do it to defend American democracy.

      A Soviet Democrat criminal conspiracy where Clinton/Obama/Biden/the DNC illegally paid a Putin FSB agent under investigation here in the USA for espionage to write their “Dossier” – while the Soviet Democrats and their Mainstream Media Marxist propagandists pushed the lie it was all collected by intelligence agencies and all verified. That’s what “pro-MAGA” is to these amateur but vicious liars like FishAnus.

      Anybody here ever wonder if what Putin wants is what Merrick Garland wants: chaos. Chaos from this announcement leading to Marxist Useful Idiots running screaming to forums to babble “MAGA”… and that fear porn leading to Americans voting in Obama’s Fourth Term.

      Anybody wonder if Putin wants exactly what FishAnus and Dennis McIntyre here want: Another Soviet Democrat president who will continue the Soviet Democrat party tradition of letting Putin repeatedly invade Ukraine while at the same time making the US military weaker and weaker?

      FishAnus probably didn’t notice that Putin’s military doesn’t concentrate on being diverse, racist promotion policies, Alphabet Sex Pride Parades, Trannies Are Our Strength, etc. Just as the US military didn’t do that cultural Marxist crap when Trump was in office. Putin trains his military to be able to kill the most of his enemies with the fewest of them being killed while doing so. He’s a communist like FishAnus, Biden, and Harris – BUT PUTIN WILL NOT TOLERATE CULTURAL MARXISM IN HIS MILITARY.

      Cultural Marxism only exists in America under Soviet Democrat presidents like Bolshevik Barack, Bribery Biden standing in for Obama’s Third Term, and now VP Skanky Ho promising to further weaken the US military while letting Putin do what he wants if she gets to be Obama’s Fourth Term.

      Yeah… tell it like it is, FishAnus. BTW… how about that First Gun Felon Son guilty plea just minutes before his trail started? Think he might rat out The Big Guy to minimize his sentence?

      Or are you convinced that Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco will still have The Big Guy’s back: Bribery Biden may be demented, but he and his family definitely know where all of the Obama and Clinton skeletons can be dug up.

    4. Fishstick, have you actually looked into the details of what happened?

      “The influencers named appear to have been deceived about funding sources by Lauren Chen, founder Tenet. Secondly, Lauren Chen, the alleged Russian agent receiving millions for propaganda (allegedly) has actively been discouraging votes for Trump and dividing the Right. Read the… pic.twitter.com/2JmVk2iml3”
      — Ashley St. Clair (@stclairashley) September 4, 2024

      “Interestingly enough, in recent weeks, Lauren has been telling her followers to boycott Trump. It’s entirely unclear if she was doing so at the direction of the Russian government. Nonetheless, worth noting. pic.twitter.com/o9mLFw7gMH”
      — Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) September 4, 2024

      “So @Timcast announces he will be suing Kamala and her campaign for defamation and within 24 hrs the DOJ launches an assault calling him a paid Russian asset.

      Nothing to see here. Move along.”
      — Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) September 4, 2024

    5. @FishWings

      😂😂😂

      Wow, you are an idiot. Non sequitur is your specialty. You are so good at it, you should be paid for it. Wait. You probably are. 🙄

      Or you are very bored.

      Either way, uh-huh, sure, ‘FishWings’ (*cough*Natacha*cough*). 🙄 Whatever you say.

  7. Aren’t they also the most expensive? So free speech exists in inverse proportion to price? That’s interesting.

  8. “………. While some professors have argued that free speech and intellectual diversity are not essential to higher education …….” so, the only diversity that matters is the shade of one’s skin.

  9. I have many relatives who went to Harvard, Columbia, and Northwestern. I love ’em more than anything, but they are unreachable. Colleges are the most effective indoctrination centers ever created. No Soviet institution could ever match them for shear brainwashing. It’s scary how so many bright people can so quickly and easily surrender every scrap of reasonable doubt.

    When an institution has that kind of power, diversity of thought is a moral obligation. At this point, one would have to burn most colleges to ground and start over to meet that obligation. The group think has become impenetrable.

    When I was in college, I politely challenged my professors, and I was fortunate in that they magnanimously rose to the occasion. I never fully adopted their outlook, but I did come to accept some of it after I left graduate school. My thinking has continued to evolve.

    This is an outlook most of my relatives will never care to understand. They’re still trying to body snatch my brain, so I listen patiently, but if I know–with metaphysical certitude–that if I challenged them the way I used to challenge my professors, Thanksgiving would go bye-bye 🙁

    1. Hear, hear!

      The singular American failure is the judicial branch, with emphasis on the Supreme Court.

      The Supreme Court of 2022 began its patriotic work of the “Great Correction” with Dobbs, overturning the flagrant and egregious corruption of the Supreme Court of 1973. 

      The Supreme Court of 2024 must now proceed to “tear down this wall” of the entire anti-constitutional communist American welfare state. 

      Your relatives and the nation will come to reap the benefits of freedom and finally understand. 

    2. Colleges are the most effective indoctrination centers ever created.

      More accurately, places where young people can be gathered together for indoctrination. Not always schools. Wherever the place or the supposed function, there is a central theme.

      Today’s hajji terrorist Caliphate in Iran, Gaza, Beirut, etc. began with the hajjis sweeping through Afghanistan after the Russians left because the USSR back home was crumbling, to sweep up all the orphans whose war widowed mothers didn’t know how to feed them. The hajjis assured those mothers that they would provide their young children with what Soviet Democrats now call “food security”, clothing, health care – and a hajji education. One which glorified the act of suicide to kill infidels as the sure path to paradise. They only made this Sophie’s Choice offer to mothers of sons – the hajjis had no interest in providing this “service” to daughters.

      This was just a continuation of the hajji Muslim Caliphate centuries earlier establishing their shock troops -the Jannessaries. The hajjis prowled through their occupied Christian lands, forcibly taking the biggest, strongest boys from their parents. These very young boys were then grouped together in camps that the hajjis had styled after Sparta: an unending program of physical hardening and teachings of the skills of war. Denied every normal thing in adolescent life: play, sexual attraction to girls, etc. They were indoctrinated that their only goal in life was to be the shock troops of the Caliph of the day, that if they did die in battle, there was no better way to die.

      Then you have the Hitler Youth Movement of the 1930’s and 1940’s. No focus on education: instead, National Socialism and anti-Semitism being the focus of that youth group.

      The Soviet Union, like Hitler, had the mandatory Komsomol for about 50 years until Reagan drove a stake through the heart of Russian communism. Not a college or university – a youth movement sold as being similar to our Boy Scouts, 4-H, etc. As Hitler used his youth group to indoctrinate into the National Socialist version of Marxist-communist theology, the USSR indoctrinated youths to become faithful followers and believers in the Soviet Union versioin of Marxist-communist theology.

      The central theme in this is that whether a “school” of some sort or a youth group that supposedly helped children grow to be strong, wide adults, whatever was involved, the central theme was to indoctrinate to serve mindlessly a theology that rejected independent thought, family, church, etc.

      There is very little to differentiate between the hajji terrorist Muslim theologies and youth indoctrination than the Marxist theology and it’s youth indoctrination that also rejects loyalty to the load bearing walls of a civil society.

  10. Freedom of speech and freedom of thought matter.

    If a person takes a look at what is going on in the UK, they will see an alarming trend where everyday common citizens are being harassed and in some cases arrested for making an offhanded remark, posting something on Facebook, or reposting. The police have been given a great deal of authority and lack common sense. In one case a 14 year old autistic child was visited by the police an told that because he told a girl, who dressed like a girl,, and was a girl and said she was a boy, “No, you’re a girl.” He was told that if he persisted in his radicalized ideology, he could end up in prison.

    Citizens are given an option to sign a confession of a “Non crime crime” and pay to go to a reeducation seminar or they will face having their “hate” be put in a permanent record (for their employers to see) and face arrest.

    Harry Miller, a former police officer was visited by the police a few years back and was told they were there to “check on his thinking” because of a Facebook post. He was so alarmed, he filed suit and took his case to the high court and won. The government employees hundreds of bureaucrats and he stood alone and won his case.

    Meanwhile, the police who now have an added component to their oath swear to defend “human rights” but this additive statement allows them to act as a law of their own.

    Not everyone has the fortitude and forbearance and quite frankly the time to take on the state. It is frightening how common sense seems to have flown out the window and the masses follow in lockstep with the loudest voices of activists groups as opposed to knowing and understanding their rights and the law.

    Human nature is human nature. If an institute such as a school, police, government etc. choose sides, then those who have been inculcated with a radical ideology will often view any other point of view or those that hold these views as the “enemy.”

    This election will not be about personalities (both candidates are lacking in many aspects) but it is about policy. Voters must look past the personalities and see what policies will be best in the long run. It doesn’t matter if a person hates the former President, they should be concerned that his opponent will not and cannot sit down for an interview that is not scripted nor can they face hard questions with difficult follow up question. Both candidates should be subjected to hard and difficult questions that are being hurled at them in force. If they cannot stand up to such scrutiny, then they need to go home

    Alarming, is the bold face lies, the corrupt media and the deployment of propaganda that would make Joseph Goebbels thrilled to see. Fortunately, corporate media has lost much of its former influence and they typical viewer the baby boomer and older. Younger viewers have long since left the room.

    Look up Harry Miller on Youtube and watch for a minute of two. You will be shocked at the state of affairs in the U.K as it pertains to freedom of speech issues. He had the guts to fight them in his own case and is now helping other do the same.

    https://youtu.be/yh9wYKACR0c?si=-Uv3aGxGDOwfv1ud

  11. Harvard and Columbia worst for free speech?

    That statement needs a qualifier.

    They seem very open to attacking Jews.

    Harvard men were very much behind hanging ‘witches’ in 1692. Not much changing there it seems.

  12. It may be of importance to realize that leaders of these colleges have made their entire careers using words. Words are all they know, with policies, platitudes, and politics. Words are mostly ineffective against violence, and while counter-action may called for, they they resist using it – to the point where action becomes chaos.

  13. Jonathan: According to you the recent FIRE survey proves there “is still a growing anti-free speech movement on our campuses”…and that “schools also have largely purged and Republican faculty from their ranks”. I don’t see the connection.

    FIRE is not a neutral observer. It promotes attacks on the “cancel culture” and calls for more conservative faculty on campuses without any proof there has been any attempt to “purge” conservative faculty. FIRE receive most of its funding from right-wing groups like the Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, and the Charles Koch Institute. FIRE doesn’t promote “free speech” for everyone–and all its lawsuits promote only the views of conservatives. The latest FIRE survey is arbitrary and skewed to reflect that political agenda.

    As the fall term on campuses begins no doubt there will be continuing campus protests over Israel’s war against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank. That will be a defining moment for campus “free speech”. Will FIRE support those protests and will you? Based on your views of the protests earlier in the year I suspect we know the answer.

    1. “FIRE doesn’t promote “free speech” for everyone–and all its lawsuits promote only the views of conservatives.”

      Two lies in one sentence.

      You’re moving up in the world. (Or is it down?)

    2. Jonathan: According to you the recent FIRE survey proves there “is still a growing anti-free speech movement on our campuses”

      Dennis: I am SHOCKED you did not begin your work day here with an off topic BREAKING NEWS STORY! Why did you deprive your dear friend Jonathan (Professor Turley as he’s known to we mere mortals) of this breaking news:

      BREAKING!!! HUNTER BIDEN SURPRISES DOJ BY CHANGING HIS PLEA FROM NOT GUILTY TO GUILTY!
      https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/hunter-biden-expected-plead-guilty-federal-tax-case-abrupt-reversal-report

      You obsessed just yesterday with presenting your dear friend Jonathan with your lengthy screed regarding Elon Musk’s civil law woes. Why would you dare to presume that your bestie Jonathan wouldn’t want you to give him the breaking news that half of the Biden White House Crime LLC gang has surprised prosecutors by suddenly pleading guilty hours before his trial was to start?

      Is this The First Gun Felon Son’s strategy to get one of those very special DoJ Democrat agreements? Is this the alternative after the Amnesty For Every Single Felony You Committed plea deal fell through?

      Now instead of a pre-trial plea deal, this deal will allow the DOJ prosecutor to agree to a minimal sentence? A slap on the wrist rather than the years in jail that black entertainers who never got multimillion dollar record or movie contracts anything like the $30 million that The First Gun Felon Son got from the Chicoms and Putin? A special Rich White Privilege slap on the wrist while Merrick Garland throws blacks behind bars for years for doing the same thing?

      Another tantalizing question: federal prosecutors generally expect something from a felon for going along with what they ask for with their change of plea. What will it be here?

      Will the federal prosecutors here demand that in return for them giving the now twice convicted First Repeat Felon Son a deal… they will DEMAND THAT HUNTER RAT OUT THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS WHO WERE INVOLVED IN THE WHITE HOUSE FAMILY TAX FRAUD?

      Or will the Biden DOJ (and their Fake News Media Propagandists) show a continuing lack of curiosity about finding evidence that The Big Guy was part of the tax fraud?

      Dennis; as the Soviet Democrats’ official representative here, are you forbidden to discuss this with Jonathan (and the rest of us)?

    3. I guess conservatives don’t want the higher salaries found at well funded Ivy league schools so they don’t try to get jobs there. Maybe you are one of the ones that think conservatives are just stupid and don’t have the ability to teach at such schools?

  14. * it’s a scheme to dumb down the masses. There really is a chasm of difference between an IQ of 150 and 100. That does include a spirit of good will and not ill will. Universities were once places of assembly for those of 150+ with good will.

    The losers are the general masses.

    1. The scheme to dumb down the masses went into high gear with NCLB and the corporatization of education.

    2. The book the Bell Curve reports in
      1960’s an IQ of 80 was considered mentally retarded.

      1. The book the Bell Curve reports in 1960’s an IQ of 80 was considered mentally retarded.

        My first degree in criminology back in the 1970’s is now well behind me. But I was obligated to take at least one psychology course every single year of that degree. One thing I do remember well from way back then was a discussion that IQ tests were badly flawed in that the test questions had an unintended cultural bias baked into the cake. Back then in the early 1970’s, nobody was disputing that fact – the IQ tests being discussed were from the 30, 20 years earlier, etc.

        So with the IQ tests of the day being constructed by the intelligentsia of Harvard, Stanford, etc., if the people surrounding you were from that milieu as you grew up, the IQ test was essentially written to test people like you. If instead you grew up in a small sharecropper community in Georgia, Alabama, the oil patch in Texas, a Montana ranching community, no matter what your skin color, the environment you were brought up in was a handicap to your comprehension of questions originating in self-appointed elitist minds.

        Black Americans as far as this specific subject goes, were very much justified in attacking IQ tests of the day that determined that black Americans as a race were just glorified monkeys, not as intelligent as white Americans. (Part of George’s belief that third and fourth generation black Americans should be “compassionately repatriated” to countries they’d never set foot in)

        Those using the IQ tests back then (i.e. young Senator Biden and his fellow Democrat Kluxxers like Senator Robert Byrd) for racist objectives never bothered to mention that young whites from those same sharecropper communities, the Irish slums of Boston, New York, poverty stricken coal mining towns in Appalachia, etc ALSO did poorly on those IQ tests for the same reason.

        They were Americans – but Americans two worlds apart. Or more accurately, an elitist world with Ivy League campuses as the nurturing environment placed well above the world of normal Americans raised in a world that if you wanted to improve your place on the economic ladder, the only way you were going to do that was through your own effort… not your birthright elitist world.

        I imagine that there are many versions of ‘IQ tests’ in use today that have faithfully done their best to eliminate confounding variables like the cultural environment a child grew up in. But there will always be people eager to selectively use badly flawed ‘IQ tests’ and similarly flawed tests for nefarious purposes.

        Just like Soviet Democrats like our very own Dennis McIntyre and FishAnus like to use Fake News for nefarious purposes.

  15. ““I, FREEDOM, dwell with Knowledge: I abide
    With men whom dust of faction cannot blind
    To the slow tracings of the Eternal Mind;
    With men by culture trained and fortified,
    Who bitter duty to sweet lusts prefer,
    Fearless to counsel and obey.
    Conscience my sceptre is, and law my sword,
    Not to be drawn in passion or in play,
    But terrible to punish and deter;
    Implacable as God’s word,
    Like it, a shepherd’s crook to them that blindly err.”
    ~James Russell Lowell

    It’s rather dusty in America as of late.

  16. Absolutely, bleed them of endowments and tuition. It’s sad, but this has become the only language they understand. In addition to be incubators for intolerance, our universities are also incubators for entitlement and very unrealistic expectations. Make it perfectly clear to them WHY you refuse financial support.

    1. * No hearts will changed from ill will to good will. Your scheme is merely punishment and hardens hearts and resolve.

  17. After the greatest generation gave all for their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren for the freedoms that people around the world hunger for, they piss it away. We should all hang our heads in shame for standing by and allowing a modern day pogrom occur on our college campuses. Shame on all of us for allowing this and tolerating corruption in our government.

    1. We should all hang our heads in shame for standing by and allowing a modern day pogrom occur on our college campuses.

      This is the long term suicide that Soviet Democrat Marxist Useful Idiots have committed themselves to: INTERSECTIONALITY.

      The Alphabet Sex pride Tribe For Hamas crowd that are part of the Soviet Democrats New Hitler Youth Movement. Deliberately turning a blind eye to the fact that not only are the hajji terrorists they support chanting ‘Death To The Great Satan’ as much as their genocidal anti-Semitic ‘Death To The Little Satan”, but also ignoring that if the Gaza/Lebanan/’West Bank”/Iranian hajjis ever got their hands on them, they would be getting one way airmailed from the top story of a highrise building. Or hung from a crane in the public square.

      And where the Soviet Democrats and their apparatchiks here like Dennis McIntyre, Gigi, and FishAnus are concerned, their loathing of a constitutional America and wanting a Marxist America instead requires them to turn a blind eye to the fact that their Dear Leaders will not be able to do a better job of communism than Venezuela, Cuba, the Soviet Union, etc were able to do. They turn a blind eye to the obvious fact that an Equity neo-communist America would not spare them from the economic poverty equity that Venezuela has been experiencing after they voted themselves into communist totalitarianism.

      “intersectionality” is how people who favor totalitarians in control of their country commit suicide in slow motion.

  18. 2 Months to go! 👨‍💼 Trump-Vance 🦅 | 🥴 Harris-Walz 😵
    Today is September 5th-> October(①)-> November(②) Tuesday 5th-> 2024 | Election Day 🇺🇸

    1. Neither candidate is cut out for the job. Whichever one wins will be tested by our adversaries, sensing their opportunity to wreak havoc. Both Trump and Harris live in isolated, comfort-seeking info-bubbles…both have huge blind spots.

      1. The question is which is more likely to succumb to the control of the cabal? We know Harris is 100% by her record while Trump is a Wild card. It’s not who is to win, it’s who will they allow to win.

      2. If one thinks neither candidate is good, one can compare their records. Do you like the threat of war with this candidate? How about inflation? One need not mention all the things that Trump did compared to the failures of the Biden-Harris administration.

        ‘Neither candidate is cut out for the job“

        When comparing administrations, one must wonder about your thinking process.

        1. S. Meyer,
          That is a good point.
          I do not recall who it was, some former CEO of some tech company, but he stopped his hate for Trump, looked at what Trump did, his policies, his record as president objectively and made his own conclusion: Trump’s presidency was not all bad, a lot of good and the COVID part so not his fault.
          Looking at Harris and Waltz records, not much there or that which is really good. If they think tampons in boys restrooms is good progress someone needs their head checked.

      3. Neither candidate is cut out for the job.

        When does pbinca take the time to tell us what a horrible job Trump did during his first four years in office?

        Trump’s record in the White House that is so horrible that pbinca – who has never said anything about Governor Newsom/Commissar Pelosi also being unqualified to do their jobs when looking at what California has become during their reign – dreads another four years of Trump? Does he think he’d be compelled to go on a Grinder date with Trump? Forced to play golf with him?

        Does pginca evaluate Trump with his California emotions? Or the cold logic of somebody sitting down to figure out the family finances, and whether or not they can afford an optional expense?

        I don’t think pbinca really wants his standards of deciding who is qualified for the job put up for inspection by normal Americans. Normal Americans who dread the thought of living under the Kalifornia Communists that have lead to the Feces And Needles Strewn Streets Of San Francisco.

        False flag pbinca – another Cheap Fake American.

Comments are closed.