Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz appears to be living through a remake of the Seinfeld Soup Nazi episode. However, Dershowitz is facing a new culinary menace in Martha’s Vineyard. Chef Krem Miskevich has barred the famed lawyer from buying pierogis because of his political views . . . and liberals are applauding him for it. Welcome to Pierogi Politics, it is the same distasteful politics that is tearing apart this country . . . only with an added carbo load.
Dershowitz has previously described how his liberal neighbors, who were friendly when he was advancing liberal causes, have blacklisted him in the elite community due to his defense of Donald Trump. He is treated as a persona non grata and shunned by the wealthy community.
Now the blacklisting has extended to food. Dershowitz would regularly go to the West Tisbury Farmers Market and buy food from the Good Pierogi. Then Miskevich decided to join the mob and bar him from eating.
Miskevich (who goes by pronouns “they” and “them”) also accused Dershowitz of misgendering by referring to “him” in passing (Dershowitz said that he would happily use his preferred pronouns). However, Miskevich admits it is his political and legal views that led him to blacklist the professor.
Dershowitz is now pursuing legal action against the West Tisbury Farmers Marketand posted a statement on his YouTube channel last week, stating “He didn’t approve of my politics so he wouldn’t serve me.”
Dershowitz suggested that the initial rejection may have been due to his wearing a pro-Jewish T-shirt. In his initial encounter, he had reminded the vendor that Massachusetts law prohibits refusing service based on race, religion or sexual orientation: “You couldn’t say I don’t serve black people, you couldn’t say I don’t serve gay people, you couldn’t say I don’t serve Jews.”
The police were called in the incident and led Dershowitz away.
“When he came to our booth, I experienced a surge of emotion. As a chef, I love to share what I cook with the public, regardless of who they are. In this case, what was in the forefront of my mind was the fact that this was the high-profile attorney who represented several sexual predators and abusers including Jeffrey Epstein.”
Dershowitz is entirely in the right here, and the treatment that he received was outrageous. What is chilling is how hate is now celebrated on the left as a perverse type of virtue signaling.
We have seen how the left has embraced blacklisting, an abuse that was once associated with the McCarthy period. In 1950, columnist and civil libertarian Max Lerner penned a chilling prediction in the New York Post about the Red Scare: “There is a hate layer of opinion and emotion in America. There will be other McCarthys to come who will be hailed as its heroes.”
It turns out it would come from the left. From the start of the first Trump Administration, restaurants refused to serve well-known Republicans and their families.
Calls for blacklisting have come from city councils to public interest groups. Others called for banning those “complicit” from college campuses, while still others demanded a “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” to “hold Trump and his enablers accountable for the crimes they have committed.” Daily Beast editor-at-large Rick Wilson added his own call for “humiliation,” “incarceration,” and even ritualistic suicides for Trump supporters in an unhinged, vulgar column.
Writers and editors have joined blacklisting efforts targeting Trump supporters, conservative justices, and authors like JK Rowling for their political views. It is all part of the Orwellian logic of the left, intolerance in the name of tolerance, blacklisting in the name of free speech.
We have also seen lawyers increasingly targeted by the left for their clients, a tactic once used against liberal lawyers representing unpopular criminal or civil clients. That includes the successful targeting of a Harvard professor for representing Weinstein. Many leading lawyers helped fund the Lincoln Project in its national effort to harass and abuse any lawyers representing the Republican party or President Trump.
This week, President Trump even had to sign an executive order to deter “debanking” where financial institutions discriminate on the basis of political or religious views.
Now, back to Dershowitz. Liberals are applauding the denial of food to people who do not share their political views. Indeed, Miskevich is parading and posturing like the MLK of Martha’s Vineyard for joining the mob against a single, unpopular neighbor. Instead of treating food as a basis for shared dialogue and exchange, Miskevich wants to weaponize it to use against those who dare to hold opposing views.
What is particularly striking is how these are many of the same people who insisted that a Colorado baker should be required to make cakes that violate the owner’s religious and free speech rights. In Masterpiece Cakeshop and later cases like 303 Creative, the left hounded business owners for refusing to sell products that celebrated same-sex marriages. They were outraged that such denials are hateful and intolerant.
However, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, the owner insisted that he would sell cakes to same-sex couples and anyone else coming into his store. He only drew the line at preparing cakes expressly celebrating same-sex marriages as an expressive act that violated his core beliefs.
In this case, Miskevich is refusing to sell pre-made pierogi based on a political litmus test. It is not clear that this violates the law, but it is wrong. If Dershowitz asked Miskevich to cater a pierogi-based party in celebration of Trump, I would support his right to decline as a matter of free speech given his dislike for conservatives. However, this is the denial of service for pre-made pierogis based on viewpoint discrimination.
There is little doubt that Miskevich will haul in customers by pandering to the mob. The only thing that is more enticing today than the love for good food is the hate for opposing views. The problem is that feeding on hate will never satiate people; they simply want more servings. That insatiable appetite is destroying this country and now Miskevich is contributing to it one pierogi at a time.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of the best-selling book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.“
This column appeared on Fox.com
This guy who’s refusing service Dershowitz is 100 points short of the IQ of a lizard. The Jewish population of
Martha’s Vineyard is about 20,000. During the Summer the population swells to 200,000. Did it come to his mind that a good number of the summer visitors might be Jewish. It’s not so surprising that another leftist would shoot himself in the foot. I would not be surprised to find that they have a special school to train these fools in the art of eggheadedness.
TIT
It’s not because he’s a Jew, it’s because he doesn’t agree with his politics. Like most things, if people want what he’s selling, it won’t matter, as long as it doesn’t affect the cost to them. No one really cares about Dershowitz…
Don’t progressive liberals force bakers to bake cakes for gay couples? Or call a man a woman? WOW!
dirtydog1776…………Bless their little hearts. You’ll have to forgive them. Hypocrisy at that level gets so confusing and is extremely difficult to follow!
Pedo Island vs Martha’s Vineyard Island
The Powers to be:
They Weaponized it (approved the Honey Pot Operation – Set Epstein et.al. to work),
then They turned around and Villainized it (Condemned all the Participants – Clients & Epstein et.al.). The operation wasn’t Redlined and Intelligence knew it – that’s not failure, that’s complicity and more importantly ‘exploitation’ (sexual exploitation of underage women). It’s the kind of ‘sick mentality’ that the Intelligence Community subscribes & succumbs to. But since it’s ‘Covert-Ops’ it’s Ok.
Remarkable:
‘Oh buy the way, Here’s an Island where you can go have sex with under-age women and get away with it’.
That concept doesn’t add up to begin with, dose it. No reasonable/rational man would think this conscionable.
Yet a number of men fell into this Pot.
These Sexual Predators need to stand before the Law(s) and be sentenced for their crimes, regardless of whom they are or whom they think they are.
The Women, now sit in Prison (Mentally), Ghislaine Maxwell literally, while these men walk freely amongst our world to prey. Their impunity mustn’t be allowed to continue. They (the Perps) must all be round up.
Good for Martha’s Vineyard for taking a stand against all those involved.
Get a Clue Anon!
Didn’t the almighty Supreme Court idol Ruth Bader Ginsberg advocate for the age of consent to be lowered to 12 years of age? Gee whiz Einstein, I mean Epstein!
“The problem is that feeding on hate will never satiate people; they simply want more servings.” Well said
The “toddler taliban” as I call them, strikes again. I’ll bet Chef Krem exudes the zenith of moral authority as he stands there in his apron and toque, stomping his little feet, and waving his rolling pin in the air.
Stupid comment.
Oh, what a tough, brave person you are to diss someone, as you hide behind the “anonymous” moniker.
You’re a coward and a loser.
“Beto O’Rourke spoke to a crowd in Texas this weekend and made it clear that Democrats will do whatever it takes to regain power, saying ‘f**k the rules.’
***
O’Rourke also said that when Democrats regain power, they will immediately grant amnesty to illegals.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/repeat-loser-beto-orourke-tells-texas-crowd-democrats
As I have said before, this group of Democrats are essentially Bolsheviks and judging by the mass of declassified information thanks to Tulsi Gabbard they have been saying “f**k the rules” for a very long time. Still think they didn’t cheat in 2000? I think they did and are proud of it and will try it again and again, and again.
They will honor no gentlemanly compromise or law following their f**k the rules guiding dark angel.
Trump needs to crush them.
What do you mean “crush them”? Hopefully in elections. Even better, get Democrats to abandon their wacky ideas and militant tactics. Realistically, what do you expect? Maybe Trump could endorse some moderate Dems, and stop painting them all as just like AOC?
“Maybe Trump could endorse some moderate Dems, and stop painting them all as just like AOC?”
Since AOC is ideologically driving their party now, maybe Democrats could call her, the communists, and socialists, out themselves. Clean up your own house. Besides, given their irrational hatred of Trump, anyone he supported would be getting essentially an anti-endorsement.
Anon– “What do you mean “crush them”?”
Prosecute and imprison them for actual crimes they have committed. Tighten election security so that pulling another 2020 is harder. Our elections need to be honest. No illegal aliens counted in the census for congressional seats. Many things that are common sense, open, fair and honest.
I’m okay with crushing them however need be. As Barney Fife, one of our Nation’s highest most celebrated law enforcement officers stated in our historical documents, “You’ve got to nip it nip it nip it, nip it in the bud!”
Young
Did he ride his skateboard in and throw in some Spanish? He’s such a dill hole, I hope he runs for office again 🤣🤡
Dersch is right to use a male singular pronoun. “They/them” are plural pronouns. It’s ignorant to use a plural pronoun for a single person.
The only person using improper language is the clown demanding he be referred to with a plural pronoun.
Has it become clear that it is not really possible to debate or even speak with those on the left?
They will try to assault you with absurd positions and assertions then call you a racist, a homophobe, and so on instead of actually trying to converse. They are useless and dangerous, like monkeys with guns.
Maybe Dershowitz should bring Miskevich a cake to trade for the pierogies.
Or, they could settle the matter with a pierogie race.
https://youtu.be/8hDc075z3fc
Chef Krem Miskevich has barred the famed lawyer from buying pierogis because of his political views.
Go for it. I and everyone I know will cease doing business with The Pierogi King and each of us will tell 10 more friends to do the same. Those friends will contact 10 of their friends and soon we will have a checkers board with more abstinent pierogi eaters than there are grains of sand. Creme of The Krem Meathead Misky is about to learn the value the compounded numerical discrimination.
When a million unarmed, innocent citizens were being hacked to death in Rwanda, Creme Krem made one for Bill in the shape of a 337 foot cigar.
What a bunch of self righteous hypocrites! When the migrant plane landed in Martha’s Vineyard, the “glitter rich” Democrats gave them a sandwich and a sparkling water and bundled them up and carted them out in record time.
I bet you won’t find fentanyl zombies, hoards of illegals and homeless camping in the front yards in these exclusive “rich only” communities like Park City, Jackson Hole or Big Sky where the HOA is 300,000 per year.
Yet these jerks are happy to reek anarchy across the country by flooding the zone with millions of unvetted illegals and advocate for hardened criminals over the safety of U.S. citizens. These are crazy and dangerous people.
He is facing a lawsuit by one of the most brilliant lawyers in the nation. I guess they will see each other in court.
@E.M.
Yeah. Just like Manhattan, I think it’s safe to say there are no longer many if any ‘regular’ people living in MV. Kind of hard to take the spoiled babies seriously, particularly in regard to the rest of our massive country. First world problems, spoiled children.
Time to put on our Hippie Dippie threads and yonder up to Martha’s to begin sleeping on some beautiful green grass man. Can you dig it?
Geesh, I’d hate to be the pro-bono attorney who represented Charles Manson, who was a republican, just doing the govt’s work… What an idiot chef.
This chef apparently has no idea of Dershowitz’s wide and deep spectrum of legal representations over the decades. Does this moron not realize he’s likely going to pay one way or another, and that he’s opposing a famously proud Democrat? Does he hate our constitution? Is he one of these communist democrats?
“who goes by pronouns “they” and “them” ? POS would be better for him!
Where does freedom of association fit in in all of this?
It was a setup. Alan went there the day before and next time around engaged him and “bystanders” were ready with cell phones and cameras. He even brought a book for him. It will end up in court, I presume.
^ childish
Citations? 😊
OT
When you understand the Chinese structure of governance, you understand the American structure of governance of its Founders.
Never was a one-man, one-vote democracy intended by the Founders in America.
One-man, one-vote democracy does not exist in the People’s Republic of China.
The vote in America was severely restricted by the Founders, and the vote is severely restricted by the People’s Republic of China.
The critical difference between America and China is the concept of individual freedom as guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Primarily, Congress may tax only for debt, defense, and general Welfare, and Congress may only regulate “the value of money,” “commerce among nations, states, and Indian tribes,” and “land and naval Forces.”
And the people enjoy freedom, free enterprise, free industries, free markets, and the absolute right to private property.
One-man, one-vote democracy in America results in the illicit and unconstitutional nullification of the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the implementation of the self-destructive madness of the Communist Manifesto per the maxim, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” under the “dictatorship of the proletariat.”
The singular American failure is the judicial branch, with emphasis on the Supreme Court.
*. Isn’t there a one man one vote at the State, county, city, town levels? Isn’t that the reason States differ? I expect same sex marriage to be challenged by States. Marriage will be by State license like DLs?
“Isn’t there a one man one vote at the State, county, city, town levels?”
No, we are a republic. There are state representatives/senators, county commissioners, city councils, township supervisors, and school directors.
The one-man, one-vote does indeed exist in the United States, in all elections except one – the President. All state and local voting for governors, mayors, et al, is decided by popular vote – the person with the most votes wins.
Only the President is decided by the Electoral College,which was a brilliant stipulation in order to fairly represent all the states, and not let the President be elected based on a few high population cities.
You need to go back and read your civics lessons. Life is hard. And life is harder for the ignorant.
*. Thank you. It seems many are unhappy with their representatives. Look at the House of Lords and ladies with such stellar intelligences as rep fire alarm Bowman or nail salon tech Crockett.
It’s quite a shambles.
“All state and local voting for governors, mayors, et al, is decided by popular vote – the person with the most votes wins.”
That is still different than one man, one vote of a democracy. All those positions fit into representation in a republic.
My Momma always say: If you’re going to be stupid, you better be strong.
What do you propose? At least have the guts to say what you want to see happen. Is is a system where power and influence are kept in proportion to responsibility-taking for others? You could get some support behind that, but not if “responsibility-taking” is based on a group-average characteristic like race or gender. It would have to granular at the level of the individual.
There are good arguments for that kind of meritocracy.
The crude approach to meritocracy our nation began with (where a person’s race and gender was the basis for perdicting ability to contribute) is obsolete. But, we could aspire to a more fine-grained meritocracy based on what each person can do, or can reasonably learn to do. I think most Americans realize it has to work that way.
Those who support pure socialism or communism in America are greatly outnumbered by those who believe in a post-racial, post-gender meritocracy.
Just as those who wish to bring back a race-based, gender-based caste system are greatly outnumbered by those who find the idea repugnant.
There never was anything “racial” or “gendered”; it was always FREEDOM, which translates to “the pursuit of happiness,” or talent, capacity, ambition, effort, and MERIT!
In the context of America and American Freedom, THAT IS ALL.
The “rule of the collective,” or the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” was never freedom and was never constitutional.
I recall my aunt decided to get a real estate license in the early ’60s. By law, her husband had to sign the papers giving his approval. Before that post-WWII, there simply weren’t ant real estate women agents in America. That, and just about all professional “pursuits of happiness based on ambition” (except for teaching, care-giving and maid service) were denied to women. You say it was by custom, but the Constitution was of no help to women with frustrated ambition.
My grandmother was a very smart, aware woman who was resentful her entire life because her parents wouldn’t send her to college because of her gender.
Your notion of “freedom” extending back to the founding era (1780s) is just ignorant and steeped in false narratives. Freedom had to wait for the late 1900s to come to fuller fruition (for most every American). And when I think about today….gangs, sex slavery, identity theft, and ransomware attacks, there are pockets of tyranny still left to be vanquished. Freedom must include freedom from criminal victimization, or else it is a hollow promise.
And what about Americans who will be born 200 years from now? What of their freedoms, starting with the freedom to be watered and fed without being poisoned by chemicals disposed of irresponsibly by prior generations “pursuing their freedom”?
The proper balance of freedom and order, of opportunity and responsibility…these are still being worked out. Ideologies are not helping to see the challenges clearly.
Those were decisions made by free people.
There never was anything “racial” or “gendered” [in the Constitution]; it was always FREEDOM, which translates to “the pursuit of happiness,” or talent, capacity, ambition, effort, and MERIT!
You changed the context.
American women used to make babies. The 2024 U.S. fertility rate is at a record low. The fertility rate is in a “death spiral,” as is America. America is running out of Americans, which is the purview of women. I guess that was an oversight by God. Women hate women. Women want to be men. How the —- does America deal with women who won’t make Americans?
Take your pick. Existence or a real estate license.
Do you want me to talk? Why no Mr. Bond, I want you to die.
*. A passing grade in college physics?
Lawyers would argue the laws of physics and lobby DC to change them in the name of Science.
If the Constitution were supported by the Supreme Court, there would be rational restrictions on the vote by state legislatures, as per the intent of the Founders, and there would be no need for the parasitic poor to vote due to the fact that all of the redistribution they vote for is unconstitutional and would have been struck down by the Supreme Court long ago.
The entire communist American welfare state is unconstitutional, including, but not limited to, admissions affirmative action, grade-inflation affirmative action, employment affirmative action, quotas, welfare, food stamps, minimum wage, rent control, social services, forced busing, public housing, utility subsidies, CRT, DEI, WIC, SNAP, TANF, HAMP, HARP, TARP, PBS, NPR, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Agriculture, Education, Labor, Energy, Obamacare, Social Security, Social Security Disability, Social Security Supplemental Income, Medicare, Medicaid, “Fair Housing” laws, “Non-Discrimination” laws, etc.
Article 1, Section 8, provides Congress the power to tax for ONLY debt, defense, and “general Welfare”—ALL” or THE WHOLE WELL PROCEED through governmental provision of security and basic infrastructure—omitting and, thereby, excluding any power to tax for individual Welfare, specific Welfare, particular Welfare, favor, or charity. The same Article enumerates and provides Congress the power to regulate ONLY the Value of money, Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes, and land and naval Forces.
Further, the 5th Amendment right to private property was initially qualified by the Framers and is, therefore, absolute, allowing no further qualification and allowing ONLY the owner the power to “claim and exercise” dominion over private property.
Government exists, under the Constitution and Bill of Rights, to provide maximal freedom to individuals, while government is severely limited and restricted to facilitating that maximal freedom of individuals through the provision of security and infrastructure.
The Necessary and Proper Clause is nothing more than a perfunctory redundancy for the purposes of clarification—a reinforcement of that which was previously codified—and may not be wielded to amend and impose separate acts that do not represent but alter the letter and spirit of the Founders and Framers.
Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto 59 years after the adoption of the Constitution because none of the principles of the Communist Manifesto were in the Constitution. Had the principles of the Communist Manifesto been in the Constitution, Karl Marx would have had no reason to write the Communist Manifesto. The principles of the Communist Manifesto were not in the Constitution then, and the principles of the Communist Manifesto are not in the Constitution now.
Almost nobody in America wants to go backwards to a definition of “private property” in the founding era, which allowed owning and selling human beings as property. You sound like one of those few who does.
24% of the people in America are illegal aliens.
Try 12-13% using 42,000,000 illegal and 330,000,000 total population.
Prisons must still feed you no matter what heinous crimes you have committed.
I would add the the owner of Masterpiece Cake Shop, Jack Philips, also refused to make other cakes requested by an attorney who was harassing him, including a request for a cake of Satan smoking weed. Had Philips lost his multiple cases, then activists could force religious owners of bakeries and religious artists to quite literally glorify Satan against their will.
“an attorney called Masterpiece Cakeshop requesting that Phillips create a custom cake that would symbolize and celebrate a gender transition. The attorney then called again to request another custom cake, one depicting Satan smoking marijuana, to “correct the errors of [Phillips’] thinking.”
Phillips politely declined both requests because the cakes express messages that violate his core beliefs.”
https://adflegal.org/press-release/colorado-supreme-court-dismisses-lawsuit-harassing-cake-artist-jack-phillips/
*. Reason Islamic bakeries weren’t attacked?
Sounds like the planes and ferries with buses full of Illegal Antisemite’s need to start rolling, sailing and flying back into Martha’s Vineyard again.
When a few illegal immigrants were sent to Martha’s Vineyard, a so called sanctuary city, there was an uproar and they were immediately sent to a military base never to be seen again.
Illegals for thee, but not for me is the motto in Marth’s Vineyard.
Democrats have become rather infamous for this behavior. It’s an intolerant movement.
Statistics show that Democrats are more likely to cut off family and friends over political views than Republicans, and that’s certainly been my experience.
I do not think Democrats understand the bitterness with which their calls for a “return to civility” were met during Biden’s campaign against Trump in 2020. Democrats haven’t been civil towards Republicans in decades, long before the era of accusing Bush of wanting to “throw Grandma off a cliff.” Republicans think that Democrat policies do more harm than good, and tend to move closer to Socialism. Democrats think Republicans are Nazi fascist racist xenophobe bigots. No matter how many times you explain to Democrats that fascism requires a strong government at the expense of individual rights, the opposite of Republican political ideology, they still call us fascist. They will not listen that legal immigration is most comprised of non-whites; opposing illegal immigration still gets labeled xenophobic racist. Opposing the sterilization of children or males in locker rooms and women’s sports means you’re a bigot.
There’s no talking with people who think you’re evil if you disagree with them on any point. Dershowitz was a liberal Democrat for 70 years, and made many reasoned arguments in favor of old-fashioned liberalism, which focused on individual freedom. It was the growing antisemitism in the Democrat party that drove him out, to declare himself Independent. Once Dershowitz criticized the Mueller investigation against Trump, and stood against the Democrat anti-Israel, antisemitic stance, he became an enemy to the Democrat party and…you guessed it…evil.
Sigh. Again, there is only one party doing this, just one. And it isn’t the right or the independents. Our dems are insane and useless for everything BUT ripping the country apart. I would expect nothing less from the at this point; this is just yet another reminder in a very long list. It’s fine with me if they kick me out for not mirroring their idiotic ideology and hate back to them; I want nothing to do with them. The majority of us appear to be in agreement on that point, ‘Colbert’ may become yet another euphemism for failing spectacularly in tone-deafness and arrogance. We can add the entirety of Martha’s Vineyard as yet another, these people are wealthy clowns.
And this story may seem like fluff, but it’s important to continue shining the light, as they have only gotten worse with time.
I have Democrat relatives who believe every word of the Democrat Party and pundits, without question. They truly believed that President Trump was going to send Jews to concentration camps when he won election in 2016. They were unresponsive when told Trump has a Jewish daughter, SIL, and children, and was close with Netanyahu. It was like they were glassy eyed. Sincerely panicked for the Jewish community…yet at the same time, they were in total denial of the rising antisemitism in the Democrat Party, which has crested to the point that Jews fear to tread in deep blue NYC.
I asked a Democrat relative why Democrats feel so comfortable accusing Republicans of the most awful character flaws instead of just debating the policy points they disagree with, like saying if you oppose illegal immigration you’re a bigot, instead of giving justification for illegal immigration. He claimed that Republicans do the same, and when pressed, he said Republicans often accuse Democrats and Democrat policies as Socialist. I would give Exhibit A, the rise of the Democrat Socialist Party, popularity of Democrat Socialist AOC, Democrat Socialist Zohran Mamdani, the push for UBI and government housing, among many examples that this is in fact a justified criticism.
*. Brain scan for chip implants?
They want men in women’s locker rooms and showers, they want to sexually mutilate kids, they want to defund the police, they want to kill America’s energy sector, they want the border open to criminal thugs and gangs and sleeper cell infiltrators and fentanyl trafficking and child sex trafficking, they want forever wars and to risk nuclear annihilation over who gets a couple Russian-speaking provinces in eastern Europe, they want a censorship regime with the government colluding with social media companies to suppress contrary views, they want people debanked and deplatformed who wont comply with Big Brother’s edict that everyone must inject themselves with an experimental and risky cocktail of chemicals, they favor governmental waste, fraud and abuse, they want deep state corruption and the weaponization of the justice system against political opponents. And so much more. Sheesh, they are the very face of destruction and evil.
*. “They” don’t want any of it. They just want to force it onto you because they know it’s repulsive to you.
** Better to force them to read your idiotic comments
Thank you, anon. The flowers are beautiful. Nice of you to say such ☺
Sounds like some of these fragile Vineyard lefties wouldn’t adapt well to the strong Wisconsin community wherein I reside.
Alan Dershowitz is deserving of respect and appreciation.
Chef Miskevich should lay off politics and stick to making dumplings.
It’s a thought.
.
.