Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Cal.) will not be outdone again. Recently, Swalwell was outvoted in Congress by a colleague who had died months earlier. Now, he is ensuring that, when it comes to violating the Constitution, no one is even close. This week, Swalwell pledged that, if elected California governor, he will arrest ICE officers and take away their driver’s licences.
On MS NOW’s “All In,” Swalwell was asked by host Jason Johnson: “What would you do if you are able to be elected as governor of California? … What would you bring to the table as a governor of California?”
Swalwell responded:
“Well, you have immense powers as governor of California and your responsibility to protect the most vulnerable in the state. So if the president is going to send ICE agents to chase immigrants through the fields where they work, what I’m going to do is make sure that they take off their masks and show their faces, that they show their identification. And if they commit crimes that they’re going to be charged with crimes, if it’s falsely imprisoning people, if it’s kidnapping, if it’s assault battery, they’re going to be held accountable. I also think if the governor has the ability to issue driver’s licenses to people in California, if you’re going to wear a mask and not identify yourself, you’re not going to be eligible to drive a vehicle in California. There’s a lot you can do, but most importantly, you have to go on offense. Otherwise, the most vulnerable in our community will always be on defense.”
Democrats appear to be morphing into predecessors like Gov. George Wallace (D., Ala.), pledging to defy federal authority and bar federal agents from their states. Wallace also reportedly threatened to arrest federal officers (and then later backed down when he was threatened with court action).
In an “age of rage,” the most irate and irrational reigns supreme.
From demanding that any Democratic nominee pledge to demolish the new Trump ballroom to opposing parental rights in schools, Swalwell has struggled to find traction with far-left California voters.
However, he is now promising to violate the Constitution. That did not take long. We do not even have a clear idea of who will be the frontrunners in the election. It is like a game of chicken where Swalwell immediately drives off the cliff before anyone gets into their cars.
Ironically, it is precisely what he has accused Donald Trump of doing: disregarding the Constitution when it suits his political agenda.
In case it matters to anyone left in California, he cannot do this. Seizing federal agents sort of went out of constitutional style after the Civil War. The “immense powers as governor of California” do not include dictating what federal officers can wear on their faces or bodies.
The first tiny barrier to Swalwell’s antebellum policies is the Supremacy Clause, which prevents states from “interfering with or controlling the operations of the Federal Government.” United States v. Washington (2022). Since McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, the Supreme Court has consistently struck down state laws that impede federal enforcement.
Moreover, immunity under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) bars criminally charging officials who are properly carrying out their lawful federal duties. For example, in 1890, the Supreme Court ruled In re Neagle that a U.S. Marshal had immunity when a state tried to charge him with murder after he shot and killed an individual attacking a justice.
While the Supreme Court has also stressed that federal immunity does not afford federal employees carte blanche to violate any and all state laws, it has made clear that such state limits must be incidental and nonintrusive. In Johnson v. Maryland (1920), Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explained:
“It very well may be that, when the United States has not spoken, the subjection to local law would extend to general rules that might affect incidentally the mode of carrying out the employment — as, for instance, a statute or ordinance regulating the mode of turning at the corners of streets. Commonwealth v. Closson, 229 Mass. 329. This might stand on much the same footing as liability under the common law of a state to a person injured by the driver’s negligence. But even the most unquestionable and most universally applicable of state laws, such as those concerning murder, will not be allowed to control the conduct of a marshal of the United States acting under and in pursuance of the laws of the United States. Ex parte Neagle, 135 U. S. 1.”
None of this really matters to Swalwell. He is moving from democrat to demagogue in pledging unconstitutional acts to be sure that no one is farther to the left in the California race. It is the same “politics of contempt” that he has displayed as a member of Congress. Swalwell has always distinguished himself by doing things that few others could stomach, such as mocking a female senator over the death threats that she was receiving from irate liberals.
He also may be right about California voters. While others are struggling to come up with ideas for a state that is facing a crushing debt crisis and top taxpayers fleeing the state, Swalwell is promising chest-pounding theatrics…more jester than governor. He will entertain and distract with measures that will be struck down in courts.
It is the modern equivalent of the Roman games, promising combat with federal officers to thrill the crowd. From California and New York, there is an insatiable appetite for lawfare and disruption. Swalwell will promise chaos and confrontation … and many California voters will love him for it.
If a federal agent kills a Minneapolis resident under any circumstances, the State’s police powers under the Constitution permit the State investigate the crime, while the State’s law in fact demands it. McCulloch v. Md. has nothing to do with it.
Turley is a piece of shit
I live in California and once considered myself a progressive. The so called progressive Democrats in my state remind me of the Stalinists I used to read about in my history books. It’s depressing that California politics is not longer worth bothering about. This a a party state and no different than the PRI that ran Mexico for 70 years. Democrats don’t remotely believe in Democracy. THey are about power. Period.
Democrats into “power”. Look at what Trump does. You’ve been listening to FAUX News too much. Change channels.
What bothers me the most about this guy is the people who voted for him.
My brother voted for him because he’s a Democrat and totally clueless about his political positions. My brother is a decent guy who knows football and surfing but really not much else. The media in California is a party media and voters like my brother are the norm. There is no hope for California and it appears things will likely trend worse. The media is beyond worthless and people are ignorant.
My sister as well. Being jewish, she would literally vote for Adolph Hitler if he ran for office with a “D” by his name.
I understand that ICE agents wear no ID. So 1) How does Swalwell know who to arrest and 2) how can they be considered agents of the US president protected from state interference in their activities?
There is not necescarily a requirement for an LEO to identify themselves.
But you can not be charged for failure to follow their directions or resisting arrest if they dfo not identify as police.
Nearly always LEO’s have POLICE boldly display on their chest and back.
Officers are required to specifically identify themselves if they arrest someone, but that does not mean an observer on the street can demand ID,
or that someone being arrested can do so while resisting arrest.
The state has Zero power over Federal Agents. Those who interfere with an arrest or investigation, risk arrest and a permanent criminal record. His statement highlights that he is clueless. The only purpose for such a bizarre statement is simply political.
ICE To Spend $100 Million On Recruitment
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials are planning to spend $100 million over a one-year period to recruit gun rights supporters and military enthusiasts through online influencers and a geo-targeted advertising campaign, part of what the agency called a “wartime recruitment” strategy it said was critical to hiring thousands of new deportation officers nationwide, according to an internal document reviewed by The Washington Post.
The Department of Homeland Security has spoken publicly about its fast-tracked effort to significantly increase ICE’s workforce by hiring more than 10,000 new employees, a surge promoted on social media with calls for recruits willing to perform their “sacred duty” and “defend the homeland” by repelling “foreign invaders.” The agency currently employs more than 20,000 people, according to ICE’s website.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/12/31/ice-wartime-recruitment-push/
……………………………………
It seems like only yesterday American conservatives harbored deep fears of ‘big government’. But now our far-right president is building what many might call a ‘political army’ not that different from Hitler’s SS.
As the above article tells us, this recruitment campaign is definitely focused on recruiting MAGA types whose loyalty to Trump will certainly factor in the hiring process.
Anyone who thinks this new ICE will be limited to only rounding up ‘illegals’ is terribly naive. One can scarcely doubt Trump will expand the role of ICE to ‘domestic security concerns (Trump’s hold on power).
Yet Johnathan Turley sees ICE as a righteous force whose motives are beyond question. And anyone daring to question ICE is comparable to Jim Crow segregationists.
Biden administration should not have let in 15 Million unvetted illegals– ANON!!
ICE is LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
They are not a political army.
As the supreme court has decided that Presidents can not use the National Guard to protect Federal Law Enforcement from Violent attacks – weirdly the Majority seems to think that the president CAN use the Regular Military – as Alito Thomas and Gorsuch pointed out the majority decision is complete idiocy flies in the fact of nearly a century of precident, and creates circumstances that would drive Presidents to use the Army rather than the National Guard.
Regardless, while this decision merely upholds a TRO – it is not actually a final decision on the merits – and sometime in 2027 the real case may get to SCOTUS and they may come to their senses, in the mean time Trump has withdrawn the national guard.
So we can expect in the short run an increase in violence by those on the left. Without NG forces to protect them more ICE officers are going to be injured and possibly even killed by loony left wing crowds. This also increases the odds that some ICE agent under extreme stress does something stupid.
Regardless one way or the other – we are going to get MORE violence.
To those on the left I would note that if the violence increases at some point the president will likely invoke the insurection act and call out the army. And that will with near certinty force SCOTUS to rethink a stupid decision
But within probably 90 days the additional ICE agents will be trained and available, and they will essentially replace the NG – with the exception that unlike the NG -they Will have Law Enforcement and arrest powers rather than merely the power to use force to protect LEO’s being threatened.
“it seems like only yesterday American conservatives harbored deep fears of ‘big government’”
Correct – and they still do. 300,000 Federal emplo0yees have been Riffed in 2025 with more to come.
The size of the federal government is being reduced.
Not as much as many of us would like. Musk beleives that easily half of federal employees are unnecescary.
And he is pretty good at efficient managment.
The new ICE agents will be small numbers compared to continuing Reductions throughout the Federal government.
Yes conservatives want smaller govenrment – government that is NOT engaged in functions that are NOT in the constitution.
While adding sufficient forces to perform the tasks that ARE in the constitution.
Securing the Security and enforcing existing Immigration law are absolutely executive powers within the constitution.
“But now our far-right president is building what many might call a ‘political army’ not that different from Hitler’s SS.”
Nope, ICE agents can only enforce immigration laws. If you are not an illegal immigrant and you do nothing to interfere with those ICE agents enforcing immigration law – they have no authority over you.
They are authorized to enforce Federal Immigration law – they are not a military force. Nor can they act outside of immigration law.
“As the above article tells us, this recruitment campaign is definitely focused on recruiting MAGA types”
Do you really think that Tyler Robinson, or Abrego Garcia are going to apply for an ICE job.
“whose loyalty to Trump will certainly factor in the hiring process.”
Nope, The requirements for ICE officers are the same as other law enforcement. ICE will prefer existing or prior law enforcement, or military – particularly military police. If they can not get sufficient numbers from those sources they will be using the same criteria used to recruit new LEO’s all over the country. Familiarity with Guns and Gun laws and the legitimate use of guns is likely to be important – no one want ICE agents to misuse firearms.
It is likely that new hires will be “loyal” to Trump – how many left wing nuts do you expect to apply to work in ICE ?
But politics will not be a criteria for hiring – only willingness to enforce the law.
But that alone will self select for MAGA. Your not getting a job with ICE if you are not willing to enforce immigration laws.
“Anyone who thinks this new ICE will be limited to only rounding up ‘illegals’ is terribly naive.”
Why would someone expecting that ICE officers will follow the law be Naive ?
This administration has scrupulously followed he law and the courts – even when the courts are wrong about the law.
The National Guard has been sent home. They will be replace by new ICE agents.
And the job of enforcing immigration law will continue.
$100M is not going to hire enough new ICE agents to do anything beyond enforce immigration law and arrest those who interfere with the enforcement of immigration law.
“One can scarcely doubt Trump will expand the role of ICE to ‘domestic security concerns (Trump’s hold on power).”
You are free to beleive whatever you wish.
If Trump wanted more “domestic security” – he could hire more FBI agents.
You are demonstrating the typical stupidity of the left.
You are pretending that their is some hidden agenda, when the agenda is right out in the open – enforce immigration laws.
And where if Trump wanted to do what you are all affraid of – he would not be hiring ICE agents.
Trump has no “Hideen Agenda”
This is his ACTUAL AGENDA – he is incredibly open and transpaent about it.
It is what people voted for. Trump does not lie about what he intends to do. He has said exactly what he will do, and to the extent the courts have allowed – he has done exactly that.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform
“Yet Johnathan Turley sees ICE as a righteous force whose motives are beyond question.”
ICE officers “motives” are right out in the open – like every single LEO in the federal govenrment – to enforce the portions of federal law they are tasked with. ICE is tasked with enforcing immigration law – that is the “motive” of ICE officers.
Righteousness has nothing to do with it.
If you do not like US immigration laws – get congress to change them.
“And anyone daring to question ICE is comparable to Jim Crow segregationists.”
What is there to question ?
Is ICE doing something that US immigration law does not allow ?
If they are – please take that to court.
As we have seen – even when the courts make bad decisions – Trump may gripe and moan, but he follows those decisions.
He appeals lower court decisions – and usually wins. When SCOTUS speaks he does what they say – right or wrong.
That is what we want in a president. It is also what we want in all government employees.
One can scarcely doubt the Left’s power to create and embrace dystopian fantasies. Ignoring utterly that Congress created Immigration and Customs Enforcement purely to Enforce federal Immigration and Customs Law.and that extending their writ would require an additional act of Congress.
A Biden Democrat proclaimed: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials are planning to spend $100 million over a one-year period to recruit gun rights supporters and military enthusiasts – the opinion of the Second Amendment and military hating writers at The Washington Post (who STILL haven’t returned the Pulitizers they were awarded for lying about Obama’s fictional and felonious “Russia Dossier”)
Imagine the terror this strikes in the heart of the Washington Post’s most favored groups for police and military recruitment: the preferred and best qualified candidates for law enforcement! Yup, you got it: the Democrat-Mainstream Media Propaganda Complex’s prized class of Americans: the denizens of the Democrats’ Alphabet Sex Pride Tribe – and in particularly the elite among them who are the Furry Trannies.
As this post tells us, Democrat police state fascists only agree with police who are willing to (a) ignore felonies committed by Democrats and their families while in political office, and (b), members of law enforcement like Obama and Biden’s FBI who were more than eager to willingly become felons themselves in order to serve as the Democrats’ STASI, providing them with their own version of Lavarenti Beria : “Sir – show me the man and I’ll find you his crimes… or make them up if I can’t”.
Cue the hysterical Biden Bolshevik Birthing Boys’ warnings that Trump is about to proclaim martial law, throw Democrat politicians in jail (like Obama/Biden attempted to do with him and others before Trump) and cancel this year’s midterm elections.
“Johnathan Turley sees ICE as a righteous force whose motives are beyond question.”
Thank you Professor Turley for telling the truth about the amount of ICE officers needed to remove the 25 million (25,000,000) illegal aliens before they aid the democrats in continuing to ruin our wonderful country.
This is the man who fell for the infamous PRC spy Fang-Fang. Perhaps he might consider a tin hat and in a padded room? Yet, these are the people that get voted into office.
“Yet, these are the people that get voted into office” — I might add by voting machines and multiple absentee ballots mailed to all people in the state — alive or dead.
🌲
Here is a man who has kiss lips on his bathroom and bedroom, placed by his own lips admiring himself
Swalwell is pure democrat swine, without conscience or moral fiber – a perfect representative of what today’s democrat party is, corrupt and unpatriotic.
Ring in the New Year at the brand new Trump-Kennedy Center tonight, featuring a performance by the delightful Epstein Dancers !!!!!
https://www.trumpkennedycenter.org/
Tough guy Swalwell?? He can barely lift 100 lbs!
15 MILLION UNVETTED let into the U.S. THAT’S A REAL CRIME!!!
On top of the 24M that were already ILLEGAL here.
Happy New Year to all 🎊🎈🎆 🎉 !
Wishing you all a healthy 2026 filled with happiness and joy
Thank you OMFK!😜
Right back at ‘ya from another old man from Kansas
Thanks OMFK, from an old man formerly from MA.
update.
President Trump said he will end the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, Chicago and Portland, Ore.
The deployments have been repeatedly challenged in court, but Trump said the troops drove down crime. He suggested they might return in the future.
“We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again—Only a question of time!” he said on Truth Social.
*new year resolution #3: you can lead a Jack-a** to water .. . but you can’t make them drink.
. Much stronger form? The actual army I suppose. I’m sorry he didn’t carry this forward. He’s correct.
This was a huge mistake by SCOTUS.
While I think the “decision” was correct – the basis for the decision was not.
The lower courts issued a TRO – I beleive they WRONGLY issued that TRO, But it was NOT a nationwide injunction, and it did not have the flaws that the TROs and preliminary injunctions of prior courts had.
SCOTUS should simply have said that they do not have sufficient record and it is currently imappropriate for SCOTUS to rul on the merits, and the TRO stands. DOJ can address the merrits in the lower court and AFTER they have issued a funal rulling on the merits that can go throuhg the normal appeals process and SCOTUS will address the merits then.
What they have done is practically Beg Trump to call in the army.
And no one in their right mind wants the Army called in to do peacekeeping in the US before the NG.
Maybe Trump should do what Obama was going to do. Set up a federal police force (approximately 250,000 men and women). That will supersede the FBI and other federal agencies in scope and power. And as fully equipped as the US army. Then he would virtually have at his disposal his own police force to be called up when needed. But Trump won’t do this, that’s what dictators do.
dgsnnowden. In a Bizzare Ruling SCOTUS said that Trump must use the regular military before the NG.
Ignoring the massive historic and constitutional error there.
What you are likely to see is Trump doing what SCOTUS has directed and send in the Army or Marines.
Though it is possible that Congress can clean this up. All they have to do is add a clarification to the existing federal law that states that the “regular forces” that are unable to enforce the law referenced in the law allowing the use of the NG are LEO’s not the army.
The recent supreme court decision hinges on the absurd legal interpretation that the president must call up the Army and they must fail before the MG can be called in by the president. It is a very bizarre decision – because that was not even before the court – the lower courts and both parties had all agreed that “regular forces” in the law meant LEO’s
So if we see a rise in violance against ICE as the NG pull out – then the regular military will be sent in – per the Supreme court.
John, though I’m not entirely certain, I don’t think the Court made a mistake. The President’s authority here is federal enforcement authority. He must be able to lawfully deploy federal forces in principle before he can deploy the National Guard in practice.
James, your little rant made no sense. Obviously you don’t understand the significance of Shakur’s militancy
X claims his rants and insults of Professor Turley make perfect sense. And in that same criminal Democrat world where X proudly lives, struts and flexes, Shakur’s violent criminal and black racist terrorist life is merely “militancy”
Terrorism and violent armed robberies are merely “militancy”. Just like criminal Illegal Aliens are merely “undocumented migrants”.
She faced life in prison for murder. She was already in prison for murder and escaped. Free v. Prison. Cuba v. Prison
Lauren Boebert At Odds With Trump
President Trump issued two vetoes this week, the first two of his second term, rejecting a pair of bipartisan bills and drawing pushback from Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.).
Boebert protested the president’s veto of the bill that would have bolstered the water project, called the Arkansas Valley Conduit, in her state.
President Trump decided to veto a completely non-controversial, bipartisan bill that passed both the House and Senate unanimously. If this administration wants to make its legacy blocking projects that deliver water to rural Americans; that’s on them,” Boebert said in a statement to Colorado’s 9News.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5667913-trump-vetoes-colorado-water-boebert-florida-tribe/
………………………………….
It is widely believed that Trump vetoed this water project to spite Colorado for refusing to release Tina Peters. Peters is the former elections clerk who allowed some MAGA operative (sent by Mike Lindell) to ‘examine’ voting machines days after the 2020 election.
Peters was convicted on state charges of tampering with voting machines. Trump has attempted to pardon Peters. However presidential pardons only apply to Federal charges. So Trump is determined to take every opportunity to screw Colorado!
Yet Johnathan Turley would have us believe that Donald Trump and ICE stand for the rule of law. And any state obstructing ICE is somehow in league with southern segregationists. What a leap! Like a campaign of mass deportations is the 2020’s equivalent of civil rights. Put down the Kool Aide, Turley!!
^ Paid DNC troll. Ignore. ^
More likely an overpaid, blue state, Somali daycare administrator troll. Obviously, one of those would have more than enough leisure time to haunt blog comment sections posting idiocy.
Sweetie, you got what you wished. You’ll never have to see the United States of America again in this life or the next. Congratulations…
. I can’t help but note how misinterpreted the scriptures were, are. Translation I guess and changes made over time. You beat your guns into plows not because of peace but for starvation and lack of metals.
Congrats dims , the dumbest people in the world.
Have a lucky new year
🌲
It is widely believed that Trump vetoed this water project to spite Colorado for refusing to release Tina Peters.
It’s widely believed by Democrat apparatchiks, propagandists and liars that they can sell any Biden/Schiff grade BS about Trump whether it’s their Russia Dossier or this lie.
The Veto does not block the project – it blocks a change requiring a shift to federal funding.
VETO’s anything passed by congress is “following the rule of law” i.e. the constitution.
If this is truly something 2/3 of congress wants – they can override the veto.
Personally we should stop federal funding for state or regional projects outside the role of the federal govenrment.
If the states wish to go forward with this – they can fund it.
“It is widely believed that Trump vetoed this water project to spite Colorado for refusing to release Tina Peters.”
Possibly. So what ?
“Peters is the former elections clerk who allowed some MAGA operative (sent by Mike Lindell) to ‘examine’ voting machines days after the 2020 election.”
Aside from the Spin – correct.
“Peters was convicted on state charges of tampering with voting machines. ”
Correct – and that conviction should be overturned.
Examine and tamper are not the same thing.
Tamper requires CHANGE. What was actually done was the records were copied and a forensic examination of the copy was started.
I would note that though most states make it very hard to do so – election information is PUBLIC RECORD.
“Trump has attempted to pardon Peters.”
No he did pardon Peters
“However presidential pardons only apply to Federal charges. ”
The constitution delegates Federal elections to the federal and state government.
This is also an issue that is currently being addressed favorablyf for Trump in the NYC Bragg case.
Federal law is supreme in the US. Federal election law Trumps state election law.
“So Trump is determined to take every opportunity to screw Colorado!”
Fine by me.
CO must ends its partisan witch hunt and returns to properly enforcing election law rather than persucuting those that attempt ro
I would note there were similar cases elsewhere – there was one in GA involving Sydney Powel – that was dismissed by GA courts, because it was a federal election.
In the end – your going to lose on this. Peters is going to be free – whe is likely to have a federal wrongful imprisonment case.
It is likely that DOJ is already seeking copies of the Election records that CO tried to hide.
The real question is Why is CO so desparately trying to hide the election records ?
It is already crystal clear that the 2020 Election in GA from illegally decided.
Fulton County did not follow GA election law and could not certify 315,000 of the votes from Fulton County.
While the Fannie Willis and Jack Smith cases against Trump have been dismissed, this clearly establishes that Trump had every right to demand that the GA election be thoroughly scrutinized.
Without the signoffs on the initial zeroing of the machine and the final tallies from the machines.
Fulton Country had Several choices:
A machine recount of those ballots – those of you on the left claimed that there was a recount in GA – there was NOT,
The only county wide recount in the US was in AZ – and that from nearly 50,000 ballots from only 13,000 people
Regardless the fact is that the left LIED about GA actually conducting a “Recount”.
They conducted a recanvas – which is NOT an actual recount. And they did that improperly.
A hand recount of the 315,000 ballots.
Or go to court and get a judge to order the ballots that have no certification by election officials to be counted.
The proper choice would be a hand recount.
We do not know – though we MIGHT find out, whether those ballots were counted properly and whether they were legitimate,
but there are credible allegations that there are large numbers of dumplicate ballots in this 315K and that there are enormous number of ballots that voted for Biden and no other office that is highly unusual and when present in large scale is an indicator of fraud.
regardless, you have lost the claim that 2020 was a free and fair election – it was the most corrupt and lawless election int he past century.
And you can expect that the Trump administration is doing everything possible to further expose that.
So have fund.
If you wish to continue to make a Martyr out of peters and make yourselves look corrupt – go for it.
Also John Say, Fulton clowny began destroying ballots, 17,000 or 15,000 before told to stop. Their reason fir destruction was the law didn’t say couldn’t.
There are some instances in some states where because of court challenges or because of criminal prosecutions that are still subject to appeal records have been retained.
But as a matter of federal and most state law the records of an election must only be retained for 22months.
That has long passed.
Peters is in jail and has ongoing appeals – that means the evidence in her case MUST be preserved.
The Fulton County prosecution of Trump was stalled but not dropped until recently – that means r4ecords had to be maintained because of an ongoing criminal case.
But the moment Fulton county dropped the case – the 2020 Election records could be destroyed.
I expect to see more evidence of corruption in the 2020 case.
But with very few exceptions you are NOT going to see DOJ gaining access to fraudulent ballots, or machine tabulations.
Except where there are ongoing civil or criminal cases.
It is likely all of that has been destroyed already. PA began illegally destroying 2020 election records before Biden was sworn in.
But in other cases records even ballots have been found in elections many years old – because quite often Govenrment is too lazy to act.
DOJ is currently going after voter registration records in all 50 states. Federal Law requires the states to provide the federal govenrment with access to voter registration reocords. Blue states are vigorously resisting – which is weird because in most cases these records are public records – anyone willing to pay for them can have them. The political parties routinely request and are given voter registration records.
Regardless, expect to have a year of news stories about dead people on voter registration records or how many times Mckey Mouse is registered in CO or how many times some illegal alien has voted.
Voter reqistration records can not tell you about how a vote was cast.
But it cn tell you about how many illegal voters actually voted.
Regardless the fact is that the left LIED about GA actually conducting a “Recount”.
They conducted a recanvas – which is NOT an actual recount. And they did that improperly.
John, what are you referring to here? All news reports, including the official announcements by the secretary of state, said it was a full hand recount of every single ballot in the state. What information do you have that this was not the case?
John, here’s a report from the time that it happened, before the results were in, that describes it as an “audit” conducted by hand-counting every single ballot.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/recount-or-audit-whats-happening-on-the-ground-in-georgia/
“the Arkansas Valley Conduit”
You lie (by omission) so fluidly.
That conduit is a 130-mile pipeline that was authorized in *1962*. The locals couldn’t build that water pipeline in 60 years. And you’re blaming Trump?! If they have to lug water in buckets, it’s their own fault.