Pennsylvania state and socialist Chris Rabb, the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania’s 3rd Congressional District, has joined the growing chorus of Democrats denouncing the founding documents and core institutions in the country on our 250th anniversary. The Democratic socialist is running unopposed for Congress and will almost certainly be a member of Congress after November.
Rabb spoke at an event billed as “America at 250 — Trump Fascism, Historical Erasure, and the Battle Over Truth” at People’s Plaza on Independence Mall in Philadelphia.
He denounced the country as based on “stolen land and stolen labor.” He lashed out at the Declaration of Independence:
“Those screeds that were very lofty but were notoriously catering to a performative aspect of collective genius that purposely erased indigenous and black peoples…It created distance from an empire to help very privileged people continue that privilege and ultimately institutionalize that through the U.S. Constitution many years later. But it certainly did not provide independence to indigenous and black peoples. And we cannot talk about anything today without acknowledging that this is a nation born on stolen land & stolen labor.”
It is entirely appropriate to raise the inherent conflict in the words of the Declaration and the continuation of slavery. In Rage and the Republic, I discuss the inherent hypocrisy of our Declaration in declaring natural rights without denouncing the enslaving of so many in the country:
“The Founders understood that inescapable truth of natural law when they signed a Declaration that ‘all men are created equal.’ Despite this defining line, even some who opposed slavery saw little hope for a revolution that would seek to overthrow both the monarchy and slavery. Jefferson would have to make the concession in striking critical language from his draft. While Jefferson’s legacy would be forever stained by his own maintenance of slaves, he did attempt to condemn the institution of slavery. He was rebuffed by his fellow delegates who were willing to acknowledge the existence of a natural law while ignoring its implications for the enslaved people in the new nation.”
Rabb goes further than raising the inherent conflict with slavery and suggests that our system is inherently fascistic and not worthy of celebration for the ideals that it articulated for a new nation.
He ignores how the Declaration laid the foundation for a more perfect union. Ours was the first major Enlightenment Revolution based on the belief that our rights came not from the government but from God. It embraced the principles that would ultimately prevail in ending this shameful stain on our nation.
“Fascism is not new. These systems of harm are built into the very fabric of this nation,..You cannot kill the beast until you name it. And that is difficult for many people who want to embrace certain tropes, certain narratives, whether it’s the American dream or American exceptionalism or the Protestant work ethic or so many other myths that do us no — they are a disservice.”
Rabb is not the first figure on the far left to denounce the “American dream” and “the Protestant work ethic” as harmful “myths.”
He pledged that he would be “one of the few unapologetic reparationists going to Congress,” joining a growing number of Democrats demanding billions in reparations for black Americans.
Many on the left are using the anniversary to condemn our founding principles or to decline to celebrate our Independence Day. This includes such demonstrations in states such as Massachusetts, which declined to join the celebration on the Mall for the 250th anniversary.
Recently, we discussed how a Massachusetts church ended the long-standing celebration of the Fourth of July to focus on the “on-going process within the congregation to better understand our own whiteness.”
John Adams once wrote his wife Abigail to predict that Independence Day would be:
“celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the Day of Deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations from one end of this continent to the other from this time forward forever more.”
Adams was virulently opposed to slavery as were many of the Founders. Many openly discussed their hope that the new nation would address slavery after it succeeded in establishing its independence. Those lofty values were ultimately realized at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives in the Civil War.
The claim that fascism is a system “built into the very fabric of this nation” is absurd and demagogic. This nation defeated fascism and remains the oldest and most successful republic in history. Indeed, the left is claiming to be fighting fascism while seeking to take over the Supreme Court in a court-packing scheme while limiting such core human rights as free speech.
In “killing the beast,” the far left is threatening to unleash the very forces that destroyed the contemporary revolution in France at the time of our founding. These voices are not new. They have been part of this republic — and other republics — throughout history. They are the voices of mobocracy that we rejected 250 years ago. That is precisely why Benjamin Franklin was right that this is, and will remain, our Republic to keep.
Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the New York Times best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”
The Left appears to be unaware that most of the world in 1776 practiced, approved of, and promoted slavery. All major European nations participated in the African slave trade, where African slaves were purchased from other Africans and sold to Arab and European slave traders. Europeans did not hunt and capture African slaves; the health dangers were too great for extended stays inland. In the rest of the world, slavery was widely practiced: Russia, China, the Indian subcontinent, all of the Western hemisphere, particularly among indigenes. Slavery was not about race: It arose from the age-old rules of war and the evil in the human heart.
Jefferson and the writers of the Constitution were prescient, although often conflicted, about slavery. They limited the power of the slave states through the 3/5th compromise and by setting a limit to the trans-Atlantic slave trade as of 1805. Meanwhile in Great Britain, Wilberforce and others, motivated by American Methodists and Quakers, were driving public opinion toward abolition of slavery in British colonies and towards interdiction of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Defeat of Napoleon’s eurocrats was crucial to this effort.
The Declaration of Independence set the stage for the advances in human freedom that have been a major theme of American’s history. The current mania for tribalism, identitarianism, central command and control of the economy, are reactionary attempts to return us to the world before 1776. Our fireworks and our flags and our parades amplify our insistence that we are not going back,
Thank you, Anonymous. That was informative. Your understanding of the purpose, context, and effect of the DoI puts the know-nothing leftist complaints against that document to shame. I only wish you’d use a screen name.
Not only did a large part of the world engage in slavery in 1776, but afaik , with one notable exception, every single one of those nations (at least in the Western world) managed to end the practice of slavery without fighting a major civil war that resulted in the deaths of 2.5% of its population, e.g. 750,000 lives lost. That is imo food for thought, and a debate for another day.
Anthropology hadn’t been invented.
Unfortunately, this falls of the Left’s dead ears because they look at all history through the lens of presentism, thereby lazily and shallowly getting to ignore context and the POV of that time. This enables them to view history as all negative to further their agendas, while the non-presentists see how far we’ve come in progress.
The 3/5ths compromise didn’t limit the power of the slave holders, it gave them representation that was stolen from the slaves. Curtailing the trans-Atlantic trade merely drove the South to breed humans as they would a farm animal.
Read the articles of Confederation – American slavery was entirely about race.
Trump’s shenanigans are a million times worse than Nixon’s were.
Trump should have resigned already.
Typical brain-dead TDS comment, generically saying, “Mommy, I hate Trump, make him go away, waaa waaa waaa.”
But you said zip about Biden’s and O-dumber’s (shenanigans)
Putin thinks this is funny.
Should he have the right and freedom to participate in the political system?
Should voters have the freedom to vote for whoever they want representing them?
Typical brain-dead comment. Whenever professor Turley holds something up to the light of day for a critique, the airhead leftist says, “shouldn’t that person have a right to do that?”
Until relatively recently, the vote has been restricted since the inception of democracy in Greece in 508 B.C. The Founders restricted the vote in 1789, and turnout was 11.6% by design. The vote was intended to be restricted by state legislatures in perpetuity.
One-man, one-vote “democracy” is the “dictatorship of the majority,” “the dictatorship of the poor,” and “the dictatorship of the proletariat” of Karl Marx.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“the people are nothing but a great beast…
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value.”
– Alexander Hamilton
_________________________
“The true reason (says Blackstone) of requiring any qualification, with regard to property in voters, is to exclude such persons, as are in so mean a situation, that they are esteemed to have no will of their own.”
“If it were probable that every man would give his vote freely, and without influence of any kind, then, upon the true theory and genuine principles of liberty, every member of the community, however poor, should have a vote…
But since that can hardly be expected, in persons of indigent fortunes, or such as are under the immediate dominion of others, all popular states have been obliged to establish certain qualifications, whereby, some who are suspected to have no will of their own, are excluded from voting; in order to set other individuals, whose wills may be supposed independent, more thoroughly upon a level with each other.”
– Alexander Hamilton, The Farmer Refuted, 1775
______________________________________________________
“[We gave you] a republic, if you can keep it.”
– Ben Franklin, 1787
Proclamation 80—Calling Forth the Militia and Convening an Extra Session of Congress
“On April 15, 1861,…President Abraham Lincoln issued a proclamation calling forth the state militias, to the sum of 75,000 troops, in order to suppress the rebellion. He appealed ‘to all loyal citizens to favor, facilitate, and aid this effort to maintain the honor, the integrity, and the existence of our National Union.’”
Proclamation 92—Warning to Rebel Sympathizers
“[On] July 17, 1862,…I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby proclaim to and warn all persons within the contemplation of said sixth section to cease participating in, aiding, countenancing, or abetting the existing rebellion or any rebellion against the Government of the United States and to return to their proper allegiance to the United States on pain of the forfeitures and seizures as within and by said sixth section provided.”
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Abraham Lincoln was a Great American President.
Now President Donald J. Trump MUST implement his rendition of “The Lincoln Era”; close the border; rescind rebel sanctuary cities; compassionately repatriate all illegal and unassimilable aliens from Jan. 1, 1863; issue mass temporary work permits with no path to citizenship; revoke birthright citizenship; make English the sole official language; commence a war to defeat the rebellion; impose martial law; suspend habeas corpus; “smash” rebel printing presses, networks, podcasts, and social media platforms; and imprison political opponents and rebel judges, all in order to save not the Union but the Nation, eradicate communism and the communist American welfare state, and place America squarely back on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, including absolute freedom, free enterprise, free industries, free markets, private property, and minimal taxation and regulation, alongside infinitesimal constitutional government.
Rabb and those like him are tinpot revolutionaries. Armed with their outworn ‘memes’ and ‘narratives,’ they are skilled at theatrics, but politically incompetent. Often the children of privilege, they seek attention, and through it, power. But other than the endless posturing over ‘stolen land’ and ‘settler colonialism,’ and ‘genocide,’ and various other left-wing cliches that they employ to deceive and stir up the economically and historically illiterate, what, precisely, do they offer? Virtually nothing that could possibly work. They specialize in the politics of condemnation; they cannot build. One can only hope that the recent uptick in socialist inanity is the high-water mark of the left’s fabled ‘march through the institutions’ and that the tide will soon recede.
From your mouth to God’s ears.
So now that we know that the Trump boys are tied to 10 defense firms that have received billions in federal funds, and that Trump himself made $2 billion through crypto and investments he only made AS president, and yet nobody here (Turley especially) is talking about it – I guess all that excitement about Hunter Biden trying to profit off his ties to daddy really wasn’t that big of a deal to you guys – right?
Don’t forget Kash Patel’s six figure windfall return on a crypto investment that he “inadvertently” forgot to disclose. This is the most criminal administration not just in US history -but likely world history.
please stop talking to yourself.
Spoiling for a fight, are they?
Mistress, they didn’t fight. They ran. Put it to rest.
Government officials demanding ownership of private companies – that’s socialism closer to Karl Marx than James Madison.
In action Trump is way more socialist than any previous president. Trump already purchased shares of private companies on behalf of the U.S. government.
purchased shares of private companies
The key word there is “purchased.” If someone purchases something, they give the other person money for it, namely, the price required by the seller.
That is the opposite of socialism – which takes from people without giving them any money in return. Think “nationalize” – a favorite activity of socialist governments. That really means “steal.”
He directed funds from the US Treasury to pay off companies for their campaign contributions. It’s called quid pro quo.
The shares were given to the country and benefit the people, not the president.
Just like the NEW 747-8 for America.
This is part of an unfortunate pattern, it seems. There is a story today about the PA House of Representatives (the lower house of the state-level legislature), in which a Republican wore a patriotic suit – colored red, white, and blue – on the House floor. The House is controlled by Dems, 102-101. It had previously encouraged thematic attire, such as pride colors. But the patriotic colors were a no-go for the Dem leadership. The Speaker booted him out when he refused to change into less-patriotic colors.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/see-it-pennsylvania-democrats-boot-gop-lawmaker-from-house-floor-over-patriotic-america-250-suit
Oh! Where are my pearls! What can I clutch?
So you’re fine with patriotism being excluded from the House chamber?
You mean like that of the anti-American ineligible son-of-a- foreign-citizen Muslo-Commie fraud Obongo and the corrupto-in-absentia Joke Buydumb?
I’m pretty sure you’re already clutching something.
OldManFromKS,
Saw that.
There are also some HOAs who are ordering people to take down their American flags or face fines. Prior to Trump getting re-elected not a peep. Now, they are reaching for their pearls to clutch all in the name of someone is flying the American flag.
Are you referring to the HOA that ordered members to cease and desist from damaging and/or removing the stucco siding from structures owned and maintained by the HOA in order to install brackets in violation of community rules?
Nope.
I am referring to people being ordered to take down flags from their own property/homes. Nothing the HOA owns.
Publish the HOA Rules.
OldManFromKS,
At first, I thought this was a Best of the Bee reading the headline.
Nope.
Fired trans Dem campaigner calls on followers to ‘kill your local Republican’ and vows ‘trans jihad’
https://nypost.com/2026/07/02/us-news/fired-trans-dem-campaigner-calls-on-followers-to-kill-your-local-republican-and-vows-trans-jihad/
Upstate – I often check the NYP, but I hadn’t yet today, so thanks for that.
Trans people seem to have a major violence issue. It probably stems from how unhappy they are. They then search for victims to kill, as with the many trans mass shooters these days. It is part of the assassination chic culture that has been built by the Left ever since Trump announced for office in 2015. They rail against guns, but advocate killing. Perhaps they’ve figured out that people who use guns for self-defense are harder to kill.
Trans people don’t rail against guns for themselves. Most of them are autistic, which means their brains are inflamed from very high levels of aluminum in their brains from the multitude of injections that our children are subjected to (they don’t excrete the aluminum in the injections like most children – not that anyone should be injected with aluminum, which is antithetical to living tissue).
It’s a fair guess to assume that most of them are on hormones AND Prozac or its many similar drugs, either of which can turn people into a homicidal/suicidal rage.
Hmmm. >500,000,000 privately owned firearms in the US. I wonder how many of those are in the hands of trans folks? I wonder if that person is a blood relative of Jim Jones? Because that sounds like a call to mass suicide to me.
What a strawman argument. The complaint is that we didn’t and still don’t live up to the principles of our founding documents. Partisanship makes one dumb.
. . . and still don’t . . .
If you’re so unhappy with America, you’re free to leave. Funny, the rest of the world wants in. But spoiled leftist dweebs can only carp and complain while, of course, staying here to reap the benefits of the greatest nation on earth.
Well, come on in. Don’t need a thing.
Bingo – Turley admits as much himself – that the Founders fell woefully short in their promise that “All men were created equally” and that the original American values were largely aspirational and NOT realized at the moment of the signing of the Declaration. But you know – those books on ‘rage’ aren’t going to sell unless there is rage out there – so he fans the flames with his disingenuous screed….
“disingenuous”
Can you come up with a new word in your spelling and vocabulary homework?
Leftists aren’t educated enough to come up with any word other than “disingenuous” and “enlightened.” If you read a leftist screed, it consists exclusively of those two words, although now they’ve added “stolen land” as a third term just to mix it up a bit.
This brilliant constitutional scholar obviously attended union-dominated public schools. The Declaration of Independence was not a “promise”; “all men are created equal,” understanding that the outcomes of their lives may vary, and the original American values were “realized” in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, 1789, which the judicial branch—the second legislative branch—has endeavored mightily to nullify and deny since 1860.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
– Declaration of Independence, 1776
Here Turley touches on several topics worth debating. But if all the debaters are Estovir, using different names, the discussion has no hope.
^ The moron who thinks everyone else is named Estovir ^
Estovir, we recognize you’re many aliases. It is ‘you’ all too often. Which gives each thread a certain sameness.
Moron, you can’t even spell “your.”
Stupid. That person post with their name… Unlike Ano
Isn’t it time that we stopped accepting their marketing “Democrat” Socialist, now it’s DSA. They make every attempt to hide their identity Marxist Communist. Rat Poison sounds bad but Safe Rat Poison well that is more acceptable. Call them what they are and start dealing with them now, before things get ugly.
The United States spent the better part of the 20th century battling Communism around the planet, including here in the US, to prevent Communism polluting civilization. Now that it is here, do not think for one single second that Americans – something a Socialist, Marxist, or Communist cannot be – will not take up arms to destroy it here. Buckle up.
Well, I’ll give it a name.
It’s called “semantic change.”
It encompasses the gradual, sly, insidious, propagandistic manipulation of words and definitions as they are formally understood to mean.
I would argue that there are two main operating forces that effect these “changes.” First is an increasing diversity of human input and control–(including the effect of intentionally pathologic and destructive input), -and,- which then increasingly and significantly affects the Second force: algorithmic AI output, which will increasingly feed the masses. AS often used today, its destructive application includes manipulation of political thought and ideology.
I used the word “increasing” intentionally.
And no- I did not consult AI for what I just wrote. It is from my own logical, rational, thinking. I hope none of us ever lose that ability. And I welcome criticism. (In your own words, please.)
Marxists know that controlling language is indispensable to bringing about the Revolution. That’s why, to take one example, “gender affirming care” is used as a cover for sexually mutilating children.
What an excellent example, NotSoOld.
Kinder, gentler, euphemistic (and therefore more palatable) go-arounds.
By admittedly VERY benign analogy on my part, I cringe at the monkey-see monkey-do change in even the every day pronunciation of words in this country, e.g., from what was long referred to as “FOR’midable” to now be called “for ‘MID’able;” —or prior HOS’pitable to now hosPIT’able, etc. Once limited to English press, which sounded more classy, so American journalists then adopted it. Now politicians are doing the same, as well as many academics/academicians.
It just goes to show the power of sheep and sheepherder in any populace where herd mentality controls. Trump, for all his faults, nonetheless strayed too far…
Lin, you’ve probably noticed another example of propagandistic word changes: the lamestream media has shifted from “conservative” to “far right.” Anyone more conservative than Fidel Castro is now labeled “far right.” We see through that. They only discredit themselves. With the rise of new media, their monopoly is gone.
Another great example. We apparently have not yet experienced media’s defining demarcation separating ‘left’ from ‘far’left;” Indeed, we hardly hear/read/see either in the media, because it’s lumped together with the more favorable and amenable reference to “progressive.”
True. Other than “progressive,” “left-leaning” is another go to for leftist. Even “progressive” is word play. Who could be against progress. By progress, they mean socialism. Conservatives also believe in progress but not socialism.
I don’t think I have ever seen media refer to “right-leaning.” It’s always jugular go full Monty to the far end of the spectrum.
Exactly. Socialist or leftist candidates or publications are always “left-leaning.” Conservative ones are always “far-right.”
Lin,
Well said.
Call them out for what they are: Communists, pretending to be socialists, and faking being Democrats.
See here: Reeling Democratic establishment accuses socialists of exploiting ballot access
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/reeling-democratic-establishment-suggests-policing-primaries-pushing-back?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home
AI can be useful. But depending on how AI is prompted, garbage in, garbage out.
Had a friend get dupped by a really bad AI fake video.
Also, the Swiss Business School found people who used AI on a regular basis, has lower critical thinking skills.
Another good example, Upstate.
And whether “Olly” is a person or an AI bot, I nonetheless credit [his] calling our attention to the importance of “input” as its programmatic control of “output.” I’m old enuf to remember the old days when you simply said (and relied on), “what you see is what you get,” ha ha
lin, apparently I missed where someone suggested that I was an AI bot.
So it would be fair to say professor Turley engages in these kinds of semantics games and the algorithm adjusts it to cater to MAGA.
It is very hard for me to employ, even find, an alternate definition for pathologic “negativity” that would not invoke remembrance of you.
Would you like to be specific, so that we underlings might understand your point?
Here’s what you really need to understand. The United States spent the better part of the 20th century battling Communism around the planet, including here in the US, to prevent Communism polluting civilization. Now that it is here, do not think for one single second that Americans – something a Socialist, Marxist, or Communist cannot be – will not take up arms to destroy it here. Buckle up.
Children use the internet the most. AI is being programmed by children. Haven’t you noticed the juvenile quality to all of it? The profound ignorance of it?
The birthright opinion is juvenile and ignorant. This Save Act thing? In California undocumented people have regular drivers licenses. It proves nothing. There’s the real ID. As if those prove anything.
Just do a good job at whatever you do.
“It encompasses the gradual, sly, insidious, propagandistic manipulation of words and definitions as they are formally understood to mean.”
That is why I keep a full length, paper copy of Websters 2nd International dictionary by the desk in my office.
You’re correct.
My only hope: that the revolution for which these radicals hope turns on them and just as in the French Revolution, the radicals themselves experience the guillotine—figuratively of course!.
Not figuratively.
So Thaddeus Stevens revisited?
“kill the beast before it kills you”
Whoa, talk about a double standard. Turley’s criticism of Rep. Chris Rabb is an exercise in intellectual hypocrisy. In his own book, Rage and the Republic, Turley openly writes about the ‘inherent hypocrisy’ of the Declaration of Independence and how the Founders deliberately ignored the implications of natural law for enslaved people. Yet, the exact second a Black lawmaker points out that same historical truth, Turley labels it a ‘socialist denunciation of our core institutions.’
Turley’s entire defense relies on a revisionist, idealized version of history. The founding documents did not naturally deliver a ‘more perfect union’—it required a bloody Civil War and radical constitutional amendments to force the country to end the systemic oppression the original Constitution protected. Furthermore, trying to scare readers by equating standard, constitutionally permitted proposals for Supreme Court reform with a ‘French Revolution mobocracy’ is pure partisan fear-mongering. Turley is perfectly happy with a conservative judiciary that invents unwritten exemptions to protect the Federal Reserve, but views democratic checks and balances as a threat to civilization. You cannot claim to defend ‘the truth’ while actively gaslighting people about American history.
(I think poor George sat on a porcupine quill, whose leaked ink stained his pants and caused insufferable opposition coming from his quarters [no pun intended]. I wish for him a day of rest.)
“Turley’s criticism of Rep. Chris Rabb is an exercise in intellectual hypocrisy.”
Let’s see:
One scholar argues that there was an inconsistent *application* of the DoI. On the other side, a Marxist power luster thoroughly rejects the DoI, the Constitution, and every value America stands for (e.g., individualism).
No doubt there is a delusional universe in which those are the same type of criticism.
Sam, Rep. Chris Rabb did not “thoroughly reject” the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. He pointed out an unassailable historical reality: that the nation was built on stolen land and stolen labor, and that the original documents purposely erased Black and Indigenous peoples to maintain the privilege of a select few. That is a documented, historical fact of 1776 and 1787—not a rejection of American values.
You claim Turley is just pointing out an “inconsistent application.” But Turley literally wrote in his own book that the Declaration had an “inherent hypocrisy” and that the Founders deliberately chose to “ignore its implications for enslaved people.” When Turley uses academic language to say the documents protected slavery, you call it “scholarship.” When a Black lawmaker uses direct language to say the exact same thing, you call it “Marxism.” That is the literal definition of intellectual hypocrisy.
Can george show us a deed from the Indians, to prove his stolen land BS.
And who did they steal or kill to get the land.
“Rep. Chris Rabb did not “thoroughly reject” . . .”
He claims, as Leftists do today, that the American *system* is by its nature fascism. Mamdani wishes to replace American individualism with the “warmth of collectivism.” That is a wholesale rejection of every American value.
Learn some reading comprehension. And intellectual honesty.
Here’s what you really need to understand. The United States spent the better part of the 20th century battling Communism around the planet, including here in the US, to prevent Communism polluting civilization. Now that it is here, do not think for one single second that Americans – something a Socialist, Marxist, or Communist cannot be – will not take up arms to destroy it here. Buckle up.
George says, “Turley’s entire defense relies on a revisionist, idealized version of history.”
“defense?”
Seems to me that the DoI, Constitution, and Amendments ALL relied “on a revisionist, idealized version” of what could be to replace what had been.
Maybe if the cowardly Repubicans develop a spine and by some miracle win the House in November, then they should refuse to seat that person!
That would be…fascist.
So what? MAGAs, including Trump and SCOTUS, use the Constitution as toilet paper.
Wrong again.
Opinions on SCOTUS ruling depend entirely on whose ox is being gored. There are multiple rulings i dont agree with but im not a lawyer let alone a judge or SCTUS justice. To condemn the court or the system that created it because one doesn’t agree with a group of rulings is at best absurd at worst idiotic.
Yep, use it to while the sh!tsta!ns of the left and flush ’em, as it was intended to be used.
GFY
Proof sally.
The court told the Prez he must accept illegals babies. Did he go against them… NO!
That is a remarkably stupid statement, but, go on – share an actual example.
Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.