Years ago, I called Antifa the Keyser Söze of the left, after the character in “The Usual Suspects.” In the film, the character Virgil explains how Söze stayed in the shadows: he became “a myth, a spook story that criminals tell their kids at night.” The strategy was too simple: “the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist.”
Democratic leaders have long fostered the myth around Antifa, the largest and most violent group on the political left. For years, they have denied the existence of the group even as members were charged with crimes (including terrorism). Now, the French authorities have found that the nonexistent group is the largest of three “ideologically distinct groups” responsible for the violence in France. It appears that either the entire French security system is delusional or the trick is up for the American left.
I have testified before Congress about Antifa, run columns on the organization for over a decade, and written a book discussing Antifa. Yet, Democratic members continued to insist that there is no such group, while other leading Democrats have praised Antifa for instilling fear in MAGA.
It was a curious claim even then, when other Democratic leaders were actively pandering to the violent group.
Former Democratic National Committee deputy chair Keith Ellison — now the Minnesota attorney general — proclaimed that Antifa would “strike fear in the heart” of Trump. His own son, Minneapolis City Council member Jeremiah Ellison, declared his allegiance to Antifa in the heat of the protests this summer.
However, Democratic leaders and pundits have repeated the mantra that there is no such group despite political violence on the left spreading across the country.
Rep. Dan Goldman (D., N.Y.) dared anyone to name a single member of Antifa despite the charging of Antifa members with various serious crimes.
Former House Judiciary Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) was widely ridiculed for denying the existence of Antifa.
Others on the left have joined Goldman in this absurd claim. Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel devoted part of his monologue to assuring viewers that Antifa is no more than a mythical “chupacabra.” “You understand there is no Antifa,” he said. “This is an entirely made-up organization.”
The denials continued even as FBI Director Christopher Wray debunked deniers like Goldman. “Antifa is a real thing.” European countries have banned Antifa Internet sites due to their criminal conduct while Antifa candidates have been elected to office as members of the group.
Now, French authorities identified Antifa as the largest of three “ideologically distinct groups” responsible for the violence in France. The French Justice Minister also banned far-left politicians for fueling the rage. A previously banned Antifa group has been linked to one murder in France. Antifa and communist flags have been prominent in the protests.
A Belgian minister also blamed Antifa for the spread of the violence.
It appears that Keyser Söze is in the open, but Democrats maintain the FBI, Justice Department, and various countries are simply delusional.
The problem is when the myth becomes reality. Left-wing pundits and politicians are caught in this denial web where they have to maintain the absurd idea that Antifa is just an idea.
Some of us have been writing about Antifa for years after watching them intimidate and threaten faculty and students on campuses. One such student came from my campus and proclaimed that Antifa was winning after his arrest for property destruction.
When another radical was arrested after taking an axe to a congressional office, he self-identified as a member of Antifa.
Before Kyle Benjamin Douglas Calvert, 26, implanted an IED device outside of Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office in downtown Montgomery, he put up stickers reading “support your local Antifa.”
Numerous Antifa members have been arrested, including some who claimed to be journalists.
Many protesters belong to Antifa groups that have names like “Rose City Antifa” and offshoots like Love and Rage and Mexico’s Amor Y Rabia. Antifa members have been elected to the French and European parliaments.
Rutgers Professor Mark Bray’s “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” called by some the “Antifa bible,” explains that the group is united in its opposition to free speech. “Most Americans in Antifa have been anarchists or antiauthoritarian communists,” he writes. “From that standpoint, ‘free speech’ as such is merely a bourgeois fantasy unworthy of consideration.”
Yet, Democratic leaders seemed to be adopting the 1967 ‘Guide for the Married Man’ when caught with Antifa allies or associations:
Ask Andy Ngo if ANTIFA is real.
Antifa is merely an “ideology.”
It can be instructive to temporarily accept an enemy’s premise.
That (counterfeit) premise would have us believe that an idea (not individuals acting) is looting French and Italian stores, torching cultural buildings, assaulting innocent citizens, attempting to topple Western civilization.
First the absurdities. Then the atrocities.
Sam,
Right?
An “ideology” burned down a historic town hall in the French city of Limoges. That hall served as a hub for the French resistance against the Nazi occupation during WWII.
Saw a video of that same “ideology” looting a woman’s business. She tried to stop them by arguing she voted for their “ideology.” One of the “ideology” pushed her aside while other “ideologies” looted her business. With tears in her eyes, she stared in disbelief that an “ideology” could do such a thing to her.
Trump supporters rioted at and invaded the historically significant Capitol building on January 6.
The Capitol must be closed to the public to maintain the sanctity of Congress.
Trump got his “nice piece” prize when he banged a teenage girl.
If Turley is a libertarian, then what about freedom of association?
What about it? The point of the post is to demonstrate Democrats are, as always, blatant liars.
You are free to associate with America hating Antifa trash all you want. But because they are known to engage in criminal conduct, perhaps even terrorism and sedition, you may get yourself Omared if you choose to associate with them.
Your choice, of course.
No one stopped you from associating with goats, nor have they stopped you from marrying on.
Would Turley like French law to be applied in America?
How much do eggs cost in China?
It seems that ANTIFA will get another free pass because of “political lawyerly speech”. Because no one has the temerity to define this loosely affiliate horde of savage anarchists as a factual organization, but safely keeps them as a loose amalgam of similarly-minded groups, we deny any law enforcement entity the authority by law to deal with them in concrete terms to throttle their global attacks on civilization.
If you allow cockroaches to roam freely in your home to breed and destroy, all the while providing safe havens and nourishment for them to do this, you will certainly become overrun with an infestation that even the best Orkin Man cannot deal with.
As I was told, once, by such an Orkin man, that once the cockroaches infest the interior spaces between condos, the entire building is infested and likely cannot be cleaned of such an infestation. This was a 17 story condo complex on Jay street in Brooklyn, not some ghetto in the Bronx. Our solution to that misery was to leave NYC for the North Country.
I think we are in a similar situation in the western world. Our suicidally empathetic progs have (perhaps willingly) left our doors and windows open for decades and we are now at a point where “tenting” the entire nation is the last resort. Does anyone think that there are people willing to do this? I know of many, but that will require vigilante justice because of the mental/moral inertia of our leaders.
ANTIFA will get another free pass … it is an ideology. You get that?
Take your meds ANON. Majority of the posts are yours. Out of the last 5 posts 4 were yours. Get a job.
Posting is his job. A person with mental illness will engage in flagrantly outrageous behavior up to a certain point, when the reward no longer exists. OTOH, engaging in said behavior in return for wages, that’s the ticket
Why are you guys discouraging free speech on a free speech blog that you don’t even own?
People do not need to see you vomiting
Curious, how many “suicidally empathetic progs…” have actually committed suicide?
Not enough. Are you volunteering?
Related to the existence of Antifa:
”U.S. institutions of Politics/Law, Education, Economics, Religion, Family, Sports, Health Care, and Multi-Media continue to be under increasing overt siege.Active attempts to corrupt and destroy ALL of these Institutions are occurring in the USA and the Western World with the additional goals of creating ongoing bedlam, along with emotional fears and stressors within its citizenry. …”
Please click on the below link for further information. Thank you.
”The Winds of War Continue at Hurricane Force – Seems an Undeclared and Unrecognized WW III is Occurring, but Under an Atypical Scenario?”
https://donbradyphdpsydncsp.substack.com/p/the-winds-of-war-continue-at-hurricane
My Aunt Latifa is one of the nicest ladies you could ever want to meet.
“ANTIFA was never a ‘group’ or ‘organization’.”
So Antifa is a motley collection of terrorists. Does that somehow help its sympathizers evade reality?
You post political comments here nonstop under anonimity 24/7/365, is that evading reality?
Sam,
For some reason they think antifa has to have a leader or headquarters to make them a real organization. They are just a loose collection of terrorists with the same goals or ideology: Use force to terrorize anyone who dares to think for themselves.
Here, this interviewer was attacked for simply reporting both sides of an issue,
Social media interviewer choked, punched and stabbed by California ‘No Kings’ protesters
https://nypost.com/2026/10/21/us-news/content-creator-dante-choked-stabbed-at-california-no-kings-protest/
NY Post? Are you kidding? That’s nothing more than a comicbook for the mentally challenged.
I suspect Hunter Biden disagrees with your slander.
Professor Turley,
Why are you still a democrat? Why do you still call yourself a democrat?
Please provide an answer to that!
Thank you.
He’s a democrat in name only. His views lean heavily on the Libertarian side. But…still calls himself a Democrat.
I’m registered as a Republican, but…clearly I’m more progressive than a “regular” Republican.
Name only, really? So are you his wife, psychologist or alter ego?
STFU then get a Job. Too many stupid posts from this ANON!
I am familiar with your type of “registered Republican”. Here, in a deep red state and district, I have several friends, committed “progressives” (i.e., closet Marxists) who are registered Republicans so they can vote in our closed Republican primaries and try to nominate the worst of the candidates. So far, it hasn’t worked.
If they’re “closet Marxists”, then how would you know that they are? And you also know their voting strategy?
delicioushappily,
The good professor is a JFK, traditional, moderate, liberal Democrat. He and many like him want their party to walk back from the far leftist wokeism illiberals that have taken over their party.
Other traditional liberal Democrats like Bill Maher have been saying the same thing for years. You know it is bad when Bill Maher says his vote is in play and he would vote for a Republican if the Democrat party continues down the stupid and crazy they have embraced as of late.
Antifa is just as organized, albeit decentrally, as the Mafia is. There is a money trail, organization that provides rest facilities where they riot as well as a communication network. There are conservative journalists who have listed names and identities of those who coordinate their activities, as well as many who have been arrested, like a Texas cell leader Benjamin Hanil Song and his cell members. Some of their leaders head other prominent left wing Non-profit organizations and NGOs and Antifa are their brownshirt thugs for hire by such organizations. It’s ironic how so many Democrats seek so hard to keep Antifa identities secret and have no problem with them wearing masks doing their vandalism, thugery, etc. while at the same time losing their minds about ICE wearing masks to protect their identities.
If what you say is true, then can’t the FBI nail them. You an insider?
Under Trump, the FBI has been making some progress towards investigation and arrests. They got some of those Zizians, for instance.
Under Biden, well…..
What’s coming next is Macron’s accusation that Americans are behind the trouble in his country. Trump is on record saying that he advised Macron years ago that he needed to shut his borders or something like this would happen. When you let too many people in at once, assimilation is impossible. The result is the mobs try to bring their customs, tradition, and governments with them to impose upon wherever they land. They have no desire to adopt the history of their new country. The traditions and culture are alien to them. The result? You can catch it on the news at 6.
“What’s coming next is Macron’s accusation that Americans are behind the trouble in his country.”
He’s already blamed Trump, some 48 hours ago. You’re late.
JJC,
Great observation.
Macron and many other EU leaders are all mad Trump has pointed out to them the dangers of their policies and he was right.
Huh? You’re just repeating news headline verbatim?
And how do you know they’re “mad”? Macron call you first?
That comment by Trump just shows how utterly, utterly stupid and ignorant he is. French ethnic minorities – and periodic tensions between them and the police – date back decades to the end of French colonialism, particularly in North Africa. Macron is a very poor leader, almost as incompetent as Trump in some regards, but he can hardly be blamed for the numbers of often-now fourth generation migrants in France. One might just as well go after Marco Rubio for being descended from Hispanic migrants who should be deported back to Cuba.
The first rule of Fight Club: Don’t talk about it. Don’t acknowledge its existence. When pressed, deny, deny, deny.
Why?
Silence protects criminal gangs from law enforcement.
Silence ensures control over gang members, restricts dissent and outside influences, maintains blind obedience.
Why do supporters of the Fight Club not talk about it? Because it’s their criminal gang.
Who gives a damn whether Antifa has a headquarters, a president, or a membership roster? Why is that even the test? A movement can have a shared ideology, identifiable participants, recurring tactics, and a pattern of behavior without somebody at the top issuing orders.
The French intelligence services apparently have no trouble recognizing and identifying these people. Yet we have those that keep returning to the absence of a central organization as though that somehow settles the question.
Nobody needs an organizational chart to recognize a movement. And nobody needs one to investigate, arrest, and prosecute people who commit crimes. Beliefs are protected. Criminal conduct isn’t. That’s the distinction that matters.
What concern is it of yours what happens in France?
What concern is it of yours what concerns me?
You’re the one with the bigmouth babbling about it and its obvious you’re just talking out of your butt. Again.
The question remains: what concern is that of yours?
The question remains: what concern is that of yours?
Olly, anon never stated it was his concern, he simply asked you why you make an issue of it. Take a break today, go feed the ducks or something.
“. . . he simply asked you . . .”
BS.
He used his typical tactic of hiding his hostility behind a passive-aggressive question.
Here’s Sam using his typical tactic of hiding his hostility behind a passive-aggressive analysis.
Loading…
Sam,
Well said.
Lame responses are all annony has.
Obvious that this ANON is full of sh*t. ALWAYS!!
STFU
What a stupid comment.
“. . . the absence of a central organization . . .”
Exactly. That is obviously a red herring.
There are countless criminal gangs in the U.S. There is no “central organization” for those gangs. And yet they exist, and have exactly the same goals and tactics: mayhem, theft, violence against the innocent.
Sam, nope. Criminal gangs always have a leader. They have a top-down structure. ANTIFA does not. Because it is not a ‘gang’ or ‘organization’.
The ideology exists. But it’s not a group.
The anti-anti-fascists like want to make them into a group because it’s easier to demonize and attack.
Fun fact. The FBI has not prosecuted the ‘leader’ of ANTIFA or identified its…headquarters. Because they don’t exist.
Sam, exactly. X keeps insisting that without a headquarters, a membership roster, or an identifiable leader, there’s no organization to prosecute. Who said we needed one?
Look at organized crime. The government didn’t have to dismantle the entire Mafia to put Al Capone in prison. They got him on tax evasion. They went after the crimes. If the evidence establishes a criminal enterprise and supports a RICO case, fine. If not, the crimes are still crimes.
Nobody is suggesting we prosecute an ideology. We prosecute people for what they do, not what they believe.X keeps arguing about organizational structure as though the absence of a national leader somehow makes the movement, its participants, or their criminal conduct disappear. It doesn’t.
He’s arguing against a requirement nobody imposed while avoiding the point you actually made.
Who said we needed one? What does the Mafia or Capone, who wasn’t mafia BTW, just a Chicago gangster, have to do with Antifa with its terror troops?
Olly,
You are exactly right: crimes are crimes, and individuals who commit violence or property damage should absolutely be prosecuted for their actions. Nobody is arguing that individual criminal conduct somehow disappears just because there isn’t a national leader.
However, your Al Capone and Mafia analogy actually proves why the distinction between a “movement” and an “organization” matters so much legally. The government didn’t have to dismantle the entire Mafia to get Capone, but they did have to prove Capone was operating within a highly structured, identifiable criminal enterprise with a clear hierarchy, cash flows, and command structure.
That is exactly how the RICO Act works. To bring a RICO case, the law requires prosecutors to establish the existence of a distinct “enterprise” that has a shared, common purpose, structural continuity, and a pattern of racketeering. While autonomous local cells can certainly be prosecuted locally for specific crimes, you cannot legally apply a sweeping organizational framework like RICO to a decentralized, abstract political movement or an ideology.
So no, nobody is saying people shouldn’t be prosecuted for what they do. But if you want to use the legal tools designed for organized crime, you actually do have to meet the legal requirements of proving an organized structure. Pointing that out isn’t avoiding the point—it’s just understanding how the law works.
But Republicans WANT to prosecute the ideology and the only way to do that is to make it into a “group” or “organization.”
The problem is proving legally it is an organization or group and they can’t do that. The Trump administration wants to categorize it as a terrorist organization, clearly they won’t be able to prove that in court. Because it doesn’t exist as such.
OLLY,
Well said.
There are a number of terrorist groups who operate independently of each other in case one is compromised, they cannot give up the other groups. They do not need to be coordinated to carry out their same goals or ideology: To conduct terrorist attacks to achieve that ideology.
Antifa is doing the same. We can see by the North Texas antifa cell convictions they did not have connections to other antifa terrorist cells. Technically, the cell looked to Benjamin Song as their leader who obtained firearms, recruited members at gun ranges.
OLLY,
Well, here is an example of a small but organized antifa terrorist cell,
Antifa Cell Members Convicted in Prairieland ICE Detention Center Shooting
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/antifa-cell-members-convicted-prairieland-ice-detention-center-shooting
Reading that, and the jury found the terrorist cell seemed pretty organized by the evidence presented.
The “cell” was just a group of people acting independently. The DOJ is only categorizing them as a “cell” because they want to charge them as a “terrorist” group which they are not. It’s a typical smattering of violent protesters. Like the Jan 6, MAGA rioters.
It doesn’t mean they are members of ANTIFA. The DOJ just labeled them as such for political reasons. It’s Trump’s DOJ.
Criminal gangs, organized crime, and self-styled revolutionaries have structure like eukaryotic organisms. They’re parasites on humanity like fleas, mosquitos, and ticks. But Antifa is more like an infection of single-celled amoebae turning healthy flesh into pus.
You are correct, Olly. GSX is a Moron. Terrorists usually don’t have a sign over an establishment saying, ” Terrorists for rent; will burn, shoot, and kill at your desire.”
The point is ANTIFA is an ideology. It’s not a group, or organization. It never was.
What is funny is everyone here is ANTIFA, even president Trump. Because we are all anti-fascists, right?
You it’s not even really a “movement”. It’s just an ideology that is vehemently against Fascists.
Professor Turley conflates European ANTIFA with our ANTIFA. They are not the same. Of course our less observant readers here cannot and would not be able to know the distinction because there ARE distinctions.
In France, “Antifa” is used as a broad umbrella term for autonomous, militant anti-fascist networks (such as Jeune Garde). French intelligence monitors these factions as ideological milieus rather than a single unified corporation. Furthermore, European anti-fascist traditions have deep, distinct regional roots that operate entirely differently from the American context. Turley doesn’t know any better, but that doesn’t stop him from conflating any ANTIFA’s as one and the same anywhere and that is simply not true.
Even an ideology as large as antifa can form group or certainly become an organization. If the evil members are there and willing they can form groups and even an organization. If individuals are so quick to call the proud boys an organization with several different outlying groups located in different areas then antifa can, and has done the same.
If it were to form as a “group” the said “group” would have a name and members belonging to it.
ANTIFA is literally an acronym for Anti-Fascist. If you’re against fascists you’re a “member” of ANTIFA.
https://www.antifaworldhq.com/
Your childish definition is wrong George. BTW, I’m against fascists but not a member.
“Antifa is a political movement in Germany composed of multiple militant groups and individuals on the political left, who describe themselves as anti-fascist; its primary activity has been combating fascism: initially Nazism, and later neo-Nazism. The antifa movement in Germany has existed in different eras and incarnations, dating back to Antifaschistische Aktion, from which the moniker antifa came…”
But I digress…
You’re against Fascists which makes you an anti-fascist. Aka, ANTIFA. LOL! Welcome to the fold.
How’s that? Being against fascism, generally, does not make one an “anti-fascist” since it doesn’t exist.
“Being against fascism, generally, does not make one an “anti-fascist”…”
Yes. It makes you an..anti-fascist. Being against something is “anti”. Just like being against abortion makes you ‘anti-abortion” it’s the opposite of “pro”, as in for.
You’re ANTIFA. LOL!!
It’s not a group, or organization. It never was. Okay, now prove it. Saying so X is not proof considering your proclivity for lying.
How do you prove something that doesn’t exist?
Nobody has been able to show ANTIFA has a headquarters or leadership. Not even the FBI. It’s pretty self explanatory.
You’re not gonna get any answers. What is still true is what I said. It’s not a group or organization.
How do you prove something that doesn’t exist?
Well, that’s where yo come in George. You’re so good at making up non-existent facts, we just thought you had some insight.
You also have google at your disposal. Prove it yourself.
So your source for lies is google? Now we’re getting somewhere… so you admit that you lie.
What lies? That’s not an admission. Google is a source for everything. Prove it is a lie.
Olly, how do you prosecute an ideology? Because that is all ANTIFA is. Anyone who is against fascists or fascism is a ‘member’ of ANTIFA. Many conservatives are anti-fascists, so am I and so are you.
Heck, the vast majority of Americans are ANTIFA members, because they are…anti-fascists, no?
An ideology blows things up? Riots? Contacts each other? Has brochures? Makes sure “members” show up somewhere? ANTIFA is a phony name they use. They are the fascists.
X, you’ve contradicted yourself several times through out the comment section. Depending who you respond to, you have a different definition. For the sake of clarity, just make-up one definitive lie and stick to it.
What’s the contradiction? You don’t point it out. Prove the contradiction.
Olly,
Perfect!
OLLY,
Correct.
As we have seen here in America, and now what we are witnessing in France and other parts of the EU, they are a terrorist group and should be dealt with accordingly.
Accordingly? So because someone, somewhere is venting hate and frustration, its a Antifa directed action? And you know that how?
Not one EU country has designated “Antifa” a terror group. How can they, it doesn’t exist.
What have we seen here in America?
That what Scalia was saying in Employment Department v Smith. The Supreme Court seems to be chipping away at that principle.
And Abigail Spanberger is a moderate democrat. If even Christopher Wray could recognize Antifa then that means there was a 3 ring circus of Antifa acrobats performing outside the FBI building and one of them, back uniform, mask, and all fell on him. It was that obvious.
These people act just like the old Baader Meinhof Gang (Red Army Faction) except Antifa is better organized but has not yet to resorted to kidnapping and knocking over banks. Murders or assassinations not yet apparent.
There is no ideological connection between Baader-Meinhof. You can’t spell it correctly either. So we’re assuming you’re fluent in French and German languages as well as their respective political histories. But if you’re so sure then lay out the facts here.
The funny thing is ANTIFA was never a “group” or “organization”. It’s an ideology. That’s why nobody in the Trump administration can identify who leads it or where is it headquartered.
Sounds familir – Islam.
So is Christianity. It’s not one monolithic belief, aka Ideology either. That’s why we have hundreds if not thousands of different Christian sects. But I digress.
“hundreds if not thousands of different Christian sects. But I digress.” Now digress further George, now produce facts.
Loading
And nobody in the Biden Admin could ID its leaders or HQ. Or Obama, or Busch, or etc..
It is always fascinating to watch commentators spin a complex sociological reality into a Hollywood thriller, but your ongoing obsession with framing Antifa as some sort of corporate entity—complete with a shadowy, top-down Keyser Söze leadership—reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how modern political movements actually function.
You lean heavily on FBI Director Christopher Wray’s quote that “Antifa is a real thing” to validate your decade-long narrative. Yet, you conveniently omit the very next sentence of his testimony, where he explicitly stated that Antifa is an ideology and a movement, not a centralized group or organization. Leaving out the core of law enforcement’s assessment is a curious choice for a legal scholar, though entirely necessary if you want your argument to hold any water. When people point out that Antifa is “an idea,” they aren’t denying that individuals commit acts of property destruction; they are correcting the cartoonish right-wing fantasy that there is a central headquarters mailing out membership cards and marching orders.
Your attempt to use French intelligence reports as a “gotcha” for the American left is equally clumsy. European anti-fascist networks have entirely separate historical contexts, and French authorities classify them as a decentralized ideological milieu, not a unified corporation. Furthermore, claiming that “Antifa members” have been elected to European parliaments is a deliberate stretch; these individuals are members of legally recognized, mainstream far-left political parties who happen to share anti-fascist views. No one is running on a “Keyser Söze” ticket.
If you want to be taken seriously as an expert who testifies before Congress, you might want to stop relying on 1967 comedy tropes and start engaging with the actual structural reality of decentralized movements. The only “trick” being pulled here is trying to convince readers that a fractured web of autonomous local actors is a disciplined, monolith army.
Come on Professor, tryin to tie the French rioting to the ANTIFA movement in the U.S. is laughable.
The French are famous for protesting violently on things they legitimately see as a failure of government. They were protesting high cost of living and high gas prices. At least the French are expressing their disapproval in a very…French way.
It is always fascinating to watch George X lie about complex sociological reality …
What’s the lie? You never seem to be able to point it out.
You wrote George, not anon.
Here’s the lie, X. One of your daily mishaps.
Says X to Professor Turley: “You lean heavily on FBI Director Christopher Wray’s quote that “Antifa is a real thing” to validate your decade-long narrative.”
Oh, but I reread Turley’s post and out of no less than 19 paragraphs, he mentions Christopher Wray ONCE, in one sentence. That’s “leaning heavily????????????????????????” That qualifies as one of your little lies. Lies, in combination with your penchant for adopting words and phrases and structures from other commenters ( “no?” is a good example) all point to an amoebic blob still trying to take form as an effective anti-Turley commenter.
Oh but what a joke little x is, pretending to be a big bad X. Why does he hate Turley so much that he is here everyday to insult him. Does X follow a leader? Or is he a lone old miscreant? Or did Turley fail him in a class? He wants us to know, on multiple occasions, that he is a registered Republican. Why does he want us to know that? Apparently, his only real friend is Google, LOL!
Anitfa may not have a central command but it does have centralized sources of funding.
So…what is this “centralized source” of funding?
You got facts to support that comment?
This is absurd even for Truley. Is he saying that Antifa is some shadow international organization that also magically has no leadership and no actual groups?
You should disprove him then?
Antifa is the largest Fascist organization in the world today. Denying its existence or minimizing their impact only adds the fertilizer that helps it grow, like minimizing the impact of the Nazis in 1930s Germany.
Almost. MAGA is a larger fascist group.
Most definitely. And look around here to see it laughable adherents. Old guys yapping away as if they are all knowing. Cripes, these old guys can’t spell correctly let alone pee without help.
Largest? So who are it members and where is their HQ?
Antifa are the fascists. Until you understand that you don’t understand anything about what is happening.
It’s literally in its name. So, by your stupid comment, are you an Antifa expert? Didn’t think so.