Invasion! Montgomery County Police Cross State Line and Conduct Raid in Washington D.C.

180px-MD_-_Montgomery_County_PoliceThe Montgomery County police conducted a raid on a home roughly a quarter of a mile in the territory of Washington, D.C. It appears that the Montgomery County police rented themselves and their vehicles to a television production company for a show called “Prison Wives” and proceeded to conduct the raid without notifying the District of Columbia.

D.C. residents were terrified when officers with guns drawn and police cars blaring raided a home in Northwest D.C.

This was all done for a cable show for Investigation Discovery on women who fall in love and marry prisoners.

I am not sure what is more disturbing: the fact that police are now rented out like cheap extras or that a raid is conducted with county cars for a cheap cable show. They are not alone in this theater of the absurd, here.

For the full story, click here.

117 thoughts on “Invasion! Montgomery County Police Cross State Line and Conduct Raid in Washington D.C.”

  1. AY,

    The damage is done. You’re throwing matches in that bonfire. Our host has directly asked for a cessation of hostilities between regulars on this thread. Walk away.

  2. Patty C or whoever this may be today,

    Look at the similarities between Patty C and Sil1 writtings. I think yo are in dire need of professional assistance.

    Either drink your swill and take the proper dosage of your medication as you once again have prove that female dogs are a higher life form than you could ever achieve. As a matter of fact I have more respect for a mule than you. They bray better than you. Please do not respond again directly to my post.

  3. Prof:

    “I am running out of shining objects to distract our regulars from each other.”

    Homo Sapiens is a little harder to distract than pongo pygmaeus.

  4. As I have posted before, I have always assumed that there are two rules at this site:

    Rule 1: JT makes the rules.

    Rule 2: See Rule 1.

  5. AY,

    Oh absolutely. You mistake me for being angry I suppose, but I’ve actually only gotten angry here once – and it got me edited too, a price I was willing to pay at the time and a cost I knew before I responded. Other than that, I’m almost never angry IRL or in here. My normal state is of detached amusement. The attacks now are entering the recycled phase of “I’m a douche” of some sort, but none of them have done anything but damage the attacker. I’m cat like in the respect I play with my food. I’ll get bored eventually. In fact, I’m getting bored with it rapidly, but it’s been a slow week at the office. I hope to alleviate the ennui by taking the Donzi to the lake this weekend.

  6. Buddha,

    You’re ignorance is absolutely breathtaking.

    You can not even see, you are so blinded by it, how ineffective you are at making any points.

    Your m.o. of making a point is to insult and use ad hominem attacks which end up only exposing your own biases and ignorance in your ability to express yourself.

    You are biased against anyone who is not taken in by your facade so you try to discredit them. Even when that person is articulating a position onf which you daily rant against (Coruption)

    But you are so vain and lacking in self confidence and feel threatened by anyone who doesn’t blindly become one of your sychophants, you are so fueled by the dramatic bias raging inside you that you attack that person. You come off assaulting all the stances that you defend. And you do it only b/c your sick ego forces you to do so.

    What? are you trying to say that I did not bring up any relevance that the system is corrupt.

    You are the worse liar to yourself I have ever seen.

    At least Mespo is coming from a bias where he disapproves of my representation of a shared ethnicity.

    At least Mespo is coming from a bias where he was on different sides as far as the justice debate.

    Although I work to play tit-for=-tat w/Mespo, it is an agree-to-disagree w/him b/c he will obviously maintain his bias being that he is part of the profession while my experiences came from the other side. He has more relevance although he does try to soil me w/an irrelevance of a felony conviction.

    But you only expose your dramatic bias for all to see b/c you will compromise your own principles in your imature need to satisfy your ego.

    You think that constantly calling me a felon is winning you points. And although that may work w/some other ignorants it is only a shield to protect your ignorance, lack of ability to articulate, and need to get glory from the rest.

    You are obviously threatened by my ability to expose you, the relevant points I make and my refusal to be another one of your water carriers.

    Remember, I rage against the corruption of the system as much as you. I have had first had experience b/c of my felony conviction. I do NOT cry for myself but for the poor souls who have suffered a fate worse than death> I was able to have an existential change of heart and gain immeasurable sympathy for those swallowed whole by the sytem b/c I witnessed it first hand. It wasn’t explained to me in some academic setting or in some ivy-tower. I have been in the trenches. My experience gives me relevance. Something you do not respect b/c your ego will not allow it. Your attempts to besmirch me do not make you the winner they only expose all that I say about you.

    You are truly a pathetic man. And do not even waste your time responding w/more ad hominem mud-slinging b/c it is not becoming and gains you nothing.

  7. Buddha,

    Look at the similarities between Patty C and Sil1 writtings. I think you are being set up and baited.

    1. Come on folks. Let’s move on and just drop the sparing. I have given you banana-peeling lessons, Hoe license plate debates, and genie appearances in court. I am running out of shining objects to distract our regulars from each other.

  8. I will stipulate however that someone CONVICTED of a RICO violation calling anyone a fraud or dishonest is just plain funny.

    Get back to me when you can vote.

  9. Sil,

    Get stuffed, felon.

    Oh, that’s right. You already have been. Repeatedly.

  10. Thanks to Carlye for being able to see my points through my admitted vitriol.

    At least you are able to hold your biases in check to see how legitimate are my points.

    Buddha is such a vapid, vain, dishonest, lying, fraud, who is only interested in preening for his peanut gallery that he is willing to compromise

  11. AY,

    Agreed. There are times I wish this was IRC. Side channels can make dealing with this sort of thing easier.

  12. Buddha,

    I like your posts as well. I think you are funny. That is why I quit responding or commenting to Sil1 for the time being. We all have our likes and dislikes and thus far I have never seen mespo or you respond the way that you have. Some posts like Patty C or who ever she is going by and I wonder in her apparent neurosis she is posting under Sil1’s name. It would not surprise me in the least.

  13. CM and AY,

    If you guys expect me to coddle some dipstick with anger issues (no matter right, wrong or indifferent), you don’t have a very good read on me. I’m not a babysitter for the mentally ill. If I wanted that job, my ex wouldn’t be an ex. His anger and the resulting way he conducts himself is what gets him the harsh treatment he gets. It’s probably what landed him in prison too. Angry people make mistakes. Even Sun Tzu knew that.

    He’s been given more than one chance to reform his ways, so screw him. He has the option, just as others do, of not engaging me with his crap. I won’t bite him if he keeps his hand out of the cage.

    Finally, while I do like you both, I don’t work for either of you either. You don’t like it, don’t read it. I believe you’ve said the very same thing yourself about your own posts, AY.

  14. Further to my previous post. Harpers magazine site is up again so I can post a link to the most recent of Scott Horton’s articles on the Siegelman prosecution.

    For earlier articles i suggest using Google with the search string
    Alabama Siegelman “Scott Horton” and restricting the search to

    The same search string but with should also produce relevant information.

Comments are closed.