We previously saw a Fox News pie chart that had a couple extra slices (here). Now, fair and balanced math adds up to 120 percent of voters indicating that they view the science on global warming to be rigged.
This is an interesting Rasmussen poll when you add up the number and discover that you are in a parallel universe.
The question is: “In order to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming, how likely is it that some scientists have falsified research data?” According to the poll, 35 percent thought it very likely, 24 percent somewhat likely, 21 percent not very likely, and 5 percent not likely at all (15 percent weren’t sure).
This rather dubious poll is offered to show that people are dubious about the science and math of global warming experts.
For the full story, click here
Bdaman or email me, whichever you prefer.
Just put my phone on charge give me a bit and I’ll call you.
Did you want me to call you?
Byron this was not intended as a personal Attack against you. I was referencing you as to not pick out any others. I feel your views are somewhat the same as mine. If you still would like to discuss anything I can set up a seperate e-mail account so let me know. That way If things do not work out well, then I won’t have to worry about that account.
going to your website now to take a look.
Bdaman:
If I could talk to you in person, I would tell you that you are full of shit and I would tell you why. And you would believe me when I tell you and you would know my words were true. Your words are false and not attainable, that is why I think you are full of shit. When I told you why they are not attainable you would believe me and know my words were true.
here is my web address so I can tell you to your face why your words are false.
priceengineersinc_com
The Outlaw Troll Bdaman
Bdaman:
isnt that from Jeremiah Johnson? or is it a Man called Horse?
quoting the Indians in relation to GW very interesting. Are you making some sort of statement?
Elaine this is for you.
Byron
I can tell you are of mixed race, once day chatten it up like a brother, the next drawlin like a Georgia cracker. You are trilingual.
You have heard, I am the grey rider.
You know dyin aint so hard for men like you and me, it’s the livin that’s hard, when all you’ve ever cared about has been butchered or raped. Governments don’t live together, people live together. With governments you don’t always get a fair word or a fair fight. Well, I came here to give you either one, or get either one from you.
I came here so you would know that my word of death is true, and therefore my word of life is also then true.
The democrats post here the liberals post here and so will the trolls. Now I will only hunt and distort the facts same as the others do. Every election cycle when the grass turns green and the other side goes North you can rest here in peace. They can butcher some of our politicians and jerk beef with them.
The sign of the troll will be on my lodge, thats my word of life. My word of death are here in my pistols and in your rifles and I’m here for either one.
These things I say, you say we already have, Thats true. I aint promisin you nothin extra. I’m just givin them crap and they’re just givin me crap.
It’s sad that governments cheat with the speak of double tounge. There is iron in my words of death for all trolls to see, and so there is iron in my words of life. No signed paper can hold the iron, it must come from trolls. The words of polar bears also carry this iron, of life and death.
It is good that warriors such as we meet, in the struggle of life or, death.
Byron,
No templates. It’s just a gift. 😀 lol Well, it’s a gift that gives to some more than others, but hey, life isn’t fair.
Byron,
It’s the amperage that kills you. Voltage (up to a point) is harmless if there aren’t enough amps to shut down your heart or brain. Personally for him a trickle charger would the most appropriate. Something that would cause a lot of pain but slow to kill. Only fitting for the fascist driver of torture as an American value.
Buddha:
do you have a lexicon of satirical biting prose?
Geoffrey Chaucer has nothing on you.
Buddha:
“Or perhaps life in the electric chair.”
low voltage or is it wattage, I never get those straight.
Dust bowl.
Caused by poor soil practices (not rotating crops etc) in farming combined with a drought. THE DUST BOWL WAS MAN MADE ECOLOGICAL DISASTER. Not all disasters are caused by global warming. Love Canal was a man made ecological disaster. Nothing to do with global warming. Thanks for brining up an example that shows what a total distortionist propaganda tool you are and that we as a species are capable of trying to kill ourselves in multiple ways.
Again, you can’t even get the basics right, bdacherrypicker.
Also: In re “They hate me and I love it”
You are assuming again. I dislike you intensely. I said so before and I’ll gladly say so again. You’re a bad person with bad ideas and bad intentions. If you showed up in my yard? I’d turn the dogs on you. Not because I hate or even fear (snicker) you, but simply because I don’t let vermin in the yard. I don’t care about you enough to hate you. You’re not that good at your job of ruining the world for the rest of us to merit that emotional response. Your buddy Jim Byrne was better at your little lying game than you are and he’s not important enough to hate either. I save real hatred for people like your boss Cheney – a traitor who deserves to be shot on live television. Or perhaps life in the electric chair. Also on live television. The people I actually hate I can count on my fingers. You really don’t want to be on that list. You may think you do, but thinking isn’t your strong suit. But you? I could give a popcorn fart about you so, speaking for myself, if you think I hate you? You really should get over yourself. You’re simply not important enough to hate. Hatred is an active response. Disdain is passive. You’re a symptom, not the illness. Just a nasty side effect of fascism. See, I hate the illness. You’re just an itch – annoying but ultimately harmless effects of the disease actually killing America and the Constitution.
But you are not important enough or dangerous enough to merit hatred, bdaperpetuallymarginalized. Disdain and repulsion at your ignorance and bigotry, most certainly. To be singled out as a negative example and cautionary tale for sure. But hatred?
You’re a legend in your own mind, sport.
See ya around, Mr. Copy Paste Bigot.
Lottakatz:
Minuet/minute, I am glad you were able to have a laugh over that.
Bob Esq is certainly not the devil. But he does give you a “devil” of a time because of his ability to apply logic to a particular topic.
bdaman:
I can tell you are of mixed race, once day chatten it up like a brother, the next drawlin like a Georgia cracker. You are trilingual.
Obama told some congressmen at a “bi-partisan” White House meeting “republicans were scaring the electorate”. He is right, republicans are scarring me because they are not opposing his hair/lame brained schemes hard enough.
lottakatz
Was just trying to bring a little humor into the party.
Allow me to ask you, which came first?
Prolonged drought or the total misapplication of conventional tilling. Thats right, you said combination of, but, had there been no drought the soil would of been suitable for tilling.
Although the plains was under severe drought, I often wonder if it was Fludden in Texas as our beloved Jimmy Ray use to sing about. Here today, the sky is cryin and I can see the tears rollin down the street. I wish you the best, it looks like it’s gonna be a long winter for you folks in Missoura, but before ya know, you’ll be back in the field tendin to all of Gods little creation. You take care now, ya hear.
Slartibartfast
Do you think that the possibility of ruining his reputation stopped Tiger Woods from behaving badly?
I don’t think that scientists are necessarily any more worried about ruined reputations than golf stars. For some, the cult-like obsession about the earth and a seeming hatred of the human race pushes them to shoe-horn their facts into their pre-determined conclusions.
Many scientists also live in obscurity, plodding away, perhaps unappreciated by the world. And I’m afraid some might do anything to get attention or funds.
Remember the recent tragic story of the distinguished scientist who fudged the data about stem cell research? I’ve provided a link below for you if you like. There are many of these kinds of stories.
The whole culture in America was changed in the 60s based on the fraudulent research of Alfred Kinsey. Your proposal seems to simplify human nature too much as it seems to presume that scientists are not similarly susceptible to human emotions like we are because they deal with things logical.
I saw an interview this evening with Anderson Cooper, I believe, where the fellow who was spoken about badly in the “Climate-Gate” emails said even the SOFTWARE codes used for collecting the data (or for the climate models) was intentionally shoddy and responsible for yielding some these absurd predictions and results.
For some scientists the absolute power they derive from the thought of controlling the whole world is far too tempting to walk away from. And since the perpetrators of any false predictions will be running the show, their reputations may never be “destroyed” until they are long gone from this earth. In other words, the lunatics will be running the asylum. The status of their reputation will be irrelevant for a very long time because they control the information.
Following the money is just the easiest way to see what it going on. It is a sort of radioactive dye that lets us see the flow of the life-blood within the structure.
Human nature is such that when absolute power is laid at your feet, common sense and integrity are generally thrown overboard.
I think we give scientists too much slack for not being as flawed and subject to bad characteristics as the rest of us.
And I think it is extremely dangerous to put them on a pedestal.
Story of Hwang Woo Suk (stem cell scandal)
http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/h/hwang_woo_suk/index.html
Info on Study of Dishonest Scientists and Researchers
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article6425036.ece
P.S.
This is the ninth anniversary of the day Scalia & cadre stabbed the constitution in the back:
http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/Supreme_Court/orders/2000/00-949.html
Vincent Bugliosi: “In yet another piece of incriminating circumstantial evidence, Scalia, in granting Bush’s application for the stay, wrote that “the issuance of the stay suggests that a majority of the Court, while not deciding the issues presented, believe that the petitioner [Bush] has a substantial probability of success.” But Antonin, why would you believe this when neither side had submitted written briefs yet (they were due the following day, Sunday, by 4 pm), nor had there even been oral arguments (set for 11 am on Monday)? It wouldn’t be because you had already made up your mind on what you were determined to do, come hell or high water, would it? Antonin, take it from an experienced prosecutor–you’re as guilty as sin. In my prosecutorial days, I’ve had some worthy opponents. You wouldn’t be one of them. Your guilt is so obvious that if I thought more of you I’d feel constrained to blush for you.”
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010205/bugliosi/single
Byron–
Folks on the left are just as much to blame as folks on the right when it comes to NIMBY.