Newspapers are reporting that the United States State Department under Hillary Clinton made the extraordinary decision to refuse assistance requested by the United Arab Emirates into the assassination of a top Hamas commander. Israel’s Mossad is widely viewed as responsible for the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhoh, which broke a host of international and domestic laws. The reports are based on Wikileaks documents and again suggests that the Administration misled the public in its position on the assassination.
The article below notes that the U.S. denied publicly that it had received a request for assistance from Dubai. The Obama Administration stands accused of not only refusing assistance but lying about the request.
The newspaper reports that senior U.A.E. officials asked the American ambassador and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to probe urgently “cardholder details and related information for credit cards reportedly issued by a U.S. bank to several suspects” in the murder. That is a critical piece of evidence that could have established links while the trail was hot in the investigation. It has long been doubted that the United States would assist in an investigation that would embarrass Israel.
If true, this is another dangerous example of politics trumping principle. What happens when we need information from UAE in a future case in pursuing, for example, an Iranian conspiracy. Countries may find themselves similarly ill-disposed to assist the United States.
Source: Haaretz
Buckeye:
I’m not surprised that people at a legal blog are unfamiliar with the legal meaning of genocide. Nothing would surprise me more except if the human race actually got wiser.
You appear to be unaware that destroying a religion or culture IS an act of genocide according to International Law. Your nonsensical “cultural genocide” won’t make any less genocide. Neither will your de-fanged “ethnocide” (hilarious). What’s the difference? Genocide by any other name is still genocide. But, if you want to play word games, you could even call rape unwanted affections and ignore that too. Genocide doesn’t have to be violent either, according to the law.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that genocide refers only to race. It doesn’t. Destruction of a culture or religion is also genocide. Your opinion doesn’t rewriting the law make.
You do err (out of ignorance apparently) that to be genocide, the destruction has to occur completely. It doesn’t. To fit the legal definition (established in 1947) all that is needed to meet the criteria is for genocide to occur at least in part. So the stats you supplied do not make your point, they make mine since whites used to be about 90 percent of the US population.
Two things must happen legally. The destruction must be actual (meaning something or someone has been targeted and is missing, disappearing, gone, or going away). And second, it must be intentional.
So it is stunning that you quote the genocide stats as if they were THE good news. They are part of the evidence of intent.
Our government KNOWS that genocide is going on because they track of it statistically, even make those numbers available to you, and continue on with the same immigration policy that favors non-white immigration. This is completely intentional or they wouldn’t be doing it. These are the smart people in charge. I’m only the Nazi moron pointing it out (according to some). If you want to posit that they don’t know genocide is occurring you are basically telling me that our leaders are mentally retarded. And I’m not sure you want to go there.
Your post would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.
If the government was interested in stopping the genocide it would certainly not be planning on amnesty. But it continues to let what they know is a replacement immigrant group come in in large enough numbers so that the native born population (those of European descent) cannot keep up with them reproductively should they so choose, since the government steals more money from the native-born population and gives it to the mostly non-white newcomers who out strip them in family size.
This isn’t just about one static population group out-producing the another static population group baby-wise. It is about flooding the nation and favoring the fecund group of outsiders while overwhelming the native-born population which built the country in the first place. Then forcing the native-born population to fund it at the literal and physical expense of the native-born population. And this also to their personal detriment and the detriment of their families and offspring.
As a result of government actions whites especially become less able to produce their own offspring who they know would suffer under the burden of funding their own AND the larger families of prolific immigrant groups who come for handouts (read: those predisposed to Marxism and thus the Democratic Party).
Government is intentionally bringing in these people to replace the white population. If it needed a larger population it would have help American families have them. Instead, it is replacing them and charging them with the bill for it.
The government (Democrats)are in a bind. They slaughtered over 48 million Americans who didn’t have families and now there isn’t enough tax money (not enough people to tax) to fund their Marxist schemes (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) etc. They’ve run the numbers and white people must go. Ultimately that will fail too and the replacement population will look like Mexico: poor and oppressed. But today’s power grab is all that matters.
It’s the bottom line thing. Always follow the money. The Marxists think as much about money as the capitalists are alleged to do and the whites are too expensive. Everyone is too expensive, but don’t expect an evil Marxist to figure that out.
Buckeye, is it genocide because government conducts it and it knows it. It is intentional and you provided the world with the statistical evidence to help prove the case. I thank you.
Who is paying for the medical benefits of the young Hispanics who outstrip the whites family size? Is it not largely the white families? Of course it is. Whites are being forced by law (government) to pay for the medical benefits for a massive but recent foreign population such that they outstrip them in family size. Whites cannot have their own large families when they have to also support the larger nonwhite families, by law, and by force.
How easy it would have been to have a large family if I knew the government would take care of it!
You know, I could have done that. But I’m an honest person and refused to do so. I’m decent. I don’t steal other peoples money and call it welfare. I’ve lived below the poverty line and never took a dime from government. I even home-schooled my child which means I payed for someone elses kid to get educated and didn’t have my own there. Since I went to public school I’m even with the government. Fair enough.
I went for 10 years without medical insurance and I never greedily took other peoples money to pay my bills for it nor did I demand it. Hispanics have made this a way of life and it is sleazy and immoral. And who will be receiving less medical care because of the new, largely non-white, citizens with bigger families and lower incomes? Old, frail, white senior citizens, that’s who.
Again, this is rank and open genocide against whites.
That which belongs to the old frail white Americans who put money into the system for decades is being redistributed to the young, vigorous, fecund new citizen who have put virtually nothing into the system thus far and indeed have taken more than any other immigrant group yet.
Call it a bloodless genocide, but please, call it genocide.
Each week I stand in line at Wal Mart agonizing over my grocery bill (one child only) while hundreds of Hispanics with 3, 4, 5, and 6 children per family with 2 to 3 shopping carts each loaded with extravagant food stand before me with their food stamp and WIC sheets.
That is criminal.
And it is genocide. And Democrats love it.
My parents were dirt poor, jobless, and suffered. They were 19 years old when they started their family. They were young and strong and never took a dime from the government. Oh wait. They once took a brick of cheese when both were out of work and had hungry mouths to feed.
They were embarrassed and never went back. That is because, unlike the young strong immigrant of today, they were decent folks.
I also recall mother telling me it took them ten years to pay off my birth.
My folks had integrity. They were once Democrats. But no longer. Democrats have no integrity. They are simply common street thugs and mobsters with power.
And they are genocidal maniacs.
Lottakatz just to be clear the only part of my last comment above that was mine was the part about Frank Marshall Davis. The top half was a copy of part of Tooties comment.
I think tootie has repeatedly displayed an entire disconnect from the real world in its posts. It has never once exhibited even a tiny bit of awareness or an ability to be educated when presented with fact. Therefore it is useless to engage it in any rational conversation. The only possible solution is to ignore any post from tootie. Don’t bother reading it as it is either a troll attack or the rantings of a person deeply in need of mental health assistance. Certainly don’t respond as there is nothing to be gained – you will not have a decent, intelligent exchange and past experience indicates that tootie will not be swayed by silly things like facts or reality.
Heydrich:
I’m not the one provoking a revolution in order to create a dictatorship, Obama is (through fundamental change and redistribution). I’m not the one who said that, he did. I like America. He doesn’t. Don’t blame me.
It appears to offend you that I point out Obama’s revolutionary subversions. I know for sure that what he is doing always leads to dictatorship and subjugation. Moreover, HE knows this too. You seem to be the one left out of the loop. He know this because he was schooled in it from his youth and throughout his formative years. I, on the other hand, wasn’t. I’m not the usurper. He is. I’m the one who adores her country. He doesn’t.
This, apparently, appeals to you. Okay, I get it. But don’t make me the bad guy for pointing it out. And don’t let your embarrassment over it make you run off the intellectual rails. Hang on. And think.
I’m the one demanding adherence to the Constitution. It was a thing once considered noble, but now, apparently, worthy of derision. I’m not going to apologize for insisting that Obama adhere to it (his oath in particular). And I’m not going to apologize for insisting the genocide in America stop.
I have no power. Obama has it all. I have no force. And Obama has us by the gonads, literally. He is even making us criminals if we do not surrender our personal, private, and intimate medical information to him even though we have not committed a crime nor have been served a warrant for having so been accused. Who is the danger? Me who doesn’t seek to invade the rights of the innocent, or him that does? Me who opposes the invasion of rights or you who defends him that does?
You are not thinking rationally.
Obama has read the revolutionary material about how to create dictatorship and subjugation. Perhaps you have as well, but you don’t believe he is replicating it. Fine. Live in denial. And please, go ahead and continue to pretend cause and effect doesn’t apply to human political action as much as it does to chemistry or physics. But it does. In reality, I know you know this. But it do so even if you pretend to ignore it. Obama knows government can do one thing and another thing results. And he knows how to destabilize a political environment and is doing just that. All despite your denials and embarrassment.
You have a hissy fit about me but it is Obama who is doing what Europe (the Marxists) did before the rise of Hitler. Let me make it plain: Marxism leads to dictatorship and authoritarian rule (despotisms). Obama knows this; it is his goal. Obama is not Hitler; he is Marx. Obama is not Napoleon; he is Robespierre. He is the destabilizer.
You appear to be embarrassed that I am calling him out for his conduct leading to destabilization, despotism, and subjugation. I guess this is because you fell for it all or got sucked in by his lies.
Get over it. Grow up. Move on.
The biggest genocide in the history of the world (begun by whites themselves long before Obama “served” as a government official) is occurring as we speak here in America. Perhaps you respond as you do because it might also be a little embarrassing for the superist-duperist legal theory blog groopies in America to have had the largest genocide in the history of the world happen right under their noses and didn’t notice it. Oh, and its happening to them most likely. Ouch. The Bible calls this sort of thing straining at gnats and swallowing camels. Good job. Good job.
Yes, when the biggest legal violation in the history of the world occurs the legal eagles are sleeping at the wheel. Instead, they were off on bunny trials wringing their poor little hands about Tea Party folks not liking excessive taxation and unlimited government. Oh gosh, what evil people they are. They want to keep their property and have more freedom.
On top of that insult, there’s the embarrassment of the legal eagles having to see a pink-collar nobody, not schooled in the law, not a recipient of a privileged life, nor fine education point out the oversight of genocide big enough to swallow half a continent. That’s got to rub the superior folks (superior to me, certainly) quite raw.
Just WHEN might you get off your intellectual duff and notice that whites are becoming a minority in their own country against their will and consent? When might you exercise your intellectual superiority in that cause since we are talking about over a quarter of a billion people (including the replacement population)?
Will you get off your duff when whites are 40 percent of the US population? When they are 20 percent? Do you even care? Or is it that genocide against whites is appealing to you? No problem? Big deal? Excellent? Eh?
Ahhhhhhhhhh. Are you a brown supremacist? Come on. Fess up. I want to know.
Where do you think, in the whole-wide nonwhite world, a government could replace a whole racial population with another (for example replace most of the Nigerians with white folks) and get away with that crime? I sure don’t know. But I do know that the people of this blog would be in an frothing, hysterical uproar. And I do know of a legal blog where such a thing can be occurring to white folks and no one but a little nobody is pointing it out and getting accused of being the wrong-doer.
That much I can tell you.
It appears you have read history but it seems that you don’t know what it means. You don’t seem to be able to connect the past with the present. So, at the most highest levels of intellectual competency when rational thought and reasoning is most needed to avoid widespread human catastrophe, it would seem you are, for the purposes of avoiding an error as grave as continental-wide genocide, in a sense, functionally illiterate.
Tootie
You may mean Cultural Genocide or Ethnocide rather than Genocide. Merely outpopulating wouldn’t meet any of those definitions, but you don’t have to worry about that either.
The Census Bureau projects the U.S. population by 2050 (how old will you be by then? I probably won’t be here.) will be as follows:
White (non-hispanic) 52.8%
Black (non-hispanic) 13.2%
Hispanic/Latino 24.3%
What you really need to worry about is the Asians. They will double to 8.9%. Egad!
P.S. As a Methodist, I’m curious about our contribution to this mayhem. Could you elaborate?
Tootie:
my little flower, you have learned well. I see the copy of Mien Kampf autographed by the Fuhrer has been well studied.
The Marxist will have their day and then the white race will rise from the ashes of the Obama Presidency like a Phoenix and the 4th Reich can begin.
Heil Hitler,
Rynhardt
ps great line about the Catholics
pss are you f….ing serious? If you are, you scare me more than Obama does. What state do you live in so I can avoid it, like the plague.
rafflaw:
See the above post if you wish. There is the explanation of Kennedy and genocide. I am charging him with it because no one else will. Mind you, the Catholic Church has been particularly aggressive in supporting the Hispanic invaders.
Richard Neuhaus (a catholic, he is now dead) wrote this in 2001 and things haven’t changed much:
“Ten of the eighty-four positions taken are in the category of migration and refugee issues before Congress. Here, too, questions could be raised, but the fact is that on immigration the U.S. bishops take pretty much the position of The Wall Street Journal, which, only half tongue in cheek, calls for a constitutional amendment abolishing national borders. The Catholic Church is the largest, and possibly the most effective, pro–immigration organization in the country. This has everything to do with strategic and pastoral planning, reflecting the fact that Latinos constitute at least a quarter of the more than sixty million Catholics in the U.S., and some expect they will be half the Catholic population by the middle of the century. Can moral arguments backed by Catholic social doctrine be mustered in support of limiting or even cutting back on immigration? Certainly. But my impression is that making them is like spitting in the wind. On this question, the bishops have a long–standing and settled conviction—not unrelated to the immigrant history of Catholicism in this country—that a generous immigration policy is good for poor people seeking opportunity, good for America, and good for the Catholic Church.”
Archbishop Roger Cardinal Mahony (L.A.)advocates violating immigration law and promotes amnesty. The Catholic Church is committed to overrunning the country with Catholic “immigrants” viz a viz the Hispanic invasion from the south.
Oddly the stupid Methodists and Lutherans are at it too, but not as much as the Catholics. I guess they need to prove something.
Gyges:
Ted Kennedy was in charge of the committee which was responsible for the Immigration Act of 1965. To sell the Act to the public, Kennedy and others promised the American people (most of them white) that the new policy would not change the ethnic make-up of the American people. The law passed.
Kennedy, having sat through the many decades thereafter knew full well (through the statistical data possessed by the US government) that not only was the ethnic makeup of the American people being affected, but it was being completely reversed such that the people he made his promise (his lie) to were not only no longer retaining their ethnic makeup but were indeed LOSING it and becoming minority status in their own country against their will and his promise.
This is the very definition of genocide.
To be genocide, government officials must know that the actions they are taking (whether violent or not) are eliminating an ethnic group, race, religion or culture (in part or in full) against the consent of that group. This is precisely and exactly what is occurring and government officials know it.
Obama knows this as well or he is am imbecile. And from what Democrats tell me, he is brilliant.
Kennedy knew, certainly since Reagan’s time, that Catholics were benefiting from amnesty and the invasion by Hispanics. He knew this when he tried to push amnesty just before he died. This too is the legal definition genocide. What Americans didn’t understand under Reagan, Kennedy completely understood.
The rest of the world doesn’t have an opinion about the genocide in America because they are not aware of it. No one is talking about this issue but me so it is somewhat silly of your to speak for the world and tell us what their conclusion is especially since “the world” hasn’t weighed in on the subject.
The majority of the world’s population is nonwhite. And it seems to not register on their radar when genocide is committed against whites.
Call me surprised.
Tootie,
I was brought up Catholic and yet I believe that the Catholic Church has considered women a second class citizen. Does that make me a women hater?
Tootie,
with all due respect, I don’t know where you get this stuff. What is the factual source for your claim that Ted Kennedy was involved in a genocide of Protestants?
Mike:
Okay. Here’s some stuff (other than yours). It’s Shelby Steele and you don’t have to read it. It’s a video (an interview at Stanford’s Hoover Institute).
The remarks from about 12:00 to 15:00 are particularly interesting. At about 16:00, Steele says that Obama lets whites off the “guilt” hook (whereas Jesse Jackson doesn’t unless you give him something) and that is why Obama was so popular and elected. I believe that Obama lets whites off the hook only apparently, but not actually. And my impression of that is based on his 20 years at a black supremacist church and his attack on white elderly folks through the Obamacare among other things (like protecting the New Black Panthers). Also interesting are the comments about whites at about 18:00:
http://www.feentv.com/view/1w614q96j/shelby-steele-on-president-elect-obama/
For those of you who don’t know Steele he, like Obama, is biracial (having a white mother and black father).
Mr. Fox, we need someone to investigate the recent spate of chicken abductions at our henhouse.
Tootie,
That was a pop culture reference.I’ll give you full credit for believing what you say. You actually think that Ted Kennedy was in charge of “the deliberate and systematic destruction” of the Presbyterians.
It’s just that the rest of the world disagrees.
ATTENTION POSTERS:
If Thom Sowell runs for prez, I’d vote for him.
Lottakatz:
Yeah, it was always about Bill Clinton being our first black president. And before that it was about Jimmy Carter. He musta been a black president incognito. I didn’t like them either and was an activist because I knew that deep down they were black folks.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Gyges: I know exactly what the word genocide means. And I challenge you to prove I am using it inaccurately.
Mike: I read your stuff.
Jill:
I didn’t say Obama hated whites. You did.
I repudiate racism, but I don’t believe Obama does. The evidence is the racist church he went to for 20 years.
I talk frankly about race and that makes me subject to charges of racism by imbeciles. So be it. I’m not afraid of the imbeciles. I actually am not one of the racial cowards Attorney General Holder speaks about and so I go on with Holders proposal for a frank discussion which no one (mostly whites) refuse to engage in. I have guts to face the issue head on because no matter how sensitive the topic, the truth has to be pursued.
Obama is the one who went 20 years to a church which not only preached and taught black supremacy, but sold books about the subject at the church book store.
I wouldn’t attend a church that taught white supremacy or even hinted at it. This is because I am not a racist.
I’m sorry Obama was hurt by whites. It has skewed his moral development. But I didn’t hurt him and I want him to stop hurting me.
Any chickens he feels the need to come home to roost he should keep to himself and stop making them public policy.
This report is particularly disturbing because it provides strong confirmation that we will support whatever Israel chooses to do, regardless of the moral implications, and even when it is not in our own long-term interests.
Tootie, your post is bizarre, disturbing and delusional. I mean that seriously. I can find absolutely no factual support in your comments for any of your conclusions. I have no idea where your “information” comes from, but I’d certainly be interested in finding out your reading list.
Bdaman: “They thought he was black (because he looks it), but he knew he was half white.”
—
The white half isn’t the half that’s making people’s heads explode.
I went looking for a link to the “one drop rule” and it’s variants (to make some point about the historical nature of racism; just do a search) which ended in the SCOTUS decision striking down miscegenation laws and found this in the body of an article and it bears repeating: (from Loving v. Virginia)
**
“In its decision, the court wrote:
“ Marriage is one of the “basic civil rights of man,” fundamental to our very existence and survival…. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State’s citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.”
**
So how come gays can’t marry? Everybody else can. I wonder if this SCOTUS will just cast aside Loving v. Virginia also when the question finally gets to them and reinterpret the 14th Amendment?