Submitted by Elaine Magliaro, Guest Blogger
All you Christian warriors out there best make ready for battle! Sean Hannity and the Catholic League’s Bill Donohue are now claiming that there is a war on Easter. “Oh no!” you say. “Who would do such a thing?” Why, Lady Gaga, comedian Ricky Gervais, and a few other dastardly demons—that’s who.
I even heard it through the grapevine that the CEO of Easter Bunnies, Inc., is hopping mad. I was told that he’s organized his bunny brigade and worked in co-operation with the president of Hatchling Chicks Corporation to devise a plan to go after anti-Easterites like Lady Gaga and Gervais.
Get your trebuchets ready! I’ll bring eggs. We’re planning to meet in Mister MacGregor’s garden tomorrow at the first light of dawn. We’ll shell the hard-boiled enemies of Easter ova and ova again until they surrender. They won’t know what hit them.
Are you ready to join me and my fellow warriors?
More about the War on Easter:
Stephen Colbert has an excellent summary of the story for us here: Easter Under Attack—Egg Edition
Fox News And Catholic League’s Bill Donohue Invent ‘War On Easter’ (Think Progress)
Easter Brings Out the Crazies (Catholic League)
Hannity – War on Easter (4.21.11) I couldn’t embed video. Here’s the link:
There you go proving my point about your argument skills again, Jimbo. Well at least I understand what the word “proportionate” means. However, it is becoming abundantly clear your momma was your daddy’s sister but that didn’t affect you none, did it, Goober? Having a family tree that looks like a stump must make things a lot easier on you. How do you find time between your busy schedule of staring at the sun while scratching yours or your dog’s balls to type on a computer?
And for the record, being called a moron by an imbecile is an insult that just makes me giggle. You even insult with all the skill of an idiot child. There is nothing you actually do well, is there Jim? I mean that others think you do well, not just yourself. Aside from the ball scratching that is. The dog said you were awesome at that.
Buddha Is Laughing
Your comment shows how stupid you are. Logically if one group is paying more than another then they are not treated equally.
You are trully a moron!!!
No, Jim. You only think you did.
Buddha Is Laughing
I just burned Ms. Liberal above.
No, Jim. I know you are English and logic impaired. I’ll say this in language you can easily understand. My last statement said:
You argue with all the skill of an idiot child.
I was trying to avoid being that blunt because I didn’t want to give idiot children a bad name.
Ah lookie, lokkie, the Liberal pants are in a knot. Bet she don’t wear no bra, so we should all call her Lieal. Her lilly white ass don’t know it from shinola.
Stamford Liberal
2. Pertaining to Connecticut motor vehicle registration requirements, in order for anyone – including the poor – to either register or re-register a vehicle, one must provide evidence of insurance (with further proof supplied by correspondence directly from the insurance companies to the DMV) and one must provide evidence that all outstanding motor vehicle tax debt is paid-in-full (with further proof supplied directly to the DMV by the Department of Revenue Services);
I wonder how many Connecticut drivers actually have Rhode Island, Massachusetts, or New York vehicles to avoid the taxes?
Stamford Liberal
Pertaining to taxes and the poor – I also bluntly stated that in this country as a whole, while the poor may not pay income taxes, they pay sales taxes, social security taxes and medicare taxes.
You idiot. The middle class and rich pay all of those to plus income taxes. Therefore you are making the case that not everyone is treated equally.
Buddha Is Laughing
Your last comment said absolutely nothing!!!!!!!
Dingleberry,
“She insinuated that the poor do pay taxes because of the Connecticut requirements.”
Corrections, fruit cake:
1. I didn’t insinuate – I bluntly stated (big difference between insinuating and bluntly stating, sport);
2. Pertaining to Connecticut motor vehicle registration requirements, in order for anyone – including the poor – to either register or re-register a vehicle, one must provide evidence of insurance (with further proof supplied by correspondence directly from the insurance companies to the DMV) and one must provide evidence that all outstanding motor vehicle tax debt is paid-in-full (with further proof supplied directly to the DMV by the Department of Revenue Services);
3. Pertaining to taxes and the poor – I also bluntly stated that in this country as a whole, while the poor may not pay income taxes, they pay sales taxes, social security taxes and medicare taxes.
Take BIL’s advise, Jimbo. Stay in the shallow end. Just make sure your floaties are fully-inflated.
Jim,
No. I wouldn’t. Because if this is your A game, it’s truly pathetic from a technical standpoint. Hell, if this is your C game it’s truly pathetic from a technical standpoint.
You’re a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. Your tactics are ill-conceived and poorly executed and your substance is non-existent.
Other than displaying your simple racism and a pronounced fondness for prosperity theology that is.
This is the deep end of the pool.
You’d be better off swimming in the shallow end.
Buddha Is Laughing
You would be surprised on how good my skills are. Stamford liberal made a blunder. She insinuated that the poor do pay taxes because of the Connecticut requirements. Connecticut is one of 50 states and I quickly pointed out she knows nothing about the Southern border and how people easily avoid the registration taxes.
BIL,
I couldn’t have said it better myself 🙂
Jim,
Not to answer for her, but based on what I know of her from past interactions, I’m pretty sure SL would still think “you got your ass handed to you and instead of owning up to it (so much for accountability), like the coward you are, you are now trying veer off in another direction” no matter where she lived.
Why?
Because that’s a valid criticism of your methodology (such as it is).
Many of the people here are trained to argue or in logic. The tactic is called “moving the goalpost”. Among those with professional training, that’s considered an amateur night tactic but especially when handled as ham-fisted as you’ve handled it.
Plus, “you didn’t say anything that means I’m right” is the argument of a child. Silence does not equate to avoidance does not equate to victory. Just because no one responds does not mean you are by default correct. Sometimes it just means people think you are a buffoon.
You really don’t have the skills to argue here.
Stamford Liberal
If you lived here you would have a different tune. This is why there are so many people in the border states wanting immigration reform.
Dingleberry,
Not avoiding at all. Just not playing your typical troll’s game, fruit loop – you got your ass handed to you and instead of owning up to it (so much for accountability), like the coward you are, you are now trying veer off in another direction.
Now, go stamp your feet and hold your breath until your face turns blue, baby.
Stamford Liberal
The answer is “I can’t say no because there probably are.” Since there are, there are those avoiding paying taxes.
Stamford Liberal
Actually your avoidance is proof positive that I am right!
Dingleberry,
Tsk, tsk … trying to change the rules when you finally figured out you’re flailing … how pathetic.
Of course the last time we had someone drive as bad to need emergency services such as the police/trooper was George Bush. I still remember when he was arrested.