A Real History of the Last Sixty-Two Years?

Submitted by: Mike Spindell, Guest Blogger

Being in my late 60’s and having grown up in a liberal family, politics and history have been always among my greatest interests. Those much younger than I would no doubt list 9/11 as the most traumatizing historical event of their lifetime. While 9/11 of course affected me greatly, no historical event in my life has affected me as much as the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I believe that it traumatized my generation so extensively that most of us have not been able to fully believe in our country and its government since that tragic day and its aftermath. Most Americans alive today, who were born in 1960, or afterwards, have only second hand accounts of the total turbulence of the 60’s and the trauma experienced by those who lived through it. There is no doubt that 9/11 has traumatized this nation, but initially it drew most of us together, only to have that unity frittered away by the Bush Administration. The 60’s did that for my generation and that trauma led directly to our current political chaos and deep distrust of government as my generation took the reins of political power.

To most people growing up in the 50’s, on its surface America was the land of opportunity. The USA was a great democracy, unparalleled in human history in the prosperity of its citizens and its standing among nations. For many though, there were obvious cracks in this version of the America Myth. If you were a Black American you faced the viciousness of “Jim Crow” in the South and the somewhat more “genteel” racism pervading the rest of the country. People of Spanish speaking heritage also faced the status of second class citizenship. Native American’s were treated just as badly as they had been from the first European landing on these their shores. Women were, with few exceptions, expected to be subservient to male expectations and were uniformly portrayed as being intellectually inferior. Homosexuals were viciously and violently persecuted. And so it went in 1950’s America. Some great white writers like Mailer, Kerouac, Steinbeck and many others were taking on the myth of the America Dream. Africa American writers like Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison and James Baldwin were standing on the shoulders of their predecessors from the Harlem Renaissance, in exposing the oppression Black people faced. There was among many Americans a weariness of the canards of the Eisenhower Administration, the fear based militarism of the Cold War and a recognition that all was not well with a good portion of the population. There was also for many, a hope for purposefulness in their own lives, beyond marriage, house in the suburbs, new car and two kids.

Arriving on the scene, promising to revitalize the country, was JFK, a brilliant speaker, handsome man and charismatic leader. He won a close election against the unlikable Richard Nixon and proceeded to galvanize the nation with the dreams of his New Frontier. JFK also was the source of great enmity among the Washington Establishment. Seen as nouveau riche by the plutocracy, too idealistic and naïve by the Defense, State Departments and CIA, hated by J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI, too “Nigra Friendly” for Southern racists and a threat to the “business as usual” Corporate status quo. He was murdered on a Friday Afternoon in 1963 as my University suspended activities and I sat with friends stunned with grief listening to a car radio and puffing Marlboro’s. That day is etched permanently in my mind and the disturbing events that followed it throughout those turbulent 1960’s forever changed the way I viewed the world. Lee Harvey Oswald was improbably murdered as I watched on TV that Sunday; a flawed Warren Commission Report arrived filled with holes; the murder of Martin Luther King and then Bobby Kennedy; along with the prosecution of a vicious and illegal war; with all this my faith in American Democracy and exceptionalism faded into skeptical disbelief. Life for us ordinary citizens, however, still went on and pleasure, friends, lovers, spouses, families and careers took up most of our time and attention.  Nevertheless I devoured everything I could read about the JFK murder and indeed about the history taking place as I lived my mundane life. Recently a book brought all those strange feelings back to the surface and provided a possible explanation why our world seems so much crazier these days.

The book I want to discuss is “Family of Secrets” subtitled “The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government, And the Hidden History of The Last Fifty Years”. It is written by Russ Baker, an investigative journalist formerly of the New York Times. His excellent website is: http://whowhatwhy.com/. While George W. Bush was President I and others kept referring to the Administration as “The Bush Crime Family”. Reading this book, if it gives the true picture, I didn’t know how accurate that appellation could be. This is a book of more than 500 pages of narrative and perhaps 100 more pages of notes and footnotes. Thus it is far too large for me to provide more than a review and overview. To be honest I can’t do the book justice, simply because it provides a narrative that captures you into this sordid tale of a plutocratic America family and because knowing the outcomes of much it discusses, I found that I could only read it in spurts, so painful were its revelations.

Let me summarize it in this manner. The Bush Family dating back to Senator Prescott Bush has aspired to not only great power, but great wealth and has operated as both representative and agents of the “elite” class of American families, who believe it is both their destiny and their duty to rule this country, through whatever means available. In the minds of this class they are beyond the restraints of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Legal System. At times this “elite” acted as both partners of and agents for, foreign interests and indeed see the aims of those interests identical to their own.

When discussing specific Bush family member’s deeds, the highlights are as follows:

Sen. Prescott Bush: Co-conspirator in a plot to overthrow FDR. Financier of NAZI causes via a banking partnership with John Foster and Alan Dulles. Head of the Senate Intelligence Oversight Committee approving/abetting CIA foreign assassinations.

President George (Poppy) H.W. Bush: High Level CIA Agent. Possible Conspirator in the JFK Assassination.  Possible Conspirator in the Watergate Affair as a CIA plot to remove Richard Nixon. Major Conspirator and Impeller of the Iran/Contra Affair. Started the First Iraq War. Possible 9/11 conspirator.

George W. Bush: Possible role in 9/11. Creator of a War Against Iraq, Terror, etc., etc., etc. Approved torture as a viable intelligence method. Approved unconstitutional methods of surveillance of citizens. Bankrupted the country with tax cuts targeted to the “elite” and bailed out a corrupt banking system, with no strings attached.

Obviously, these are pretty heady and serious claims for an author to make. Russ Baker, from my view, backs up what he says with pristine documentation and with supplying the complex context of interlocking individuals. What I find the most amazing is how he shows that the Bush Family friendships and alliances go across party lines and the specific individuals who are all intertwined with these major events to produce a convincing case for foul deeds and conspiracies that could leave us all with a bitter view of the history we’ve been fed.

Let me provide my own possible schematic scenario for some of this thread of history:

  1. Eisenhower, astute in military politics, yet a novice in national politics is offered the Republican nomination and is elected President. His advisers help him choose John Foster Dulles and his brother Alan, both closely aligned with Wall Street, oil interests and the CIA. These extreme cold warriors shape US foreign policy. Ike’s heart attack causes him to allow Richard Nixon to assume many Administration intelligence duties and foreign policy roles. With Nixon as its “case officer” the invasion of Cuba is planned. Nixon unexpectedly loses the Presidency to JFK, who Nixon believes stole the election. As he leaves office Ike cautions Americans to “beware of the Military Industrial Complex.
  2. George H.W. (Poppy) Bush goes into the oil business a novice, yet through his father’s connections establishes alliances with some of the biggest players in Texas oil. Establishes a company with two divisions. One is a CIA front and Bush travels the world presumably as a CIA operative, on purported oil business, even though many locations visited have little to do with oil.
  3. JFK reluctantly approves what becomes the “Bay of Pigs” operation, but refuses to back it up with a US invasion. Thereby gaining the enmity of the CIA and Foreign Policy Establishment. JFK’s experience with the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis leads him and RFK to become suspicious of the Foreign Policy/Defense “Experts” within his administration and their advice. As the US involvement in Viet Nam starts to escalate, giving lie to the “Experts” advice he begins to contemplate withdrawal from Viet Nam. He is murdered 11/22/63. George (Poppy) Bush is in Dallas on that day, as was Nixon the night before.
  4. LBJ becomes President. Appoints the Warren Commission led by Alan Dulles, who was fired by JFK and hated him. LBJ and Poppy Bush both were closely involved with Texas power firm Brown & Root Corporation, which had CIA ties and later became Haliburton. Warren Commission Report focuses solely on Oswald, refuses to deal with inconsistencies of his history. Gerald Ford develops the “single bullet” theory. LBJ escalates the Viet Nam War pleasing the Defense/Foreign Policy “Experts”. Opposition to the war grows. Poppy Bush fails in bid to become Senator, becomes Congressman, still maintains covert CIA ties.
  5. War Protest Movement keeps growing, while Martin Luther King is morphing the Civil Rights Movement into a general movement for economic justice and against the War. CIA and FBI institute COINTELPRO. MLK assassinated as he begins to speak out more against the Viet Nam War. RFK assassinated after he wins the California Democratic Primary and becomes likely Presidential nominee. Democratic Convention riots lead to Humphrey nomination. Nixon ekes out Presidency in 1968 election.
  6. Nixon further escalates Viet Nam War. He names Poppy Bush Ambassador to China despite lack of qualification. Nixon/Kissinger cut “Experts” out of Foreign Policy and negotiate détente with China, decried by Defense/CIA/”Experts who are all “Cold Warriors”. “Plumbers” unit formed in White House, members all tied to CIA and Poppy Bush. Amateurishly bungled Watergate Burglary performed by intelligence professionals. Nixon reelected but Watergate becomes big deal. Bob Woodward, with past CIA ties, begins investigation with Carl Bernstein. Woodward gains information from “Deep Throat” that is damning. John Dean, who also has ties to Poppy Bush blabs to Congress. Andrew Jaworski, an old friend of Poppy Bush, becomes Special Prosecutor after Cox fired. Poppy Bush becomes head of Republican Party. Poppy Bush advises Nixon to resign for the good of the Party. Gerald Ford becomes President and surprises Poppy Bush by not naming Poppy Bush Vice President. Ford pardons Nixon before full charges are brought and so many details lost as the investigation stops.

Having only superficially summarized some of the details from Family of Secrets I will stop here in 1976 because this would become far too long a post were I to continue my summarization up to the present day, as does the book. My lack of detail is necessary because the connections made by the book are so intricate as to defy retelling in as short a space as I’m allowed. Here is Russ Baker himself speaking on these matters:http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/02/12/russ-baker-on-deep-history-and-little-known-origins-of-current-problems/

Here also is a direct quote from Russ Baker talking about why as we near the 50th Anniversary of JFK’s murder there is so little talk as to the strange circumstances surrounding it:

In any case, none of the films that Hollywood seems willing to tackle touch on what the great, great mass of careful investigation, research and scholarship has shown over the years—the extremely high likelihood that JFK’s death was a covert operation engineered by exactly the kinds of people whose profession was to displace leaders and carry out military-precision operations under cover. (My own book, Family of Secrets, has four chapters of new, abundantly documented and heavily footnoted material on the Kennedy assassination, including the answer to why George H.W. Bush cannot remember where he was on Nov. 22, 1963—and there are many other fine books, both recent vintage and released over the years, which carefully lay out enough evidence to settle the matter to all but the most closed-minded. Examples here, here, and here.)

Nearly half a century after the death of a President, who took bold steps against abuses by the one percent of the one percent, we are still in denial about how and why he died. Our leading institutions and individuals are not only scared to talk about the truth, but glad to cynically profit from tired lies and evasions. http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/01/23/the-deaths-of-jfk-rfk%E2%80%94and-the-silence-of-the-lambs/

My own view of the history Russ Baker reveals is that it not only seems plausible, but explains so many of the inconsistencies most people see in our history, but either ignore, or at a loss to explain. While all of this information is rather glum there is some hope to be derived from it. The Bush Family may well be plotters and executors of plots, but they are not omnipotent. G.H.W. Bush would not have been a one-term President if that were the case. I’ve said before, that I do believe that our country is run by a loosely connected oligarchy, from which the only redeeming feature is their own internal battles for power and the egos behind those struggles. Please understand though that because the JFK murder takes up a good part of my meanderings here, that is but the tip of an iceberg concealed below its apparent surface, a conspiracy of violence and greed that makes a mockery of America’s Constitution and its values. Some other links that I recommend to you to assist in your contextualizing this information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JFK_assassination_theories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFK_assassination

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLK_assassination

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_%26_Root

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Jaworski

Submitted by: Mike Spindell, Guest Blogger


83 thoughts on “A Real History of the Last Sixty-Two Years?”

  1. As Gore Vidal said: “There’s only one political party in this country – the Property Party, and it has two wings – Republicans & Democrats.”

    IMO, it’s a plausible argument to say that, since JFK was taken out, and
    replaced by an acceptable, conservative Democrat, Republicans could have rationalized that it was okay to remove the moderate-to-liberal Nixon, so that Ford – who earned HIS bones while serving on the Warren commission – could replace him. His “Go To Hell NYC” just wasn’t enough to
    overcome his other stumbles, and “Poppy” didn’t get to replace Reagan
    as quickly as he may have wished. JH played his designated Patsy role,
    but it wasn’t successful enough. Sent a message, but that attempted coup
    failed.

    And yes, of course 9/11 was a false flag operation.

  2. Excellent article Mike, as always. I recall from my youth that it was common for people to say that the Kennedy family was the biggest crime family in America. They weren’t. Thanks for the reminder even as there are calls for Jeb Bush to enter the fray or hopes that a brokered convention will deliver the nomination to him.

    Don’t go canoeing alone and stay out of garden sheds.

  3. SwM,
    That was not my solution, No names named.
    But used it as an extreme shock arousing method. And place therefore questions which lead to revealing its inadequacy.

    No, I feel it will require some areas to take the lead, devizing methods of producing democracy, even so low as the city level, and techniques for influencing the general public through open events. Teaching, informing, showing the local benefits of democracy. Of course that leaves the national scene untouched. A way to challenge and leading to change is the problem.
    How do we counter bought influence?
    More knowledgeable heads than mine are needed.

    So as we say in Sweden. misunderstand me correctly. I do not propose taking away all incumbents. The Senate is only an expression of the problem, not solely a cause or a sustainer. Our laws allow this corruption to continue. Agreed?

    No more from me but silence.

  4. Great article Mike. It is scary to imagine that any of those alleged conspiracies could be true. I will have to pick up that book!

  5. Gene H.
    Recognizing the problem IS perhaps the keystone to the answer.
    The stone which causes the rings to spread on the pond.

    Yesterday, I was struck by the realization that I had never abandoned confrontational attacking as my main strategy since childhood.
    I could attempt negotiation but would relapse into the attack mode if unsuccessful. No more on me, but it showed that knowledge and insight are necessary.for change to occur on the individual level.

    And in national politics we have great numbers who are human, but are misinformed and RWAs. There is our problem, if we take the political road and manage to find honest reps.

  6. It is too late this cycle, idealist, unless you want to replace the 23 democrats that are up with 23 anti woman right wing republicans. The primary season is nearly over. The tea party is mounting a few challenges from the right on the few moderate republicans that are left. Hope Elizabeth Warren’s race is one election where the democrats can pick up a seat.

  7. Venting with others is all well and good. As is orgnizing and effectuating local improvement or foreign improvement schemes, or even volunteering to go and help. But a problem of effecting on so many fronts which they effectively control, seems difficult for me to see a solution to.

    Cast out the Senate! Fine. Do we concentrate on some? Which? How?
    Do we attack them all? How?

    I, like most impatient souls, seek quick solutions.

  8. I get easily irate at injustice. But then have the bitter after taste of lacking some secret committee to conspire with. Exaggeration on the conspiracy search, but the need is there for all who will read this 500 page collection of documanted ill deeds—-what to do to make the anger and resolve be effective and give meaning to our hope for change.

  9. There is a lot going on here but the RepubliCon Party is the central force in the conspiracy.

  10. Gene H.
    I would normally agree. But since the common man has never had control, this seems questionable. I’m all for knowledge, but want effect..

    When we’ve seen their strength in avoiding prosecution, their ability to prepare and successfully do the Watergate torpedoing of Nixon, and their increasing control of us and the media, etc etc.

    What are our challenges?
    An enormous program of self-help., Finding how to nominate and vote for honest politicians, in sufficient numbers. If we can’t effect our reps, then only civil disobedience seem lett to take. The level of desparation is too low for that..

    Nuf for now. You write 4 lines, I reply with 12. Not good.

  11. id707,

    “One question: Does reading the book place us any closer to the goal?”

    Of course it does. One cannot address a problem if one is not aware of a problem.

  12. Like most draftees (ROTC) I was indefinitely extended with the Berlin blockade of ’61, held my breath as the Cuban faceoff on missiles and blockade occurred, and was for the day at JPL where ALL work stopped as near pandemonium reigned after JFK murder.
    Little to add other than the connection between Poppy and the Saudi regime supports the likelihood of Saudi Arabia being the one who supplied 15 of the 18 people identified as part of 9/11 and the diplomatic help rendered in USA, by dips who conveniently left the country immy post-9/11-. That which is most disturbing is the obvious way power controls perpetration, investigation and judgement.

    One question: Does reading the book place us any closer to the goal?

    Saying good work seems superfluous.

  13. I was a freshman in college when JFK was assassinated. I remember standing in front of the dorm window looking out over the campus as I listened to the reports on the radio. Outside the window no one was walking or talking but rather sitting on the ground in groups starring off into the distance. The silence was deafening.

    When I heard the news about RFK, following so closely on the heels of the assassination of MLK, I knew we were well and totally fucked and that it was all at the hands of our own government.

    RFK was murdered in June of 1968. A little less than 2 years later, on May 4, 1970, the government massacred students on the campus of Kent State University. The beat goes down; the beat goes on.

    In 5 1/2 short years (Nov. 1964 thru May 1970) the coup was completed. Trust this government? What a joke.

  14. Other than certain New Yorkers, most Americans who were traumatized on 911 were traumatized by the media, not by terrorists. Where were you on 911? Watching TV, most likely.

    If any of this were about saving lives, we’d be promoting national, regional, and local as a national security priority, given that AS MANY PEOPLE DIE EVERY MONTH IN CAR ACCIDENTS AS DIED ON 911.

    Instead, while we have some 30,000 troops in Afghanistan, and a $10 million bounty on Osama bin Laden’s head, we rush into Iraq with some 160,000 troops at a cost of some hundreds of billions of dollars, and call that the central front in the War on Terror.

    The fact is, we’ve never seen the level of terror seen in places like Northern Ireland or Israel, and we have no evidence that post-911 policies are the reason. Most high profile terror convictions have been cases of FBI entrapment.

    The assassination of JFK was a symbolic event that symbolized a tumultuous time, and came along with a number of high profile political assassinations, foreign misadventures, and domestic strife.

    Optimistically, 911 was just an excuse for a bunch of lost old Cold Warriors to kick off a new arms race (the drones ARE a game changer). Realistically, it successfully catalyzed an era of exuberant nationalism meant to serve as a massive distraction while the coup government got to work figuring out how to re-write the Constitution.

  15. “This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

    “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” (Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040)

    See also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUXtyIQjubU

  16. AY,

    I think I’ve been flagged for perhaps 40 years. As for Mr. Ford his actions and background are well documented in the book, especially his allies and patrons.

  17. Damn Michael…… If they don’t have a regular flag on you by now…..they soon will….. Did the book or article mention gerald rudolph ford….. Seems that he had his hands in the water at one time…. That’s why he became heir apparent to the Nixon legacy…

Comments are closed.