Elderly Couple In Hiding After Spike Lee Wrongly Tells Followers That Zimmerman Lives At Their Address

An elderly Florida couple in Sanford, Florida is living through a nightmare after director Spike Lee sent their address to his 250,000 followers on Twitter — wrongly stating that this was the address of George Zimmerman, the man who killed an unarmed black teen, Trayvon Martin, in Florida. It was a uniquely stupid act by Lee and invited the very type of vigilante response that Zimmerman has been accused of. The question is whether there is liability for such negligence as David McClain, 72, and his wife Elaine, 70, live in fear of threats and packages arriving at their home.

While many have raised important questions of regarding the racial and legal aspects of this tragedy, some have responded in a reckless manner. The most obvious is a small group of individuals calling themselves the New Black Panther putting a bounty on the head of Zimmerman. None of us can stop people using a tragedy like this for crime, but these are incidents that involve reckless and grossly negligent conduct.

The abuse reportedly began with a Los Angeles man shown here named Marcus Davonne Higgins, 33, and goes by the online name “maccapone.” Higgins sent the address with the instruction that “EVERYBODY REPOST THIS.” He added “Like the fat punk he is, he still lives at home with mommie & daddy.” He added on Facebook “FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT & TOUCH HIM.” Higgins, however, was not done. He proceeded to appear on the streets in protests with a sign with Zimmerman’s supposed name, address, and phone number. What is remarkable is that he put so much effort into distributing the information and little effort in confirming it.

In reality, Higgins began with a simple error. He had found the address of “George W. Zimmerman.” Martin was shot by George Michael Zimmerman. William Zimmerman is the son of the elderly couple and is listed on these records as a much older man than the shooter in Florida. The Zimmerman family reported reached out to the California man not to tweet the address and he reportedly responded “Black power all day. No justice, no peace” along with an obscenity.

Ironically, once his own name came out, Higgins has not responded to numerous inquiries. No one has released his telephone or address.

The most obvious question is whether the couple could sue Higgins and Lee. There is obvious negligence here and obvious injury. Putting aside the failure to take reasonable steps to confirm the information, the purpose of releasing this information is clearly to harass the individual or worse. It is clearly foreseeable that someone would use the information to try to harm the occupants. Indeed, people showed up at the door of the elderly couple.

One similar case that comes to mind involved a slightly different issue. Generally, internet sites have been given immunity under the Communications Decency Act, which has been used repeatedly by Web providers to bar liability. Yet, this does not prevent lawsuits that sue John Does and seek discovery from the sites to determine the identity of anonymous posters. There have been a slew of lawsuits over such postings, here and here and here.
These cases highlight the protection given to Internet companies like Craigslist and Facebook from defamation lawsuits. Under a federal law and the ruling in Zeran. The Communications Decency Act. Section 230 of the 1996 Act gives protections to online service providers from being sued for the actions of others. That section states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

Kenneth Zeran sued America Online for negligence. On April 25, 1995, an unidentified person posted a message on an AOL bulletin board advertising “Naughty Oklahoma T-shirts.” It was a prank that featured offensive products about the Oklahoma bombing and told interested buyers to call “Ken” at Zeran’s home phone number in Seattle. Zeran notified AOL in a series of telephone calls and letters about the bogus posting. But AOL allegedly refused to take down the material. Then the prankster put more messages on the site from Ken, not only producing more calls but leading an announcer for the Oklahoma radio station KRXO to read the messages and encouraged listeners to call Zeran.

The Fourth Circuit held that Section 320 blocked any liability, even if AOL was informed of the falsity and harmfulness of the information. It was a very harsh decision and it is not clear that the federal law was truly intended to protect these companies for any liability under any circumstance for false and harmful postings.

This is different in that the McClain know the names of the posters and can sue to straight negligence, including the failure to take reasonable steps once they learned of the error to inform “friends” of the error. This is more than just getting a name wrong or a face wrong. This was a deliberate attempt to encourage people to contact these people. Even if it was the real information for the shooter in Florida it was irresponsible. Courts have held people liable for the intentional tortious or criminal actions of third parties. In the Weirum v. RKO decision holding a radio station liable for injuries caused to a third party when teenagers drove recklessly to find The Real Don Steele in his marked van. The court held that the reckless driving was a foreseeable response of teenagers to the promise of free concert tickets. It is certainly foreseeable that in this super-heated controversy over the Martin shooting, some would be motivated to take violent retaliation. That is certainly the case the bounty offered by the New Black Panthers — a close analogy to Weirum.

I believe that a viable tort action could be brought by the couple to include negligence and the negligent infliction of emotional distress. That would include an action against Lee who should “Do The Right Thing” and work equally hard to make amends to this elderly couple.

Source: Smoking Gun

34 thoughts on “Elderly Couple In Hiding After Spike Lee Wrongly Tells Followers That Zimmerman Lives At Their Address”

  1. Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website.

    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to
    get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance.
    I must say you have done a very good job with this. In addition, the blog loads very quick for me
    on Opera. Excellent Blog!

  2. The ice is hard enough to skate on.I just made it!He came to the point at once.There are mice next to the refrigerator, under the sink and inside the cupboard!This wayHe used to learn everything by rote.He used to learn everything by rote.Congratulations!He has a remarkable memory.On behalf of my company, I would like to welcome you here.

  3. Howdy! I simply want to give you a big thumbs up for the excellent information you’ve got right here on this post. I’ll be returning to your web site again to check for more soon. Thanks for sharing

  4. As i was already backpacking along one special day imagining the exact secrets regarding the environment. I actually happened upon a real vivid light around the woods. This has been nothing at all like I really previously had essentially looked at prior to now. That had been light blue and even green together with a yellowish coloration. And then I personally found a huge rock that chatted toward my lifestyle while having the most remarkable signals that I had ever come across through my personal time. The item was considered a fabulous breath linked with unpolluted oxygen after the actual hardships which We had gone through in this life span. Coming from this opportunity on I actually learned that issues were going to get much better and also I really would likely find the particular catering in which We wanted intended for my personal picnic. The very party plan was going to possibly be excellent and also My partner and i feel this reality is going to be terrific once again. I personally have always been sure intending coming from this unique moment on that almost everything would certainly become as right as water plus the world would undoubtedly go with total tranquility along with my occasion and my current existence would likely remain wonderful from here on out. I simply discovered that it should mainly because of becoming downright fantastic on just about every way possible. In a earlier life We had found out that anything had been different you see. And things were regarding a absolutely diverse culture and also design. My own intuitions were definitily in balance along with the world and also mother nature. Every little thing seemed to be so good that this was awesome and also today My spouse and i was aware of this was heading to be that way once again. Before long everything would likely turn out to be most excellent and I just believe that the particular oracle stone had been totally the actual factor that I desired to be able to guide all of us to riches, abundance, as well as prosperity beyond idea. I really have got to express thanks every single day thanks to corporate event ideas dallas tx.

  5. Frankly, Mr. Lee should be brought in for questioning by both Florida officials (and any other state officials with jurisdiction) and the Feds as there seems to me to be clear evidence of felonious criminal negligence and a potential civil rights violation by Mr. Lee. I don’t care if he settled civilly – he should still be investigated and put through the ringer.

    I am not saying this because I have anything against Mr. Lee. I think, however, that he demonstrated extreme recklessness and sent a tweet that he had to have known had the potential to result in harassment, at best, and serious risk of bodily harm or death, at worst, to the residents at the address he re-tweeted.

    The most important point here is that it doesn’t make a flying fig of difference what Mr. Zimmerman did or is alleged to have done, that Mr. Lee didn’t intend for the wrong address to get re-tweeted, that he meant no harm or any other feeble attempts at mitigation. Mr. Lee knowingly tweeted to a quarter million people the address of someone whom he suggested committed a terrible crime. If Mr. Lee indicates that he did not expect or anticipate that people would read this and threaten or worse the residents of the address, he is either the dumbest person alive or the biggest liar.

    Mr. Lee, if your point was to appeal to justice in your condemnation of Mr. Zimmerman, perhaps you should have taken a moment to consider the wisdom of lowering yourself to his level. You engaged in flagrant criminal activity and should face serious criminal charges. If someone had tweeted Mr. Lee’s address in a manner that could have been seen as inciting harassment or worse, especially in a racially charged context, you can rest assured that law enforcement would have been dispatched without delay and the tactical squad would have been deployed hours ago.

    You may not be a terrible person, Mr. Lee, but you clearly and intentionally behaved like one. Shame on you – people who behave like you debase the legitimate outrage over a truly tragic event. If you have corporate sponsors for you personally or your films, I hope that they flee faster than Rush Limbaugh’s did. At least Rush didn’t give out Ms. Fluke’s alleged address in an attempt to implore people to attack her.

  6. It gets even worse, at least from my perspective… They are both now over 70 and so am I in that age bracket over 70 were the intellectual position is to “Forget about em. Just give Grand Ma and Grand Pa the magic pain pill…” If their heart fails from fear because of this vigilant mentality they will likely not get a new heart judging from the ruckus raised about Chaney getting a new heart at “Gasp” 71.. Can one over 70 or some other magic government determined age/situation expect to be accorded the right to defend himself or “gasp” the sin of all sins “get a new heart???” Or should it all be determined by some always legalize post situational discussion that takes hours rather than the seconds one must use to make the decision to save their own life or be awarded the opportunity for more living. Would this discussion have any less merit if one had taken the time to determine that Zimmerman had tutored black kids? Let the legal process begin void of the public savagery of those who believe there is intellectual merit in such bias. Where are the winners? Only those who find merit in festering such biases as they personally line their pockets with such a representative sophistry.

  7. anon nurse

    on your link they use a phrase that i like

    “iron rice bowls”
    government jobs that usually last to retirement and pay a pension until death.

    i can think of a few in our government that should lose their “iron rice bowls”

  8. For some reason it doesn’t surprise me at all that a stupid, ignorant, short-sighted racist was readily in contact with Spike Lee. Nor does it surprise me that an ignorant, vengeful mob would follow Spike Lee and hang on his every Tweet. They should sue him and take what little he has left from his 15 minutes of semi-fame.

  9. Sorry myself, RJ.
    Was forgetting that when I write “here”, it means Sweden—a place different than the USA.
    Was bragging about our right to privacy laws in Sweden which protect even against government revealing personal info.
    But ALL public documents of non-personal nature are available on request by anyone. No FOIA rigamarole. But the national security shit exists here too.

  10. Mike Appleton, thanks for the answer. I forgot to think of it that way. I was thinking that just spreading someone’s address (which is publicly available) wouldn’t create liability. But under these circumstances, you’re right, it does create a foreseeable and unreasonable risk of injury. Good to hear too because I’d love for Spike Lee to be held liable.

    Idealist, I’m sorry, I didn’t really understand your comment..

  11. RJ
    Where’s the inhibition to not scream “FIRE” in a crowded auditorium?

    Here, we are always best, have right of privacy laws, which inhibit even government agencies from spreading private info.

    What do you have equivalent? Very little it appears. Time for change before it happens to you?

  12. RJ: Each of us has a duty to refrain from conduct which we either know or ought to know will create an unreasonable risk of injury to another. In this instance, Mr. Lee intended to publish the address of an individual whom many are seeking for purposes of exacting street vengeance. Mr. Lee is charged with the knowledge that providing erroneous information could result in violent injury, or even death, to innocent people. For that matter, his liability exposure would remain even had he published the correct address, and for the same reason. Mr. Lee’s actions are on a moral plane with those of a mob attempting to remove from the county jail an inmate awaiting trial.

Comments are closed.