California Judge Refuses To Order YouTube To Remove “Innocence of Muslims”

Cindy Lee Garcia, the actress in the anti-Muslim film “Innocence of Muslims,’ has failed in her attempt to get Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Luis Lavin to order YouTube to remove the film. Garcia insists that she was not told of the real nature of the film and said that she has lived in fear since the protests erupted over the trailer of the film.

Garcia insisted that she was told that she would play a role in “Desert Warrior,” an “historical Arabian Desert adventure film.” She insists she had no idea that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was doing an anti-Muhammad film. She insisted that the film constitutes an invasion of privacy and violated copyright laws. She claims that the script did not mention Mohammed and “intentionally concealed the purpose and content of the film.” She claims that she was also never told that her voice would be dubbed in Arabic. She is claiming false light invasion of privacy, violation of publicity rights, fraud, unfair business practices, slander and intentional infliction of emotion distress.

The principle reason for the denial was the fact that Garcia was unable to serve a copy of the lawsuit on Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. She reportedly served Steven Seiden, Nakoula’s defense attorney, but Seiden said that he is not representing Nakoula in the civil matter.

However, the judge also denied the filing on the basis for the unlikelihood of prevailing on the merits.

There is some skepticism that Garcia would not have an inkling of the nature of the film or that she did not consent to the use of the film by participating in it. Yet, the dubbing of the film, if true, does create a novel claim that is worth following.

Source: Wired

22 thoughts on “California Judge Refuses To Order YouTube To Remove “Innocence of Muslims””

  1. Pirates. Pirates of the Carribean, Pirates of Somalia, Pirates of Egypt, and person with a turbin on the head preaching kill the Americans is a Pirate. Shoot em, drown em.

  2. The Muslims are reacting the same way Mohammed would react. The way they react is abominable. That means the person called Mohammed is also abominable. Why do the Qur’an shakers want to follow a teaching that is abominable?
    KJV, Pro; 6;16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren,
    Feet that follow the islamic belief system is running all over the place hooting, and a hollering about a stupid movie causing mayhem..
    Pro 4 24,Put away from thee a froward mouth, and perverse lips put far from thee.
    KJV, Proverbs 3, 32For the froward is abomination to the LORD,
    Pro 12; 22Lying lips are abomination.
    Below is part of what a person should do, but the Qur’an shakers do not do at all.
    Romans 12 >>
    King James Version
    14Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not. 15Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep. 16Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. 17Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. 19Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. 20Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. 21Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
    I cannot say rioting is good.

Comments are closed.