Submitted by: Mike Spindell, guest blogger
I must admit that I gave up watching CNN years ago, even before they attempted to become FOX News lite. Originally, as they created the standard for Cable News, they were an informative leader in providing television journalism. Because of their devotion to the news alone, they became the preferred alternative to Broadcast Network News, which at each network had been put under the “Entertainment Division” and thus viewed as a profit center, rather than a public information service. At the beginning and “golden age” of Television Network News, the FCC had mandated that each network was to provide “news” as a public service, in exchange for their license to control a band on the airways. The leader in this was CBS, a network under the aegis of William Paley, who hired war tested Journalists such as Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite. CBS News was independent of the “Entertainment Division” and as a public service wasn’t expected to turn a profit. While it is true that there was an establishment bias on all news programming yet the coverage ranging from Joe McCarthy, to the Civil Rights Movement and to the Viet Nam War informed the public of great issues and brought home the realities through pictures indelibly imprinting horrific images on the public mind. Reactionary elements within the Corporate/Military Plutocracy viewed all of this with alarm. Their continued success depended upon an uninformed public, lulled by jingoistic propaganda and unaware of who really controlled our nation. There was a determination in these elite circles that the network news, the preferred means by which the public was informed on current affairs, must be reined in. William F. Buckley had already created the meme of a “liberal news bias” by this time as an explanation of why his philosophy of the supremacy of the elite was being bought by the general public. Building upon this meme networks were bought out by conservative corporations, news operations were put under the entertainment divisions and the FCC stop requiring news broadcasting as a condition of licensing.
Ted Turner realized that the traditional network news had been reduced in size and homogenized into a rather unpalatable product. He founded CNN under the paradigm of a 24 hour network dedicated solely to examining the news. Following CNN was the entry of Rupert Murdoch and the “tabloidization” of Cable News along with FOX News becoming a propaganda provider for his Conservative views and allies. This was nothing new for Murdoch who bought out the New Post and the Village Voice, turning them both into neo-conservative propaganda operations, sensationalized with gossip and racy pictures. Sadly, in terms of return on investment, it was a winning strategy for cable news as FOX shot to the top of the ratings. CNN the former ratings leader faltered and tried to become “a little” more like Fox News in order to regain their stature. In the process they became a failure as a serious news provider and have become every bit as inane as shows like “Entertainment Tonight”, even in their coverage of “hard” news stories. At this time in our country’s history with so many serious problems that need to be dealt with, CNN has proven not only incapable, but uninterested in providing coverage of issues that affect us all and of which we the public require more information.
Today, as with many Americans who try to be informed, almost all of the “news” I pay attention to comes from the internet. While I occasionally will watch Rachel Maddow and MSNBC coverage of important events, their coverage too seems lacking of content or even intelligent analysis. There are exceptions at MSNBC when they go away from their usual pundit crew to have on original thinkers undaunted by the need to parrot the establishment. Indeed, the first time I became familiar with Jonathan Turley’s work was seeing him on MSNBC. Since this is the case I had to discover something about CNN’s recent coverage from two articles I read in the Huffington Post, one of which made me snort with amusement, while the other just made me shake my head in disgust as to the current state of CNN, as a representative of mainstream Cable News
The first item was from perhaps the “purest” form of cable news, John Stewart and the Daily Show. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/jon-stewart-calls-out-cnn-carnival-triumph-ship-coverage_n_2694347.html
“Jon Stewart opened Thursday’s “Daily Show” by calling out CNN for their exhaustive coverage of Triumph, the Carnival cruise ship that was stuck in the Gulf of Mexico for six days. Despite other perhaps more significant stories occurring simultaneously, CNN, which recently came under the leadership of Jeff Zucker, devoted their entire morning and afternoon broadcast on Thursday to following the story of the ship that had lost power and forced its passengers into disgusting conditions, such as defecating into bags.
“CNN has been on the case, for some reason giving this boat crisis wall-to-shit-covered-wall coverage,” Stewart opined, before rolling a clip of a CNN anchor showing a young girl on the ship waving to her mother via the TV cameras.
“You’re not heroes, guys,” Stewart said, referring to CNN. “It’s not a hostage situation or a baby in a well. You reconnected them? They weren’t supposed to see each other. They were on a cruise for a few days.”
Stewart lamented that the CNN coverage was at the expense of notably more important stories, such as the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation meeting in Cairo.”
The second Huffington Post Story added depth to the Daily Show comedy and clarified the Jeff Zucker that Stewart Referred to: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/14/cnn-cruise-ship-zucker_n_2687679.html
“Media watchers took notice on Thursday when CNN sent out a press release detailing its incredibly extensive coverage plans for the final leg of the journey of the Carnival Triumph cruise ship, which has been struck with power failures and squalid conditions for five days. The release made clear that CNN was going all in:
“CNN’s Erin Burnett will anchor “Erin Burnett OutFront” from Mobile, Alabama, where the ship will dock. Sandra Endo covers the ship’s arrival by helicopter; Victor Blackwell monitors by boat; and David Mattingly and Martin Savidge report from the dock in Mobile. CNN.com/live and the CNN apps will live stream the docking. CNN International will simulcast the arrival later tonight.On Saturday at 7:30pmET and 10:30pmET, CNN will broadcast “Cruise from Hell: Stranded at Sea,” a 30 minute special reported by Martin Savidge.”
“CNN wound up going beyond even that: during much of the late morning and early afternoon, there was literally no other story for the channel. Fox News talked about various matters, and MSNBC talked about the Chuck Hagel nomination and other political stories, but CNN had eyes only for the ship. The network devoted at least an hour of commercial-free coverage of its journey. The helicopter zoomed in and out, the correspondents reported from land and boat and studio, and the words “CNN Live Exclusive” were plastered in the top right hand corner of the screen the whole time.”
“It was not hard news, and it was not the most “important” story that CNN could have been covering. Jon Stewart will probably have a field day. But it was, if anyone needed it, a reminder that television news is still television — and it was very attention-grabbing. Substitute Matt Lauer for Banfield, and it could have easily been seen on “Today.” (The cruise ship was second only to the Oscar Pistorius murder allegations on that show’s Thursday edition.)Coincidentally (or not), “Today” happens to be where new CNN chief Jeff Zucker cut his teeth. Zucker has made clear that he wants to, in his words, “broaden the definition of news,”
The Today Show has been an NBC standard since the 50’s. It’s hosts through the years became TV lengends such as Dave Garroway, Barbara Walters and Hugh Downs. While it has always had a news content it was always really an entertainment show, with news content. As the years have progressed this had become truer and now with morning show competition the pressure to deliver light content has grown. Since these type of shows are cheaper to produce they have always been very profitable to the networks. Bringing Jeff Zucker in seems a clear sign to me that CNN will become even more of an entertainment network, pretending to provide serious news content. If the Zucker experiment is successful, how log will it be before the other cable news networks get the message and how much less informed will the America Public become?
As I said in the beginning though, I don’t generally watch cable news, but a viewing experience this week aroused ager and disdain, so when these “cruise ship” stories came up they caught my attention. Being in my late 60’s and having always been a political junkie, I’ve watched every State of the Union address that has ever been televised since 1965. Though they began televising the SOTU’s in 1947, in 1965 LBJ decided to make it a prime time affair. I probably watched some before that depending on where I was at the time. I believe that it is the duty of a citizen to watch the SOTU, no matter who is President, since its delivery is mandated constitutionally and thus serves as a common ritual. With the advent of cable news it has become traditional to have news programs concerned with the SOTU leading in to them and then analysis afterwards. When my wife and I sat down to watch on MSBC at 8:00pm, an hour before it was scheduled to begin, we were shocked to see a picture of a burning cabin in the woods. They were giving full on coverage of the Richard Dorner story and it seemed he had been surrounded in the woods. We had the expectation that this would entail bringing viewers up to date on this story and then become the usual background and analysis leading up to the SOTU. The time passed and not only did they stay with the story, but turned their coverage over to the local station that was covering the story. The problem was that like most “wrap around” news coverage we see on TV, think helicopters chasing OJ’s Bronco, there was little breaking news to cover and so we were treated to a constant rehashing of the known material, as each broadcaster seeking their moment of national fame, regurgitated essentially the same story.
Since two County Sheriff’s had been shot, we were treated to pictures of the hospital and the police guard keeping the media away. This continued on even though we knew that the status was that one officer was dead ad the other due to recover. I became increasingly frustrated as this coverage continued up until 3 minutes before the 9:00pm start. Tuning to the other news networks I saw the same coverage of the Dorner story.
The Dorner story indeed is one of interest. His murder spree and escape certainly merits attention, as doe the fact of his firing as a police officer, which he claimed was done to quiet his ratting out another officer’s improper conduct. However, perhaps some might think me insensitive to state that this story didn’t merit the coverage it was getting. It certainly pales in comparison to the SOTU speech, however one might feel about the President. The SOTU is the executive’s opportunity to lay out an agenda for the ext year. We are facing continued unemployment, a financial crisis and the continued deterioration of the infrastructure of this country. There are foreign policy issues that also are urgent and need to be discussed. It is horrible that Dorner murdered people, but such murders are really common place in this country, while there are urgent crises we face. We know the news maxim “if it bleeds, it leads” has too often been a ratings grabber.
This is the state of public affairs in this country as our newspapers fail and television journalism becomes an oxymoron. This coverage, leading up to the SOTU, was disrespectful of the traditions and rituals of this nation. We find this trivialization occurring consistently today and in truth it has been this way for years. We see a citizenry that is alienated from the concept of the American community and a good part of that is because those common rituals of our have been trivialized in the name of commerce. It is ironic to me when I as a Jew can understand Fundamentalist Christianity’s decrying the “War on Christmas”. Christmas in America has become yet another opportunity of commercialization, where presents and Santa subsume any meaning of what the holiday is supposed to be about. This is true though of our other Holidays as Thanksgiving has become football and Macy’s Day and as “President’s Day” has become the opportunity to have actors dressed as Lincoln and Washington offering “tremendous” deals on new cars. Sadly, the same traditionalists who decry these changes, fail to recognize that they are the accoutrements of a Corporate Plutocracy that will sell anything in pursuit of profit.
Which leads us back to the News and the need for a informed citizenry. I my opinion the American Empire has emulated Rome’s “bread and circuses” to keep the masses under control. The last vestige of a “Free Press” informing a “Free Citizenry” has fallen to the internet and to blogs such as ours. CNN to me stands for the “Clown News Network” just as FOX has become “Faux News”. MSNBC is not a news paradigm either, even though its political stance has some similarities to my own. I find them all stultifying and boring in content and structure. They all confuse the concept of journalism, with entertainment and therefore I damn them all.
Submitted by: Mike Spindell, guest blogger
The problem with news is the uninformed voters we end up with. How many people cared about our President having a kill list prior to the election? How many voters cared about the $ Billions given to bankers for their mistakes? How many voters can explain our “War on Terror”? And more importantly, why do we have a “war on terror”? So we re-elect a man that took GWBs terror policy and made it more terrifying. The one person running against him (oh wait, that’s right there were several other options but the “news” media gave them no air time), was a near perfect clone of GWB and BHO. So what choice did we have in the last election? The uninformed gave us a repeat performance.
We are getting exactly what we deserve.
My two cents,. FOX = Full Of Xhit..
Equally simple: MSNBC = Moronic Stupid Numbskull Broadcast Communications. Always has been; always will be.
CNN and MSMBC know their markets well.
It’s simple: CNN = Communist News Network. It’s called an axiom. Always has been; always will be.
“But you won’t find Erin Burnett asking questions like those.”
BFM,
Erin enjoys the money she makes and her celebrity. Questions like that might put all of that in jeopardy.
TDLR,
A very mediocre attempt at irony.
“CNN’s Erin Burnett will anchor “Erin Burnett OutFront”
Erin Burnett is the one who counts off the days since the credit rating of US government securities was reduced and poses the question ‘what are we doing to get it back’.
It would seem that even the dimmest journalist would note that interest rates on US securities are the lowest in generations. In fact some real interest rates are negative which means the smart guys with bit bucks are paying to store their money is US government securities. (real interest rates are the difference between nominal interest rates and inflation)
This directly contradicts the idea that there is a problem with the credit worthiness of US securities.
The real question is what are the Credit Rating Agencies doing to get their own credibility back. Obviously they do not have a clue regarding the credit worthiness of US government securities.
Another interesting question is why DOJ is taking credit rating agencies to court. What role did the Credit Rating Agencies play in the recent financial crisis?
Another interesting question has to do with the obvious conflict of interest the credit rating agencies have with the corporate securities they rate.
But you won’t find Erin Burnett asking questions like those.
Highway to hell on the autobahn……for sure…l
TLDR: I am so far left that I consider CNN to be Fox News Lite. I know this even though I only watch Maddow on MSNBC. Instead of covering tabloid stories like the fate of thousands of cruise ship passengers, a true news outlet would continuously run excerpts from our Dear Leader’s SOTU address. In fact, this should be mandated by the FCC.
So you’re mad that MSNBC didn’t cut away from an ongoing firefight to broadcast a room full of political hacks schmoozing around in preparation for a “speech” (read: political stunt) the text of which is released hours before it’s given?
Can’t stand MSM! Barely tolerate CNN! Watch mainly Fox! But I love News Hour on PBS!
FWIWI:
n the evening I watch local news for weather and local sports. I take the local paper every Sunday for that week’s community events (and coupons)
Each morning i view, in order, the local paper, this blog, Think Progress and a couple of work related blogs. In the evening its various HuffPo sections and their nay links. If time permits, TED
At least every other day I check out the following daiies:
*http://www.aljazeera.com/
*http://www.democracynow.org/
*http://www.reuters.com/
*http://www.thedailybeast.com/
About once a week (usually weekends), I hit these and a boatload of activist sites
*http://www.economist.com/
*http://www.motherjones.com/
*http://www.thenation.com/
I also have favorite lists of news/information sites for specific topics, the largest by far pertain to food issues, gardening (including aquaponics), and being green. I also monitor certain “newsy” YouTube sites.
What are some of y’all’s (two apostrephes!) favorite news sites?
“Up with Chris Hayes” is a good panel discussion…… usually has some known names plus some relatively unknown younger bloggers.
“Here in San Diego, there was a local independent station[KUSI] that stayed w/ the Dorner coverage when the local network stations went to the SOTU.”
I have no doubt that some local California stations stayed with Dorner and didn’t broadcast the SOTU and moreover that is irrelevant to me. I questioned all major cable networks on a national basis, airing this local story prior to the SOTU.
“It is judgemental to question what type of news people consume. There are choices people make and I say, “To each their own”,”
There is nothing wrong with being judgmental as long as one maintains an open mind and if one can provide cogent arguments for their judgments.
“We certainly do not have the right to demand that they follow our wishes (nor do we have the right to legislate their programing).”
Mr. Fleisher,
I find much too agree with in your comment above, but I do need to correct one impression of yours. I decry CNN and its business model as misrepresenting what is news. However, I would oppose any legislation that would curtail their right of free speech. The purpose of my blog was ot a call for any sort of governmental action, it was merely to expose the failure of the mainstream media, upon which I trust we both agree.
Mike,
I agree that the MSM news outlets are fixated on entertainment, more than news. I do think that you can get some decent political analysis on MSNBC, especially from Rachel Maddow who you mention in your article. I do not see any change for the better on the horizon. The dumbing down of our society is in full swing and the only possible savior for that is the internet. No surpirse that the media moguls are trying to limit and control the internet as well. Great job.
Mr. Spindell:
Everything that you have said about the media is true, however I beg to differ in one regard.
We have viable alternatives.
You and I probably disagree on a lot, but your message reaches me. My choice whether I read it or not. Your choice whether you read my response or not, but I have a chance to respond on your site – the ultimate in fairness.
While I don’t like the MSM (and worse, I think that they are failing us), Americans have enough alternative sources that we are well served on the information front.
In your example, CNN has chosen a certain business model. Their choice, not ours. We have the option of going elsewhere. We certainly do not have the right to demand that they follow our wishes (nor do we have the right to legislate their programing).
If a citizen fails to avail himself of resources, that is his problem; he has the right to be a boob. The risks that arise when somebody else sets the programing are obvious.
Here in San Diego, there was a local independent station[KUSI] that stayed w/ the Dorner coverage when the local network stations went to the SOTU. The independent stations ratings went up by 30% during that time slot. This was a local story that had gone national. It is judgemental to question what type of news people consume. There are choices people make and I say, “To each their own”, my mother’s wise words spoken in situations like this.
I stopped watching CNN when Judy Woodruff left in 2005.
Mike,
I read a story with a video indicating that a CNN anchor asked Bill Nye if the Asteroid that just missed us was caused by global warming.
I wonder if they would have allowed the following ad, which Oil-Qaeda bullied another network from running (Huffington Post)