The Myth of Black Freedom in the U.S.

Submitted by: Mike Spindell, guest blogger

417px-Frederick_Douglass_portraitTo some of us the transition from slave to citizenship by those Africans brought in chains to these shores for economic exploitation and horrific abuse ended with the “Emancipation Proclamation”. To others its’ end might have been marked by “Brown v. Board of Education”, or by the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Those of somewhat more insightful bent may have said that the true emancipation occurred when Barack Obama was elected President in 2008. In my view, as much of an impact as all those milestones (and more such as Jackie Robinson i.e.) made to American consciousness, Black people in the United States clearly still lack the benefits and rewards of citizenship. I would go further and say that in the United States, at this time; most Black people still suffer the degradation and challenges brought about by both institutional and emotional racism. This is not to say that in our country other groups, such as Latino’s and Native Americans are free of oppressive prejudice, but to assert that given their history in this country Black people are slotted into the bottom of the economic and social ladder and are still struggling to obtain even those most minimal of rights that most Americans see as their birthright.

This article is a very personal one for me, even though I am not a Black American. As someone born in 1944 I have lived through a great deal of significant Civil Rights history and even contributed to the struggle albeit in a minor way. As a Jewish kid from New York, born into a progressive family, my experience with Black people was minimal until the age of eighteen. There were no non-Whites in my High School, for instance. Yet as someone from a large family, where both set of grandparents immigrated to this country, we as Jews were quite aware of the Country’s innate prejudice towards ourselves and many of us translated that awareness into understanding the prejudicial plights of other ethnic groups. In America though, even among Jews, as each new wave of immigrants found success and acceptance many among them viewed Blacks with disdain believing something to the effect of “If I and mine “made” it, why can’t they. What’s wrong with them? The following will be my personal explanation for “what’s wrong with them” and to me the inevitable conclusion will be what’s wrong with us, the US being this country.

The first African slaves were brought to Virginia in 1619. As the centuries passed this was seen by those profiting from it as a fortuitous economic innovation. Pre-Revolutionary American also had another longstanding, economically exploitive and fortuitous use of lowering labor costs known as indentured servitude. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude  European immigrants sign a legal document committing them to a certain term of service as “servants”, during which time they received no pay, only food and lodging. They could be discipline through beatings and their contracts were fully enforceable by law. The practice began to die out with the proliferation of African slaves, since the Blacks had a lifetime obligation of service which ended at death, they were economically more feasible a solution. With history memory fades quickly, especially if a whole cottage industry of media propaganda has been produced to “smooth” its edges. “Birth of a Nation”, one of the most cinematically acclaimed films of all time, present Blacks as rabid sub-humans, who required a heroic Ku Klux Klan to keep them in line after the Emancipation. “Gone with the Wind” an even more financially successful film portrays the Blacks in it as sort of loyal simpletons who wouldn’t know how to exist without white people to give them guidance. Racist, denigrating portrayals of Blacks ran rife through the American Cinema and indeed the arts. Stereotypes become universal mythological archetypes and even many of those who believed in freedom for Blacks were skeptical of their capabilities for acting as average citizens.

Looking back at the history of Black slavery in America, I believe we need to re-emphasize an aspect of it that though well known, is usually given intellectually short shrift as to its long term effects. Genocide comes in many forms. Given Twentieth Century history genocide connotes outright murder such as those committed by the Turks against the Armenians, the NAZI’s against the Jews, homosexuals, Gypsy’s and mentally incapacitated. We can add Stalin’s “agricultural reform” via murder, Pol Pot’s political purification via the “killing fields” and the various tragic genocides taking place in Africa today. Yet in that past Century we have another example of a less murderous, but no less horrific genocide as exhibited by Mao’s “Cultural Revolution”. This was an effort less to murder people and more to provide them with a harshly imposed re-education and as such I see the “Genocide” of American slavery as a pre-cursor of Chairman Mao.

Except for instances of sadism, or extreme disciplinary example, it was not the intent of the American slaveholder to murder his/her slaves. They represented property and wealth. They could be put up as chattel for loans and they could be sold for profit. The “smart” slave investor wanted to keep his “property” healthful and in good shape for possible profit via sale. What that investor, entrepreneur may we say, didn’t want was any particular slave believing that they had the right to do anything but serve the will of their Master. Cultural genocide was what was imposed upon the captive Africans, to destroy any memories of their past history and to dent them the normal human comforts of wives and family. The truth, conveniently ignored by common history books to sugar coat the horror of imperialist exploitation of Africa, was that existing there was rather strong and sophisticated cultural heritages. These were not “savages” falling upon each other in constant strife and living unsophisticated lives as “jungle denizens”, but rather richly developed cultures that had a sophisticated cross-cultural interdependence. That some of the more powerful tribes sold their fellows into slavery was not a good thing, but actually slavery in the Western world’s history goes back to our “cultural forebears” the Athenians, the Trojans, the Carthaginians and of course the “glory” that was Rome. Human’s tendency to exploit other humans for personal gain seems endemic to our history as we see today in our “great banks”, or phony entrepreneurs like Mitt Romney.

Slaveholders in America needed to ensure docility by expunging the African memories and identities of “their” slaves by renaming them, destroying personal bonds such as marriage and parenthood, and most importantly teaching their unwilling slaves that all the stereotypes of their inferiority were true. They succeeded fairly well in many cases. I could put in here the actual truth that the slaves were highly resistant and developed their own intellectual and cultural movements, including many rebellions, but if you don’t know of the lives of Frederick Douglas  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Douglass  and Nat Turner http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_Turner it might profit you to do a little research. Nevertheless, the slave holder propagandists did have widespread success in their genocide of cultural destruction, abetted by the mass media and certain historians forgetfulness of the true history of American slavery.

The “Abolitionist Movement” in America gained strength to the point of electing an American President who shared somewhat similar sentiments. One of the bloodiest wars in history was fought on American soil and in the end the forces of Abolition seemed victorious. Lincoln was of course murdered only days after the Gettysburg surrender and replaced by a somewhat less committed and capable President Andrew Johnson. While the plans for “Reconstruction” had been drawn prior to the Civil Wars end, Johnson’s ability to fully implement it and truly give freed Blacks the chance at full citizenship and freedom was limited by the deal he had to make to keep from being impeached. Slavery was over but “Jim Crow” replaced it with a system no less harsh and certainly no less murderous. Historically and in the doctrines of our courts “Jim Crow” was the law of the land and Black people were for the most part not allowed the normal rights of American citizens, most importantly the right to vote.

What is forgotten in all of this is the psychological effect this condition of “Jim Crow” had upon Black Americans, particularly males. Imagine living a life where you are not only constantly under suspicion for mischief, but extremely likely to be incarcerated or lynched for innocent actions? Imagine having to step into the gutter when encountering a white person on the sidewalk? Imagine being afraid to look a white person in the eye for fear of being charged with the “crime” of being “uppity”. Imagine being educated in severely under funded school districts, with poverty the impetus to drop out early to work and with lack of books to help one in their study? Imagine having to take a “literacy” test to vote, or having to pay a “poll tax” in order to vote? Imagine seeing angry policeman staring at you as you approached a polling place and knowing that they could beat you senseless just for the fun of it? Imagine being called “Boy” by someone years younger and your life in danger if you don’t acquiesce?

Imagine as a father being unable to find, or hold a job as easy as your wife and the shameful baggage that goes with the knowledge you are unable to support your family? Imagine needing welfare assistance for your family to survive, yet having to either move out of your home, or pretend not to live there lest the Welfare authorities cut off your family’s entire assistance? Imagine living a life of having to suffer constant humiliation and degradation of your self-esteem? What I’ve just written only briefly touches upon the psychological genocide that was inflicted and still is being afflicted upon the Black portion of our people.

That so many Black people have thrived, despite all of these difficulties, is a tribute to the intelligence and talents of this portion of our population. That such a rich cultural heritage has been produced by Black Americans is a similar paean to the strength of their culture and to the many examples of true genius that exists amongst them. So yes in America we have a Black President, many distinguished Black legislators, educators, entertainers and sports stars. I would assert to you that while on an individual basis that is a cause for celebration, on an institutional basis things have not really progressed much beyond “Jim Crow” and we may actually be entering a time of retrenchment if we don’t see the ominous signs.

Last week my fellow guest blogger Lawrence Rafferty made this excellent contribution: “Probable Cause..Black, Latino and Young”. http://jonathanturley.org/2013/03/24/probable-cause-black-latino-and-young/#more-62063  In it he discussed the ongoing New York City “Stop and Frisk” policy instituted by Mayor Bloomberg and his Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. While the trial isn’t over the evidence is pretty conclusive that for the past decade people of color have been targeted by the NYPD simply based on their appearance:

“According to department data, the NYPD has made roughly 5 million street stops in the past decade, the vast majority of those stopped being young African American or Latino men.  Nearly nine out of 10 of those stopped by police have walked away without a summons or arrest.” 

Explain to me please the difference between these actions and those Blacks lived through during “Jim Crow”? Now due to his media savvy I have no doubt that Mr. Bloomberg, that champion of the elite, has publicized this to the point where we think it is simply a New York City phenomenon. In truth this is common practice all over this country and especially in places like Los Angeles, San Diego and Joe Arpaio’s famed Maricopa Country. Indeed in all of Arizona one can be stopped for driving as a suspected Mexican. Seriously, can you deny that in the “formerly Jim Crow” South this is still not a common practice?

A companion piece to this is something that I have previously written about: “The Incarceration of Black Men in Americahttp://jonathanturley.org/?s=The+incarceration+of+black+men+in+america

 To quote from that piece:

“Black males continue to be incarcerated at an extraordinary rate. Black males make up 35.4 percent of the jail and prison population — even though they make up less than 10 percent of the overall U.S population. Four percent of U.S. black males were in jail or prison last year, compared to 1.7 percent of Hispanic males and .7 percent of white males. In other words, black males were locked up at almost six times the rate of their white counterparts.”      

http://www.laprogressive.com/law-and-the-justice-system/boiling-hot-mad/.html

How can we honestly say given the above, if you accept it, that Black people share equality of citizenship with their fellow Americans? The “stop and frisk” actions lead to predominantly minor charges, that despite guilt are plea bargained away due to lack of viable legal representation. Arrests and jail records make finding gainful employment harder, which leads to a kind of “what the hell” despair that imbues the psyches of may Blacks, despite their intelligence, strength of character and the stability of their communal connections. We still live in a land of “Jim Crow” and those who pretend we do not are either politically and/or racially motivated, or suffering from denial in my opinion. To any who might dispute my conclusions, or think they are based upon lack of evidence beware, because the evidence of this fact is so overwhelming that this guest blog would run into the tens of thousands of words were I to produce them. Until all of our citizens, despite their backgrounds are treated on an equal basis than the idea of our Constitutional Republic is a mere sham. It must seem so for so many people of color.

Submitted by: Mike Spindell, guest blogger.

98 thoughts on “The Myth of Black Freedom in the U.S.”

  1. In his book, ‘Breaking The Chains of Psychological Slavery (1996),’ Dr. Na’im Akbar states:

    “Slavery was so destructive to natural life processes that the current generation of African-Americans still carry the scars of this experience in both our social and mental lives.”

    Dr. Akbar provides an illustration of this phenomenon in certain African-American’s distorted attitude towards work:

    “Slavery was forced labor. The work was not for the purpose of providing for his (slave’s) life’s needs. Instead, he worked to produce for the slave master. He would neither profit from his labor nor enjoy the benefits of labor.”

    According to Akbar, “work, in a natural society, is looked upon with pride, both because it permits persons to express themselves and because it supplies their survival needs. During slavery, work was used as a punishment. Work came to be despised as any punishment is despised. Work became hated, as does any activity, which causes suffering and brings no reward for the doer. Work became equated with slavery. Even today, the African-American slang expression, which refers to a job as a ‘slave’ communicates this painful connection.”

    “Many African-Americans have developed a variety of habits to avoid work, such as reliance upon gambling, and other get-rich-quick schemes.”

    Furthermore, according to Akbar, “there are some African-Americans who become over-dependent on welfare as a way of life because of this ‘work phobia.’

    Finally, Akbar concludes: “It is important for African-Americans to know that many of our attitudes toward work are a result of our slavery experiences. These negative experiences associated with work continue to function as unconscious influences on us that make us respond in ways, which may be contrary to our conscious intention. Awareness of these influences and their source begins to free us from their effects. Our slang, our songs, our jokes, our attitudes, transmitted from one generation to the next, preserve these reactions as if they were acquired yesterday.”

  2. I have found anecdotes useful in illustrating scientific findings. It is often easier than trying to explain dry statistics to a jury or anyone else. But an anecdote is not useful as a finding of fact. For any single study to have any statistical usefulness at all, a sample of at least thirty is needed.

    However, Bron is correct that many studies begin with hearing of anecdote or folklore. For example that a certain plant will treat a disease. That is how many investigations begin. Sometimes it pans out into something useful and sometimes not. But as Gene says, a sample of one is not proof of anything.

  3. Bron, He is quite apolitical, like MANY people. It would shock folks here to know that there are many independent people, even though statitistics show that to be the fact vis a vis voting. I know he voted for Obama the first time. I don’t know how he voted this last election, or if he even voted. Regarding local elections, I don’t know. He is fiscally conservative and understands govt. is not the panacea so many think. He is socially fairly liberal but has a real problem w/ gays, as do many black men. He’s funny as hell, except when he gets in touch w/ his dark side. We ALL have a dark side, that’s how I made a living.

  4. Bron,

    And if that’s where you end it, the other scientists will laugh at you. That is why science places a premium on statistical analysis of empirically gathered data.

  5. hypothetically:

    I am a scientist and I go down to South America and I am looking for medicinal plants and animals. Anecdotal evidence is how I start my investigation.

  6. What you have is a statement of fact about the value of anecdote as valid evidence and how such evidence is weighted in both scientific and legal analysis which is, in a word, lightly if at all.

  7. nick:

    is your friend, the one who messes with whites, is he liberal or conservative or libertarian?

  8. Bron, I understood that. I’ve learned to read those emoticons.

    While I always love it when folks are didactic, giving me a defintion of “anecdote”, the issue is that it is alleged the anecdotes are false, some of them?, all of them?, has yet to be stated. Just a vague accusation is all we have @ this point.

  9. Anecdotal evidence is unreliable even if the specific anecdote is true. Due to its poor quality, it is unreliable as a foundation for logic or argument (both scientifically and legally) but especially when trying to describe something as being “typical” – which requires statistical evidence. Having many anecdotes does not mean that any or even a statistically significant number of them are true. Nor does having a lot of them automatically equate to them being “fascinating” much less the speaker.

  10. nick:

    I was just joking around, I assume everyone is telling the truth until I know for a fact they arent.

  11. We dogs in our dogpac here think that we are not prejudiced. Then those little chiwowwows come round and bark us to death.

  12. What do folks here think of Charles Barkley having Gottlieb’s back for his innocuous, “White man perspective” comment. Barkley must be a “Tom”, right?

  13. Bron, I don’t even know what I’ve said is “possibly false.” It’s liberal McCarthyism. “I have in my hands, 4 possibly false anecdotes.” Telling someone who has testified under oath hundreds of times that they’re lying is a challenge I welcome. The fact that I am an engaging person who has lived a fascinating life and have MANY anecdotes is obviously a threat to insular people. It doesn’t compute for them.

  14. lottakatz

    If you get on airplane and a few Middle Eastern men get on, do you think some passengers get alarmed? Of course! That is a normal reaction after 9-11. It will take time for People to rid themselves of that stereotypical behavior. The same is true for both White and Black. Many of my Black Brothers get alarmed when they see “White” People and I amsure it is the same on the other side. What we need to do is stop blaming one race or another and simply be Americans.

  15. mespo:

    when that check from Nick clears, send me $500 and keep the rest for yourself. 🙂

  16. Elaine:

    all races are racist if that is what you want to call it. It isnt only white people. Sometimes I think it is just that fish school with other fish of the same species.

    I used to eat with a half dozen Chinese students from Taiwan when I was in college, they used to tell me that all Americans looked alike and they werent kidding and they made a few other statements which could be considered racist. I have a friend from India who made a very racist remark in a moment of candor.

    All people should lay their predjudices aside and take each person as an individual and not as a member of a particular race or culture.

Comments are closed.