Ancient Mayan Pyramid Destroyed For Gravel In Belize

250px-First_Tractor_Company_-_old_working_model_-_01220px-Maya_Presentation_of_Captives_detail_2_KimbellIn a true crime against culture, a construction company in Belize City has destroyed one of Belize’s largest Mayan pyramids to use it for gravel for road fill. Archeologists and locals say that there is no way that the company officials were unaware of the historical meaning of the pyramid when they took backhoes and bulldozers to it. Before they succeeded in eradicating the structure, locals took pictures showing the center of the pyramid still standing with a Mayan room exposed at the top.

Noh Mul (or Nohmul) is a pre-Columbian Maya site that was constructed before the 5th Century. It was considered unique and unusual for Mayan construction. Nohmul means “great mound” in (Yucatec) Maya.

John Morris, an archaeologist with the Institute of Archaeology, told’s Jules Vasquez. “We can’t salvage what has happened out here — it’s an incredible display of ignorance. I am appalled and don’t know what to say at this particular moment.”

Jaime Awe, director of the Institute of Archaeology, expressed disgust at the scene and said that the pyramid could not be salvaged. While the Noh Mul complex sits on private land, Belizean law places any pre-Hispanic ruins under government protection.

The heavy equipment at the site belongs to D-Mar Construction. When confronted, Denny Grijalva, owner of the company, insisted that he knew nothing about the project.

Such a crime does incalculable damage to not just Belize but the world. Unfortunately, such crimes tend to be treated lightly in many countries in sentencing. Notably, according to experts, bulldozing Mayan sites for gravel is a common practice in Belize. That would indicate that criminal penalties were demonstrably too low for deterrence since detection would seem relatively high in such cases.

19 thoughts on “Ancient Mayan Pyramid Destroyed For Gravel In Belize”

  1. Darren:

    there may be a shortage of stone in Belize depending on geology. Nope, there is a stone quarry in northern Belize probably close to where the temple was destroyed.

    18°7’46″N 88°41’8″W

  2. There must be a shortage of rocks in the world. I suggesting checking inside the heads of these construction guys first.

  3. Bron, I agree, you just described my 30 years owning my own biz. I don’t see the conflict. I believe the vast majority of people who succeed in business are honest, hardworking and intelligent. In my line of work you will not last 2 years if you don’t produce, and that’s the way most professions work. Many who scoff @ business only know what they read in books.

  4. Respect for important sites is a world-wide problem.

    China destroys the ancient Buddhist symbols of Lhasa City in Tibet
    Thursday, 09 May 2013 13:00 Yeshe Choesang, The Tibet Post International

    Lhasa-Tibet-2013-323Dharamshala: – – Ignoring both religious freedom and the outcry of the Tibetan people, the Chinese authorities have begun demolishing the ancient capital of Lhasa, including one of the most important Buddhist sites of the city, Tibet’s holiest Jokhang Temple.

    Chinese authorities are planning to destroy the ancient Buddhist capital of Lhasa, and replace it with a tourist city similar to Lijiang. “Shangri-La” in Yunnan Province. Several large-scale construction projects are underway for a number of shopping malls around the Buddhist holy temple as well as underground parking at Barkhor Street.

    “Traditional Tibetan buildings in this ancient city are once again facing the destruction crisis under Chinese modernization”, well-known Tibetan writer Woeser told the RFA Mandarin section. She is also appealing to the global institutions, including UNESCO and Tibetans around the world to ‘save Lhasa.’

    Woeser, who is currently living in Beijing, has published an article on her blog-page (Sunday, May 5) with pictures of the ongoing construction in the ancient city of Lhasa. She has called for a global intervention in the serious situation in the city, where thousand year-old traditional buildings are being destroying by the Chinese in the name of modernization and social stability.

    ‘The construction project in the areas of Barkor streets of the Jokhang temple covers an area of 150,000 square meters to use as new shopping malls and 1,117 square meters for the underground parking spaces”, said the sources.

    Woeser said many recent visitors already raised strong concerns over the constructions as well as the fate of Lhasa. She expressed her concern over the Chinese authorities’ activities and condemned them for demolishing the ancient symbols of Tibetan civilization.

    She alludes to photos of the ongoing constructions that she has received, “The photos reflect the situation in the old town of Lhasa, it is a serious matter of concern.”

    Woeser claims that this is an unlawful act, aiming directly at multiple targets. There is an old Tibetan saying: ‘One stone for two birds’, which springs to mind.

    She said its not only just for economic development, there are other targets. If we look carefully at the photos of the shopping mall project, there are several requirements for alterations of the Tibetan old city, including one called ‘evacuation’. This means clearing vendors from the Barkhor streets, perhaps better named ‘destruction.’

    The Tibetan writer said China was criticized after converting the two ancient Chinese cities; Lijiang in Yunnan and Hunan city into modern tourist cities, with both projects now widely seen as poor decisions.

    In fact, such reconstruction has already occurred in Tibet. China now wants the Tibetan Autonomous Region to become like the Zhongdian City (Tibetan: Gyalthang county of eastern Tibet). After the reconstruction, Lijiang was changed to “Shangri-La”, mainly to attract tourists. She said this kind of destruction has caused great damage and should be considered ‘tourist colonialism’.

    Previous experiences from the so-called economic development of Gyalthang County, which caused the disappearance of many Tibetan cultural symbols, including the disappearance of the customs and cultural heritage of the Tibetan people is the “most worrying matter of concern.”

    The Chinese government is also set to expand various so-called ‘interests’, including governmental and economic measures, regardless of the consequences. The regime is seeking to further “maintenance in social stability”, meaning the authorities have significantly increased surveillance and monitoring in the region, particularly in Lhasa city, prompting an escalation of security measures.

    The Potala Palace was added to the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1994. In 2000 and 2001, Jokhang Temple and Norbulingka were added to the list as extensions to the sites. Rapid modernization has been a concern for UNESCO, however, which expressed concern over the building of modern structures immediately around the palace, which threaten the palace’s unique atmosphere.

    The Chinese government responded by enacting a rule barring the building of any structure taller than 21 meters in the area. However, sources stated that there are new modern buildings higher than 21 meters to be found in the vicinity. Woeser further stated that Jokhang Temple in Lhasa City should be granted protected status under UNESCO’s cultural heritage regulations.

    UNESCO was also concerned over the materials used during the restoration of the palace, which commenced in 2002 at a cost in millions of dollars, although the Chinese authorities have promised that only traditional materials and craftsmanship were used.

  5. nick:

    you must hang out with better people than I do. Many people I know, especially the ones who have small businesses, are in business from sheer determination and hardwork.

  6. One man’s most is another man’s some. It’s all a ratio of the whole.

  7. I don’t believe most people in business succeed in spite of themselves. If you replace “most” w/ “some”, I’ll buy it.

  8. Bron,

    Amen. As my dad likes to say, “Most people in business succeed in spite of themselves.” :mrgreen:

  9. Gene H:

    The number of poorly run companies in this country is evidence to support your contention. I am in no way implying capitalism is immune to stupid acts and actors.

  10. Bron,

    You speak as if capitalism and stupidity are mutually exclusive when it’s abundantly clear from historical examples that is simply not so. Or as Einstein once said, “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.”

  11. Gene H:

    no, that isnt capitalism that is rank stupidity. If I owned a Mayan pyramid, I would sell tickets for people to come and see it. Worth far more that way than as a gravel road.

    I would also sacrifice one virgin daily at noon for an added spectacle. of course the heart would be a pig heart stimulated with electricity and no maidens would be harmed.

    In addition I would sell Mayan “artifacts” made in China or by locals and have Mayan drinks and food for sale by locals dressed as Mayan Royalty.

    Now that is capitalism, making gravel out of an asset like that is sheer stupidity.

  12. They say you can’t make gravel without grave. Throw another mummy on the fire and forget about our cultural heritage! It’s capitalism on the march.

    I usually don’t weep for our species until after I’ve had my first cup of coffee.

Comments are closed.