Submitted by: Mike Spindell, Guest Blogger
When I started as a college student about 50 years ago I took the Sociology I course as a required subject. There is little I remember from that course and less I remember about the instructor, except for his introductory words on the first day of class. To paraphrase him he said: “You will be taking a lot of courses in what are called the Social Sciences. Approach them all, including mine, with skepticism because they really aren’t science courses like those you’ve learned as a high school student. They will spend a lot of lecture time though trying to prove they are truly scientific, don’t believe them”. His clear meaning was that although the Social Sciences try to operate as if they are using the scientific method of experiments/research to prove theories, most of the work done is skewed to prove the theory of choice by those doing the research. In the five decades since that lecture my own experience and reading has taught me how true the advice from that long forgotten Sociology instructor is.
The social science that has my attention at the moment is Economics. I’ve read many an economist, from all points on the political spectrum and frankly while I favor those such as Krugman and Baker, I take most of what they say as opinion, rather than scientifically determined truth. Yes I’ve even read “Freakonomics” by Levitt and Dubner and the follow-up “Superfreakonomics” and while they were good reads I see them as not only bad science, but a conflation of economics with other social sciences that is superficial at best. This is really the problem with many economists and their theories. They presume to divine human behavior via the prism of economic theory. In the end their proofs are merely retrofitting their pre-judgments. That brings me to the “Austerity” movement which has hampered the recovery from the economic “depression” brought on by the wars and tax reductions of the Bush years, while it has also caused a crisis worldwide through its imposition upon many nations. The foundation research that has justified this “Austerity” movement came from two Harvard Professors: Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff. A University of Massachusetts student Thomas Herndon found that their work was filled with mathematical errors in their research spreadsheets. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/reinhart-rogoff-austerity-research-errors_n_3094015.html Their spreadsheets were their “proofs” that economic austerity promotes economic recovery and this theory, long held by many economists, is the basis for the imposition of austerity onto so many Nation’s economies and is the source of bitter national debate in our own. Though I will present some overview and links amplifying “austerity’s” false assumptions, my interest is in presenting my view on why the powers that be have imposed this doctrine, whose effects fall squarely upon 99% of the people of these nations, leaving the wealthiest unscathed.
Thomas Herndon with others published a paper about Reinhart/Rogoff’s findings stating this:
“ The new paper, by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, and Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, set out to reconstruct the findings of an influential 2010 paper by Reinhart and Rogoff, called “Growth In A Time Of Debt.” Reinhart and Rogoff, both of Harvard, claimed that economic growth slowed fairly dramatically for countries whose public debt crossed a threshold of 90 percent of gross domestic product.
The problem is that other economists have been unable to recreate Reinhart and Rogoff’s findings. Herndon, Ash and Pollin now say they were able to do so — but only by leaving out big, important pieces of data.
Using the same spreadsheet that Reinhart and Rogoff used for their research, Herndon, Ash and Pollin found that “Growth In A Time Of Debt” was built around a handful of significant errors. Correcting for those errors changes the findings dramatically: Average GDP growth for high-debt countries jumps from negative 0.1 percent to 2.2 percent.”
What we see then is that calculation “errors” showed that GDP growth for high debt countries actual increased rather than decreased. Reinhart and Rogoff (R&R) have been arguing that debt decreases GDP as the rationale for austerity and their argument seems not only unproven, but wrong. It gets worse.
The Harvard economists have argued that mistakes and omissions in their influential research on debt and economic growth don’t change their ultimate austerity-justifying conclusion: That too much debt hurts growth.But even this claim has now been disproved by two new studies, which suggest the opposite might in fact be true: Slow growth leads to higher debt, not the other way around.
In a post at Quartz, University of Michigan economics professor Miles Kimball and University of Michigan undergraduate student Yichuan Wang write that they have crunched Reinhart and Rogoff’s data and found “not even a shred of evidence” that high debt levels lead to slower economic growth. And a new paper by University of Massachusetts professor Arindrajit Dube finds evidence that Reinhart and Rogoff had the relationship between growth and debt backwards: Slow growth appears to cause higher debt, if anything.
As you can see from the chart from Dube’s paper below, growth tends to be slower in the five years before countries have high debt levels. In the five years after they have high debt levels, there is no noticeable difference in growth at all, certainly not at the 90 percent debt-to-GDP level that Reinhart and Rogoff’s 2010 paper made infamous. Kimball and Wang present similar findings in their Quartz piece.
This contradicts the conclusion of Reinhart and Rogoff’s 2010 paper, “Growth in a Time of Debt,” which has been used to justify austerity programs around the world. In that paper, and in many other papers, op-ed pieces and congressional testimony over the years, Reinhart And Rogoff have warned that high debt slows down growth, making it a huge problem to be dealt with immediately. The human costs of this error have been enormous.
Even after University of Massachusetts graduate student Thomas Herndon found Reinhart and Rogoff’s work included errors and that their 2010 paper was missing important data, the researchers stood by their ultimate conclusion: that growth dropped off significantly after debt hit 90 percent of GDP. They claimed that austerity opponents like Paul Krugman have been so so rude to them for no good reason.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/reinhart-rogoff-debunked_n_3361299.html
What is so infuriating about R&R is the destruction that follows in the wake of there now debunked theories. The unemployment in Europe is has reached record high levels high levels, countries like Greece and Spain have rioting in the streets and a new neo Nazi movement is gaining popularity throughout Europe. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/31/eurozone-unemployment-record-high_n_3364881.html The cost in human suffering is incalculable, but these fatuous academic asses are not concerned with people, they are concerned with their reputations and they are concerned with catering to wealth. Their theories, rather than being the result of real research and experiment, are in effect self-fulfilling prophecies. This is NOT science; it is overweening egotism in tandem with uncaring self interest. This tale, however, gets worse. Huffington Pos contributor: Mark Gongloff wrote this article on Friday: “Austerity Fanatics Won’t Let Mere Economics Stop Them From Thinking They’re Winning” in it he writes:
“Like Hiroo Onoda, the Japanese soldier who hid on an island in the Philippines for 30 years refusing to believe Japan had lost World War II, austerity fanatics are never going to admit their failure. Instead, they are going to keep pushing the policies that are making millions of people in Europe and the United States miserable.
The latest example of their denial is a piece by Michael Rosen of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, entitled “Austerity And Its Discontents.” He declares that, far from being shamed by the recent discovery of errors in influential research by Harvard economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, austerity fans have recently gained “the upper hand” in the global argument over austerity.
Rosen argues that Reinhart and Rogoff’s many loud rebuttals to their critics helped give austerians the “intellectual high ground.” He ignores that, in fact, Reinhart and Rogoff’s rebuttals have only compounded their errors. He also ignores that further research has debunked Reinhart and Rogoff utterly, revealing that their biggest mistake was in confusing the cause-effect relationship between high debt and growth. It turns out, contra Reinhart and Rogoff, that there is no evidence that high debt causes slow growth — in fact, the opposite might be true.
But then the austerians have never really needed the intellectual high ground. Their phobia of government debt is based mainly on the idea that debt is just bad because of course it has to be. It is bad when people take on a lot of debt, ipso facto the same thing is bad for government. We must eat our spinach, not our dessert!
Rosen is absolutely right when he points out that Germany, and the American Enterprise Institute, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page, and Michael Kinsley, and the many, many other long-time fans of austerity have only redoubled their efforts to push austerity measures in the wake of the Reinhart-Rogoff debunking and re-debunking. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/31/austerity-failure-fanatics_n_3367787.html?ref=topbar
Now that I’ve presented the situation to you at least from my side of the fence, you can make up your minds about austerity. While I agree with many of the conclusions delivered by the writers quoted above my slant on it all is somewhat different. I believe that all economic theories and political theories, despite their validity, mask what is truly going on in our world today. It is easy of course to compare the call for austerity by conservatives under Democrats and the out of control spending and debt run up in the Reagan, Bush I and Bush II administrations. This comparison would lead one to believe there is fiscal hypocrisy at the bottom of this and that is true. However, the fiscal hypocrisy exist as much among Democrats as Republican’s as Max Baucus proved in his terms as Senator. Bill Clinton cut government to balance the budget. He aided in the erasure of Smoot Hawley and he hurt American jobs by signing NAFTA and CAFTA. President Obama has likewise played the fiscal conservative card, while complaining it has been forced on him. He has even put cuts of Social Security and Medicare on the table, although neither is related to the national debt.
What is happening here is the result of the wealthiest people and the largest corporations becoming international entities. The rise of the multi-national could well herald the decline and fall of the nation state. From the perspective of the “Haves” it makes perfect sense. Why be bound by the laws of a particular nation, when you can break free and roam the world as you please? Truly, to these multi-nationals and the people behind them, the world is their oyster. The only problems they have are government regulation, taxes and those pesky workers who want more wages. The solution is to bring the 99% to a level slightly above starvation. This ensures that they will work for any amount that helps them put some food on the table. It necessitates that social assistance programs be destroyed so the peasants will have no choice but to seek shelter from devastation at some low paying job that keeps them little above subsistence.
Imagine yourself as one of the Super Rich, or as the CEO of a huge multinational corporation. My guess is that most of them see themselves as extraordinary people, chosen by fate or God to be in their exalted positions. They are able to go anywhere in the world on a whim. They don’t have one palatial home they have five, some in the world’s greatest Cities and others in the world’s most beautiful places. They don’t have one luxury car they have twenty collectibles and a fleet of limousines to take them place to place, flanked by bodyguards. While it’s true some wealthy eschew these outward signs, usually it is done as some sort of reverse snobbery, like the Kennedy penchant for driving Oldsmobiles, or J.B. Hunt driving to work every day in an old Chevy, with a paper bag lunch prepared by his wife.
The rich are not like your and me and moreover they know it. The truth is austerity is one more step on the road toward worldwide feudalism. Our wealthy class has helped to plot this out and they are served by people like Reinhart and Rogoff as courtiers and henchmen. They are leading us to a chaos they believe will result in solidifying their hold on the world and their eventual Nobility. However, when chaos descends on society through the discontent of so many, even wealth might not be protection against the violent psychopaths that gain control. That’s what I think about austerity, what do you think?
After checking out a handful of the blog articles on your web site, I really
appreciate your technique of blogging. I saved it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon.
Please check out my website as well and tell me how you feel.
It is excellent a chance to generate a number of ideas for any longer term and it is time for you to be at liberty. I discover that send and when I may I would like to give you advice a number of intriguing issues or maybe strategies. Maybe you might produce upcoming articles or blog posts concerning this post. I need to learn more things about that!
Oky1,
If it’s any consolation, there are other things going on with the spam filter that do indicate it’s simply a bug of some sort. At it’s heart, I think it’s a data indexing problem of some kind based on some of the errors I’ve seen (given our access is as an end-user of Askimet).
Thanks Gene for the patch.
I’m not some what’s up either.
Over the years sometimes it’s something simple like a tech glitch & others times it’s just simple censorship.
I know one thing right now the corrupt leaders of both parties have declared war against the people & now are in a panic as their evil has/is being exposed to the masses & they, the corrupt ones, not sure how to deal with it.
You can search this phrase below that I found to be an interesting video of someone who claims to have helped build some of this current spy grid.
Telecom Insider Reveals Everyone Is Wiretapped!
Tony C.,
Amen to that.
Oky1,
Not sure what set the spam filter off on your posts, but I approved the initial post with the link. As most are aware, the spam filter has been behaving strangely as of late.
9th attempt to post:
Below is a new petition asking for Obama to resign.
Text:
XXX
XXX
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx All text removed.
Website must be blocked here.
The site is in DC. The color of the house is White.
So I guess add White & house & petition to a search engine & you’ll find the link & this might post?
Test,
Oh gee, I wonder why wordpress would block my post of a link to a govt petition website calling for the resignnation of a certain leader?
(Looks like WordPress or something still blocking post of links?
You’ll need to rework the link at the bottom if you wish to go to that site.)
Below is a new petition asking for Obama to resign.
I didn’t feel it’s the best indictment that could have been written, but at least it’s a start.
It’s past time for US citizens to stop acting as if they are only renters of mall space & instead start behaving as they should, that they are the rightful owners of this so called mall, the USA, & they we demand our servants, our employees, respect us & pay us the rent due to us from the JP Morgans, the Walmarts & the Exxon Mobils, etc.
Stop playing Whack A Mole in that you feel strongly about this or that one off small issue.
Combine all of these many important issues with your friends & fellow countrymen.
Identify what our common “Objective” is: Freedom/Liberty.
Rediscover the written word & those word’s “Intent” of US Constitution & it’s “Bill Of Rights” & use it as a base from which to develop a “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
Encourage others to help work the “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
If you don’t wish to sign the petition below make one of your own or at least pass it along so others may have the opportunity to sign it.
petitions DOT whitehouse DOT gov petition we-demand-president-obama-resign
(Looks like WordPress or something still blocking post of links?
You’ll need to rework the link at the bottom if you wish to go to that site.)
Below is a new petition asking for Obama to resign.
I didn’t feel it’s the best indictment that could have been written, but at least it’s a start.
It’s past time for US citizens to stop acting as if they are only renters of mall space & instead start behaving as they should, that they are the rightful owners of this so called mall, the USA, & they we demand our servants, our employees, respect us & pay us the rent due to us from the JP Morgans, the Walmarts & the Exxon Mobils, etc.
Stop playing Whack A Mole in that you feel strongly about this or that one off small issue.
Combine all of these many important issues with your friends & fellow countrymen.
Identify what our common “Objective” is: Freedom/Liberty.
Rediscover the written word & those word’s “Intent” of US Constitution & it’s “Bill Of Rights” & use it as a base from which to develop a “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
Encourage others to help work the “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
If you don’t wish to sign the petition below make one of your own or at least pass it along so others may have the opportunity to sign it.
petitions DOT whitehouse DOT gov/petition/we-demand-president-obama-resign
Below is a new petition asking for Obama to resign.
I didn’t feel it’s the best indictment that could have been written, but at least it’s a start.
It’s past time for US citizens to stop acting as if they are only renters of mall space & instead start behaving as they should, that they are the rightful owners of this so called mall, the USA, & they we demand our servants, our employees, respect us & pay us the rent due to us from the JP Morgans, the Walmarts & the Exxon Mobils, etc.
Stop playing Whack A Mole in that you feel strongly about this or that one off small issue.
Combine all of these many important issues with your friends & fellow countrymen.
Identify what our common “Objective” is: Freedom/Liberty.
Rediscover the written word & those word’s “Intent” of US Constitution & it’s “Bill Of Rights” & use it as a base from which to develop a “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
Encourage others to help work the “Plan” to meet our common “Objective”.
If you don’t wish to sign the petition below make one of your own or at least pass it along so others may have the opportunity to sign it.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-demand-president-obama-resign/sTtJndXm
A fair summation that I’ll second, Tony.