Report: U.S. Knew Of Saddam Hussein’s Use Of Chemical Weapons And Supplied Intelligence Used In Attack

300px-Chemical_weapons_Halabja_Iraq_March_1988The Obama Administration is publicly moving toward possible military strikes in Syria, a major escalation in yet another war for the United States. The reason is the likely use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government against rebel controlled areas. In the meantime, documents have been released that show that the United States has been hypocritical on the use of such weapons. According to Foreign Policy magazine (a highly respected publication), the documents show that the Reagan Administration not only knew of the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi Regime in the Iran-Iraq war but supplied the intelligence and satellite imagery used in the attacks. The CIA then sat on evidence of the attacks while Iraq denied their use.

The Reagan Administration was concerned that Iran would win the war in 1988 and discovered build ups of Iranian forces near weak points in Iraqi lines. The United States supplied Iraq with detailed maps and images and intelligence on the location of the forces, their air support and other intelligence. A former official is quoted as saying that they knew Saddam Hussein was going to use chemical weapons and that the United States had evidence of the use of mustard gas and sarin prior to four major offensives in early 1988. The U.S. then assured the public that it had no knowledge about the attacks or acquiesce to the use of chemical weapons.

220px-Iranian_Soldiers_in_Trench_Warfare245px-Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981Of course, the great irony is that we later cited the use of chemical weapons in the war to justify our actions against Iraq in the second Iraq war — insisting that any maniac who would use them in 1988 would use them again. The government never told the American people that the earlier use of chemical weapons was done with our knowledge and tacit support.

Now, the Obama Administration is publicly moving military assets closer to Syria and is preparing for “all contingencies” after the Syrians “crossed the red line” set out by President Obama. Obama has been suggesting that the United States would attack if chemical weapons were used. He has already intervened in the supply and training of rebel forces in the country.

The recent release of documents, again, show a shocking degree of duplicity and dishonesty in our foreign policy on such issues. Notably, the Reagan Administration debated whether Iran could prove the attacks and advised that the international response was likely to be muted. Indeed, the biggest use of the attacks would come later . . . when we cited it in support of our second Iraqi war under George W. Bush.

Source: Foreign Policy

89 thoughts on “Report: U.S. Knew Of Saddam Hussein’s Use Of Chemical Weapons And Supplied Intelligence Used In Attack”

  1. Hello, i think that i saw you visited my weblog
    so i came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to
    enhance my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  2. A person necessarily help to ake severely posts I would state.
    Thaat is the first time I frequented your website pawge aand so far?
    I surprised with the anaysis you made to make this
    actual post amazing. Fantastic process!

  3. Hello friends, its impressive piece of writing on
    the topic of educationand entirely defined, keep it up all the

  4. Quality articles is the key to attract the viewers to visit the
    website, that’s what this website is providing.

  5. Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!

  6. Recently, one website discussed 10 features they believe that “Grand Theft Auto V” needs to have (or
    not have) to make this another winning installment in the
    popular series. And it’s almost like appreciating something like South Park, where
    you’re like, this is just satire of what criminals are.
    A person can be arrested for violating a no contact order even if the victim initiates the contact
    and calls the defedant.

Comments are closed.