Schiff v. Ratcliffe: DNI Reports That Hunter Biden’s Laptop Is Not Believed To Be Part Of A Russian Disinformation Campaign

Recently, we discussed how House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff stated publicly that the recently disclosed laptop information from Hunter Biden was clearly part of a Russian intelligence operation. Schiff said that “we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin.” This morning, John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence, stated categorically that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not part of a Russian disinformation campaign.  What is most notable is that Ratcliffe has stated that Schiff and his Committee have not been given any intelligence to support Schiff’s conclusion.  The incident has raised lingering criticism of Schiff who previously told the public that he had clear evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia after that allegation was rejected in repeated investigations, including Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Schiff never produced the incriminating evidence and later it was shown that the widely cited Steele dossier was based on a source who was considered to be a Russian agent.

There is ample reason to suspicious about the timing of this disclosure. However, I have written that this serious concern is separate from the question of whether the emails are fabricated. The Biden campaign has not given the most obvious responses to such a scandal. It is important to keep in mind that Hillary Clinton and the DNC were actually hacked by Russian intelligence but the underlying emails were true.

Schiff now finds himself, again, in the position of supporting a claim of evidence of Russian collusion. He will have to show that this laptop discovery was engineered by Russian intelligence.  If the owner is speaking the truth, the computer was dropped off in April 2019 with the intent to be used in the 2020 campaign.

Ratcliffe stated in an interview that

“it’s funny that some of the people that complained the most about intelligence being politicized are the ones politicizing intelligence and unfortunately in this case, it is Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who as you pointed out on Friday said that the intelligence community believes that Hunter Biden’s laptop and e-mails on it are part of some Russian disinformation campaign. Let me be clear, the intelligence community doesn’t believe that because there is no intelligence that supports and we shared no intelligence with chairman Schiff or any other member of Congress that Hunter Biden’s laptop is part of some Russian disinformation campaign. It’s simply not true.”

Ratcliffe accused Schiff of politicizing intelligence and stated “Don’t drag the intelligence community into this. Hunter Biden’s laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign and I think it’s clear the American people know that.”

Schiff should explain the basis for his conclusion that this is part of a Russian disinformation campaign. Someone is clearly misrepresenting the intelligence and the public should know the basis for these irreconcilable statements.

452 thoughts on “Schiff v. Ratcliffe: DNI Reports That Hunter Biden’s Laptop Is Not Believed To Be Part Of A Russian Disinformation Campaign”

  1. Disappointing entry in what’s an increasingly disappointing blog.

    To my knowledge, Schiff hasn’t denied what the DNI said, as the DNI ought to know. Schiff has correctly insisted that the narrative being pressed about the laptop story by Biden’s enemies has its origin and continuing support and direction from Moscow. The partisan spin on the laptop story must be distinguished from the laptop contents.

    1. The real question is why the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs) sent Sanpete out far and wide to spread “fake news.”

      The Harris-Biden ticket is going to win.

      Why are the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs) so frantic?

          1. No doubt. Resistance to hyperpartisanship must seem exotic here.

            Notice that the responses don’t address the substance of what I said at all. Random hyperpartisan noise is accepted here instead.

            1. sanpete:

              “Schiff has correctly insisted that the narrative being pressed about the laptop story by Biden’s enemies has its origin and continuing support and direction from Moscow.” “Notice that the responses don’t address the substance of what I said at all.”
              ************************************
              Oh, enough of your smug tut-tutting:

              “BLITZER: Federal authorities, including the FBI, are investigating whether recently published emails that purport to deal — to detail, I should say, the business dealings of Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, are connected to an ongoing Russian disinformation effort targeting the Biden campaign in the days leading up to the election.

              Let’s discuss with the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Adam Schiff. Congressman, thanks so much for joining us.

              Does it surprise you at all that this information Rudy Giuliani is peddling very well could be connected to some sort of Russian government disinformation campaign?

              REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): Well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. That’s been clear for well over a year now that they’ve been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son.

              And, you know, the idea that the president, that the White House Counsel and others were made aware that Giuliani was being used by Russian intelligence and using Russian intelligence in the sense of meeting with an agent of the Kremlin and pushing out this Kremlin false narrative, the idea that they were knowing and still on the floor of the Senate during the impeachment trial, pushing this Kremlin narrative is pretty breathtaking.

              But I guess at this point we can’t be shocked by anything this administration does, no matter how craven. But, clearly, the origins of this whole smear are from the Kremlin, and the president is only too happy to have Kremlin help and try to amplify it.

              BLITZER: It’s not like Rudy Giuliani is peddling this information in a vacuum, Congressman. Take a look at this picture of the president in the Oval Office holding up a copy of the New York Post touting this conspiracy theory. It’s made its way all the way to the commander in chief with a big smile on his face.

              SCHIFF: Yes. Well, look, I think we know who the driving force behind this smear has been all along and it’s been the president and the Kremlin. The Kremlin has an obvious interest in denigrating Joe Biden. They want Donald Trump to win.

              They recognize he’s a weak president. He’s been utterly unwilling to stand up to Putin and other autocrats. He has diminished NATO. He has criticized and weakened our alliance with our transatlantic partners. He’s been the gift that doesn’t stop giving for the Kremlin. So, clearly, they want to help him. So they want to denigrate the vice president. The Intelligence Community has made that abundantly clear.

              𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐥𝐢𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐯𝐚𝐥 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐩 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐕𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐏𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧, 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐩 𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐊𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐥𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞.”

              I’m guessing English is your second language, sanpete.

              1. “I’m guessing English is your second language, sanpete.”

                As I observed in another thread recently, hyperpartisans lack a sense of irony.

                Any English speaker not blinded by their hyperpartisanship should be able to see that what you quote fits what I said entirely. Schiff nowhere says the laptop or its contents were invented or planted by the Kremlin. He says the smear originated there, which is true. This is an extension of Moscow’s old smear against Biden.

                Bias makes reading hard.

                1. sanpete:

                  “As I observed in another thread recently, hyperpartisans lack a sense of irony.

                  Any English speaker not blinded by their hyperpartisanship should be able to see that what you quote fits what I said entirely. Schiff nowhere says the laptop or its contents were invented or planted by the Kremlin. He says the smear originated there, which is true. This is an extension of Moscow’s old smear against Biden.

                  Bias makes reading hard.”
                  **********************************
                  Thanks for the word salad with a side of purple prose. Now deal with the substance and the complete rebuttal of you sophist take on Schiffty. He says exactly that, “𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐥𝐢𝐧.” Look up “come from.” As for your mindless quip that “[b]ias making reading hard,” I’d say lying makes credibility impossible.

                  1. Amazing. I just addressed that in very plain and simple terms. Read what you quoted.

                    I don’t concern myself with your credibility, only with your arguments.

                    1. sanpete:

                      ” I just addressed that in very plain and simple terms.”
                      **********************
                      Appropriate since the moderately complex ones have you baffled. Both the DNI, Professor Turley and the author of the piece I quoted, all see the lie from Schifty yet you remain unfazed. Like I said, it’s ESL.

                    2. Your appeal to the authority of other partisans who share your partisan view doesn’t advance your position, and doesn’t address what I said. Understandably, since what I said is plainly true. Nonetheless, if you develop any reason against it, let me know.

                    3. Mespo Sanpete pointed out that I posted the NY Post article in full on another thread but since I see your engagement and though I firmly believe you have read the article I will post its address. It has a video of Ratcliffe that demonstrates a well tempered man who is more than capable of dealing with liars like Schiff.

                      https://nypost.com/2020/10/19/john-ratcliffe-info-on-hunter-biden-laptop-not-russian-disinformation/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20201019&mpweb=755-9129976-720703111

                    4. Those who accuse others of lying when it’s already clearly been pointed out that they aren’t lying have their own trouble with honesty. Hyperpartisanship displaces all other values, including intellectual honesty.

                    5. As indeed I have. It’s easy to see who quickly accuses others of dishonesty and who doesn’t.

            2. Sanpete, you haven’t said much of anything. You did, however, draw conclusions based on a lousy foundation. But I don’t expect any more from you because I already saw what you are made of in our last back and forth. You dealt with turning words and didn’t bother to actually read and comprehend the email that we were focused on. In the end you refused to acknowledge the last 5 words of the email. You choose agreeable opinions to then use as fact. Not good.

              Credibility is a problem when one acts like you have acted.

              1. Pure empty hand waving, as even you should be able to see. And clearly false, as far as that goes.

                If you have any reasoned objection to what I said, stop lashing out long enough to express it. Not interested in your or anyone else’s views on credibility, only in your arguments, which must stand on their own merits.

                1. In this case I responded in the fashion you are used to and how you respond to fact and logic. I did tell you, however, that you drew your conclusions on a lousy foundation because that is your calling card.

                  There is no need for me to again add fact or logic. I did that in our initial discussion where I gave you the benefit of the doubt and provided you with the last 5 words of the email that you conveniently left out. In another response I posted out your obsession with the slightest bit of doubt despite faced with enormous proven facts.

                  You are a rhetorician but not in a good way. It makes no sense to play with your tail until it breaks off. It will only only grow back again.

                  1. Again, if you have any reasoned objection to what I said, stop lashing out, and outrageously projecting, long enough to express it. Thanks.

                    1. You are intentionally being provocative. There is no end to the foolishness you are displaying. Above I explained why. You will parse words until all understanding of the discussion disappears. You will use negatives to confuse others and convince yourself that you are correct when it is obvious you are wrong.

                      You have been provided the data and the logic. In return you provide a word salad. You even lie by omission. You quoted only 2 parts of the email and left out the the third. You have lost all credibility.

                      To make it easy for one to understand what type of person you are I will copy what was previously said.

                      There are three parts to the email. The invite, the spending of time and then the goodbye. The final part makes it absolutely clear that the meeting had already taken place.

                      “Thank you for inviting me to D.C. and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent some time together”

                      (You left out the rest)

                      “I could come to you office … on my way to airport. “ (Spelling and grammar errors kept as they were written.)

                    2. Amazing, and amazingly wrong, but in any case, the wrong thread. Let me know if you develop any reasoned objection to anything I’ve said here.

                    3. Again you try to obscure the issues with backhanded accusations. You were wrong. You lied by omission. You have done that on several topics. I have provided in context opinion along with the facts. You have done almost none of that in our discussions.You are not a credible blogger.

            3. You insult America’s Lawyer and think you’re going to get away with it?

              No more “smug tut-tuting.”

              No more “word salad with a side of purple prose.”

              No more communist (liberal, progressive, socialist, democrat, RINO) subterfuge and prevarication around here, comrade.

              Take your “fake” bullchip back to Hillary’s hideout.

                    1. Sanpete:

                      Keep in mind that Allen is arguably the most abusive commenter on this thread. He will claim you are ‘lying’ regardless of facts.

                      Allen has the full support of this blog’s Moderator. Which means Allen can get as abusive as he wants! But if you attempt to return the insults, the Moderator will swoop right in to delete your reply while letting Allen’s insults stick.

                    2. PaintChips you are a paranoid twit. That is why you use so many aliases. I get no help from the moderator and have had posts removed and posts that never went up. I’ve had times where I was unable to post. However I am not a crying baby like you. Recognize that most of the problems have to do with WordPress not a human.

                    3. I’ve noticed a certain proclivity to think others are being dishonest. A common effect of hyperpartisanship is the inability to see good faith in those with other views.

        1. You think this is bad wait till you meet the gender-ambiguous birther who writes limericks and the one who responds to everything by quoting the same Randy Newman song. We’ve got quite the menagerie here.

    1. Wow counselor. First you were able to say a “report” proved the case and now a “source”. You are f…g good!

        1. Kurtz, you’ve totally convinced me. Why didn’t you say earlier there was a “report” and a “source” who validated evidence that Joe was in on a Hunter’s activities?

          Now let’s go after Jared and Ivanka. We’re both against corrupt families, right?

          “A real estate company part-owned by Jared Kushner has received $90m in foreign funding from an opaque offshore vehicle since he entered the White House as a senior adviser to his father-in-law Donald Trump.

          Investment has flowed from overseas to the company, Cadre, while Kushner works as an international envoy for the US, according to corporate filings and interviews. The money came through a vehicle run by Goldman Sachs in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven that guarantees corporate secrecy.

          Kushner, who is married to Trump’s elder daughter Ivanka, kept a stake in Cadre after joining the administration, while selling other assets. His holding is now valued at up to $50m, according to his financial disclosure documents.

          Cadre’s foreign funding could create hidden conflicts of interest for Kushner as he performs his work for the US government, according to some ethics experts, who raised concerns over the lack of transparency around the investments….”

          https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/10/jared-kushner-real-estate-cadre-goldman-sachs

  2. hunter is prolly locked up in a safe house somewhere

    if he’s smart he’s going to stay away from the white powder

    one undetectable grain of fentanyl in his coke will take him off the ledger for good

    might solve a lot of problems for powerful people

  3. These comments are always filled with shills for Biden, incessantly playing a single note: red herrings.

    Don’t feed the beast.

      1. “There are at least as many shills for Trump here.”

        There may be since we know so many of your postings are from your pretend friends and you like to flash different icons all over the blog. Are you an exhibitionist?

  4. Now you know why the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs) demanded they be allowed to illegally move the election from “…Tuesday next after the first Monday in November…,” one single day, to execute a random mass mailing of ballots and to harvest ballots.

    They wanted to take full advantage of the pandemic they initiated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology with China before “its luster wore off,” to deny citizens a fair election process and to avoid October surprises, such as the Hunter Biden e-mails.

  5. Turley: your blog is getting sad. We’ve all been expecting the “October surprise”–the blockbuster reveal as a way to pivot away from Trump’s criminal failures, the mounting coronavirus deaths and positive cases, his endless lying…on and on and on. To be honest, the reputation of the law school where you teach (when you aren’t spending your time trying to save Trump from himself) has dropped a lot in my esteem because you allow your credentials to be used by the most-unfit and deceitful person ever to occupy the White House. You are used by the Trump campaign to attack media and any Democrat who dares to criticize der fueherer. You quote agency heads appointed by Trump (who only hires people who will tell the lies he wants told), as if we could ever believe anything coming from that “administration”. In today’s piece, you once again repeat the lie about Mueller’s findings–Trump was not exonerated, and could never be because he did not cooperate, which hamstrung Mueller’s investigation. Trump is very heavily tied to Russia, but Mueller was denied direct interviews/depositions with the key players, including Trump and Russian actors. Trump obstructed justice. This is just sad.

    1. Natasha, the GOP led Senate Intel Comm report which was released only in August verified the Russian interference and Trump campaign collusion, but Turley not only avoids that but continues the Barr line BS about exoneration. He’s a hack.

      1. distract, deflect, deny. oh wait they haven’t denied them yet. because they’re authentic. so stick with distract and deny and then ladle on the insults gravy. keep it up we gonna know soon if it works

      2. Hey stupid. Collusion is STILL not a crime. But your persons are under ongoing investigation for conspiring among other things.

      3. Joe Friday you are a whacko idiot. The recent disclosures in the Flynn case, etc., have very well empirically established, that Obama, Biden, AG,CIA, NI, FBI Dir Comey, and a few other FBI agents were corrupt in the process of pursuing Flynn in an attempted Coup and squeeze Flynn to get to Trump. If an outgoing GWB administration (or any Repub admin) had pulled these escapades, then there would be as Hillary would say; “Hell to pay. The MSM would hound it assiduously and demand charges. Is going to the bathroom and wiping a science or an art? It is an art, and Hunter has allegedly failed the art of the wiping process of himself and the hard drive.

        1. Don’t expect a crack addict to know what a degaussing coil is

          at a minimum elder Joe is discredited by his gross incompetence of allowing his son to do anything in his name ever at all

          let alone dipping his beak in corrupt foreign influence schemes.

          wow! he is not on Hillary’s level at all. compare the two and you will see the huge difference. Hillary was a skilled operator of historic proportions. When history writes about her with some distance, everyone will understand not only was she the most powerful woman in American history, but one of the most powerful politicians of the past three decades. if not the most.

          Joe is so far below her I find it amazing that he’s even allowed to wear her mantle. Except, hey, he’s got 47 years in government, you can’t say he’s not experienced!

          I don’t like Hillary, but i admire her. Joe I kind of like, even now, but I don’t admire him.

    2. Natacha,

      Perhaps you model yourself too much like Schiff…making all sorts of accusations that are proven to be meritless or disproven.

      You are being a true Leftist….attacking a good principled Man with sterling qualifications and do so because he does espouse your own world view.

      Shame on you.

      How about you apologize to Jonathan Turley and then either provide your own evidence which Schiff still has not done on anything.

      That or just run along to Facebook or Twitter where truth and free speech are not allowed.

      1. More important than Hunter Biden’s emails is the effort to ensure that Natacha and Joe Friday never reproduce.

      2. No, sir. I am pointing out the massive Trump/Fox News lying, pivoting and distortions that Jonathan Turley ignores in order to focus on attacking Democrats and the media over matters, in the long-run, are largely not important and pale in comparison to the daily coronavirus death and mounting infection tolls. He is lending his credentials to support the pattern of deceit and incompetence that has real-world implications. The US has not “turned the corner” on coronavirus–it is surging. People are dying because of Trump’s incompetence, and I am baffled how any person with academic credentials can support this regime by attacking media and Democratic politicians.

    3. Here is the short version. Your Mr. Putin outed the DNC as the USA version as recognizable as the Communist Party of the USSR. So Natacha or whatever whoever you really are. like all trolls you never provide a fact or a source and might as well sign your name as IvanBacon or Anonymous.

  6. 4 Years Ago This Month The “Access Hollywood” Tapes Surfaced

    Donald Trump was clearly heard saying he likes to grab women by their private parts. Within days, mainstream media reported that many women have accused Trump of unwanted advances. At last count that number was up to ’26’.

    Yet Trump supporters were totally unmoved by the “Acess Hollywood” tapes. Nor did they even flinch at the number of women complaining about Trump’s unwanted advances. It was like those women didn’t matter in the least.

    So the question here becomes: “Why should Biden supporters care in the least about Hunter Biden’s alleged emails??” However authentic they’re supposed to be, are we supposed to vote for Trump now??

    It’s hard to believe this development is going to change the minds of any voter when the pandemic Trump denied is still an active threat in almost every state.

        1. So you say and hope that knowing that the spectre of the largest voting bloc has never been counted in any of the Polls and is like the Damocles sword of 2016 still hanging by a single thread waiting to be released. Another way of saying don’t be surprised when Hillary flees to the woods with her vodka bottles prior to the conclusion of her ongoing investigation and the Bidens the same both still under ongoing investigation and Pelosi gets charged with a felony count of trying to blackmail or strong arm the US Government in order to ensure their own party members children die of starvation. All so you can waste another valuable space barfing up nothing.

      1. Kurtz, can we quote you on that?

        Maybe you want to look into this since you’re hot on the trail of corruption:

        “A real estate company part-owned by Jared Kushner has received $90m in foreign funding from an opaque offshore vehicle since he entered the White House as a senior adviser to his father-in-law Donald Trump.

        Investment has flowed from overseas to the company, Cadre, while Kushner works as an international envoy for the US, according to corporate filings and interviews. The money came through a vehicle run by Goldman Sachs in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven that guarantees corporate secrecy.

        Kushner, who is married to Trump’s elder daughter Ivanka, kept a stake in Cadre after joining the administration, while selling other assets. His holding is now valued at up to $50m, according to his financial disclosure documents.

        Cadre’s foreign funding could create hidden conflicts of interest for Kushner as he performs his work for the US government, according to some ethics experts, who raised concerns over the lack of transparency around the investments….”

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/10/jared-kushner-real-estate-cadre-goldman-sachs

        Ivanka has gotten some favorable business rulings from the Chinese while “working” in the WH, and who knows who the old man owes in Russia.

        1. joe tries to distract from the issue in question by retreading some weak old allegations which he hopes will confuse the readers into seeing some equivalency. thanks for that joe keep trying

          meanwhile the story that Twitter tried to censor grows like a cancer eating away at your hopes, building the anxiety of Dem Leadership cheerleaders busy trying to deflect attention

          1. Kurtz, one could just as easily say the Hunter Biden story is a distraction from the Pandemic. Or from Trump’s tax issues. Or from Trump’s unhinged behavior at the debate.

            The idea that we’re supposed to drop everything to focus on Hunter Biden is irrational at this point.

            1. “The idea that we’re supposed to drop everything to focus on Hunter Biden is irrational at this point.”

              You may be focussing on Hunter but the real focus is on Joe and how Hunter is an intermediary bringing in large sums of money from China, Russia , Ukraine and elsewhere while selling America down the drain.

            2. Anon, sure, of course all the pertinent issues should be considered. However the issue at hand in the blog host’s essay is the Hunter Biden emails.

          2. Joe Friday’s mind is a mess. He can’t deal in depth with a singular issue and probably can’t even remember the difference between truth and lies.

        1. i’m placing bets that they’re rock solid.

          5 days of failure to deny from Biden Campaign is the basis for my belief. DEEMED ADMITTED

    1. Wow, we learn something new every day.
      I wasn’t aware there was a Felonious Locker Room Talk Statute in the US Code that was on par with child rape and treason.

      1. sounds about right and the DNC continued to protect him and still does. His wife another victimizer of women continued to protect him and still does and so do their senior staffs so….. when is the the first one going to go States Evidence and hang all of them? I’m betting on Huma Gotcha unless she’s a fan of rooming with diesels
        ;

  7. I have scanned Turley’s source (the Fox news article) but I haven’t listened to the DNI Ratcliffe interview:

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-hunter-biden-laptop-emails-not-russian-disinformation-campaign

    Is the backup hard drive that went to Giuliani and the NYP also in the FBI’s possession and have they compared the two file by file? It sounds like DNI Ratcliffe is saying the information released by the NYP is a faithful mirror of the information they have on the laptop in their possession and that neither is part of a Russian disinformation operation.

    1. Jonathan, Ratcliffe only said it was Russian disinformation, The rest is your imagination. The FBI has had it since December according to a grand jury subpoena which the NY Post posted a copy of. We don’t know if that and other Post information is authentic and Ratcliffe did not say any of it was.

    2. The hard drive that was copied by the vendor was provided to the FBI. You are getting confused with the hard drive that was copied by the vendor that was provided by the FBI with the hard drive that was copied by the vendor that was provided to the FBI. It is possible your external drive is not being read by your hard drive. Do you use a solid state HD or a jump drive?

      these are important questions

        1. Oh, that’s right Kurtz! I forgot about how the FBI and CIA announced an new investigation into the Trump campaign just before the 2016 election while protecting Hillary from public knowledge about the investigation into her emails. No wonder Trump and his cult followers like you trust him – he is an obvious humble straight shooter of unquestioned veracity, loyalty, and selfless character – but think anyone not in your group is a corrupt hack. Good call on character there and no doubt you can’t go wrong or get suckered like a mark at the State Fair.

          Just one more thing though. I think I might have gotten Hilary and Trump confused in my 2nd sentence. What do you think?

            1. OK Kurtz, thanks for straightening that out for me. For a minute I was confused and forgot that it was Hillary that Comey protected by hiding her investigation from the the American people just before the election while broadcasting the investigation into Trump’s campaign to the public. What a scumbag and no wonder you and Trump are mad at him, even if he was wildy popular with agents in the field. And that Obama hold over Wray, what a dishonest Deep Stater. Why doesn’t Trump replace him with one of his own appointees?

              1. don’t be so sure he was “wildly popular”

                or, think what you like. Either way, the FBI careerists are in trouble

                1. I am sure from 1st hand and published knowledge. Did every single G-man like him? NO. Was he wildly popular with most? Yes.

    3. yep that’s what it sounds like Maxson

      authenticity not denied, hence DEEMED ADMITTED

      see the reports on how joe profited from his son Hunter’s corrupt deals

        1. Hunter Biden emails ‘identify Joe Biden as ”the Big Guy” who would receive 10% share in deal with Chinese energy firm’, report says
          Hunter Biden was involved with China’s largest private energy company CEFC
          He was given equity, ownership of a holding company and huge consulting fees
          He also allegedly held a share of the equity for his father Joe Biden
          Sources told Fox that a person identified only as ‘the Big Guy’ in an email about equity payments was the former Vice President
          Hunter was dealing with CEFC chairman Ye Jianming who has since vanished
          In one email, Hunter said a lucrative deal would be ‘interesting for my family’

          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8849687/Hunter-Biden-emails-identify-Joe-Biden-deal-Chinese-energy-firm-report-says.html

          1. lets find out more about vanished billionaire corrupt figure tied to bidens, Ye Jianming

            https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/2168239/vanished-chinese-oil-boss-linked-senior-officials-bribery-case

            “Ye Jianming, the former boss of CEFC China Energy who vanished from public sight in March, has been linked to a bribery case involving a toppled senior official, according to court documents aired on state television on Thursday night.
            Wang Sanyun, the former Communist Party secretary in Gansu province, went on trial in a court in Zhengzhou in Henan province on Thursday.
            Another Chinese tycoon vanishes as business empire begins to crumble
            21 Mar 2018

            Wang also helped CEFC Hainan, another subsidiary, to obtain a US$4.8 billion credit line through Hu, who retired from the China Development Bank last month.

            The report said Wang had pleaded guilty to taking a total of 66.8 million yuan (US$9.7 million) in bribes. There was no word on any sentence.
            It was the first time that state media had reported details of the allegations against Ye since he disappeared earlier this year.
            CEFC China’s debt woes widen as unit defaults on commercial paper
            20 Aug 2018

            CEFC rose spectacularly from obscurity to become China’s fourth-largest oil conglomerate in the space of a few years.
            Its rise was helped by China Development Bank, a state lender, which pledged billions of dollars to the private firm to finance its aggressive expansion and headline-grabbing acquisition deals, including a failed attempt to buy a 14 per cent stake in Russian oil giant Rosneft.”

            TSK TSK HUNTER WAS IN DEEP WITH PEOPLE SO CORRUPT EVEN THE CHICOMS HAVE LOCKED THEM UP AND “DISAPPEARED” THEM

            DON’T EXPECT ANY “TELL ALL” BOOKS COMING FROM YE

          2. Listening to the DNI interview now, Mr. Kurtz. Sounds like Ratcliffe is saying the FBI may have an open investigation into Hunter Biden for corruption and fraud. He’s not saying there is an open investigation, but he is suggesting the possibility.

            1. one suspects they do and they will say nothing before the election.

              gee, will Hunter step forth and deny them?

              obviously not. He’s gone into hiding and will invoke the 5th if they come to “question” him

              1. Mr. Kurtz writes: “One suspects they do and they will say nothing before the election.”

                That’s my read on it, too.

                The laptop was already in play during the Trump Impeachment. DNI Ratcliffe agrees the FBI can legitimately be pressed to explain why it didn’t bring its investigation of the Hunter Biden laptop forward at that time.

                Blast from the past:

                https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/lawmakers-press-fbi-director-christopher-wray-political-probes/story?id=68774531

            2. Yes, Jonathan, and I’m sure you remember how Comey and Brennan announced investigations into Trump;s campaign 2 weeks before the 2016 election.

              Wait, you don’t?

  8. On another topic, there has been a tremendous scandal at George Washington University. Another white person has been caught passing for black.

    I am always brushing off the entire idea of cultural appropriation. A white child wearing a Black Panther costume, braiding your hair, or wearing Dutch prints is not appropriating a black culture. However, here I am proven wrong. There is, cultural appropriation is indeed real, when a white person pretends to be black, and gets all the benefits thereof. And there are significant benefits, no matter what those in identity politics try to say.

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/03/jessica-krug-admitted-she-lied-about-being-black-after-being-caught/ There is a link in this article to the white professor going off on a tirade, in which she speaks in a street dialect, that is absolutely cringeworthy.

    https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/17/why-the-left-needs-us-all-to-believe-the-united-states-is-racist-forever/

    No non Jew in Nazi Germany pretended to be a Jew. Whites did not pretend to be Afrikaners in South Africa under Apartheid.

    It is my firm belief that every Caucasian who pretends to be black knows, at least at the subconscious level, that America is not a racist country.

    Is pretending to be a race that scores better on identity politics, in order to get attention, career opportunities, and other advantages, considered free speech? If it was used to get a job, or a promotion, should it not be considered fraud?

      1. The NY Post was founded by Alexander Hamilton and has a history of breaking stories Democrats don’t like. So they reject it. It has as much authority as any other private news source.

        Focus on Biden campaign for a second. They’ve had 5 days to deny the emails and they have not.

        DEEMED ADMITTED

        DNI has not cast shade on them either.

        Wake up. They’re for real

        1. Or,maybe, they’re ignoring the Fox News/Limbaugh/Trump campaign drivel as the unsuccessful “October surprise” we’ve all been expecting. They aren’t required to dignify Trump’s lies and desperate attempts to smear Biden with a response.

          1. translation: use ignore tactic and hope the mass media will be as cooperative as twitter was at burying the story

            1. Translation: when the first Biden attack failed–i.e. “Hunter Biden is a crackhead and his father is a crook”, they wen to”Sleepy Joe is senile”, which offended senior citizens a key Republican demographic. When that crashed and burned, they went back to “Hunter Biden is a crackhead and his father is a crook”. It’s all predictable, and it won’t work. There is no “story” here.

    1. I think you meant to say whites in RSA did not pretend to be black or colored under the apartheid caste system. Afrikaaners are the descendants of Dutch settlers in the RSA and were vying for the top power position in the caste system against the Anglo-white population.

      Also generally you can’t pretend to be an Afrikaaner because they speak a dialect of Dutch and you know it as a native or you dont, its obvious if a RSA white citizen was an Anglo and not Dutch.

      But your point Karen is well taken. The black people as a “protected class” have super-position over the rest of us who remain “equals”

      Systemic racism, if anything, acts against the white native born population, not blacks.

    2. Karen, the Federalist is the most reliable source of political shenanigans by the Left. Their authors are above reproach. the NY Post is quite good especially columns by Miranda Devine and others.

      good catch

  9. Quick Q & A session everyone;

    Q: How can you tell that House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff is lying?

    A: His mouth is moving.

    Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has proven over the last 4 years that he is a fully consumed progressive political hack that rationalizes anything progressive and “attacks” anything not progressive. He has proven to me that he’s a propagandist that’s interested in only one thing, more political power for progressives; I no longer put any credence in anything he says or writes. My opinion of Rep. Adam Schiff is he’s a liar.

    Furthermore…

    John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence, stating categorically that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not part of a Russian disinformation campaign destroys the Democrats arguments. It’s signature significant that CNN is completely silent on this public statement from Director of National Intelligence. CNN has turned into a pure propaganda foundation for Democrats.

  10. Biden campaign called a lid until Thursday. Joe is in debate prep mode.

    Where’s Kamala?

    The campaign is hiding her too. Unlikeable awful Kamala has to be hidden away from voters as well. Women don’t like her. Blacks don’t like her. Californians don’t like her. Who likes Kamala?

    1. Oh Anon, the billionaires in California love her. That’s why she’s on the slate. They own the Democratic party leadership at this time.

      1. That’s right Kurtz, and working men like you and the other tassle loafer stevedores and tax lawyers is what is keeping John Henry Trump going in his lunch pail campaign. Those corporatists and billionaires are still ticked over that tax increase he laid on them .

        What a joke.

        1. i have numerous times linked to news reports in your precious mass media explaining how Kamala has tons of support from California billionaires. You can deny all you like, it’s well known

          AND IT’S WELL KNOWN INSIDE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND AMONG THE VOTERS

          were you last to get the memo?

        2. I actually do have a pair of bruno magli tasseled loafers. i like to think they’re the same model OJ was wearing when he offed Nicole.

          I got them for free second hand from a relative. good news is they fit me well. high quality!

          On the weekend now that winter approaches, I can be found in DOC MARTENS boots

          1. MK: “. . . OJ was wearing when he offed Nicole.”

            Wait, what? I thought she was murdered by Colombian drug lords.

      1. The less voters see and hear Kamala, the better it is for their campaign. She’s dragging them with her unlikeability. They are happy to have an excuse to keep her out of public. She’s that bad.

        1. The misogyny of people who support Trump in 2020 never ceases to amaze me. On the one hand, you have attractive, intelligent, educated and accomplished women like Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Governor Whitmer, Michelle Obama and others who somehow are “unlikeable”. They are accused of crimes, accused of all sorts of deceitful, unethical and laughingly untrue things (like Michelle is really male) and evil things (like the Q Anon child sacrifice, blood drinking, and pedophilia lies). On the other hand, people like you support a bloated, egotistical narcissistic liar who was supported by his father well into his forties, who bankrupted 6 businesses, who has been sued literally thousands of times, who won’t listen to medical experts, whose businesses are under water, who is in debt to the tune of over a billion dollars but won’t say to whom, and whose incompetence has resulted in the deaths of almost 250,000 Americans, and whose lack of leadership has resulted in 8 million positive coronavirus cases, who singlehandedly destroyed a successful economy he inherited, and you support him?

          1. I never accused Hillary of all that Q stuff. I accuse her of engineering needless and counterproductive war in the middle east.
            And I could list some other things that are verified. I have no need for Q crazy talk to find legitimate criticisms of her.

            But she is a major power, dominates the Dem party even now. She is head and shoulders above those other women. They are not fit to tie her shoelaces. Hillary is America’s Margaret Thatcher, history will record her as the most cunning woman of our lifetimes, and more powerful than her husband was, over the long term.

            Harris and Whitmer are players, who look up to her with admiration. Obama, is not a player, just envious.
            There is no comparison between Michelle and Hillary except that they were both first ladies.

            Let me tell you something. If a woman politician needs to play on her gender, then she’s not powerful like Hillary was and is. Nobody is shining Hillary’s apple because she’s a woman.
            She is waaaaay past that.

  11. Note that Ratcliffe does not verify the authenticity of the Hunter Biden “hard drive”, and remember, the FBI has had it since December.

    Turley does not note that the information – even if authentic – proves nothing about Joe Biden. The comments are all from Hunter and are ambiguous at best. Of course Biden doesn’t want to talk about it because the “damage” Turley is hoping for to Joe Biden – he doesn’t hide it – is disproportional to the seriousness of the evidence, even if authenticated, which it is not. Turley wants to be part of an October surprise and he doesn’t care about either it’s veracity or meaning. What does that say about his character?

    You want hints at scandals? Why do Ivanka and Jared have WH positions while doing business in China and the Middle East? Do you really believe Don Jr and Eric do not keep the president up on who’s doing business with them and who does them favors? Do you think being heavily in debt – some of it to foreign entities – is not a problem and something we don;t need to know about?

    1. PS Did I mention that both Trump and Jared are in serious debt? Did you know that there is evidence that Jared is being bailed out by oil sheiks in the ME?

      Maybe amateur sleuth Turley want to get right on that. I’ll wait.

        1. If Joe wins he might be one of the richest Presidents ever even if we don’t see the money. He might even be a billionaire from the Chinese alone. He certainly has sold our country out to the Chinese so he must have made a big profit.

    2. Well the lazy FBI slugs have had plenty of time to look at it.

      OR ARE THEY WAITING FOR CROWDSTRIKE TO DO THE FORENSICS FOR THEM?

      Let the FBI spill the beans on this pronto.

    3. The second paragraph has nothing to do with the subject the first paragraph is pure BS as it’s bee verified by a number of sources including the China scam and the European scams. But the biggest one is the oil field scam.

  12. Where are all our Democratic friends who so often told us “believe the intelligence community!”

    SILENT AND HIDING

  13. There shouldn’t be any surprise by the timing of Hunter Biden’s laptop email disclosures. The FBI had it for months and did nothing. The private efforts were to bring the information to light since the corrupt FBI wouldn’t do so. The FBI has been stonewalling a lot of critical information involving the coup against Trump via the fake Russiagate travesty.

    And now Bevan Cooney, a former partner of Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, has flipped and is allowing access to 26,000 emails regarding business deals. Should be a bad week for Joe Biden. Ask yourself why the campaign called a lid on Biden until Thursday.

    The reality is that these corrupt dealings are par for the course among DC elites. The Clintons, Bidens, Obamas, Pelosis, Cuomos, etc… Their cronies and spawn get these sweetheart deals. Chelsea Clinton had no redeeming qualities that made her special enough to obtain lucrative positions. Neither did Chris Cuomo or Mika Brzezinski. There are plenty of power couples in DC where one partner is high up in govt and the other in media or lobbying. All of it entails cronyism, nepotism, conflict of interest and concentrates power towards one ideology. It’s a replication of the Soviet Nomenklatura.

    1. “Ask yourself why the campaign called a lid on Biden until Thursday.” Debate prep. Ask YOURSELF why none of those you named has ever been charged with a crime, even when the GOP swamp holds all the levers. it’s sad you can’t see that it’s the Trumps who are going to end up in jail.

    2. Little late to field two new candidates DNC. Bidenon the ropes and Kamala unable to take the oath of office IF she’s elected.The first sentence would make her a felon.

  14. Joe Biden is wearing two masks on his face now. Joe Biden is scared to death of getting Covid.

    Joe Biden’s campaign has called a lid until Thursday when old Joe will only show his face again at the final debate, but not before. Joe will be avoiding press all week under the excuse of prepping for his debate performance.

    Joe Biden can and will get away with this because he has a corrupt lying press in his corner running cover for him.

    Joe Biden can hideout in his house for the remainder of the week, refusing to answer a single question about any of this corruption scandal, because he has a corrupt press covering up for him.

    Joe Biden can hide from any questions about this scandal because he has a dishonest corrupt Presidential Debate Commission suddenly changing the debate topic FROM FOREIGN POLICY back to Covid and Climate Change in order to hammer away at Trump on those topics.

    Changing the debate topic away from Foreign Policy so they give Joe Biden protection from answering ANY QUESTIONS about this scandal is completely corrupt and outrageous.

      1. We’ve seen no sign of non partisan and besides who would believe someone who never presents a fact or a source.? Who would attend something that has more changes than a merry go round? Get real commie.

      2. They are all anti-Trump, but anonymous feels it is safe to say bipartisan. All the interviewers chosen have been anti-Trump. The debate commission makes decisions in silence and I think it is safe to say that they have tried to hold back Trump while pushing Biden forward. The final debate discussion I believe has been altered. I thought it would all be about foreign policy, maybe I was wrong, but the commission will make sure discussion of the Biden computer will be hindered or eliminated.

        A real debate would be no moderator which made the last debate 2 on one. Look at the difference in the town halls. Trump was mostly interrogated by the moderator. Biden was mostly held up by the moderator.

      3. See Robert Dole’s remarks. He says he knows all the ‘Republicans’ on the commission and some are personal friends. And every last one is antagonistic to the President.

  15. Looked Ng at Adam Schiff’s face, he looks shifty. Would you hire him to fix your bracket o your car? Let him take your mail to the post office? Sell you a diamond?
    No way Jose.

  16. The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally may have spread coronavirus across the Upper Midwest: Within weeks of the gathering that drew nearly half a million bikers, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Minnesota and Montana were leading the nation in new COVID infections per capita.

    Trump is doing nothing to help slow the spread.

    1. Steve W. wrote, “The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally may have spread coronavirus across the Upper Midwest:”

      Claims about the Sturgis rally this year and the spreading of COVID-19 are false, last I heard they traced under 20 cases directly back to Sturgis rally, but hey there’s nothing to stop you from continuing to spread fake news.

        1. Gee Kurtz, I don’t remember any Intelligence Agency officials getting on national TV right before the 2016 election to corroborate what they already knew about the Trump campaign.

          Help me out on that, would you?

          1. You really should not worry. Hillary will win. CNN even has the data. Did you see this?

            /sarc

            New poll: Clinton leading Trump by double-digits

            Oct 23, 2016 / CNN

            Hillary Clinton has a 12-point lead over Donald Trump and has reached 50% support nationally among likely voters, a new ABC News tracking poll shows.

            1. Hillary DID win the popular vote, and the polls couldn’t take into account the cheating Trump accepted from Russian hackers.

              1. Yeah!!!! She won!!!! She won!!!! our girl won!!!!!

                Hillary, you lost, sweetheart. Stop trolling the internet with your “win”

                bwahahaahahahahahahaahaa

        2. “Biden corruption” is a product of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and the Trump campaign. We’ve been expecting the “October surprise” as a pivot away from the 8 million + positive coronavirus cases and almost 1/4 million deaths, but hey, Trumpy Bear said “we’ve turned a corner”–to where? Hell? No one believes this sh(t any more.

          1. The proof of Biden corruption is in your face and you ignore and deny it as expected.

            I was saddened to hear that Joe has dipped his beak in the corrupt schemes. I was genuinely hoping nothing would tie him to Hunter’s corrupt activities. but Hunter says he kicked the money upstairs and there’s elaboration of how the profits were shared, in detail. sad for Joe. I really loathe Kamala but I don’t hate Joe. Poor bastrd. Well Rich Joe but I mean you know, poor like sad

            1. Kurtz apparently got through law school without any sense of how to evaluate “evidence”. He’s accepting unauthenticated evidence which does not say what he claims. Assuming it is authentic – which no one in authority has said – there is no evidence a meeting took place with a Burisma guy – the email can be read as either a thank you for a real event or a thank you for a promised (by Hunter) future event. The China money plan does not actually name Joe Biden and as far as this “evidence” shows, is a plan without any evidence that Joe knew anything about it.

              You’re welcome Kurtz. I hope you have someone to help you in court.

                1. Thanks for your surrender Kurtz.

                  I’m glad we agree that whether authentic or not, the “evidence” demonstrates no proof that Joe participated in the activities Hunter allegedly organized. Unlike Jared and Ivanka’s corrupt behavior while in the WH employ, we don’t know if any of this ever happened, and in both cases we don’t know if Trump or Joe Biden were involved.

                  “A real estate company part-owned by Jared Kushner has received $90m in foreign funding from an opaque offshore vehicle since he entered the White House as a senior adviser to his father-in-law Donald Trump.

                  Investment has flowed from overseas to the company, Cadre, while Kushner works as an international envoy for the US, according to corporate filings and interviews. The money came through a vehicle run by Goldman Sachs in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven that guarantees corporate secrecy.

                  Kushner, who is married to Trump’s elder daughter Ivanka, kept a stake in Cadre after joining the administration, while selling other assets. His holding is now valued at up to $50m, according to his financial disclosure documents.

                  Cadre’s foreign funding could create hidden conflicts of interest for Kushner as he performs his work for the US government, according to some ethics experts, who raised concerns over the lack of transparency around the investments….”

                  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/10/jared-kushner-real-estate-cadre-goldman-sachs

                  Ivanka received favorable business rulings from the Chinese while in the employ of the WH.

              1. don’t worry, i’m just a nobody. it hardly matters what happens to me, just another native born white goy from flyover. we don’t count, see?

      1. Take notice Book Joe has nothing to say about the Hunter Biden corruption emails evidence because they’re authentic.

        And the Democratic leadership playbook says “ignore”

    2. Did you expect him to tell everybody to stay home? if you expected that then you need to understand that this falls under the government of the state of South Dakota. Ergo, the Governor.

    3. Any comment about the Womens Marches all over the country this past weekend? Thousands gathered …. is that a superspreader event? Or just certain ones?

    4. “Trump is doing nothing to help slow the spread.”

      What do you think Trump can do more than he has done? Biden/Obama failed miserably with H1N1 based on the way Trump is being rated. Had H1N1 been more lethal, under their watch we could have lost millions.

      The Trump response:
      *He pushed a vaccine ahead by several years something I personally would not have believed before Trump
      *He produced PPE, ventilators etc. that were left lacking by the previous occupant of the WH.
      *No one died for a lack of a ventilator despite all the previous claims we heard.
      *He built hospitals and provided hospital ships that Cuomo didn’t use and instead helped kill perhaps tens of thousands of nursing home patients.
      *He warned us years ago about permitting our industry going abroad especially China who holds the grip on PPE, pharmaceuticals etc. that Democrats complained about while they shipped these industries abroad.
      *He shut the nation down to traveller from China (and later Europe). Biden and the Democrats opposed such action.
      *He shifted from government agencies to the private sector to get a lot of this stuff done. The prior administration wanted more bureaucracy and that would have delayed everything Trump did that is considered a success.

      What Trump didn’t do:
      *He was accused of being a dictator but instead of being a dictator appropriately followed our federalist principles of giving the states control though he substantially helped out as seen vividly in NT. Biden on the other hand has stated policy that was wobbly and sometimes dictatorship like
      *He didn’t panic the nation as stated in the Pandemic book the left often talks about. Democrats have been panicking the nation to such an extent that even a good vaccine might be refused by those most in need.
      *He tried not to permit the economy to fail something I don’t think Democrats could do. Democrats were more interested in ideology than in helping the individuals in need. Thus they would spend on the Green New Deal rather than people.
      *He didn’t put us back into the stone age era something Democrats want to do though at times they deny it and at other times they don’t.

      Steve W., enough of your playing at the sidelines to take a bite here and where the bites conflict with one another. Let’s hear what your plan or the Biden plan is. Try and be slightly detailed like I have been even though I left out loads of things.

      (I’m leaving out the very important part that respiratory viruses do what respiratory viruses do. That has been discussed over and over again.)

    5. So far you didn’t mention anyone of value but when you are pig headed about a non existent freedom given the same uniform same language same mode of transportation same everything one is more inclined to see them as jack booters of the Third Reich .No signs of freedom at all none.

  17. The sad thing is if Trump loses all the investigations will.end and the investigations will end and the Democrats will have gotten away with the coup and ruining the lives of people like Michael Flynn.

      1. Whoever is elected hopefully there will be new investigations of Anonymous and his many criminal acts. Namely non stop BS with no proof.

      1. “for some goddam reason” because they’re making stuff up and feeding it to you. For some goddam reason you’re buying. Your all powerful very accomplished leader has yet to FULLY corrupt the justice system, despite his hundreds of water carriers in DC (aka, the swamp)

      2. How about the crime presently being committed by Comrade Pelosi trying to force the US Government to ok the DNC starving a bunch of school kids and younger to death. Then comes the whine… Well he could have given in to black mail and allowed illegas to get incentive checks Really You Socialists know where to find them to deliver the checks? Knowingly harboring criminals? Pelosi is a felon pure and simple.

    1. Bingo. And I have posted two articles from the Wall Street Journal that fully back this up in each one has said if the president loses this election you can forget about ever finding anything out. “ The day after President Biden is sworn in this investigation will be thrown into the dustbin of history“

    2. Regardless of who wins the investigations will end.
      In the case of Biden there is not much to investigate anyway. What this shows is corruption but its not a form of corruption for which anybody ever gets charged. Its like when politicians get paid huge sums of money for making empty speeches to large corporations. The corruption is obvious but nobody will ever go to jail.

Leave a Reply