California Teachers Trigger Free Speech Debate Over Antifa and Gay Pride Flags in the Classrooms

Two California teachers are under investigations in separate incidents involving classroom flags and videos this month. Government teacher Gabriel Gipe is under fire for boasting about his flying an Antifa flag at Inderkum High School and explaining that he has only “180 days to turn them into revolutionaries.” That controversy comes just days after another California teacher, Kristen Pitzen, boasted how she removed the American flag because it made her uncomfortable and replaced it with a gay pride flag.  She laughed how students were then left to say the pledge of allegiance to the gay pride flag at Back Bay High School in Costa Mesa. Both raise similar issues of when free speech is not a complete defense for educators.

Pitzen is now under investigation by the school district and has been removed from teaching. Here is the video:

 

As for Gipe, he proclaims that he is a radical and is seeking to radicalize students.  His display of the Antifa flag is clearly political and many of us view the group as a violent movement targeting academics and others with campaigns of intimidation and threats. Gipe posts pictures on social media proclaiming ‘F**k The Police” and says “probably as far left as you can go.”  he stated ”Like, why aren’t people just taking up arms? Like why can’t we, you know — take up arms against the state?” in the video posted by the conservative site Project Veritas.

Last year, I testified in the Senate on Antifa and the growing anti-free speech movement in the United States. I specifically disagreed with the statement of House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler that Antifa (and its involvement in violent protests) is a “myth.”  It is at its base a movement at war with free speech, defining the right itself as a tool of oppression. That purpose is evident in what is called the “bible” of the Antifa movement: Rutgers Professor Mark Bray’s Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook. Bray emphasizes the struggle of the movement against free speech: “At the heart of the anti-fascist outlook is a rejection of the classical liberal phrase that says, ‘I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.’”

Indeed, Bray admits that “most Americans in Antifa have been anarchists or antiauthoritarian communists…  From that standpoint, ‘free speech’ as such is merely a bourgeois fantasy unworthy of consideration.” It is an illusion designed to promote what Antifa is resisting “white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy, ultra-nationalism, authoritarianism, and genocide.” Thus, all of these opposing figures are deemed fascistic and thus unworthy of being heard. Bray quotes one Antifa member as summing up their approach to free speech as a “nonargument . . . you have the right to speak but you also have the right to be shut up.”

If Gipe expressed his views just on social media, I would be the first to defend him so long as he is not actually engaged in radicalization efforts through his public school position.

We have been discussing the investigations and terminations facing teachers over their expressing unpopular viewpoints on social media. Schools on both the high school and college levels are engaging in more monitoring of social media by students and teachers. I often defend such educators for views that many of us find offensive or even hateful as the exercise of free speech. I have defended faculty who have made similarly disturbing comments “detonating white people,” denouncing policecalling for Republicans to suffer,  strangling police officerscelebrating the death of conservativescalling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements.

The views of Gipe are not uncommon. For example,  University of Rhode Island professor Erik Loomis, who has defended the murder of a conservative protester and said that he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. (Loomis also writes for the site “Lawyers, Guns, and Money.”)

Teachers routinely voice opposing views in favor of Black Lives Matter or against white privilege. Indeed, we previously discussed a professor to warn K-12 teachers that their social media postings would be monitored for any pro-police or anti-Black rhetoric to hold them accountable.  Yet, we have seen terminations or investigations of teachers and public employees for denying that the United States is a racist country, deny Canada is a racist country, or calling BLM protesters “terrorists.

These two teachers however are using their positions for political purposes and advocacy.  The more serious case is that of Gipe. The Antifa flag is a clearly radical political symbol being displayed by a teacher who admits that he is trying to radicalize students through his classes.

Pitzen is also at fault given her obvious delight in replacing the American flag and leaving students with the choice of pledging allegiance to her chosen flag. However, I do not view the flag in the same way as the Antifa flag.  It represents the movement for equal rights for the LGBTQ community. It can however raise difficult issues for students who have religious or political objections to aspects of LGBTQ policies. What is clear is that you cannot legitimately remove the American flag to leave your preferred flag as the only recognized flag for the class.  The problem is precisely the one that Pitzen relishes and celebrates on her video: she left the students with no alternative but to appear to honor her chosen flag.

There are often difficult cases where educators espouse views for a pedagogical purposes that are deemed biased.  Academic freedom often protect such discussions. Most of us try to be open of any bias while taking extra steps to present opposing views. Some however show a pronounced bias that can be viewed as pressuring students to parrot their views to succeed in their classes. These two cases present more clear cases, in my view, of crossing the line from academic freedom into open (and admitted) political advocacy.

66 thoughts on “California Teachers Trigger Free Speech Debate Over Antifa and Gay Pride Flags in the Classrooms”

  1. Good write up Jonathan. Teachers shouldn’t be recruiting students or trying to indoctrinate them into leftwing nor rightwing causes.

  2. Jonathan: Re: ANTIFA. You say “many of us view the group as a violent movement”. Who are the “many”? Most likely just you, other right-wing commentators and some Republican politicians who tried to blame Antifa for the violence on Jan. 6 at the Capitol. You are strangely silent when it comes to the real threat of violence in this country. Violence comes from the Proud Boys and other right-wing white nationalist groups–encouraged by Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson –the latter at Fox News who is calling for a “revolt”. Carlson is a big supporter of Hungary’s PM Victor Orban, the xenophobic, anti-LGBTQ leader who has suppressed the press and the courts. and endorsed Trump last year. Had the Germans united en masse to confront the Nazi Brown Shirts on the streets of Germany in the 1930s we might not have had to go through WW11 or the Holocaust.

    1. I am a Democrat living in a blue city and nobody likes far left or far right extremists.. Why try deflect blame in this case? ANTIFA is just as nutty as the far right. They cause violence and chaos and there are many videos \ news of it.

    2. Dennis,

      How true. Turley will not dare comment about his colleague Tucker Carlson whether praising the illiberal Democrat and autocrat Orban or giving a platform to the Trumpist views of Ted Nugent who Turley has called in the past a “true lunatic.”

      It just goes to show how Turley has become captured by his employment at Fox. He is not willing to jeopardize his job by taking a stand against the rage that its prime time hosts fuel in this country. He will never be able to justify his silence.

    3. Dennis the manace ; The VAST majority of Americans view antifags as the human debris they are. The riots , the arson , the violence. And to what end …Their love of anarchy , chaos , violence and marixims to bind their brand together. So yes they are viewed for being the dimwit violent rubes they are. They are the Nazi brown shirts of your nightmare….because they are intolerant and it’s their way or violence !. Are you too silly to admit the obvious , or are you just down with the sickness ?.

  3. Both of these teachers seem passionate about teaching in general — and students who have/had access to them would be the better for it if we’re talking about having an educational experience.rather than just partisan scorekeeping. Look, just in the last couple of days students have been exposed to the second largest state making abortion functionally illegal and the repub minority leader threatening communication companies if they surrender basic records around the Capitol riot. Kids are being asked to accept a lot of norms being crushed these days. Not to mention some of them having governors actively dismantling health protections for them in school from a pandemic and school shootings.

    This one’s best left for the academics to finger pop their butts over at the post grad level as Rome burns.

    eb

    1. Eb,

      What are the odds that Turley will ignore the Texas abortion controversy? That’s a delicate issue for him should he opine that the Texas Legislature was flagrantly violating Roe v. Wade. Similarly, it remains to be seen whether he will continue to ignore Trump/Fox’s Big Lie by refusing to pass judgment on McCarthy’s outrageous threat to punish any communication company which follows the law in submitting to Congressional subpoenas in its investigation of the 1/6 “desecration” of the Capitol to echo Turley.

      If past is prologue, we might expect Turley to post some trivial criminal or freedom of speech case instead of taking a public stand on these pressing controversies.

      1. Agreed, Jeff. My guess is we’ll be treated to a handful of ‘academic tyranny of the left’ forays in the next days although it’s getting harder for Turley to split hairs in this non nuanced climate!

        eb

        1. Eb,

          Attacking MSNBC- his employer’s chief cable rival- and repeating for the umpteenth time his criticism of Antifa instead addressing the novelty of McCarthy’s threat! Then again, he is a lawyer for the Republican House so I suppose it is no surprise he would keep silent. I hope that I am misjudging him, but I am slowly beginning to agree with your take on him.

      2. You gave me a great laugh at your redundant hypocrisy here. You battle cry about abortion and allege Texas is spitting in the face of baby killers….. and yet you your senile pet baizou biden directly spits on the consititution…and for the most part he has got his senile butt checked on these attacks on the constitution…… but you ignore sleepy creepy joe and his handlers doing such….down with the sickness you are.

        1. Phergus,

          When you are prepared to admit that Trump is a pathological liar, I will gladly admit that Biden is senile.

          Fairer than that I can’t be.

    2. Another elvis insect screed of his left bent. These “teachers” are in now way passionate about teaching. They have an agenda…a perverse political agenda. That agenda includes indoctrination to become leftist revolutionaries…from their own mouth breathing rants. And you apparently are a baby killer supporter – my body my choicer – yet you would demand people get the toxic biden jab…hypocrisy much ?.

  4. The only way to stop this nonsense is if these ‘teachers’ – and the administrators who encourage them – lose their jobs.

Leave a Reply