Twitter Temporarily Blocks Florida Surgeon General In Sharing New Risk Data on Vaccines

Twitter Logo

This morning I ran a column on a proposed “First Amendment model” for Twitter once Elon Musk takes over the company. Right on cue, Twitter supplied another example of its corporate censorship culture that must be addressed if Musk is going to restore free speech protections to the social media company. Twitter temporarily removed a post from Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo recommending against mRNA coronavirus vaccinations for men under 40.

Dr. Ladapo was sharing data that he said indicated an increase in cardiac conditions for men under 40 who have received mRNA coronavirus shots. Rather than allow experts and citizens to debate such risks, Twitter moved to prevent others from hearing from the top health official in one of the largest states in the Union. It was later restored, which is in sharp contrast to other experts and science writers suspended or barred due to their raising dissenting views on the social media site.

In his post, Ladapo linked to new guidance from his office recommending against the shots for under-40s and wrote

“Today, we released an analysis on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines the public needs to be aware of. This analysis showed an increased risk of cardiac-related death among men 18-39. FL will not be silent on the truth. Studying the safety and efficacy of any medications, including vaccines, is an important component of public health. Far less attention has been paid to safety and the concerns of many individuals have been dismissed – these are important findings that should be communicated to Floridians.

Twitter immediately took the post down as violative of its coronavirus misinformation policies. It was later restored after public outcry.

It is not clear if the restoration would have occurred for other doctors given the past suspension and barring of experts questioning the efficacy of masks or vaccines. Even senators like Rand Paul were banned by companies like YouTube for questioning the efficacy of masks — a view now accepted as a legitimate concern.

The company seemingly wrote off free speech years ago. Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal was asked how Twitter would balance its efforts to combat misinformation with wanting to “protect free speech as a core value” and to respect the First Amendment. He responded dismissively that the company is “not to be bound by the First Amendment” and will regulate content as “reflective of things that we believe lead to a healthier public conversation.” Agrawal said the company would “focus less on thinking about free speech” because “speech is easy on the internet. Most people can speak. Where our role is particularly emphasized is who can be heard.”

I have written about five steps that Musk can take to restore free speech. However, the key is to break a culture of censorship at the company. If Musk moves Twitter out of San Francisco, it may help in that restructuring in replacing staff with those committed to free speech values. However, the key to restoring these values is to adopt what I have called the “first amendment model” for the company.

 

168 thoughts on “Twitter Temporarily Blocks Florida Surgeon General In Sharing New Risk Data on Vaccines”

  1. 50/50 chance of a Nuke War any moment now, Millions Dead from Big Prama’s Bio-Chem Weapons, Pedo Freak MD Docs cutting off lil Boys Balls & lil Girls Breast….. Don’t worry yourselves about any of that because another Kangaroo Court has Alex Jones’ & Infowars supporters 1st/2nd amendment Rights on the Ropes for Reporting the News & Opinions!!!!!!!!!!

    For a Billion Dollar Judgement!

    Great Job Dick of Du Nang Blumental.

    LOL:)

    https://www.drudgereport.com/

    **********
    One Million Dollars – Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (2/5) Movie CLIP (1997) HD
    1,186,648 views
    May 26, 2011

  2. FDA, CDC, NIH, Fauci’s NIAID, HHS & other Big Phrama are Still Hiding Info about CV19 & their mRNA Gene Therapy Clot/Deaths Shots & other works from their 100’s of Illegal Bio-Chem-Weapons Labs!

    Why are they Hiding the Autopsy that were done?

    **********

    Health
    FDA Withholds Autopsy Results of Those Who Died After COVID Shots
    by Marco Cáceres | The Vaccine Reaction.org
    October 10th 2022, 3:07 pm

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-withholds-autopsy-results-of-those-who-died-after-covid-shots/

  3. CV19 mRNA Clot/Death shots.

    Full on Genocide!

    More Dead then the 8 million White Christians & the 3 million Jews Hitler’s Nazis killed in WW2.

    *************

    Analyst Estimates At Least 20 Million People Have Been Killed By The Covid “Vaccine” Already

    39,448 views
    Oct 11, 2022
    29
    Share
    Download
    The American Journal
    The American Journal

    Analyst Estimates At Least 20 Million People Have Been Killed By The Covid “Vaccine” Already

    https://banned.video/watch?id=6345b7942c33134ae393bd44

  4. The new shot, a combo of the old and anti omnicron has only been tested on 6 mice which showed an antibody increase which is meaningless. Okayed with zero human trials. One of them is 15 grams each of the former and new dev, and the other is 25 grams each (Moderna). Good luck. Pray you don’t get a fresh vial. Heat and oxygen compromised shots degrade quickly and will be heading toward inert and less harmful and non deadly.

  5. The “new data” is so cherry picked and without context that it would be considered academic fraud in any other context.

    1. “The “new data” is so cherry picked”

      If that were the case you would have specified the data. By not doing so you have told us you are full of hot air.

  6. The human race is F kd and it is because of disinformation like this. Vaccines work. Period. COVID was bad. Wait until another (more) deadly virus comes along. Read some good research, not this BS. In Bangladesh they did a large study on wearing masks. In 2020 two cities were chosen, One was encouraged to wear masks, the other not. Guess which city had a higher death toll? Of forget that crap, you idiots don’t believe in masks. But yes, the city that wore masks had few deaths, significantly fewer. Or how about a study showing death rates with how people voted in 2020 for President. Yep, Trump voters died at a much higher rate.

    You don’t believe in masks? Next time you go to the operating room, tell the Doctors and nurses to please not wear a mask. Why do they wear masks in an operating room anyway?

    What a bunch of idiots. Wouldn’t be so bad if you only killed yourself. Unfortunately you spread it to immune compromised people and kill other people.

    It was a great day several times in 2020 and into 2021 when several high profile anti vaccine and anti mask radio hosts and “religious” leaders died from COVID. Served them right.

    We’re F kd.

    1. I’m glad to hear those 2 mRNA clot/death shots & plus the 14 boosters shots are working out well for you & I even see today in the news Moderna is now coming with a shot to fix up that lil mRNA Autoimmune Reaction Caused Myocarditis problem they are reported to be having.

      So anyway, now that you’re all good to go, there’s a lil job you could lead for all the DC War Whores. It seems Putin & his damned Ruskies sent missiles up all you’re Ukrainian Nazi Govt/Troops tailpipes so they need someone like you to lead a large convoy of Semi Dump Trucks to replace all of the Ukrainian Rainbow Unicorn Dildos that were destroyed.

      Best of luck! 😉

      **********

      https://rumble.com/v1nghdm-salty-cracker-russia-unleashes-a-wave-of-missile-strikes-across-ukraine.html

    2. “Vaccines work. Period. COVID was bad.”

      There’s far too much of this kind of politically motivated, simple-minded, uncritical thinking on the left.

      Imagine saying that “it was a great day” when ones political opponents “died from COVID”—the level of self-righteous hate required for this kind of thinking is truly frightening.

      1. Those who were/are anti vax and are “leaders” in any sense of the word, are responsible for every death they caused by those who followed them in their madness to not get vaxed and ultimately died. No sympathy at all for the idiots that proudly proclaimed how smart they are and would not get vaxed, only to die from the disease the vaccine was there to protect them from.

        I have no doubt we will see a resurgence of diseases that were once thought extinct due to the anti vax movement. Just wait til your kid comes down with Mumps because you didn’t trust the vaccine. Complications from Mumps can kill. How about Polio? Chicken Pox?

        The repo crowd has become a death cult. Repos died at higher numbers than Demos due to COVID. Pretty smart group you are Rs.

        The idiocy of the Rs is truly amazing.

        1. Baby, Your brain is in a propaganda scramble. They got to you good. Btw, a vaccine did not end polio. They just told us it did. The polio vaccine actually gave polio to about 50,000 kids! It was an enormous scandal. Look up Bernice Eddy. Same as it ever was with these people in power. You sadly have put your trust and faith in a shot, in big pharma, in Fauci, in the government. The rest of us put our faith in God….not an experimental injection that does not even prevent transmission of covid. So what *does the shot do? They say it prevents serious disease and death. Really? Show us the studies that prove it. You can’t because there are none. You are being lied to.

          The unvaxxed are going to save humanity. But sadly, you won’t be around to witness it.

        2. Edumacate yerself, Baby.

          Bernice Eddy, the Cutter incident, Dr. Alton Ochsner. Polio is still around, it just gets called things like transverse myelitis or poliomyelitis. Cases of TM are showing up as adverse events from the covid shots…health officials deny it is caused by the jabs, yet it is suddenly appearing after the patient takes the jabs. Imagine that.

  7. Open letter from The BMJ to Mark Zuckerberg:

    ,,, In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites. …

    https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80
    ——–
    This is the type of information that has been censored by those with little or inadequate medical and scientific training. Science progresses when ideas are challenged.

    I wait for Svelaz or ATS to deal with these ideas, but they can’t because they do not believe in science, instead believing in the repression of ideas that conflict with their Cosmic Vision.

  8. The ACLU uses the metaphor of “poison gas” when warning of the dangers of censorship. Many voters support censoring opinions they disagree with until the wind changes direction. Then your speech gets censored.

    For example: although well-meaning, censoring violent content could censor everything from Clint Eastwood movies to rap music to censoring the King James Version of the Bible.

    Why not just trust the American people to self-govern?

  9. Almost 3 years ago Prof Boyle warned us all about Fauci & Crew’s Bio-Weapons/ mRNA…..

    ***********

    UN Treaty Creates Medical Dictatorship Under Biden

    333,813 views

    Oct 3, 2022
    96
    Share
    Download
    The Alex Jones Show
    The Alex Jones Show

    Prof. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to expose the medical tyranny under Biden being created by a UN treaty.

    How to be a true rebel, a true anti-establishment warrior – dress nice, challenge establishment tyranny, expose eugenics, and go viral doing so.

    Left-wing radicals are attempting to destroy Alex Jones via the court system! Please help Alex by making a donation to his legal defense to keep him in the fight! Don’t let the NWO be successful with their latest weapon against Free Speech!

    https://banned.video/watch?id=633b50a511fd4f36d303cbdc

  10. The “study” is hilariously bad science and just more conservative virtue signaling. Put aside your political persuasion for a second and seriously ask if we should make public health decisions based on non-peer reviewed studies with sample sizes in the 10s.

    1. and seriously ask if we should make public health decisions based on non-peer reviewed studies with sample sizes in the 10s.

      Didn’t we do just that by granting Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines? The public heath recommendation from the Florida Surgeon General is informing the public of potential risks. Ultimately, it’s up to the individual to have the discussion with their doctor on vaccine’s risks and benefits. Don’t agree with the study or the subsequent recommendation? Then ignore it until all the peer-reviewed studies with sample sizes in the 1,000’s finally roll in. Boost away.

      1. “Didn’t we do just that by granting Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines?”

        Uhh no? The EUA that the FDA granted was based on peer reviewed studies with tens of thousands of participants.

        The Florida Surgeon General shouldn’t be in the business of putting out naked political nonsense which could negatively impact the health of the state’s citizens. A medical recommendation from the state’s top medical executive should have, ya know, some actual medical backing to it (as revolutionary as that statement seems to be).

        1. Are you an idiot ATS? We have heard only one side of the story, and that side has been wrong many times. Presently the Florida Surgeon General provides an analysis, which will eventually be proven correct IMO, and he isn’t removing the vaccine or banning discussion of what he advises. He tells people to do what they think best making them aware of alternate information.

          You are a real fascist dictator…”do as I say or we punish you and do not search for any information but what we provide you?” Can’t you see how fascist-dictatorial you sound?

          1. You’re a real idiot… “Agree that my medical pseudoscience has validity or you’re a big meanie fascist!” Can’t you see how idiotic you sound?

            1. You are an idiot ATS. There is a reason for the research to focus on cardiac deaths. A 10 to 30 times increase in cardiac events post-vaccination in young males is of tremendous significance. Once that occurs, it is imperative to look for deaths. When there is an 84% increased mortality, the death rate becomes even more significant combined with the other knowledge.

              Your stupidity arises because you are trying to prove a point, so you brainlessly attack singular pieces of data without looking at the rest of the data. You do this all the time and make a fool out of yourself.

              Ask a researcher trying to get approval for a drug if the study would continue when the incidence of adverse cardiac events increased by 10-30 times and if further studies (despite low numbers) showed a death rate of 84% higher than expected. The study would be stopped and reevaluated to find unrelated causation before resuming.

              That you choose to look so ignorant to prove a point is baffling.

        2. Isn’t it 95 Percent of Americans now what No Part of CV19 mRNA Booster Death Shots!!!

          You American Hating Aholes have lost control of the crowd & with your illegal Bio-Weapons having harmed-k*lled so many friends & relatives of Americans you people might consider what Benito Mussolini & other Tyrants should have done differently for a better outcome.

          The Florida Surgeon General can back up his case, what do you people have? Nothing but injury & death do I see from you!

          *************

          https://thelibertyloft.com › 2022 › 07 › 22 › dr-deborah-birx-i-knew-shots-would-not-prevent-covid-infection
          Dr. Deborah Birx: I knew shots would not prevent COVID infection
          Jul 22, 2022Dr. Deborah Birx: I knew shots would not prevent COVID infection by Art Moore July 22, 2022 in Opinion Defenders of federal officials, including President Biden, who declared one year ago that people who received the COVID-19 vaccines would not contract the disease argue “the science” changes over time.

          https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Jul+22%2C+2022Dr.+Deborah+Birx%3A+I+knew+shots+would+not+prevent+COVID+infection+Posted+on+July+22%2C+

        3. The EUA that the FDA granted was based on peer reviewed studies with tens of thousands of participants.

          Tens of thousands? Peer reviewed? Gosh, weird that an EUA was even necessary. Dr. Robert Malone surely gave it a positive review. Right?

          Now, this is Florida’s Surgeon General making recommendations for his state. If you don’t like them, then don’t take them. If you don’t live there, then GFY.

          1. “Tens of thousands? Peer reviewed? Gosh, weird that an EUA was even necessary. Dr. Robert Malone surely gave it a positive review. Right?”

            So evidence means something when it’s a non-peer reviewed study with sample size 20 and the opinion of one aggrieved researcher? But not when the evidence is peer reviewed with 30,000+ participants and includes the vast majority of the medical community and mRNA researchers? You can’t have it both ways.

            “Now, this is Florida’s Surgeon General making recommendations for his state.”

            As a public official and the top medical executive of his state, the Florida Surgeon General is obligated to make recommendations based on sound medical evidence. If you don’t agree with that basic tenet, there’s nothing left to discuss. It could be that further research bears out bad effects from receiving the mRNA vaccines. But this flimsy study is not a smoking gun, hell it’s not even a gun.

      2. Ultimately, it’s up to the individual to have the discussion with their doctor on vaccine’s risks and benefits.

        Ive had the opportunity to ask two different MD’s and their RN’s who took my vitals and any change in history, about the booster. All four failed to answer any of my concerns. All four had not taken anything but the third poke. All four said the CDC is making the reccomendation, but its up to me. None would make the recommendation to me. Me=overweight male age 65. No other co-morbidities.

        The notion that any healthy person under the age of 50 takes a dose of a treatment that accomplishes nothing, is nuts.

        1. Your diet has infinitely more of an effect on your heart than a vaccination does.

        2. The notion that any healthy person under the age of 50 takes a dose of a treatment that accomplishes nothing, is nuts.

          Sounds like you had an informed opinion they wouldn’t confirm or deny. My point was you had the freedom to choose, as opposed to being denied options.

          1. Olly, I guess, my point, the medical community is acutely aware of all the lies the CDC and FDA pushed, and have abundant experience treating covid patients. Asking question and listening to their responses informed me. But. Most people do not have much contact with a medical professional. That is the vast majority, and they are stuck listening to propaganda pushed 100% by the “narrative” team in the White House.

    2. “Put aside your political persuasion for a second . . .”

      You raise some good questions, but that is not one of them.

      The Left, e.g., Fauci, has been leading with its political persuasion (a desire for obedience and control) since this pandemic started. And it is primarily the Left that uses Covid as a cudgel to usurp rights and to destroy lives and businesses.

      The call now to put political persuasion aside is a bit hollow.

  11. Lots of nit picking on the Florida Position.

    The facts, those of the age class, birth to 18 are of almost zero health risk from covid. Excluding, those with very well understood, enumerated
    co-. morbidities.

    That translates into a recommendation to avoid taking a treatment that does not protect from contracting covid (a sars virus that has never successfully been addressed by any vaccine) nor stop the spread of the infection. In short, a treatment that does literally nothing, is a greater risk than benefit.

  12. We already know that covid is likely more dangerous than nuclear war. The same people who accused people of killing grandma for refusing to wear a mask in the grocery store in 2020 are nonchalantly talking about the desirability of a nuclear exchange.

    From the Huffington Post and therefore an authoritative voice from the left.

    Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-war-global-warming_n_828496

    Just waiting for the first s@@tlib to say this is a great idea and if you disagree you are an extremist threat to “Our Democracy ™”.

    antonio

  13. That’s weird, is Svelaz going to claim Denmark, Sweden and the UK are overpopulated with ignorant MAGA supporters too?

    Florida is not alone in their guidance. Sweden recommends against Covid mRNA vaccines for children ages 5-11. The Danish Health Authority recommends against Covid mRNA vaccines for children under 18. The UK has rolled back their offering of Covid jabs to children ages 5-11, per guidance from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.
    https://thepostmillennial.com/florida-surgeon-general-covid-mrna-vaccine-found-to-cause-84-increase-in-death-for-men-ages-18-39

    1. Wow. Love the logic. “Florida is not alone in their guidance” not to recommend vaccines for men aged 18-39 because certain European countries restrict vaccines for children aged 5-11.

      The issue is that this “study” is a joke. Can you tell me the names of its authors?

      1. The issue is that this “study” Twitter ban is a joke.

        No, the issue was the temporary ban on Twitter. They reversed that decision. In your experience as a medical professional, what about the study is a joke? Perhaps you could email or call the Florida Department of Health and get that vital “author” information you seek.

        Contact:
        Communications Office
        NewsMedia@flhealth.gov
        (850) 245-4111

        1. Obvious issues:

          1. It was not peer reviewed.

          2. Who conducted the study? The authors are not even named.

          3. They designed the study to compare incidence of death during the first 28 days “post-vax” to “later periods” up to 25 weeks. However, individuals who died in the first 28 days are not removed from the denominator in the second time period. How many people do you know can die twice? The effect is that it underestimates the risk in the second time period because it assume that people in the first time period are still able to die when they cannot.

          4. How are they assessing cardiac-related deaths? They apparently looked at death certificates and any death that had an ICD-10 code under “other forms of disease.” Two problems with this. First, ICD-10 codes are not necessarily accurate or specific. They are used for billing. Second, there isn’t a clear rationale to include these specific ICD-10 codes and leave out certain other cardiac-related codes. They include cardiac arrest, but that could simply mean the heart stopped due to any number of non-cardiac issues. Overall, it is a random, incomplete list defined not by a hypothesis, but by the arbitrary structure of hospital billing.

          5. No verification of diagnoses. They didn’t verify ICD-10 codes by looking at medical records. The anonymous authors actually note this in the “limitations” section. Namely, they “cannot determine the causative nature of a participant’s death. We used death certificates and not medical records. COVID testing status was unknown for those who did not die of/with Covid. Cardiac-related deaths were ascertained if an ACME code of I3-152 were on their death certificate, thus, the underlying cause of death may not be cardiac-related.”

          5. Covid Confounding: In the methods section, the authors mention the exclusion of people with COVID on their death certificate, and they also say they excluded people with a documented COVID infection. This makes it sound like they had data on who had tested positive for COVID, right? But later on, they say COVID testing status was unknown, and the only info they had on COVID status was based on the death certificates. So they didn’t know whether or not people had COVID, unless it was listed on their death certificate. In short, because immunity from the vaccine doesn’t develop on day 1 after vaccination, susceptibility to COVID itself confounds this analysis. For this study, a dive into medical records would be warranted for many reasons, including to know whether or not people had tested positive shortly before they died.

          7. Small sample size: There were only 20 deaths among males aged 18-39 who had received an mRNA vaccine. This sample size is not large enough to draw strong conclusions.

          1. The sample size is plenty big enough if you are one of the deaths. You are defending a losing cause. However, if you are Dimunist, that equates to 20 more votes for your feral Party of criminals. So jab, jab, jab away, snowflake.

            1. Sure. Their deaths should not be forgotten. But that doesn’t mean the statistical study can gain any meaningful information from such a small sample size.

          2. Notice that they have made recommendations, as opposed to bans, like we saw with HCQ. Ultimately, they said the following:

            Floridians are encouraged to discuss all the potential benefits and risks of receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines with their health care provider. The risk associated with mRNA vaccination should be weighed against the risk associated with COVID-19 infection.

          3. So you have an interesting rebuttal.
            The solution, according to you, is to silence all the dialog in favor of ONE position ONLY. That position, approved by the Party in power.

      2. What is being called a study by anonymous was referred to as an analysis studying, ““Today, we released an analysis on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines the public needs to be aware of. This analysis showed an increased risk of cardiac-related death among men 18-39. FL will not be silent on the truth. Studying the safety and efficacy”

        Anonymous has trouble assembling facts or cannot express himself correctly with the appropriate details to describe what he is talking about. An alternative is he is a liar.

        1. What? The link provided by the FL Dep’t of Health: https://floridahealthcovid19.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221007-guidance-mrna-covid19-vaccines-analysis.pdf

          If you actually clicked on the link, the title is: “Exploring the relationship between all-cause and cardiac-related mortality following COVID-19 vaccination or infection in Florida residents: a self-controlled case series STUDY”

          If you have a link to some other “study” for which the link above is just an analysis (whatever that means), please post a link!

          1. That is an integral part of Turley’s essay that you can read for yourself above.

            “What? The link provided by the FL Dep’t of Health:”

            You are trying to obscure what has been said by hiding your words under what constitutes a lie. Your reference to this link doesn’t exist on this page. There was a reference to it on the preceding page but written under another name. We know that you use multiple names and icons, but I think in this case, the poster of the link is a different poster than you.

            You act surprised which also falls under what constitutes a lie because you know exactly why I said what I did, and are trying to reconstruct what was said to promote what constitutes a lie.

            In Turley’s essay, the Surgeon General refers to the discussion as analysis, that is studying. If you were honest, you would recognize we are discussing that point of view, not the other. Again, since you do this knowingly, what you have done constitutes a lie.

            In sum, I think what you are doing is constitutes deceit which is a type of lie.

            1. 1. Click on the hyperlink provided by Professor Turley in the article above embedded in the words: “new guidance from his office recommending against the shots for under-40s.” That will take you to the Florida Surgeon General’s posted health bulletin.

              2. Click on the hyperlink embedded in that health bulletin in the first paragraph under “analysis.”

              That takes you to the link I provided above (and will also provide again here: https://floridahealthcovid19.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221007-guidance-mrna-covid19-vaccines-analysis.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery).

              What am I hiding? There is no deceit or lie. This is what was posted by the Florida Department of Health.

              I apologize profusely for thinking that readers of the Professor’s blog have enough interest to actually research the issues about which he posts. This did not take all that much work. 2 embedded hyperlinks. Perhaps that is my mistake for thinking readers on this blog are (or wish to be) informed.

              (Finally, this delineation between “analysis” and “study” seems to be really getting people worked up. If y’all have a link to some other guidance from the FL Department of Health, please post it. This is literally all they have shared. Frankly, if an “analysis” is somehow less in-depth than a “study”, and an “analysis” was actually relied upon for making this recommendation, it should be even more concerning.

              1. You are such a deceitful individual. It is non-stop. I referred to Turley’s essay including the quotes used, and not to the links. You are trying to salvage a reputation that doesn’t exist.

                So what does the link lead us to?

                “Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an analysis…”

                Note the word analysis which is in the document you referred me to. Be careful about using the word study when it isn’t applicable.

                At the end of the report, it says, “The analysis can be found here. The guidance can be found here.”

                Take note, again, of the word analysis. Your problem ATS is you are dishonest, and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

                “I apologize profusely for thinking that readers of the Professor’s blog have enough interest to actually research the issues about which he posts.”

                Cut the snark. You are the king of links and the king of not knowing what many of those links say.

                You have made so many dishonest statements today that I figured it best to start labeling you with the name that best suits these discussions, ATS.

                “and an “analysis” was actually relied upon for making this recommendation, it should be even more concerning.”

                You don’t know what you are talking about. Doctors analyze the data before treating their patients. They may not run studies on patients, but they analyze them in multiple ways. They might write their analysis in their note, they might have grand rounds specifically for the analysis of a problem, etc. Lapado made himself perfectly clear.

                1. S. Meyer you moron, he literally TOLD you how to get to the actual analysis that the FL department of health used to arrive at it’s recommendation. You go off ranting about links without every going further than actually hitting the link and see for yourself what he is talking about. Use, Your. Brain. S, Meyer .

  14. Twitter is essentially a kind of animated message board. We’ve had message boards on the internet for many years. The problem with Twitter may have begun when it became a kind of quango. For me, I’m also not comfortable with a foreigner running an American-based company in direct conflict with our values. Sure, it’s a discretionary issue, but we rightly or wrongly expect it to reflect our American values. Years ago, NJ Chief Justice Wilentz wrote an interesting opinion about shopping malls which tried to prohibit the distribution of political brochures. Although they were private property, they were funtioning as a kind of public square.

  15. The rest of the so-called developed world (EU, UK) has recommended against additional shots for anyone under 50 with a few named co-moribidity exceptions. Did they get censored?

    1. Please find me a definition of “developed world” from this millennium that excludes Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.

  16. Svelaz is already up to about 30 comments on this one story and it appears as though the guy needs a hobby. Or maybe, just maybe, Svelaz is another one of those paid trolls that makes a poor living being a toady for Biden and the Democrats. Either way he should be embarrassed.

    If we could get one particular “Anonymous” and Svelaz to just shut up for a minute this comments section would be so much better. It is great that people can comment and others can rebut or argue against that comment, but do we realy need one person trying to dominate the site. Hey Svelaz, you are a typical mansplainer trying to bully everyone off this platform. Think about shutting it down just a tad to give us all a break from your constant whining against everything the host stands for. Go to another site, one that you may agree with once in awhile.

    1. Hullbobby, you’re advocating for censorship? Seems like you are. It’s you are keeping track of how many posts I make I wouldn’t be making remarks about needing a hobby.

      Funny you don’t complain about George who is much more prolific at posting comments than anyone else.

      I’m just putting my opinion and rebuttals like everyone else. If you don’t like how much I’m posting you are free to ignore me. Why are you advocating for censorship Hullbobby? I thought this was a free speech supporting blog.

      1. No.

        Svelaz, writing your multitudinous responses, you have discovered something that makes you different from everyone else. You find that blog interaction is a substitute for sex. Sex doesn’t require intellect, nor do your blog postings.

Comments are closed.