Professor Sundiata Cha-Jua, a prominent history and African-American studies professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, is under fire after using racist slurs to describe Georgia Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker. While the racist attack has drawn criticism on conservative sites, there has been no opposing statement or protest at the university. The media has also been largely quiet. The contrast to past controversies involving conservative faculty members again raises the concern over a double standard applied by colleges and universities as well as the media. Thus far, the response to the use of racist slurs or tropes against Republicans has been the familiar sound of crickets.Cha-Jua wrote in The News-Gazette Walker is “incompetent, subliterate and coonish.”
Recently, Walker was subjected to a racist attack on MSNBC by regular guest (and writer for Above the Law and the Nation) Elie Mystal. MSNBC never apologized to Walker or affirmed its opposition to such racist commentary.
The column was an attack on Black Republicans who Cha-Jua refers to as “MAGA Black White supremacists.”The column seems to follow a pattern among Democratic politicians in attacking Black and Hispanic voters who are shifting over to the GOP. President Biden was ridiculed for declaring “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”
In his highly offensive column, Chu-Jua compares a Black Republican candidate Terence Stuber to a slave serving white masters: “And like the incompetent, subliterate and coonish Herschel Walker, Stuber reiterates ‘massa’ Trump’s talking points.” Stuber is running for Champaign County Clerk.
The lack of any protest or statement at the university is another example of how such controversies are handled when they involve faculty on the left as opposed to right. There are relatively few conservative or Republican faculty at most universities today, but the response to any such controversial statements is often immediate and overwhelming.
I have defended faculty who have made similarly disturbing comments “detonating white people,” abolish white people, denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer, strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements. I also defended the free speech rights of University of Rhode Island professor Erik Loomis, who defended the murder of a conservative protester and said that he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. (Loomis was later made Director of Graduate Studies of History at Rhode Island).
Even when faculty engage in hateful acts on campus, however, there is a notable difference in how universities respond depending on the viewpoint. At the University of California campus, professors actually rallied around a professor who physically assaulted pro-life advocates and tore down their display.
When these controversies arose, faculty rallied behind the free speech rights of the professors. That support was far more muted or absent when conservative faculty have found themselves at the center of controversies. The recent suspension of Ilya Shapiro is a good example. Other faculty have had to go to court to defend their free speech rights. One professor was suspended for being seen at a controversial protest.
I would defend Cha-Jua’s right to speak despite his offensive rhetoric in any effort to fire him. Yet, such language should be condemned. A professor used openly racist slurs to attack African Americans running for office and the silence from the university and the faculty at Illinois is perfectly deafening. The contrast in these cases is glaring and chilling. The professors and pundits who have written hair-triggered columns or tweets are notably silent when the racist attack is directed against Black Republicans or conservatives.
The response explains the sense of fear and intimidation for some faculty in speaking out on campuses. There is a general view that a conservative or dissenting faculty member will be given little quarter or protection in any controversy. Given the relatively small number of openly conservative or Republican professors left on many faculties, the chilling effect is perfectly glacial.
I wonder if there would be the same reaction if someone attacked Warnock in a similar fashion?
Can one of our leftist moral bettors explain? I am a deplorable and in need of guidance.
For some reason s@@tliibs are able to attack Hispanic Cubans in a similar manner.
Guidance please!
antonio
Relax … Wednesday morning (Nov 9th, 2022) starts with a new Dawn.
It’s going …: I’m afraid the “new dawn” is going to look a lot like the old dawn even if Republicans win the House and/or Senate. We saw how Democrats strangled government for 4 years with their fake Russia collusion narrative and impeachments. They can do as much damage in the minority as in the majority. Most likely, they will keep up their 24/7 hate campaign and bring it to the streets. Then, the only way to restore order and safety will be to unleash the law & order forces, which will then trigger a backlash from the people. It will be a setup from day 1, and government will again be paralyzed.
Antonio. You wanna know something crazy? What the professor did was not a racist attack. It was not even close. Turley is just being disingenuous as usual with his characterizations of what these articles say. Maybe you should try reading the whole thing before calling it an attack.
@svelaz
THANKS for the reply. As one of my leftist moral bettors, I appreciate your superior guidance. Help me with this one. I am Cuban, my family left the “worker’s paradise” in 1961 and I am attacked from time to time for my beliefs. This would never happen to a Mexican American or Puerto Rican. Why is it ok to attack Hispanics who drift from the leftist plantation but not other more complaint ones?
Please help!
And calling me a slur is not an answer.
antonio
Lamentablemente, Svelaz es una nena, no tiene cojones debido que su madre se los corto pensando que era travestí cuando nació. Por lo tanto, tú puedes imaginar lo confundido que se siente la nena. Es decir, debemos tener misericordia por el, ella y sus otros pluscuamperfecto pronombres
translation: we love you too, Svelaz
Svelaz, what part of using the word coon to describe a black man do you not understand. You understand full well and you are alright with it.
I mean if we’re going to bring up “crickets” on controversies, why hasn’t Turley even mentioned the attempted murder of Paul Pelosi? One would think that an attempted kidnapping of the Speaker of the House of the United States, and the associated incendiary rhetoric that prompted it, would be a more relevant topic than Herschel Walker’s hurt feelings. Maybe because it doesn’t play into conservatives’ bottomless feelings of victimhood?
I think Turley has talked a lot about crime and people being assaulted because of leftist defunding the police. What aspect of leftist criminal activity do you think he missed?
I mean this is my point. Turley has an endless appetite for blogging about any petty spat, no matter how minor, against Republicans but doesn’t discuss a violent attack on the household of the person 3rd in line for presidential succession and the leader of one of our two federal legislative bodies? It undermines his credibility as a dispassionate legal writer rather than a partisan hack churning out conservative grievance porn.
There is nothing special to write about when a violent drug addicted, mentally ill illegal alien left wing nut attacks Paul Pelosi.
Most people are intelligent enough to grasp that DePape is nuts and has been left nuts nearly all his life.
Is there more to this ? Maybe – lets hear the tape, and see the assorted video.
Until then this is speculation. Lots of it.
Anonymous, so you think that using a racist slur is a petty spat. Is it a petty spat when a professor who is responsible for teaching our young people describes a black man as a coon. It must not be your kid that he is teaching so you just don’t give a damn if your desired result is achieved. Spoken by a true Machiavellian.
Anonymous: Every politician who commented on the Pelosi attack, from both parties, condemned it. But here’s what Democrats never condemned: the attempted assassination of Justice Kavanaugh; the violent attacks on churches and pro-life clinics; and the numerous attacks, egged on by the likes of people like Mad Max Waters, on Republican congresspeople. In this election cycle, I counted three Republican candidates so far who have been assaulted or had gun shots fired into their homes. Crickets from the left — where the real “incendiary rhetoric” is coming from. Or maybe you’ve missed the recent airings of CNN and MSNBC?
Is there some issue regarding the mess at the Pelosi home that requires Turley’s comment ?
So far there are lots of questions, lots of misinformation from all sources.
About the only thing fairly clear is DePape has serious issues.
I would like Turley to say that the police should release the 911 call and the body cam video.
That would end lots of questions.
We shoudl also see the security cam Video at Pelosi’s home.
All of this would settle lots of questions.
But there are no special legal issues.
DePape is likely to get slammed far worse than say John Hinkley,
Because shooting a president is so much less consequential that psychotically ranting to kneecapp the speaker of the house if she lies.
why hasn’t Turley even mentioned the attempted murder of Paul Pelosi?
Attempted murder? According to NBC. Pelosi opened the door for the cops, and then went back to talk to his friend with the hammer. Sounds much more like suicide than murder. Most people would answer the door and hide behind the cops. Lots of contradicting facts in play.
You mean the one, where Paul Pelosi opened the door for the Police, but then returned in his underwear to grab the hammer the Illegal alien, BLM loving attacker was holding at the time?? That one??
Inane comment. The Paul Pelosi event has a whole lot of loose ends, such as exterior door glass being broken outwards and the hammer attack not occurring until after the police arrived.
Nanny Peeloosi and the communists (liberals, progressives, socialists, democrats, RINOs, AINOs) CREATED the celebrated, derelict, dependent, parasite ilk, one of whom allegedly attacked her husband, who may have allowed the potentially “false flag” perp in, as was done on Jan. 6, or been as high as a kite.
EQUITY PRECLUDES RACISM
Professor Sundiata Cha-Jua is racist, inequitable, anti-American and a direct and a mortal enemy of the Constitution, America and Americans.
Professor Sundiata Cha-Jua et al. must not be tolerated and must be opposed.
The Constitution provides equity, while the infinitely implacable Professor Sundiata Cha-Jua demands super-constitutional bias, partiality and favoritism, nay, superiority.
Legislation has established the age of maturity for the purchase of alcohol to be 21; certainly the vote should be provided only to definitively mature citizens.
The age to vote must be 21, not 18; it is preposterous to believe that all grievances, real or imagined, enjoy resolution.
Action must be taken to assure the equity and rationality of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court recently acted retroactively by 50 years to strike down wholly unconstitutional Roe v. Wade and return the legality of abortion to the States, per the Constitution.
The Supreme Court must now act retroactively by as many as 150 years to strike down the 26th Amendment, the “Reconstruction Amendments” et al. and return equity, elections and vote criteria to the States, per the Constitution.
The Supreme Court must exercise its power of Judicial Review for the benefit of the Constitution, as Chief Justice Roger B. Taney * valiantly attempted in 1861.
Equity is the absence of bias or favoritism; the 26th Amendment and “Reconstruction Amendments” are injurious to the essential equity in the Constitution, and must be struck down.
Equity is innate in the Constitution; fundamental law does not need to be parsed or “injuriously” altered with reference to equity.
Democracy was created with vote restrictions in Greece and perpetuated as such in Rome and America; never was democracy conceived to be of one man, one vote, and absent criteria.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“…OF SUCH A NATURE AS WILL NOT INJURE THE CONSTITUTION…”
”And if there are amendments desired, of such a nature as will not injure the constitution, and they can be ingrafted so as to give satisfaction to the doubting part of our fellow citizens; the friends of the federal government will evince that spirit of deference and concession for which they have hitherto been distinguished.”
– James Madison, Proposed Amendments to the Constitution, June 8, 1789
____________________________________________________________
*
“…RESISTED BY A FORCE TOO STRONG FOR ME TO OVERCOME.”
“The clause in the Constitution which authorizes the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is in the ninth section of the first article. This article is devoted to the Legislative Department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the Executive Department.”
“I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power.”
“I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power has been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome.”
– Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, May 28, 1861
“This is not a democracy. Everybody doesn’t get to do what they want to do. Everybody doesn’t get to do what they feel like doing.”
– Nick Saban
___________
“[We gave you] a [restricted-vote] republic, if you can keep it.”
– Ben Franklin
Shades of Mandela’s Xhosa conflict with Zulu and native South Africans caught in the middle. Diversity is a color judgment, class-based bigotry, including racism.
C’mon Turley. Do yourself and the world a favor and tell everyone you’ve become a conservative. How ’bout a conservative Christian? Do it…
Nah, he’s just a liberal who hates how illiberal the left has become. Truly does a fantastic job highlighting the grotesque nature of the modern left.
Ivan,
I disagree.
I think the professor who is a traditional Democrat, is trying to point out how the Dems party have become so infatuated with far Leftist ideology, and corruption.
As he should.
@randy
Just waiting for the first s@@tlib like yourself to call JT a ‘nazi’ too.
antonio
Walker is coonish like Clarence, Scott and so many others in the history of this country. That is not a racist term. That is the truth. Not because he’s waving the GOP flag as his party – it doesn’t matter his political affiliation- what matters is who he shows himself to be. A liar, coon and shuffling fool.
To Willie any black man who’s reached or is reaching for success that won’t bow down to the masters on the left is a coon. To willie every white man is just a cracker. Joe Biden excepted. Willie has to throw in a “shuffling” step and fetch it for good measure. Next he will tell us that walker will be dancing with Shirley Temple. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wtHvetGnOdM. How dare this man “shuffle” with a white girl. Racism comes in all colors as attested to by Willie’s comment.
‘coon’ ish is an Appalachian endearment for a ‘racoon’. e.g. ‘chase that rabbit, chase that coon, chase that pretty girl around the moon.’
Clarence ‘the mute’ has found tongue, but I continue to believe Obama the biggest Uncle Tom of them all. Clean cut, articulate and personable .. . and the greatest waste of political talent in my life.
Obama is the reason we got Trump and Trump is the reason we got Biden and Biden is the reason we’re all going to hell in a hand basket. .. at least thats’ the way I see it.
*i hear Clarence is itching to revisit ‘Sullivan v New York Times’ .. . one of Prof Turley’s favorite torts.
Are you jealous that they left the Progressive plantation you are stuck on/?
Here’s a story from the Washington Post about a man who frequently appears on MSNBC. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/08/01/al-sharpton-is-not-lifelong-fighter-justice/. These people think it’s okay to call Walker a coon or Thomas a house N-word but they celebrate a known Anti-Semite sitting on their opinion panel. Then they have the gall to call Republicans bigots. They are trying to maintain the black vote and they will do anything and everything to do it. They say that they hate hate but they stir it up everyday. Now that their losing some of the black vote and much of the Hispanic vote the screeching from the true haters just gets louder and louder.
There is an old game played in the South and in some places in the Midwest where people will put on their deepest accents in a business discussion especially if face to face. People from outside the area usually assume that they are stupid hicks with no education. Just a bit of advice. Hold on to your wallet because that is a simple mechanism to lull you into making a very stupid decision. It worked exceptionally well in the south when dealing with yankees new to the area or passing through. Once the victim departed accents often reverted back to the usual and understandable. It was hysterical to watch it in action and I often had to walk away so I could smile and laugh and not give away the negotiation. I am sure Mr Walker was very well understood by the people watching the debate no matter what their accent. On the other hand when HRC used a fake southern accent in the south in 2016 she just offended people. They already knew what she really sounded like. Bill could get away with it (from Arkansas) but not her.
Aren’t you a democrat??
Academia has become a big pus filled ghetto of daily Democrat intolerant verbal violence, that bursts into literal violence if black conservatives show up to speak. Just ask Candace Owen or Allen West.
The Svelaz Bot is working overtime today. A few more lines and it might start blowing a CPU. We should only hope.
Let us all give thanks that we have been spared from being like Svelaz, and remember him in your prayers tonight.
GEB,
I find it more amusing that he writes entire paragraphs, and no one reads them.
I dont.
Same goes for Dennis and Natacha.
They post something boorish, I just scroll past knowing full well what they spew is nonsense.
The fact they spend so much time and energy for comments no one reads has to be frustrating to them.
Kinda like ignoring a petulant child. The more you ignore them, the bigger the tantrum they throw.
I wouldn’t be making claims that no one reads everyone’s posts. Everyone reads them. Otherwise they wouldn’t be posting in response. Even your own posts are skipped, but it is guaranteed that George’s posts a are the ones everyone really ignores since he posts the longest ranting posts. How do we know? Nobody mentions him at all.
Or there is little to argue about.
With a few exceptions where I have pointed out that George is wrong – such as his constitutional error regarding birthright citizenship,.
George for the most part pretty accurately describes the constitution as it was written.
Unfortunately SCOTUS has mucked that up considerably, and George is constantly attacking things that are just not going to change.
Social security is unconstitutional. But not even Thomas is going to rule against it.
I rarely argue with George because though he is right, we are just not going back to the constitution as it was written.
I would note SM makes the same point in comments to me all the time.
We are not reversing Wickard anytime soon.
We are no returning to the contracts clause anytime soon.
That does not mean I am wrong.
It just means the road to restoring the constitution is near impossibly steep.
…yes.. for pure entertainment nothing beats svelaz… like watching cartoons when you were little…
GEB, I”m no bot sweetheart. But think George is. He posts far more than I and he is much more unhinged.
Everyone thinks their political party is the best. They believe anyone who votes for a different party is voting against their own interests.
Such rhetoric can easily devolve into pure hatred and tribalism. For example, Sunny Hostin on The View called women who vote Republican as cockroaches voting for raid. Democrats like Cha-Jua denounce black conservatives with blatantly racist slurs like “coonish”, or that they call Trump “massa.” Many call blacks who refuse to vote for Democrats as Uncle Toms or Step ‘n Fetchits, or House (bad word).
Yet we’re supposed to believe the Democrat Party is the Party of civility, tolerance, and stands against racism. Right. They also have a time share to sell you.
Do you remember when a vote for Obama would stop the seas from rising? All Climate Change problems would go away because people voted for Obama. Yet, there was AOC claiming that we had 12 years left to stop Climate Change or the world would be over.
A vote for Joe Biden would return us to civility. Are we civil now? Are Democrats polite to Republicans now?
Do you still believe these people?
A vote for Joe Biden means that: 1. the voter supports a woman’s right to choose, based on the Constitutional protections of liberty and privacy; 2. the voter believes in democracy, as opposed to 300 some-odd Republicans running for office who are election deniers and who have pledged to flush votes they don’t like; 3. the voter does NOT want Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid and food stamp programs to be curtailed or ended as Republicans have promised; 4. the voter does not want the wealthiest individuals and corporations to get even more tax breaks, but instead, believes they should pay their fair share of the tax burden;5. the voter wants the US to continue its trajectory of growth brought about by Democrat policies, including reduction in prescription drug prices, corporations and wealthy individuals paying their fair share of taxes, continued cooperation with our EU and NATO allies, reduction in our dependence on fossil fuel and free and fair election.
It is truly laughable that you, Karen S., a deep-seated Trumpster, would accuse anyone of lack of civility. Your hero insults anyone and everyone who does not fall down in worship to him, including members of his own party, world leaders, and Democrats. You ask whether Democrats are “polite to Republicans”? What Democrats have been impolite to Republicans?
Dang, not only did Gigi drink the kool aid….she drank the whole quart!
Hey Gigi, you like the Washington Post right? Here’s what the Post had to say about Republicans wanting to cut Social Security and Medicare. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/. Now please tell us how the Washington Post gets it wrong. Just because it resides in a little cubby hole in your mind it doesn’t make it real. Do you really fall for every scare tactic that they put in your in box. Sure seems like it.
Here’s the truth:
This week, The New York Times looked at what the GOP might actually do on Social Security if they do indeed regain Congress next year.
Republicans, the Times said, “have embraced plans to reduce federal spending on Social Security and Medicare, including cutting benefits for some retirees and raising the retirement age for both safety net programs.”
The argument, per the piece, is that cuts are necessary to reign in spending.
The story specifically referenced Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), who has said more than once that he would like to subject Social Security to reauthorization on an annual basis, rather than funded by a formula, as it currently is.
This plan was assailed by former President Barack Obama during a recent campaign visit to Wisconsin.
Obama said that recipients “had long hours and sore backs and bad knees to get that Social Security,” and that “if Ron Johnson does not understand that — if he understands giving tax breaks for private planes more than he understands making sure that seniors who have worked all their lives are able to retire with dignity and respect — he’s not the person who’s thinking about you and knows you and sees you, and he should not be your senator from Wisconsin.”
In addition, per the Times, “several conservative Republicans vying to lead key economic committees in the House have suggested publicly that they would back efforts to change eligibility for the safety net programs.”
You have one quote from Johnson that does not say what you claim.
Regardless, spending is going to be cut.
There really is no choice anymore.
You can not tax more. There is no more tax income to be had. We are very close to the revenue optimizing tax rates.
You can not print money – the consequence of that is inflation.
Without the Fed to buy Government debt by printing money. the government will have to pay market interest rates
Which will make the problem even worse.
The only answer is to cut spending.
I welcome your suggestions as to where to cut 2T out of the federal budget.
Gigi: LOL. Yes, we all know the NY Times is the word of God. But on a saner note: how does one square “belief in democracy and the Constitution” with the massive censorship campaign the Biden administration is engineering with social media? Or the administration’s weaponization of the FBI, DHS and IRS against US citizens? Or the many racially discriminatory laws Biden has tried to push through, but were thankfully stopped by the courts? This administration has zero respect for the Constitution or for the American people — at least the half who don’t vote Democratic. You know, those “semi-fascists.”
Great point.
In addition, FJB sure did not care about a woman’s right to choose to reject a COVID-19 vaccination when he ordered all employers with 50+ employees to require employees to be vaccinated.
Gigi/Natacha:
Does Hillary Clinton not believe in Democracy because she said the 2016 election was stolen or hacked by the Russians? Is Stacey Abrams an election denier, because she said she really won the election? Is Al Gore an election denier?
Is every single prominent Democrat an election denier opposed to Democracy, who said the 2016 election was stolen, that Trump was an “illegitimate president”, or that Russia hacked the election?
Roe v Wade was not overturned because of any judgement about whether abortion was right or wrong, or at what gestational stage it should be limited. It was overturned because abortion was not a Constitutional right, and it skipped the legislative branch in violation of the balance of powers.
The abortion issue was sent to the states and federal legislative branch to decide.
I have never seen so many people vehemently repulsed by the idea of self governance.
Because Roe v Wade was overturned, NY and CA now have more permissive abortion laws than would have been allowed otherwise.
Most Americans actually believe there comes a time in the gestation where a woman’s “right to choose” ends. The clock runs out, and then the child has the right not to be deliberately killed. Polls overwhelmingly show this. Pro Life and Pro Choice are a range, not a binary.
Here in the US, citizens have every right to form their own opinions on the rights of pregnant women, and the unborn. They have every right to advocate for the individual right of the unborn, if they so choose. Until this becomes a fascist country, people will voice opinions with which you disagree, and they will vote on it. Voters in far Left bastions like NY and CA will collectively not care a hoot about the unborn, while more voters in more conservative states will care about both the unborn and the women who carry them.
Gigi/Natacha:
After having repeated the misinformation that Russia hacked the 2016 election for years after it was disproven, now you have pivoted to reciting the misinformation that Republicans want to take away or curtail Social Security and Medicare. Zero Republicans want to do this. It’s demonstrably false.
You also repeat misinformation that the rich don’t pay their fair share. The rich pay an enormous share of the taxes in the United States. To claim otherwise is to ignore all data. We have the most progressive tax structure in the world. The rich and the middle class pay for infrastructure and schools that everyone else uses.
https://taxfoundation.org/rich-pay-their-fair-share-of-taxes/
https://www.cnbc.com/2013/12/11/the-rich-do-not-pay-the-most-taxes-they-pay-all-the-taxes.html
“Buried inside a Congressional Budget Office report this week was this nugget: when it comes to individual income taxes, the top 40 percent of wage earners in America pay 106 percent of the taxes. The bottom 40 percent…pay negative 9 percent.“
Your hatred against successful Americans reeks of envy and anti-bourgeoise bigotry. It smacks of greed. You want what others have, and you want the power of the government to take it for you. You want the successful cut down to size. That might satisfy your envy, but we would have no more innovations like cell phones, personal computers, social media, or medical advances. Why would anyone create when the financial success is decimated by the greedy?
Who is more greedy, the person who wants to take what someone else earned, or the person who wants to hold on to what he or she has earned by their own effort?
Well done Karen. Not only did you almost single-handedly gut the troll Natacha from the blog, you’ve exposed the reincarnation of that troll now going by the ID Gigi. Bravo!
OK. Now I get it, my confusion vaporized.
NUT-GIGI!
Sheee’s baaack!
NUT-GIGI it is.
Karen S,
Well said.
Natacha’s follow on comment is a gross display of how delusional Dems have become and a rewrite of history.
It is sad to watch.
The question I have is how will they react come 9NOV?
Will the likes of Stacy Abrams, or Katie, I cannot debate, Hobbs, or “I don’t know why that’s so important to you.” NY gov Hochul concede if they were to lose?
Democrats have normalized racist slurs against black conservatives, and misogyny against female conservatives. These aren’t fringe lunatics on a subway platform, but rather prominent people who represent the poor values of the Democrat Party.
Parents, vote with your dollars. Do you want to spend your hard-earned money to send your son or daughter to a university where they will be taught that racist slurs against blacks are OK, as long as the blacks fled the Democrat plantation? Do you want your kids to learn to hate America, eschew working hard or being responsible, and to become entitled, emotionally fragile adults incapable of withstanding any stressor, let alone the sound of an opinion contradictory to their own?
Choose universities wisely.
Name some “Democrats” whom you claim are “normalizing” racism and misogyny. Can you? Name a single university that actually teaches that racist slurs are acceptable. Can you? You’ve never attended university, so Karen S., you really wouldn’t know what happens at a college, but you believe the alt-right media attacks on educated people. See, alt-right media know that their target audience is whites without college educations, who feel threatened by educated blacks and women, and who are vulnerable to all sorts of things like white replacement theory, fears about transgenderism, LGBTQ matters and geopolitics that they don’t understand. They villanize women like Nancy Pelosi, HIllary Clinton, AOC, and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and people like you fall for it.
Any democrat that does not condemn the language used by this “professor” or elie wyastsbag or whatever its name is is normalizing racism, so you for one.
Why is it the purview of a university to teach what is acceptable? Did your uni teach you right and wrong, Gigi? Mine didn’t. Moreover, your elitism is a lame appeal to authority, which my uni did teach was a logical fallacy – did yours? Alt-right media reaches more than uneducated whites, ask me how I know, ask my wife who was a rcoket scientist before becoming a MD. You think you’re better than people becuase you went to some shit uni and got a shit degree and have a shit job, yet you still think you are smarter simply because you played the college game – lol. Truly educated people realize the foolishness of your language. It is truly deplorable, btw.
Pelosi, clinton and ginsberg are not above reproach and the first two are scum of the earth, so falling for their goodness is the only fallacy there. ginsburg is a typical most-modernist liberal, yawn. We get it, anything can mean anything and the ends always justify the means. Gross.
Gigi: “Name some “Democrats” whom you claim are “normalizing” racism and misogyny.” All you have to do is tune in to CNN or MSNBC and listen to their stars like Sunny “white Republican women are cockroaches” Hostin; or Elie Mystal and Joy Reid. The network just fired Tiffany Cross for her racism. Seems like even MSNBC has some standards, albeit low. The evidence from academia can be found in Turley’s blog. When elites speak with one anti-white, anti-conservative voice, we’re on sound ground calling it “normalizing.” Your denial notwithstanding.
Gigi/Natacha, so many Democrats used racist slurs against Sen Tim Scott, R-SC, that “Uncle Tom” trended on Twitter.
You have a poor grasp of the truth, and instead rely on false propaganda. In fact, have quite a lengthy history of repeating false stories.
This article is an excellent representation of the left that today controls almost all of our institutions- extreme, unrepentant, unreasonable, and demanding of a double standard that is beyond childish.
Your didn’t read the article Turley was discussing in his column. So how do you know what Turley is talking about is really what the article was about?
Here’s the interesting part. Turley never mentions that professor Sundiata is a black man and so is Mystal who he mentions as another professor making racist claims. News flash professor Turley, They ARE professors of African studies and this is why the mainstream media is not being “outraged” by the professor’s article. They READ for COMPREHENSION rather than focus only on one sentence so they can scream “racism” like you or those on this blog losing their minds with plenty of manufactured outrage or just plain old fashioned ignorance because they didn’t read the entire article or don’t want to because all they need to know is that this one sentence is all the proof they need to justify their…”outrage” on the hypocrisy of the left that does not exist. They don’t have the intellectual capacity or the patience to UNDERSTAND what they are reading IF they actually try to READ the entire series or articles professor Sundiata wrote. Stupid people remain stupid when they refuse to read and learn.
LOL, we read. Unfortunately, the clown says nothing new, nothing insightful, and certainly nothing based in reality. “authentic African American defenders of Black folk’s interests and democracy”…lol
What’s he gonna say next? “I believe in science…” LOLOL. We know exactly the intellectual capacity necessary to process that garbage and then not critically think about it or open your eyes to the effects of black (any) democrat leadership. But you go on and keep proving the dunning-kruger effect and cheer for its other victims, we’ll be here watching and laughing and hoping you all get help – unlike the non-help you are doled by your democrat thought leaders, as if that was a possible thing.
Just like Svelaz to dismiss the word “coon” being used against a black Republican. If the word “Jap” or “Kike, or “Spick” is used to describe a Republican Svelaz would be all for it. Just because a person is Japanese, Jewish or Hispanic does it make it alright that they use racist slurs against people of their own ethnicity? Does it somehow give them a pass. I thought that hate was not to be allowed but it’s ok if it’s directed at people you don’t like says Svelaz. Making excuses for the inexcusable is his thought for the day. Are you going to vote with this bigot?
“ Just like Svelaz to dismiss the word “coon” being used against a black Republican. If the word “Jap” or “Kike, or “Spick” is used to describe a Republican Svelaz would be all for it. ”
No I wouldn’t be all for it. Don’t be a liar TiT. That just makes you look stupid.
Putting words into people’’s mouths is not a good way to portray yourself. I never dismissed the word. In fact I can guarantee that the majority of people don’t even know the word is racist. The only way people are aware of it is because conservative drama queens or Karens are screaming “racism” because of one sentence by a black African studies professor who was making a two part article on white supremacists in the GOP leadership and how they exploit minorities.
“ Just because a person is Japanese, Jewish or Hispanic does it make it alright that they use racist slurs against people of their own ethnicity? Does it somehow give them a pass.”
Yes, it does. Because they CAN use the terms when they are critical of one of their own. It’s racist when someone OUTSIDE their race says those terms. That is why its called RACIST. This goes to show just how deep your ignorance goes. You can’t be accused of being racist for calling another white individual a “cracker” The intent BEHIND the insult is racist when the person saying it is NOT of the same race and it clearly implores a racist intent behind the insult because the same insult would NOT apply to the person saying it.
If YOU called Hershel Walker coonish then THAT would have been racist. Besides “coonish” is so old and rarely used that even wordpress is not censoring it. But it will if you use ni@@er. Think about that.
You have dismissed the use of “coon”.
The rest is a reasonable inference.
coon” offensive —used as an insulting and contemptuous term for a Black person
Websters
“Yes, it does. Because they CAN use the terms when they are critical of one of their own. It’s racist when someone OUTSIDE their race says those terms.”
Nope, racist is racist. There is no inside or outside.
Words are either acceptable no matter who uses them, or they are unacceptable no matter who uses them.
It is not acceptable for black people to murder blacks.
It is called hypocracy when you do not apply standards equally.
A thousand words in an article does not excuse the use of word “Coon” when describing a black man. It’s even worse that a black man would describe another black man with such an expletive knowing the history of such a word. If you didn’t know the color of the person using such a word you would think that it was coming from a segregationist in the south in 1930. But it’s okay with Svelaz. “Coon” is just a synonym for the N-word. But it’s okay with Svelaz.
Here are a few excerpts for those who are too lazy or didn’t read the article in full. Just so what Turley and these “outaged” conservatives is put in it’s real context.
“ Part 2 contrasts Black White supremacists seeking public office with authentic African American defenders of Black folk’s interests and democracy. It focuses heavily on the race for Champaign County Clerk between incumbent progressive Democrat Aaron Ammons and his conservative Republican challenger, Terence Stuber.”
…” Today’s Black Republicans come in several shades. Some are legacies continuing a family tradition. Others believe a Black presence is needed at all tables. A meager few genuinely seek to extract the best deal possible for Black folk within a conservative policy framework. But probably most are truly MAGA Black White supremacists who pursue neoliberal policies despite their negative impact on the majority of Black people”
…” It’s contemptuous because Republican leadership recruits Black candidates mainly to run against Black officeholders. It’s cynical because Republican leadership is exploiting a profound irony — the more racially resentful anti-Black White voters are, the more likely they will vote for a Black conservative over a Black Democrat. Albeit the right-wing Black candidate must send the appropriate “conservative cues.”
Theodore R. Johnson, attorney and former speech writer for the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, identifies the necessary right-wing signals. He claims wearing MAGA paraphernalia or echoing Donald Trump’s lies questioning the 2020 election’s legitimacy send the right MAGA message. I would add demonization of African American protests against police abuse and explanations of poverty and crime that emphasize alleged personal attributes rather than structural factors.”
Sundiata is making a point that white Republican leadership is using these black candidates as a shield from being seen as racists. He IS talking about White supremacists in the GOP recruiting black candidtates who are either very gullible or are simply opportunists because it is easier to run as a republican. Context changes everything about what Turley is dishonestly saying about this article and it’s author.
The dude is not an academic, he is a apparatchik. He is simply a tool.
“authentic African American defenders of Black folk’s interests and democracy” lolol. Yes that perfectly describes black democrat leadership over the past 60 years…Does anyone simply ask…what have the results been and then look around? Apparently that is not the purview of that clown’s research.
Face it, who couldn’t do that guy’s job? We know exactly what he’s gonna say and do…he’s a typical moron. He’s the coonish one, like svelaz is here, daily. We know what you are told to think, I don’t know why you feel the need to prove us right every single day, but you do.
“ Face it, who couldn’t do that guy’s job?”
You couldn’t. That’s obvious.
“White man bad. black man voting for non-marxists bad. marxists all good, for now. Don’t tell me about facts/evidence/reality I’m still right”
That’s it, that’s all he does. even you can do it, oh wait, you do.
It is beginning not to matter what color one is. The far left has become a magnet for racism.
Svelaz wants to prove the racist speech by Cha-Jua isn’t racist. Perhaps it isn’t racist in the leftist lingo world, but hardworking people know racism when they see it. Cha-Jua is about as racist as they come.
As proof, Svelaz quotes: “the more racially resentful anti-Black White voters are, the more likely they will vote for a Black conservative over a Black Democrat. ”
That is broad-brush racism. Conservatives will vote for a conservative rather than a progressive without considering color. A chihuahua could figure that out. Why can’t Cha-Jua?
Anonymous,
“ Svelaz wants to prove the racist speech by Cha-Jua isn’t racist.”
If you actually read the both parts of the professor’s article you would understand that he was focusing on white supremacy and how their leadership within the GOP recruit black candidates to exploit and shield themselves from being perceived as the racists they are.
Your only excuse to call the professor’s speech racist is one single sentence and Ignore the entire context of the article.
The professor’s use of the term “coonish” is not racist. It can’t be. It would be if the processor was white, obviously he’s not. His intent behind using the term was obviously as an insult, but in the context of his article it was not as outrageous as Turley and some of the conservatives crying “racism” are making it to be.
All they are doing is manufacturing outrage over the fact that others UNDERSTAND what he was saying and the context of why he used that particular insult in that sentence. The word “coon” or “coonish” is so rarely used and so outdated that the majority of the media don’t pay much attention to it. Even WordPress is not flagging it for censorship like the word ni@@er. Conservatives are going stupid over a term the majority of people don’t even know is racist. But they sure are getting outraged at the fact that nobody is noticing it. Except the racists who KNOW what it means. How ironic.
“The far left has become a magnet for racism”, and they have trapped you completely so that I mostly skim over what you write and only occasionally respond. To be honest what I read from you is garbage that demonstrates no understanding of the subject matter or its history.
Cha-Jua is a racist and not very smart. His comments leave holes all over the place and rely on racists to agree with him. I skimmed a bunch of your other posts not reading most of them. They were awful.
“The professor’s use of the term “coonish” is not racist. It can’t be. It would be if the processor was white . . .”
Apologists sure are adept at linguistic contortions.
“their leadership within the GOP recruit black candidates”
Let’s take one black man. He was born poor and raised by an Aunt in Harlem. His youth was following a bad road. He looked towards the left for solutions. He found the solution in Marxism. By that time his life had already changed and he decided on his own to become educated. He got his degree and went on to obtain a PhD. His PhD paper was on Marxism. At one point he went to work for the labor department and tried to find out why certain things didn’t work.
Without the GOP recruiting hm he found that the Marxist solutions didn’t work and that a lot of people didn’t know what they were talking about. He studied other things than economics which is what his PhD is in. He became an expert on different cultures, racism, and society in general.
He is one of the most brilliant minds alive today who started in a slum and after embracing Marxism found it was a fools errand. He didn’t need the GOP to pull him to their side as your foolish statement suggests. He pulled some of the GOP to his.
Svelaz.. a ‘black white supremacist..?’ Which comic book company pays you to troll your insulting fabrications and absurd back-stabbings..??
Svelaz: It’s pretty clear you have never really looked at how the Democrats have never worked for black interests and democracy; have always cynically used blacks for their votes; and consistently deny agency to black voters. Democratic welfare policies since the 1960s, mandating single parent families as the criterion for family assistance, have destroyed the black two-parent family and made black women and children virtual wards of the state. They have also dismissed the black man as superfluous, leading to demoralization and increased criminal activity. All Democrats have ever offered blacks is more and more welfare — a trap that doesn’t seem to be working with other minorities. Hence we see Asians and Hispanics switching to the Republican party, along with black voters tired of being told they are oppressed, voter suppressed, incapable of getting a voter ID, or some other insult to their agency. It’s not the ones who change their political affinity when they see reality who are brainwashed and exploited by whites — it’s the ones who stay in the rut and perpetuate it who are the ones to pity.
Your examples do not help you.
First – any republican anywhere who ever once used the word “coon” to describe a black person would be labeled a racist – for life.
An NYT reporter was fired for repeating a question from a minority that included the N word.
But read your own post – Republicans are recruiting “guilible” minority candidates ?
How could you be more racist than to claim that – so Tim Scott is too stupid to understand that the GOP is using him ?
Ben Carson is guilible ?
Thomas Sowell is Guilible ?
Larry Elder is Guilible ?
We have seen this recent “Herschel walker is a stupid uncle Tom” argument
You want to defend the professors racism by proving it ?
Whether you like it or not – Minorities are fleeing the democratic party.
They are not doing so because they are stupid – but because they are smart.
Because democratic policies have harmed not helped them.
One of the big issues in this election is rising crime rates.
Some people who are not really at risk because of rising crime are being motivated to vote republican.
BUT the largest groups of people actually experiencing rising crime are minorities.
We saw a few minority voices speeking out in the midst of the BLM riots – because those riots destroyed minority communities and made life worse for the people who the rioters claimed to be trying to help.
But it has gotten worse – those communities suffered during the riots and they have continued to suffer since
from rising crime and reduced policing.
The Fact is that many minorities see the Democrats – and not just the far left – for who they are.
They have taken minority votes for granted.
But they have never actually done anything for those minority communities.
Democrats own the failed minority community schools.
While the only successful efforts to improve schools for minorities have been from Republicans.
Absolutely Republicans sought to impliment school choice to benefit they own constituencies.
But those policies greately benefited minority communities.
Accross the board – Democrats offer minorities a hand out, republicans offer then a hand up.
Prior to the pandemic – Trump’s policies had increased the income of the working class about 4500/year over 3 years.
Biden has cost those same families 3500/year.
Minorities moving towards the GOP are not guilible.
They are SMART.
And the Democratic Party is what has actually expected them to be guilible for years.
And that is what is being rejected.
Biden was elected – and implimented a raft of new policies.
Spent trillions of dollars
And NONE of that addressed anything that minorities actually care about.
None of that made their lives easier.
None of that addressed their concerns.
This realignment has been coming for a long time.
It was sped up by wise policies by Trump.
It was sped up even further by poor policies from Biden.
The guilible minorities are those that still beleive the stupid nonsense that democrats are shilling.
The shift of minorities from the Democratic party to the GOP started more than a decade ago.
It was inevitable. It mirrors the shift of every other past minority or immigrant group.
Initially at the very bottom of the ladder they are attracted to recruited by and tend to vote democrat.
But as their standard of living rises they increasing vote republican.
The standard of living for blue collar – mostly minority americans has doubled in the past 40 years.
And they are slowly shifting politically as a result – just as the catholics, the irish, the italians, …. all did in the past.
This was going to happen no matter what.
But Trump accelerated that shift – not by pandering to minorities – but by treating them like every body else.
By implimenting policies that were good for everyone – including minorities.
And Biden accelerated that move even further by implimenting policies that are bad for everyone – including minorities.
Republicans are not pandering to minorities – like democrats are.
They are not treating them as fragile inferiors in need of special protection.
Republicans are the Actual “anti-racists” – they are implimenting MLK’s dream.
They are putting forth policies that are good for everyone and everyone includes minorities.
Republicans are treating minorities as equals – actually blind to race.
Democrats remain fixated on race. They are the racists.
The racism this professor exhibits is going to increase – as the left seeks any explanation -other than the truth for why minorities are fleeing them.
Calling black candidates “guilible” – is calling black voters gullible. And that is racist.
As is typical Svelaz
If someone offers or you can manufacture and argument – no matter how absurdly stupid that favors the left and disfavors the right,
you will grab onto that argument and hold tight. Blind to its complete absurdity.
Minorities are shifting to the GOP, they have been doing so for most of the 21st century, but that move accelerated under Trump and accelerated further under Biden.
And instead of trying to figure out why minorities are abandoning the left, you and this professor respond by blaming minorities – that is racism.
By slurring them as a group – or atleast those who are leaving – that is racism.
Incapable of grasping that they are leaving because the left failed them,
you postulate they are leaving because they are guilible, stupid, uncle tom’s, being used.
That is racism.
It is not Trump or the GOP or MAGA that is racist – it is YOU, Democrats, the left.
There is another candidate on the ballot.
Chase Oliver is a “member of the Libertarian Party with a background in the import shipping industry. He says that he is running for office because he wants to be “a Senator that serves each and every individual, and not a political machine based in Washington DC. I want to represent you and not special interests which thrive on division, gridlock and partisan fighting. I would rather work for results.”
At this point, I would vote for a dead skunk in the middle of road not affiliated with Rs and Ds. .. if ONLY Ds and Rs can win it doesn’t matter how you count the votes.
*Snowden for President 2024 ‘I Used To Work For The Government’
Turley and to a broader extent conservatives and republicans sure love to manufacture outrage over the stupidest things. It’s evident that the majority of them including those here didn’t read the entire article Sundiata Jah-Jua wrote. It’s part two of a series of articles on white supremacy. It is virtually guaranteed that NOBODY here or those conservatives crying racism did not read for comprehension or context on what he was discussing in his article. The only thing they are focusing on is one sentence out of a very long article which pretty much avoids the basics of what READING an article is all about. The WHOLE article is there to provide a broader context on what he is saying. What is really crazy is that Turley does this on a daily basis. He too has these dog whistle articles or columns making or insinuating things that he wouldn’t be caught saying directly.
Manufacturing outrage is easy when you are only focusing on one word or sentence in an article that removes all context and depth of what the author is saying. That is called being disingenuous and dishonest. Turley certainly does a masterful job on that.
Turley didn’t bother mentioning professor Sundiata’s other important points that lend context on what he is talking about in his article.
“ What type of Black Republican is Stuber? He was recruited by White Republican leadership to run against Ammons, the only African American clerk in Champaign County history. Like Deering, “the hard, overt and aggressive” White supremacist, Stuber is an election denier.
And like the incompetent, subliterate and coonish Herschel Walker, Stuber reiterates “massa” Trump’s talking points. Intimating fraud, he cast aspersions on the 2020 elections. Stuber alleged votes were not counted in Georgia and Arizona, and further declared, “Champaign County may have stopped counting. I don’t know.” But during a late August interview with The News-Gazette’s Tom Kacich, he dissembled when asked if Trump had won. Again, disingenuously claiming uncertainty, he stated, “I don’t know if he truly was the winner.”
About a month later, similar to Walker and nearly all election deniers, “Stuber miraculously backtracked. Without explanation, he affirmed, “Joe Biden was legally elected president of the United States.” I find his reversal unbelievable. Indeed, I believe it’s a tactical move to deceive the electorate”
Context changes everything if you first READ the entire article before passing judgment and it seems Turley and others did just that.
Trump said to inject ourselves with chlorox right? or, Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from where she lived, Right? Here’s some black paint so you can start painting yourself.
Jim22. Let’s get the facts straight about your bleach comment. In April 2020, when nobody knew anything definitive about the Wuhan virus, a meeting was held at the White House to discuss recent research re killing the virus, The main speaker was William Bryan, acting head of the US Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate. The beneficial effects of heat, light and bleach in destroying the virus were discussed. According to the BBC, Trump mused:
“While noting the research should be treated with caution, Mr Trump suggested further research in that area.
“So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous – whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light,” the president said, turning to Dr Deborah Birx, the White House coronavirus response co-ordinator, “and I think you said that hasn’t been checked but you’re going to test it.
“And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside of the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting,” the president continued.
“And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? “So it’d be interesting to check that.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52407177
Obviously, Trump was thinking out loud, not suggesting that anyone inject Chlorox into their bloodstreams. Indeed, he said that the research should be treated with caution, Your distortion of this comment reminds us of the distortion of his comments on January 6.
Let’s get the facts straight about the Sarah Palin reference.
“Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin is still ridiculed for her claim, during the 2008 presidential campaign, that she could see Russia from her house in Alaska. But that sound bite never came from Palin. It was actually a Tina Fey line from a Saturday Night Live sketch, spoofing a Palin interview where she said, “You can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.” You could argue that this bit of cartographic trivia didn’t make Palin an authority on geopolitics, but it’s factually correct: Russia and Alaska are close enough to make eye contact. On a clear day, you could climb a hill on Cape Prince of Wales and maybe make out mainland Siberia, just fifty miles away.”
https://www.cntraveler.com/story/yes-you-can-actually-see-russia-from-alaska
He knew that. He was being sarcastic.
Riiiight, he was being stupid. What he did show was that he didn’t really understand what the scientists were talking about OR he wasn’t paying attention because he was really not interested in what they were saying.
What mattered was that when he was talking and saying really stupid $hit people listened to him and took it to heart that he was being serious. That led to people really considering and asking doctors if it was save to drink bleach or some disinfectant. The CDC HAD to issue a warning that doing that is NOT safe despite the president saying something to that effect. That is why trump supporters are a gullible bunch. They will believe anything that comes out of his mouth as the truth. That’s how cults are created.
Svezlaz – The bad advice that hurt people did not come from Trump, but from government bureacrats, media, and top democrats: close schools; close businesses; stay home and keep kids at home; trust in cloth masks; trust in untested “vaccines”; ignore the benefits of ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies, vitamin D and other traditional treatments; ignore people who question the orignins of the virus, ignore anyone challenging the official line (as it develops on a daily basis) concerning the virus, In one sense, like many Republicans, Trump was indeed “right”: he was uncomfortable with the damage to normal life caused by the “experts”.
🤣 The “context” you provided reminds me of this quote provided by Thomas Sowell in his review of Jason Riley’s book Please Stop Helping Us.
“Please do not do any more good in my country,” he said. “We have suffered too much already from all the good that you have done.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/07/please-stop-helping-us-thomas-sowell/
You’d be wise to quit while you’re behind. But since you’re not, you’ll just grab your shovel and continue digging.
Thomas Sowell was NOT what these black republican candidates are ad that is NOT why he meant in context to what Sundiata is talking about. You just proved my point, that the majority of people DO NOT READ FOR COMPREHENSION when arguing about these articles. All they focus on is that one sentence that allows them to justify manufacturing outrage so they can claim a grievance of hypocrisy from the left or a double standard.,
Sowell was referring to an entirely different issue that has absolutely nothing to do with what Turley is talking about.
You just proved my point, that the majority of people DO NOT READ FOR COMPREHENSION when arguing about these articles.
BS. Our reading comprehension proves you are this blogs Lying Troll.
Sowell was referring to an entirely different issue that has absolutely nothing to do with what Turley is talking about.
Duh! The point of including Sowell’s quote was directly related to your feeble attempt to deflect (cleanup on aisle 9) justifiable criticism away from the racist context of Sundiata Jah-Jua’s statements. You didn’t help; you highlighted it.
Olly says, “ BS. Our reading comprehension proves you are this blogs Lying Troll.”
And yet YOU didn’t read Sundiata’s two part article either. It’s so obvious.
Sowell’s quote had NOTHNG in common with what Sundiata was saying. I know because I READ both parts of Sundiata’s article AND the Sowell article. YOU clearly didn’t do that. To pretend you read both articles and not realize that Sowell’s article had a point in relation to Sundiata’s is proof that you didn’t read Sundiata’s articles. Don’t call people liars when you didn’t even read the article sweetheart.
You violent hate speech is hurting my feelings.
Incredible that you believe that reading the article; we did, and you have no idea you did or didn’t – yet you also believe you know who did and didn’t, because well, making shit up is really the only way for your imagined reality to be realized.
You and clown professor wish you were as subliterate as Walker, but alas you are worse, you are simply a mouthpiece, a NPC, a puppet regurgitating false realities presumably to distract you from the lies and bs and failures of your yesterdays.
The left, particularly the black democrat left has nearly nothing positive to show for its efforts over the past 60+ years, but it has created much devastation to its own and the larger community. They are pawns being manipulated by the lefty establishment, sad really.
Neil,
“ Incredible that you believe that reading the article; we did, and you have no idea you did or didn’t – yet you also believe you know who did and didn’t, because well, making shit up is really the only way for your imagined reality to be realized.”
it’s so obvious you didn’t read it. if you did what was the first part of the article about? It was a two part article what was the first about? I’ll wait.
Part 1 was his proving he’s an intellectual midget.
Part 2 was the inevitable emotional breakdown.
It sounds as if you are asking others to interpret what he said. Neil gave an appropriate summary, but you can quote an important and meaningful portion of the article and tell us what you think it means. It doesn’t look like you can, and this last response of yours sounds like a call for help.
Election denier?
Like Bennie Thompson?
“And like the incompetent, subliterate and coonish Herschel Walker . . .”
That’s amusing. Now do Fetterman.
The question is, who are you?
Actors Henry Fonda & Charles Bronson answer the question.
Great movie.
Of course, Professor Sundiata Cha-Jua is a hypocrtical racist. But these cretinesque tactics to divide people are a diversion from the important issue of how politics really works in America. Here’s a brief primer: