As I approached the start of my first-year torts classes at George Washington University, we have a rather intriguing tort action being threatened by the First Lady. Melania Trump has been pursuing media outlets claiming that she was introduced to or had close contact with the notorious Jeffrey Epstein. However, the latest recipient of a notice letter is none other than the son of the prior president, Hunter Biden.
The letter below focuses on two statements made by Biden in a video interview with Channel 5’s Andrew Callaghan, posted to YouTube in early August.
a. “Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep.”
b. “Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, that’s how Melania and the First Lady and the President met. Really? Epstein made the intro? Yeah, according to Michael Wolff.”
The First Lady’s counsel, Alejandro Brito, wrote to Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, that the statements are defamatory per se. The common law has long recognized per se categories of defamation where damages are presumed and special damages need not be proven. These include: (1) disparaging a person’s professional character or standing; (2) alleging a person is unchaste; (3) alleging that a person has committed a criminal act or act of moral turpitude; (4) alleging a person has a sexual or loathsome disease; and (5) attacking a person’s business or professional reputation.
It would be interesting if Hunter’s counsel claimed that the First Lady is technically a “public official” to trigger a higher standard of proof.
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court crafted the actual malice standard that required public officials to shoulder the higher burden of proving defamation. Under that standard, an official would have to show either actual knowledge of its falsity or a reckless disregard of the truth.
The First Lady has a federal budget, staff, and official duties.
In the end, it is likely a moot point since, even if she is not a public official, she is clearly a public figure.
The actual malice standard was later extended to public figures. The Supreme Court has held that public figure status applies when someone “thrust[s] himself into the vortex of [the] public issue [and] engage[s] the public’s attention in an attempt to influence its outcome.” A limited-purpose public figure status applies if someone voluntarily “draw[s] attention to himself” or allows himself to become part of a controversy “as a fulcrum to create public discussion.” Wolston v. Reader’s Digest Association, 443 U.S. 157, 168 (1979).
Brito is claiming damages of $1 billion notice over statements that are “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” made about the First Lady:
“These false, disparaging, defamatory, and inflammatory statements are extremely salacious and have been widely disseminated throughout various digital mediums. Indeed, the video has since been re-published by various media outlets, journalists, and political commentators with millions of social media followers that have disseminated the false and defamatory statements therein to tens of millions of people worldwide.”
In laying the foundation for reckless disregard of the truth, Brito is citing the dubious source for the information as “serial fabulist Michael Wolff, whose lies were published by The Daily Beast in the article titled ‘Melania Trump ‘very involved’ in Epstein Scandal: Author.’”
Wolff is highly controversial. We previously discussed how his sensational claims have been regularly challenged. That led to a rare rebuke from Special Counsel Mueller after the publication of his book “Siege: Trump Under Fire.” The Special Counsel’s office has already made a rare public denial of one of those claims: that Mueller’s office actually drafted indictments against Trump for obstruction of justice. The New York Times reported on the new book as coming out “despite lingering questions about its accuracy.”
While Mueller’s office categorically denied the claim, Wolff insisted ‘My source is impeccable, and I have no doubt about the authenticity and the significance of the documents.”
The notice letter is ironic given Hunter Biden’s scorched Earth strategy of threatening lawsuits, including defamation, against critics. It did not work. Indeed, Biden abandoned lawsuits after his pardon by his father.
Previous media outlets have pulled similar statements against the First Lady.
The Daily Beast pulled the article detailing allegations by Wolff that Melania Trump was introduced to her husband, Donald Trump, via a modeling agent connected to Epstein. It ran the following notice: “Editor’s Note. After this story was published, The Beast received a letter from First Lady Melania Trump’s attorney challenging the headline and framing of the article. After reviewing the matter, the Beast has taken down the article and apologizes for any confusion or misunderstanding.”
Likewise, James Carville apologized to the First Lady after repeating the claim and stated on his podcast:
“In last week’s podcast episode, we spoke with Judd Legum. After the episode, we received a letter from Melania Trump’s lawyer. He took issue with our title of one of those YouTube videos from that episode and a couple of comments I made about the first lady. We took a look at what they complained about, and we took down the video and edited out those comments from the episode. I also take back these statements and apologize.”
Since Biden named the source of his information, that appears to constitute an acknowledgement that Biden does not assert that the claim is valid. But does the claim that BIden somehow suggested that he actually believes the claim constitute defamation? Or does that claim have to be supported by a direct admission of belief by Biden? Or is that up to a jury?
This appears to be potentially a major limit on free speech.
Knowingly repeating a proven false defamation? I don’t think that’s a huge burden on free speech. Probably hard to prove, but Hunter is stupid enough to make it possible. He seems to have trouble keeping his mouth shut.
Problem, there was no knowably-false repetition, merely a suggestion that he may have believed it … or even been agnostic about it. Tort law should not cancel fundamental freedoms quite so glibly.
You would take free speech as far as allowing your personal detractors to malign you, ruining your professional reputation? Very few “free speechers” are willing to entertain lavish rights to defame, injure and humiliate being used AGAINST THEMSELVES. They always take up the side of the strident voice sharing their own viewpoint.
Only a fool cedes to his enemies unlimited rights to infowarfare attack. That extreme of free speech zealotry exceeds common sense. It’s unbalanced and reckless.
Oh, no! Not the Beatles too!
“Well she was just seventeen, uh, you know what I mean.”
Dear Prof Turley,
Reading your ‘blog’ is like a torts class. .. I’m anonymously slandered here all the time.
First of all, Epstein introduced a lot of people. Why would [the mere act of] introducing Melania to Donald, even if such a thing occurred, be particularly slanderous, or more importantly, libelous?
*special note. I’m convinced Epstein was some kind of spook and introduced people for a living. .. successfully too.
Otoh, I can understand how Melania could be confused for a ‘honeypot’. Women pay a lot of money to look like Melania. Melania probably pays a lot money to look like Melania. Breasts like that alone would cost $20-30,000, adjusted for inflation .. . if I had the money, I would buy a pair for myself.
“Reading your ‘blog’ is like a torts class. .. I’m anonymously slandered here all the time.”
Try being less of an putz. Example, your entire post here is slander (or libel, actually).
You sound like a d*ck salesman with a mouthful of samples!
DG
I’m anonymously slandered here all the time.
____________________
Would it be, because you lie or try to spin the story like george does.
The issue is you, not us.
can’t be slandered if you dont know who the slanderer is.
Given the number of people who already have issued retractions and offered apologies, it would seem likely that there is no Epstein linkage between President and Mrs. Trump.
I suspect that the retraction and apology are all she really wants, using the lawsuit as a cudgel.
Hmmm!!!!
No linkage between Trump, Melania and Epstein you say ????
Apparently you are living in a cave somewhere, and have not seen the hundreds of photos of Trump and Melania with Epstein and Maxwell
https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=e77f9c08ad4d25ad&sxsrf=AE3TifNZrLGxOkrlgn-zgrpAxMY5ecKSdQ:1755200338702&udm=2&fbs=AIIjpHxU7SXXniUZfeShr2fp4giZ1Y6MJ25_tmWITc7uy4KIejIPgyyGM1YJJNz-u26A7UQjdzW_3QjQoz5M3kGxMbP-gVAKZ_KVR2vOu6SW9sagS7yBI1jCYKAOJ6VGHgK7MGFSDg-6pEmw2fO6Q9hgCr3A3vOcwExb8ndDJ8SihSe-ZgRTakVDC56m5dwyNH7dHYHERtSbYfQX9DAeb8hQGQ6S5CPoMw&q=pictures+of+trump+with+epstein&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwi5x8rlhouPAxXHJDQIHfx9E5UQtKgLegQIFBAB&biw=1920&bih=929&dpr=1
Hey, it appears that you also didn’t get the memo. Nobody cares about Epstein anymore. Google searches for Epstein are down over 90%. Trump’s poll numbers are stable or rising. All of your screeching failed to move the needle at all. You can move on to the next talking point now.
Wow, you must really love keeping your lips on Trump’s backside…hard.
“ Wow, you must really love keeping your lips on Trump’s backside…hard.”
Not as much as you like to ride the shriveled remains of Bill Clinton.
Since no one cares about Epstein any more, all the more reason why this lawsuit would fall flat on its face. How can Hunter have defamed Mrs Trump, if no one cares whether he introduced the Trumps? Which indeed no one does care. How they met is completely irrelevant to anything.
A much more interesting picture, Fact Check: Epstein Accuser Chauntae Davies Gave Bill Clinton a Shoulder Massage. Pics Emerged Almost 20 Years Later
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-epstein-accuser-chauntae-190000637.html
And dont forget this little FACT, Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender’s jet much more than previously known
“Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” — even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.”
“Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25, 2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed.”
https://www.foxnews.com/us/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known
But wait! There is more!
James Comer has dropped a bombshell, naming Bill Clinton as the prime suspect in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
He says Clinton won’t be able to escape this time, pointing to bipartisan support for the probe.
“He’s a prime suspect to be deposed.” pic.twitter.com/MErzmA17m5
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) August 12, 2025
But that’s not fair! The Democrat talking points will all have to be rewritten now!
*. Who was on the flights with Clinton ? How many days stay?
No one, including Trump, denies that Epstein and Trump knew each other. They both walked in the same social circles in Manhattan. But, did Trump partake of Epstein’s escort business, there is no proof of that. Was Trump a client of Epstein’s legitimate financial business? Perhaps. Nothing wrong with that. But to make allegations without any proof that Trump was part of Epstein’s escort criminal group, that is just wrong.
“But to make allegations without any proof that Trump was part of Epstein’s escort criminal group, that is just wrong.”
They’re desperate.
What’s to worry? The FBI has been collecting the “Epstein files” since at least 2006. Meaning that four administrations at least (five, if you count Trump twice) have had possession of them, or parts of them. Highly unlikely that the DOJ (adversarial & highly inimical to Trump) from 2016 to Jan 2025 wouldn’t have thought to look under that rock. Nope, if I were Trump or a big Trump supporter I wouldn’t be much worried.
Not just multiple administrations – but special counsels, anti-Trump lawyers, much of the democratic party – former freinds attention seekers, nearly every reporter on the planet have sought ‘the holy grail” – something damning about Trump.
After more than a decade – pretty much NOTHING has held up.
In 2015 O did not expect Trump so survive the first few primaries.
I had little doubt there were too many skeletons in his closet, and that he Mouth would force him out. Then he pissed all over John McCain’s military service and I was sure it was over. McCain was NOT a very good republican politician. But he deserves a great deal of credit for his military service and he is a Hero.
But Trump survived – and thrived.
If you think NOW – a decade later there is some new evidence regarding Trump coming out – your nuts. If anything damning existed – Comey and Schiff would have leaked it – and DID – even it it was all lies.
Well, Trump could have covered up a lot. Now that he’s president and has full control of the DOJ, AG, FBI, etc. It would be very easy to hide any damning information.
He’s already been convicted of falsifying business records and is also a sexual abuser.
If Clinton can still be investigated for a connection to Epstein Trump can also be subject to the same level of scutiny. Trump and Epstein often shared rides on each other’s planes. The island was not the only place Epstein had “business”.
“ Trump and Epstein often shared rides on each other’s planes. The island was not the only place Epstein had “business”.”
Your desperation stinks. This is your tar baby. Not Trump’s.
So now, Teterboro, New Jersey, is the site of illegal fleshpots? Because Trump’s name appears on only seven of Epstein’s flight manifests, all between Palm Beach and Teterboro.
Steve,
Well said and thank you for pointing out those facts. Our lower elevator level IQ leftist friends tend to ignore those pictures of Bill Clinton with Epstein, Bill Clinton taking all those trips on Epstein’s Lolita Express or that James Comer announced Bill Clinton is the prime suspect in the Epstein investigation. I mean, WOW! Who would ever blatantly ignore those facts other than lower elevator level IQ leftists.
As I have stated more than a few times here on the good professor’s blog, I think there are more than a few people on both sides of the isle who want to keep the Epstein files from ever seeing the light of day. Some very rich and powerful people from Wall St., Hollywood, Silicon Valley (there are pics of Bill Gates with Epstein too), international diplomats, heads of state, even royalty and not just from the UK.
The sudden obsession from the left over this is nothing but political voyeurism from the same people who can’t control their own compulsions. like pushing for men to undress in women’s locker rooms and compete in women’s sports. They’ve become the embodiment of perverse sexism, lecturing others while drowning in their own hypocrisy.
The anonymous leftist posters on this blog aren’t just watching, they’re undressing themselves in public view. Let’s just look at them and laugh.
There isn’t even any proof that Epstein had an “escort” business. It’s all speculation.
ATS – did you bother to LOOK at the pictures in the google search you linked ?
You can not get passed the first row of 5 before hitting a duplicate.
By the time you are in the 3rd row – the pictures are no longer of Trump AND epstein, but Trump OR Epstein.
I did not bother to scroll through “hundreds” – but it seems pretty clear from the first page – that there are maybe 5-10 UNIQUE pictures of Trump and Epstein – off course if we are going to count duplicates – there must be MILLIONS.
There appears to be ONE picture that MIGHT have Trump Epstein Ghislaine and Melania – but it is hard to tell – the photo is atleast 30 years old and Trump does have a “Type”.
It easily could be Trump with someone who looks similar to Melania.
What I found interesting is that E Jean Carrol claims to have had a closer relationship to Trump than Epstein – and after years of searching there has been ONE photo found with Trump and Carrol in the same picture – Trump misidentified Carrol as Marla Maples – but Carroll looks an incredible amount like Maples 40+ years ago.
The similarity undermines Trump’s claim that Carroll was NOT his type – Melania is, Maples is, Ivana is. And Carroll was once a ringer for Maples.
At the same time a single photo from the nearly 80 years that Trump has been in NYC and it is not even clear in that photo that Carrol did more than appear in a Photo that Trump was in.
But you looney’s on the left beleive that a woman who has accused every single man she has ever spent more than 5 minutes with of Raping her – who wrote numerous books – calling out all the different men who raped her – and NEVER mentioned Trump ?
All you have done is prove the inability of left wing nuts to critically think.
Stormy Daniels atleast ACTUALLY met and talked publicly with Trump.
I honestly do not care if they slept together. But I do not beleive Daniels – she was not credible on the stand and because in 2016 if her story was True – Clinton would have paid a Million dollars for it – she aid 1.6M for the Steele Dossier. Proof that Trump cheated on Melania while she was pregnant would be worth a fortune in 2016.
True stories are worth a fortune to the opposition, and to the media and to wealthy democrats and their interest groups. But false stories are worth NOTHING to anyone except the person you are lying about.
It is defamation to publicly pedal false claims about others – as Hunter will likely discover.
But it is perfectly legal to sell a false story to the target of the story – and celebrities pay to kill false stories all the time. We KNOW Trump paid to kill the FALSE story about a love child with a hispanic maid – though YOU probably beleive it.
So we have a handful of photos of Trump and Epstein – two people we KNOW had some interations. Who went to many of the same events and parties in NYC, who floated in the same circles, Who were both Wealthy New Yorkers. We further KNOW that Epstein went to Maralago – an that Trump threw him out.
It is actually surprising that there are so FEW pictures.
So you have a few pictures – NOT hundreds, that show that Trump and Epstein were both invited to the same events in NY.
And MAYBE you have Melania in one of these photos – or maybe not.
This proves WHAT ?
Again We already KNOW they were both prominent New Yorkers and invited to the same events.
Do you have anything more substantial ?
It proves Trump and Epstein shared similar attitudes towards women. Both have historical records of being perverts and sexual abusers. Trump has more in common with Epstein than Clinton.
“ It proves Trump and Epstein shared similar attitudes towards women”
It’s amazing your powers of mind reading.
“Trump has more in common with Epstein than Clinton.”
Except it’s Clinton that’s been to Pedophile Island, not Trump. And what, 26 times? Good try though, we understand that you’re working as hard as you can to deflect.
BillMonica was only 22,when the 49 yo Clinton began their Oval Office affair. While Melania was all of 28 when she met Trump.
1. Epstein did not intoduce Melania to Trump.
2. Epstein was in no position to introduce Melania to Trump, bc he did not know Melania until Trump introduced Melania to him.
3. Epstein was a sex trafficker. Saying that a sex trafficker introduced Melania to Trump would imply that she was a sex worker.
*. It shouldn’t stop with an apology. Sullivan needs to be changed. Then there’s the Colbert ridicule. What decent person would run for office. What decent person would put a family through any of this until the government falls to nail salon techs and frauds.
Show a picture of Melania and the 🦇 of envy fly from Pandora’s box. Nothing good goes unpunished. The fangs of wolves leave nothing beautiful and innocence is trampled by hooves.
Disappointing a retraction will do after the damage is done. It’s not enough. All this damage and I’ll just apologize isn’t justice.
Is Wolffe’s work categorized under political fiction?
I have no knowledge if the pictures are real or not, Ai after all. But what I will say, she was a model had/has a perfect body that I’m sure she’s proud of, so to those that fain being aghast grow up it’s not your life, she commented no crime. What’s Jesus statement to the Pharisees: “He who is without sin can cast the first stone.”
Prima Facie evidence the Democratic Party and its members are judgmental hypocrites and speak with a vile tongues.
George W
“Prima Facie evidence the Democratic Party and its members are judgmental hypocrites and speak with a vile tongues.”
Perhaps so, but really they’re just desperate to try to drive in some wedge to break up the base. Epstein Epstein Epstein didn’t work, so it’s on to the next fake scandal. Rinse and repeat.
Warning to JT, Darren and commentators
Joe.My.God “Joe Jervis” hard core homosexual and LGBT bloggers are crashing and harassing JT commentators.
Oh noez!!!
George W
The most revealing images of naked Melania were published by GQ in 2000, long before AI.
Clearly, the only rational explanation is that those rascally Democrats have a secret time machine that allowed them to make the AI images now and travel back 25 years to publish them.
And don’t get me started on the Democrat’s Jewish space lasers that Marjorie Taylor Greene discovered as the cause of all the wild fires.
Nobody cares. Get better material.
The dems have been so awful (but I repeat myself) to her. Whatever happens with the lawsuit, I am glad that further light is being shone on the modern left’s irrational hatred. Melania has done nothing whatsoever but exist, and these people are freaking terrible. Will never, ever vote dem again.
Love it….
The man facing a federal assault charge for throwing a Subway sandwich at a federal officer in Washington, D.C., was an employee at the Department of Justice, Attorney General Pam Bondi said.
What a fool, you think he would know working for the DOJ. What a moron.
Maybe he can get a job at Subway Sandwiches in the Delivery Department.
Instant karma.
Lately I’ve been wondering, are there federal misdemeanors? They all seem like felonies.
Yes. Presence in the US by an alien who didn’t present himself to federal agents at the border is a federal misdemeanor, punishable by six months in jail.
Prof. Turley,
You have pointed out that Hunter Biden’s counsel could claim the First Lady is a public figure and subject to a higher standard of proof in her case. But isn’t it true that Hunter is just as much a public figure and should also be subject to that same higher standard before goes flapping his jaws in a defamatory manner against another person? He shouldn’t be permitted to just cite Michael Wolff as his source and leave it at that, even if Wolff’s reputation were as sterling as it could possibly be. Doesn’t he bear a certain responsibility to establish that his statements lacked actual malice?
I kind of suspect that since he is still flapping his jaws in response to Melania’s letter, his attorneys might just withdraw if he doesn’t very quickly apologize and retract. That is, unless he has actual proof in his possession to back up his claims against Melania.
Porr Billary, the funds are drying up.
I wonder why? Like just maybe no more USAID
*. Put high speed rail on the list and housing for homeless and medicaid, and every other program under the sun including Zumba dancing.
@Dustoff
Yup, we were paying for all of it. What a perfect, perfect grift. Even if prosecutions aren’t forthcoming, we can all see, and we do. We will not go back; not a chance, not ever.
*. Yes, it’s about Sullivan and heightened scrutiny. SCOTUS case.
The picture of First Lady (for a second time) Melania Trump the good professor used is indeed a classy one.
Then, we see the dumb comments from the annoy moron and how classless she is.
What a striking contrast!
How marvelous!!!
“Then, we see the dumb comments from the annoy moron and how classless she is.”
Gigi is just jealous because even after all that surgery and the hormone treatments, nobody believes that it’s real.
“The picture of First Lady . . .”
Yes!
She is a real First *Lady*. As opposed to a schoolmarm or an eternally aggrieved Amazon woman.
We would know if the modeling agent had a connection to Epstein if the files were released.
Turley didn’t say if the suit would be successful. Only that the first lady can be considered a public figure and that is more likely than not. I’m surprised Turley missed the statement Hunter made was statement of fact when he mentioned Wolff. He only repeated what Wolff said in his book.
Epstein had a lot of connections. It’s one reason why his notoriety is well established in MAGA-verse. Trump and Epstein were big fans of young models and teenage beauty pageant contestants.
Hey Gigi, I know that you were busy this week working the back room of that orthodontist convention, but we sent you a memo that the Epstein thing is dead. Google searches are down over 90%. Trump’s numbers are even up. You’re supposed to move on to the next phony talking point.
“MAGA”
Uh oh!!! You said the MAGA incantation THREE TIMES!!!! Let’s go live to the Oval Office to see the conjuring of President Harris!!!
Sure you want to keep repeating the Epstein thing?
James Comer has dropped a bombshell, naming Bill Clinton as the prime suspect in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
He says Clinton won’t be able to escape this time, pointing to bipartisan support for the probe.
“He’s a prime suspect to be deposed.” pic.twitter.com/MErzmA17m5
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) August 12, 2025
Yep upstate and a dem judge is (still) holding up the release.
But the fools don’t even say it.
DustOff,
You are correct. We always notice how the annony moron never brings up uncomfortable facts.
Repeating a lie told by another can land you in defamation hot water.
Who had connections with Epstein?
Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender’s jet much more than previously known
“Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” — even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.”
“Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25, 2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed. ”
https://www.foxnews.com/us/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known
Dear Mr. Turley, I am sure this lawsuit stemming from the First Lady will not go anywhere. This type of a lawsuit is very hard to prove and in this day and age, the jury most likely turn it around and blame Mrs. Trump. Because conservative women do not follow the rules laid out for them by liberals, their friends in the media enjoy picking them apart. I would also ask Anonymous who made the disgusting claim regarding Mrs. Trump, please provide your actual name , the name of the publications, and dates of such. My guess is you will not be able to do any of it!!!
I posted a link to a Google search that has hundreds of images of a naked Melania.
The publications include Gentleman’s Quarterly, The Times, Yahoo Lifestyle, Inside Edition.
Rupert Murdoch’s, NY Post has multiple stories with naked images.
Look for yourself
It is all there if you simply care to look at the link I posted.
“Look for yourself
It is all there if you simply care to look at the link I posted.”
Do your own work Gigi. Is your highway overpass job doing that badly now that you’re stuck trolling the blog of a successful law professor again? I told you that you need to use some mouthwash once in a while.
A much more interesting picture, Fact Check: Real photo shows Epstein accuser Chauntae Davies giving Bill Clinton shoulder massage in 2002
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-real-photo-shows-130000750.html
If Hunter has a judgment entered against him, he can always go back to his art work. How about a still-life: “The Spoon, the Straw and the Powder.”
“The Spoon, the Straw and the Powder.”
I couldn’t stop laughing at Hunter justifying crack as somehow being cleaner and safer than even alcohol. Smartest man that Joe Biden knows!!!!
Any Democrats wonder why their approval rating is sub 20% and dropping. Look at their nutcases here. Defending street crime in DC. Libeling the First Lady. Bemoaning cheap food. What a party.
Hmmm????
“Libeling the First Lady”
As Prof. Turley has frequently pointed out, the truth is an absolute defense in libel actions
The TRUTH is there for all to see.
Melania Trump has a long history of posing naked in many disreputable publications.
“Melania Trump has a long history of posing naked in many disreputable publications.”
Gigi is just jealous because she’s been reduced to giving tricks under the highway overpass to bored long-haul truckers. Don’t fret honey, you’ll earn your bus fare any week now!!
Links please. I like to decide for myself what the TRutH is! I also am interested to discern if your idea of ‘long’ and ‘many’ are scientifically supportable. /s . Cuz you may need to be told.
Carole
Don’t pretend you don’t know Melania has a long history of posing naked.
I already posted the link to a Google search with hundreds of images.
You might need to turn off the “Safe Search” function if it is activated.
Here are a couple of individual links:
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections
https://nypost.com/2016/07/30/melania-trump-like-youve-never-seen-her-before/
if this was some fugly land whale leftist you’d be calling it stunning and brave. Why do leftists hate beauty? Is it because you’re so hideous inside?
Here are a couple more:
https://www.thewrap.com/melania-trump-bares-all-on-the-cover-of-ny-post/
https://www.dialoguemagazine.com/index/?p=27118
Good looking woman. I’m jealous.
“Melania Trump has a long history of posing naked in many disreputable publications.”
When will Leftists (and anti-Trumpers) learn that they can lie with impunity in the media, but not here.
That “long history” was once in 1997 and once in 2000. That “many” was twice. Your “disreputable publications” was British GQ, a men’s culture and lifestyle magazine that is decades old and is published by Conde Nast (CN). CN also publishes Vogue, The New Yorker, Architectural Digest. The other “disreputable publication” was Max Magazine (France), which also was a men’s lifestyle and culture publication.
Twice over three years is *not* a “long history.” Two times is *not* “many.” Lifestyle and culture magazines are *not* “disreputable publications.”
Peddle your lies (and your smears) elsewhere.
Sam
Hmmm!!!
So the skank only posed naked two times.
That would be 200% more often than any other First Lady.
Once a skank, always a skank.
I think First Skank would be a more appropriate title.
“ Hmmm!!!
So the skank only posed naked two times.
That would be 200% more often than any other First Lady.
Once a skank, always a skank.
I think First Skank would be a more appropriate title.”
Party of women, everyone. Party of women.
Gigi you’re such a bore.
“. . . 200% more . . .”
So you are honesty, decency, and mathematically challenged.
“So you are honesty, decency, and mathematically challenged.”
A perfect leftist. Dollars to donuts she’s got a face that would peel paint off. That would explain her extreme jealousy of the First Lady.
“. . . a face that would peel paint off.”
Definitely a soul that would.
Sam:
This is the same “anonymous” who yesterday tried to convince others that I am a “racist.”
Some real pent-up lashing-out-type behaviour manifesting there, n’est ce pas?
Yeah, she’s a real pice of work.
“. . . n’est ce pas?”
What that creature did to you was vicious. And of all the commenters here, you deserved it the least.
Fortunately, a number of us came to your defense.
Sidebar: Wheat and Corn futures at multiple year lows this morning. Trump’s going to have secretly bail out the farmers again like he did his first term.
“Wheat and Corn futures at multiple year lows this morning.”
Oh noez, cheap food, whatever will we do. Too bad we don’t have that Biden guy around anymore, now there’s a guy who could pump up some prices.
Wondered how long it would take a magat to expose their stunning idiocy on topic…
Tariffs raise prices on imported goods.
They also discourage foreign markets from buying exported American products. And since you clearly don’t know, foreign markets buy the bulk of American grains.
Honey, nobody cares about your sophomoric analysis of anything. Why don’t you get back to your highway overpass and earn money more legitimately than by trolling the blog of a successful law professor? I’m sure that your regulars there are missing you, and are hoping that that last stubborn tooth finally fell out.
You obviously care, skank. Thanks for reading….
And just think… when my last tooth falls out I can gum your bean all the better. Just like you enjoy it.
I bet that you’ll now be able to double your rate to a full fifty cents, and you’ll earn that elusive bus fare that much sooner!!! We’re all “pulling” for you sweetcheeks!!!!
Why are you worried Gigi? You corn hooch will be cheaper now. What’s the problem?
Its not hard to see why the USA is in disarray – just look at the comments here. Sad, really sad.
Don’t mistake one histrionic personality disorder spaz as being the country as a whole.
Excuse me, but are you referring to yourself anon? Just kidding.
One spaz? Not one but a whole blog full of ranting fools. And I’m being polite.
So if this is public discourse, I can only imagine what the fools here consider hateful comments.
Just imagine being forced to use your legal name.
Only the dems are in disarray.
“It would be interesting if Hunter’s counsel claimed that the First Lady is technically a “public official” to trigger a higher standard of proof.”
*******************
I think she is a public figure given her post and visibility. Here’s one of my favorite scenes from one of my favorite movies (“Absence of Malice”) explaining why it matters. Forgive the blurry:
Love that f#$king clip!!
It’s hilarious to see Gigi here desperately trying to be witty. Truth be told, she’d lose a battle of wits to a pencil eraser, but it’s inspiring to see her pick herself up and try again and again and again.
Hilarious.
Truthfully though Turls, Hunter should be going after you personally for your character assassination campaign you ran on him for multiple years in order to politically damage his father.
“Truthfully though Turls, Hunter should be going after you personally for your character assassination campaign you ran on him for multiple years in order to politically damage his father.”
Oh I don’t know, I think Hunter did a pretty good job assassinating his own character by being a skeevy piece of crap. Hey, did you ever see what was on Hunter’s laptop???
No. Neither have you. So I guess we’re both just going to have get by with trump’s sexual abuse judgement and tapes of him hanging out with Epstein and getting caught talking about grabbing pussy.
“No. Neither have you. So I guess we’re both just going to have get by with trump’s sexual abuse judgement and tapes of him hanging out with Epstein and getting caught talking about grabbing pussy.”
Hey Gigi, you didn’t get the memo, probably because you were too busy “under the bridge” at the time, but the Epstein stuff is over. Google searches are down like 90%. Trump’s numbers are the same or better than before. You can move on now.
I don’t know about you, Gigi, I saw enough pics of Hunter smoking in his skivvies to last me a lifetime.
“No. Neither have you.”
Sweetie, everyone got to experience the Hunter laptop. You do know that it was all real, of course. Hunter has never denied it was real.
Hey Gigi, I see that you’re not responding to my inquiries about your night job. Should I be talking directly to your “associate”? Thanks so much honey.