The Legion of Democratic Doom? Biden Operatives Plan “Swat Force” on Hunter Biden Scandal


YouTube Screengrab

Below is my column in the New York Post on the very public plan to target potential witnesses — and even media — in the Biden influence peddling scandal. It is rare to see such a scorched Earth campaign intentionally made public. When Hillary Clinton’s campaign funded the Steele dossier, it hid its role and even denied the funding when asked by reporters. This was clearly an effort to not only reveal the plan but to specifically declare the potential targets, including key witnesses, against the Bidens.

Here is the column:

Just when you thought our politics could not get more poisonous, a recent meeting in California suggests the past is mere prelude. The Washington Post, which revealed the powwow, described it as Biden family “allies” planning an offensive to blunt any investigation into the Bidens’ alleged multimillion-dollar influence-peddling schemes.

Republicans will see it more like the gathering of the Legion of (Democratic) Doom. Some of the most controversial political operatives are involved in the all-hands-on-deck effort to protect the Bidens.

The California meeting’s host was none other than Hunter Biden’s friend, agent and lawyer Kevin Morris. After Hunter was placed under investigation for, among other possible charges, tax evasion, Morris reportedly paid off as much as $2.8 million in back taxes for Hunter.

Morris, per The Washington Post, called for a “more aggressive” response to those seeking to investigate the alleged influence peddling. That plan includes hitting critics, such as Fox News, with possible defamation lawsuits. (For full disclosure, I appear as a legal analyst on Fox News.)

The paper also reported Morris “outlined extensive research on two potential witnesses against Hunter Biden — a spurned business partner named Tony Bobulinski and a computer repairman named John Paul Mac Isaac.” “Spurned” is hardly the sole or most relevant description of Bobulinski: The businessman was recruited by the Biden family to manage foreign deals and later directly contradicted President Joe Biden’s claims he knew nothing of those dealings. His testimony could present a serious threat in the coming House investigation in establishing not only the president’s knowledge but his possible receipt of proceeds from the deals.

Morris’ plan could easily be taken as a declaration of all-out war on potential witnesses against Hunter Biden.

What’s most interesting about the piece is why The Washington Post was given such access and such a detailed account. Generally, political operatives lay out scorched-earth campaigns in secret. But someone wanted this campaign to be public before the House can call any witnesses.

For key witnesses like Bobulinski, the message is about as subtle as a two-by-four to the head. The Washington Post is viewed as one of the most pro-Biden newspapers in the country and only recently admitted the Hunter Biden laptop was authentic after pushing the false Russian-disinformation claim. Now the paper is detailing a plan that could create an open season on those who might try to substantiate the Biden family’s influence peddling.

Notably, the article stresses this effort is “operating separately from the White House. [David] Brock said his organization also remains independent of Hunter Biden and his team and is following its own strategy.”

The separation is important to deflect any allegations of witness intimidation. Media and political figures leveled such claims against the Trump White House when impeachment witnesses were attacked in the press. Congressional Democrats denounced criticism of the witnesses as an effort to silence or deter witnesses from coming forward. (For the record, I also criticized the targeting of witnesses against Trump even if it did not constitute chargeable witness intimidation).

Those who view this as a not-so-veiled threat will likely cite the inclusion of David Brock, one of the most controversial and reviled Democratic operatives in Washington.

Long a radical figure closely associated with Hillary Clinton’s campaigns, Brock has repeatedly been at the center of controversial attack campaigns and was most recently tied to news sites criticized as fakes or ploys.

Many see him as the lowest common denominator of Democratic operatives, someone willing to take extreme measures to support Democratic figures and causes. Even Biden senior adviser Neera Tanden allegedly once remarked, “I hope Hillary truly understands now how batshit crazy David Brock is.”

Brock, however, has always given figures like Clinton deniability for direct responsibility for his actions. He described his new group, Facts First USA, as a “SWAT team” designed to “ensure that the media and public do not accept the false narrative that flows from congressional investigations.”

The Post described the meeting as a “glimpse into a sprawling infrastructure that is rapidly, almost frantically, assembling to combat Republicans’ plans to turn Hunter Biden into a major news story when the GOP takes over the House next year.” It also discussed an array of well-known lawyers the Biden family has assembled as well as plans by the White House and Democratic National Committee.

Various Democratic groups plan to attack efforts to disclose the Bidens’ multimillion-dollar efforts by attacking Donald Trump’s family. These include the Congressional Integrity Project, which recently hired Jeff Peck, the chief of staff to Biden when he was a senator. These talking points are already appearing in the media, which are heavily invested in denying any scandal connected to the family.

That’s why the Post article looks like a shot across the bow of any potential witnesses. This is not to say these reporters are knowing agents of this campaign, but Democratic operatives clearly wanted people to know about this alliance.

The article touches all the bases to insulate the Bidens and the Democratic National Committee from responsibility for what Brock and Morris may unleash. However, with the inclusion of former Biden staff and allies, it’s a line that can be quickly lost as investigations heat up. Targeting witnesses like Bobulinski could invite congressional investigators to look more closely at these groups and their funding.

Morris could also be taking a real risk. There are already questions about whether he was acting as counsel, agent or friend in reportedly paying off tax debts for Hunter Biden. Rules of professional ethics demand clarity in legal representation.

Moreover, Morris himself could be called as a witness and face questions over his own role in the scandal and its suppression in the media. That makes orchestrating an aggressive public campaign more problematic if it targets or intimidates other witnesses.

This is, of course, well known to these sophisticated political operatives, which makes the effort to publicize this campaign all the more concerning. House Democrats have blocked efforts to investigate any Biden influence peddling. They will have to take ownership of that refusal if the investigation now establishes a massive and corrupt operation.

But the new campaign is designed to give plausible deniability and comfortable distance from planned attacks on witnesses and commentators. Hunter Biden may have collected millions in selling access and influence, but anyone investigating or accusing the Bidens is now fully warned: Proceed at your own peril.

Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.

196 thoughts on “The Legion of Democratic Doom? Biden Operatives Plan “Swat Force” on Hunter Biden Scandal”

  1. David “THIS time I’m not lying” Brock tried to repudiate his own book (“The Real Anita Hill”), you can read that somewhere in the reviews section on Amazon. But as the heart of the book is a chapter called “In Her Own Words” that was an exercise in futility.

    95% of the “media” already decided it was OK for the FBI to order the blocking of the Hunter laptop story before the election in 2020. They are “all in” on shutting off discussion of any of the evidence from the laptop or associated materials. Am I the only one who noticed Brian Stelter was fired a week after the admitted on-air that there was something to the laptop evidence?

    Come on. If they had jpegs and videos of a Trump son yanking a woman like a dog on a leash they would have it running in an inset on the corner of the screen on MSNBC and CNN. It is explicitly illegal for a US official to visit a foreign country and designate who the “go to” people are to do business with, yet that is exaclty what the Bidens did in China and Ukraine. Media treated this as SOP. Similarly, no one asked WHO it was at DC DOJ that told then-US attorney Acosta to sign off on the sweetheart deal for Epstein because “he belongs to Intel”. Acosta stated this at his press conference as he left his job as Trump’s Labor Secretary after the corporate editors decided to make something of a story they had previously ignored. I think they call this “Full Spectrum Dominance”.

    But then if you know about “Operation Mockingbird” this is nothing new. See Carl Bernstein’s 1977 Rolling Stone piece “The CIA and the Media”, still on his web page. (More succinct and pointed renditions of Mockingbird can be found through web-searching but it might be better to use something other than Google).

    1. Here’s what will happen. Biden won’t run in ’24. That’s it. Elections are rigged. Biden probably got 8.1 million votes, not 81 million but that’s how these liars work. Humiliation rituals on steroids these past few years with these “individuals” who control everything. Nightmare. These “operatives” are a joke. To paraphrase Iron Mike, Everyone has a plan until nuked start dropping on their doorstep.

  2. Isn’t the 2.8 million pay off on back taxes considered income or gift got Hunter. He then has to pay taxes on that?

    Does that money come from another ‘friend’?

  3. “ROFL. Trump hit the sweet spot of his career being ex president and fundraising off the gullible and information limited. You know, a lot of the people on this blog.”

    Only in your mind.

    I would suggest that the PROVEN information limited are those on the left.

    There is as example, nothing in the “twitter files” that most everyone not on the left did not know more than two years ago.

    Who is it that has been making decisions gullibly and information limited ?

    We are way past “right wing conspiracy theories” – we have as fact a left wing conspiracy.

    Further, the real harm is not to those who were censored. It was to those who were actually deprived the truth – by that “vast left wing conspiracy”

    It is not fox viewers – or briebart, or libertarians that were harmed by the supression of their voices and the truth – it was YOU and all those you deprived of voices you did not like.

  4. “As usual, when Johnny Say proves himself wrong yet again, it won’t affect his rhetoric. He’ll just pick the next Fox talking point to become an key jockey internet expert in his mind warrior. It’ll be fun to see him peddle hard when trump is indicted in January.”

    You have claimed that I am wrong, but you have not even said what I am wrong about much less made an actual argument to support that,
    Provided evidence, backed up a claim made by you – an anonymous poster who by definition has no credibility – that is the price any of us pays for posting anonymously.

    I do not care that you do so. I do care that you are so stupid you do not understand that anonymous inherently means you must prove everything that is not universally excepted within the body of each post.

    You have no identity, no credibility.

    But as is typical – you constantly assume things that are not only not proven, but just not true.

      1. What would the charge be?

        He didn’t vote in all those places, did he?
        Has anyone investigated how his name is registered in more than one place? My son was registered in three places even though he didn’t vote in two of them.

        Let us hear your rationals if you have any.

        1. The charge would be voter fraud. He listed his home in North Carolina at a mobile home he’s never lived in. NC law requires he reside in the address listed on his voter registration.

          Meadows voted using a fraudulent registration. That’s a minimum 18 month prison sentence.

          1. “The charge would be voter fraud.”

            You are stupid. Did he vote more than once? He was a Congressman from N.Carolina. He started a business there, was the head of a county Republican Party in NC, moved several times in NC, and now is said to use a mobile home as his permanent address. As a NC Congressman, where is his home?

            Only idiots make statements like you have indicate a minimum 18 month prison sentence.

            Every blog needs one idiot for entertainment and from what I read you are the idiot entertaining a lot of people.

  5. Leftists try to deflect from, and apologize for, the kleptocratic Biden family by demanding to know: What is the crime?

    Bribery, for starters.

    China, et al., wants access to domestic and international markets (e.g., for its energy companies). To secure that access, China needs special permissions from U.S. politicians (e.g., Biden). So they bought their boy — Biden. (The details of those communist Chinese projects have been noted here, and elsewhere, numerous times. And I am not going to repeat them.)

    It does no good to claim: Well, Biden was not VP at the time. Yes he was. The China, et al., deals started when he was VP.

    And it does no good to claim: Well, Biden wasn’t VP after 2016. China’s not stupid. Neither are the Biden grifters. Both know that JB has political “friends in high places.” For China, et al,, that Biden became “president” in 2020 is merely the poisonous cherry on the cake.

    As a side note: You have to be the world’s biggest dupe to believe that China, et al,, gave millions to the Biden grifters merely out of the generosity of their own hearts. They wanted something. And that something is polticial favors for their companies (including access to American technology). In non-Leftist language that’s called: Bribery.

    1. Bribery? Yeah, sure. One problem what you think it’s bribery is actually quite legal. Even republicans do it. Republicans donors have been doing exactly what Hunter Biden has been accused of.

      “ Soon after Donald Trump took office, people with ties to the Chinese state poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into his re-election bid to get close to and potentially influence the new president.”

      That includes foreign companies and governments getting rooms at his D.C. hotel for hundreds of thousands of dollars. An hotel run by his kids. What a shocker. This is why the Hunter Biden “scandal” will not amount to anything more than what every politician in D.C. both Republican and democrat does. That is why they didn’t bat an eye when Trump’s kids were peddling influence while he was president.

      1. Let’s not lose focus.

        The accusation against Trump is that money from Chinese was wrongfully placed into campaign funds. These things happen continuously because the checks on such donations are not good enough. Trump had no knowledge, did not solicit funds, has been extensively investigated and found innocent, and no money went into his pocket.

        Biden took Chinese money directly into his pocket after he or his sone solicited it, knew it and was never investigated.

        1. “ The accusation against Trump is that money from Chinese was wrongfully placed into campaign funds. These things happen continuously because the checks on such donations are not good enough. Trump had no knowledge, did not solicit funds, has been extensively investigated and found innocent, and no money went into his pocket.”

          LOL!! Riiiiight. Was that before or after Trump’s tax returns were finally handed over to investigators? Trump wasn’t found “innocent” of or had “no knowledge”. He’s still under investigation because he spent a few years hiding his tax returns from investigators. Why would he need to hide his tax returns if he didn’t do anything illegal or corrupt?

          We don’t know if any money “went into his pocket” because he kept hiding his tax returns from investigators.

          Biden on the other hand has had his tax returns avaible for anyone to inspect and if he did indeed “pocket” Chinese money it would show up on his tax returns.

          “ Biden took Chinese money directly into his pocket after he or his sone solicited it, knew it and was never investigated.”

          Nobody has any evidence of what you claim, including you. He has never been investigated because he has not done anything as gratuitously corrupt as Trump. Republicans are focusing on his son which is a private individual and making deals with the Chinese is not illegal or a crime.

          What you are not realizing is that what the Chinese have been doing with Hunter is no different than what they have been doing with Trump. Republican donors, private individuals like Hunter Biden have been peddling influence and access to Trump. None is illegal. But Turley and republicans seem to think it is. So why haven’t they been criticizing Trump for it as they have for Biden? Because they know it’s what happens in politics.

          1. “LOL!! Riiiiight. Was that before or after Trump’s tax returns”

            Pure stupidity. The question has nothing to do with Trump’s tax returns.

            Unrelated Trump is being investigated for political reasons. Back to the Chinese, Biden sold America down the drain and pocketed money while in government. Trump did no such thing.

            “Nobody has any evidence of what you claim, including you. He has never been investigated because he has not done anything as gratuitously corrupt as Trump.”

            How can anyone respond to such a stupid answer. There is plenty of reason to investigate Biden. Intelligence is something you completely lack and prove it many times a day.

            1. This has been going on all along and the only consistency is the selective outrage by the corporate media and the selective enforcement by the DOJ. Johnny Chung and Charlie Trie funneled Chinese state money into the Bill Clinton campaign but were allowed to plead to fines and no jail. Janet Reno refused to consider a special prosecutor because an honest look would have dismantled the entire Clinton political operation. What did Manfort get jail for? Acquiring foreign money (Ukraine) to pay for “lobbying” from the Podesta brothers. The Podestas walked away free without even an investigation, though they did hurriedly disband their “consulting” firm. (If you have never read the Podesta emails from Wikileaks you should, that helps explain a lot of things scrupulously scrubbed from all corporate media–including the supposed conservative Fox.)

              Peter Schweizer has been writing books about this for years. “Secret Empires” exposed (primarily Chinese) influence-buying going back to the deal in the 90s that made Mitch McConnell rich. “Throw Them All Out exposed the pervasive abuse of insider trading by Senate and House members, doing the media’s job and actually shaming “60 Minutes” into doing one (rather shallow) story on the issue. More recently “Red Handed” exposes the most recent influence-buying-on-steroids spread out on everybody from Lebron James to Bill Gates to John Boehner. You can read Chapter 1 on Amazon for free (“The Rope”, like Lenin predicted) but Bill Gertz’s books from the 90s already showed how China went from blowing up launch vehicles on the pad to having killer satellites in the span of BJ Clinton’s terms in office.

              The FBI/DOJ? The FBI said it could not find the bulllet in the Vince Foster case and that McVeigh’s accomplice never existed!

      2. @Svelaz,

        Clearly you’ve never worked in a financial institution or held a state regulated license in either insurance or financial products.
        If you did, you’d have been exposed to the laws and international laws on AML and Bribery/Corruption Acts.


  6. Michelle Obama: Censor-in-Chief
    Twitter obeyed her demand to blacklist Trump.
    by Jeffrey Lord | The American Spectator Published – December 12, 2022
    According to: The American Spectator

    Twitter Files reveal Trump ban came after Michelle Obama, others pressured the company
    Journalist Michael Shellenberger reported Twitter faced ‘internal and external pressure,’ before banning Trump on Jan. 8
    By Lawrence Richard | Fox News Published – December 11, 2022

  7. This is interesting.
    Usually its the coverup that gets you nailed. Just ask Nixon.

    Now here’s a legal question.

    If there is only a report that they are planning a SWAT team and go after named individuals…. but don’t actually take any steps to implement it…
    Is that illegal?

    It will have the same chilling effect… especially after the Jan 6th treatment of those who entered the capitol.


  8. Remember when Hilary was defending Bill against the women making accusations of Bills improprieties? They were either nuts or sluts. I also seem to remember the term “trailer trash”. Get ready for the Biden swat team.

  9. The corruption of the Biden crime family is breathtakingly obvious — to the entire world. After going scorched earth with relentless smear campaigns to protect their crime boss, the Dems will simply urge their demented party leader to step down in order to give Kamala some time behind the wheel so she can get some traction to make a run in ’24. Lord knows Kammy needs a lot of runway to get off the ground.

    Here’s a prediction:

    Hunter skates away practically scott-free. Of course this is why Joe Biden is flaunting it in our faces with Hunter showing up EVERYWHERE these days. It’s in-your-face f*ckery coming from disgusting Joe Biden and his filthy corrupt family. Kammy’s turn at the helm will come before the Big Guy’s term is over.

    Meanwhile Trump, and all in his orbit, will get destroyed while the brazen, criminal sellout Joe Biden walk away practically unscathed. The useless Republican establishment Uniparty traitors and RINOs will be gleefully watching as Trump gets destroyed, doing all they can to help it along. Then they will applaud as their disgusting ‘colleague-in-corruption’ steps down while being praised for his noble lifetime of ‘service to the country.’ Where are the barf bags?

    If the cesspool of lawlessness and corruption that is Washington DC, especially lying Democrats and their propaganda media, don’t make you utterly sick, then you are not paying attention.

    1. What Musk is exposing on twitter – and I doubt we are very far in yet.

      A recent revalation is that the GOVERNMENT pushed for the deletion of 22M tweets providing TRUTHFUL information on problems with mailin balloting in order to choke citizens efforts to reign in the changes state governments were making.

      Also Twitter was actively interfering with the efforts of disfavored political groups to organize peaceful protests.

      The big deal of the twitter files is not that we did not know much of this, it is that it proves it.

      Further it proves that there is a real large “conspiracy” on the left, to silence and avoid any debate with disfavored ideas.

      The left beleives it is morally superior to all, and that justifies immoral actions to preserve and grow power.

      1. Conspiracy is an insufficent definition. Look north…Communist Canada and then south, left wing Mexico doing little to help solve immigration and drugs which Biden and minons (actually the minions – his mind is so far gone he would say yes to anything) apparently, by his(?) actions, supports. Look at Covid, the plandemic (and no one being held accountable and worse still who should be held accountable?).Look at poltiticans, at all levels, and ask a simple question. When (a long time ago) the studies were published in one Indian state of 200 million people and half of Africa, who took ivermectin, which had NO COVID did anyone notice. What about the death rate by country, for any country in the world, Did you know it has not gone up…(and a FYI….the cause of death was listed as covid while cancer, diabetes etc. all declined..along with deaths from FLU.) So who is responsible for the chaos in the world today……YOU because you did no homework (lazy lazy), elected the same corrupt politicians (and school boards),,,,,,endless to be honest. And as a footnote if you think the Republican majority will be able to accomplish much in the morass that now exists…it won’t. And there are three reasons…..!) Media, 2) Personal corruption..yeah yeah most sell out, 3) the DOJ has dossiers on all…..leaks happen (as does shit) and careers end. PS……I did my homework, put in thousands of comments everywhere I could, emailed congress……(with no responses) …and I am pissed…..AT YOU.

        1. Stephen Camm wrote: “What about the death rate by country, for any country in the world, Did you know it has not gone up”

          No that’s wrong.
          Not only have deaths gone up in many countries, they have gone up a lot more than just the reported covid deaths.

          Life insurance companies keep pretty accurate statistics on mortality.
          “One insurance company executive estimated that death rates are currently up 40 percent over what they were pre-pandemic.”

      2. “ The left beleives it is morally superior to all, and that justifies immoral actions to preserve and grow power.”

        You can mind read? Didn’t you once say that’s ridiculous for anyone to claim? Hypocrite much, perhaps?

        1. My remark is not mind reading. It is based on YOUR words and actions.

          You constantly tell everyone that you are better than they are.

          You constantly act immorally defending immoral acts as efforts to protect against some fictitious worse harm from the evil right.

          No one needs to read your mind. You Broadcast your claims to moral superiority and your manufactured justifications for immoral acts.

          1. You may well believe that you can back up all of your claims, but the fact is despite stating “We establish the truth of claims by evidence. The party making the claim bears the obligation to prove their claim” (, you often refuse to meet that obligation — when asked to back up your claims, you often refuse.

            I dare you to meet your obligation and prove that “The left beleives it is morally superior to all, and that justifies immoral actions to preserve and grow power.” Notice that that’s not a claim about a few individuals; it’s a claim about millions of people. How would you even prove that claim?

            1. Please read the comment you cited – it is about lawsuits.

              Absolutely no one here is every going to back up every single claim they make.
              Posts would be 1000 page legal briefs.

              MY wife went to buy a car several years ago.
              The dealer dumped 3/4″ of paperwork on here – to “backup the claim” that she could afford the car.

              Then he went and requested her credit score. He walked back took the pile of papers he gave her, threw them away and said – on your signature alone, you can leave with any car you want on the lot.

              Outside of courts (and even to an extent inside of them – such as with juries).

              Credibility is established by a past record for accuracy.

              Those of you posting on the internet that constantly make things up, that make stupid arguments, that make claims that can not be supported by facts, or that chose to post as anonymous, are obligated to back up non-obvious claims – and anything that does not have near universal consensus is non-obvious.

              Conversely those that establish a track record for accuracy, need not.

              I would note that is how MOST of the real world works.

            2. “I dare you to meet your obligation and prove that “The left beleives it is morally superior to all, and that justifies immoral actions to preserve and grow power.””

              Read your own post. Q.E.D.

              “Notice that that’s not a claim about a few individuals; it’s a claim about millions of people.”
              If I claim the sun will rise tomorrow – and for the next million days – need I prove that ?

              My claim is inherent in your conduct, and your words.

              Regardless, you are attacking a broad generalization. Does it matter if it is only 99.99% ?
              Or 90% ? Does it matter if it is only true of the lefts leaders – the ones in control or the left and some “silent majority” of the left aren’t that way but have no problem following those who are ?

              Your trying to dismiss on technical grounds a claim that need not be 100% true to be thoroughly damning.

              I will cede that there must exist someone on the left somewhere for whom my claim is not true.

              Do you think that destroy’s the claim ?

              Regardless, as you seem to be incredibly pedantic, I did not say “absolutely every single person on the left with no exceptions beleives …”

              1. “My claim is inherent in your conduct, and your words.”

                In other words, it’s your opinion, not a fact (unlike the behavior of the sun, which can be scientifically determined).

                1. Typical left wing nut – “everything is an opinion, and all opinions are equal – except yours which are wrong, and mine which are right”

                  Science BTW is just one process by which we discover truth. It is not truth itself, and like all processes it can be corrupted.
                  Nor is it a universally applicable or useful process.

                  One of the problems the left has is that it does not grasp that science is completely free of moral values.
                  At best it can tell you what will happen if you pull the trigger on a gun. It can not tell you whether that is good or bad.

                  Whenever you have people discussing right or wrong – they are in the domain of morality – not science.
                  Quite often those doing so are ignorant of both morality and science.

  10. Sue them first – $1 billion for conspiracy to violate your rights, and lock up their money so they have nothing to hit you with.

  11. “Martin Luther King in ‘Strength to Love’ said ‘Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.’”

    – George W

    Are you suggesting that readers assimilate the words of and take advice from a grossly dissembling fraud, plagiarist and philanderer who unabashedly lied to his family, his congregation and his God, not to mention America and every nation on earth?

    1. The purveyor of the words does not discount the meaning, though Mr. King had many faults as we all do.

  12. The florid adjurations of milquetoast advocates, solicitors, diplomats and politicos have failed.

    It is long past time for the Rank and File and Generals!

    Article 1, Section 9

    The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

    Among the many, cataclysmic, national aberrations, Mexico is conducting an invasion of the U.S. at a rate of 3 million illegal alien marauders per year.

    Congress has the power to suspend habeas corpus in the case of invasion.

    That is the only constitutional crisis or otherwise “emergency” act it can take; Congress should suspend habeas corpus and make of it whatever it can.

    Congress must do something against those who are destroying America.

  13. The Gestapo Department


    “It’s time to stop talkin’ and start chalkin’!”

    – Chick Hearn, L.A. Lakers Sportscaster

    “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

    – Declaration of Independence, 1776

  14. Martin Luther King in ‘Strength to Love’ said “Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”

    Or maybe something more pointed by Sir William Osler a Canadian physician “The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism.”

    In years past the perfect spouse was “Blind, dumb and owned a liquor store”. Today the perfect Democrat is “Blind and dumb”, no need for liquor as their brains are already addled.

    1. “Martin Luther King in ‘Strength to Love’ said ‘Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.’”

      – George W

      Are you suggesting that readers assimilate the words of and take advice from a grossly dissembling fraud, plagiarist and philanderer who unabashedly lied to his family, his congregation and his God, not to mention America and every nation on earth?

Leave a Reply