Award-Winning Vocalist and Song Writer Reportedly Killed By Her Brothers in Pakistan for Appearing on Television

defaultAyman Udas was an award-winning signer and song writer in Pakistan, who was looking forward to a soaring career. Those hopes ended when she was allegedly shot to death by her brothers, who were outraged by her appearance on television a week earlier in the religiously conservative city of Peshawar.

Both brothers reportedly remain at large. Her last song was entitled “I died but still live among the living, because I live on in the dreams of my lover.”

Her husband is quoted as blaming her conservative family which viewed her as violating their religious and cultural values by being seen on television.

This video shows one of her performances and her incredibly beautiful voice.

For the full story, click here.

21 thoughts on “Award-Winning Vocalist and Song Writer Reportedly Killed By Her Brothers in Pakistan for Appearing on Television”

  1. Galt,

    It’s called “False Plea for Sympathy”.

    If you don’t want the stink of criminals and the ridicule they face upon your precious person, learn to distinguish between “conservative” and “criminal”. Then, pick better people to support. If you actually read the posts here you’d realize most people here do not care about partisanship hackery like yourself. Some are in fact self-identified conservatives (in the classical sense, not the Neocon sense of your lot) and current/former Republicans. We as a group are committed to the Rule of Law and the Constitution. No where in the Constitution does it mention a political party nor are EITHER parties guaranteed continued existence by any document anywhere. If We the People decide we’ve had enough of BOTH parties, you’re gone. Period. End of story. And if Bush/Cheney had been a Democratic administration, we’d still want their heads on a stick. Got that? NOT ABOUT PARTY. ABOUT CRIME. I hate to shout, but the thickness of your skull keeps blocking the message. And guess what? Capitalism isn’t enshrined in the Constitution either. That “socialism” RNC/Fox talking point is 1) crap and 2) getting old. Most of our European allies are parliamentary socialist democracies. So why don’t you go tell England and Sweden how bad they suck and that we’ll be invading there next to “spread democracy”. Or you could learn the distinction between political and economic systems. But that’d require actual thinking on your part.

    YOU ARE BACKING AND MAKING EXCUSES FOR CRIMINALS BY BACKHANDED AND WEAK ATTACKS AGAINST THE SPEAKERS. Ad hominem spiced with self-pity. We’ve gone over the topic many times on many threads as to why these men are criminals and their prosecution is required both by law and as a practical foreign relations matter. But you’ve never read those threads . . . or like to ignore any truths that put your boys behind bars. And just like your play shows, when you can’t beat them, you call them names and run away. Running away is the last component of the “False Plea for Sympathy” strategy. Let’s see if your ego let’s you follow though on the tactic.

    Easily duped? No, you’ve wandered into the wrong cave here, sport. Come on back and drop the fake civility and “whoa is me” hurt feelings and try to protect your treasonous traitors and torturers in a logical and legal framework. See how well you fare, apologist. You will fail like all the others. But you are welcome to try!

    And if you think Former Dem is liberal? That may be misdirection at it’s semi-finest, but if you think that’s a true statement, then you’re just simply not smart enough to play the professional game if you can’t tell he/she/it is a PAID cut and paster troll. Stick to the home version and reading Rand like it is intellectual self-stroking ego porn. Just be sure to keep lots of lotion and tissues on hand. Keep enforcing the idea that you’re an Atlas and so superior to the rest of the riffraff on the planet that are getting in the way of your dystopian ideal where you’re “one of the special ones”. You know, “special” as in “the law doesn’t apply to me or mine” when the reality is that it’s more like “special” as in “needs remedial education about law and civics”. But I really do hope you keep it to yourself (you’re a whiner and nobody like a whiner). It’ll be more satisfying than the drubbing you’ll get trying to defend Bush Co. More satisfying to you anyway. We like destroying the illogical, illegal and specious around these parts.

    Since you are disingenuous, deliberately misleading in your characterizations of postings on this site as only an apologist would be and you’ve stated that was your last post (per tactic), I have this response:

    Your absence will be greatly appreciated.

    So play true to your nature – that bottomless pit of ego. Come on back and act all offended that you’ve once again been “attacked by those nasty lib-ur-alls”. I’ll laugh my ass off. Right before we further expose you for the propagandist you are and take turns dismembering your legal defense of the war criminals.

    You do have a defense for them, right? A legal and ethical one that is? You’re not just blowing smoke?


    Then it is indeed time for Little Johnny Galt to run along.

Comments are closed.