False Flag: Leading Analyst At Pro-Israeli Think Tank Publicly Discusses How U.S. Can Be Forced Into War With Iran

Many critics have argued that there is a concerted effort to push the United States into a war with Iran by supporters of Israel. Patrick Clawson, director of research for the highly influential pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank, seemed intent to prove those rumors true this week in comments as a luncheon on “How to Build US-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout.” Clawson casually discusses how to create a false flag operation to push the U.S. into war to overcome any reluctance by the public. We have been discussing how many leaders like Senator Joe Lieberman had begun to use the same rhetoric that led to the last two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how the suggest timing of an attack has been tied to the presidential election.

In his remarks, Clawson helpfully lists a series of historical events used to push the country into war like the Gulf of Tonkin incident that gave us the Vietnam War. Clawson expressed his frustration in acknowledging that it is “[v]ery hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran.” However, there is hope. Clawson explains that the “traditional way” to get the country into a war is through false flags or manufactured incidents where Americans are killed. Thus, he observes, “we are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians, we could get nastier about it. So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war.”

The fact that one of the leading analysis for the WINEP would feel comfortable in making such comments is itself quite chilling. It indicates that such discussions have become sufficiently regular that it has creeped into public discussion. It is a measure of the secret pressure building to push this country into a third major war despite our crippling economic conditions and losses in military personnel. The assumption in Washington is that neither Romney nor Obama could oppose such a war. Even if Obama does not publicly support Israel, the assumption is that political allies of Israel in Washington can guarantee that we would offer extensive military loans and intelligence. Even if there is a delay in such military loans and support, the assumption is that Israel can go to war with the understanding that the United States will cover a significant portion of the costs. Moreover, in his remarkably candid remarks, Clawson shows how the U.S. can easily be forced into direct combat by pushing Iran to simply kill some Americans or sink a few of our ships. Then members would be clamoring for revenge. Notably, the Israelis have been ratcheting up the war rhetoric in pushing Iran, which predictably has now reserved the right to engage in a preemptive strike not just against Israeli but U.S. interests. We would then, again, find ourselves in a war without any public debate or collective decision.

While Clawson adds a passing caveat that he is not advocating such an approach, his remarks are clearly designed to show how the group can get the United States into a war for Israel if only we can get Iran to kill some of our citizens or soldiers. Those people are of course expendable props in Clawson’s realpolitik.

By the way, Clawson has been enlisted to give his insightful analysis at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. He is also a member of the National Defense University’s Institute for National Strategic Studies. The World Bank connection is particularly interesting given the history with Paul Wolfowitz who pushed the U.S. into two disastrous wars in the Bush Administration and was rewarded with being made the head of the World Bank.

It is the callous disconnect that is most chilling in these remarks. Thousands of U.S. soldiers have died or have been crippled for life in these wars that have left the country near bankruptcy (and increasingly hostile “allies” in Afghanistan and Iraq). Those casualties and costs, however, appear immaterial in the discussion of supporting Israel in a war against Iran.

125 thoughts on “False Flag: Leading Analyst At Pro-Israeli Think Tank Publicly Discusses How U.S. Can Be Forced Into War With Iran”

  1. Ahaa, its good dialogue on the topic of this article here at this website, I have read all that, so at this
    time me also commenting at this place.

  2. Mitt Romney was out and gone but then they — the war mongers — injected money and resurrected his dead horse, now he is almost even with Obama and set to replace him in the Election. If he is elected the end time will be near paving the way for the (second) return of Iesa bin Meryam (Jesus son of Mary).

  3. It is time that we keep an eye on evil/Satanic forces so that they will not hijack the peace of the world. Those who talk war, those who encourage others to go to war, those who indulge in war, will lose their economy and those who lose their economy will lose their treasury and those who lose their treasury will lose their military and those who lose their military will lose everything. Let’s wage peace in the world! The days of the blame game should be over.

  4. Mahboob Khan 1, October 10, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    Well, it’s so simple. Israel will blow something such as sink a U.S. ship and blame it on Iran and then provoke the U.S. to attack Iran. I suggest that the Americans should keep a close watch on the activities of the Zionist lobbies and also a close eye on Israel. It’s in Israel DNA to do something crazy and blame it on others. It is also time for Iran to act responsibly and not get provoked by Israeli tactics. Dangerous times indeed.
    If Israel does something stupid against the United States, it will be their worst day. It will be their end.

  5. Mike S, at the risk of repeating the obvious (although repetition is the foundation of humor, and humor is founded upon repetition), where there’s DNA, there’s crazy DNA, and if that weren’t enough, there’s crazy-making DNA making other DNA crazed, so we better keep an eye on everything.

    Which reminds me of the immigrant who, while learning English, wrote the sentence: “I told mine Uncle Harvey, keep your eye out for a bargain; if your eye falls on a bargain, pick it up.” All the other ESL students mocked him but he had the last word: “Mine Uncle got a glass eye!”

    So anyway, we better keep our eyes on them all… 😉

Comments are closed.